After hours of reading summaries of what Deconstruction means I still had no clue of the concept... but you explained it very well! Thanks!!!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Glad to help!
@PatriciaJKamel8 жыл бұрын
same here ! thank you it was fun .
@kritika88918 жыл бұрын
and i thought i was the only one jostling....i wish they taught like this in the school/ college....thankyou so much...
@john-lenin7 жыл бұрын
Well he gets half of the procedure right but misses the point entirely. Deconstruction is a mode of critical reading where you identify a (common sense) 'binary opposition' in which one term is 'privileged' (for example in Of Grammatology the binary opposition is Speech/Writing; for something more relevant here perhaps Hero/Villain), then invert it to show that the privileged term can only exist because of its opposite. By itself that doesn't accomplish anything particularly productive. The next step is to 'displace' the opposition and create a new perspective with new possibilities. The other point to remember is that Deconstruction is a recursive process: once you have inverted an opposition and displaced it, you create a new perspective - but one that is unavoidable and necessarily another binary opposition with a privileged term. (Derrida's argument is that this way of thinking is built in to the very framework of western language.) But that's ok, as long as we gain a productive new perspective. We just have to remember that each perspective is also contingent and not an ultimate truth.
@ryangarritty97617 жыл бұрын
But that's simply repeating Hegel's dialectic - nothing new here, it seems.
@Baileejordanross7 жыл бұрын
I don't what I expected, but for a late night crash course this had me in tears when he came out with the hammer. Thank you.
@Nancenotes7 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@mzm9521 күн бұрын
😊
@mzm9521 күн бұрын
😊
@charlykyoryu45668 жыл бұрын
Deconstruction really needs to be deconstructed !
@mohamedaminebenlehmar97246 жыл бұрын
charly kyoryu agreed
@jkws05 жыл бұрын
There is no deconstruction without meta-deconstruction, considering it knows its application can't work appropriately unless it is then again applied.
@Cssaarr4 жыл бұрын
@@jkws0 please, elaborate for a newbie
@Jamyn19963 жыл бұрын
Cssaarr deconstruction attempts to dismantle a text, because it assumes that language doesn’t work. But, by using the very tool that it is aiming to criticize, deconstruction invalidates it’s own assumptions that language does not work. Essentially, it deconstructs itself.
@notproductiveproductions35043 жыл бұрын
Are you trying to divide by zero or something
@chijiokeazuawusiefe92908 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Tim. You're such an enthusiastic teacher.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Chijioke Azuawusiefe Thank you! I do enjoy my job!
@theprofmusic8 жыл бұрын
Interesting video and great attempt at explaining deconstruction. With that said (and I'm assuming you may get a lot of these types of responses, so I apologize ahead of time), but I have to say, as a reader of Derrida's works, I have issues with a lot of what you're saying about deconstruction in this video. Deconstruction is not about pointing out the failure of trying to communicate using language, as if Derrida or other deconstructionists are lurking in the background, waiting to say, "Gotcha! You screwed up!" Rather, deconstruction is about moving us away from the thinking that the purpose of language is to communicate meaning. For Derrida, language in itself cannot communicate meaning; rather, interpretation is dependent upon context, and context depends upon a variety of factors, including culture, history, the people participating in the communication, etc. - all things, to a large extent, outside of a communicator's control. But this doesn't mean that using language is useless for Derrida. On the contrary, what's important about language is that due to its structure and quality - i.e. its fluid, evolving rules - we can produce different and newer contexts for interpretation. In other words, language is what allows us to interpret a sentence one way or another. If we use your touchy friend example, what allows a "normal" person to interpret a statement one way and what allows the "touchy" friend to interpret it differently is precisely the same thing - the language involved. Thus, for Derrida, the point of language is not to control meaning (as you said, modify one's language so that we get closer to communicating meaning), but to allow for the possibility of different ways of being interpreted. To reiterate, Derrida and other deconstructionists are NOT saying there is no such thing as meaning. Nowhere in Derrida's work have I ever read this statement or something like it. Rather, what he is saying is that the point of language is not to communicate meaning (since meaning is dependent upon context), but to open itself up to different (possible) interpretations.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Mark Blasini You are very right, and I've oversimplified here--perhaps to the point to misrepresenting the approach. My goal was to give high school students a chance to dabble in theory, and I hope that it at least gives them a taste. The theory is more playful than fatalistic, and I may come across as vilifying the concept without really meaning to. At least that's what I've gleaned from some comments. Thanks for your astute clarification of the ideas! I appreciate the correction and especially your good-natured and polite presentation of it!
