💁 George Strait everybody

🤣🤣🤣

Yup, just wait about 10,000 years

Yep, we are doomed...

And i will have to get a deep diving submarine to get home!!

I don't think it matters one way or the other? There isn't any advantage to rising sea levels and higher global temperatures. The ecosystem will be skewed to support life that can adjust to the new "normal". Some plants, animals, and insects will adjust and even thrive in the new environment: while, others will not. We have to decide what % of the +8 billion human population we are willing to sacrifice for this future.

@@mrgold3591 well of course but getting the facts right is still important

@@kobeclifford5421 Unfortunately, we all got into the habit of making up and only believing facts that fit our views. I don't think it matters if it is climate change, global warming, increase of carbon emissions, or normal warming/cooling cycles of the earth. The planet is warmer today compared to 100 years ago and it will be warmer 100 years from now. Doesn't matter what is causing it; but, can we start to do something to slow it down?

If rising heat is done on purpose over the land masses then it would cause desertification and would not increase humidity but prevent it.

@@floridaknight3052 I think Marcel Williams is also neglecting to factor in the higher heat over land means a change in weather patterns. The USA/Europe had "heat domes" in areas in summer of +40C/+100F in areas that normally see temps in mid-upper 20C (70F-lower 80F) range (Pacific Northwest, eastern part of USA, England, Central Europe). We are not getting the normal rain/snow all year, ground and surface fresh water levels are at an all time low, and wildfires are out of control adding more pollution to the air making things worse. After heat domes comes cold domes in winter. Temps are too low for snow and you get days/weeks of below 0C/0F temps like a cold frozen dessert. Over 240 people died in Texas in 2021 when a climate caused cold dome settled over it for a week.

Then their fear mongering was successful.

Lol like we're really going too be able to fully control our climate. Look at ice core samples, this earth has been uninhabitable meany times before human existence. THAT'S IRREFUTABLE!

The earth goes through cycles. Our lives are hardly compared to a blink of an eye in that amount of time. It will get much warmer, and much colder later further down the line at some point.

@@jfishmento4147 Prove it.

It’s really not that far down the line

That would be a nightmare for me, I get cold very easily.

I’m ok with my house being at 50

Maybe global warming will trigger a global cooling that could yield a liveable balance. Would humans be able to adapt to this new climactic equilibrium? Doubt it.

When domino's fall, they don't stop until all of them have fallen, it's just like current living conditions, it's only going to get worse, no matter what man attempts to do in order to try and delay events that are inevitably going to occur, man's time will run out, the question is, when?

@FBG Do the world a favor, don't multiply.

especially Cairns, it makes Logan look like high society.

@@Freshboii_tru Doesn't matter what we do, the Earth will come out of this Ice Age either way

@@johnnywaldron5402 When? On 3-11-11. The Fukushima ELE has already slaughtered more life than anything else since the Asteroid Impact ELE of 66 million years ago. And it's still only in its beginning state. The Fukushima ELE still has an extremely long time yet to run its course. Many, many, many thousands of years.

it’s climate change making the glaciers melt. while they won’t melt overnight, this could be a possibility soon

That's right...because we'd be dead and there would be nothing to be concerned about.

Same thoughts I’m having . It’s all fear mongering.

There are a lot of untruths and false information,stats going onto the computer modeling are not right and undetectable ,it's all politics and money grabbing and brainwashing the young people. Alot of people are making money out of the false narrative of climate change and its been going on for 50 to 60 plus years.Dirty lying politics.

well 65 meters or 180 feet is pretty small compared to the rest of the water in the oceanic glass too. To proportion is the same, but that small amount will flood most of the large cities because they are coastal.

