So if you don’t have a red letter edition it is somehow not as good? Did Jesus speak with red words?

John Connors 111 amen!

@@Nick-wn1xw Not at all! But some people just like the Red-letter edition! It doesn't make any difference, Red-letter or not! Hope this helps!

@@sirhood1848 That's not what the OP stated though. You of course are correct in what you said.

@@Nick-wn1xw good grief Batman.... You are truly missing the point..

kjv is the pure word of God✝️

God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.

​@@Netgazum It's in ENGLISH not Chinese and it's the inspired Word IN ENGLISH so your comment is pointless. God's Word can be in any language,as long it doesn't distort the original Hebrew and Greek meaning and intent and make it say something completely different. And English is the main spoken language throughout the world.

@@spirit-walkerwaters4521 According to the King James in Deuteronomy 32:8 some how the nations of the world were split up according to the number of the sons of Israel,. That was before there was an Israel so how could they be split according to their number? Seems like a bad translation and it is, good thing we had the older dead sea scrolls to reference and correct the corruption with the right translation, Sons of God. Certainly the King Jamess is not inspired why would you make such a claim? It's an ok translation.

@@Netgazum That's completely false. Genesis 35:10 shows the truth “And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel.” The Dead Sea Scrolls are filled with lies and that's because they were forged, and at a later date than the ORIGINAL OLD TESTIMENT HEBREW BIBLE

@@spirit-walkerwaters4521 That is factually incorrect. Sorry but the dead sea scrolls are much older than the Hebrew masoritic texts used for the King James and no one disputes that do your research.You are not arguing any sense and as it's written in the KJV those verses make no sense. So now that the truth has been established do not lie anymore about the source material for the KJV, if you do you are just a lier.

Same here. I don't agree with the modern versions, they lower the meanings and the next thing you know, they'll have the not so serious context, nothing to worry about. It's causing them to err rather than be prepared to the Spiritual Warfare.

Don't force people read KJV only!!

you did no such thing. The KJV and other translations do NOT say different things unless of course you are too dumb to be able to read the same thing in different translations and understand it. Jesus didn't speak in KJV english. He didn't even speak in English at all which is probably news to you.

@@tdickensheets No one is forcing anyone to read the word of God. Pointing out the errors that are numerous in modern translations is safe and needed.

@@rosaliebent4833 You are using weak arguments while you try to defend the modern translations. Let me help... You need help... You said: "you did no such thing." Response: This is where you started, so this is where I will start. 1. How do you know? 2. Can you prove that he "did no such thing."? No. You can't. Now, can I prove that the modern translations do say totally different things? Yes. Acts 8:37 in the modern English translations: ....... Omitted **In the modern translations they actually go from Acts 8:38 to Acts 8:38 The modern translators can't even count!** Acts 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. **If you would like to know *WHY* the "Church of Christ" (cult) translator wanted that verse taken out of the text I am willing to show you why.** I John 5:7 in the modern English translations: 1Jn 5:7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (Revised version) 1Jn 5:7 There are three witnesses: (Good News Bible) 1Jn 5:7 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is the truth. (American Standard version) 1Jn 5:7 For there are three that testify: (New American Standard version) I John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. *The King James Bible* (God's pure preserved word: in English for English speaking people) You will notice in the modern versions we see that 2 *MAJOR* Bible doctrines are changed, attacked, weakened and removed: A. The Trinity. B. The Deity of Jesus Christ. I can give you numerous translation errors that are found in modern translations. The modern versions weaken *MAJOR* Bible doctrines. You said: "The KJV and other translations do NOT say different things unless of course you are too dumb to be able to read the same thing in different translations and understand it." Response: That is an emotional response. Those kinds of responses are due to weak faith. The word of God will strengthen your faith in God & God's word. Romans 10:17 King James Bible. You said: "Jesus didn't speak in KJV english. He didn't even speak in English at all which is probably news to you." Response: That is irrelevant and silly at the same time. Jesus poke in Hebrew, was recorded in Greek and the word of God was translated into English. Think about this... *NOTHING* was lost! The King James Bible is the pure translation of the Hebrew (Masoretic Text) and the Greek (Textus Receptus) Your anger makes you attack instead of having a civil discussion.

