I remember the old times when it was a supernova…ahhhh the memories

Extremely hard to believe that Earth is the only planet with life! We are special and extremely lucky to have "lived" regardless of anything else!

I prefer supernovas to supernovae personally. Just saying

This is really amazing!! I was actually hoping for an episode on this from SOU and here we are! 🌌💫✨❤️💯

We are a glass of fizzy champagne. 🥂 😊

It is likely that the age of the universe will have to be re-assessed, otherwise we will be finding galaxes older than the universe.

My brain hurts. I still don't get how we/they know all this info. HOW do we know we're not just a bunch of Who's living on a dust-speck in Who'ville? :)

M dead.... What a video ❕❕😍😍just phenomenal 🤍 thoroughly enjoyed...Gatitude SOU for keeping us updated ... ❤❤ 🙌🙌

thank you for sharing this!!🌏🌃🌟

I really like to know about universe

Looking back to creation! Very cool…

I prefer Champaign Supernovas!

Supernovae...good English SOU!!!! Years of dead languages, makes me feel all warm and bubbly

This is going to take some time, isn't it?

The most interesting thing to me is that Webb found 80 supernovae in just one small area of ​​sky. These discoveries will help scientists understand the expansion rate of the universe and the mysterious dark energy.

Did you get that Max,? yes Chief everything except after "the James Webb Telescope"....

I’d be very curious to know more about Planet 9 😮🤔

So each time this star goes novae, we see the results. However, because the star is moving outward, each subsequent event happens closer to us than the prior event. Additionally, our technology is improving so we can see further back in time. So if each event that we see is older, than we are watching the universe backwards. Am I making any sense, or am I completely lost?

How universe so full majestic creation beautiful supernova but terrible ❤❤❤

If the universe supposedly began from one point about 13billion yrs ago, how are there objects 93 billion light years apart? Considering it would take 93 billion yrs for even light to cover that distance how has matter travelled that far?

Z of 13.3? man oh man.

I like Super Man what time is your it on

The Fonz likes supernovaayyyyyyyyyy

Where were you when we were getting high?

Wow

1:53 that is not entirely true supernova are the dramatic final stages of massive stars. Supernovae is a term for all types of supernova’s some of which can be created by small stars like our son that that become gravitationally locked with the corpse of a dead star known as a neutron star or a white dwarf and when even small stars merge with neutron stars, they create supernova‘s, they don’t even have to merge a white dwarf, can go supernova by creating mass from a binary partner that is a type of supernovae that is not created by a massive star

Very cool stuff. Thank you for the interesting listening 👂!! Will dive into more, now that I found you. Been listening to StarTalk with Neil Tyson deGrasse and have ran out of videos to watch. Good timing, good find, GOOD STUFF!! How long can this light be detectable? Is it forever or will it fade away? And whats the universe's ultimate fate? The big rip?

So, what's the fate of the universe?

Planet 10!

1:28 there’s no such thing as dark energy

Just think, each and every one of us is a product of supernova.

Is it possible that Big Bang could have just have been a very large supernovae event, one of potential endless others, that sparked our universe. Maybe we’re just seeing our “Small” corner of an endless expanse?

Coolio!

Uni-verse "Single" - "SpokenWord"

Whats the difference between Supernova and Supernovae?

All Good, BUT,, You talked about it, but never mentioned exactly what "The Rate of Expansion of the Universe is.!" - Ha.. I guess i's still a "Secret of the Universe".... hmm

