WHAT is the Richat Structure / The Eye of the Sahara / Guelb er Richat and HOW was it formed?

Рет қаралды 46,686

Күн бұрын

WHAT is the Richat Structure - The Eye of the Sahara - Guelb er Richât and HOW was it formed? // The Richat Structure (The Eye of the Sahara) is a deeply eroded geologic dome in the Sahara Desert in Mauritania, Africa. The Eye of the Sahara is a large circular geological formation whose birth started over 100 million years ago with the splitting of Pangaea. The supercontinent of Pangea started splitting about 200 million years ago because of plate tectonics. As the landmasses that eventually became today’s continents started separating, the lithosphere in the area of the Richat Structure started weakening. Because of that, the magma beneath it started pushing the crust upwards, forming a geologic dome made of igneous and sedimentary rocks. The erosion of this dome, a process that span 100 million years, led to the formation of the cliffs (less eroded areas made of harder, igneous rocks) and valleys (more severely eroded areas made of softer, sedimentary rocks) we can see today in the Richat Structure. The Eye of the Sahara is a fascinating geological wonder of our planet, not just in its sight, but also in its history.
Subscribe to my newsletter and get updates on my upcoming Sci-Fi & Fantasy novels, my creative journey, & updates on new Wonders of Heritage videos: www.mariabaias.com/newsletter
My blog: www.mariabaias.com/blog
Timecodes:
0:00 - Intro to The Richat Structure (The Eye of the Sahara)
1:00 - What is The Richat Structure?
1:43 - What The Eye of the Sahara is not
2:02 - How was The Richat Structure formed?
2:49 - What is plate tectonics?
4:01 - The erosion of The Richat Structure dome
5:07 - Why does the Richat Structure have its current shape?
5:24 - What are igneous rocks?
My blog post on “What is the Richat Structure - "The Eye of the Sahara”?” - www.mariabaias.com/post/what-...
What are diamonds and how are they formed video - • What are diamonds made...
Colored sand beaches video - • COLORED SAND BEACHES -...
Connect with me on social media:
Instagram: / authormariabaias
Twitter: / netanmr
Facebook: / netanmr
About me: My name is Maria Baias and I’m a scientist turned Sci-Fi/Fantasy writer. While teaching a university course on Inorganic Chemistry, I became fascinated by minerals and rocks and the role they play in shaping interesting geological formations. That, combined with my research background in Heritage Science are what led to my interests in using science to explore and understand the wonders of our planet. I’m happy to share those stories with the rest of the world through this channel and my blog: www.mariabaias.com/blog
#naturalheritage #geology #sahara
Resources:
"Eye Of The Sahara or Richat Structure": geologyscience.com/gallery/ey...
“What Is the Eye of the Sahara?”: www.thoughtco.com/eye-of-the-...
“Eye Of The Sahara or Richat Structure”: geologyscience.com/gallery/ey...
Richat Structure - NASA Earth Observatory: earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ima...
“RICHAT STRUCTURE, THE EYE OF THE SAHARA DESERT”: www.mybestplace.com/en/articl....
“Pangea”: www.britannica.com/place/Pangea
“Plate Tectonics”: education.nationalgeographic....
Music: "Up Kilkenny (Instrumental version)" by Josh Woodward. Free download: joshwoodward.com/

Пікірлер: 224

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching! I hope you enjoyed learning about the Richat Structure. Let me know which geological wonder of our planet you'd like to learn about.

@RocketGator05 Жыл бұрын

you and Bright Insight need to collab on this. He's got some good research

@shauny2146 Жыл бұрын

Bright insight

@jamesmcguire6706 Жыл бұрын

There's a lot more information out there. Do not even speak of it and just give the old main stream idea is not going to grow your channel. If you can scientifically dismiss their claims that's fine but do not even speak on it is very CNN of you.

@cedarwaxwing3509 Жыл бұрын

I’d like to know more about Devil’s Tower in Wyoming, USA. The glib “it’s an old volcano “ don’t hold up. The rock there is actually a large phenocryst porphyry, which suggests deep intrusion and cooling, not near surface or extrusive cooling. Also, there are other outcrops of the same rock within twenty miles or so of DT, suggesting all of these structures were fed by a deep magma chamber. But given the exotic composition of the rocks and their odd, columnar cooling profile, there is something unique about the origin of the magma.