They understand it perfectly they hate what it says plain and simple

I find the KJV to be very succinct and eloquent at the same time. Other versions just don't portray the majesty.

I have been willfully reading the King James Bible since I was 12. I find the language, poetry and tone of the King James text to be, by far and wide, superior not only to any modern Bibles, but basically all modern American English. Because of my fascination with the King’s English, when I was in 10th grade and we got into the Tragedy of Julias Caesar and Romeo & Juliet, I was even able to correct my English teacher’s pronunciation of the words and their meanings.

Well, the letters are in modern english without the f mean a s and so on.. Its quite understandable, and some of the words that I found that I didn't know were answered in the context.. some of them if you keep reading will answer it self.. and seriously.. you learn new words in school and people have no problem look it up.. Also we dont' rewrite hymns or shakespare.. so.. .we should have more enthusium to read the Bible and study from it... sometimes taking the time to slow down, learn is a good thing. God bless

I am going to another note... scientists use latin when creating name for things...

Garbage. SInce 'modern version circles' is basically the entire church, you don't seem to know much about this topic. BTW Gods preserved words were in HEBREW and GREEK so unless you are a scholar in these languages, you are NOT reading 'preserved words' but rather a translation thereof.

I am going to add.. scientits also dont' use modern language.. they use latin to name things because it can't change.@@rosaliebent4833

God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.

Amen I was just accused of being in a cult and being demonic. All because I prefer the KJV for it's accuracy and the fruits that came from it.

rlunnerstall. I say partially. If you research where the modern translations come from you'll understand. What's worse is that almost every pastor in America is against the KJV. It's actually really sad and disheartening to hear from your own pastor(s) that the KJV has "mistakes" in it or that the verse in my Bible was put in by some random person who grab a hold of the manuscript (and yes this IS being taught today). For example, "Christian" schools are teaching that in 1 John 5:7 that the three heavenly witnesses the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit is a forgery when the early church fathers quote this exact verse which predate their manuscripts! The sad part of it is that the argument that they make is the same as the Jehovah witness' argument. Check out their founder's quote in his book: “The only text in Scripture which was ever claimed to prove, or affirm, that the Father, Son and Spirit are one, is a portion of 1 John 5:7, 8. This appears only in Manuscripts written since the fifth century, and is acknowledged by all Trinitarians to be a “forgery.” So undisputable is this, that the translators of the “Revised Version” recently published, omit the clause without note or comment, though those Revisors [sic] were themselves believers in Trinity.” Excerpt From: David W. Daniels. “Can You Trust Just One Bible?.” But, I know the truth, I know where my Bible comes and the ones who wrote it. I hold up the KJV/Valera 1602 Purificada high!

I've heard pastor preach he can see Jesus in ALL the versions; a number in his congregation used the Message.

Amen

@@Obediah002 Wow. The MSG is not even a translation! it shouldn't be allowed to have such a title... I'll admit I picked up a copy from the Goodwill for a buck but it's only for curiosity's sake. It's not a translation but a paraphrase

We would be doing good in our searching of Him out in His word by looking back to the language the KJV was translated from not looking for an easier read or comparing multiple versions to see what you can glean rom them all, which is really kinda nonsensical.

O the KJPCE, yes that's the book for me. I stand alone on the word of God, the KJPCE!

Unless you are Catholic, in which case you have a non-KJV Bible that is several books longer thsn the KJV. Or an Eastern Orthodox Christian, in which case you have another non-KJV Bible that is several books longer than even the Catholic one.

@@Dreamerwild Or unless you are a JW, in which case you also have a corrupt perversion of man's word, not God's word! Just saying! I used to be JW! Thank God, I know the truth now, and I'm out for GOOD!

@@sirhood1848 D C Tommy is weak...if he is even saved. Pray for him

How old are you? 90+? modern translations are BETTER which is why we use them.

Don't force people read KJV only!!

@@tdickensheets No one is forcing anyone to read the King James Bible.... We are just pointing out the errors of your modern versions.... Your hypocrisy is noted...

@@jimd9339 Do we have freedom in USA read other Bible versions??

Yes, though I don't want to reocmmend someone read a Bible with condtrictions and corrupted doctrine. Yes, can get someone salvation but its a trjoan horse.@@tdickensheets

Amen.

