What REALLY Happened to the Hogwarts Founders? (Their Sacrifice)

What REALLY Happened to the Hogwarts Founders? (Their Sacrifice) - Harry Potter Theory

Рет қаралды 59,851

Ай бұрын

Welcome to Harry Potter Theory. Today we’re going to be discussing HOGWARTS and its 4 founders. Godric Gryffindor, Salazar Slytherin, Rowena Ravenclaw and Helga Hufflepuff.
Specifically, we’ll be taking a closer look at the legacy they left behind- seeing if their contributions to the Wizarding World are perhaps even greater than previously imagined. We’re also going to be taking a closer look at what actually HAPPENED to them.
We know that they planned for the future (and their absence) by creating The Sorting Hat. This allowed them to continue to sort students in to their respective houses long after they were gone from the school.
But my theory today asserts that they left something…ELSE behind.
▼ PODCAST (SPOTIFY)
open.spotify.com/show/6EELBIY...
▼ PODCAST (APPLE)
podcasts.apple.com/in/podcast...
▼HARRY POTTER THEORY EXTRA CHANNEL (MORE CONTENT!)
/ @harrypottertheoryextra
▼ CINEMAFLUX (Lore+Quizzes) - www.cinemaflux.com/
▼MYTHOLOGY CHANNEL
/ @mythologyexplained
▼ Instagram - / hptheory
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @harrypottertheory
Please LIKE / SUBSCRIBE / SHARE to support the channel
Leave your video ideas down below!
Thanks!
All content falls under fair use: any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner.

Пікірлер: 131

@HarryPotterTheory Ай бұрын

More Harry Potter Documentaries! kzfaq.info/sun/PLB5djWCQq2_e0UCOmVbhRP8HkxetpzXUV

@scottmyers10 Ай бұрын

This theory is full of holes. To enact this charm, you have to be willing to be murdered by someone to protect someone else, and then the person you sacrificed yourself for is protected from the person you sacrificed yourself to. Harry is not protected from any threat he might face, in fact, anyone BUT Voldemort can kill him easily. His mother protected him from Voldemort, and only Voldemort. After Harry sacrifices himself to Voldemort for the rest of the school, they're protected from Voldemort and only Voldemort. His Death Eaters have no problems in killing and hurting people. There is nothing in any of the material that would allow someone to commit suicide and somehow protect everyone in the school from a vague and unknown potential attack at some point in the next 1000 years. There may be another kind of magic that does this, but this magic does not.

@cammo253 Ай бұрын

Mate I have to commend you for always covering such a huge range of topics and pumping out videos every couple of days is a serious achievement!

@HarryPotterTheory Ай бұрын

Thank-you!

@tjtaylor6431 Ай бұрын

Between the triwizard tournaments of past & quidditch as an institutional sport - we know from throwaway lines that more than one person has died at Hogwarts in 1,000 years even if we don’t directly know their names. It is worth noting as well that Cedric didn’t die at Hogwarts. (He also wasn’t murdered by Voldemort, even thought Dumbledore tells the school he was. He was killed by Peter Pettigrew. I’m always surprised at how often even people who are deep into Potter lore forget that one).

@jordyhelwig7657 Ай бұрын

My opinion Is That in this era Safest era since the creation of the school And the fact that the tournaments are known to be deadly And putting your name into the goblet of fire can lead to death I assume every time they did this tournament Some student got hurt Or died Now how many times did they do this event Then make a plus minus Im sure that for every 1 tournament nobody died There is one where someone died

@reiniernn9071 Ай бұрын

Who is the murderer? The one who gives the command to kill or the executioner of that command. Voldemort commanded: "Kill the spare". In the (normal) law the first one is the real cullpritt. The second one can do the action because he fears for his own life...

@scottleitner4801 Ай бұрын

I think your theory on the founders (other than Slytherin) sacrificing themselves is spot on, even about Myrtle.