@joshi6898 10 ай бұрын

Don't worry I'm going to make another video about my theory that is was actually built by termites. Its not Atlantis but a termite colony.

@deptusmechanikus7362 Жыл бұрын

Finally! A video about Richat Structure that's not another clickbaity Atlantis hoax nonsense. Thank you

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

I'm so happy to see that some people appreciate the science-based explanation of the Richat Structure!

@noban2730 Жыл бұрын

Thanks, was trying to find a video that wasn't all about Atlantis lol

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! I'm happy to see that there are some people who are interested in the scientific explanation. 🙂

@KuroItami Жыл бұрын

me too! it was very interesting and informative, thank you

@ConstantineJoseph Жыл бұрын

It’s Atlantis bro

@ClarkBark14 11 ай бұрын

Or provided by Joe Rogan...

@docfortune 11 ай бұрын

Same.

@kamlee4010 Жыл бұрын

Your video was very informative and interesting . Thank you for sharing this with us . I just watched Itchy Boots earlier in season 7 episode 22 riding right through this eye on her motorcycle . She is a geologist who has ride thousands of miles around different continents. She very good at history and explains the science behind the events , structures , minerals , gemstones and the beauty of this earth in her videos

@waynemachan4732 Жыл бұрын

Yes, thats why I watched this ! Lol..

@tezzrterry7485 Жыл бұрын

The Itchy Boots video shows that it is a non event at ground level. Not Atlantis.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! I'm happy to hear you found it interesting.

@kamlee4010 Жыл бұрын

@@MariaBaiasHeritage I appreciate all good videos that are well researched and informative.. best wishes and thanks for your reply

@Sebastian_19876 Жыл бұрын

Thank you Maria, is amazing that after all the years i knew about this, is the first time I watch a video with the genuine explanation a no a clickbait about some myth.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching! I'm happy to hear you are interested in the science-based explanation of the structure.

@priztucker Жыл бұрын

I think we all agree that the concentric circles do not seem so natural. Can you verify that this occurs naturally throughout the Sahara?

@najeemworldwide Жыл бұрын

Amazing!!!

@hereBDBD Жыл бұрын

excellent - thank you!

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you! I'm glad you enjoyed it!

@francisnjie1586 Жыл бұрын

Just watched itchy boots as well so you vlog was really helpful. Thanks

@franciscoramossanchez9577 Жыл бұрын

Excelente video, keep it up the good work !!! I am a new suscriber

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you! And thanks for subscribing! 🙂

@thomasmaughan4798 Жыл бұрын

Anyone else here after seeing Itchy Boot's drone video of the Richat Structure or Eye of Africa or Eye of Sahara?

@awesome382 Жыл бұрын

Thank you , you rock!

@frankdillon6127 Жыл бұрын

motorcycle blogger itchy boots just went there a day ago, a must see video.

@jacobmygindpedersen1138 Жыл бұрын

Cool!😊

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! 🙂

@jamielandis4606 Жыл бұрын

Super interesting! I never heard of this before.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! I also find the Eye of the Sahara very interesting. And there are so many more fascinating natural formations on Earth to explore!

@RocketGator05 Жыл бұрын

check out Bright Insight's research on this. He makes the argument that it might be Atlantis. Pretty thought provoking

@MahamRaza Жыл бұрын

Very informative @maria mam I really likes your lectures

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you! I'm happy to hear you like my videos! 🙂

@MahamRaza Жыл бұрын

@@MariaBaiasHeritage My pleasure ❤️

@jessicasinclair323 Жыл бұрын

Very well explained

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you! 😊

@user-yw8zw9qw3r 5 ай бұрын

Thanks you

@bearlogg7974 5 ай бұрын

You can tell something stood there at one point and that whatever it was got swept away by flood & wind erosion thousands of years ago

@Avensur Жыл бұрын

Fascinating indeed 😮!!! It just gives you the desire to be in the middle of it. The Cradle of Civilization. But I will need a lot of fuel water, and food to reach it. An incredible adventure. Thanks my friend.