The Earth’s climate has been oscillating between hot and cold for millions of years, it’s a natural pendulum caused by oscillations of the Earth’s axis that rights itself whenever it swings too far in either direction by utilising ocean currents and forestation. The issue is not with CO2 levels being released, that’s just a patsy, a guilt trip designed to take the blame away from the real culprits and place it on the heads of the filthy unwashed masses. The issue is with a lack of forestation to absorb the CO2. Replant the rainforests that are being shaved from the Earth for massive profit and watch CO2 drop, along with temperatures. Money is always the cause of every problem. Always.

Well the ice in a glass make up the volume that water isn’t using…so that’s why when ice melts it doesn’t overflow the glass. So comparing that to our planet is not accurate. Water on our planet needs a place to go so it will flood coastal lands.

Huááá..Best comment ever......😂😂😂😂

ican tell your 5ft7 man self got bullied all of 9- 12thgrade😅😂😂

@@kentherapy7022 no it's not the best comment

@@wildlifewarrior2670 calm down keyboard warrior

@@the1andonlyyoungone561 I'm a Warrior without being behind the keyboard

You’re not understanding the point of the video. Move along.

30 degree increases are being seen today !! Matter of fact on Tuesday (June 19th) in London, their temperature reached 100°!! The average for that time of year is 70, a difference of 30 degree's!!!

@@Fusion991 bruh it’s you not him

@@Anthony-tu7oz Yeah,as if it never happend in the past!!!But a lot off measurements from the past have been "corrected" so you can not see the real temperatures in the past anymore! But not all are "corrected"!!In the nigtteen twenties it was a lot warmer than now.And further back in 18th century it was warmer than today.Dont believe the the so called scientists!!They are just scammers.

@@computeraddic675 the scientist are scammers you say!?! WTF!? The validity of anything you say is meaningless to me after a comment like that!

Yes! You (I appreciate your dry - uh, pardon pun - sense of humor) and a whole generation of snowflakes.

Yeah it is, except that global warming is more of a long term thing and sudden spikes for even a few years do not change the fact that the surface temperature of the planet is still going up WAY faster than any ice age ending should justify

@@joeeoj6187 Finally someone with an actual brain

@@ryanstout4593 That's not true, during the medieval warming, The rates of warming were much higher than today. Also it was 4° warmer than it is today back then. Validated by the pirie ries map

100 metres is ~328 feet

@@noneofyourbizness The data I have seen said about 120 meters. My figure of 100 meters was a bit offhand.

California was also going to break off and fall into the ocean. Still keeping my fingers crossed on that one.

They were creating democrat fearful voters that love to hate.

I remember when they were predicting an ice age and we were all going to freeze and starve. There were even giant pull down maps in one of my classrooms in the early 1970s. The maps showed all the areas on the globe where we wouldn't be able to grow crops. Turned out to be all political BS as usual. Interestingly Biden was in office even waaaaaaay back then.

not far from it

Yep, and acid rain was going melt our skin off.

Yeah the flood that never happened

@@jigodimayuga2772 the earth shows otherwise

@@dalestovall9751maybe a frozen flood? Snowball earth?

F Australia……..

Australia wouldnt lose much coastline.

​@@GfysimpletonsF ur mom

"THEY" the leftist climate gloom and doom machine never say "NATURAL" its always our fault. and yes it is a natural cycle that occurs every single 100,000 years and we are now at the end of that 100,000 year mark. these extreme climate changes have naturally occurred this way for millions of years every single 100,000 years.but but the "THEY" are saying it exactly backwards its not warming that WILL happen it is COOLING that IS happening and has been happening for thousands of years already.

Yes

We are being lied to abt the grand canyon

The Grand Canyon was never filled with water. It was formed by erosion of the Colorado River.

... possibly

You not alone. Never bothered to find out. Was just like ice.

Si

Yes.

The book "Fingerprints of the Gods" explains all of it.

What

@@justinkuderer2251 that was the joke going over your head

It was intentional in order to give all those failed tests and missions a safe place to crash without incinerating a bunch of people.