@eugenebelford9087 Ай бұрын

Well thought through theory. There are, however, two aspects I'd challenge: 1.) There is the account of Helena Ravenclaw about her mother's death - which also includes the Baron. Why wouldn't they know about her sacrifice? So, at least heartbroken Ravenheart would maybe also be needed to be counted out just like Slytherin. 2.) No matter how you answer 1.), there is the fact that the Founders would have been people of their time. And - if anything at all - the number "1000" at that time would have symbolically (and esp. no longer literally) have meant "eternity"/ "until the end of times". My point is: the symbolism and understanding of numbers was very different back then. To think in such concept of: "in 100 years", "in thousand years", etc.) is very modern (-> clockworks; Newton).

@emmason8237 Ай бұрын

Ohh man this is such a great theory! Although it's known from the Canon that Rowena Ravenclaw fell ill and died - she also held off her death for as long as possible in the hope of reuniting with her daughter so I don't think she made the sacrifice. However, extending on your theory: After Ravenclaw's death, Hufflepuff and Gryffindor became worried how they would keep up their protections around the school, now that they were reduced by half and they were getting on in age/declining health and they then decided to cast the loving sacrifice over the castle. Maybe not the building itself but certainly anyone who could ever count themselves among its population, in perpetuity

@smthn_shep Ай бұрын

Forgot bout that good point

@craxd1 Ай бұрын

"I stole the diadem. I sought to make myself cleverer, more important than my mother. I ran away with it. My mother, they say, never admitted that the diadem was gone, but pretended that she had it still. She concealed her loss, my dreadful betrayal, even from the other founders of Hogwarts. Then my mother fell ill - fatally ill. In spite of my perfidy, she was desperate to see me one more time. She sent a man who had long loved me, though I spurned his advances, to find me. She knew that he would not rest until he had done so."- Helena Ravenclaw Rowena fell ill, fatally, but tried to survive long enough for the Baron to find Helena. No, she didn't sacrifice herself. As far as Salazar Slytherin, it has always been my thought that he built the chamber, and hid a basilisk, to be used against attacking muggles by his descendants if need be. He foresaw what could come, as the Inquisition was formed in 1184. The basilisk was never used by the Gaunts, even as crazy as they became, until Tom came to Hogwarts. He wasn't a true Gaunt, and as nuts as the Gaunts became, I doubt that they would have ever released a basilisk upon the school as Tom did. They had all the opportunities in the world to do so over one thousand years.

@kendraroth1276 Ай бұрын

Well it’s possible that not all of Slytherin’s descendants knew about the chamber. But the ones who did, definitely rarely, used it. Otherwise it would have been mentioned as being opened every 40 or so years. So they probably considered that the basilisk should only be used in case of an emergency. Though I do doubt that none of the descendants before Voldemort used it. Someone must’ve updated the entrance to the chamber. (Hogwarts was made before plumbing and it was reckless allow a Girls restroom to be where the chamber’s entrance is.)

@craxd1 Ай бұрын

@@kendraroth1276 I believe it was Corvinus Gaunt that had the second floor bathroom built. He probably paid for a wing to house it and what was below it (three floors in all). That may have been where much of their family's wealth was squandered. The entrance was supposedly an old trapdoor and tunnels, which they built over. It happened in the 1700s, when it was discussed that plumbing would be installed. The first patent for the flushing toilet was issued to Alexander Cummings in 1775, so it would have started around that time, even though one had been invented during the 1500s for the Queen. Yes, early castle toilets were built projecting off the walls, and worked like outhouses. The waste dropped to the ground or moat below. Chamber pots were also around long before plumbing and the first Crapper flush toilet.

@bostonrailfan2427 Ай бұрын

@@craxd1he did indeed have it built so it was known to his family through the generations…

@laurendobinson5930 Ай бұрын

Your. Videos are always amazing. Thank you for your hard work. It doesn’t go unnoticed

@MrSashaSmith Ай бұрын

SUCH a good video! Thank you for this insight! ❤

@catrie9965 Ай бұрын

James and Lily died in their home. If the spell can be transferred to a building, how was dumbledore sure that the spell wasn't on Godric's Hollow after their deaths? Why couldn't Harry live there instead of with Petunia?