@SA-bc6jw Жыл бұрын

I might never have heard of this had your video not been favored by the algorithms. Thank you for teaching us.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

I'm happy to hear the algorithms favored it and it reached a wider audience. Thank you for watching! 🙂

@hattershouse710 Жыл бұрын

You should listen to the Joe Rogan podcast. They talk about things like this all the time. "Bright Insight" youtube channel has the most info on this.

@MECKATRON 10 ай бұрын

You talk with such conviction as if you were there when it happened. The genies have a different story but your story is satisfactory enough for those that came to see it

@lovewalruss 9 ай бұрын

Thanks

@ilovemyplug8454 Жыл бұрын

subscribed :)

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for subscribing! 🙂

@janhutten3 Жыл бұрын

Thanks Maria.🌍

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! 🙂

@jonilehtonen69 Жыл бұрын

Hey! I would be really interested in learning about fake art spotting techniques. I'm guessing there's the basic radiocarbon dating, identifying materials used back in the time. I would truly enjoy an overly detailed video about the subject!

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Hi Joni, thanks for the suggestion on a video about fake art spotting techniques. I already have a video on this topic, discussing the various scientific methods we can use in detecting art forgeries. In case you haven’t seen it, here’s the link: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9B4aqt0ranIqWw.html . I don’t think I’ll be coming back to the topic in the near future, but if you’re more interested in using radiocarbon dating for detecting art forgeries, here’s an interesting article where they used radiocarbon dating on an alleged painting by Fernand Léger, and they proved it was a fake (link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/i2014-14006-6). In case you don’t have access to that article, here’s an open access article that talks about identifying art forgeries by radiocarbon dating: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613090/

@Funckle73 7 ай бұрын

Love her!

@stig Жыл бұрын

I was just there for my 2nd time. If you don't believe me then check my work. I was there a few days ago. BTW. It's not dome geology.

@baysideauto Жыл бұрын

Hey sir love your channel, it seems she does not have open mind about this, thank for all your hard work

@rickyspanish69420. Жыл бұрын

It's nice to find a video not about Atlantis lol

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

It's nice to have viewers who are interested in the scientific details behind the Richat Structure.

@geogarces Жыл бұрын

Is the Ricaht have any matches patterns of Atlantae. I saw an old roman map with Atlanteans in the sahara, Mauratania.

@mikehunt7810 9 ай бұрын

Any reading you'd recommend on the subject?

@KrixoniusPlays 9 ай бұрын

Maria you mentioned pangea, i have a question, do you think as the plates are now would rasing or lowering the water change the shape of the continents at all? With a maximum depth of only about 46 feet (14 m), the Azov is the world's shallowest sea. There are many examples around the world. What do you think?

@hihihello263 Жыл бұрын

Do you know if there is another example similar to what happened to Richard structure anywhere in our solar system? Thanks in advance 🙏🏻

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

I haven't seen anything related to this while researching the Richat Structure, but I wasn't looking specifically for other structures in the solar system.

@thomasmaughan4798 Жыл бұрын

A similar feature, much smaller, exists in Utah in the United States; it is called Upheaval Dome and is believed to be a salt dome or intrusion rather than magma intrusion.

@Bimmer_MD Жыл бұрын

So just curious, I have a question, & I apologize in advance this kind of long winded. According to you, the Richat is the eroded remnants of a dome of igneous rock (kimberlite, rhyolite, carbonatite, black basalt) and sandstone. 1st sandstone is a sedimentary so it would not have anything to do with the original geological formation, but it would have settled into any voids in the igneous formation as time passed. Next, in the video that you referenced, it explains that diamonds are typically produced among kimberlite formation. Given that the the mineral surrounding the diamonds would be going through a very similar geological process I would believe that the surrounding elements would develop somewhat similar characteristics. Resulting in a tough durable mineral that would at least be comparable to diamond. Last, 3 out of the 4 minerals that you say that are found are kimberlite, basalt, and rhyolite. All of which are extremely similar to granite. Granite very resistant to wind and rain erosion. Look at Half-dome in California. It is an igneous formation that's estimated to be around 83 million years old and shows very little signs of erosion in comparison to that of the Richat. Another geological example that brings doubt to your hypothesis is Uluru in Australia. Uluru is estimated to be 1/2 a billion years old. The big difference is that Uluru is sandstone which is highly susceptible to rain & wind erosion. Yet, it is also nowhere near the state of erosion of the Richat. So my question is, if the Richat is compromised of these very durable minerals, how is it that the have degraded so far beyond any other comparable geological formations?

