The part that made me snerk was 'having left, comma, are they...'

I was in love with him

I'll never be able to fully erase his Psycho persona from my mind when I see him, either as himself like here, or in any other role. Hitch perfectly cast him as Norman Bates. It doesn't help me that he was rather creepy in another picture I saw with him, Pretty Poison, even though the real psycho in that film was the gorgeous Tuesday Weld. Maybe Anthony was a nice guy, but I don't think I could ever really trust him. lol

Amen. The panel guessed less correctly as a whole after her demise. Sad.

He sure was.

@@steventrosiek2623 I agree

Same.

I wanted to hear her say more.

They were blown away by it. Could not help themselves from imitating it!

justess martin - very handsome, loved him in Psycho, such a mama’s boy - lol

@@jolenaagapisou3803 yes

WHEN IT WAS STILL OK TO STAY IN THE CLOSET.

Must have been her sitting next to Tony Perkins, who was having affairs with men throughout the 1950s and 60s.

More like relationships. And way past the 60's.

I'd have to agree that CBS didn't exactly have its happy face on, after Dorthy's use of the word.

I love John's response to if they come in heterosexually. "Most of the time they come by bus."

She's switched on.

Could not find any record of Charles Reece being on the 1952 U.S. Olympic weightlifting team. Perhaps he was an alternate.

Amazing man! Eau Gallie isn't far from the cape and Patrick AFB, where my Dad was stationed. My Dad worked at the Cape on missiles for 10 years. Loved seeing this so much! 👏👏👏👏🥰🥰🥰👍👍👍

@@patrickdowling529....If you watch again, Daly says Reece was a 'member' of the weightlifting team, presumably fulfilling a role outside of competing.

...and handsome to boot! 🙂

He was on Password a lot, too and there are quite a few of them on KZfaq...❤

They’d only ruin it,bring tears to the eyes

Its the blend of personalities that make a show. You can't fake a genuine relationship and these people jelled.

Honestly, it's the prettiest she's ever looked!

Oh he really was an extremely talented actor, and incredibly attractive to boot. His career was full of promise in the 50s, but he didn't get all that much to do outside of Norman Bates-like roles after Psycho. It's a shame.

What's My Line? I'm surprised to read your assessment of Anthony Perkins's career in the above comment. He seems to have had quite an extensive film resume, according to IMDb (www.imdb.com/name/nm0000578/), including roles in such popular films as "Catch-22" and "Murder on the Orient Express," among many others. He also had a number of stage roles in the Broadway theater (see: www.broadwayworld.com/people/Anthony-Perkins/#.U8UoyTDD_IU). I believe I saw him in "Equus" in the 70s.

SaveThe TPC Yes, but he never really had a big role, always part of an ensemble (certainly in the films you cited). His *leading* roles were mostly Psycho sequels and Bates-like roles, such as in "Crimes of Passion". He was fantastic in Welles's "The Trial", a movie a lot of Welles fans don't even like, but I love it. He was capable of much greater things, but was pretty much typecasted. I don't know about, nor was I referring to, his stage career, just films.

What's My Line? Tony sure as hell was alluring.

melissad75 -- My favorite role for Tony Perkins was in "Friendly Persuasion," which was based on the novel "The Friendly Persuasion" by Jessamyn West. Perkins played a young Quaker man, Josh Birdwell, who was the son of an Indiana Quaker farmer, Jess Birdwell, played by Gary Cooper. The young man decides to take up arms to defend his area of Indiana against raiding rebel troops during the civil war -- his father respects his son's conscience in making that choice while his mother deplores it. The acting gets impressive when Josh returns from the war having killed a man in self-defense and weeps when he tells his father what he did. It was a supporting role for Perkins, but a good one, and Gary Cooper as a Quaker was also impressive.

He did marry and they had two sons ... www.nytimes.com/1992/09/16/arts/anthony-perkins-s-wife-tells-of-2-years-of-secrecy.html

@gcjerryusc WHAT! WHAT AN INACCURATE STATEMENT!

@gcjerryusc - You're a moron. A flaming one at that.

She made a comment once that if you asked Ronnie what time it was he would tell you how the clock was made.

