all happens in 24 frames

Well he is batman, what do you expect?

Player: * presses punch button * Batman: * blasts off into the marvel universe and bitch slaps thanos *

Spiderman is a funny guy

Player: connects microphone Batman: time travels to kill kratos

Ser Xarthilias awesome mate, thanks for that!

Disagree. The most satisfying combat is the combat where I can unleash hell (mostly) uninterupted. See the DMC series. But I do agree that simply giving enemies hyper armour is the worst shit in gaming since triple A. Platinum games are so much anti-fun because you cannot finish a combo as the enemy gets hyper armour halfway through and you either dodge or get your face smashed in. Fuck those games.

+

Clemens Cohn Feel like that's where preference comes in. I prefer having a dance with my opponent via dodges, parries and interruptions. An example would be MH, I can dish out some crazy damage with cool animations, but only after I stagger/mount the monster which is a reward of patience and observation. I like games like GoW but the lack of a threat makes me less inclined to play it. If you have anything to add about GoW, I'd like to hear it.

Big reason why I was so impressed with God Hand, they get wise to your crap especially if it gets repetitive by blocking, parrying or dodging; however, a good player can use the different tools in their moveset to stun, trip, or launch the enemy into a state where they're unable to defend. Mostly. Doing all this while managing multiple enemies makes even the first fight pretty hectic.

he also talks about Bayonetta's animation cancelling into a dodge and doesn't even show an example of that happening. the editing in this video is pretty bad, cuz a lot of the footage isn't related to what he's talking about beyond showing any random clip of the game in question.

"small" weapons in a lot of games happen to be several times larger than practical historical weapons

@@realIanIANian "smallest" does not mean "small"

@@StriderWolf exactly he should really read comments and see this criticism if he is to improve otherwise he's gonna be one of those channels that make content for the sake of money and not really paying much attention to what they preach. I doubt much of these gaming channels even play these games or if it's even their game play they show. Such a shame really

@@z.a.y.n-5053 This... isn't a gaming channel though. As far as I'm aware, it's aimed at developers. His goal isn't to show off these mechanics and how cool they can be, but to explain their effect on gameplay and on the player themselves

Devil May cry does this

Not sure if damage lessens in DMC, but if all you do is use the same couple of moves after a short while those moves will stop generating style points.

Let's not forget about the inverse possibility; in another episode of GMTK, Mark cites that another (in some cases better) way to keep players on a certain path is to _reward_ them for playing a certain way rather than to _punish_ them for playing another. Not that there's anything wrong with how stale moves work as they do now (huge props to Sakurai for such an ingenious idea); but imagine if instead of some moves doing less damage when used repeatedly, all moves could do MORE damage the more diversity a player could use throughout a single combo. Of course, depending on how that's scaled, it might be a better fit for a single-player game like DMC or GoW than a PVP fighting game like Smash or Street Fighter, but the idea definitely makes ME giddy with excitement. Heck, maybe it'd even do wonders for a turn-based RPG in which players often find themselves casting the same overpowered spells over and over again.

@@CapnShades Staling works better for comboing. A lighter hit from a stale move won't send the opponent as far or damage them quite as much, thus adding to combo potential, where as what you're talking about would end combos if they received more damage or a "reward" for mixing it up.

@@Sumatchi Precisely

Hi brony

@@concernedcommenter8258 What's a brony

@@Mr.Jubilation A fan of the show My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. It's a fandom fan name.

@@concernedcommenter8258 K, thanks my dude I'm giving you a sub for that

@@Mr.Jubilation Hope you like 80s classic rock! 🤟

That game is top tier

Thing is attacks from Furi do feel as hard as a truck with the camera shake and everything, I'm not saying Transformers doesn't but Furi feels a bit better

@@adityaanuragi6916 but is furi an actual truck hitting

@@bbbbende no sadly

That is a visual effect

I agree the 4 ways to make an attack feel satisfying are: VFX SFX Camera shake Playing with ( like hit stops and stuff, mark mentioned this in depth in "forging the leviathan axe" video)

I think screen shake is part of why, when I'm faced with a combat system, I stop trying to parse the animations and understand what's going on onscreen, and just mash the buttons.