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Hi Kevin, here's an article from "Geology Science" that goes deeper into the details about the rocks and the formation of the dome: geologyscience.com/gallery/eye-of-the-sahara-or-richat-structure/. I hope this helps answer your questions.

@stig Жыл бұрын

@@MariaBaiasHeritage I bet none of the writers of that have actually gone there.

@ChrisBrown-hr6mc Жыл бұрын

It’s because of flooding and water erosion that the richat is weathered that way

@driverguy7 3 күн бұрын

Please examine, study, and investigate the Yonaguni Structures that are underwater south of Japan in the Pacific ocean, that appear manmade, but may not be. Thank you!

@damedesmontagnes 8 ай бұрын

I theorize that the concentric ring formation is due to the vibratory alignment of matter as in cymatics and spherical standing waves.

@NickVenture1 Жыл бұрын

Well explained. Now I must check when the large meteorite hit the earth which destroyed the Dinosaurs on earth. Because that impact area is now located in central America. Was the impact area origininaly located on the single land mass of the one continent and since shifting to the place where we see it now?

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you! That’s a very good question. The dinosaurs were wiped out sixty-six million years ago. By that time, Pangaea had already started breaking apart, and the continents were closer to their current positions, rather than the original landmass. Here’s an animation of how Pangaea broke over time (kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbF8m69ev7G3pmw.html) and you can see where the contents were at the time of the meteorite impact. But, the continents were still drifting at the disappearance of the dinosaurs, so there was still an increased activity of tectonic plates and lots of volcanic activity, all of these factors influencing the climate. So the dinosaurs lived (and died) during pretty harsh times of the planet. Here’s an article that provides more details about this topic: www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/how-an-asteroid-caused-extinction-of-dinosaurs.html

@NickVenture1 Жыл бұрын

@@MariaBaiasHeritage Thank you for the explanation. 65 Million years ago.. that's quite recently, indeed.

@niccapetown Жыл бұрын

Can you do one on Table Mountain? How it came to be etc.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you for suggesting this topic. I've added it to my list of future videos.

@ClarkBark14 11 ай бұрын

The salt shelfs in the gulf of Mexico would be a great vid.

@MariaBaiasHeritage 10 ай бұрын

Thank you for the suggestion! This sounds like an interesting topic. I'll search for the scientific explanation and add it to the list of future videos.

@ClarkBark14 10 ай бұрын

@@MariaBaiasHeritage "shelfs" was probably the wrong wording. I don't remember the proper name, but enormous volumes of salt were deposited as Pangea split and sea water filled. Very interesting geography along the Sigsbee Escarpment.

@Chronically_ChiII 2 ай бұрын

3:30 what did you say? The "little sphere"? Why didn't it weaken?

@floydcrase625 Жыл бұрын

The structure seems far from the continental plates edge for that theory has the volcanic rocks been dated? The oldest rocks are on top? In the middle? From what I have seen (second hand) is its more like it was forced down and the magma forced it back up hence the almost vertical sedimentary layers forming the rings

@aboukalil 3 ай бұрын

Is this an ancien Hydron colider that was accidently exploded abd distroyed atlantis ?

@Prifly70 Жыл бұрын

I'm so glad you didn't bring up Atlantis, thank you for factual information on the structure. Its amazing how many channels just have clickbait garbage about the eye.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! I'm happy to see that some of my viewers are interested in factual information and not speculation.