Curt Christensen, wow, what a compelling argument.

Negative.

James Dare because I don’t agree the the kjv is the one and only translation. Ok. Lol

@@defendingthefaith.7889 I don't agree with your disagreement....

@@henrylaurel1188 really? Yes. Christ is my main anchor. But as far as Bibles go, its KJV. Better?

But I'll

Oh dear

One question you need to ask is what did the word "intermeddeleth" mean and do we still use it today? for if we don't use the word anymore, then the meaning of that word might be lost to some (or most) people. Another is what does the hebrew say, for even if you don't respect the Hebrew, it still can explain why other bibles say what they say on account of some (or most) of them are at the very least trying to follow the Hebrew here.

If the kjv sounds beautiful to you, it's because the translators made it that way on purpose. Sometimes this resulted in archaic or more latinate words cause those sounded nice back then. It seems no English bible before the kjv had "intermeddeleth" there in proverbs 18 : 1, so you could have an issue with all of these too if you wanted : Wycliffe(i) 1 He that wole go a wei fro a frend, sekith occasiouns; in al tyme he schal be dispisable. Coverdale(i) 1 Who so hath pleasure to sowe discorde, piketh a quarell in euery thinge. MSTC(i) 1 He accompanieth himself with all steadfast and healthsome doctrine, that hath a desire to it and is sequestered from company. Matthew(i) 1 Who so hath pleasure to sow dyscorde, pyketh a quarel in euery thyng. Great(i) 1 He accompanieth hym selfe with all steadfast & helth some doctryne, that hath a feruent desyre to it and is sequestrate from companye. Geneva(i) 1 For the desire thereof hee will separate himselfe to seeke it, and occupie himselfe in all wisdome. Bishops(i) 1 Who so hath an earnest desire [to wysdome] he will sequester him selfe to seeke it, and occupie him selfe in all stedfastnesse & sounde doctrine

THE OBJECTIONS HERE are breathtaking and always the same-old same-old; IN REPLY . . . Get a dictionary and learn something new.

It’s more fluid?! God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow.

@@WalkAndTalkChannell read again, I never said god changes, I said the Bible does

@@maximilian6830 the Bible is Gods word. If Gods word changes meaning God changes. They are related to each other

@@WalkAndTalkChannell God is not limited to a book

@@maximilian6830 shows that you don’t have a standard to lean on.

What's sad in all the wrangling over what version of the bible one reads is that far more important issues get lost in all the arguments. Is Jesus going to ask what version of the bible l read? Or is he going to ask if l obeyed and loved him and my brothers and sisters? That command doesn't change from one translation to the next. This "You must read this version!!" reminds me of Paul saying "Love does not insist on its own way" or "Love does not seek its own," depending upon what translation one uses. I have family members in Christ who use KJV, NIV, RSV, NRSV, ESV, NASB, NLT, NKJV, etc.Should l disown them because we use different translations? "I can't fellowship with you. You use the NASB. That's heresy." The devil has a field day dividing believers over such petty things. Straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel. Jesus said we must be born anew (John 3:3 and 7). I'm far more concerned about my spiritual character and that of those whom l interact with than what version of God's word they regularly use. What's more important in God's sight, reading a "right" translation or living a righteous life? It's not about having the "winning, superior" translation. It's about how each person lives in the light of Christ and submission to Jesus as Lord. We have persecuted brothers and sisters in many countries throughout the world where the bible is outlawed. Bibles have to be smuggled to them at great risk. Do you think they care what version of the bible they're receiving? "You brought us the ESV? No thanks." Absolutely not! That would be arrogant and ungrateful. They just hunger for the word of God and THAT'S what God honors.

@@josedopwell9645 Well said.

Not so the meaning is "giving myself a black eye" why should I read the KJV when the NIV is more accurate?

@James Dare garbage. I see you avoided responding to me, non-church-goer. Why are KJVonlyists usually such liars?

@@christshrt7686 another ignorant response. The NIV and other modern translations are the Word of God just as the KJV is, but it actually english as we speak it. Do not disgrace yourself with such disrespectful comments about God's Word. I doubt He is very impressed by it.

The NIV is an abomination

@@rosaliebent4833 I see that your comment is from 2 years ago.... I never avoid responding to people who do not believe the Bible. Post your comments and I will enjoy discussing the Bible with you!