@jasonito237 жыл бұрын
Very similar to New Historicism.
@BimaMusisi6 жыл бұрын
To that, I really do agree. One cannot clearly understand deconstruction without studying Frankfurt School's Critical Theory first.
@nellyliyanagamage43056 жыл бұрын
I just came across Derrida's deconstruction theory and what you explained seems to make more sense. Do you have any books or articles I can read to get a more in-depth view on this..Thanks :)
@michaelhunter21366 жыл бұрын
Thanks Mark. That was a very concise yet clear explanation.
@petebondurant23362 жыл бұрын
Entertaining lecture and explanation. Thanks for that! Let's put deconstruction aside for a minute. Regarding the sign on the lift door, if you think about it it is pure genius to write sg like this. It does not matter if the blind person cannot read the sign as its purpose is to stop those who see to use the elevator with a dog.
@JaZoN_XD8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! You are so enthusiastic and you have great and clear explanations too! You helped me more on my project in just a few short minutes than reading an obscure and confusing booklet/package for a few hours!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Jason Jia Glad to help!
@farahaiman946 жыл бұрын
Thanks Mr Nance!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Helped a great deal!!!!! Keep doing what you do!!!!!
@qunfayaqun7775 жыл бұрын
Explained in the easiest way I have ever come across. Thanks.
@lazydaisy847 жыл бұрын
You make it look so simple! Thank you so much; I was really lost.
@TWard-ec1bc8 жыл бұрын
Thank sweet baby Jesus for you, man! I have been falling asleep in these books for hours and you made it click for me in 6 minutes and 51 seconds.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+T. Ward Glad I could help!
@letTheLifeFlow5 жыл бұрын
After watching 100 of videos and wasting my time you are first one who explaining in easy and great way ... Loved it sir.
@shamimahasan95306 жыл бұрын
If I got you at the initial stage of my graduation, I could make my CGPA bigger than what I obtained.Thank you so much for the way you explained.
@DarkAngelEU5 жыл бұрын
I remember a text by Derrida from the quote "there is only text" is derived. By reading that letter you can figure out that Deconstruction exists in the first place to point out that we are social creatures with a brain that is wired to figure out associations, thus creating context. It is because of our social nature that we are given constructions that become the carriers of meaning. We are limited by our social environment to discover our individual personality, to find out our true essence as human beings. To deconstruct means to question the social structures we are raised in and to use it against itself in order to cause change. It's fun with these examples but really, it's more fun to consume art that relates to these concepts like David Lynch, Agnes Varda, Andy Warhol, Duchamp, surrealism.
@harrissimo3 жыл бұрын
Finally I found somebody who explain deconstruction in a way I can actually understand. Thank You!
@mamoonaakram59314 жыл бұрын
I love the way you teaching... This is sooo amazing
@odettenassar5 жыл бұрын
You saved my life. Paper focused and worthy of an A. Thank you!
@brithomas94243 жыл бұрын
Yes! Thank you! I truly appreciate this video
@harpce18 жыл бұрын
Such a helpful, dynamic video on what's involved in a decon reading!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Caroline Cacahuète Glad you found it useful!
@riyapundir46768 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for clearing out my doubts and helping me sort out my head 😀You truly are a valuable asset to literature lovers.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Riya Pundir Glad to help! You're very kind.
@sojoudhojerat58534 жыл бұрын
You saved my life with your videos, thank you
@filipinoguru Жыл бұрын
Wow, ang video na ito ay talagang nakakatulong sa akin! Matagal na akong interesado sa paksa na ito, at ang iyong paliwanag ay talagang nakatulong sa akin na mas maintindihan ito. Pinapahalagahan ko ang iyong kahusayan at pagkahilig sa paksa na ito. Ako rin ay isang content creator, at nag-eexplore rin ako ng mga katulad na tema sa aking channel. Gusto ko makipag-ugnayan at magpalitan ng mga ideya sa mga taong may parehong interes. Keep up the good work!
@taqdisansari85235 жыл бұрын
You summarized Derrida in 15 seconds. I salute you!
@khairychebib46177 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!!! I finally understood deconstruction.
@jeromemanuel33277 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot! You explained it in such a simple way! Thanks a ton for using great examples!
@nicokos22058 жыл бұрын
You are just brilliant - thank you!!!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Nico Kos You're very kind!