@@m.e.d.7997 That's the Irish in him. I'm also Irish, and we love to talk! My Mom calls it "the gift of gab". I think it's rather a curse.

@@piustwelfth I got the impression Jane Wyman did not like that quality in him. Long-winded.He and Nancy always seemed happy though

@@m.e.d.7997 He liked to tell stories which is exactly what actors are doing. Strange. Probably she wanted to be the center of attention

They never make fun of Jersey accents. That’s rude

Did I detect some subtle flirting between Perkins and the fetching Charles Reece, the Atlas missile inspector, possibly two way?

@@OctoberArt66 I thought exactly the same thing.

@@OctoberArt66 that’s what I thought! Lol

No, they just shook hands.

Why would any of the panelists need or want hay in or near their homes?

Ronald Reagan thought so too.........

And the audience tittered.

And I think Tony Perkins too, after John mentioned weightlifting. He did after all say he was thinking about it ;-)

Groucho broke the deadlock with it several episodes earlier and made it 'ok'. They didn't bat an eyelid. Even then, prior to him a male mystery guest (can't remember who) many many episodes ago said it and there was a bristle of discomfort....but again, it made it 'ok'. OH!! I've just realised you mean the word 'heterosexual'. I thought you meant 'hell'.

And a very intelligent man as well.

James Fox and she got the academy award without saying a word!!

James Fox • Me,Too!

James Fox - saw her old movie the other night, Johnny Belinda, Jane played a deaf & mute farm girl, it was poignant movie, j really liked it

@@jolenaagapisou3803 Think she won an Academy Award

She looks stunning here!!

1959-60 Arlene was gorgeous. She was always attractive but those years, just wow.

And a wee button pug nose!

Jane Wyman publicly stated her absence of regret from her decision to divorce Ronald Reagan, primarily because his talking politics all the time got to her. It is highly unlikely in any event that she ever would have been First Lady -- it was the influence of Nancy's father and his associates that turned Reagan toward the conservative cause and a career in elective politics.

@@preppysocks209 well, that's not true. No-one could make up Ronald Reagan's mind for him, especially when it came to politics. And he was already President of the Screen actors guild when he met Nancy. He became a conservative after battling the communists in Hollywood, and moved further to the right during his time as corporate spokesman for General Electric Theater.

@@preppysocks209 If him talking Politics really is the main reason for the divorce, that's evidence that they never belonged together in the first place. Nancy and Ronald are two people who were meant to be. A real true love ❤️.

Pollyanna was a flop in its day? That'sso surprising, it's such a well made movie with great star performances by Jane Wyman and Haley Mills and a host of wonderful Disney character actors lending support

in this show, they do not consider plant life as being alive. only animals are alive. outside of this show, you are correct, hay was once a living grass.

Thanks Crypt Keeper, keep us posted

You know way too much

I THOUGHT THE SAME THING. But it didn't get there anyway. Well, Dorothy DID get it.

- Me too.

Yes, she remained friendly with Fred Karger's family after the breakup, and supposedly was dining at a restaurant where, coincidentally, Karger and Jane Wyman were having their wedding reception and she crashed it just to spoil Jane Wyman's big day. But Karger was with MM before anyone thought she would go anywhere, when she was signed for six months to Columbia in 1948 or so, and she was doing her only movie there, a true "B" picture ever there was one, Ladies of the Chorus, and he was assigned as her singing coach. She met her longtime acting coach, Natasha Lytess, in the same period, and Lytess claimed that she rescued MM from one of her earliest suicide attempts, after she had been dropped by both Columbia and Fred Karger. He had a son from a previous marriage and he specifically told MM that he couldn't see her as a stepmother to his son, which devastated her, since she loved children and wanted to be a mother almost as much as she wanted to be an actress.

Yes, it's all in his eyes. Hitch knew the score.

She was an investigative journalist as well. Her deductive skills were certainly quiet high. Plus given her experience as a journalist she seems to have developed a good mix of intuition and real knowledge. She's able to make non-linear leaps of thought very well which helps immensely in a show like WML.

Dorothy was ALWAYS like a dog on a bone. She was determined to figure it out!

She guessed Jane Wyman way too fast.

