"What's 1x1?" Terrence Howard Interview | Chris Vernon Show

  Рет қаралды 250,429

Grind City Media

Grind City Media

6 ай бұрын

----
1-click Subscribe to GCM: bit.ly/subscribe2gcm
Discover the latest Memphis sports community news at: grindcitymedia.com/
~SOCIAL~
Instagram: / grindcitymedia
Twitter: / grindcitymedia
Facebook: / grindcitymedia
Follow the Memphis Grizzlies on KZfaq for exclusive team videos and player highlights: bit.ly/subscribe2memgrizz

Пікірлер: 2 100
@AshSavageTube
@AshSavageTube 10 күн бұрын
Terrance looked in the mirror, saw his reflection and thought he's 2 people. In fact every time he saw his reflection he counted more of himself. Please donate to a Terrance in your neighbourhood, they're everywhere now.
@Snipey1904
@Snipey1904 Күн бұрын
😂😂
@MaxDamageTV
@MaxDamageTV 11 күн бұрын
"If you're not learning to lie by age 4, you're not developing properly." - Terrence Howard
@davidvickers8425
@davidvickers8425 10 күн бұрын
Thats actually in psychology courses for human development
@MaxDamageTV
@MaxDamageTV 10 күн бұрын
@@davidvickers8425 I'm sure it is; the humour comes from the context: since most of what he says (outside of his acting stories) is inaccurate. 😂
@aceluckgame
@aceluckgame 4 күн бұрын
​@@davidvickers8425thanks for the fact.
@Anchor-Supreme
@Anchor-Supreme 26 күн бұрын
It’s actually incredible how many people don’t understand how multiplication works. I’m genuinely terrified about the future of the Western world if this many people can be fooled by an obviously crazy individual.
@officialkiii
@officialkiii 24 күн бұрын
Extremely terrifying, the fact that we’re even discussing it 🥴
@F1083
@F1083 23 күн бұрын
Just wait until the flat earthers and the Terrance cult hook up
@ddegn
@ddegn 11 күн бұрын
@@F1083 Terrence manages to make the flat earthers look smart.
@wehiird
@wehiird 9 күн бұрын
All they gotta say when he starts with his shtick is, “What’s two times one?”
@bobs8005
@bobs8005 9 күн бұрын
@@ddegn*almost makes them look smart
@roi2426
@roi2426 Ай бұрын
There is only one equation being demonstrated in this interview: narcissism x vast ignorance = psychosis
@kahyui2486
@kahyui2486 Ай бұрын
You seem to have an uneducated and ignorant take on psychology. Everyone is a narcissist. The importance is wether your narcissistic pathology causes harm to you or others, in which case we seem that to be unhealthy narcissistic pathology. Nothing in this video suggests that any of these people have an unhealthy pathology. Also one does not need to follow up narcissism with the word ignorance. In order to be narcissistic one must be ignorant to reality or at least not accepting of reality and in turn resorts to a fantasy. Tldr: no
@speez71
@speez71 25 күн бұрын
His first patent (which needs proof, pages of pages of....)
@speez71
@speez71 25 күн бұрын
Made trillions. Is that bs? JR showed that in print? Why are people so afraid of words?
@Mellymellucky17
@Mellymellucky17 23 күн бұрын
I think his concept Of 1X1 is due to a flaw of Comprehension which language can cause but he Can be wrong on this and right about other things like what has patents for… we have to learn that people are not either 100 percent wrong or right
@Ryukikon
@Ryukikon 14 күн бұрын
​@@Mellymellucky17exactly, very intelligent people put out their thoughts and if they are wrong they are corrected that isnhow they grow. Most of the people attacking him do not grow or grow very slowly
@santtu1875
@santtu1875 24 күн бұрын
Bro is mentally insane😂
@jeroen5736
@jeroen5736 9 күн бұрын
i dunno, he could be gaslighting everyone , maybe it is a part for a new role as an actor :)
@aceluckgame
@aceluckgame 7 күн бұрын
​@@jeroen5736he has wasted a lot of money for this act though.
@marioculcasi
@marioculcasi 7 күн бұрын
The biggest false awakening traps are: Higher self, Ascension road, ascended Masters realm, Kundalini, Chakras. All of them total Trap into 8th sphere of Lower Astral Underworld. By that surrending the Energies to the Matrix and demiurge. 💙✊🏽💎
@EinsteinKnowedIt
@EinsteinKnowedIt 4 күн бұрын
This man is earth's rightful ruler 😊
@marioculcasi
@marioculcasi 4 күн бұрын
@@EinsteinKnowedIt Deep source hug my dear 💙 stay connected in the moment flow as one 😘✊🏽🌊
@TheEngineeringHub
@TheEngineeringHub 20 күн бұрын
Bro finds people who can't do math and gives them an 8th grade math trick which has nothing strange about it and claims he cracked the universe. Jeeeez😂
@witzend4636
@witzend4636 14 күн бұрын
It's so much more than that on so many levels
@TheEngineeringHub
@TheEngineeringHub 13 күн бұрын
@witzend4636 What is then so strange about this equlity: sqrt(2)*sqrt(2)*sqrt(2) = 2*sqrt(2) ? Of course sqrt(2)*sqrt(2) = 2 duh
@witzend4636
@witzend4636 13 күн бұрын
Just because you weren’t able to understand anything that Terrance was explaining doesn’t mean he is wrong. You probably never watched the podcast or it was your first introduction to the topics. I get that you are stuck in linear thinking and are having a difficult time believing you’ve been hoodwinked but I believe you’ll get there. His knowledge is a true gift and it will take time for the collective to utilize the truths he reveals. Stay deadly
@TheEngineeringHub
@TheEngineeringHub 13 күн бұрын
@witzend4636 it's true I couldn't understand what he is talking about. And it is entirely possible that he has cracked some sort of a secret. But I happen to know a bit more about math, and that's the thing that I challenged, not the rest of the things he is talking about. If you look him up from 10-15 years ago, he was still talking like this and how he has figured out how to cure cancer, yet none of this miraculous technology has ever been used to do any good, so idk..
@witzend4636
@witzend4636 13 күн бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub to the cancer point, it is clear that the powers that be don't want to cure anyone of anything. In fact 'they' are set on keeping people sick. Look at our poisonous food supply
@anthonyricciardo
@anthonyricciardo 2 ай бұрын
Terrence's Mistake in a Mathematical Concept: Imagine you have a penny, which is just a single coin. If someone asks you how much one penny times another penny is, it might sound a bit strange because we usually don't multiply money this way. But let's explore this idea together! Multiplication: The Grouping Concept Multiplication is like making groups of things. For example, if you have 1 box and put 1 penny in it, you still have just 1 penny. It doesn't magically double! So, if you multiply 1 by 1 penny, you're not really making more pennies. You still have just that 1 penny, not 2. Note: we said 1 x 1 penny AND NOT 1 penny x 1 penny Understanding Units When we talk about multiplying things, we also have to think about what they are (their units). For example, if you multiply 1 inch by 1 inch, you get 1 square inch, which is a measure of area. This makes sense because inches measure length, and when you multiply them, you're finding out how much space something covers. But what about our pennies? Pennies are money, not lengths or areas. So, if you try to multiply a penny by a penny, you end up with something called "penny squared," which doesn't make sense in real life. There's no such thing as a "penny squared" in your piggy bank or wallet. Adding vs. Multiplying When you have two pennies, you simply add them together to know you have 2 pennies in total. This is adding, not multiplying. Adding is when you put things together to see how much you have in total. Bringing It All Together So, when we talk about 1 penny multiplied by 1 penny, it's likely a mistake to think about it in this way. When you're saying 1 penny x 1 penny, what you're talking about is having 1 group of 1 penny. It's important to remember that this still equals just 1 penny. It doesn't magically turn into 2 pennies just because we used multiplication. Multiplication helps us understand how many things we have in groups, but it doesn't change the amount when we're talking about... 1 group of 1. To clarify, the correct way to think about and write the concept of 1 penny x 1 penny is to see it as 1 group times 1 penny, or simply 1 x 1 penny. The real question multiplication helps answer is: How many groups of pennies do you have? This is what multiplication is truly about. Understanding multiplication in this way helps us see that it's a method for organizing and counting things in groups, rather than changing the nature or amount of what we have. This distinction is crucial in avoiding confusion and ensuring that we apply mathematical concepts correctly in real-world situations. Remember, in mathematics, clarity and precision in how we express and interpret concepts are key. By refining our understanding of multiplication and the units involved, we can avoid misconceptions and build a more accurate picture of the math at work in our daily lives. Money and Math When it comes to money, like pennies, we usually talk about adding them together to find out how much we have. If we have 10 boxes and each box has 10 pennies, that's 10 times 10 pennies, which means 100 pennies in total because we have 10 groups of 10. It's the same with just 1 penny; 1 group of 1 penny is still just 1 penny. Conclusion So, remember, multiplication is about groups and how many things are in those groups. We can't multiply pennies and get more pennies out of nowhere. And when we're talking about units like inches or pennies, we need to think about what those units mean and how they work in real life. I hope this helps clear things up! Multiplication and units can be tricky, but once you understand how they work, it makes a lot more sense. ------------------------------- ZERO: Understanding multiplication involves recognizing it as a method for combining multiple groups of the same size. The concepts of 1 and 0 play essential roles in this process, each serving a unique purpose that is integral to mathematical operations at all levels. The Role of 1 in Multiplication The number 1 is the identity element for multiplication. This means that when you multiply any number by 1, the result is the number itself. This property doesn't diminish the value of 1 in multiplication; instead, it provides a fundamental basis that ensures consistency across mathematical operations. When you multiply a number by 1, you're essentially saying you have one group of that number. Far from being irrelevant, this operation is crucial for maintaining the integrity of mathematical principles. The Role of 0 in Multiplication Similarly, 0 plays a critical role in multiplication. Multiplying any number by 0 gives a result of 0. This reflects the concept that if you have zero groups of something, you end up with nothing. This isn't a sign that 0 'doesn’t multiply' but rather that it applies the rule of having nothing in a consistent and predictable way across all numbers. The existence of this rule makes mathematical operations reliable and understandable, enabling us to build more complex equations and solve more intricate problems. Why "True Multiplication" Includes 1 and 0 The idea of "true multiplication" only starting at 2 disregards the foundational roles that 1 and 0 play in the broader framework of mathematics. Every number, including 1 and 0, has a place in multiplication because they help us understand and organize the world in a consistent manner. To exclude 1 and 0 from multiplication or to give their interactions with other numbers different terms would not only complicate mathematical education but also undermine the coherence and simplicity of mathematics itself. Conclusion In mathematics, clarity, consistency, and universality are key. The rules for 1 and 0 in multiplication provide us with a stable foundation from which we can explore and understand more complex concepts. These numbers allow us to express and solve problems accurately, whether we're dealing with the theoretical underpinnings of mathematics or applying math to real-world situations. Therefore, rather than being excluded or renamed, the roles of 1 and 0 should be embraced for the critical functions they serve within the realm of multiplication.