@Dragondan1987 Ай бұрын

Maybe buildings require more preparation and planning, so dumbledore couldn’t just pull the blood protection out of the blood line and insert it into the building. Like the founders built the school, there is a good chance a protection spell like that might have needed them to put runes or charms or their blood on the very foundations of the building to hold the spell. Them willingly sacrificing themselves might allow for more power as well, since they could focus their power and give it willingly, while Harry’s parents accidentally doing it because they were murdered.

@elneeth Ай бұрын

Maybe the founders placed the sacrifice protection on the sorting hat who in turn places protection on everyone who wears the hat

@roseblite6449 Ай бұрын

@@elneeth Now THAT is an interesting theory.

@usefulprogrammer9880 Ай бұрын

I always perceived that the “love protection” spell that happens through sacrifice was a very niche and understudied area of magic. Quite like horcruxes. It was very much a spectrum in how it behaved. I believe this is evidenced by Dumbledore needing the Dursley’s, I’m sure if dumbledore could have had literally anyone else care for Harry he would have. But Dumbledore only KNEW for certain he’d be protected around a relatives blood. Kind of like how Voldemort never knew for certain he could split his soul into 7 pieces until he’d done it. Unfamiliar and untested areas of magic.

@Sttennie Ай бұрын

The House was destroyed. There was no home anymore.

@Funkylogic Ай бұрын

Really enjoyed some of the ideas put forward in your post. I thought that it might be a more interesting and complex character if Slytherin was the one to suggest they sacrifice themselves and goes first.

@matthewallen3930 Ай бұрын

Makes sense. Great explanation 👍

@grandmyotismon Ай бұрын

I think quite simply that as fig pointed out the castle is a bastion of ancient magic. A form of magic the 4 founder had acess to and which made them immensely powerful. It is this ancient reservoir of magic used to create and maintain the castle that has been added to by all founders that grant a seemingly atypical level of safety.

@Didymus20X6 Ай бұрын

"Dangers from Dark Wizards." You mean like one who might release a giant magic snake into the plumbing system? Oh, wait...

@davidjmaggs 22 күн бұрын

At mark 10:05 you see Hogwarts Schools latin motto "Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus", I checked with 5 different latin to english translators and it translates too "A Sleeping Dragon never to be Tickled". Either someone in the films props department was taking the p*ss or this is not the motto that J.K.Rowling created.

@meacadwell Ай бұрын

I have a hard time with this theory. Rowena Ravenclaw is pretty much the only founder with a story pertaining to her death and no sacrifice was mentioned. One would think something that important would have been included in the story. However, that doesn't mean any of the other founders couldn't have sacrificed themselves. Although, again, something that important would probably have been included in tales about them...just like it would've been included in Harry Potter's tale. Blood magic was common in many older cultures as 'blood holds the life', when blood leaves a human or animal it dies. So, if anything, they probably used ancient blood magic to protect Hogwarts. What I want to know is where the pensieve came from and why it was just sitting there on the future location of Hogwarts.

@techywill Ай бұрын

Given how many witches and wizards die in battle, I am surprised there aren't more magical love protections.

@richardprice2398 Ай бұрын

Dumbledore has the Elder wand which means he can do any type of magic he wants as long as he can think of it, that's different then being a powerful wizard, it would be cool to think the founder's did this out of love for the school though.

@Espoir1000 Ай бұрын

It is interesting to try to understand each founder's aura and type of powers and abilities, where are they sourced and developed (spiritually and practically) I am sure there is a lot to learn from this perspective

@vaggos013 15 күн бұрын

I would love to watch a film about the 4 founders of Hogwarts. Wizarding World can give us a lot of stories. It's not necesarry everything to be around Harry Potter.