@@dranorter what about times when you don't need to read the animation Like when you attack a low damage one but it's great for crowd control and you know they're stunned so by the time you need to read the animation you won't be having the camera shake But don't you agree it makes it satisfying I played the old god of war games they had it and it was fun

@@adityaanuragi6916 I'm an odd case, I just don't connect that well with combat mechanics. Similarly, when fight scenes show up in comics and movies, I just kinda wait for them to end so I can see who won since that's all that matters. I think the last time I really enjoyed a combat mechanic was SMRPG, trying to get the "timed hit" right -- IE, adding a simple timing element to a turn-based system is fun for me, but having things be all timing all the time, well, my brain just turns off and I spam whatever button I've learned is okay to spam. I say I'm an odd case, but idk, I'm sure there are lots of people like me. I am trying to learn to enjoy such things though - there are some rare combat sequences I enjoy in comics.

Exactly

someone inform me

For me it was decent but not perfect at all

@@cherrydragon3120 Then your taste is trash

@@kestanecihasanpubg Sekiro is the definition of a perfect melee combat system

It's a really interesting part of making a game feel good. This talk given by Mariel Cartwright mentions something Mark didn't, which is animating a very slight "pull back" right after an attack has extended as far as it can go: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g91gm5yI0qjQo6s.html Also a bit surprised that Mark didn't mention Monster Hunter World's great sword having almost a full half-second of hitstop after landing a true charge.

Every weapon in MH World feels absolutely amazing. The bow in particular feels like the best bow in all of gaming.

Another good example of that is Ryu Hayabusa and William Adams' Iai strikes in which they quickly go from a neutral stance, rush forward while slashing their blade, and then going into a recovery animation at the end. Most competent action game developers know this technique like the back of their hand. Stuff like this, enemy damage reactions, and hitstop really makes your attacks feel like they carry weight and power.

I remember a brief video from one of the animators of the film Kubo and the Two Strings, which was an excellent illustration of how they included certain frames with frozen poses to help emphasise impacts. I don't think it was a KZfaq video, I think it was on Twitter or Instagram. I'll try and find it... EDIT: Found it! It was on kevinbparry's Instagram. (Who, I didn't realise before, is the same person who did a viral ball magic trick video earlier this year.) KZfaq will probably block this post if I post the URL directly, so you'll have to scroll back through his timeline to find his post of December 24, 2016. It's not an analysis video, just a clip from the movie, and I misremembered it because although it was about how to emphasise impacts, it wasn't really about holding frozen frames. But his comments on it are still very detailed and fascinating for anyone interested in animation techniques.

OMG I JUST REALIZED! This is why Dark Souls 2 combat feels so weak and buttery in a really unsatisfying way, unlike the other games in the series. A lot of the weapons admittedly do have the slow startup and recovery, but not much more than that. The "colored lines" following the attack patterns for the weapons are pretty weak (not to mention colorless) and a pretty unsatisfying sound effect. Also, Mark didn't mention this, but I think the lack of screen shake decreases the satisfaction of the combat.

His content is mainly for his Patreons - it doesn't harm him in any way to recommend other KZfaqrs content. Plus others do the same thing - just look at the Battlefield community on Twitch. Never seen anything like 'em, telling them to check out the other's steams.

Joseph Romines I don't think it would harm him even if he didn't have Patreon

You'll find smaller channels tend to do it more, ironically.

you're right, the web has always been a hyperlinking medium, and it should be no less in the new era of video content. good comment.

HEY It's Kratos' choreographer! Thanks for making it possible Sir!

@@jhudielgabrielsabelino9278 fcv

00009

When will your new game come out? Cant wait!!!! #MidnightFightExpress

AC2 has a lot of options for counter-attacking that don’t involve counters. Using parries (not counters) and timing attacks properly after them functions as a perfect parry system that lets you stagger enemies. Hitting a staggered enemy is basically like a deathblow in Sekiro. The stagger system is the cornerstone of that combat system and a stagger state can be triggered in a number of different ways, which makes using counters a rather ineffective method of defence by the late game, as you mentioned. Against brutes, you’ll need to parry if you want to induce stagger. Against regular armoured enemies, a dodge to the side followed by a quick strike does the trick, but you can also use parries. Dodging a seeker’s sweep attack causes Ezio to perform a unique animation that snaps their spear in half. Counters are reserved for common enemies and agiles. It is theoretically possible to win every fight by sitting there, waiting to counter people with the Hidden Blade, but why would you do that? It’s not the most effective way to fight, nor the most efficient way to fight, nor the most cool-looking way to fight and it’s certainly not the most enjoyable way to fight. Choosing to play that way only harms the experience for yourself and it’s not even optimal. So, don’t do it. AC2 also introduced backstabs, disarm counters, strafing, grabbing onto enemies and holding them/beating them down/killing them, using enemies as human shields, using enemies as projectiles to knock down other enemies, ground finishers with all weapons, long/heavy weapon special attacks, taunting enemies to induce attacks, and more. That the system is reduced to being “just stand there and wait for enemies to attack so you can counter them” will forever be tragic to me because players who chose to engage with the system that way missed out on so much stuff that really helps sell the fantasy of being an Assassin.