@chillinx7268
@chillinx7268 2 ай бұрын
That was a life lesson in itself.
@JB-qm7vt
@JB-qm7vt 2 ай бұрын
Someone please send this person’s explanation to Terence
@INeedsMoneys
@INeedsMoneys 2 ай бұрын
@@JB-qm7vtthis person misinterpreted terrence tho. Terrence is saying 1 penny times 1 penny equals 2 pennies because of the conservation of energy principle. 2 pennies cant become 1. The person who wrote the small piece of advice here is missing the forest for the trees.
@garymurakami4867
@garymurakami4867 2 ай бұрын
Omg there is a simpler way to say it😅
@tyronewilliams3634
@tyronewilliams3634 2 ай бұрын
This is an example of why our country is screwed. We take for granted what is told to us without being able to verify or confirm it. If only one of my friends, me included, have a brain, then all together we have one brain (1x1=1). If 100 of us have a brain, then we have 100 brains (1x100=100). If none of us have a brain, then we are screwed (1x0=0). I don’t know anything about energy conversion theory but if basic arithmetic is not suitable then maybe another tool should be used or created.
@LOLA-mx7jm
@LOLA-mx7jm 26 күн бұрын
Who’s here because of Rogan….? And this man was greater but is now more great after listening to him chop game on JoRo.
@KPSavant
@KPSavant 26 күн бұрын
🙌
@jermieldeleon
@jermieldeleon 22 күн бұрын
Facts ! Joe let him cook that whole episode..and I’m grateful for that!.loved it
@tom_mac
@tom_mac 21 күн бұрын
TLDR: this whole thing is him just misunderstanding how digital computers (calculators) work. the thing he did here with the calculators, his misunderstanding, its because our phones are digital computers. digital computers are actually physically unable to perform calculations using irrational numbers, like the square root of 2. it's literally impossible. if you had an analogue (or quantum) computer and you performed this maths, it would come out as expected, though. see, with a digital calculator you only get so many bits you can use to store a number in memory to perform operations on it, so when you do operations using irrational (irrational numbers go on literally forever after the decimal point) you aren't actually using that number precisely you are instead using an approximation, a rounded off number as close as possible. this works good enough when you are using smaller transformative functions, but the more drastically you change the number through a mathematical operation the greater the inaccuracy becomes, sometimes becoming so far off that the results are utterly useless. this is also why different calculators give different results when working with irrational numbers, because they sometimes have different numbers of bits assigned express a number. for example, an old Casio calculator can only hold 9 digits past the decimal of an irrational number such as pi, so it wraps the 9th decimal place to the nearest sub-number whereas an iPhones calculator with 64 bits used for calculator number memory can hold 16 decimal places before it rounds off - so if you do "pi x 3" on an old Casio, you'll get a different result to the same operation done on an iphone calculator. it's also what you'd get if you did these calculations manually, because at some point you have to decide to round the number off, you literally cant work with irrational calculations without rounding off and entering the realm of approximation, unless you have an analogue computer. think of an analogue computer as being like an abstracted simulation using representative psychical processes, then measuring the changes in the internal parts which moved, as opposed to a digital computer which has little binary switches in it arranged in a pattern to represent things. Terrance often uses things like this which rely on noone in the audience understanding some fundamental feature involved to erroneously explain/justify his instinctual thoughts and feelings about a thing and it's honestly pretty impressive even though it's nonsense. he makes links between things in places where they don't logically follow, constantly, which is a symptom consistent with a few mental illnesses including bipolar and schizophrenia. Dunno which he is suffering from but surely something. I can see how it would be convincing to many, especially how he speaks with charisma and confidence, but it's little more than mental illness and solipsistic narcissism at play. This is what happens when you live in a world of yes men, where noone dares calls your BS, for a lifetime. sorry for the long ass essay lol.
@datmeme8967
@datmeme8967 21 күн бұрын
As long as you realize what a clown show that was. Bro convinced himself that 1x1=2. I'm sure you know the formula for the area of a rectangle? L x W = Area? So how many square feet are there in a 1 foot by 1 foot floor tile? 2? Also, what is he waiting for to demonstrate a flying linchpin? It's been years since he tried scamming the country of Ghana into investing in it and he still hasn't done anything but pay someone to do some computer animations. He claims he has revolutionized so many industries. Name one? Only thing I credit him with is a very rudimentary abandoned patent on a general concept that could be called augmented reality. The rest is like someone who can fake a bunch of words in Chinese being able to convince other people who don't speak Chinese that they are fluent in Chinese. An entertaining and worthless talent.
@PdWOLFG4NG
@PdWOLFG4NG 21 күн бұрын
🙏
@AmCanTech
@AmCanTech 22 күн бұрын
Crazy begins at 22:30
@TimothyC.84
@TimothyC.84 18 күн бұрын
🐐
@sik787
@sik787 17 күн бұрын
@@TimothyC.84 he did invent a new form a flight
@TimothyC.84
@TimothyC.84 17 күн бұрын
@@sik787 No he did not lol
@calokid
@calokid 17 күн бұрын
​@@sik787 He claims that. Seems like he swindled Uganda. It's been 2 years.
@sik787
@sik787 17 күн бұрын
@@calokid ive reasearched videos dating back 4 years he talks about it, then puts out a competition for a tangent drone. I have not seen or heard of this shape drones.
@RajivSamaroo
@RajivSamaroo 24 күн бұрын
Sorry but of course (sq root 2) cubed is equal to (sq root 2) x 2. What is so confusing about that? Terrence should put on a robe and talk abt happiness and the meaning of life, I’m sure he has a lot of wisdom there. But his math and science are totally bogus. Also, 1x1 means you have one occurrence of 1. So of course it means 1. You can’t disprove math because you think the word multiply means create more. Wait till he discovers multiplying by fractions. 🤣🤯
@drsjamesserra
@drsjamesserra 20 күн бұрын
I had a discussion on X about it, somehow a defender didn’t see the point, unbelievable how ignorant people are and how many didn’t pay attention in math class.
@oui2611
@oui2611 19 күн бұрын
i mean youre arguing against someone whos againdt the established facts so of course its going to seem bogus because he isnt following the established methods. im not saying he's right, im just saying its pretty obvious to say he's wrong.
@RajivSamaroo
@RajivSamaroo 19 күн бұрын
@@oui2611 okie
@JohnNoone-bv5bi
@JohnNoone-bv5bi 19 күн бұрын
😂 multiply does mean to create more. Just because this challenges your current beliefs or teachings doesn’t mean to say that what he’s saying is wrong. We’ve been lied to about lots of things in history so why wouldn’t they lie about this? Any Trillion dollar industries that are threatened by his theories will have paid bots and trolls come out to assassinate his character and works. You can see this in every terrence Howard video it’s so obvious. Keep an open mind is all I’m saying.
@brendanbiddle4875
@brendanbiddle4875 19 күн бұрын
Glad somebody caught this. He’s taking the square root of a number then cubing the number. You will never get back to the original number by cubing it. The two processes are not the same and therefore Terrence’s theory is dead.
@cheezius3357
@cheezius3357 26 күн бұрын
Greatest quote of all time “Am I crazy or is the calculator broken” - Terrance Howard
@SchMasHed
@SchMasHed 24 күн бұрын
Hes crazy
@cheezius3357
@cheezius3357 24 күн бұрын
@@SchMasHed nah the calculator can’t handle the truth.
@SchMasHed
@SchMasHed 24 күн бұрын
@@cheezius3357 The calculator is largely responsible for your ability to leave a comment on a video that you watched on the internet LMFAO
@cheezius3357
@cheezius3357 24 күн бұрын
@@SchMasHed ok but that has nothing to do with the point of my comment. Anyways have a good one 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@ZerosiiniFIN
@ZerosiiniFIN 24 күн бұрын
​@@cheezius3357 It has verything to do with it. You're saying calcs are not correct. If they were not correct, all this ICT would not work
@hectorcotto5310
@hectorcotto5310 15 күн бұрын
"A dime multiplied by a dime equals a penny" - Terence Howard
@joelstanley993
@joelstanley993 23 күн бұрын
He needs his own podcast called Terrance does bad math.
@dbuck2862
@dbuck2862 22 күн бұрын
you do know that math has never been 100% right, it the closest equation that solve the problem. This is why you can get a solid number with point behind it that go on to infinity after a calculation. example 192.034434434----- they teach you this in middle school math. so if he is saying that math isn't right he close to right as they used old method that been used to now, and new technology could prove their a better math system that we never new until now.
@MaxDamageTV
@MaxDamageTV 11 күн бұрын
😂
@aceluckgame
@aceluckgame 4 күн бұрын
​@@dbuck2862if you were to remove every irregular numbers, then math just wouldn't function at all. Concepts like imaginary numbers are essential in Mathematics.
@thaburninator0904
@thaburninator0904 2 ай бұрын
Im so annoyed right now because I got click baited into this Terrance Howard video sometime earlier this week, and now I am stuck in a section of youtube with 0x1 people that know how multiplication works.