@11BRelo Ай бұрын

I believe this make a lot of sense

@jacegallagher8589 Ай бұрын

Makes sense. Remember the wizarding world gradually lost it's "blood purity" over the years. This means that, over 1000 years, the blood of the 3 Founders who participated in the sacrifice was probably thin enough to break, or at least drastically weaken, the protection to the school. Also, the 3 threats I believe finished off weakening this charm were insider Hogwarts threats from students. The first was Tom Riddle in his time at Hogwarts while researching Horcruxes. This led Voldemort to eventually damaging Rowena's diadem, which may have impacted the spell. Riddle, having been one of the students protected by the charm, could also inadvertently damaged the charm in the same way a spy can damage a military unit more than any outside force could. The 2nd was Ginny Weasley while possessed by Tom's Diary. Again an inside student plus Slytherin influence. The 3rd and final one is Draco Malfoy when he used the cabinets to help the Death Eaters bypass the school's defenses. These 3 events, combined with the passage of time, could have all played a role in defeating the charm protecting Hogwarts. And all 3 of these events tie back to Slytherin House, and therefore Slytherin himself.

@Mr.supergamer20 Ай бұрын

You might have been taking my suggestion from your last video, or it might be a coincidence, I'm not sure, but what I had meant was in Hogwarts Legacy, near the beginning, Professor Fig says something like "Hogwarts was made by, and is in itself a stronghold of that same Ancient Magic," in reference to the Magic that the main character has in game. My question is which of the founders had that Ancient Magic?

@bostonrailfan2427 Ай бұрын

it was also mentioned several times in the books, especially in the last…he’s talking out of his ass about the magic claims, it’s where it is and so strongly protected because of the ancient magic

@kmrskates 28 күн бұрын

This theory doesn't really change anything about Harry Potter in any significant way. It's already known that the sorting hat considers their history/lineage, who they are, what they value, and the potential of who they can become, so nearly all students were sorted correctly. That is because each house represents specific qualities, but people are not limited to those qualities. They are dynamic in their persona. Therefore, the sorting hat sums up all of this information about the student and makes its decision comprehensively

@mecahhannah Ай бұрын

❤ Awesome as always thanks! Love this theory!

@Vakaria-plays 15 күн бұрын

You forget that it is mentioned in the books that Rowena Ravenclaw indeed died but due to illness as she sent the bloody Baron out to find her daughter so she could see her one last time and make peace with her, before she would perish. So she didnt die out due to a sacrifice ritual or anything like that, so as interesting as your theory is, it cannot be true unless you wanna think that only Helga and Godric made the sacrifice alone.

@UpwardsIntoTheRabbitHole Ай бұрын

You are SOOOoOOooo Close!

@user-cx7qv1il8k 6 күн бұрын

"...for, at the mere age of one, Harry was able to walk away..." that's one fantastic boy right there I wonder how far he walked 😂 (not trying to disrespect your video in any way, I just thought the wording was funny)

@AzHades520 Ай бұрын

Don't know why I found your channel, never been that fond of the series. I read the books and watched the movies, although upon seeing that first video continued coming back

@jkrause365 Ай бұрын

Good thinking! One question: Are you suggesting that Salazar Slytherin killed each of the other three founders in duels?

@X_Raven_Volar_X Ай бұрын

idk if the time line matches up but what if the spell ties in to calling Hogwarts home so as long as it has students and a headmaster that call it home the spell will work... and the reason it breaks is because of Dolores Umbridge would never call that place home... breaking the cycle just a thought.

@errornotfound42 Ай бұрын

I subscribe to this theory.

@OnkieJoe Ай бұрын

If the founders sacrificed themselves in order to protect Hogwarts, it was not a selfless act, therefore I don't think it worked. Moreover, the death os James didn't protect Lily as he had no choice. Lily had a choice (because of Snape) but she chose death. Harry also had the choice not to be murdered but he chose death. Maybe the founders sacrifice wasn't about casting the protection charm but they used soke kind of blood magic (which also appears as a very powerful type of magic).