@michaelzane3823 Жыл бұрын

It is the location of Atlantis though, the proof is undeniable

@barbarosa3d239 Жыл бұрын

@@michaelzane3823 The mountains up north even inherited Atlas name.. the great flood and tsunami is still more reasonable theory for me, than 100 million years of process. I still did not find the answer why it is formed in concentric circles...

@Kmarad_ Жыл бұрын

I'm not fond of pseudo-science theory about this, but those tectonic plates building a nearly perfect circle doesn't seem too realistic in my opinion either. Every mountain was created because of tectonic plates right ? How come none are that circular ? By the way, if it was a dome, why is it below the ground around it ? I'd rather think of a volcano, but then that geological formation would be higher. So then maybe a meteorite ? Tectonic plates building a dome makes no sense at all to me. Please would someone care to explain in details how ?

@macdmacd7896 Жыл бұрын

superhero landing.

@TrollBot. Жыл бұрын

Muy bien! According to underrated science and according to ancient astronaut theoriest, the Ritchat structure is also the capital of what Plato called Atlantis!

@agriffin5308 Жыл бұрын

I agree.

@ajitparkar9059 Жыл бұрын

I dont think its natural

@jom4752 Жыл бұрын

Agreed. There is proven evidence that it was the site of Atlantis washed away by a possible tidal wave moving from the Mediterranean across to the Atlantic Ocean some 10k years ago

@jinoshiosote4049 11 ай бұрын

That's what I understood it to be

@jinoshiosote4049 11 ай бұрын

@@jom4752 Yes. That's probably where the whole mythos of Atlantis being underwater comes from. The fact that it was literally under water because of the tsunami.

@stig Жыл бұрын

05:08 What is this thing you keep showing here? It isn't the Richat Structure.

@Zorton_ 7 ай бұрын

There's another eye of the Sahara. In Chad! 19°0542°N 19°14'46"E It's has rings just like the other eye of the Sahara. Please check it out and talk about it. I see it as very relevant. Thank you 🙏🏼 Love the channel ❤

@brianvernon249 5 ай бұрын

This was re-discovered by NASA. They used it as a marker.

@jenbraga9372 Жыл бұрын

We need to dig under there!!

@rachelcox5290 Жыл бұрын

I'd like to know about what created the Big Horn Basin in Wyoming.

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your suggestion! I've added this topic to my list of future videos.

@rachelcox5290 Жыл бұрын

@Maria Baias Awesome. Can you tell me what caused the crater directly West of the Richat at 21°00'57"N 11°49'55"W?

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Sorry, I couldn't find any scientific information specifically on this smaller crater.

@rachelcox5290 Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@douglasboone3790 Жыл бұрын

I can not figure-out, how to operate this Gravity Manipulation Device, because the instructions are all written in Hieroglyphics`.

@andrewbresee2969 Жыл бұрын

Great video, thank you! There are so many videos out there, convinced that the structure was Atlantis. But I’m a skeptic, and your video helped propose a different, and much more likely, explanation. Keep it up!

@StargazerTheFurry Жыл бұрын

It's not "much more likely" this is literally the fact and truth on how it was formed lol, there are many scientific papers out there stating so.

@andrewbresee2969 Жыл бұрын

@@StargazerTheFurry Ehh, no. All historical theories are conjecture. Some are just more likely than others. "In science, theories never become facts. Rather, theories explain facts. [A big] misconception is that scientific research provides proof of attaining the absolute truth. Scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision should new evidence come to light."

@jamesdaviesanswers8751 Жыл бұрын

@@StargazerTheFurry no it’s not.

@boxxylegoplaymobil8906 2 ай бұрын

it just seems way too specific to be natural. i'd be curious to see if theres anything else like it anywhere on our planet as the natural process described seems to be incredibly rare, especially on the scale of the richat structure.

@soundcoreclassics4367 Жыл бұрын

I don't believe this, how can u explain the structure found in the area.

@octavio318 Жыл бұрын

HI can you explain how the mount Roraima was formed ? thank you for the excellent video

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching! I'm happy to hear you enjoyed the video. And thank you for the video suggestion!