@@jcers I don't think there were any parries in AC2. It's been a while since I've played it, but aside from the normal counters, I don't remember any type of timed perfect parry in the game. There were different types of counters based on what you had equipped. Normal weapons had normal counters. If you were unarmed, you would do a disarm counter and attempt to steal your enemy's weapon. And if you equipped the assassin's blade, you would get a special counter that would insta-kill any enemy (including the boss enemies in the game), but you couldn't block while equipped with this weapon, and the timing was much more difficult than other counters, so this was a risky strategy. High risk, high reward. Different enemies had different methods that were best for fighting them. The most basic of enemies could be insta-killed with a single counter attack. Some other enemies were also weak to counter attacks. The big brute enemies were weak to the disarm move. You could steal their giant weapon and insta-kill them with it, and then that weapon could be used to insta-kill another brute, but it would break the weapon to do an insta-kill on a brute when you didn't just steal the weapon. So for the price of a single disarm counter, you could kill two brutes with cool, cinematic kill animations. I seem to recall that you could also do a counter with a brute weapon that would insta-kill any normal enemy, but would break the weapon. But most enemies as you progress through the game, counter attacks would do a little bit of damage, but a very low amount. Not every enemy could even be countered effectively with a normal weapon. In the video, he cherry picked a fight from early in the game and pretends like that fight with the single weakest enemy type defines the entire combat system. You could do that with any game and claim that the combat system was bad because they haven't even introduced 90% of the combat system at that point. If you show the first level of a game and act like that's the entire game, you're ignoring almost the entire game in your analysis. And yes, if you were bad at the game and didn't know the differences between enemies, you could use that counter strategy to get you through most of the game. But it was slow and inefficient, and didn't feel at all good or satisfying. You would counter a guy and bonk him on the head and do 1/10 of his HP, and keep going until you countered him 10 times in a row. And the guys didn't attack constantly, so you could be waiting 30 seconds or more between attacks, which is an eternity in video game time. Think about games that have special abilities with a long cooldown time of 30 seconds, with short cooldowns in the 5 second range and medium cooldown of 10-15 seconds! You could spend half an hour on a single fight with just a few guys if you did it that way. My point is, most games have something you could do to exploit the combat in a cheap, slow, unfun way to get through the game. I remember playing Borderlands and getting up on a rock and shooting at an enemy that was way higher level than me, but he didn't have any ranged attacks, and I emptied literally every bullet I owned and managed to kill the critter with my very last bullet. It took 20 minutes to kill one enemy. It wasn't fun - although the fact that he died on my last bullet made it more rewarding than it would reasonably be normally. But I didn't adopt that play style, because it was slow and boring. I did it once. It was effective, but it was slow and boring, so I never did it again. The devs don't have to remove every possible way that you can exploit their combat system. If there's a boring way that doesn't require any skill to get through the game, I think it's fine to leave that in. If a player gets enough enjoyment by using that to get through the game, great. The player played through the game in a way that was enjoyable to them. Mission accomplished. But if a player finds that method slow and boring, then he'll look for better ways to get through the game that feel more rewarding. Now I'll give you that the AC2 combat system was a little unadvanced by today's standards, and had a lot of room for improvement. But it was possibly the best and most realistic melee combat system ever devised at that point in time. And I much prefer the AC2 combat system to the combat systems of the more recent AC games like Origins and... god, I can't even remember the names of them anymore they run together so much... that other one that was basically an extension of Origins. Odyssey? That's it. Didn't try Valhalla, because I was burned out on AC after O&O.

Is it ready

Am I the only person who disagrees with the whole idea of the Resident Evil punch? It is exactly that kind of super over the top animation as the over the shoulder super quick rotating strike of Gerald from the Witcher 3 (no offense meant. It's still a great game). In my opinion animations shouldn't be too realistic but also not too "holy crap wtf is just happening right NOW!!!?" like.

@@dramalexi Your opinion is worthless then because these are all very basic tried and true concepts of animation. I'm not even sure what you are even getting at, it's very clear what is happening when Chris punches the enemy, it's the whole godamn point of it in the first place.

Well Chris Redfield can break boulders with his bare hands. What the heck was expected from you?

