🙂

I mean calling it an alliance isn't really accurate because they recognized the soveirty of the Caliph, leader of Islam, who had soft power over their suzerainees who also payed "tax"

Yes

​@@Kermatrix ?

Djibouti

@@yomamamisfat what do you mean Djibouti?

@@Land_of_Punt punt

Same this would be cool

Great idea we really need that as a people it would gives us a sense of pride especially for the young kids

THAT WOULD BE HELLA FLY!!! 💯👊🏿

How do you think they got afro Turks

Why would it impact that in any significant way?

Man stop with victim propaganda, the ones giving Arabs slaves were black Muslims themselves, this narrative that blacks been getting dominanted since time immoral is Ludacris, the word slave comes from slav, who were the most sold during the Islamic Golden age

Arabic are original black people, since at the beginning of time it was only one color and only one language. The correct way is European-Arabic.

It's should also be noted that Arabic is a language.

That applies everywhere not just africa

Ottomans were muslims

What about north Africa

​@@dkgamers1385go back to Turkey or Bulgaria or Italy

What does a history have to do weigh skin color everyone got there own ethnicity and stop this European race thing

We are not black we are African

no its not we arent black we are african. if your american your black. but africans aren't black. africans have there own country language and history. "black" is a offensive word used in American history.

Lol, the peoples living in Anatolia before or after the arrival of the Turks were not black. In the 15th and 16th centuries most of Anatolia was Turkish and the Turks were of Caucasian and Central Asian origin.

Kanem Bornu

@@Capta1nAfrica appreciate you

The Bahri Dynasty was actually a mesh of local indigenous Egyptian and mostly Saharan, Nubian, Zanj/Azanian, Nilotic, Central Sudanian from Central Sahel and Western Sudanian (West African Sahelian) soldier-sl*ves, eunuchs and circonspect sl*ves wotu an even smaller minority of them being Circassians, Eastern European, Turkic or from Balkans-- so much so that Egyptian nativist nationalists doesn't even consider them an indigenous dynasty and claims that their people basically recovered their power lost in Egypt since the falls of Cleopatra and of Zenobia some 2,000 years ago with Nasser and Sadat. It was _hardly_ composed of autochtonous elements. As much claiming that the Lagid Dynasty of Egypt was indigenous because their last reigning ruler (Cleopatra VII) was officially recognized by both the Egyptian priesthood and the nationalists as one, thanks to her maternal heritage (her natural mother wasn't Ptolemy Auletes's wife-cousin Cleopatra VI, but his Thebean concubine and courtesan Ankha, who was a daughter or descendant of the indigenous "anti-king" of Thebaid "Paious" II, son of Harsiesi-- and a descendant of Nectanebo II. She equally was Arsinoe IV's natural mother) .

@@ptolemeeselenion1542 you have a reference to where you stated the bahri dynasties recovered power lost during Cleopatras rule?

@@vnolan633 no im specifically speaking on what's known as the Bahri dynasty of Islam that ruled after the Ayyubid Dynasty which was consisted of Nile Valley men. "Their name "Bahriyya" means 'of the river', referring to the location of their original settlement on Al-Rodah Island in the Nile (Nahr al-Nil) in Medieval Cairo[a] at the castle of Al-Rodah which was built by the Ayyubid Sultan as-Salih Ayyub.[3][b]"

The Ottomans supported the Dervish State of Somalia as did the Germans.

They were but unfortunately in this period Ottoman power was declining so they supported Somali freedom fighters by giving firearms.

Muslims at the time were not one entity, the kingdom of zanzibar was on the African East Coast, the video is talking about ottoman and central africa

The ottomans had African slaves! If they where Muslim or not! Religion is not an excuse!

@@joemenrollins I'm simply differentiate between both entities, and the majority of slaves in the ottoman empire were from what is now known as East european countries, mostly white slaves.

That’s is true most where Slavic! The European expansion would not have happened had the ottomans continued! Also Salim the Grim Ottoman Emperor had not died suddenly they could have kept Alandulisa or re took it!

@@joemenrollins yes that would make them busy instead of colonising the whole world, LOL

It was not colonization it was annexation.

@@TheAmrthe2nd It was colonialism it’s not annexation the Turks are not natives of continental Africa. No African land belongs to turkey, so why did the invade it?

@@AT-gu8by they invaded it because they can, do you think because north africa is in africa, that means the Zulu empire for example has more right to it than the ottoman- in term of old expansion rules not modern sovereignties of course - because Zulu empire is in Africa, Africa is a geographical term, africa is not one country and Africans are not one nation, Europeans are all white they never claimed they are one nation or Europe is one country, anyway it was technically an annexation not colonisation.

@@TheAmrthe2nd They invaded it cause they can? That says a lot about you and them then!…Before the Berlin conference Africa was one land mass without borders and countries, the Turks invaded in the 16th century, it’s not their land. You wouldn’t be saying this nonsense if it had been Africans invaded the Ottoman Empire! Btw Europeans have practiced white supremacy throughout the globe.The Turks colonized a land that’s not theirs.

@@AT-gu8by don’t judge history with todays norms. African kingdoms were conquering their neighbours. Just like Asians and Europeans were conquering. Turkiye is a lot closer to North Africa then west or South African are so don’t blame them for getting there first and being powerful enough to do it.

They are turks that is different race, from central Asia

@@TheAmrthe2nd that's a lie Turkey was conquered by people from Turkmenistan

They are a turkic people, like the kazakhs or the turkmen.

@@elo6550 that's still the Caucuses Region

@@kingwise2074 no we turks are central asians