@@martinbaker7032 You are free to follow the Catholic and Egyptian lines of scripture, but as for me and my house, we will follow God's word.

Most level headed and accurate comment regarding the KJV.

It doesn't have one error. Where'd you get that from?

@@markgushue9482 Isaiah 65:25 25The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD. King James Bible Isnt it supposed to be lion and lamb?

Rachel It says the lion should eat straw like the bullock (or ox). That is saying all those creatures will get along.

If it is King James only, then you are saying King James is God or a prophet.

@@tonyf4991 dont be so silly

@@DJFAmenHeavy How am I wrong? Have you ever looked into the history of the King James Bible? And to say that Bible alone and none else is wrong on many levels.

you mean like how it used the latin word 'lucifer' instead of the actual translation of the word which means LIGHT? or perhaps how it called Pentecost 'Easter' - a pagan festival. There are MANY errors in the KJV that modern translations correct.

No it is not

Luke 17 : 34 anyone?

Uh, King James specifically requested that the Hampton Court Conference hsve the KJV conform to the eschatology and episcopal structure of the English Church, which charted it's own path away from the rest of Christendom when Henry the 8th couldn't get a divorce. Human intentions are zll over this thing.

ESV

you might want to actually try READING a modern translation because your ignorance is showing.

@@rosaliebent4833 still haven't.

@@douglasbrinkman5937 thats what ignorance is - totally proud of being uninformed and wrong.

and what are they ACTUALLY doing? Giving you a BETTER rendering of the passage ie more accurately representing what God's Word says. How can that POSSIBLY be an issue?

AMEN! The authors have watered down the NIV, NASB, ESV, etc, to make it fit their belief system! But is it God's Holy Word? NOT AT ALL! IT'S MAN'S WORD, NOT GOD'S WORD

@@martinbaker7032 You have been lied to... Yes there was a Bible before the King James Bible. Your issue is that you are following the Westcott & Hort only cult.... They are just like their "daddy", he showed up in Genesis 3:1... He also said "...yea hath God said..." The King James Bible is not "just" a translation. It is the pure preserved word of God for English speaking people of today. Your Westcott & Hort only cult makes no sense.

@@martinbaker7032 You are a fool.... **Bible believers are not part of a cult** The King James Bible is against the devil... Your Westcott & Hort only cult is promoting modern English translations! They (modern translations) promote doctrines of devils! You should check yourself! You are working for your father the devil himself! He too said "Yeah hath God said?" (Genesis 3:1) You are also not very educated.... You missed part of what I said... But then your father the devil is a pro at taking things out of *CONTEXT* If you are promoting modern translations you are part of the Westcott & Hort only cult.

@@martinbaker7032 BTW The King James Bible is not "just a translation" it is the very word of God in English for English speaking people...

@@martinbaker7032 Bible believers are not in a cult... We believe God... God said: Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Psalm 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. I Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. I Peter 1:24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: I Peter 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you. Sadly you Westcott & Hort only cultists do not believe God. You do not have a pure Bible... I do! You do not trust God. I do. You worship the intellect.... I don't. God is smarter than you...

Staarrliner49 I am not an expert on Spanish language Bible, but I do know they have corrupted translations. For the real truth about good Bible in Spanish look up Robert Breaker. He made a video on this very issue

I think its a Holman KJV compact. But this specific model is no longer in print, but you still can find a Holman Large Print Compact at Amazon with prices ranging from $10 bucks for Bonded Leather to $30 bucks for genuine cowhide leather. It's not the SAME but is pretty close.

He has many videos with the evidence.

@@henrylaurel4476 : You are lying about him, he uses evidence to support the claim that the Received Text is copied from the originals and the Westcott and Hort Text is from corruptions.

@@henrylaurel1188 : The KJV Text is from the originals,kept pure by scribes throughout all these years, martyrs to preserve them, the Westcott and Hort Text is from a corrupted stream eventually out of the Vatican, of course you are free to read and study the corruptions, but what a waste of time.