@xmagi4eskiqx5 жыл бұрын
You're the only one on the Internet that made it understandable for me
@jermainebishop96265 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for breaking this down to a commoners understanding!
@marythelmajvp6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the explanation!
@Skycastle2 жыл бұрын
Such a wonderful informative video 🙌🏼🙏🏼
@orcasmicyt64234 жыл бұрын
these 6 minutes were much better than 45 minute Lecture👌❤
@sarahafeez87864 жыл бұрын
A minute in the video and already subscribed bc of how beautifully u explain the complex phenomenas!
@susmit14 жыл бұрын
Very helpful video for me. Thanks for clearing my all doubt .
@kg_khangelani3 жыл бұрын
Tyhuu! You explained deconstruction so well.
@d.89004 жыл бұрын
Hi, Sir! Please continue creating videos like this!!! 🙏😊
@14lier8 жыл бұрын
boy! you rock! that explanation was awesome! thank you
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Ruth Allio Oudri Thanks! Glad it helps!
@scottied2123 жыл бұрын
Great job buddy, thanks!
@surpriseworship37678 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tom ,ive been reading this topic for some time now and it really felt like i was reading a language from space, you explained it well in the shortest amount of time.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Surprise Worship Know what you mean! I spent plenty of hours struggling through its space language in college! It gets easier with practice though!
@yebinstudy25 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! It really helps me to understand deconstructions means! 😊😆
@maryam57598 жыл бұрын
deconstruction made me lose my sanity, that i'am thinking of marrying every person or every text that could explain it better.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Aki Sakura Is this a proposal? 'Cause I'm taken.
@maryam57598 жыл бұрын
+Tim Nance (NanceNotes and Narwhals) haha, it is totally a proposal! can you please do a video explaining what the heck does derrida( my sworn enemy) means by the cente being the center and not really a center?! :D
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Ha! Yeah, I know the feeling. When I was in Literary Theory in grad school, I loathed the man, but I've softened up to him a bit more now. He actually died while I was in the class, and I wasn't absolutely certain that it wasn't my hatred floated across the ocean and killed him. Anyway, the center that he's talking about is a point of reference that is inherent to the text--the idea that everything has an absolute meaning that we're basing all of our understanding upon. But then, he points out that that "center" is really just a figment of our imaginations. There is no point of reference or absolute in language for us to hang meaning on. Therefore, meaning is really pretty wishy-washy wobbly. And we can push and prod any statement until it falls apart and means nothing if we want to.
@maryam57598 жыл бұрын
Tim Nance thank you for replying! i have spend three days in undrestanding the theory of deconstruction and the center and all that blah blah, i almost gave up with a superficial understanding, especially that there is not enough materials to be able to study it more. PS: i will always loathe the guy. i can't forgive him, since he can't possibly apologize to all of us suffering undergraduate students.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Aki Sakura Well, best of luck! Here's to surviving!
@RufusMosis9 жыл бұрын
Man, that was awesome! Thank You.
@Nancenotes9 жыл бұрын
Rufus Mosis Glad you enjoyed it!
@adnanghanikhan6 жыл бұрын
Absolutely great Sir...
@ryanschmidt90666 жыл бұрын
This was a very confusing topic for me but your explanation is very clear and concise. Thanks!
@valarian44233 жыл бұрын
I'm a college student at Green river College and my English teacher asks us to use literary criticism without ever explaining what it it or what each type are. You are saving my grade.
@TheDutchMaurits8 жыл бұрын
I tried googling for deconstructionism and what it was, but I couldn't find any clear explanation. Then I came across this video. Thanks a lot, it's very clear now!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
TheDutchMaurits Glad I could help! This is a thumbnail sketch of the topic, and if you're interested, you should definitely dig deeper. You'll find a lot of extremely complicated texts on it, which are more irritating than helpful, but the one I'm using here--Text and Context by Steven Lynn--is excellent and user friendly. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to deconstruct any actual pieces of literature in this video. I often use music videos in my classroom as fun pieces for applying literary theory; we do Miranda Cosgrove's Dancing Crazy with decontruction because it basically deconstructs itself. Good luck with your continued exploration of the topic, and always feel free to ask me any questions!
@martnerby13 жыл бұрын
Great video! Sums it all up for me. Thank you Tim :)
@bernadettesamaniego81843 жыл бұрын
You discussed our full-semester course work in a very easy and comprehensive way. Thing which most of teachers won't do in formal class... hahahaaha! Your videos helped me soo much. Thank you.