@@dramalexi Over the shoulder rotating strike? Wtf is that? Do you mean his overhand left or spinning back fist? All those strikes are legit striking techniques... how is it over top? 😂🤣

MogamiArt It is indeed well researched for his subjects of interesting combat systems but sadly, not for all of the actual games. It may be because I am a no life fan of the Dark Souls series but Mark Brown got some little things wrong about the series that kind of made me worry. Especially when there’s only DS1 and 3 clips in it. IDK for the others games but it may not just be about Dark Souls. Ho knows, I may be just rambling endlessly for no good reason but... what ever.

Well, this is one of his longest videos, so I guess he just had to cut it short in some way. As for DS2, that may just be my perception, but I thought that a lot of Soulsborn fans didn't like DS2 that much… …and since Mark uses his own footage, he may not have had any great DS2 footage to put into the video. But I understand your concern and it's great that you shared your opinion!

Yes I am pretty aware of the hate on Dark Souls 2. It is all right for him to not like it but it is in no way a bad game. Most people hate it simply because of the nostalgia, following the hate train or just looking at the surface and blame the game instead of adapting the new game play. But the game is still known in the Souls fandom to have the best pvp in the whole series and also brought something important in making a compelling combat system. That is diversity in fighting style. You see, in ds2, you could build a shield only build and have a variety of ways to fight with it. When in the others games, you had one attack and maybe two wen in ds2, you have 5 diverse move set of attacks with it. Then there’s the dual wielding mechanics that only exist in the second game. It makes that if you are using 2 weapons of the same size and have the right stats, you can use a dual move set that varies for each weapon. You basically can dual wield almost every single weapons in the game including shields. This is just scratching the surface of all of the great improvements from ds2 but got all tossed out from the 3 game because of DS1 fans service. This is why I believe that it is still important to look at the games that you don’t like because you may miss great things about them. So this is one of the reasons of my concern but then, Mark Brown makes 2 big mistakes. He says that in the Souls series, you have to dedicate your actions because they cannot get canceled. But again, ds2 has animation canceling which is again one of the reasons why it is considered as to have the best pvp. It is indeed minor but then he talks about hyper armor and call it poise as he showed us a clip of ds3. If you didn’t know, ds3 don’t have any poise in it. It does have hyper armor but it is not poise. If he was really a fan of the Souls series like he said in an another video, then this shouldn’t have been in the video. Especially when it was a big BIG discussion in the Souls fandom the moment the 3 game hit the shelves and is still on going to this day. If those errors were made in one of his most praise games... then think of the others games that he doesn’t enjoy as much. Now that I think of it, he made also a lot of errors in the boss key video of skyward sword wen he was talking about the game outside of the dungeons. But I may be wrong on that so I am going to go watch the video right now. I hope that explains correctly my concerns. But in the end, we are all humans and we are bound to make mistakes.

I assume Mark didn't talk about DS2 because he wanted to talk about simplicity in combat, DS1 had a relatively simple combat system and I can imagine that he put the focus on beauty in simplicity. I wouldn't call it DS1 fanservice because most people only know DS1 so it was probably just choosing an example that most people could comprehend. This is a video for game developers and game enthusiasts, that's why it's as broad and conceptual as possible. I agree with you on that part, however, I would simply call it bad wording than calling it out as a mistake. I didn't know that DS3 doesn't have poise in it as I have never played it, but I can imagine that making a wrong statement about a game that you are passionate about is upsetting. Everyone makes small errors, only because I got that one fact wrong doesn't mean he's not a fan of the series… When you have to play as many games as Mark does for his job it's easy to confuse details. The only thing that bothered me personally about the SWS Bosskeys episode was that he didn't even try to hide his dislike of the game. I see now where you are coming from, especially getting the poise part wrong is imaginably upsetting. However, Dark Souls was just one of the many games he presented in the video and I still believe it was overall well researched. The problem could have been that his source wasn't all that authentic.

@@raphicoco what a garbage comment

Let's list some anyway, shall we. I'll start with God of War

Broforce. Really underappreciated game

Then the combat should reward interesting choices. Devil may cry is often easy to just beat especially on lower difficulties. But to get that coveted SSS rank or equivalent you need to really think about your choices, even when you're mowing through enemies.

@@aniketraghav1328 he showed an example of God of War having enimies attcking you at once so you wouldnt have a chance to do that. So idk what youre talking about.

@@tylerwagner1978 There's more than one god of war game.

HLD was at its best when the Drifter is up against a whole crowd of enemies. Each individual enemy is incredibly simple to defeat given the Drifter's ability to dodge, but the way you need to be constantly aware of the whole battlefield to prevent yourself from being zoned is where it shines.