@develentsai3215 Жыл бұрын

Atlantisian just left the room:)

@shawnmccarthy4022 2 ай бұрын

Is that why some people believe in flat eart and round earth because we used to be one land mass

@pubuapubua 11 ай бұрын

Hey! Factuality!!!

@joeykimble62 Жыл бұрын

I want to see a video about the "rainbow mountians" in china. It'll make for a great thumbnail

@MariaBaiasHeritage Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much for the suggestion! This is definitely going on my list of future videos for when I get back to creating KZfaq videos after taking a break.

@deandee8082 Жыл бұрын

lol at dome, it's a mothership footprint... yup of just one of the 3 landing legs ...

@bambootheleafwingwhototall3757 Жыл бұрын

Thoth the Atlantean of the Emerald Tablets said two of the three islands sank and one moved, I believe it was to Afrika.

@Heather.Isaiah43.1 5 күн бұрын

Thanks! Wanted to learn more after my Haunted Cosmos podcast mentioned it 💛 I hope one day you come to a knowledge and understanding of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Blessings to you

@shauny2146 Жыл бұрын

I really like this idea and it’s so cool .. just asking because there is obviously an alternative explanation.. is jimmy corsetti and Randal Carlson wrong because he is not a geologist? Or does he have some valid points to consider an alternative?

@barleyarrish Жыл бұрын

If we quote a 'Theory' we are not quoting 'established fact'. You did not mention 'Electrical Discharge' and 'Plasma' as a causal factor, or establish why you chose the date for the formation. If you study the Satellite Photographs you can clearly see that there is a large East to West pattern which follows the low lying land from Mediterranean to the Atlantic. This would appear to be hard evidence of a catastrophe that reduced the historically fabled green paradise of the Sahara to the Desert we see today, Which of course would suggest a much more recent date, possibly only 5-7000 years ago.

@blackheart4360 Жыл бұрын

Its Alantis.

@_ingoknito 11 күн бұрын

3:34

@juarawebcom298 Жыл бұрын

How to proof its happened 100millions years ago? Is there any other Richat Structure existed?

@jdubs681 4 ай бұрын

Thank you for being logical and not trying to make a dumb story about Atlantis

@scottoman Жыл бұрын

i see an ancient civilization

@timcarpenter7399 Жыл бұрын

Atlantis

@uncletom1971 9 ай бұрын

So it's like a ... giant pimple?

@stevelacombe5291 Жыл бұрын

It looks like an open pit mine.

@sonyalindee8676 Жыл бұрын

I am fascinated by Pangea. I do not agree by the visual how all land mass was on one side of the earth. What if during the formation of earth it was originally a water planet then as the moon was formed in the giant impact theory the amazing amount of heat generated on the surface of the planet caused expansion. We all know that heat expands and cold contracts. Then what was once below the surface of the waters expanded to become The continents. I think this would better explain the eye of the Sahara. ☄️🌖🌍

@jason_m_schmidt622 Жыл бұрын

So skinny earth became “thicc” earth 😂

@timothyappleseed2986 Жыл бұрын

There is no way all the land could be on one side and the water on the other. If that was the case the water would simply cover all the land.

@sonyalindee8676 Жыл бұрын

@@timothyappleseed2986 maybe this translated wrong for you. I said I did not agree with the land mass only on one side of the earth. But that the earth itself was entirely covered in water and the single land mass was below the surface. With the occurrence of the giant impact theory When the moon formed during a collision between the Earth and another small planet about the size of mars. You and I know that heat expands and cold contracts. As the heat from this collision occurred the Structure of the Earth expanded out from the waters. Of course this is just a theory as everything is only an idea not a proven fact.

@timothyappleseed2986 Жыл бұрын

@Sonya Lindee thanks for the reply. Of course we are all working out theories based on how we understand the laws of nature. I don't see the moon separating from the earth either though. The texture of the earth is 1/1000 of the diameter of the earth including the sea floors. That's like laying a human hair on a cue ball. The moon is much smoother. If the moon had separated from the earth due to some impact, neither would be as smooth or even as round as they are.

@timothyappleseed2986 Жыл бұрын

The shorelines were actually formed with giant bulldozers. If you want to know more about that hit me up on Facebook. Maybe a can do a video about it together.