@@golightly5121 There are several problems with the KJV. Those manuscripts you mentioned? They were not perfect or inspired. The Maseritic texts for the old testament were VERY late, dating to around the 10th century. The Textus Receptis for the new testament was written by a Dutch scholar who had incomplete greek manuscripts and had to back-translate a bunch from latin ones. Earlier manuscripts, closer to the originals, have been discovered since the KJV was written. The KJV was written before the Dead Sea Scrolls or the Codex Siniacus were discovered. These texts are archeological finds, and modern translations are largely based on them. They were burried in sand and preserved in pots! So your claims of a catholic conspiracy to alter the text and hide the intent of the originals makes no sense here.

@@Dreamerwild : Which modern translation is perfect, pure and preserved?

And I might add ... some VERY spiritually weak saints is another tragic result of PER-versions!! :(

Another thing I also noticed is they lack dissernment. So sad. GOD BLESS

+Debra Gill -- "So sad" that OTHERS are "lacking discernment? Try AGAIN! You are there listening to a guy who professes Christ, bash another daily - who also professes Christ, and THAT is *poor discernment* as one of them is a man of God and one is a spoiled brat. People need to decide which is which, though God already has.. Christ would probably say both need to grow up..but you are there STILL ..EVERY day listening to Eddie bash Bryan.. NO discernment in that. Proper discernment is what Apostle Paul said to do when he said: "from such, turn away" - as I did. You need discernment yourself..you largely lack it, and yes, it IS sad! You STILL comment that you '"agree" with Eddie...EVERY day.. *Total lack of any discernment* - You..Eddie..all of them...the Bible says GOSSIP is abomination in Romans 1 and that's ALL Eddie is doing making 943839248293 videos about Bryan.. ONE day, Jesus will tell him.. THAT is what it is going to take.. for you too? OR will you learn discernment while there is still time?? Jesus is *coming soon!*

and yet EVERY pseudo-cult uses the KJV as its basis

He's a kjvo, as in with your situation he would only approve of the kjv. Of course, That wouldn't mean he's right.

Hey bro...the other versions were written by men who didn't even believe sound biblical doctrine. Read a brief history below: followingjesuschrist3.com/2015/10/24/the-bible-version-controversy-a-brief-history/

Sola Scriptura I think you misinterpreted what I wrote, visit my channel :)

will do amigo...and glad to hear it.

Send us an email at arisetopottershouse@gmail.com for we are in Florida also. Good article btw.

Now your getting it.....

Actually it has many translation errors, which KJV only cultists refuse to acknowledge.

denleemel yet you post no proof, because you have none. Just like the countless other comments out there of people running their mouth saying God’s word has errors, but never can seem to post any proof. Here’s some proof that it has NO errors. www.kjvtoday.com/home/reliable-hebrew-text www.av1611.org/kjv/fight.html#fight15

Justin h Genesis 1:1 Did God create the heaven or heavens?

@Jason Wilkins - The Bible SAYS that it is without error. Read 2 Timothy 3:16-17. (I shouldn't have to tell you that if you studied the Bible)

God help you if you don't speak English and understand old English to boot. Looks like hell is your final resting place if you don't have the inspired KJV. All those poor Chinese, or Indian people. Hope they all learn old English in time to be saved.

If that is the case then I suspect that you believe that when God divided up the nations he did so according to the number of the children of Israel. Which would be silly of course since they were not around at the time of the tower of babel when God divided up the nations of the earth. Hmm, I wonder what other issues exist in the KJV?

Then you have turned that Bible into an idol instead of something Holy. And turned King James into God or the very least a prophet.

God's pure, preserved words are not a small issue... The modern versions, all of them, weaken major Bible doctrines.

@@jimd9339God had his Word established over a millenia before the KJV saw the light of day. The Church was also in existence over 1,500 years before there was the KJV. Do you reduce God to being contained within the pages of that one version of Scripture? Sure sounds that way. Do the modern versions truly weaken any doctrine of the Christian faith? I will grant you, that I prefer the Formal Equivalent translations, but God can draw people to Himself, using even a poorer paraphrase, if it speaks to their heart and soul . I ask again, do you limit God?

@@jimd9339 except not a SINGLE doctrine is in any way altered or minimised, trump supporter.

@@rosaliebent4833 Except you are a troll... You got me! I now know better... Enjoy your darkness Marxist.