@VoidChakra
@VoidChakra Ай бұрын
If 1x1= 1+1 =2 then 3 x 3 = 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1= 12 but in real life if I have 3 pigs and I have to feed them 3 bag each I still need 9 because pig 1 gets 3 pig 2 gets 3 and pig 3 gets 3. Still I need 9 bags. So how does 3 + 3 + 3 = 9 but 3 x 3 = 12
@Unizuka
@Unizuka Ай бұрын
​@@VoidChakrabro 3 x 3 is the same as 3 + 3 + 3, it's like saying you have a 3 cartons, each carton contains 3 apples, so how many apples you have in total? 3 + 3 + 3 = 9 apples
@bandupjosh7709
@bandupjosh7709 Ай бұрын
@@VoidChakra 3x3=9
@Player-gx1eo
@Player-gx1eo Ай бұрын
People need to go back to first grade if they think that 1x1=2. They just don't understand the basics
@Accoooo-mufc
@Accoooo-mufc Ай бұрын
@@Player-gx1eo2
@MatthewMS.
@MatthewMS. 13 күн бұрын
This story and content will be my favorite for many years. He is something else. 😅
@richardsmith4964
@richardsmith4964 19 күн бұрын
Crazy x Crazy= Terrence Howard
@charlespockert8948
@charlespockert8948 5 күн бұрын
No, that's not true - by his logic Crazy x Crazy = 2 Terrence Howards.
@khalifaal-islam5729
@khalifaal-islam5729 5 ай бұрын
When your basics are faulty... You laugh at truth
@kevenbates4313
@kevenbates4313 2 ай бұрын
In this case yes, but be cautious in never questioning the basics. It's that type of thinking that led Plank to say science advances 1 funeral at a time. The relationship between Newtonian physics and Quantum has everyone's pencils rolling off the desk but no one wants to double-check the foundation.
@kreasenchetty
@kreasenchetty 2 ай бұрын
@@kevenbates4313 Yes, I agree with you, but to apply Quantum physics logic to manipulate pure mathematic laws is idiotic and irresponsible. His "revelation" will get the ignorant more confused. Until he can prove the pseudo science, best he stick to his popularity contest through acting.
@kevenbates4313
@kevenbates4313 2 ай бұрын
@@kreasenchetty Salty lmao
@shyheemjohnson9100
@shyheemjohnson9100 2 ай бұрын
@@kevenbates4313 this is true but there’s nothing wrong with an open mind
@shyheemjohnson9100
@shyheemjohnson9100 2 ай бұрын
Not saying he right or wrong
@percyjones8376
@percyjones8376 24 күн бұрын
I’ve completely lost all faith in humanity
@C-Llama
@C-Llama 21 күн бұрын
Only gets worse when you read the comments. People with zero education confidently challenging the definition of multiplication. wtf is wrong with our species
@erraticentertainment
@erraticentertainment 20 күн бұрын
Good you lacked the iq necessary to understand simple concepts
@JimmyCooperAustralia
@JimmyCooperAustralia 20 күн бұрын
Na - it's just a small percentage of really loud dumb ones.
@idicula1979
@idicula1979 20 күн бұрын
FOR LYING TO ME. Terrance Howard 2024
@JohnNoone-bv5bi
@JohnNoone-bv5bi 19 күн бұрын
@@idicula1979lying How?…..because he’s challenging your beliefs? Because nothing ever gets proved wrong throughout history and must be changed because new discoveries have been made? Sure. At least keep an open mind, this is why we are stuck in this way of thinking because people aren’t willing to think outside the box and only accept the so called scholars teachings. There certainly is truth to this otherwise why are the bots and trolls out in force to character assassinate and dismiss his work it’s so obvious. Anything that challenges trillions dollar industries must be suppressed but truth will over come lies.
@cartorx1261
@cartorx1261 6 ай бұрын
if you have 2 apples once you have 2 apples. 2 apple twice you have 4 apple, that's simple and satisfied bro. 1 apple once you have One apple still. 1 apple 4 times you have 4 apples
@jankopandza1072
@jankopandza1072 4 ай бұрын
multiplication is a form of addition. Multiplication is an addition of like amounts. example 2+2+2 = 6 / 2 x 3 = 6 ... the problem he is talking about is that the problem starts with number 1 ... 1+1 = 2 yet 1x 1 = 1 ? if you did not understand let me make it more simple.. 7+7 = 49 why do we use multiplication ? so we do not have to use addition .. 7+7+7+7+7+7+7 = 49 .. so i hope you understood the problem . 1+1 = 2 so why is 1x1 = 1 .. that is where the problem starts
@AriyahandTiffanie
@AriyahandTiffanie 4 ай бұрын
@@jankopandza1072Exactly!!!!!! If you have 1 Apple and multiply it by 1. There will be 2 apples I always questioned this when I was in elementary school. I told my daughter when she started school. I don't know why 1x1=1 And 0x1=0 Bcuz it makes no sense. But it's what we're taught in school so just play along. But we know the real answers 😂
@unknwnTea
@unknwnTea 4 ай бұрын
​@@AriyahandTiffanieif you have 1 apple only once you would only have one apple and that's how × works, you take a number and see how many times you have it (hence why × is also called times) like how 1×2 is 2 and not 3 because you're not adding, you're answering how many times 1 shows up which is twice and that's why 1×1 is 1 because its 1 shown only once not twice or you'd be adding (+) and not multiplying (×)
@unknwnTea
@unknwnTea 4 ай бұрын
​@jankopandza1072 you proved your own statement false very quickly there lol. You're saying 2+2+2=6 which is 2×3=6 which is correct and also proves that 1×1=1 as you're showing that the original number (2) shown 3 times becomes 6 whilst 1×1 would mean the original number (1) is shown 1 time which is 1 meaning 1×1=1 and 1×2 is 2 and not 3 (which would just be adding) because the original number (1) is being shown 2 times which is 2
@irish3353
@irish3353 4 ай бұрын
@AriyahandTiffanie let's say you're out for a walk, and you see one apple once. How many apples did you see. You saw one apple one time, so you only saw one apple. That's multiplication. Another way to think of it is that a multiplication equation is setting up an addition equation. The first number tells you which number you'll be adding, and the second shows how many times that number appears in the addition equation. Take your 7×7=49. 7+7+7+7+7+7+7=49. The number 7 appeared 7 times. Move this to 1×1, so the number 1 will appear 1 time. 1 = 1, thus 1×1=1. Multiplication indicates the amount of times something occurs. Whether it be a sighting of apples or a number.
@DustinGunnells
@DustinGunnells 5 ай бұрын
He was good in Electric Dreams TOO!
@roxanneharris7435
@roxanneharris7435 3 ай бұрын
Terence Howard is one of a kind I believe he's a genius. And he made a lot of sense to me. People always say people who are different are crazy. People who are different see the light they are chosen. Thank you Terrence Howard For sharing your knowledge.
@chriscolby4578
@chriscolby4578 2 ай бұрын
Even as kid we question these things yet we get told, it's right just because we say so.
@thakurv1
@thakurv1 2 ай бұрын
Or you were just a child and still think like a child
@chriscolby4578
@chriscolby4578 2 ай бұрын
@@thakurv1 or its time to evolve and change the way we do things or does that scare you "change"
@chriscolby4578
@chriscolby4578 2 ай бұрын
@@thakurv1 and I bet you believe that the great pyramid of Giza was just a tomb for a king just like you were told to believe so.
@ethanivey8018
@ethanivey8018 2 ай бұрын
@@chriscolby4578Literally everything he said in his math segment was just spewing nonsense. Anybody who has gone through proper algebra knows there is no “mathematical fallacy” in his loop
@johnsmith-ik4xp
@johnsmith-ik4xp 4 күн бұрын
The definition of the "x" symbol in a multiplication table means groups of. So 3 groups of 8 is 24 . So therefore 1 group of 1 equals 1. The basic requirements of math is that you understand English first. So the calculator is correct.
@WilliamLester-lt5sv
@WilliamLester-lt5sv Ай бұрын
Chris u the Man ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Great interview
@Ynaffit_76
@Ynaffit_76 5 ай бұрын
I've always known that Cardi is smarter than what ppl have been giving her credit for..Cardi will be doing fine I do believe 2024 will be her year..everybody gotta go thru their pain first before they get back up..this pain will bring out the best of her later
@dreddmann9292
@dreddmann9292 5 ай бұрын
just because someone was being dumb yesterday doesn't mean that they are being dumb today. we all continue to learn and grow, learning is not just a 1 time thing. it's an everyday thing. we all have the ability to learn and we all have been guilty of just being dumb.
@capwb
@capwb 2 ай бұрын
She used to drug and rob people
@s133p3r0
@s133p3r0 Ай бұрын
@@dreddmann9292 You are confusing intelligence with wisdom. You can be dumb and still have wisdom. Intelligence is your capacity for problem solving and understanding. It has nothing to do with growing or learning.
@NickiePaschal
@NickiePaschal 5 ай бұрын
I love hero 6 that's one of me and favorite Disney movies❤❤❤
@Dubmayer
@Dubmayer 12 күн бұрын
It is an act! He says the exact same words everywhere! But it gets difficult for him when he gets interrupted and is not in control of the narrative!
@michaelandersen4484
@michaelandersen4484 2 ай бұрын
how come when I go to the shop with 1 trolley and I put 1 item in it ... I only have 1 item in my trolley ... shouldn't there be 2 items in my trolley if ... 1 x 1 = 2
@ochodamagician2212
@ochodamagician2212 2 ай бұрын
Anybody else here after seein Terrance Howard interview wit the wig on 😅
@jayempowers
@jayempowers Ай бұрын
I'm here after watching THAT interview, then after watching his full Oxford Address! This man is a genius In Real Life!!
@plantpapi614
@plantpapi614 Ай бұрын
That wasn’t a Wig
@ochodamagician2212
@ochodamagician2212 Ай бұрын
@@plantpapi614 what was it then?
@mangugas837
@mangugas837 Ай бұрын
it was a wig...he was coming off a movie set, look it up
@argonlitium2837
@argonlitium2837 22 күн бұрын
@@jayempowers "This man is a genius In Real Life!!" you are imbecil
@trystenriddle3736
@trystenriddle3736 Ай бұрын
24:11 🧠 1x1 Equation Begins
@lisaogembo473
@lisaogembo473 3 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@aminkanji5074
@aminkanji5074 5 күн бұрын
This guy is nuts
@denbunk7815
@denbunk7815 23 күн бұрын
7:32 is probably the best explanation of Terrance Howard "Incredibly strange"
@beergut8915
@beergut8915 24 күн бұрын
The first 1 is what you have The second 1 is how many times you have it
@lakeshamayes722
@lakeshamayes722 3 ай бұрын
If someone would have told me this in second grade, I may have liked Math more instead of history; AND the Kaleidoscope obsession as a kid!!! This was on point!!! Nice.