No they won't. If you actually talk to proper scientists like I did via webcam back in college the people at the South Pole research facility said we a graph proving it too, the ice is getting thicker as time goes on. Antarctica is growing, by 2090 to 2110 they estimate it'll actually crash into Argentina, cutting off the South Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Climate change is basically the Earth's position around the Sun and has been debunked many times, reason it appears hotter is because Jupiter and Saturn messed up its orbit pulling it further from the Sun making its elliptical orbit more dramatic, closer during summer further during winter *northern hemisphere* so Arctic is melting more, which is sending more water eventually to Antarctica to freeze at a more rapid pace therefore making it larger. Was supposed to go there last year as was in Africa and was gonna take a ride to Antarctica via resupply ship from South Africa. But in short no places like Florida won't go underwater that's not how the Earth works.

@@bjt81366 No it's because Florida is pretty flat and doesn't get many if any at all tornadoes least to my knowledge it doesn't. You need to launch from a safe place that's easy to resupply so gotta be near the sea for the import of resources, fuel etc and have enough flat space to build everything I've been there when I was 6! Seen Kennedy Space Centre. It's massive! Gotta be guessing 1,000 acres in total gotta be around that. You couldn't build that in say New York state or Nebraska, Idaho etc, you just couldn't. Also parts of California are pretty suitable for space agencies also Texas could be or New Mexico as again wide open flat areas. But Florida was kinda the ideal location, plus the weather doesn't hurt either lol.

:(((( yeah

You made that up.

As if the video wasn't bad enough! 🙄🙄🙄

Oooo how can I put much into someone who doesn’t even know how to use the English language. Did you mean “city’s” or “….all the cities….” . Just asking.

@@MyHeart1955 edited it especially for you. Would hate you to lose any sleep.

Most people who live in florida were not born there. They were born in places like where you live. Without florida the next generation of them will stay your neighbors.

grandmum**😅😅😂😂😂

That's an oversimplification. A minor peak density occurs near and slightly below the freezing point, but water will expand beyond that point given enough temperature.

@@BG-bx4ey That and it's built up at the poles. A good example is a glass of water with enough ice in it to bring the water level to the rim. Then if the ice melts, the water level in the glass wont go down, but spill over.

@@SiriusSphynx you should actually perform that experiment and see what really happens. Spoiler alert. The water level won’t change.

It’s not likely to refreeze in this scenario

@@poopandfartjokes Exavtly, because the ice cube just displaces its own weight. If the ice cube melts it results in as much water than the ice displaced previously, meaning that the water level doesn`t change. All the ice above the water surface is already accounted for when it comes to the overall water level, because the weight of the ice above the water is still used to displace water under the surface.

Thanks for explaining how things melt

But the return of real sailing ships would be dope

An ice age is when you have polar ice caps

They are all scientists in their mind

Since you're not a scientist how do you know this video is based on facts?

All science is theory based. Nothing is facts. If you come up with ur own science department with ur own theories, everything you say is fact and can’t be proven otherwise

i...

Obviously that wouldnt even happen since nobody would be alive to scuba dive lol

That wouldn't happen because sea level rise would be about 500 feet and the ESB is 1200 feet tall.

As long as you live there.

You better start moving to the Equator. The Northern hemisphere will all be under ice.

I don't know that, BUT no politicians 'BELIEVE THERE IS GLOBAL WARMING." The Glaciers will not freeze again, but we the world, working together without stupid ignorant selfish," let's live here and now and screw the rest of the people!" Because "we are special, entitle RICH WHITE and [others] MEN" individuals, [ like trump and his minions wanting power and fame, to me their FAME IS THEY ARE HORRIBLE MEN. and many others who never pay taxes. The world is doomed with them in charge!!] GET RID OF THEM, DO NOT VOTE THESE SELFISH CRAZY PEOPLE INTO OFFICE. "WE ARE THE PEOPLE" we are the BOSSES, use your brains! THINK ABOUT THAT- YOU WHO ARE AWED BY A CONMAN, LOOK AT THE MESS HE'S MADE. And many other greedy men and women. Jan 6th was just a dress rehearsal. They have dangerous plans. Look at the conniving governor in Texass: The Uvauld school shootings as they sat there worried about WTF and children died. The cops were chicken, listening to those politicians. WTH, SHAME ON THEM, SHAME; THEY ARE DISCUSTING LIARS, how can they look in the mirror, how can their wives even sleep with the scum.