Here's extreme detail and proofs... if you'd like kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a8Cjja91vL2-fac.html

Luke 17 : 34

Daric other "bibles" have mistakes, the KJV has none. Which book is better than the KJV? If you can think of one, why do you still use the KJV? If you can't think of one, why do you use any other bible?

Sean Lawler You seriously don't understand the history of the bible's transmission and translation process if you can seriously say to someone that the KJV has no problems with it and mean it. It shows complete ignorance of how it came about, as if angels came down from heaven with the KJV bible already translated into English. Go read White's "King James Only Controversy". You'll be much more informed and won't make such an ass of yourself when you talk.

show me one mistake.

ok ill show you one.. Romans 8.26 calls the Holy Spirit "it" The Holy Spirit is a person not a thing.

www.chick.com/catalog/books/1271.asp Daric, Click this link an get this book. It will show you what is missing from non KJV Bibles. I can buy you the book if you'd like. :-)

Use a dictionary online

The KJV Bible's Built in Dictionary kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bN2Vp6V-uJvHfKs.html

Webster's 1828 dictionary, A crudens or strong's concordance. Scripture interprets scripture.. remember. So if something isn't clear in one place is more clear in another. Always pray first in humility, for wisdom & guidance. It isn't just a textbook. It is his Holy Word. Spiritual things are Spiritually discerned.

Translation friend translation. You could say Yeshua or Joshua. You would be correct. Christ is English for Christos (greek) which is a translation of Messiah ( God's anointed )

Don't take this wrong but you are quite ignorant. Study.

@@martinbaker7032 I reckon that Reed Scott is a kjvo.

Kevin Jodrey it’s not all of Gods word or even Gods word if it leaves out scripture or changes the meaning of words which isn’t what God said or what he meant. I’ve been comparing versions when I read and see fairly big discrepancies in the NIV and ESV to the point I can’t trust either translation.

Henry Laurel God doesn’t say that. But a thorough study with an open mind will lead you to the conclusion that the critical text has been messed with and that the KJV did Not add verses and additional words.

Henry Laurel I never stated I’m an Onlyest. And even if I was it’s not a cult so don’t make claims you can’t verify. Stating what you did is called lying so obviously you have no problem doing what you accuse others of which also makes you a hypocrite. It’s also a lie that scribes added all of this words. I’ve done my research so if you want to keep making false accusations I’ll let you take that up with the one who will hold you accountable. It’s unbelievable that the liberal Christians of this day have swallowed hook line and sinker the deception of the devil.

That is a very important question. Never stop digging.

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

KZfaqr hmm that scripture is the word of God but you failed to show me the words I asked, the only thing I read was the truth. God is ONE. And three bear record in heaven .. the Father who is A SPIRIT aka HOLY GHOST ... and God is his word therefore these three are ONE. Not these three are separate but one... that's an oxymoron. In the very first chapter of the New Testament we can clearly read that Mary was found with CHILD OF THE HOLY GHOST. The Holy Ghost is the FATHER. And he had a SON. Created under the law and of a WOMAN. My God is one. Not three. Jesus said I have COME IN MY FATHERS NAME. The name of God is Jesus Christ. Not God the Son, there's no such deity of GOD THE SON. It doesn't exist.

I can show you where God the Father called His Son "God" in the word of God: Hebrews 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. God said that Jesus is God...thus Jesus, His "Son" IS God. I can show you where God the Father told the angels to worship Jesus: Hebrews 1:6 And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him. *Only God is to be worshiped* I can show you where Jesus claimed to be God: John 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. John 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. Philippians 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: I can show you where John called Jesus God: John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God. John 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. The trinity is at the baptism of Jesus: Matthew 3:13 Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. Matthew 3:14 But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me? Matthew 3:15 And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him. Matthew 3:16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: Matthew 3:17 And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. God the Father is in heaven. God the Holy Spirit is in the air. God the Son is on earth in Jordan after getting baptized. *The Trinity* The word "Godhead" means "trinity". Acts 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. Definition of Godhead: 1 : divine nature or essence 2 capitalized a : God sense 1 b : the nature of God especially as existing in three persons -used with "the" Acts 17:29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the *Godhead* is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and *Godhead;* so that they are without excuse: Colossians 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the *Godhead* bodily. Jesus is "divine". Jesus is *Deity*. Jesus is God. The Saviour is God & Jesus is the ONLY Saviour therefore Jesus IS God: Philippians 3:20 For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: I Timothy 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope; I Timothy 2:3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; I Timothy 4:10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. II Timothy 1:10 But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel: Titus 1:3 But hath in due times manifested his word through preaching, which is committed unto me according to the commandment of God our Saviour; Titus 1:4 To Titus, mine own son after the common faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour. Titus 2:10 Not purloining, but shewing all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things. Titus 2:13 Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Titus 3:4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Titus 3:6 Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; *Jesus is the Saviour and Jesus is therefore God* If you knew Jesus you would KNOW that Jesus is God.