@Ravenblack42 Ай бұрын

Fascinating subject. I wouldn't be surprised to find out one day that most, if not all of your theories are proven to be Canon. Here's another theory. Perhaps the reason that Slytherin House still carries the dark reputation that it does to this day is due to the actions of Salazar Slytherin when the Sorting Hat was created by each of the four Founders. Each of them made provisions to ensure that their legacy, influence, and presence within Hogwarts, continued to exist within the school they had founded even after they had died. Salazar, of course, chose to manifest one of these provisions by means of the Basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets but what if he, after breaking bonds with the other Founders, chose to curse the very house he represented out of sense of spite and betrayal, the same way Tom Riddle cursed the DADA position after Dumbledore denied him the job. In doing so, for generations to come, whatever students the Sorting Hat placed in Slytherin were subject to this curse and its influence during their time at Hogwarts, as a result further contributing to the ill-reputed House of the Serpent as well as reflecting the character and intentions of its founding father Salazar Slytherin.

@bostonrailfan2427 Ай бұрын

Guess you missed the fact that it specifically stated multiple times in the books that the school was founded on a site of strong ancient magic and the part where Helena Ravenclaw mentioned her mother’s declining health and looming death. no mention whatsoever of weakening due to magical sacrifice and if they were sacrificing their lives it would’ve been stated in the books, especially since it’s relating to the protection of the school

@maryholder3795 Ай бұрын

I read a fanfiction that around the ward stone of Hogwarts was the burials of the 4 founders.

@kesemstudio Ай бұрын

First. Great video😊

@RIBill Ай бұрын

I think the sorting hat demonstrates their sacrifice. They each (including Slitheren) left a piece of their soul in the hat. Splitting a soul for evil requires a murder. Splitting a soul for good must require an equal sacrifice for good, right?

@electricheartpony Ай бұрын

Lily needn't have died. Her choice to die at the hands of evil is what casted the spell. Harry also didn't have to die right then.

@TsukabuNosoratori2 29 күн бұрын

My thought is maybe Slytherin had a hand in their deaths. He became so angry at them going against him at every turn- allowing muggle borns, not going after those who persecuted them, etc. And he gained a following, went on the attack for a final confrontation with the other founders to try and take Hogwarts for himself. But the founders weren't having any of his shenanigans anymore, and wound up making the ultimate sacrifice. Forever putting shame on Salazar's name. But the conflict was so violent, so deadly that their students/family who remained chose not to put it in the records. They wanted to focus on the good that the founders did, not how it ended for them. It seems like the kind of thing Salazar would try in the end, and have it not work out for him in any form also.

@hannahlarocco4699 14 күн бұрын

Why?

@TsukabuNosoratori2 14 күн бұрын

@@hannahlarocco4699 Because it's well documented that Salazar Slytherin was one of the worst anti-mudblood people out there and he could have a real nasty streak according to the books, and even Hogwarts Legacy expanded on his lore through one of Sebastian's quests.

@ray101892 Ай бұрын

Hogwarts teacher = no life outside since 1000 years ago because one subject has exactly one teacher x 7 year levels. I wonder if this is why the founders had no descendants. Rowena's daughter was already born before hogwarts and salazar left so his line lived on through the Gaunts.😅

@americasteam2112 Ай бұрын

Hufflepuff did have descendants. Half-Blood Prince shows one of her descendants and other descendants are mentioned.

@ray101892 Ай бұрын

@@americasteam2112 Hepzibah smith only claimed to be a descendant. It's implied that she was not and was just very rich and was obsessed with collecting relics.

@Bobblenob Ай бұрын

If the magic protecting Hogwarts was so strong. How was Voldemort able to attack

@rosestanley9606 Ай бұрын

the thing is at the end of the first book/movie harry says i'm not going home really so there fore he doesn't see the house where his aunt lives as home so if voldy had ever found out where he lived voly could have just waltzed in

@danielgodfrey4415 Ай бұрын

Whatever happened to the other heirs of the founders.

@elijahyoung8116 Ай бұрын

There is actually a fan film called Voldemort origins of the heir it’s on KZfaq and explains everything

@michaelstephens360 Ай бұрын

Tom ate them

@mecahhannah Ай бұрын

Good question

@DefileOdds Ай бұрын

4 minutes in, that's the most beautiful tunnel that you could never get me to step foot in. I've just seen too many true crime videos to know how unsafe it is.

