Join The 1% Community Here: bit.ly/3rqzGpw Join The Unplugged Alpha’s Guide to Divorce: bit.ly/3IjWjSC Comment Your Thoughts Below GET ON MY EMAIL LIST TO RECEIVE A FREE CHAPTER FROM MY BOOK: entrepreneursincars.com/red-flags/ GET MY BOOK - "The Unplugged Alpha, The No Bullshit Guide To Winning With Women & Life:" amzn.to/3fIVW3J SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEN: theunpluggedalpha.com/collections/all-products MY WEBSITE: www.richcooper.ca/ TACTICAL SOAP: Use code "COOPER" at checkout and Get 10% off Tactical Soap mentioned here: bit.ly/2jQEZbz REQUEST A VIDEO TOPIC: entrepreneursincars.com/request SUB MY MAIN CHANNEL: kzfaq.info SUB MY TUA PODCAST CHANNEL: kzfaq.info

Great video, there is nothing like a perfect marriage or relationship, I learnt that in everything there is always a solution, 5 years ago I and my wife divorced because we were having some difficulties in our marriage but we are back together ,it was a really bad phase but we got through it

Debating a Feminist is like trying to communicate with a fish who doesn't know how to ride a bicycle.

It's like debating a religious fundamentalist, except their chosen deity is the Human Resources department.

“Debate” requires logic, reason and a concern for truth and facts.. these people care for none of that.. totally emotionally driven… they will say anything to get what they want in the moment.. and they will completely change their narrative as the situation changes to continually get what they want

All feminist need to debate Sean Connery…….. wink wink!!!

How do you debate someone who thinks the sky is green? You can't. It's impossible. That's what it's like to debate a feminist. They have no argument and will never waiver in their beliefs

I've watched alot of Modern Wisdom and I have to disagree with Moff here. I think Chris knows the truths and mistruths around this stuff, but he also understands what he can take mainstream and what he cant. I also think he doesnt want lumped in with the red pill crowd in general.

Arguing with a feminist is a waste of time, but it's also a test of frame for whoever challenges them. By experience, I learned to not to get sucked in emotionally and hold my lane (as a motorcyclist does), and abandon the argument when you realize that returns are diminishing. If they want to engage in an honest discussion, they're welcome; if not I'm not taking them seriously. But the important thing is not to cave in because you realize she feels offended or emotional. It's time to re-educate females; shame, guilt, insult or the need to be right don't work or make a dent in the universe (at least not in mine). And I agree with the assessment on Chris Williamson: he's very much aware where the minefield is, and he conveniently avoids it.

Gaslighting, as defined by women - When she engages in any form of rotten behavior and proceeds to explain why her man made her feel the way she did which is why she acted as she did, and he explains using reason why this is completely illogical. She is left having to deal with reality in the moment and only later will she realize that her feelings and rotten actions were right and she had been "gaslighted" by logic. This sounds like a joke but it happens a lot. When you break it down for a woman and she's boxed into accepting reality, that's not the end. Those emotions will come back and take control again later and she'll accuse you of making her think she was the problem using that "logical gaslighting stuff". Be careful guys.

This... is how a civilized intellectual conversation with a group of men goes. If this was a panel of women.... my goodness... noise, interruptions, many at once over-talking, emotional breakdowns, crying etc... This is why men are the ones who get things done.

Not only dishonest, plays on the other team.

A nightmare

Yes, arguing with a feminist is like arguing with a religious fundamentalist. They have their prepacked responses to your questions and have never really given any thought as to whether their responses really make any sense.

Rich Cooper - taking advantage of Simps one day at a time, charging $2000 per video call 😂

James Lindsey should be a guest here!!!

What’s it like debating a woman…

The big issue here is that so many of these self proclaimed “feminists” are actually “narcissists”, and that’s why trying to debate them is about as useful as having a debate with the nearest wall. Because the thing with them is that they don’t argue or debate in good faith, they argue or debate with one goal in mind, and that is to “win” the argument/debate. It’s all about ego. That’s it. And they’ll use every trick in the book to achieve that goal, including gaslighting, strawman arguments, etc, etc. That’s why he said it’s totally exhausting arguing with them, because they’re constantly trying to mess with your mind. It’s like your mind has been put through a clothes dryer. You’re there legitimately arguing or debating in good faith, actually caring about what you’re saying, whereas they’re there solely to feel like they “beat you”, and to keep you engaging with them for as long as possible. Why, because then you’re giving them the one thing they want the most, which is attention. That’s all they’re there for. Attention. They don’t give two shits what you’re saying, or even what they’re saying, they just want to make sure you keep giving them attention for as long as possible, and they’ll use every trick in the book to achieve that, and bonus points if they can get under your skin and get you flustered, upset, etc. You really need to learn how to recognise them through their MO, because it doesn’t matter whether they identify as a “feminist”, or a “democrat”, or a “republican”, or a “vegan”, or a “black piller” or whatever. If they’re highly narcissistic by nature, you’ll be able to recognise them through their MO, and you’ll know that debating them is a monumental waste of time. Most “trolls” on the internet are “narcissists”. Their trolling is simply bait, to try and suck anyone in to one of these endless arguments to nowhere, that I was describing above. The hardcore “black pillers” that you see arguing with anyone and everyone online are almost certainly just “narcissists”. Which is why arguments with them go nowhere, no matter how much evidence to the contrary they’re presented with. “Grandiose narcissists” think they’re the biggest and the best, whereas “covert/vulnerable narcissists” are the biggest victims, the most ugly, etc.

Every guy should watch a movie called ..IN THE BEDROOM. Great example of the decisions we make as men. Textbook

You call a guy "dishonest", yet whenasked why you think he's "dishonest", you say you don't think he is "dishonest"..... i think it's you that has a fragile ego

Ever watched a dog chasing its tail ? It's much the same, just less rewarding (& intellectual) 😉

There is no debating a feminist

I like Chris Williamson, I love Rich and I am not so sure about Moff. Sorry.

Circular logic, tautology, circumlocution and every other meritless distraction technique and logical fallacy is employed with impunity.

It's funny because the first time Rollo mentioned Chris I said Chris is a cuttlefish and then later on in the video Rollo says the same thing hahaha

feminism or any kind of equality fails because of this concept called "luck"