Watch the movie “the day after tomorrow” youll see

@@Queen.TV. that movie had me fucked up

That movie is not even scientifically correct. Just Hollywood stuff.

i mean it did cool the earth.... the entire earth was covered by clouds and shot decreasing the temperature and pretty much killed everything, but this is the end of an ice age that started around 2 million years ago

The Earth is Cooling more Than Heating. #beyondthought

LOL that's a good one. Reducing the oceanic water level measurably would be so energy intensive as to make it an economic impossibility as well as impossible from an engineering perspective due to the scale required.

@@xenuno you're forgetting about the physics whereby If you convert water to gas or even ice, you can store it more efficiently and take up less space than water does.

My brain was thinking the exact same thing but I didn’t know how to word it. You nailed it. No it wouldn’t solve all the snow ball effect problems we would face but it’s a solid solution amongst many humans could achieve.

I think creating additional Great Lakes would do nothing to slow the melting glacier’s. The problem is too immense.

Right, my thoughts exactly! Lol 😆🤣

You would know, Bruce.

If the ice were floating, as all Arctic ice is, it would already be moving the same volume as the water created when it melts. This is a direct result of the fact that it floats. If the ice was on land, when it melts it will no longer stay on land and will flow downward, usually eventually to the sea. This includes all the glaciers and about half of the Antarctic.

Facts

What are you talking about? The people who you think won't be displeased by climate change, they will face many negative consequences due to the loss of sea ice and glaciers too. Here's just one example: anywhere where life is still somewhat habitable, they'll see huge amounts of migrating climate refugees. And wherever there's large concentrations of people, there's needs to be large amounts of resources, i.e. like food, freshwater and housing, but there won't be enough resources for everyone. There will be constant wars over whatever resources there are left, and every living creature will have to struggle for survival!

@@kryptonarie6367 like what? Nobody in the center of North America would be sad about a warmer winter or a longer growing season as I mentioned. Nothing wrong with that.

@@jaydee975 Stop talking foolish and educate yourself! Part of the reason for the catastrophic weather events we're seeing worldwide, are because the world's oceans are also becoming warmer and more acidic at an accelerated rate! Why, because people are too lazy and the fossil fuel industry too greedy to admit carbon and methane emissions from human activity are causing global warming! Roughly half of the oxygen production on Earth comes from our oceans. The majority of this oxygen production is from oceanic phytoplankton, which forms the basis of the marine food chain and provides half the and ocean's oxygen and again the Earth's oxygen (while trees, shrubs, and grasses provide the other half)! Already, gradually warming ocean waters have killed off phytoplankton globally by a staggering 40 percent since 1950. Why has pyplankton declined some 40%, besides man-made chemicals and pollutants poisoning our oceans and destroying oceanic habitats, it's largely due to GLOBAL WARMING warming the oceans!!! As the climate warms, so does the oceans-bad news for phytoplankton, since warm waters contain less oxygen, and therefore less phytoplankton, than cooler waters. What happens to humans and animals when there aren't enough trees from global over deforestation and oceans are too warm and inhospitable for plankton to survive? What, everyone in 30, 50 or 100 years from now, they just all die a slow suffocating death as atmospheric oxygen depletes, because today apathetic people like you say global warming isn't real nor a threat!?!

You’re not going to see any affects of “Global Warming” in your lifetime

Yeah soon it'll be summer then it'll be fall then it'll be winter. That's a lotta change.

it won't believe me , more like it will freeze over nothing to worry about

In 20,000 years there will be a sheet of ice 2 miles thick covering most of the civilized world. Stop listening to these hucksters they are lying to you.