@charlsedriebanquil67742 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr..
@kristinenielsen93628 жыл бұрын
I am a masters student of Danish literature and I have been reading many highly academic texts about "dekonstrktion" and I finally got it now. Thanks! I have an exam coming up where I hope to use it.... and after that exam I will leave it forever
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Good luck on the exam!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
By the way, a Masters in Danish lit sounds fantastic! What are some of the works you study?
@ashish__thakur6 жыл бұрын
Mind blowing teaching sir.......
@icanplaythepiano39396 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for this video!! So very helpful. I so wish you were my teacher!! Your students are exceptionally lucky to have such a wonderful teacher as you. Your channel, I’m sure, is helping tons of us out here! Thank you for sharing 😊😊🤗
@Nancenotes6 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@kenthefele1132 жыл бұрын
You’ve earned yourself another subscriber. Great explanation sir!
@bibliophileforever86878 жыл бұрын
I can't thank you enough for this video. You have succeeded in making a talk about theory interesting :)
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Yay! Glad you enjoyed it!
@Orochigirl178 жыл бұрын
thank you so much! this really helped me understand this theory after really struggling!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Orochigirl17 Glad to help! Let me know if you have any questions!
@gizemozturk51965 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!!!! 😭😭
@SS-qr7fm3 жыл бұрын
Thank u for ur succinct & precise explanation.
@Antebellum15167 жыл бұрын
this actually helped me more than my professors explanation of deconstruction. now to apply it to my final essay. . .
@onlandpirate5 ай бұрын
Great. And I liked the way you wrote Deconstruction. I'm going to copy/steal it.
@nylanablue2694 Жыл бұрын
i’m writing a conclusion for our group project and i’m crying….I REALLY ENJOYED LEARNING FROM THIS
@ashajane8 жыл бұрын
I'm writing an essay involving deconstruction and Miley Cyrus, and this was the first video I clicked on. When Nance started singing wrecking ball I couldn't believe it and now you're getting quoted!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Asha Jane Ha ha! Love it! My class usually deconstructs Miranda Cosgrove.
@ashajane8 жыл бұрын
+Tim Nance (NanceNotes and Narwhals) How does that usually turn out?
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
A little nudge and the whole thing falls apart.
@ashajane8 жыл бұрын
+Tim Nance (NanceNotes and Narwhals) My essay is going that way! However you explained it very well thank you!
@yeasirhabib1226 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir. This video is the only thing that helped me to get the idea regarding Deconstruction properly. WIsh you all the best :)
@jealouslilyt5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! helped a bunch!
@Nana03408 жыл бұрын
I love ur video so much ! Thank you!!!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+鄒易庭 Thanks! Glad I could help!
@ashleymewsick6 жыл бұрын
Taking a class on Contemporary Literary Theory right now and these videos are saving my life. Thank you for your talent and knowledge!! Subscribed :)
@justlookingyall70106 жыл бұрын
I thought that this is a very interesting approach, and your videos seem quite helpful and on point
@earsantig25906 жыл бұрын
I have a report about this thing and Ive been researching about deconstructionist criticism in google for hours and I'm still clueless. But thankfully I found this video, I definitely get it now thankyou so much!
@sarahalkhafaji12315 жыл бұрын
Thank you indeed for the useful videos
@dantelu76523 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot ... totally understood everthing
@zahraadirany61637 жыл бұрын
you are so funny. our doctors need alot of your way in demonstrating, especially the deconstruction theory 😂. big like
@Nancenotes7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@jotigiri17693 жыл бұрын
You are amazing. Your every video helped me🖤
@MrArdytube3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I have often heard the term “deconstruction” .... but it never before occurred to me to find out exactly what it means.
@aytekingurbanzade36554 жыл бұрын
wow, your explanation is much better than any book I ever read about decontstruction :))))
@hibalee84573 жыл бұрын
I want to say that this was perfect.
@farahatunnisa27892 жыл бұрын
Great teacher. Thank youuu. You saved my life in exam
@ZecaPinto16 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the explanation it helped a lot in studying for the exams
@MrPhigaluo7 жыл бұрын
Thank you, you beautiful man
@alhabibalmashoor4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I like your channel
@anjumaria97504 жыл бұрын
You are so amazing sir. Thankyou so much
@z.a.78463 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for this
@Hannah-ow6fn Жыл бұрын
your a great teacher dude
@ivanbalarezo92966 жыл бұрын
Nice video. I totally agree!
