Better than my lecturers slides, thanks !

I always wanted write about that, but did not have a name for it 😆. I think the most influential intertextuality i have seen is the use of religous icons in advertising, politics and entertainment.

I started to read Baudrillard, and had some familiarity with his overall concepts, but I felt that I needed a more 'soft' introduction to get me going and so this video did it for me. Very clear with a lot of visual examples. So that's a subscribe for me. Thanks!

Your videos are inspring and gives the core of information without fluness of buzzwords thanks

Thank you for the nice video. It was very helpful!!

As someone obsessed with prestige shows like mad men and succession Thankyou for showing me I’m not crazy and giving me a word to describe what I know I’m seeing that isn’t subtext or Easter eggs

Omg this video unbelievably helped SO MUCH for my uni assessment. Thank you!!

Very clear and well done video! I'm just curious about something because I watched a different video, and it was a little unclear about how intertextuality works. You pointed out how Star Wars brought back those cantina characters for a sequel, and that is a direct intertextual link. Would the new Star Wars movies bringing back the Millenium Falcon be considered intertextuality or just following up with something in their canon? Basically: Does intertextuality apply to any reference to another piece of media, including bringing back characters from previous films, or is it confined specifically to less commonplace references?

I'd like your thoughts on this: I could be wrong here, but I would argue that there is actually no such thing as "indirect" intertextuality. I think the purpose of calling it either direct or indirect is really just to refer to the spectrum of severity with which the intertextuality is present. If we are to say that direct intertextuality is "on purpose", does that dictate that "indirect" intertextuality is "by accident"? I would say no. No matter the severity or degree of the reference, the reference is still there, meaning the producer of it still intended for it to be there. By that logic, I would say that splitting intertextuality into those two categories is redundant. What do you think??

Reminds me of an essay I read about "Anatomy of Influence" by Harold Bloom.

Damn. SUBSCRIBED snd SHARING! Ty so much for this.

Thanks for the interesting video! Very cool. I have to say I'm a little confused because you mention Who Run the World as an example of indirect reference, yet list the USS Callister episode of Black Mirror as direct reference. I haven't seen either of those videos in full, but based on your samples here, they look similar enough to their original texts (Mad Max and Star Trek, respectively) yet aren't an exact recreation, that they seem like they'd fit into the same category (direct or indirect). What exactly is the difference? And I need to find me that He-Man Dirty Dancing video. That's hysterical!!

Lovely video

you literally just saved me

thanks a lot for the explanation !!!

THANK YOU VERYYYY MUCH

love these video! so useful

thank you for your nice video it was helpful for my activity 😊

Would enjoy a discussion about whether the Star Wars crawl is indirect, because Lucas has said many times that SW was inspired by the Saturday serials that he saw in the theater, like Flash Gordon. It's pretty certainly intentional, but doesn't reference Flash Gordon...dos that make it indirect? 🤔

very helpful more than my lectures slides

thanks

Thank you:)

Can you make a video about how to use Intertextuality when writing an analysis please

Thanks so much for this

Fast forward to 2024 and Generative AI has become the penultimate distillation of indirect intertextuality.

Nice video!

This feels like the bible tradition, we chinese have that sort of technique in our poetry reading a poem reference to another, it creats a sense of sublime creditability, for it is not done by "me" but by "other" , in the biblical sense is the biggest other "god", so it must be ttue

Awesome vid

0:31

Thankyou Mate

Shalom mr hog

Are indirect references always accidental?

Is homage the same thing???

Gordon Freeman from Half Life!

to put Plagiarism in different genre..it is intertextuality, as i perceive it. In other words, put a mood and tone, culture, race, presentations, time ans space in different context of its original. Actually, what is original according to postmodernist...lol

Sir, you're Albert Einstein of media and gender studies. Kudos

I would take his class.

Smells like a ten dollar word for possible copyright infringement.

Yes, we know what it is….really, why do we need a new, made up word? No, really. At first, I thought this video was a really funny spoof….which it may still be 🙂