Hard agree with this. I always thought that the balance for ammo and melee combat was a genius idea. HLD remains my favorite game of all time in all honesty just to how much I enjoyed it in every way possible.

I remember enjoying it a lot, but I also remember having a somewhat difficult time understanding all the new moves I kept getting. I played it for 3-4 hours and haven't touched it since but I wanna finish it; would it be better to start over or just load up my save and try to re-learn it?

The big difference in that game is that the camera is top-down, so you're not always fighting with the camera. Although I wish it didn't move in front of your character and just stayed centered.

It had good combat but range weapons felt too overpowered even when they where balanced. I could kill so many enemies before I finish rest with melee. This game is super easy if you upgrade your weapons and health. The dash system did not respond well with my keyboard... Maybe its my keyboard or its from the game.

It's a good'un!

Mark Brown lol

It was free for PS Plus subscribers back in 2016.

Pirate it because Activision have removed the game from online store because they don't care.

Jonok fuck activision

I understood tht reference

soumya ranjan kanr ohh hahaah.. Wait, beat my meat......

MrSecksee well it's a good thing to make the player feel like an unstoppable force...but I think Devil may cry 3, Bayonetta 1 and 2, Transformers devastation and a lot more, have better combat system and still make you feel like an unstoppable force.

@@misscrimson3555 way to completely miss the point of his comment. The game throws harder learneing curves in different ways. Some enemies cannot be countered or use special weapons that need certain techniques to counter. The predator sections have varied mechanics with enemies that have radar or special guns, etc. Point is, Batman's combat system is prefect for the game and any criticism of it is kinda tone deaf

@@MrAndrewaziz that's the thing, right. we need to critise in context.

This is a cop out. All action games have the same goal without resorting to the absolute bottom of the barrel combat system that is Bamham. What you meant to say is that the game is meant to be marketed to the lowest common denominator.

I mean, shouldn't you also feel like a tactician while in a brawl as Batman?!?

It's just me, or God Hand really seen more popular here in Brasil? Me and a lot of friends grown up playing it, but it just don't seen as popular out there.

One of my favs as a kid

I hated it because the button mashing was fkin unreal. unless you like buying 5controllers for 1 game. The QTE's fked the game pretty hard tbh

God hand in Indonesia is also very popular

@@vikisetyaherdian8368 Oh cool, God Hand is a really fun game, i wish it was more popular. I actually follow a few indonesian streamers from Hololive, nice to know that God Hand is popular there.

And how Sakurai made a series that can be enjoyed by casuals without the need for crazy strats but can also be enjoyed by veterans and pros for the complete opposite reason I’d say he was successful in accomplishing that not enough games do that imo

@@jonathanwilson7949 Idk, i feel like that was true at least til Brawl but since then, especially with ultimate, smash isn’t really appealing to newer players. Sure, it may just have to do with the stigma of it being a “sweaty” competitive game now, but with the insane roster it has now it can be intimidating especially to those who don’t have much experience in games, much less fighting games which are notorious for having a really steep skill curve. I do remember being able to play smash 64 and melee without feeling super overwhelmed, mainly because the roster was short and mostly made up of extremely familiar characters. And at that time, even tho there certainly was a competitive scene, it wasn’t nearly as popular as it is now. Not to say that this is any fault of Sakurai, just noticing how over time smash has become less accessible to new players which used to be central to its ideals

And it takes skill to pull off amazing combos

@@SuperBeybladerocks lmao

Also trying to implement all special takedowns and quickfire gadgets into a single combo is satisfying as hell. Especially when ot goes to 100+

I love it too, although I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite. It works great for Batman, and the variety of enemy types does make it much more than button mashing and waiting for counters

@@scepta101 Even when it's just basic goons, the combat system is far more than just button mashing. The Arkham games are possibly the least button mashy games I've ever played. The penalty for button mashing is severe in those games. This is the game that taught me to stop button mashing. Every game I played before this let me get away with button mashing without much consequence. But Arkham taught me to only press the button when I want to actually do something, not just in anticipation of spamming attack as quickly as possible. In Arkham, every attack must be thought out and planned and pulled off with a single button press. Press the button too quickly and your attacks are far less powerful. Repeatedly press the button too quickly and your attacks will miss altogether and you will eventually get hit with an attack that you can't deflect, either of which has the drastic effect of weakening your next 2 attacks to the point where they have a very short range and do literally no damage. The game is genius, though, because you can get through the game by button mashing. But you're not Batman. You're just another goon punching his way through the game. But learn to play without button mashing, and the game transforms into something else entirely. It becomes a tightly choreographed action movie with some of the most amazing fight scenes ever.