@DefileOdds Ай бұрын

I am Honored❤

@raiderjohnthemadbomber8666 Ай бұрын

I accept your premise. However, to whom and under what circumstances would the founders have sacrificed themselves?

@marcelsgroot Ай бұрын

I have one problem with your theory. In the books the grey lady told Harry that the baron was send after her to bring her home because her mother was dying. If this is true and I think it is because why would she lie. Then Ravenclaw was allready dying so. So if you sacrify yourself while you allready are dying then would it really be a sacrifice? Could it be your theory is correct yet it wasnt three of the founder but two since one was allready dying or even perhaps dead befor the sacrifice?

@dishman4694 Ай бұрын

I’ve always wondered why they, themselves, weren’t the gate keepers. Per se. Like, the fat lady allowing access to the Gryffindor Common. Why not a portrait of Gryffindor Himself?

@futuresonex Ай бұрын

Didn't Ravenclaw get really sick and die? Isn't that why she sent the 'Bloody Baron' to find her daughter (only to have him murder her)? Because she wanted to see her daughter again one last time before she died?

@maegliinvalantor6441 5 күн бұрын

Seems like harry coulda just shown up at his aunts for a weekend in the summer, and then lived just about anywhere else, seems like the Dursleys would be ok with that.

@richewilson6394 Ай бұрын

Lady ravenclaw she died before she could see her daughter which was not something she sacrificed herself for the school at that point she'd rather probably wanted to live as long as she could.

@chinolebron6233 20 күн бұрын

What if Voldemort just k¡ll$ them first? No blood, no bond protection. Wouldn't he have been able to end Harry at that point?

@168tsai8 Ай бұрын

Why does this type of strong magic have to have atime limitation, especially something more defining as exactly 1,000 years. And where are these founders in the moving portraits, or does it not exist at the time of their sacrifice?

@yamahakid450f Ай бұрын

Everyone except Myrtle snd Cedric, I guess...

@baraka490 Ай бұрын

Helga huffed and puffed and blew their houses down

@navodabeyasinghe8599 Ай бұрын

wait why didn't the sacrificial protection kicked in for Lilly Potter? Because James gave his life to save them right? So technically Lilly should be alive?

@PrinceAlberts Ай бұрын

What if Salazar Slytherin killed the other three and their protection was put on the school and students they loved and Slytherin was forced to leave the school afterwards?

@addisonduncan343 Ай бұрын

Have you ever considered "What If... Hogwarts had seven founders?" and their impact?

@hannahlarocco4699 14 күн бұрын

Why seven? There are only four founders and the four houses are their last names.

@addisonduncan343 14 күн бұрын

@hannahlarocco4699 I'm more than aware that there were only four founders and who they were. The question I posed is "WHAT IF..." and I said seven because it's the most powerful magic number.

@susiedyer3260 Ай бұрын

If the love protection spell was on all the students and people at hodwarts why did fred Weasley and lavender brown and all the others die then

@maguswine5 Ай бұрын

How are you ariving at the fact that Hogwarts was founded in 990 AD? That was just when Gryffindor got the hat they use for sorting?

@patricaward9519 Ай бұрын

Do you know what happens to Jacob Kowalski and Queenie

@destinypersona 13 күн бұрын

Him: “conceal Hogwarts from the muggle gaze” My ears: conceal Hogwarts from the muggle gays” 😂😂😂

@LordWyatt Ай бұрын

I wish there was a dedicated Founders Harry Potter film but only if JK Rowling oversaw it. It would be sweet to see a fanfilm by dedicated fans but so many answers could be revealed And to see the houses drift apart so close to the founding is interesting too

@giingy Ай бұрын

Why didn't Dumbledore also use this magic? He sacrificed himself, didn't he?

@moemuxhagi Ай бұрын

No, he was not given the choice to die. He decided to scheme his own death due to being poisoned by the Ring of Gaunt. That's not sacrificial love, that is dramatic flair 😂

@danicagrahek-ogden4444 Ай бұрын

He did, he was protecting Draco who didn't get killed by Voldemort.