@scottmorrison1561
@scottmorrison1561 22 күн бұрын
Do you get that 1x1=1 though, because one lot of something counted once, equals once. To do 2x2 would be two lots of something, counted twice; that means theres four lots. If you have one lot of something counted zero times (1x0) then it wouldn't be counted at all (because you times'd it by none, zero (no times)). Language is imperfect, so I understand that 1x1 can be confusing; but ultimately with multiplication were talking about how many groups of something there are after counting them all up. Terrence is getting confused around the language used with multiplication, which leads him to conceptualise math incorrectly.
@pwayne219
@pwayne219 21 күн бұрын
​@@scottmorrison1561 It doesn't make sense if you think about it. If you multiply something zero times (2×0=0) why is it zero and not the number. Why does the number go away if u multiplied it zero times?
@scottmorrison1561
@scottmorrison1561 21 күн бұрын
@@pwayne219 All I can say is that language is imperfect and the word 'multiply' by the way we usually define it might not be the perfect word for it, since we already have an established concept of what that word means outside of a math context. If you want to understand what multiplication is and what it is not I'd suggest looking it up. Once you understand the idea in full then feel free to critique it again; but I'd recommend understanding it in full first.
@help4343
@help4343 20 күн бұрын
@@pwayne219 Because if you have no(zero) 2s you don't have it, do you?
@A_Stereotypical_Guy
@A_Stereotypical_Guy 10 күн бұрын
​@@pwayne219I'll try to simplify it...because in multiplication you are ALWAYS solving for the constituent parts of groups, one number represents a group of things, the other represents the parts that make up that group. Say you have 0 groups of 2 things (0x2), that equals zero things, because there are 0 groups of things available to contain those 2 things. Say you have 2 groups of 0 things (2x0), you still have 0 things, because both of those groups contains a total of 0 of those things. Say you have a pencil box representing the group, and pencils themselves representing the parts. And someone says to lay 0 boxes of 2 pencils on the table (0x2) there will be 0 pencils on the table. If someone says lay 2 boxes, each containing 0 pencils on the table (2x0) there will still be 0 pencils on the table. And I understand what you're asking, you're saying ok but there are still 2 groups, 2 boxes, so why can't we say 2? It's just the arbitrary rules of this language we invented man, we don't solve for groups, we defined those rules long ago and we have to universally agree to them so that they work.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 23 күн бұрын
I saw some comments on Professor Dave Explains' channel about some nutjob named Terrence Howard, and I just assumed: oh, surely that's not the ACTOR Terrence Howard who stars as Rhodie in the first Iron Man movie (2008). So I did a search on YT just now... OH FUCKING SHIT! It IS the same person! MY GOD it proves acting requires NO BRAINS!
@davehooper6481
@davehooper6481 20 күн бұрын
He should try taking on the role of a sane person.
@miraclelove991
@miraclelove991 20 күн бұрын
Love Terrence🎉🎉🎉🎉💙💙💙💙💙💙💙❤️💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
@user-hj2sm9gk5n
@user-hj2sm9gk5n 2 ай бұрын
You're so smart Pal . 👏👏👏👏
@brandiepittman
@brandiepittman 2 ай бұрын
I love this podcast. The fundamentals to love of life.
@HellHeater
@HellHeater 11 күн бұрын
like how multiplying 1 by 1 comes out to 2?
@paolaespino1437
@paolaespino1437 3 ай бұрын
Always said that empire and hustle and flow were a continuation 🔥
@ReneeJohnsonakaRaeJ
@ReneeJohnsonakaRaeJ 2 ай бұрын
Yessss! You said it!! 🙌🏽
@dylancleveland
@dylancleveland 10 күн бұрын
Continuation of what? his brain rot and disordered ego? lmao
@CreativeRecipeswithKaren
@CreativeRecipeswithKaren 2 ай бұрын
OK, so 2X2 is 2 then. This only occurs with 1X1. 2X2 is 4 and 3x3 is 9, 4X4 16. It is expanding. We agree that multiplication is exaggerated/shorter version of addition. Or is 3x3 =6. Please explain. 1X1 is 2 if you add or multiply right. The same is true if you do 2x2. It's 4 whether you add or multiply. Is that what he is saying although he does not talk investigate 2. But once you get to 3, then 3X3 is 9 and it cannot be 6 if you decide to add the two numbers. But if you do 3X3X3 which is what 3X3 means it is 27.
@sarachigod
@sarachigod 2 ай бұрын
1×1=2×2=4 😂
@tonyaquino_photography4838
@tonyaquino_photography4838 12 күн бұрын
Watch the Joe Rogan podcast with him
@user-me7dv4it2e
@user-me7dv4it2e 3 сағат бұрын
This guy loves the sound of his voice ...
@fetB
@fetB Ай бұрын
24:18 not necessarily, it describes how often a thing exists
@legatesfamily
@legatesfamily 22 күн бұрын
its crazy that he explains the fun facts of 1*1=1 to get peoples minds turning because his real discovery is so beyond the simple math equations that if you can see the problems with the simple math then you wont see the errors on bigger equations
@347LisaLisa
@347LisaLisa 22 күн бұрын
Yes because our equations in math are sentences the reasoning comes more from sentence structure than empirical (universal) math which is toroidal and causal (cause and effect).So 1 and 1 again is two ones therefore 2. Best I can understand so far❤
@das_it_mane
@das_it_mane 22 күн бұрын
Sorry to say you didn't understand anything because there's nothing to understand. He's simply wrong.
@Binahx86
@Binahx86 22 күн бұрын
@@das_it_mane He is wrong, but he is just trying to fix what's wrong. He talks about 1 because math itself is wrong, e.g, we can multiply by 0 but we cant divide by it, how is that possible? So he is right to say there is something wrong, his solution is wrong i agree.
@qwertzundefinedapfel3830
@qwertzundefinedapfel3830 22 күн бұрын
"[...]because his real discovery is so beyond the simple math equations" Actually his real discovery is quite simple, if effective: If you talk enough garbage there will be people who think this isn't garbage but higher wisdom and are willing to pay a lot of money for it.
@humanbean3
@humanbean3 21 күн бұрын
@@siliconvalleymetal its semantics as far as I can tell. maybe he wants to change the word "multiply" or something. our math has gotten us to the moon and back for god's sake. the actual math can calculate how an object can rubberband and boost off a distant planet's gravity and propel an object to intercept with another object that is orbiting the earth at 35k miles an hour, with the precision of inches. how is this math wrong ?
@DoYouDJ
@DoYouDJ 20 күн бұрын
Thanks for this you is not lyin.
@ReneeJohnsonakaRaeJ
@ReneeJohnsonakaRaeJ 2 ай бұрын
Yes, Terrence… come on with that Union!! You have the power… don’t need permission!!!
@Channel-io1di
@Channel-io1di 9 күн бұрын
Man this comments section is actually one of the better ones I've seen. It's terrifying on other channels like 95% of comments are literally agreeing with him.
@Johnny2Feathers
@Johnny2Feathers 7 күн бұрын
Really? My experience has been that he’s getting mocked in the comments everywhere his JRE clip is. He’s getting it worse than the flat earth people get it 🤣🤣🤣
@Channel-io1di
@Channel-io1di 7 күн бұрын
@Johnny2Feathers dude, people are supporting the crazy shit that terrence howard guy said like 90% in the comments I know it's insane.
@Channel-io1di
@Channel-io1di 7 күн бұрын
@Johnny2Feathers I just basically restated my original comment I guess. It seems we agree, but I'm saying this comment section seems to have more people with a full set of chromosomes and no extra.
@erdtree_larry
@erdtree_larry 5 ай бұрын
So if I go 1mph for 1 hr(1mi/hr x 1hr), how far have I gone? 1 x 1 = 1 AND (mi/hr) x (hr) = miles. So if you go 1 mi/hr for 1 hr, you have gone a distance of 1 mile in that time. If you turn on your faucet and put a pitcher underneath and it's flowing 1 L/min of water for 1 min, you will have a volume of 1L in that pitcher. L/min × min = L.
@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again
@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again 3 ай бұрын
@@OrganicReasoningIt’s incredible how you’ve taken simple math that a child can understand and turned it into word salad that a grownup would lose their mind trying to apply logic to. It’s as if you’ve decided that because you can’t pronounce the letter $, red is actually potato and it definitely smells like 4.
@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again
@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again 3 ай бұрын
@@OrganicReasoning Sorry, I made a typo. Read what I said again. You might want to retract your "like" unless you are trolling for responses like mine.
@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again
@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again 3 ай бұрын
@OrganicReasoning then carry on the good work sir
@soundmedicine1210
@soundmedicine1210 3 ай бұрын
Yeah I think Terrence means this. With your 1mph per hour comparison inded you have driven 1 hour x 1 mile = 1 mile. But the 1 hour you used is also energy and still exists even though you only look at the mile. But 1 mile and 1 hour stay seperate and dont add up to 2 miles.
@erdtree_larry
@erdtree_larry 3 ай бұрын
@@soundmedicine1210 We're not only considering one side. We're taking into account both of the items, it's just that they cancel out. This is called Dimensional Analysis, and it's how we get proper units. In this case it is (mile/hour) x (hour) = (mile x hour)/(hour) = (mile)...so the hours just cancel out, but it's important to realize that they are not ignored. It's similar to multiplying 2/3 x 3 = 2. Each item is considered, including with words(units), and that is also the case if you were to square them. For example (Pressure in psi or Lbs/in^2) = (Force)/(Area) = (Force in lbs)/(Area in square inches or in^2). We can rearrange this to find (Force) = (Pressure) x (Area) = (lbs/in^2) x (in^2) = lbs. Check out Dimensional Analysis...it's actually pretty cool, and it gets you thinking about all of the units you've ever seen and what they actually mean. Cheers!
@9Either_Being
@9Either_Being Ай бұрын
When he said “I can fix it” i really pictured a solution being created or rebirthed.