Supernovae

I love my daughter a star in my life 😊

CMBR: (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation): Consider the following: Per QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules) and QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms), matter has to exist for 'em' to be given off by that matter. What matter exists in outer space for that microwave 'em' to be seen by us? And 'if' it were from when matter first came into existence during the fairy tale of the 'singular big bang', that 'em' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us. BB -> Matter and 'em' are created -> 'em' moves at the speed of light, matter moves more slowly -> (Billions of years go by) -> matter (and us) here ..........................................'em' long gone. (And there is no matter 'out here' yet for any 'em' to come back to us via QED or QCD). AND: RED SHIFT: WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS): Consider the following: a. Current narrative: Space itself is expanding. (Even though science does not fully know yet what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand). b. But consider: The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, (even modern science claims 'em' has momentum), continuously, over a prolonged period of time, with other galaxies doing the same, with nothing to stop them from doing so, would tend to push galaxies away from each other and even potentially allow the cosmic web to form between galaxies. And then, when we here in our galaxy, look at far away galaxies, with other galaxies in between, the net effect of all those galactic interactions would have galaxies furthest from ours move away faster the further those galaxies were from us, including us perceiving a red shift of energy. c. Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, which way is more probably correct? What the current narrative is ('a' above), or 'b' utilizing known physics? * Added note: Plus, 'if' my analysis is correct that our spiral shaped galaxy is collapsing in upon itself, then consider also: d. When we look at solar systems between ours and the center of the galaxy, those solar systems would be getting pulled faster towards the center than ours, hence also seeing a red shift of energy. e. When we look at solar systems between ours and the outer edge of the galaxy, our solar system would be getting pulled faster towards the center then them, hence also seeing a red shift of energy. f. Only if we looked at solar systems adjacent to ours should we see a blue shift of energy (as the solar systems became closer together as they moved towards the center of the galaxy). I also propose looking for blue shifts of energy between our solar system and adjacent solar systems to confirm or deny this current belief. g. But if true, would also add to our observation of seeing a red shift of energy in this universe as our spiral shaped galaxy collapses in upon itself. Of which, not only would species from this Earth have to get off of this Earth before the Sun becomes a red giant one day and wipes out all life on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself, but species from this Earth would also have to successfully get out of this collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, otherwise, most probably death awaits us all and this Earth and all on it are all just a waste of space time in this universe. All life from this Earth would eventually die and go extinct. Currently, no exceptions. h. QUESTION: Do basically all galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves? (Which would add to the perceived red shift between galaxies as they all basically shrink in size). Modern science currently states that 'gravity' is matter bending the fabric of spacetime. There is a lot of matter in a galaxy and hence would make a huge dent in spacetime. How could galaxies not collapse in upon themselves if space and time were bent to make it so? Of which also, the progression of galaxies?: 1. How exactly do galaxies form? (The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.) 2. How exactly do galaxies flatten out if gravity is acting on the whole galaxy? (Other forces must also be at work besides gravity for a galaxy to flatten out? Electrical and/or magnetic forces?) 3. How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped? (At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input. Additionally, with the conservation of energy, as energy moves into the vertical plane from the center of the horizontal plane, energy from the horisontal plane moves to the center of the horizontal plane to replace the energy that moved into the vertical plane. There is also the conservation of angular momentum. As more matter moves towards the center of the galaxy, that portion of the galaxy would speed up relative to the matter towards the outer portions of the galaxy.) Additionally: GALAXY SPIN: (Inner and Outer areas spinning at the same speed): The inner and outer areas of the galaxy are connected via gravitational, electrical, and magnetic energy fields. While moving at the same speed, the inner area has less space to travel whereas the outer area has more space to travel. Hence a spiral shape forms. 4. The natural progression of a galaxy would be to become smaller and smaller. 5. Of which, does all life throughout the entire universe (if other life even exists in the universe besides what is on this Earth, which is most probably true) eventually die and go extinct and the entire universe and all in it are ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things and the entire universe and all in it are ultimately just a waste of spacetime in existence? And even 'if' the current narrative of space itself is expanding, and the entire universe would eventually end in a 'big freeze', wouldn't the end of life itself in this entire universe still occur?

"Standard Candles" are only good if you know how much dust exists in the line of sight.

Assume

My Latin teacher taught me that the "-ae" suffix was to be pronounced ahh-eeee, in other words, what we in English would call a long i. Just like the ei in German, or the i in like. It drives me a bit batty to hear the long a sound here. But I guess I'm a Ciceronean snowflake, no match for supernovae.

❤🎉😮

Still no life found…..

omg stop saying super no vay its driving me mad

The All. (El in hebrew).

First 🙂

🤍🌟🌟🌟🤍

So James Webb Space Telescope creates images using CGI

Not true. Universe is much longer age for sure. If we see object 13B ligth yaers away, how long time need to make this distance from one point. it is match longer. And this is the distanse 13B years ago not now.

And what should break my brain here?

It’s Novah not Novay. Speak English do you?

kinda messes up evolution theories. the light is older than the universe? God bless,matthew6:33,proverbs3:5

Fjb

It's hilarious that you are taking an unproven theory of the universe and presenting it as if it is fact.

Scientists going see God eventually and believe!

❤🎉😮