@moemuxhagi Ай бұрын

@@danicagrahek-ogden4444 It wasn't sacrificial love ?? Voldemort wanted DUMBLEDORE dead. He got what he asked. And Dumbledore had this death play out as per his own masterplan. Draco was only meant to die if he failed. Sacrificial love is : the TARGET is chosen to die, the PROTECTOR steps in by their own choice, the KILLER tries to toss them away, but the protector CHOSES to stay put and die. This is in absolutely NO WAY Draco's situation.

@rustysm8080 Ай бұрын

It doesn't work the way it seems you are putting it. That sort of protection is against a particular and specific threat...at least how it's been introduced in the books. I think Slytherin is still alive...and was the usurper of Durmstrang after the Headmaster (or was it Headmistress?) mysteriously died. And if HIS mastery of Ancient Magic could extend his life.... There may be a very simple reason the deaths of the Founders of Hogwarts are lost in obscurity and lacked significance in the history of the magical world... They didn't die. Of course, in what manner they survive, it's hard to say. It could be a case of "break glass if all are in mortal peril" abiding tomb for the 3. Suicide would not invoke a protective spell, no matter how "noble" the act. So, I much prefer my theory. 😊 Keep up the good work. I don't have to agree to appreciate your enthusiasm and thoughtfulness of the story. 😊

@LycaonsMemories Ай бұрын

i disagree about the loving protection, if it was so easy to use.. there would be a loooot more instances of it being used. it honestly just seems like an easy way out, which with how poorly jk writes... is understandable

@steve-175 Ай бұрын

How was Riddle able to attack Hogwarts, and people died in the castle if such a spell was in place for wouldn't Dumbledore having died there place the spell to protect Hogwarts too

@aaroncallahan119 Ай бұрын

Salad Bar Slytherin

@JayAlbion Ай бұрын

My theory is that Salazar and Godrick got fed up with the two pushy witches and sailed far, far away starting a new life together. How many muggles in their later life realizes that the opposite sex is tiresome, so wizards with longer lifespan have even grater chance of this realization. What makes me say that they were gay/bi? Like Dumbledore, they were geniuses, sexually aware people are usually from the smarter kind, no offense there alpha chads (wink, wink)

@ianshaw1486 18 күн бұрын

Do you really have to restate your premise at the beginning of videos multiple times? 8 times you stated "Hogwarts's founders were powerful and saw threats they would have protected them from" in different paraphrasing. Say it once and get in with it!

@stewiegriffin5075 Ай бұрын

Why would dark wizards even want to attack schools ??? Voldemort attacked Hogwarts as a way to get at Harry. How many dark wizards before then attacked Hogwarts or any of the other wizarding schools around the world ????

@hannahlarocco4699 14 күн бұрын

I don’t know

@Spawned-uy8ip Ай бұрын

Wow Dumbledore was a terrible man. I mean if a half-trained slacker like Harry could cast a spell that protected hundreds of people, just imagine what Dumbledore could have done. But I guess he just didn't care. What a cold hearted basta*d he was. Or maybe book 7 was just a half arsed, rushed ending full of PIS and plot holes.

@maryholder3795 Ай бұрын

If it doesn't meet Albus'idea of the "Greater Good" then no sacrificial protection would be given by him.

@melanievetter6211 Ай бұрын

😊🎉🦁🏜

@giovannirosa119 16 күн бұрын

Do yall think JK Rowling was thinking this deep? Or is she just the queen of coincidences? Her world building wasn't as massive as GRRM or Tolkiens. Yet incredible connections are made all the time

@gtaonline-oldgiga7729 Ай бұрын

I never understood, if you need to ENTER the wizarding world through special gates (platform 9 3/4 i.e.) , why would they need to actually HIDE anything from sight? It literally is a different world, otherwise everything would be on top of one another, in a masquerade of epic proportions. This is one of the problems with the entire series, sometimes it is hinted that they have all these special world things and then in others they are a hidden group inside the society. I just hate the overall crazy of that. In the end, wizards could have had exterminated muggles easily at any given point in time, specially with Salazar seeing them as mere animals.