@808estate2
@808estate2 26 күн бұрын
@28:05 Foreshadowing at it's finest, now JRE😂
@shmirie666
@shmirie666 3 ай бұрын
So if 1x1=2 than 1÷1=0. So any number multiplied by 1 is not multiplication but addition. And dividing by 1 is subtraction.
@iulia1690
@iulia1690 3 ай бұрын
1x1=1square. 1:1=1at power 0. The first îs a plane, the second a point
@aceluckgame
@aceluckgame 7 күн бұрын
​@@iulia1690except numbers are dimensionless. 1×1=1÷1=1. When you say something like: 1cm×1cm=1cm^2 but 1cm÷1cm=1.
@MilitaryDog.
@MilitaryDog. Ай бұрын
I think he’s mistaking 1 x 1 with 1 + 1. 1 item + 1 item means that you have 2 items which have been put together. 1 x 1 means that you have 1 item which grows to the amount of the other item. 1 item grows to the amount of 1 which equals 1. 10 items grow to the amount of 10 which equals 100 100 items grows to the amount of 100 which equals 10,000 With addition you have 2 items in the equation being added into eachother. 5 + 5 = 10 With multiplication you have 1 item which is growing by the other number in the equation by that many times. 5 x 5 = 25 Tho 0 is still an annoying number for me because if you have 1 item which grows by 0 times then you still have the 1 item. It only works if you say that you have 0 items which grow 1 times then you still have 0 items. Math is interesting and just because it’s old doesn’t mean that we have it all figured out. We need to keep testing out our obvious assumptions and never get complacent. There’s always something we’re missing and always something more to learn. We don’t know everything within the universe yet. ✌️😊
@percyjones8376
@percyjones8376 24 күн бұрын
Yep exactly you remember this form 3 grade? Lol this is a good experiment to watch people change basic knowledge because a person in a way over paid profession tells them too… I’m reading people argue about how he is right about 1x0 being 1. I mean you can see it everywhere these days.. Supreme Court justices not being able to say what a women is(even though she is one).. and so on and on.. it’s time for this asteroid to hit we need to start over again
@davidpettey2698
@davidpettey2698 23 күн бұрын
Just change your analogy from growing to counting and it works. 1 item that you count once is 1 1 item that you count zero times is 0
@WLVSTV
@WLVSTV 23 күн бұрын
You’re actually using a false equivalency. You are referencing an action not a mathematical sequence. If I count something 1x yes it equals once. With numbers - if you’re multiplying. The number breaks away from original positioning to amplify itself to a new number. 1x1=1 is a broken equation because the number never shifts so it’s a placeholder like the “number” 0 which isn’t a number
@bobbyknight3836
@bobbyknight3836 23 күн бұрын
@@WLVSTVI’ve been going deep on this for the last few days and that’s a perfect explanation
@fetB
@fetB 23 күн бұрын
@@WLVSTV Terrence, is that you speaking? Theres nothing broken about 1x1. Multiplication is the expression of how many multiples of a value, or item etc, exists. And 0 is a number. It's the mathematical expression of no value.
@christinecoates9449
@christinecoates9449 2 ай бұрын
The flower of life starts from a single circle at the centre of the symbol, meaning life from a single circle from creation onward
@ryancromwell4092
@ryancromwell4092 Ай бұрын
A group is more than to put several things together that are similar
@justintaylor7837
@justintaylor7837 2 ай бұрын
Mang, great to be here mang
@lachlanandrews5805
@lachlanandrews5805 20 күн бұрын
Im tha only muddafarkin sekurity up in ere mane 😂
@user-ct5de2tt4l
@user-ct5de2tt4l 6 ай бұрын
1 TIMES ANY NUMBER, IS ITSELF. pretty simple to understand. He says 1x1 fails to satisfy the term "multiply. Multiply means obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times. Obtain from (1) another that contains the fist number (1) a specified number of times (1). one 1 is 1...
@alicedoors4826
@alicedoors4826 6 ай бұрын
lol yh his problem seems to be his definition of multiply
@Leomerya12
@Leomerya12 6 ай бұрын
Then 1 times 0 is 1, based on that same reasoning. There's flaws in his logic. A better way to understand multiply is as an instance. Zero instances of One is leaves you with a total of Zero. One instance of One leaves you with a total of One. Two instances of One leaves you with a total of Two. Etc.
@leowhite9873
@leowhite9873 6 ай бұрын
🤣Its still one zero aint it ?@@Leomerya12
@rj_lab
@rj_lab 5 ай бұрын
@@Leomerya12 it is till zero based on his logic, not 1.
@RaidoKivioja
@RaidoKivioja 5 ай бұрын
@@rj_lab no its not
@francx_o
@francx_o 11 күн бұрын
I like his confidence.
@ClevelandDelaney
@ClevelandDelaney Ай бұрын
Salute🏆 Peace ✨ Power⚡ and Prosperity👑 Thanks for letting me in the club in Atlanta years ago I told you I was going to be a Music Producer and I now Have my Bachelor's in Audio Production. You have always been real and a great person Salute God 💯🎆👑 I told you thanks for doing hustle and flow when I caught you coming up the stairs at the club I had my laptop in my hand making beats if you don't remember. 🎆
@Thadopeera
@Thadopeera Ай бұрын
Those that KNOW you don’t have to TELL.. Those you have to TELL won’t LISTEN 💯
@mirrorman9784
@mirrorman9784 2 ай бұрын
Wow! Howard is very patient! 😂 Not surprised he ran away!
@ArohiVasquez
@ArohiVasquez 2 ай бұрын
He ran away?
@MrJohndolphin
@MrJohndolphin 4 күн бұрын
This dude just discovered a brand new level/reality in mathematics. If 1 x 1 = 2 then you must be seriously on another level of existence. I think this dude tripped out and came back with some unbelievable revelation, maybe from another world.
@Guumity101
@Guumity101 2 күн бұрын
Yall forget he is an actor ..this might be a character of his
@jessewilliams6459
@jessewilliams6459 22 күн бұрын
Terrence fans: "I failed math, but he tells me my teacher was wrong. That makes me feel smart."
@buythedip5300
@buythedip5300 20 күн бұрын
I was in advanced mathematics but he makes some good points. Try and think outside the box.
@TheHalusis
@TheHalusis 20 күн бұрын
@@buythedip5300 sounding like he makes a good point
@INeedsMoneys
@INeedsMoneys 20 күн бұрын
@@buythedip5300 yeah most definitely. Some people (most) are too confined by rules set up by other people a long long time ago taking it as the ultimate truth and nothing can ever change it. That's not how progress is made.
@INeedsMoneys
@INeedsMoneys 20 күн бұрын
@@buythedip5300 love the name btw. I'm always buying the dip. 💯🔥📈
@jessewilliams6459
@jessewilliams6459 20 күн бұрын
@@INeedsMoneys Not really. I'm an engineer. If something works it works. Do something with it and I'll be impressed.
@stacyjens8256
@stacyjens8256 2 ай бұрын
I would love to watch a Terrence Howard show full of educational content.
@creativekaii
@creativekaii Ай бұрын
I'd love this as well!
@anthonyricciardo
@anthonyricciardo Ай бұрын
You mean a show full of misconceptions and mistakes of concepts? Yeah, that would be entertaining. Would give me enough content to start my own KZfaq channel dedicated to explaining in simple terms where the mistake is.
@yancynunez5387
@yancynunez5387 Ай бұрын
😂😂 😂😂 people are so dumb.. so you think Einstein didn't think of why 1x1= 1 its an easy explanation. the man memorized 2 numbers in a calculator and he a genius .. let me see him do math.. with out a calculator. always talking about the same dam thing. the fact that yall dont know how 1x1=1 The reason the number stays the same is because multiplying by 1 means we have 1 copy of the number. mtf confusing adding and multiplying 😂😂 still cant wrap his head around of why having one copy of a number equals that number .. ahhhh maybe cuse you have a copy of one number bro 😂
@Duna181
@Duna181 2 ай бұрын
Is any one how i can contact him , or try call and talk for few minuts? I think i know what he is missing in his approch.
@317cmrogers
@317cmrogers 23 күн бұрын
I legit just want to sit and talk with him for like 10min. Pretty sure we can clear all this up
@kalinamasash1137
@kalinamasash1137 Ай бұрын
Thank You Terence , Greeting from Poland :)
@Nextsession271
@Nextsession271 5 ай бұрын
Much Respect to you Mr. HOWARD. I proposed this same idea to a mayoral candidate years ago. HE said he was extremely interested in my idea, and he would call me, but never called. I was even willing to donate my own personal equipment for the children's development. I've since moved out of that city. Most inner city legislation is not interested in truly helping out troubled youth. SMH
@createa.googleaccount713
@createa.googleaccount713 3 ай бұрын
YOU ARE OUR TRUE HERO!!! ❤🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🎖🏅🥇🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👏👏👏👏👏👏🙌🙌🙌💣🤜💥🤛💫🧨🎆 Soooo sorry to heat this, I hope this Dude CALLS 📞 YOU!!! AND INVITES YOU & INCLUDES YOU!!!
@anthonyricciardo
@anthonyricciardo 2 ай бұрын
Unfortunately Terrence's thought process and logic is flawed here. Its simply a mistake in the mathematical concept of multiplication. I have provided a full proof and explanation above in the comments.
@s133p3r0
@s133p3r0 Ай бұрын
@@anthonyricciardo 1 times 1 OCCURENCE. It's very simple, pretend there is a vending machine with apples in it, if you get a ticket that says 5 on it, you get to press the button on the machine 5 times till you use all the credits. If you get a ticket with 1 apple on it, how many apples do you get? 1 or 2?
@anthonyricciardo
@anthonyricciardo Ай бұрын
@@s133p3r0 not sure what you are talking about… but one ticket gets you one apple. If you have a ticket and already have an apple, you end up with 2… 1 apple from the machine and 1 apple that you started with?
@NothingTrue11
@NothingTrue11 26 күн бұрын
@@anthonyricciardoisn’t that 1+1?