@brandonHines76 Жыл бұрын

this is one of the examples that I believe the scientific speculation is completely wrong... we live in a day where we are finding out human civilization (presumably) have been around far longer that we assumed, science community is so close minded they develop these.. unlikely contrivances to explain things they can't... its a giant assumption. Stamped with believe us, because you have to, don't think about it, we will for you.

@kennethutz4205 Жыл бұрын

I appreciate you validating the structure as Natural. It would seem way easier to create Atlantis if Mother Nature had it laid out already.

@alecstevens8467 11 ай бұрын

its not atlantis

@whysthat6675 8 ай бұрын

I believe it's atlantis.

@madalinmaximilian6899 Жыл бұрын

Its not a natural formation .. Pls do more research

@elitestockpicks8212 16 күн бұрын

I am wondering if we can go there.

@n2datasolutions443 Жыл бұрын

The richard structure is atlantis, I saw a documentary on this so it must be true

@ad3ly Жыл бұрын

Natural formation.. yea, sure..

@gpasprimus6505 Жыл бұрын

In time immemorial titans existed now you have there remains it is the eye of the dragons that swam the ancient oceans many forms you call mountains are titans uluru in Australia is a heart of one of them observe its vein structures

@m.barcalow4813 Жыл бұрын

Never in 100,000,000 years would I ever belive your synopsis for a 25 mile wide perfect concentric circle to form naturally. This is a man made event.

@deandee8082 Жыл бұрын

all rock valleys mountains we see on this planet was once molten lava.. good grief

@thebunz7 Жыл бұрын

Not a natural formation as not recreated anywhere on Earth or elsewhere. Something sentient created this which excites the imagination.

@HeatherRose_ Жыл бұрын

It's a petrified tree stump.

@MidnightDesperado66 Жыл бұрын

Didn't Plato describe this as the city of Atlantis? Three circles of land and two of water, with a opening to the sea of the south and with mountains to the north called Atlas?

@koralite3953 Жыл бұрын

"natural formation" i am skeptical

@suspretorius3107 Жыл бұрын

Um you might want to go and watch a youtube channel called bright insight 😄

@lorenpunk83 Жыл бұрын

What’s up with all the salt there?

@sufferingduckman 8 ай бұрын

Oh. My. Goodness. Um... wow. No.

@biseboy9062 Жыл бұрын

Thats Atlantis.

@carsonroeser9079 9 ай бұрын

Nah bro it’s Atlantis! Source: Joe Rogan.

@PeeedaPan Жыл бұрын

You need to read about Atlantis. This is the proven location of an ancient advanced civilization circa 11,000 BCE that was flooded after rapid melting of the polar ice caps caused massive sea level rise and was due to a giant asteroid that hit Greenland. Fascinating stuff

@lllllsp1d3rlllll 4 ай бұрын

Bs rocks don't form that way this video goes against what we know about geology and weathering

@trout3685 Жыл бұрын

Three years ago, World of Antiquity posted a video debunking claims that this structure is Atlantis. Also, bright insight just posted a new video on the richat structure so more trolls are likely to come. I hope they see this comment.

@prabowotarantula524 Жыл бұрын

why didn't mention anything about atlantis

@trout3685 Жыл бұрын

Welcome to the real world.

@MrPenny794 Жыл бұрын

That’s what I am telling these people that desert it was water, but not very high water. The rocks come from the sky round full of heat, and make that circle we are human we supposed to know more than anyone without going to school or graduate or whatever we already live in inside the place we have everything around us working telephone iPhone, laptop, desktop cars, TV, electric we are slender inside this technology we supposed to be smart ass, not stupid ass. Sorry to say that.

@stepper8584 Жыл бұрын

"A super mega long long long time ago, we guess probably something like this happened" is not truely scientific, so I think it's a bit misplaced to use language as if it's fact. Also, or better yet, especially scientists should be very careful what language they use, because often science teachers speak as if things that are highly speculative are science fact. That being sad, thanks for making this video and giving a nice video explaining this hypothesis.