@@jimd9339 yeah, Jesus Christ is God... it's you that cannot understand the words. You're confused and I'm not going to explain it to you because you don't care to listen.

KZfaq: gipp where are the originals Watch the 90 minute version.

Starxteel KJB1611 I noticed you post Dr. Gipp's sermons on your channel, and would like to thank you for that here. :O)

You are welcome :)

Starxteel KJB1611 and it's just a coincidence you disable comments on your videos.

but isnt the KJV 'perfect' according to you and your cult?

what a pile of drivel. Like every other conspiracy theorist you abuse those who disagree with you. You are ignorant.

@@terryford6783 Ignorance is your cult, simpleton. There were no other bibles around for 270 years after the KJB took hold except the corrupt Roman Catholic trash bible which all MV's use the same trash manuscripts that the RCC used for their trash bible.

@@rosaliebent4833 They don't disagree with me, but with God, it's His word, I'm just the messenger. Get a clue simpleton!

@@craigluchin4585 the Word of God says NOTHING about some English translation 1600 years after the Bible was written. what an idiotic argument.

Brandon sets himself above God and his pure word?

@@herbbearingseed no, he doesn't. Next question.

Kjv was a bit more literal with the Latin vulgate than Tyndale's translation was.

@@anonymousperson6462 They did not use the Latin Vulgate because it is a Catholic manuscript. The King James Bible translators used a different Latin... It was in the right line of Manuscripts.

@@jimd9339 kjv is catholic. It had anglocatholic translators, used the bishops Bible and the rheims new testament.

Greek and Hebrew are dead? Surely you jest.

The Way if you can’t understand the KJV you really need to get an education. I’ve never had a problem understanding it other then maybe a couple obsolete words which are easy enough to look up.

So, to read a perfect Bible I need to learn Greek and Hebrew expertly? The more than fifty scholars, the best of the best, did it already!

@@henrylaurel1188 : The two different manuscript streams disagree with you, I am overjoyed with Antioch, you suffer through Alexandrian.

right i have the cepher also i believe its YAH Word

If you can read Greek, you don't need the KJV or any other of the English translations. No non-Greek version will ever be as accurate as the Greek NT.

@@northoftoofar3772 except for I have learned that the NT was first in aramaic, then translated to Greek. Consider Mark 14 : 3/Matthew 26 : 6 with Leviticus 13 : 46-50.

@@anonymousperson6462 Yeah, I've heard that, too. Is it safe to assume that by "I have learned", you actually mean "I watched a KZfaq video/read an online article and believed what I was told without looking into it"? Aramaic primacy is a myth, and a bit of research proves as much.

@@northoftoofar3772 no, that was unsafe because there's evidence for it if you'll look around. Did you look into the two verses I told you to consider? There's a problem there, as there will be with any translation made from Greek manuscripts. An English translation done from aramic manuscripts, however, has surmised that in mark 14 : 3 and Matthew 26 : 6 "Simon the jar maker" (potter) was meant, for which there is no problem. There's acts 8 : 37, for which instead of being seen as an extra verse, it could now be seen as a skipped verse because the aramic ending in 38 was very similar to 37. We also know Jesus spoke aramic for there are places where aramic is there in the NT and then is translated (like with "Talitha cumi"). Josephus wrote of this as well. Yes, there are videos and documentation on this.

@@northoftoofar3772 here's a link regarding Simon the leper vs Simon the potter : kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pLJpn9Cn38fVo6M.html

Its a good question but they wont answer because their position is simply stupid.

Pray for them. Only the Holy Spirit can bring people to the point of humbling.