Or be a good husband and father

Jane was so cute and pretty, and a quick wit in those early films. She, Glenda, Jean, Joan and Ginger were my favorites.

Dov BarLeib Incorrect and so is Wikipedia. By definition hay is the dead, desiccated byproduct of grass or other such herbaceous life. Saying hay use to be alive is not hay, it’s grass or something else. By definition for it to be hay, it must be dead, dedicated and separated from the root system. If it’s alive, it’s not hay. It’s grass or something else, alive. Wiki is incorrect. As a forensic scientist, I have had a good bit of botanical training so I am going to stick to be more technical. Like an asteroid, meteor, and meteorite are the same rock depending on its location. Technicality is all that ever matters.

+Doc Lee Yes, but this was not their reasoning: as they've made clear elsewhere they consider only animals to have been alive!

@@doclee8755 Anything that is dead used to be alive. The fact that you give it a new name once it is dead doesn't change that. To use your example, a meteorite was a meteor that hit the ground. A big rock that was never a meteor is not a meteorite.

@@jackkomisar458 You are incorrect. Upon death there are several biological and biochemical changes that take place...and that only occurs once death occurs. That changes the properties of the material in question. Your analogy about the space rock is incorrect because whether it’s an asteroid, meteor, or meteorite the composition does NOT change, only the location of the space rock. It’s still the same composite materials either in the Kupier or asteroid belt and then al the way to earth. So that’s an incorrect analogy such the hay has some compositional changes that takes place after life ceases, like most biological organisms.

@@doclee8755 You are the one who initiated the meteor analogy. Anyway, I understand that there are biochemical changes when something dies. But it had to have been alive in order to die. If you don't want to admit this, you must say that every time a panelist asks if something has ever been alive, the guest must say "no". I admit that the connection between the product and the living thing can be so remote that one would properly not answer "yes". For example, a road has never been alive, even though it is made from asphalt that is derived from petroleum that came from plants that died millions of years ago. But when there is a direct, obvious, tangible relationship between the living thing and what it becomes when it dies, as grass is to hay, then it is correct to say that it was once alive. And there would be no nutritional value in hay if it had never been alive.

Lois Simmons I've been watching from the beginning. I'm SURE he's said 'enter and sign in please' often prior to this episode. Would've sworn he has. No?

@@davidsanderson5918 I also watched from the beginning and as I said, this was the first time I noticed him saying it that particular way. Could I have missed one? Possibly. The only way to know for sure is to go back and watch them again, which is not on my agenda right now.

@@davidsanderson5918: I thought he always said "enter and sign in please."

They get a lot of cues from the audience also with their reaction to the questions. Sometimes I would prefer the audience not do that because they help the panelists too much.

Yeah, Dorothy's strained explanation for how she guessed Jane Wyman made no sense at all.

I think they have a sixth sense.

@@Cosmo-Kramer didnt make any sense to me

DK was an investigative reporter besides being a Broadway columnist.

- I didn't think Arlene slurred her speech. She sounded like she always did.

She sounded perfectly normal to me.

Raymond Curry - yrs she does, but she’s as big as a horse - lol

Disagree

Yes. Also, Mr. Reese's remark to Mr. Perkins, "Well why didn't you start on that trail,we won't have ended so fast," sounds like a kind of come on in "code". Whether Mr. Reese was wearing a ring or not, I think he was flirting with Perkins.

Frank Lloyd Wright said he could fix it when he was a guest, but I guess they didn't take him up on it!

Imagine how epically funny that line would've been had the Justice of The Peace innocently said it! It would've had everyone in the studio in stitches!

Civil War supplier Hathaway, adopted an eye patch gentleman wearing a dapper button down dress shirt as their distinguished Logo.

@@dcasper8514 that logo and shirt store or factory for many many years, not just Civil War. May still be around for all I know

John didn't book the guests, he was just a puppet

Being friends with many people from different states, they still have those accents.

The justice of the peace from Arkansas has manners and accent that are distinct from those of the panel, you'd think she is from another country. As someone who move to North America recently, I appreciate this show because it helps me understand today's American society a little bit better.

Definitely. But then and now, the many different regional accents are NOT represented or portrayed in public things such as media/television. This is the case even more today.