Funny you mention Monster Hunter's lack of targeting helping it since I feel it's a better representative of your first topic: the enemy reactions. I played a Monster Hunter game on my PSP back in the day and I just couldn't get into it at all because there WEREN'T any enemy reactions. It felt like my giant wind-up and recovery animations did *nothing* to these creatures. I recoil when I'm bit by a bug or scratched by a kitten and I just cut through 3-4 inches of flesh on this beast and it didn't do anything at all to react to it. It was entirely unsatisfying and it was the primary reason I put the game down. Dauntless, a Monster Hunter-like which just went into open beta, fixed this by having the body part react to the attack, at least a little bit, and giving it visual scarring based on the kind of attack used on that body part. I actually feel like I'm carving into this beast instead of my weapon passing through it like dropping a knife into a tub of butter/spread.

@@VoilaTadaOfficial Modern Monster Hunter games have way more satisfying feedback and enemy reactions than the first games. MH4U and World Iceborne have the best combat systems of the franchise, you should give it another opportunity.

+1, For me, if they have reduced the use of the flurry rush would have been better. In the later third of the game, I remebered the only enjoyment I get from using it happened once to avoid an enemy and use the bow to kill another enemy while falling off from a wood tower.

yeah,the evades are a bit weird.like,its technicly impossible to actually time it for some lynel-attacks,but when you actually do it,you basicly do it when the attack should have already hit you.and there are those weird attacks where you get hit even if you use the dodge

I think they were trying to find a middle ground between difficult and easy. Using the enemy's attack animations alone would have made for very easy perfect dodge, especially since the game doesn't have very many enemy types to learn. On the other hand, they could have made enemies telegraph less, but that would have made dodging too difficult. It would have hurt the aesthetics, too, since there is inherent charm and game-feel value to expressive enemies with exaggerated animation. So they took the middle ground of giving enemies relatively predictable telegraphs, yet limiting perfect dodges to a specific threat zone so you couldn't flurry rush spam. Unfortunately, it wasn't a very good solution. Or at the very least, not implemented carefully enough. As it stands, the game would have been better off without the perfect dodge. The perfect dodge really does nothing but lessen the incentive to try risking a parry, despite parries being far better implemented and balanced. Like most aspects of BotW, the combat is imperfect, yet has great potential.

But even when you miss a dodge, you still tend to not get hit and have an opening while the enemy is in it’s follow through and anticipation animations

@@Graphomite There's a few enemies that do have small telegraph windows in Botw. One is Lizalfos with great-swords. Their anticipation window is deceptively small with great-swords compared to the other weapon types. The other ones are Bokos and moblins with spears. They have one attack in particular which is just ridiculous. One frame they're running towards you, the very next frame their spears are in your gut. There's zero anticipation window for them.

it's not insult swordfighting, it's just s.word fighting!

“I’ve heard you were a contemptuous sneak” “Too bad no one’s ever heard of you at all”

"Yeah? Well, you fight like a cow!"

Haha clicky clicky sounds like they did it deliberately to wind up other games companies

pre 1.9 java minecraft has, hands down, my favourite melee pvp combat system ever. I think what sells it to me the most is that it wasnt made by the devs (as seen by the fact that they chose to ruin it in 1.9), it was made by the players - over years of discovering the limits of minute mechanics and how best to manipulate an array of unintended features. It's only downfall (to my mind) is how influential latency can be.

Minecrafts pvp is pretty good actually, or at least it was before 1.9

@@hxrl5838 yep its probably sounds wierd to someone who never played pvp minecraft but its really good, especially how you could use stuff that wasnt intedet to fight in pvp like rods fns and lava

​@@hxrl5838 before I reply a disclaimer: no offence in any of these sentences, if ur offended I'm sorry I am confused about people that love pre 1.9 combat. now don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with liking it. I'm just confused about how in many games spammy playstyles are looked down upon, while in the minecraft community the pre 1.9 combat system that literally involves spamming your sword is the preferred option. now I do have to agree that it was cool that we could use things like rods for combat, but I do not understand why people complained about the removal of mashing m1 as a viable strategy. TL;DR: me not getting why people prefer spammy combat system go brrr

Reminds me of Prototype. They created this character with all of these awesome, crazy moves. "Pretty cool. So who do I use them on?" "I dunno. Dudes? Like, army dudes."

This is where Mirrors Edge catalyst failed. The enemy AI is retarded. They don’t chase you, they don’t learn from spam moves, and they have like one attack each; except the sentinels. But they aren’t in free roam so what’s the point.