@@danstory4286 true

That like gravity isnt real

I see where you are going but is that accurate? I'm only inquiring because some of that ice sheet covers Alaska Canada and Russia and I'm pretty sure that would have some impact wouldn't it?

The video is referring to the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica. Those would have devastating impacts as far as coastal flooding goes

@@uploadstuff1762 The ice sheets of Antarctica expand that continent by about three times most of that ice Is over water fun fact

Oh yea I was trying to reply to.milus scrugggs

Then why are ocean levels rising already? Don't try to tell me about rock slides. That denier theory has already been debunked. Also those glaciers are sticking hundreds of feet into the air. They are not underwater. Try again.

Same

Who knows

Lmao 😅😂🤣😭

youre existence is the downside😅😂😂punk

all the glaciers did not melt 20,000 year ago

@@acerevival33 but the Arctic was ice free in the summer and that is when the Beringian crossed the dry Bering straight

If that happened then arctic and antarctic would have looked different than what we now used

@@chesterdagoc5915 you do know that the ice cores that they drill at the deepest part of Antarctica contained tropical plants don't you?

@@terenceiutzi4003 duh millions of years ago Antartica wasn’t covered with ice. So it’s only common sense that ancient tropical plants were found underneath the ice.

Yes there are mountains that would be above any rising sea level, but if you look at the coastal towns in Japan and the number of people living there, you only need to look at the devastation from the 2011 Tsunami to see the extent of damage.

Someday you will find out.

@@chuckychuck How ?

@@chuckychuck most people alive today will be dead by then

We’re still in an ice age. If one or more permanent bodies of ice are present, we’re in an ice age. People see these slight warming events in the context of human life. Hundreds of years instead of the more accurate, realistic thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands and millions of years. Milankovic cycles play a huge part in warming and cooling. The obliquity, eccentricities, etc, all play a massive role. None of the scaremongers mention these things though.

Paul I thank you for your statement

No. That breaks the narrative, just like desertification being strongly tied to how big glaciers are.

Ice cube is water but in solid form, which “takes up space” in a glass cup. Putting ice in a glass with it already full of water will overflow because of the additional space they take up. Placing ice cubes in a cup prior to adding water to it won’t make it overflow because the amount of space the cubes take up in the cup have already been accounted for. Fun fact: water temperature cools quicker when pouring water in a cup full of ice vs putting ice in a glass full of water.

Bingo. Most people do not know that for many years scientists included the Arctic ice until some kid pointed that out.

Was the cup fulll of water before or after you put the ice in it?

The problem is that the ice in glaciers isn’t already in the water. Glaciers are above the water on land so in your example you would have to imagine the ice as being out of the glass completely but have the melt water run into the glass and that would indeed raise the water level and probably flood the glass.

@@neilclarkwork I wasn't the person that stated the glass was full of water before putting the ice in it. I am the person that asked if the glass was full before the ice was put into it.

Exactly, this guy is talking out his ass.

Awe look at you proud girls denying global warming 🤣🤣🤣

key words, “back in the late 90s”

@@josephfuller6229 poor you should realise that scientists no longer use the term of global warming :))

@@luangj2866 ok what ever you say proud girl 🤣🤣

What about evaporation did you take that into account in your opinion!!

"Truthful and timely disclosures surveying serious and frank discussions about the self-fulfilling momentum of magnetic flows embodied in the taste of footballs, can effect consciousness as an expression of psycho-physical parallels. But now it’s beginning to make more sense unique as a composite of generalities. Anyone can do it, you just have to get lucky. Inter-dimensional portals will open up and safety guidelines should be included to welcome home higher and higher levels of mass spectrometers living high off the hog. There is a pattern here which should be noted. It has the potential to shed insight on the otherwise unobservable interior of lemon zest that can answer complex questions in perfectly composed sentences. It is a significant turn of events. You should think about it." ---Albert Einstein

half the glaciers have melted.... slowly within the last 11,000 years, look up what the land masses looked like 11,000 years ago... huge difference

and antarctic is a gigantic land mass with ice on TOP of it.... not in WATER... what happens when ice melts on your roof..???