@CaptainDavidNMartinLawEn-nl2qe
@CaptainDavidNMartinLawEn-nl2qe 2 ай бұрын
Sir , I wish to tell you a little of what I have found in my studies since ending my 33 year career in and upon the Sea Bering crew engineer captain owner. I was interested in Law and started down that rabbit hole as after listening to you , you did the same with math and I find the flower of life most interesting and you are a wise man sir , and dedicated to your pursuit and seem to be selfless in sharing now you said you patented your work and that is wise sir as most are selfish , I comprehend fully that we all must be to be able to help others . What I found disturbs me and last year in June I wrote 2 affidavits and had them notarized ( notary public sits higher upon the judicial chain of command than the 2 lower court justices) 1 proclamation of Emancipation of legal and legal entity upon the grounds that ownership of legal (fake contractual law , note lower case) it is secret as was with the birth certificate legal entity unknowing by the parents or guardian signing that document pledges the baby legal entity , prior th 1938 you are born Law est. Free .
@Timisme1926
@Timisme1926 Ай бұрын
As he talks about hustle and flow, describing, is white magic, it’s real, it’s truth, it’s life. If you enjoy movies, this movie is inspiring. If you aren’t inspired and if you haven’t done similar to try and get what you want out of life, you aren’t doing it correctly.
@user-ky7dn4qw3s
@user-ky7dn4qw3s 4 ай бұрын
Absolutely on point brother
@anthonyricciardo
@anthonyricciardo 2 ай бұрын
Similar to Terrence, however, his reasoning and logic are misguided. It's a fundamental error in understanding the concept of multiplication. I've detailed a complete proof and explanation in the comments above.
@user-ph9sc9dp2z
@user-ph9sc9dp2z 2 ай бұрын
Terrance is such a great guy. Loved Hustle and Flow, that movie changed my life
@drownyall
@drownyall 24 күн бұрын
How?
@KFrost-cz7uh
@KFrost-cz7uh Ай бұрын
9:57 now I’m curious at this part not about what the interview or follow up with… I want to know what the first page script said verbatim.
@robertperham3571
@robertperham3571 12 күн бұрын
"If you don't learn to lie by age 4 then you're not developing properly " says it all.
@richardzakh7209
@richardzakh7209 21 күн бұрын
guys the difference is he's trying to multiply number on number, not number on time, it's whole different system in both cases math is correct it means that second initial doesn't have time properties but number's which is quantity, while time has different properties as a whole of itself which can merge with a one, if you ate 1 apple 1 time then you ate 1 apple because time can merge of itself but if you multiply money on money then it's a different story
@conormooney5786
@conormooney5786 20 күн бұрын
He's a special kind of stupid
@indiig.
@indiig. 20 күн бұрын
That’s the realization that I came to as well, but now I’m having trouble wrapping my head around how you can multiply a unit times another unit. If I multiply 2 dollars by 3 dollars do I have $5 or $6? Is unit x unit just addition? Can I multiply 2 cats by 2 bananas?
@baassiia
@baassiia 20 күн бұрын
Yes he is folling people who are bad in math. Example from 1 grade. One boy recived 1 candy twice (1*2) and Second 1 candy once (1*1) who has more candies. His evaluation about linear math is also wrong 1m*1m is 1m2, a square. 1m*1m*1m =1m3 a cube. We have it covered. As for 4D (adding time) I am not sure what is the status currently but math sciencienst know it's there ;) You can't technicaly multiple 2banana with 3 oranges. You can do muliplocation 3*2 banana or 2*3oranges, wheres first number is muliplicator not object.
@richardzakh7209
@richardzakh7209 20 күн бұрын
@@baassiia see that's what i said, you provided me example that multiply on time with a candy, once or twice is a time while Terrence challenges multiplying object by object or action by action, but in our math second initial is just a time, it doesn't mean our math is wrong though
@baassiia
@baassiia 20 күн бұрын
@@richardzakh7209 if you insist to multiple then you can do banan =x, strawberry =y. 3x*2y = 6xy which is nor banana nor strawberry just fruit salad. Overall usfullness of that is real life is minimal, that doesn't mean it not exist in math. I gave you other example with metric system when usfullness is obvious 2mx2m = 4m2, a square.
@Kamza8eight
@Kamza8eight 3 ай бұрын
Terrence Howard 🙌🏼🔥 keep unveiling the True Nature of existence
@syndon7052
@syndon7052 3 ай бұрын
You betta whoop that Trick! xD
@user-db2gz9fc9d
@user-db2gz9fc9d 3 ай бұрын
I have cracked all secrets, Da vinci, Nikolas Tesla, Terrence Howards (Flower of Life) ect.
@trustyWeedGuy
@trustyWeedGuy 2 ай бұрын
​@@user-db2gz9fc9dExpound
@anthoneeduke3482
@anthoneeduke3482 2 ай бұрын
@@user-db2gz9fc9dalso if u have crack my brain open with the knowledge
@anthoneeduke3482
@anthoneeduke3482 2 ай бұрын
@@user-db2gz9fc9dur carbon jus like me 666 now where we go out from this body is different but u are still in it besides sleeping unless this is a energy that’s isn’t yours originally
@henrybraxton217
@henrybraxton217 2 ай бұрын
Every movie Hes in He them my favorites but I love to hear him talk Physics, Math and Reason 😱🤯 Am I Crazy or is the Calculator Broke? 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@silencedogood5631
@silencedogood5631 Күн бұрын
He’s still in character from Radio.
@joeveevo
@joeveevo Ай бұрын
Here’s them problem in his logic imo. In much simpler terms than anyone else I’ve seen comment. The square root of 2 is 1.4etc. Meaning if you take 1.4etc and add .4etc of 1.4etc to 1.4etc you will get 2. Now when you cube 1.4etc, first you are taking 1.4etc and multiplying it by 1.4etc like I did before equaling 2 and then multiplying by 1.4etc again. Making the operation 2x1.4etc giving you 2.8etc now when you do what he told the other person to do you are simply multiplying 1.4etc x2 which is the exact operation you are performing in the set of operations he told the first person to do. Meaning he told them to do the exact same thing but made it convoluted enough that they didn’t realize they were performing the exact same operations and leaving them baffled as if they witnessed some flaw in basic mathematics. Someone who believes he is right please enlighten me.
@andromedadelux
@andromedadelux Ай бұрын
That explanation as to why it is flawed was horrible but. What he explained with the 2 loop can actually be done with every number as long as you divide by the original number itself. Square root of 2 = X number. Take X number and Cube it. Then divide by 2 and you'll get X number. Then cube it and you get a repeat etc. Square root of 5 = X number. Take that number and Cube it. Then divide by 5 and you'll get X number. Then cube and you get a repeat etc. ^ you can do it with every number. The loop is in the division. You can't create the "loop" if you took Square root of 5 = X number. Take that number and Cube it. Then divide by 2 and you'll get X number. Then cube it and you won't get a loop at all because you didn't use the same number to divide. He leaves out this kind of experimentation and the reasoning is selective if you only use 2 to divide without considering that any other number used if repeated in the same way will just create repetition.... The only thing I've heard him be accurate on is the explanation of zero in physics for energy. Which obviously cannot exist within the calculation of any of those equations because the presence of energy removes the possibility of zero in the first place. Which runs into complications with information and the whole black hole thing initially because the old ideation of the black hole didn't consider energy in a proper way where some idiot decided to give a black hole properties that don't exist. Even when its 1000% obvious that anything going into a black hole just gets shot out the other side like....who wasn't paying attention to the actual images and thought it just blanked out? Wtf were they smoking....he states theres a problem with the loop but there really isn't cause you're just literally making the loop yourself with selection of the numbers involved. He plays a fun numbers game but unless I'm missing something I don't see any significance in looping the numbers yourself.
@macbird-lt8de
@macbird-lt8de Ай бұрын
@@andromedadelux the part where he said "x^3=2x=x+x" may have x^(1/2) as the only solution. Not that it means anything lol, but it's a cute puzzle to ask somebody to solve for x.
@macbird-lt8de
@macbird-lt8de Ай бұрын
lol he calls it "an unnatural equation and a mathematical fallacy". what a guy.
@GamblingDogs-go7lu
@GamblingDogs-go7lu Ай бұрын
a square root of a number is a number that when it multiple itself it gives us the original number ... example the square root of 4 is 2 , because 2x2 is 4 .... again the square root of 9 is 3 , because 3x3=9 ... so the square root of 2 , is 1.41421356237 meaning 1.41421356237x 1.41421356237 =2
@user-ej7be9mm7s
@user-ej7be9mm7s Ай бұрын
He’s right multiply means to increase point blank period.
@kellyjackson4973
@kellyjackson4973 6 ай бұрын
Hustle and flow is my favorite movie
@billycake5830
@billycake5830 22 күн бұрын
I'm sorry to hear that
@Timisme1926
@Timisme1926 Ай бұрын
The story about Hotel Chateau Mon Mon, is such a Cold pimping life!! Trick that was just, absolutely the funniest story I’ve ever heard!!
@Steel_here
@Steel_here Күн бұрын
The word salad here can spew is egregious
@joshuaanoruo973
@joshuaanoruo973 20 күн бұрын
x³ = 2x x³ - 2x = 0 x(x² - 2) = 0 x = 0 and x² - 2 = 0 x² = 2 x = ±1.414 Makes sense. This is why kids should pay attention in school
@mazera_sushi
@mazera_sushi 21 күн бұрын
Please never change Terrence i appreciate you challenging math. We should question everything doesnt make you crazy just means we want more
@PanikedReactions
@PanikedReactions 20 күн бұрын
You’re right, everything around us isn’t evidence that he’s full of shit. Delusional
@Sir-.-
@Sir-.- 2 ай бұрын
Very enlightening 😊
@oneelrockwell79
@oneelrockwell79 25 күн бұрын
We should question everything in this society at this point.
@fafunvideography
@fafunvideography 4 ай бұрын
That's so funny, 1x1, i used to look at that when learning math, and over the years, my gut was like, what?! Lol
@dominicellis1867
@dominicellis1867 4 ай бұрын
If 1*1 = 2, then 1/1 doesn’t equal 1 and all of algebra collapses. Without identity elements we can’t stay within the field of real numbers and nothing makes sense. Super symmetry does not exist, it’s a promise made by string theory. What he’s talking about is a perfect engine with no entropy, it’s not impossible but statistically improbable to the greatest degree. An engine that looses no energy to heat or sound would theoretically be able to fly perfectly tangentially so that all of the subsequent energy could be harnessed for the landing at the destination. That is genius but highly improbable.