Honestly, I have to disagree. Gameplay can age the best, but so can visuals, or sound design. I played Super Mario 64 on the Switch recently and I think the gameplay was pretty atrocious, it felt clunky and awkward. It's not aged well. But somebody who grew up with that as their standard is going to think that all things considered, it plays pretty well. Yet I'm sure both of us can agree that the game's visuals have aged like a jug of milk. Meanwhile, if you look at a game like Terraria or Hollow Knight, those games are probably always going to look acceptable regardless of how you feel about their gameplay because of how stylized their visuals are.

Pretty sure that was dual blades.

Ninja. Gaiden.

This creativity of mechanics is also why botw doesn’t need a proper skill tree, because different play styles are viable just based on mechanics

Game Score Fanfare I don't think they're that hard to understand. Your combo score builds by landing attacks in a row without getting hit. Each attack is assigned some value based on its difficulty to perform. The algorithm decreases the value of the attack each time you perform it in the same combo.

Well I imagine it varies for each game. But sometimes they just have these random parameters like "Finesse" or something but never teaches you how to score higher in it! That's my general impression, but I haven't played a whole lot of action combat games.

Some games, like devil may cry, give you more orbs the higher the score you get which in turn you can use to buy new items and combos. i think thats a pretty good example of a scoring system which encourages you to do well, but i agree with you than in most games its pretty useless.

I have never once cared about a combat score

in DMC it is huge difference in orbs (your upgrade resource and money) between C and S ranks etc. So it DOES matter. Other games might just implement it as a bonus feature, or something to be comparable

The Lingering Will sometimes activates revenge value before you finish a combo

@@notproductiveproductions3504 When you take around 5-6 bars of HP he will automatically use that whip attack regardless of the situation and revenge value

I actually personally think the Revenge Value system in KH is inelegant in many cases because it doesn't effectively communicate what's going on to a player, and there's very little (if any) tell for when they're about to break out. The game Tales of Xillia has a similar system where bosses' breakout attacks are heavily telegraphed, but also undermines itself by having bosses do them far too often in a game with a combat system fundamentally about long combos, having the attack be slightly _too_ telegraphed, and not giving the player access to any similar mechanism themselves, meaning that bosses can and will infinitely combo _the player_ to death while the player can't do the same to them.

spiderman ps4 does that too

All made by one guy. It's an amazing game

Thats why you go with assassin archer build 😂💔

@@shiroshiba9791 Non direct combat gameplay is the best. Trying to kill enemies with physics chain reactions makes skyrim entertaining.

What TES6 needs is some martial skill and lethality. Like thrusts are fast but cuts knock away thrusts, 2h weapons break 1h weapon blocks but not vice versa, etc. sword-chess.

@@shiroshiba9791 Honestly that's even worse. At least with the normal combat there's some sort of risk of dying and there's *some* nuance with power attacks and blocking. Stealth archer? Just kill everything, one after another, with literally no risk of dying because enemies couldn't find a fucking billboard if they tried.

it’s literally just r2 until the enemy dies

That's just the worst, you pull off an awesome move but the ragdoll or sound effect sound off. Yish

SonOfDickins i hope RV comes back in 3

I just want to point out 2 thing: In critical you have esentially 1/4 of the HP than in beginner (Sora gains half the HP, and he takes twice as much damage), and RVs don't count succesful comboes, it adds a value on each hit (The value being dependan on what the hit is) and once it reaches a certain treshold (Lingering Will's is 25, for example), the boss does an attack and resets the counter, and yes it's a really good system which seems like it might be back on 3 if the super boss from 0.2 is anything to go by? (Or at least they are letting bosses get stunned and giving them predictable and dodgable counters which, fun fact, Vanitas did at the end of Ventus' story and it feels so good you wonder why they didn't do it with the rest of the bosses)

SonOfDickins I'm currently playing through KH2FM on critical mode and revenge value is never acknowledged by the game. I guess that's why it feels like some enemies randomly avoid hit stun. The player wouldn't be able to spam x if enemies blocked or dodged instead of magically brute forcing their way through. Sora's attacks are floaty and hard to cancel. The parry takes about half a second to startup and recover making it extremely clunky. In order to avoid getting caught in boss fights the combat devolves into hit 4-5 times then run, spam cure if you made mistake. Revenge value is a cop-out for designing a combat system and bosses that eliminate spamming in a natural way.

dandre3K Revenge value wasn't discovered until literally years after the game released. It's a hidden mechanic that had to be discovered by fans. And it's a great system. I would link you to a video or two that explains it better than I ever could, but it seems like you've already made up your mind, so I won't. Also, if you know that the guard takes half a second to startup, then work around that. And if you want to know what floaty combat feels like, play any Kingdom Hearts after 2FM, because 2FM isn't floaty.