@mochitv10038 жыл бұрын
awesome explanation!!!
@frankiefarouk8 жыл бұрын
thank you so much, this is very helpful! cheers
@nuwanpeirissrilanka71453 жыл бұрын
At last somebody came out to explain it..... thank god
@shakespearaamina91174 жыл бұрын
Thank you🌷
@michelepatarino77138 жыл бұрын
Thank you TIm Nance for the way you explained Decsonstruction. It was entertaining, fun, and helped me tremendously in gaining a greater understanding of this particularly difficult theory. I am going to give a lesson in a few weeks on deconstruction and may use part of your video to motivate the class. Love it. Great work. Thank you!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Michele Patarino Glad I could help! Let me know if there's anything else I can do! What level do you teach?
@michelepatarino77138 жыл бұрын
I am going to be giving a lesson to about 12 other seniors at my university and teach deconstruction as if they were really in 10th grade. Still thinking of some fun activities.
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Good luck! Let me know what works; I'm always looking for new tricks!
@michelepatarino77138 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. Will do!
@ozdifferanceartozmate45618 жыл бұрын
+Michele Patarino Come see my painting when I post it on " Derrida s death " come see my unique art " La Differance" I bring the truth where Derrida failed there is a greater glory and journey come to explore my special God Glorious works the good Lord is my Teacher . ·
@shmars75808 жыл бұрын
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude. Thank you. I have been wrestling with Derrida's Differance for 8 weeks. I had almost given up hope, then I found this. THANK YOU FOR SAVING THIS MENTALLY CHALLENGED AUSTRALIAN POST-GRAD FILM STUDENT! My kids have hope of having a normal parent again soon-ish! I'd love to know if this is your real name and how to find any published works so I can cite you and this enlightening explanation correctly! NO PLAGIARISM HERE!!!! Seriously, thank you. This is truly awesome!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
+Sherrina Marshall Warner Lol! Glad I could help! Derrida actually died while I was in the middle of my literary theory class in grad school. It felt kinda symbolic... Timothy Nance is my real name, and I don't have any published writing that will be of any use to you (unless you want my cheesy YA novel and some poetry!), but you can cite this KZfaq video. Or I also suggest getting your hands on Text and Context, which I reference in the video. It's a bit pricey, being a textbook, but it's excellent and much more thorough than I am.
@ozdifferanceartozmate45618 жыл бұрын
+Tim Nance (NanceNotes and Narwhals) Come see my painting when I post it on " Derrida s death " come see my unique art " La Differance" I bring the truth where Derrida failed there is a greater glory and journey come to explore my special God Glorious works the good Lord is my Teacher .
@harleenkalra74546 жыл бұрын
What a great video!
@EyalKremer8 жыл бұрын
Bright and simply amazing! Thank you so much!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Glad I could help!
@greggfiller14 жыл бұрын
Deconstructionist: “All statements are devoid of meaning (except mine here, but please don’t notice that.”)
@draw4everyone4 жыл бұрын
How about this reformulation: "For all statements, truth value cannot be necessarily validated." There's no way to verify this statement as, similarly, there is no means to verify the totality of statements possible. All statements, then, are likely in a limbo, a proposition which itself is in a limbo because it cannot be verified.
@gregorykavivya8753 жыл бұрын
@@draw4everyone Christ! So we cant know whether anything is true? wtaf
@DuskAndHerEmbrace133 жыл бұрын
‘A person who says all truth is relative is asking you not to believe him, so don’t’
@soi46853 жыл бұрын
Deconstructionists arent relativist
@ouisellmedia3 жыл бұрын
@@soi4685 Really?
@pramilaluitel70203 жыл бұрын
I'm so happy and fuzzy 🤭 hahah.. you teach so simply and so well 🙌 we need more teachers like you, won't miss a single class 😅
@leoraglavigna9216 Жыл бұрын
thank you so much sir!
@mjjbiggs20204 жыл бұрын
This is perfect thank you
@haneeza24223 жыл бұрын
You are a Genius.
@laylarabie21993 жыл бұрын
Great explanation! Thanks!
@laisarosaa8 жыл бұрын
that was extremely helpful, thank you so much!
@Nancenotes8 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@Jixnq Жыл бұрын
My profesor explains this like explaining sth from outer space I just didnt get it. However, you explained it very well I finally understood what it is about. Thank you.
@stopretending2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this!
@Nancenotes2 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome!
@artemisamethyst16433 жыл бұрын
You taught this much better than my university professor.