@trustyWeedGuy
@trustyWeedGuy 2 ай бұрын
​@@dominicellis1867but what if?
@VesicaChloeAstrology
@VesicaChloeAstrology Ай бұрын
fr
@LambertBowden56
@LambertBowden56 Ай бұрын
​@@trustyWeedGuy There is no "what if" here... it's just nonsense. End of story.
@trustyWeedGuy
@trustyWeedGuy Ай бұрын
@@LambertBowden56 check out his drone challenge and tell me it's still bullshit xdd Only 4 engineers in the world solved it. You have a 2 hours podcast in his channel with the dudes showing their Lynchpin drones, capable of tangential flight. Terrence Howard Project
@jamescarver5876
@jamescarver5876 23 күн бұрын
A square that’s 1 unit by 1 unit gives an area of one square unit . If I hand someone one dollar, one time, they’re up one dollar. If I overlap one horizontal line with one vertical line, they intersect once. If I do 11x11 I get a number ending in one for some reason. If I fill up a checkerboard with one row and one column, one square is filled up. If I multiply any two odd numbers together, the product is always odd. Seems to work in every application. But 1x1=2 because of energy or something
@JackTheMimic
@JackTheMimic 22 күн бұрын
Multiplication is the question: How many objects is a single object in groups of itself what number of times? How many apples are 4 groups of 5 apples? 20, right? How many apples are 1 group of 1 apples? Linguistically, that question doesn't make any sense. It's either undefined or zero GROUPS of apples. Terrance seems to just take the word group to mean more than one object. So the minimum for objects within a group is 2. He also makes the point that only 1 and 0 have heuristics that are not imperical, just dogmatic. Multiply something by 1, and it equals itself. Multiply something by 0, and it equals 0. Why do you know from A x B = B That A equals 1? Why, imperically, not dogmatically? Why do you know from A x B = A That A equals 0? How do you know that besides the dogmatic repetition, that zero times anything equals zero? Why can't you do that with ANY other number? These are the crazy questions that everyone just laughs off instead of working through imperically.
@humanbean3
@humanbean3 22 күн бұрын
@@JackTheMimic say what
@JackTheMimic
@JackTheMimic 22 күн бұрын
@@humanbean3 I don't know if you literally didn't read it, or you don't understand what is written there. Lol
@humanbean3
@humanbean3 21 күн бұрын
@@JackTheMimic I can't understand the point you're making. I'm not smart but I can usually understand stuff If I try hard enough. I know 0 times of something is 0 empirically and dogmatically. I know 1 times of something is that something empirically and dogmatically. I kind of understand not liking the word "multiply" because it has a different definition when not used in math context though.
@nosajc0okies364
@nosajc0okies364 21 күн бұрын
@@humanbean3 @humanbean3 When you express 1 x 1 = 1 you are saying 1 group of 1. But grouping can't occur this way it's singular, so the expression becomes void through that context. 1=1 not 1x1=1. The equation implies that there is more then one, otherwise we wouldn't get 1x1=1 or 1=1 it would just be 1. They made a mistake putting 0 or x at the base of the multiplication table, because it should just be represented as 1, there should never be a 1x1. Why have 0 if nothing exists in the first place, you got a group of nothing so how dumb were we to group nothingness and then calculate everything off nothing, so 256 of what couldve been multiplied by 0 (representing the groups) is equal to 0. Or 256 groups full of nothing, 0 = 0. What? Then to go 1x1=1, 1 is 1, its not 1 is 1 equals 1. This is why he gets you to "square root" 2 and and cube the result (not square it). 1Group x 1Thing = 1thing doesn't make sense, why group 1 thing. How did you isolate 1 thing into 1 group and ignore what you isolated it from.
@SimonLandryMusic
@SimonLandryMusic 13 күн бұрын
What kind of calendar does he use?
@diesalwater1923
@diesalwater1923 Ай бұрын
0 cannot exist. 0 represents the void. In nature there is no void. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
@Player-gx1eo
@Player-gx1eo Ай бұрын
Matter is + antimatter is -, if matter and antimatter collide +1-1=0, so yea 0 exist. Also if 0 don't exist than - wouldn't exist, which is wrong
@fsacchau
@fsacchau 18 күн бұрын
I'm not here to offend anyone, including Mr. Terrence Howard. Perhaps I can offer an explanation that may clear up this "1x1” question. I think that whether it be +, - , *, or /, the units matter. In the case of multiplying, we often ignore the units because we sort of understood what the implied units are. For example, if 1 pound of grapes costs 1 dollar, and you purchased 1 pound, then the equation is [1 pound * 1 dollar/pound = 1 dollar]. The unit 'pound' cancels, and you're left with the answer 1 dollar. That makes sense because you purchased 1 pound of grapes, and so the cost should be 1 dollar. In the day-to-day application, this is often how we use multiplication. We drop the units because they are implied. In the case of a square (with length & width of 1 meter), the area is 1 meter x 1 meter = 1 meter^2. Note how you also multiply the units (I.e., m x m = m^2). If you have a rectangle with sides of 1/2 meter and 2 meters, then the area is also 1 meter^2 [1/2 meter x 2 meters]. This makes sense because if you take the area from a square (1 m x 1 m) and cut it in the middle and put them side by side, it would yield the same area of a rectangle (1/2 m x 2 m = 1 m^2). Math is just a framework like a language but with very strict rules. We have an operation where 1 "operation" 1 = 2. That operation is addition with '+' symbol. If we want to change the meaning of the operation 'x' to addition, then 1 x 1 = 2. Note that even with addition, one should be mindful of the units. For example, 1 dollar + 10 cents, we should convert 1 dollar to 100 cents or 10 cents to 0.1 dollar before adding. Therefore, 1 dollar + 10 cents can be written as 100 cents + 10 cents = 110 cents or 1 dollar + 0.1 dollar = 1.1 dollars. While Mr. Howard is correct that 1 penny x 1 penny is not 1 penny, he is not correct in claiming that it is 2 pennies. 1 penny x 1 penny = 1 penny^2 (which is not the same as 2 pennies). Penny^2 has no meaning to us.
@kharonthecreator
@kharonthecreator 18 күн бұрын
balance the equation of (1x1=1) you will have (1=0). does 1 equal 0?
@skyisthelimitreadyornotfor2
@skyisthelimitreadyornotfor2 18 күн бұрын
Howard should have made that distinction. 1 penny x 1 penny is 2 pennies, but 1 penny x 1 is just 1 penny.
@Xx1PWNY1xX
@Xx1PWNY1xX 17 күн бұрын
​@kharonthecreator balance it then? Divide each side by 1. 1=1 😊
@osaskeys7316
@osaskeys7316 17 күн бұрын
Please, can you explain how your rectangle and square analogy leads to 1×1=2, I understand the square and rectangle analogy, but I've failed to still see how it leads to that conclusion, so please, can you just explain it one more time, but with simpler words, so I can easily understand. I've asked Chatgpt to explain, but it's not just giving me what I need, just kept in beating round the bush.
@fsacchau
@fsacchau 17 күн бұрын
@@osaskeys7316 Hi Osaskeys, so the area of a rectangle with sides of 1/2 m and 2 m equals 1 m^2. The area of a square with sides of 1 m and 1 m also equals 1 m^2. If you take a square and cut it in the middle and place the two pieces side by side, it will look exactly like the rectangle with sides 1/2 m and 2 m. This means that the area of the square equals the area of the rectangle. We know that (1/2) x 2 = 1 (which is the rectangle). Since the area of the square is exactly the same as the rectangle, it means the square also has area of 1. I was trying to prove that 1 x 1 = 1. I hope this helps answer your question.
@jeremygraves7982
@jeremygraves7982 4 ай бұрын
Terrence unironically seems like a fun guy to be around
@Christian_Ada1
@Christian_Ada1 3 ай бұрын
Please stop saying unironically It’s overused because if the internet
@kevenbates4313
@kevenbates4313 2 ай бұрын
Very true, I would love to have a few hours to privately talk with him about physics and ideas about the universe, he is a very creative thinker.
@bradleyhayman2682
@bradleyhayman2682 Ай бұрын
If you like hanging out at the funny farm
@s133p3r0
@s133p3r0 Ай бұрын
@@kevenbates4313 Just talk to a schizophrenic vagrant, it will make about as much sense.
@_Majunior
@_Majunior 24 күн бұрын
​@@Christian_Ada1it's the same sentence without the use of it. I'm so tired of seeing it
@jeroen5736
@jeroen5736 9 күн бұрын
So many folks here and nobody seem to be able to explain basic multiplying so anyone can understand . most people are handling ego and think they are showing intelligence by saying something basically stupid . i did something similar, i was like ye sure lets go ahead and see if Terrence Howard was right. Did most people understand what he said ? i say no . so many different folks other approaches and view, i enjoyed this part . thanks everyone ! question: what does multiplying mean? we all learned basic math like : 1x1 1x2 1x3 1x4 1x5 1x6 1x7 1x8 1x9 1x10 2x1 2x2 2x3 etc. using words. one times one is one , one time two is two, two times two is four . It is a honest question or remark to say one times one is not multiplying or is it ? in real life one dollar or whatever coin , why would you even call it multiplying it is just one coin , maybe in the mind people think i have one time one . does it even matter , is it a big deal? i say NO! stay healthy and enjoy the day!!
@AlixBrignol
@AlixBrignol 19 күн бұрын
I love you bro! No fear
@michaelm3363
@michaelm3363 2 ай бұрын
1 group of 1 apple gives… 1 apple in total. I think. Let me just check my work here. Oh yep, still equals 1 😂
@maamenotjahere7974
@maamenotjahere7974 Ай бұрын
1X1=1 no argument
@AP_Designs
@AP_Designs Ай бұрын
Well in our current way of thinking it does.. what he's suggesting though is 1 group of 1 apples = 1 group of 1 apples = 2 separate things = 1 group + 1 apple. You don't now have 0 groups of 1 apples or 1 group of 0 apples. The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - only converted from one form of energy to another. With that way of understanding, it makes sense.