SonOfDickins yeah the only good thing about that game is its combat system on a difficulty only available in Japan for 10 years. It’s why speed runners like it because they skip the bad parts. The first game was clunky but it was infinitely more charming, had a better atmosphere, more varied and interesting level design, better writing and narrative and overall just a better package.

King Luigi a good combat system is also a unique one

It's just a joke :)

Can confirm, I did this and my came made 17 million pounds and won game of the year for 32.8 years in a row and cured my skin and cleared my depression

I imagine that do so does make your "came" really valuable. As it is all the girls think about--shadow the hedhog's came that is.

King Luigi instruccions unclear, now the protagonist of my game is asking where is the damn forth chaos emerald

He mentioned that quite a lot, no?

I think KH BBS and KH DDD would like a word with you hahaha

Too many attacks with a lot of wind up and cool down, and since most of the monsters that you have to fight have a lot of super armor, it gets pretty irritating too try and land an attack.

the "collision query" could be better in monster hunter. the weapon is often in the monster

Doc Louis try gittin gud?

I dunno, I didn't feel like the the hits had much impact at all. Maybe it was just a problem with 3 Ultimate which was the only one I played, but I doubt it. Beasties that big need to be able to shrug off any single attack like it's a light breeze, and it wouldn't work otherwise, but it leaves any hit feeling pretty weak.

Play Greatsword. The monsters don't flinch on every attack, but when you break a part, they'll reel back and you'll get a visual effect of the part breaking, or you may even knock them out if you play hammer. I've yet to find a more satisfying feeling in a video game compared to landing a full charge greatsword swing on the head of a charging monster only to see and hear their face breaking and them reeling backwards only opening themselves up to more damage. Them having constant super armor makes it all the more satisfying because when they finally do flinch, you know you just hit them really hard.

Didn't KH1 have something similar to it too? I remember in the Sephiroth fight specifically, where it was much better to NOT execute a full attack combo on him because he'd just teleport out of the last hit. (Though I definitely remember more using partial attack combos against Xigbar in KH2...)

@@Stratelier from what i remember only 2 bosses actually have a small enough RV to ever make a difference, which is riku in hallowbastion and sephi. and even then rikus is high enough were unless you going for those big combos doesnt actually consider for most people since the basic 3 hit combo is generaly what most people got. sephi on the other hand from what i recall just breaks out of anything after 5? hits in atlest 1 phase. unlike almost ever other entrys in the KH series, KH1 has limits with how combos work to get the longest combos that only certain setups can break.

@@Stratelier For me, he'd always just do that attack where he says "Time to die" and raises volcanoes out of the ground.

I find it too easy. The constamt juggling of enemies make the game less satisfying and more mainstream easy. My oppinion tho. You can have a lot more fun with it then i did i guess

@@cherrydragon3120 I think you didnt play on DMD, since enemies activate devil trigger and CAN NOT be staggered (or at least it takes like 30 attacks to acctually juggle them). Give it a try

Yeah... no not really

@@cherrydragon3120 dmc it's bout having fun with the combos not about surviving, I find it challenging to get an S rank in every mission

DMC is not about just beating the level, at all. A 5 year old could mash through a DMC level on the first few difficulties. DMC is about keeping your SSS for as long as possible and feeling like a badass.

how to comment on youtube goddamn new layout, without "answer" tab!?

mjc0961 shut up

I think in the part he tlaked about brutes forcing you to change strategy woudvle been a great place to talk about the different enemy types in Bat:Ark Series tho. They have many great enemies that force you to do so in Ark City. The league of shadow girls teleporting forcing you to use the gadgets, the armored guys that need to be stunned first, the lightning rod guys that need to be hit on the back...Really a Video on enemy types may just be a good follow up video/part 2.

Especially when you already either mentioned or shown 43 games in this short span of time!

But we love [ Insert games here ] and it got a [ good/bad/interesting ] combat/melee system! Let's share the love.

Wish I could like this comment more. All of Mark's points broadly cover the majority of how combat systems in games work, even if everyone's favorite niche game isn't represented. Yet, some act like it's a personal affront and slight to their very existence and livelihood as humans on this Earth that Mark didn't include it.

What do you mean by damage sponges.

Button smashers can be fun too.