This is what I’m saying, when I have water and ice in my cup, when the ice melts the water doesn’t over flow over the sides because the amount of volume from the extra water that comes from the ice cubes when it melts will be equal to the total amount of volume previously displaced by the cube. Furthermore, the glaciers which are just basically giant floating ice cubes have already caused water displacement similar to the cubes in the cup so the water on earth isn’t going to suddenly flood over like in the cup. Anyways that’s my theory and I hope I’m right. Many places on earth are in severe droughts currently so maybe a reset and increase in water levels is needed in the long run, as bad as it may sound.

I live at a place that's 1500 foot above sea level so all it would do is bring fishing closer to me!!!

I really don't think the illustration is meant to reflect actual predictions or numbers. The authors didn't draw the illustration & Im sure they didn't tell the illustrator " gimme a depiction of the statue of Liberty as if the sea level had risen exactly 213 feet" or 305 feet, that's not the purpose or point of the illustration- its exaggerated of course, bcuz that draws more viewers obviously.

A voice of sanity crying in the wilderness!

antartica is a continent covered in a thick sheet of ice

One thing for sure 😃 we can continue to get tattoos and eat all the buffalo wild wings with unlimited onion rings

Fyi we are coming out of a ice age.. humans have almost zero impact on thr temperature change its all liberal BS it's about $$$ . My aunt and uncle are one top geologists its all BS

@@beararmshunt7498 idk if you are trying to draw conclusions as to my political disposition, I would hope not because you would effectively out your self as an idiot seeing as I’m not even a libertarian lol. I judge my perceptions based on the science/data analysis that has been conducted.

Everyone conveniently leaves out how ice expands. They also say that all of the floating icebergs only have 10% or less above water so I feel like if anything the water levels may go down.

How does this scenario imply that water is being made exactly?!?!?!?!

While if we ever leave our current Ice Age, (we have permanent ice at the poles, so we are in an ice age now), the ocean levels WILL rise. Not much dispute over that. the question is how much?

The ice sheets are above sea level. If you have a glass filled to the rim with water and then let an ice cube melt onto this full glass? The melting ice will then cause the water to spill over. The submarine permafrost is located mostly around the poles. No one knows how much is trapped in ice but estimates are around 750,000 to 800,000 square miles. That is nothing compared to how much water the ice sheets hold. In addition, if the permafrost melt - it will greatly increase greenhouse gasses. From about 3,000 years ago to about 100 years ago, sea levels naturally rose and declined slightly, with little change in the overall trend. Over the past 100 years, global temperatures have risen about 1 degree C (1.8 degrees F), with sea level response to that warming totaling about 160 to 210 mm (with about half of that amount occurring since 1993), or about 6 to 8 inches. And the current rate of sea-level rise is unprecedented over the past several millennia.

shhh, science kills this video.. you're ruining their "Show"

Pangaea ultimate super continent

The Marshall islands are slowly emerging underwater...they moving to California and Oregon

Exactly the same

@@gram01 that is not caused by rising sea levels but the movement of the tectonic plates.

Actually, history has five or six global freezings over the last 7000 years. Killed up to 25% of the global population each time.

The earth was all under water at one time. God flooded it, it wasn’t an accident of nature

What is a mountain range today, might've been the sea floor 10s or 100s of thousand years ago

Climate change can melt those Glaciers in 20-50 years tho so it’s not Impossible

@@syco_hundreds2661 Based on what?

Same, supposedly CA & FL are supposed to have been flooded & gone by now...but yet here we still are!

Wait another 30 years? Will you be around?

@@by2004 I might be but my hair won't