@zainodeenisaacs3158
@zainodeenisaacs3158 Ай бұрын
I might not be a mathematician... but 1X1[will always][= 1. I thing his not understanding the language of math. if I had to solve (1X3= or 3X1), I would say 1+1+1= or 3 =, if this math looks wrong to you, then WOO to you. No disrespect To Terrence Howard, but stick to acting.
@UraStr
@UraStr Ай бұрын
@@AP_Designs shrooms or acid?
@LetsTalkAboutGodNow
@LetsTalkAboutGodNow Ай бұрын
If you give a person 1 apple they could share and grow more with the seeds......or a person could be selfish and eat the apple and waste the seeds, then yeah one =one.....or one could equal a lot to one person.... There's a story in the bible about Talents......check it out...... Jesus feed thousands with 5 loaves of bread and 2 fish....😂😂😂sometimes its not what you got but what ro do with it...... KATT Williams been on tour 19 yrs and pays well self owned business and supports other comedians....that One man multiplied his Talent ❤❤❤
@null_s3t
@null_s3t 22 күн бұрын
Alternate title: Terrence Howard needs to go back to elementary school.
@erraticentertainment
@erraticentertainment 20 күн бұрын
You lack the iq to grasp this concept and that's fine lil bro
@jvjjjvvv9157
@jvjjjvvv9157 10 күн бұрын
The reaction to his words is probably even more worrying. Not only a lot of people seem to completely lack the basic common sense required to suspect that an actor with no math training or education didn't just prove all physicists and mathematicians in the world wrong, but they can't even figure out that he's wrong when he claims that 1x1=2. I mean, I'm sorry, but I almost can't imagine lower bars than understanding that this guy is full of crap and he doesn't make any sense, and yet lots of people still don't clear that bar.
@aceluckgame
@aceluckgame 4 күн бұрын
​@@erraticentertainmentnah terrence is wrong. 1×1=0!
@maniphaces
@maniphaces Ай бұрын
I pretty much dig everything my dude says, and I really respect and am inspired by everything he is doing- however my perspective on the whole 1x0 thing [because no one asked for it;] - I learned multiplications by teaching myself that it asks a question: "what's inside ___ groups of some number"? You might have been taught this way also. So, it obviously goes like this 2X3 = 2 groups of 3 (of something) = 6 things total in these groups. 1x1 = 1 group of 1 (something). getting to the point 1x0 = 1 group of nothing means no group- so yeah it sounds like a trick question so we rewrite it to sound more logical; 0x1 = 0 groups of 1 (aka what's inside of zero groups of 1) = still sounding like a trick question but it still tells you that basically you already know that there is either "nothing there" [but since "nothing" doesn't exist] or its "saying you did not create a group". Basically, it's a question that should not be asked. Or it's a rhetorical question at best. But the world likes to see complete patterns "everything must be included" so 0x1 must be included in the times table. But why ask the question? It's like asking "if I stand still- how fast did I run- or how far did I go"? Again "nothing" doesn't exist. Nothing would be an oxymoron to the concept of existence itself. 0 is basically no more than a place holder for mental constructs - or as mentioned before, it represents the absence of action/creation/manifestation; "you created 0 groups of one or 1 group of 0". It's still a statement being made, equivalent to "at the start of the timer til the end, you did not take any action". zero represents everything that was not done. Which in the case it's almost a synonym for infinity; because there will always be an infinite number of things that does not happen. If at the fork in the road, you go left, well you did not go right. Thus, "not going right" is represented as 0
@Bxnjamin
@Bxnjamin Ай бұрын
i like to think in new ways especially when trying to understand reality, and as mad as this all sounds it has made me think. (dont read this high) When thinking of multiplication as grouping, I'm aware that the equation of 1 apple multiplied by 1 is 1(1(apple)) , which in reality is not actually just 1 apple.. In this case the apple is a subject (of which there is 1) and the other 1 is a mathematical concept just as much as 0 and infinity.. it is separate to the 1 apple, or subject. So now when contrarily thinking about 1 apple multiplied by 1 apple - not 1 group of 1 apple - i can imagine how these two circumstances are completely separate cases in terms of reality/energy. increasing 1 apple by 1 apple shouldn't essentially remove the energy of either apple, and this is different to having 1 set of 1 apple. Our actual concept of 1 multiplied by itself and not an external subject should then also create a greater version of itself. Visually, 2 of something expanding by 2 of themselves would appear as 4 of those things together, 3 by 3 would appear as 9, and 1 expanding by 1 would appear as 2 (like if my iphone increased by one of itself it would look like a malformed double iphone). If so could the true 0 multiplied by the true 0 possibly equal 1, or in less mathematical terms "something"? Especially as its apparent that our concept of 0 is equally as small and large as infinity. What does this kind of unimaginable reaction cause outside of our comprehension? I believe that mathematics is our minds true language, and terminology can cause a lot of confusion. I think there's a fundamental difference between thinking of multiplication as creating baskets/groups, and thinking of multiplication as accumulation - or increasing - of the self/subject. There are things science/religion may never be able to explain - like how in our reality at some point something had to come from nothing - So i'm open to exploring possibilities and new ways of thinking like this that could help to explain these unknowns in our understanding. Thanks for reading my ted talks, I could be crazy or a genius.
@michaelmiller4938
@michaelmiller4938 25 күн бұрын
This is the most intelligent failure of grade school math ever espoused.
@arctyler2245
@arctyler2245 22 күн бұрын
Please do tell
@mattbeckley9483
@mattbeckley9483 10 сағат бұрын
​@@arctyler2245if I receive 1 dollar for 1 day how many dollars do I have?
@kreasenchetty
@kreasenchetty 2 ай бұрын
Terence Howard defination of multiplication: " To make more..." Terrance Howard proof of a fundamentally flawed mathematical system and the basis of Terrology: "Cool calculator trick to wow your friends"
@lokanoda
@lokanoda 2 ай бұрын
Yeah, he's stuck up in his own ass
@miikavihersaari3104
@miikavihersaari3104 24 күн бұрын
It's not even a cool calculator trick, but a simple equation: x^3 = 2x, div both sides by x: x^2 = 2, take square root: x = sqrt(2) So in order for cubing x to be the same as multiplying x by two, x must be the square root of two. EDIT: To be precise, the equation has three solutions: x = sqrt(2) x = -sqrt(2) x = 0
@thumuslol
@thumuslol 23 күн бұрын
If anyone is reading this and maybe be a bit confused by math notation, that totally normal… math difficult for many people, you can think of x^3 as 3 x’s being multiplied by eachother so x times x times x which is commonly represented as (x*x*x) using the astrix to represent multiplication. Since we dont know the value if x since it is a variable, you cannot divide it by two and reduce it to (x*x), that would only work if the value of x was 2. Dont let this terrence moron make you an idiot too…
@miikavihersaari3104
@miikavihersaari3104 23 күн бұрын
@@thumuslol No one's dividing x^3 by 2 to get x^2.
@diji5071
@diji5071 23 күн бұрын
​@@miikavihersaari3104consumption = time ²
@pick3boxhitstrategy
@pick3boxhitstrategy 3 ай бұрын
#1x1=2 Thank you, Terrence Howard.
@sarachigod
@sarachigod 2 ай бұрын
😂🥇
@alexanderstromer5106
@alexanderstromer5106 26 күн бұрын
As for "action times an action" at 24:00 Don't get scammed: fAction x fAction is not a reaction, which is complete nonsense. Multiplication is very simply, it is a "counter!" of fAction What Terrence potentially refers to is exponential fAction, which is in his case fAction^2; or if you have different actions fAction1 x fAction2
@Samuel-gc6js
@Samuel-gc6js 24 күн бұрын
Basically the multiplication table should start with 1×2
@PaxRT87
@PaxRT87 23 күн бұрын
No. 1 and zero are the MOST fundamental concepts to understanding reality. Terrance is lost, I'm afraid.
@undercoverinsomniac5179
@undercoverinsomniac5179 23 күн бұрын
The man said 1x1=2. That clearly defies logic. It’s as illogical as saying 1=2. The man thinks he discovered a new paradigm and people are cheering him on sadly
@imbrianbreon
@imbrianbreon 22 күн бұрын
@@undercoverinsomniac5179 if we are to understand that 9/3 = 3 then 3x3=9 correct? So if 1/0=0 then 0x0=1? Do you understand now?
@luckyLaserface
@luckyLaserface 22 күн бұрын
@@imbrianbreon Pls type 1/0 in your calculater and after that go to school again.
@adriendangelo8258
@adriendangelo8258 22 күн бұрын
​@@imbrianbreon1/0 is undefined. Same with 0/1. Zero is a special case and doesn't act like other numbers
Terrence Howard | Full Address and Q&A | Oxford Union
52:09
OxfordUnion
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
They RUINED Everything! 😢
00:31
Carter Sharer
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
Omega Boy Past 3 #funny #viral #comedy
00:22
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
When someone reclines their seat ✈️
00:21
Adam W
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
This Guy Just Proved All Our Math is Wrong
14:41
penguinz0
Рет қаралды 4,8 МЛН
Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains The Three-Body Problem
11:45
StarTalk
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Best of 2023: Terrence Howard Interview | Chris Vernon Show
36:09
Grind City Media
Рет қаралды 19 М.
1 X 1= 2: An Exploration of the Nature of the Square Root of 2 by Terrence Howard
12:08
Terrence Howard's Lynchpin Competition: Final Judgement and Results
1:20:50
The Lynchpin Project
Рет қаралды 97 М.
Terrence Howard Is Insane From Professor Dave - Luke Reacts
28:23
Luke Stephens LIVE
Рет қаралды 82 М.
Kobe Bryant Tells Alex Rodriguez How Shaq Ruined His 40 Point Streak
6:27
The Corp With A-Rod and Big Cat
Рет қаралды 794 М.
HEIGHT KICK CHALLENGE!!😱
0:16
Joris
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Regular Season vs. PLAYOFFS part 2 #pavelbarber
0:14
Pavel Barber
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
Zorlu Şut Challenge
0:55
Kadim Futbol
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
who wins the extreme balloon pop race ?
1:00
OSS Entertainment Team
Рет қаралды 127 МЛН
Роналду не человек и вот почему 😎
0:39
КИК Шорт!
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН