When Nashorns Hunted T-34s : Panzer Ace Albert Ernst's Unforgettable Feat at Vitebsk

  Рет қаралды 729,318

FactBytes

FactBytes

10 ай бұрын

Albert Ernst was a German anti-tank commander who rose to prominence during WWII as the leading Nashorn Panzer ace.
He started using the powerful Nashorn in 1943. With this vehicle, he accomplished amazing things, particularly in defense of the Belarusians, earning him the nickname "The Tiger of Vitebsk."
His efficiency in battle earned him the Knight's Cross for destroying 55 enemy tanks.

Пікірлер: 656
@lurkingturkey7882
@lurkingturkey7882 10 ай бұрын
the 88mm anti-everything gun
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 10 ай бұрын
That was a 88mmL71 and not 88mmL56. Much more powerful and deadly gun in 1943. 88mmL71 were mounted on Nashorns, Ferdinands, Jagdpanthers and King Tigers...and also were a anti-tank guns.
@jonowens460
@jonowens460 10 ай бұрын
Rokk n Roll😂❤
@wirelessone2986
@wirelessone2986 10 ай бұрын
​@@AKUJIVALDOAre you saying in 43 the L71 was more powerful or the L56?
@pkanne6057
@pkanne6057 10 ай бұрын
@@wirelessone2986L71 definitiv 🎉
@winter15motivation44
@winter15motivation44 9 ай бұрын
Infantry??
@jpmtlhead39
@jpmtlhead39 10 ай бұрын
The Nashorn used the 88 mm Pak 43, the same used on the KingTiger. The Shell had twice the propellant than the 88 mm shell used by the Tiger l. Was the most Powerfull AT gun of war. A real Beast.
@Absaalookemensch
@Absaalookemensch 10 ай бұрын
Correct. It's like comparing a .30 Carbine cartridge to an AK-47 cartridge. Both are .30 caliber, but the chamber size is much larger for the 7.62x39 AK-47 cartridge.
@kiowhatta1
@kiowhatta1 10 ай бұрын
It used the 88mm Pak 43/1 L/71 and was lucky enough to receive sufficient tungsten carbide cored round, the Pzgr. 40/43, was capable of penetrating 190 mm of rolled steel armour at a 30° angle of impact at a distance of 1,000 m.
@kiowhatta1
@kiowhatta1 10 ай бұрын
Despite only 494 vehicles being produced as a stopgap in 1943 before production switched to the jagdpanzer IV, they still managed to create six Schwere panzerJäger Abteilungen with 45 vehicles each. Having built a 1/35 scale model it is truly an awesome machine despite its armour vulnerability.
@kiowhatta1
@kiowhatta1 10 ай бұрын
Well the Tiger I had a modified 88mm KwK 36 L/56 gun modeled on the Flak 36 which comparatively was slightly inferior to the larger 88mm KwK 43 L/71 mounted on the Tiger II and the Jagdpanther, Hornisse/Nashorn and Ferdinand/Elefant Panzerjäger‘s.
@jpmtlhead39
@jpmtlhead39 10 ай бұрын
@@kiowhatta1 The Nashorn hold the Record for the longest tank kill of the war . Almost 5 kms away he knock out a T-34/85. The sheer power of that gun had no match since is introduction on the Battlefield until the end of the war.
@forstevo
@forstevo 10 ай бұрын
I can't remember how many times I've reread Panzer Aces, but Albert Ernst's story has always been my favorite.
@Rebellpanzer
@Rebellpanzer 10 ай бұрын
Probably the same as me, this guy was a 1st rate soldier and a good man
@couchwarrior2449
@couchwarrior2449 10 ай бұрын
I have read Infantry Aces. Great book.
@freddieclark
@freddieclark 10 ай бұрын
Yes, a reasonably good book. Its a pity that Kurowski was such a nazi apologist and resorted to embellishment and outright fabrication in many of his works. many of his books focused on "hero-making" at the expense of historical truth.
@panzerivausfg4062
@panzerivausfg4062 10 ай бұрын
I started the book two weeks ago but I'm still on Becke... Albert Ernt is the last one, starting in page 472
@nicktozie6685
@nicktozie6685 10 ай бұрын
Incredible warrior
@Kingmick58
@Kingmick58 Ай бұрын
I'd never heard of the Nashorn until now. Thanks for posting. From the old Aussie.
@eshelly4205
@eshelly4205 10 ай бұрын
My Opa was a Panzerjager. He was in the 43rd Abteilung 1 company in the 8th Panzer Division. His vehicle was the Marder (which you can see in the opening scene of the video). He ended up in the Panzerjager IV L/70 towards the end of the war. He said his unit “borrowed” a Hetzer that never found its way home.
@wirelessone2986
@wirelessone2986 9 ай бұрын
Did they take it from another unit?Never found its way back was it destroyed?
@eshelly4205
@eshelly4205 9 ай бұрын
@@wirelessone2986 I’m not sure. I have a photo of it. I couldn’t find it on the equipment allocation for Panzerjager 43 Abt. Maybe someone can shed light. It’s a very good question
@wirelessone2986
@wirelessone2986 9 ай бұрын
@@eshelly4205 Well alot of the detail is lost after they die..my grandad was 3RD AD 83RD RECON and there is sooo much I would like to ask him
@eshelly4205
@eshelly4205 9 ай бұрын
@@wirelessone2986 absolutely my friend . I just wish I asked better questions when he was alive
@nathangillispie51
@nathangillispie51 8 ай бұрын
Probably like it was in korea for my dad. Marines stole equipment from the army when they needed it.
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle 10 ай бұрын
0:23 nashorn and marder in same frame ! Very cool to see
@Slamraptor
@Slamraptor 9 ай бұрын
The size difference is insane. Nice shot.
@vapormissile
@vapormissile 3 ай бұрын
​@@SlamraptorPzJg-1 wants to play
@clausbohm9807
@clausbohm9807 10 ай бұрын
Patience was everything to that commander.
@sonsofthewestredwhiteblue5317
@sonsofthewestredwhiteblue5317 9 ай бұрын
They say that ‘patience is a virtue’…. I guess when you’re smack bang amidst the most hellish mechanised warfare humanity could devise to that point and the consolation prize for ‘getting it wrong’ may well be an AP suppository which ruins you and your crews day with blinding sheets of molten steal as an appetiser. I’d max out my virtue stats in advance if were he too.
@kiowhatta1
@kiowhatta1 10 ай бұрын
The Nashorn was built on the III/IV Geschützwagen (as was the Hummel ) which married parts from both vehicles to make it a Sonderkraftfahrzeug ( special purpose vehicle ).
@JanHoellwarth
@JanHoellwarth 10 ай бұрын
Literally every German armored vehicle was designated a “Sonderkraftfahrzeug”.
@Furzkampfbomber
@Furzkampfbomber 10 ай бұрын
@@JanHoellwarth Almost every vehicle build for the Wehrmacht was called 'Sonderkraftfahrzeug', armored or not.
@RobertoHernandez-cw1jn
@RobertoHernandez-cw1jn 9 ай бұрын
Germans and their way of bunching multiple words in order to make one long word.
@cgross82
@cgross82 10 ай бұрын
The correct German pronunciation is “naz-horn”, which means “nose horn”, which is the German name for the rhinoceros. Yes, the Germans named it the rhinoceros, or rhino, presumably because the 88mm gun stuck out so far in front of the chassis. It could also have been because a charging rhino is so dangerous and deadly. Anyway, it is NOT pronounced like the English “sh” sound, as in “shape”.
@petermcgoldrick3872
@petermcgoldrick3872 10 ай бұрын
The Nashorn was named as such - or, rather, re-named - on Hitler's order, as he deemed its original suggestive name insufficiently aggressive. Its original such name was "Hornisse", or "Hornet", in line with certain other German armoured SPGs - e.g., Wespe (Wasp), Hummel (Bumblebee), Heuschreke (Grasshopper), & Grille (Cricket).
@cgross82
@cgross82 10 ай бұрын
@@petermcgoldrick3872 Yes, I can’t imagine that Hitler was too pleased with “Cricket”, LOL!
@mikepette4422
@mikepette4422 10 ай бұрын
yes i assume its a robot but its hurting my ears when is says Nash Horn lol
@dhss333
@dhss333 10 ай бұрын
The Brits pronunciation is ridiculous: "Shtalin, Geshtapo."
@cgross82
@cgross82 10 ай бұрын
@@dhss333 Actually, the Germans pronounce it “Geshtapo”. Anytime you see “st” in German it is pronounced “sht”.
@homunculous007
@homunculous007 10 ай бұрын
We scale modelers thank you immensely.
@adrianariaratnam5817
@adrianariaratnam5817 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for this very informative vid. Never knew much about the Nashorn, let alone the ace mentioned. Learned a lot. 👍
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 10 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@bardstables8909
@bardstables8909 10 ай бұрын
I've always thought these were some of the coolest tank destroyers of WWII.
@asullivan4047
@asullivan4047 10 ай бұрын
Interesting and informative. Excellent photography job enabling viewers to better understand what/whom the orator was describing. Professional class A research project!!! Special thanks to the veteran tank crews. Sharing personal information/combat experiences making this documentary more authentic and possible. Fighting/perishing/surviving knowing certain death/debilitating wounds were often times possible. Yet still advanced forward regardless of the consequences. That's true grit style determination to succeed.
@Steve_Farwalker
@Steve_Farwalker 10 ай бұрын
There was a lot of WWII footage here that I've never seen before and I've seen quite a bit. Well done.
@opoxious1592
@opoxious1592 9 ай бұрын
I was also very suprised. Fantastic footage.
@randallturner9094
@randallturner9094 9 ай бұрын
Quite the mish-mash of vehicles in here though.
@marcoherrmann1820
@marcoherrmann1820 10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the Update
@chrishewitt4220
@chrishewitt4220 10 ай бұрын
Did exactly this in a game of Squad Leader in the 80s... I took out a whole column of T-34s with my three Nashorn! It was a great game that one...
@somerandomvertebrate9262
@somerandomvertebrate9262 10 ай бұрын
Indeed it was. 👍
@kevinedwards7206
@kevinedwards7206 10 ай бұрын
i played squad leader.. and advanced squad lead.. great games❤
@ottobaym01488
@ottobaym01488 10 ай бұрын
В реальной жизни все не так 😂😂😂
@ourshelties7649
@ourshelties7649 10 ай бұрын
I still have all the squad leader games, and a few other Avalon Hill games.
@randallturner9094
@randallturner9094 9 ай бұрын
@@ottobaym01488ASL was pretty close, Otto. They got the “feel” right. Disclaimer - I was a cadet at West Point, we preferred chart driven miniature rules but the squad leader games were close, and led to fewer “you can’t see that!” arguments.
@disme2072
@disme2072 9 ай бұрын
Thanks guys for making these great videos!
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 9 ай бұрын
Glad you like them!
@ShanGamer1981
@ShanGamer1981 10 ай бұрын
Never seen that footage of nashorn
@chrisdrake447
@chrisdrake447 10 ай бұрын
Good to see some different/new footage of the Nashorn and other AFVs. Some channels keep rehashing the same tank footage (eg a field full of King Tigers on manoeuvres), whether it’s relevant to the narrative or not. Nice job here, although not so keen on the AI voiceover.
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 10 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍
@michaelfrey7373
@michaelfrey7373 10 ай бұрын
Such a great Channel here !
@alextakacs768
@alextakacs768 10 ай бұрын
How a video with so much information even exsist is beyond me!! How the old Film and text became aviable is almost impossible!! So much details!!
@stargazer1744
@stargazer1744 5 ай бұрын
I often think the same when watching all this incredible WW2 footage we would have never seen if it hadn't been for this beautiful tool called Internet, and You Tube within it ! I keep downloading as many documentaries as I can , foreseeing the unfortunate possibility of Internet dissapearing from the face of Earth one of these days.... Just in case, you know.
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
... so many* details.
@Floofrer
@Floofrer 10 ай бұрын
Nashorn also took down the early deployed Pershing, just proves 88 was truly unrivaled at that time.
@winter15motivation44
@winter15motivation44 9 ай бұрын
After all perishing was twice as armored as compere to Sherman tank German guns can easily blow up them in theroy in single shot in turret by panzer4
@jamesvetter4033
@jamesvetter4033 9 ай бұрын
was it a Nashorn or a Hetzer, which took down the Pershing...or did they both take down a Pershing or two? thanks!
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
@@winter15motivation44 After all, Pershing* was armoured twice as much compared* to Sherman. German guns could* easily blow them up in theory* ...
@ColinFreeman-kh9us
@ColinFreeman-kh9us 8 ай бұрын
Great footage, awesome narration.
@joeavent5554
@joeavent5554 5 ай бұрын
Prounced as Nas-horn vs Nash-orn.
@HappiKarafuru
@HappiKarafuru 10 ай бұрын
Hummel and Nashorn An often forgotten Tank destroyer in ww2, overshadowed by something like Jagtiger, JagPanther and stugs
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 9 ай бұрын
The Germans had two types of tank destroyer. Panzerjaeger like the Nashorn which had light armour and hopefully a big gun and jagdpanzer which had heavy armour. The first jagpanzer was the Jagdpanzer IV. It was at first to be called “StuG IV never art” to emphasises the KwK 42 L70 gun but Guadarian had them renamed. There seems to have ben an argument over whether the artillery branch would continue to receive these or whether they were allocated to the panzerwaffe.
@robertmaybeth3434
@robertmaybeth3434 7 ай бұрын
Fascinating documentary story-telling here OP, also I think the editing job is right on the money as well. And repeatedly during the war on the Ostfront, a smaller number of German tanks were able to run large formations of T-34's in circles and blow them up one by one... so seldom is there a flattering picture of the expertise of Russian tank units big or small. But the Russian T-34, while an excellent tank overall, had many designed in impediments for most of the war. Maybe one T-34 in 5 had a radio, the rest had to play follow the leader. Also in the T-34, the turret floor did not revolve with the turret. This meant every time the turret was turned, the commander and gunner remained stationary and had to scootch in their seats, all the while trying to load, aim and fire! The T-34 saved Russia but of course, it was far from perfect.
@stargazer1744
@stargazer1744 5 ай бұрын
Saved Russia...but bro, at what cost ! They must have lost thousands and thousands of them ! And - as usual with the Soviets - all the losses figures released by them after the war don't even remotely reflect the true figures they keep under 7 keys in the Kremlin's vaults !
@MrKawaltd750
@MrKawaltd750 10 ай бұрын
Insightful look into the deployment of early TD's.
@slimchancetoo
@slimchancetoo 10 ай бұрын
Vitebsk, notable in my mind for two other things -- During World War II, the city came under Nazi German occupation (11 July 1941 - 26 June 1944). During Operation Barbarossa, 22,000 Jews, or 58% of Vitebsk's Jewish population, managed to successfully evacuate to the interior of the Soviet Union, thus saving themselves from the impending Holocaust. Much of the old city was destroyed in the ensuing battles between the Germans and Red Army soldiers. Most of the remaining local Jews perished in the Vitebsk Ghetto massacre of October 1941. The Soviets recaptured the city during the June 1944 Vitebsk-Orsha Offensive, as part of Operation Bagration. Also, Vitebsk is where the Red Army intelligence services first discovered German archives detailing the heroic defence by its garrison of the Brest Fortress --- which was one of the places that took the brunt of the opening offensive of Barbarossa. Previous to this STAVKA in Moscow was unaware that the Brest Fortress held out much longer than they had previously thought.
@yungcaco1443
@yungcaco1443 10 ай бұрын
Great video 👍🏻
@rocistone6570
@rocistone6570 10 ай бұрын
Albert Ernst would live to be 73, He passed away in 1986. Why do you not include this sort of information?
@frederickrohrbacher8606
@frederickrohrbacher8606 7 ай бұрын
Great account of the battle!
@Spartan902
@Spartan902 10 ай бұрын
Man these guys had balls of steel! To sit in there in an open top TD with the engine off while shells rain down. It's incredible that when a round penetrates a tank, not everyone will necessarily die and they can fight on. There is a movie called T-34 Iron Fury where a round goes through and kills the bow gunner but they get it together and fight on and win.
@gerhardswihla1099
@gerhardswihla1099 10 ай бұрын
At close range the 8,8-cm-KwK 43 could easily over penetrade a T-34. The explosive fillment in the tank shell did explode after it passed the enemy tank armor twice and didn't explode inside the tank as intended resulting in much lesser damage.
@Spartan902
@Spartan902 10 ай бұрын
@@gerhardswihla1099 It was from a Panzer III I think firing a 75mm KwK 37.
@gerhardswihla1099
@gerhardswihla1099 10 ай бұрын
@@Spartan902 How do you come to this conclusion? Mine references is to the Russian night attack where two t-34 responded firing beside being hit by the 88. Didn't noticed that a Panzer III Ausf. N was mentioned.
@Spartan902
@Spartan902 10 ай бұрын
@@gerhardswihla1099 Sorry mate but I was referring to the tank in the movie I mentioned. Not on the documentary.
@stargazer1744
@stargazer1744 5 ай бұрын
Bolshevist propaganda...
@customdioramics7961
@customdioramics7961 10 ай бұрын
When well employed and with good tactics the Hornisse was an outstanding weapon.
@coachhannah2403
@coachhannah2403 10 ай бұрын
Vulnerable to artillery and air
@tyree9055
@tyree9055 10 ай бұрын
​@@coachhannah2403Infantry, too, if they get close enough.
@coachhannah2403
@coachhannah2403 10 ай бұрын
@@tyree9055 - Yes, thanks.
@tekis0
@tekis0 5 ай бұрын
Exciting narration had me in suspense.
@conceptalfa
@conceptalfa 10 ай бұрын
Please observe is pronounced Nas-horn, not Nash-horn!!! Otherwise my favorite tank!!!
@darnaby4110
@darnaby4110 5 ай бұрын
Observe this video is in English.
@jjayyoung7335
@jjayyoung7335 8 ай бұрын
The long barreled 88mm on the Nashhorns, Kraut tank killers were absolutely lethal to all Allied tanks at what deadly out to 3 000 meters.
@chriscarbaugh3936
@chriscarbaugh3936 10 ай бұрын
First shot kill from 1,800m. !!
@pat5882
@pat5882 10 ай бұрын
I believe a Nashorn scored the only kill against a Pershing tank on the western front. Was early 1945.
@chriscarbaugh3936
@chriscarbaugh3936 10 ай бұрын
Seem to recall that as well
@danielmccoy8875
@danielmccoy8875 10 ай бұрын
Uhhhh by that time most of the German armor was out of fuel or destroyed..the Nashhorn was deployed heavily on the Italian front..My uncle talked about the GERMAN Artillery
@pat5882
@pat5882 10 ай бұрын
@@danielmccoy8875 uhhhh, KZfaq: Mark Felton Productions Nashorn vs Pershing Germany 1945
@tattoojack1969
@tattoojack1969 10 ай бұрын
According to Warfare History Network a Pershing of the 3rd Armored Division, a T26E3 named Fireball, was hit by three rounds from a Tiger and was knocked out on February 26 1945 in Elsdorf. Two crewmen were killed and the tank was later recovered, repaired, and returned to action.
@mikepette4422
@mikepette4422 10 ай бұрын
allegedly a Jagdtiger killed one too but there is some dispute as to what actually destroyed the Pershing many claimed it was a Pak Gun of some sort because there was no sign of the killer when the area where the shot came from was searched. I'm not even sure if this story is true or made up but I read it a few years back somewhere.
@tomkrzyt
@tomkrzyt 9 ай бұрын
Great job!
@fredgarv79
@fredgarv79 10 ай бұрын
I can not imagine the cold, maybe they just got used to it after a while
@stephenwalsh1332triumph
@stephenwalsh1332triumph 7 ай бұрын
The German was a excellent warrior with there technology and fighting nouse they were a good foe!
@oleriis-vestergaard6844
@oleriis-vestergaard6844 10 ай бұрын
The tall siloette and thin Armor made it a dangerous vehicles in more than one way - the other dangerous thing was the 88/ l 71 gun - a real killer
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 9 ай бұрын
Low silhouette wasn’t any worse than the Showman and some of the American tank destroyers. It was still almost twice that of a StuG
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
The tall silhouette* made it a dangerous vehicle*
@MGB-learning
@MGB-learning 10 ай бұрын
Great video
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the visit
@Hoang-88
@Hoang-88 10 ай бұрын
Lesson learned. I been wondering why i had been so bad at WarThunder lately
@Ouwkackemann
@Ouwkackemann 5 ай бұрын
Not like an Elephant, but like a Nashorn. ; )
@TTTT-oc4eb
@TTTT-oc4eb 10 ай бұрын
It had a hybrid Panzer III/IV chassis. The Hummel (150 mm gun) used the same chassis.
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 9 ай бұрын
The Hummel due to its 150mm gun was considered more valuable than the Nashorn. Little known is that the Germans did deploy APDS ammunition. The 150mm Gan could find something equivalent to in 88 mm FLAK 37 shell and, 105 mm guns goodbye something equal to 7.5 cm PAK 40. These didn’t use tungsten just ordinary steel.
@wbnc66
@wbnc66 10 ай бұрын
"Those things could put a round in your hip pocket. ' a comment on the accuracy of the 88mm from an old fiend who had the extreme bad luck to be under fire from them.
@patricksodders3745
@patricksodders3745 10 ай бұрын
I heard the same comment from a WW2 vet in 1970, they could put a round in your hip pocket
@wbnc66
@wbnc66 10 ай бұрын
@@patricksodders3745 it was probably their largest sniper rifle in inventory
@snacks1184
@snacks1184 10 ай бұрын
Records show on average a 88 crew would fire 20 rounds to get one kill.
@wbnc66
@wbnc66 10 ай бұрын
@@snacks1184 That might be accurate . I was just repeating as first hand account I got from a fellow who had been on the wrong side of the weapon.
@bohemianh
@bohemianh 8 ай бұрын
God Bless Him!
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
Who is "him"?
@richardbullwood5941
@richardbullwood5941 10 ай бұрын
Fun fact. The average lifespan of a Russian t-34 was not even one full tank of fuel. That's right, on average, t-34s were destroyed or incapacitated via breakdown on average before they consumed one full tank of diesel
@charlesdexterbrewer6586
@charlesdexterbrewer6586 4 ай бұрын
I saw an 88 at the WWII museum, it was overwhelming.
@user-ds4tt3ts7o
@user-ds4tt3ts7o 5 ай бұрын
Great footage. The only remark - Vitebsk was not a village but a medium-sized town by that time.
@stargazer1744
@stargazer1744 5 ай бұрын
I think Vitebsk is located in Bielarus, although the narrator doesn't mention where.
@somerandomvertebrate9262
@somerandomvertebrate9262 10 ай бұрын
Vitebsk isn't a village. It's a town/city.
@mohammedsaysrashid3587
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 10 ай бұрын
Flake 88 mm gun recorded a great and successfully printed finger designed gun during WW2
@alexhubble
@alexhubble 4 ай бұрын
Well, quite.
@markbeyea4063
@markbeyea4063 10 ай бұрын
Interesting piece, even if the narration was awkward and poorly delivered. At least it was AI.
@tombrunner8181
@tombrunner8181 9 ай бұрын
I wish I was half as much of a man as my grandfathers were
@edyichim2878
@edyichim2878 10 ай бұрын
nice
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 10 ай бұрын
Thanks
@khrystree9233
@khrystree9233 5 ай бұрын
Pz IV engine could not be described as powerful.....but great video 👏 with good narrative.
@hashteraksgage3281
@hashteraksgage3281 5 ай бұрын
The tank had a good power to weight ratio, that's why the engine was powerful.
@mikesbaseballcards
@mikesbaseballcards 10 ай бұрын
Fascinating account!!
@CarLos-yi7ne
@CarLos-yi7ne 10 ай бұрын
"Unstoppable"? It is really light armoured and have a very high silhouette. They only had a chance at long range and/or in ambush position. Still a formidable weapon when used with its drawbacks in mind. There is one running Nashorn in the Netherlands (one of only three complete ones still existing).
@Cult1022
@Cult1022 10 ай бұрын
As you say, consider your advantages and disadvantages. Do the same with your adversarys. Together this result in tactical guide how to engage. And if you can force it upon the enemy, you will prevail.
@annedejong1040
@annedejong1040 10 ай бұрын
It's not the Flak36/37 or Tiger 1's 88 mm, it's the Kwk43, like in the Jagdpanther or Königstiger
@Freedomfred939
@Freedomfred939 10 ай бұрын
Great AFV but too few were made. Also had no overhead protection, the VT fuse in an artillery barrage would have been a serious emotional event for the crew.
@randallturner9094
@randallturner9094 9 ай бұрын
First use of the VT fuse for artillery barrages was by the US in Battle of the Bulge, late 1944. It was never available to Soviet or German land forces in WW2, and don’t think operational for non-Western AA though Germans had some experimental designs. Just sayin’. Of course all open topped TD’s were vulnerable. Trade off is improved crew access to the gun, ie, rate of fire.
@NedkaRokonokova
@NedkaRokonokova Ай бұрын
I appreciate the work that people put into making these videos possible. My chief complaint is that I'm sick of AI voices. I would rather hear a human being fumble and bumble, delivering the best narration he/she can. Maybe other people will agree with me when I say a genuine effort sounds better than a computer. I would be happy to lend my voice.
@dschoas
@dschoas 10 ай бұрын
just a small correction: Nashorn is the German name for rinoceros, and its pronounced nas horn, where letters s and h are pronounced distinguishly, and not as sh.
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
... are pronounced separate* from each other. distinguish = tell apart from each other, distinguished = outstanding/special, "distinguishly" = does not exist.
@elmocotton3078
@elmocotton3078 7 ай бұрын
My grandfather died at Auschwitz. He fell out of the guard tower.
@hashteraksgage3281
@hashteraksgage3281 5 ай бұрын
Mine died from typhus
@kampfgruppepeiper501
@kampfgruppepeiper501 6 күн бұрын
Fun fact: Michael Wittman’s Stug was nicknamed “buzzard” as well
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
A "prehistoric elephant" is called a mammoth (Mammut in German). A Nashorn (rhinoceros) is a contemporary animal. And "S" and "H" are always pronounced separately in German. What is "SH" in Englisch is spelled "SCH" in German.
@Evo836
@Evo836 10 ай бұрын
The Nashorn has the longest tank kill record.
@geroldfirl
@geroldfirl 10 ай бұрын
How was the gun aimed side to side?
@Zach-bu6dv
@Zach-bu6dv 10 ай бұрын
​@geroldfirl they would have to move the tank left to right entirely, since it was a fixed turret.
@geroldfirl
@geroldfirl 10 ай бұрын
@@Zach-bu6dv Seems like it would be hard to get any kind of accuracy with such a crude aiming mechanism.
@Zach-bu6dv
@Zach-bu6dv 10 ай бұрын
@geroldfirl in a fixed defense and ambushes is where the excel. They just have to traverse the tracks, but most assault guns or fixed turrets like that, have a tiny bit of room they can move the barrel. Just depends. They're actually very useful. And they still use fixed turrets like that today. Maybe not always for tank to tank engagements though...
@geroldfirl
@geroldfirl 10 ай бұрын
@@Zach-bu6dv Yes I would think a fine adjustment for barrel traverse in addition to the coarse adjust using the tracks would be necessary for precise gunnery.
@johnkeane1419
@johnkeane1419 9 ай бұрын
I would say the Nashorn resembles a triceratops rather than an elephant. Otherwise, excellent work.
@tanknimation986
@tanknimation986 10 ай бұрын
My time to shine
@ron9320
@ron9320 8 ай бұрын
It’s not NASH HORN, it’s NAS HORN, translated Nose Horn, the German word for Rhino.
@kiralight2929
@kiralight2929 9 ай бұрын
Outstanding work. Shame the didn't have better leadership.
@rogercude1459
@rogercude1459 10 ай бұрын
Strangely the Germans thought the Nashorn was not a Successful design, could have made thousands of em instead of big Cats.
@manningjackson2723
@manningjackson2723 4 ай бұрын
Great video mate👍🇦🇺👍
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 4 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍
@serbe3416
@serbe3416 9 ай бұрын
When u as a WoT player find out the nashorn was actually an op tank😂
@RobertoHernandez-cw1jn
@RobertoHernandez-cw1jn 9 ай бұрын
Every german tank in WoT is mediocre compared to everyone else, fielding experimental trash and such thay is OP compared to the obsolete germans. .
@crowbirdryuell
@crowbirdryuell 9 ай бұрын
russian bias after all
@sirhoopalot1
@sirhoopalot1 8 ай бұрын
Years ago, the Nashorn was a pretty damn good TD in WoT. Still have my highest score and 8 kills in it. Nowadays, it's crap because WoT never updates its older tanks, they just keep adding clown cars, rocket engines, and autoloaders.
@SweatyFeetGirl
@SweatyFeetGirl 7 ай бұрын
russian bias? far from the truth. @@crowbirdryuell
@MarcioDascal
@MarcioDascal 10 ай бұрын
Monstro
@Martinit0
@Martinit0 7 ай бұрын
A: What shall we call our new tank destroyer? Admittedly, it looks a bit like an elephant. B: Ok, then let's call it rhino.
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
The Elefant was the name of the later versions of the Ferdinand tank destroyer, and the word the authors of this narration were looking for is "mammoth". Still completely different from a rhinoceros.
@TheYeti308
@TheYeti308 10 ай бұрын
There are several stories of Herr Ernst and his men .
@damianousley8833
@damianousley8833 10 ай бұрын
Less than 500 Nashorn were ever produced. Like everything with late war Germany not enough produced, not enough spares, not enough fuel, not enough aircover. When knocked out or abandoned rarely recovered and lost.
@user-vp9cb2oz9v
@user-vp9cb2oz9v 4 ай бұрын
wonder weapons.....even the MG42 was a wonder weapon of Arian Genius...Yamato Japanese are of ancient Arian Royal Pure Bloods
@royalwulf6241
@royalwulf6241 5 ай бұрын
hell ya
@rowdied9829
@rowdied9829 10 ай бұрын
Don't you mean prehistoric Rhino not Elephant?
@alexhubble
@alexhubble 4 ай бұрын
Anyone else here love the Nashorn on World of Tanks? I did!
@perpetualgrin5804
@perpetualgrin5804 10 ай бұрын
I like to see the white uniforms, they look cool and clean.
@saxonost7
@saxonost7 10 ай бұрын
The Nashorn looked like an elephant.. which is odd for something called a Rhino.....
@milanbalazik1847
@milanbalazik1847 9 ай бұрын
Vitebsk, one of the oldest and fourth-largest Belarus city (fouded 974 AD) is not a village, nor was in 1943.
@blxtothis
@blxtothis 10 ай бұрын
I know that it is impossible to have actual film footage of thee encounters and it’s wonderful to having moving pictures suggesting the events unfolding but as the video can’t match the narrative and that the film used shows winter conditions followed immediately by non snowy footage, it does become a bit confusing. Full marks though for a well presented piece and thanks for making the effort to source the archives for the material shown.
@laf43777
@laf43777 8 ай бұрын
They were the best
@mikeromney4712
@mikeromney4712 10 ай бұрын
Nas - Horn.....Nose - horn....:)
@alvarvillalongamarch3894
@alvarvillalongamarch3894 4 ай бұрын
Though their gun was awesome,they stood really unprotected to shelling or airbursts,and their armour could ony protect them from small infantry projectiles.Not a mean feat of courage.Distance and sloping was their main advantage.Very useful in open European plains.Mostly useless at close quarters.Can't but stand in awe to their courage,marksmanship and professionalism.
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
Speaking of professionalism: You show none in your punctuation.* Commas and fullstops are always followed by a space.
@Ralphieboy
@Ralphieboy 10 ай бұрын
Naz-horn. As in "nose horn", their word for "rhinoceros". The Germans use "sch" to represent the sybillant sound like "Schule" or "Schuh" or "Schmuck"
@michaelbetsch9700
@michaelbetsch9700 4 ай бұрын
At the start of video a t34 was running along it sounded like it was runing very smooth purring right along
@einundsiebenziger5488
@einundsiebenziger5488 2 ай бұрын
... like it was running* very smoothly*
@roybennett9284
@roybennett9284 10 ай бұрын
Fantastic clip thanks, kind regards roy Bennett from Wollongong Australia
@FactBytes
@FactBytes 10 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@paulfolding9021
@paulfolding9021 10 ай бұрын
AI commentary ?
@Kzerty
@Kzerty 7 ай бұрын
Very well documented, written and synchronised with pictures ! You would have been hired by one of propaganda reals, depending on your nationality. Congratulation for good job !
@mobilegames3369
@mobilegames3369 3 ай бұрын
Nas-Horn
@ryleeculla5570
@ryleeculla5570 2 ай бұрын
I mistook this thing as a mobile howitzer cause it looks like the Hummel
@331SVTCobra
@331SVTCobra 8 ай бұрын
Trivia: "Nashorn" is German for "rhino". Get it? One big horn sticking out the front to hurt people.
@johanstahl1497
@johanstahl1497 10 ай бұрын
Ernst's feat in here is featured in PSX game Panzer Front. You can play as him (Falken Unit) with the Adler/Eagle unit, although the Buzzard is nowhere to be found.
@donrolo6499
@donrolo6499 10 ай бұрын
Bussard
@ottobaym01488
@ottobaym01488 10 ай бұрын
Какой подвиг он нацист😂
@hededcdn
@hededcdn 8 ай бұрын
Loved that game!
@sonsofthewestredwhiteblue5317
@sonsofthewestredwhiteblue5317 9 ай бұрын
“The Importance of being Ernst”
@jasonbarnes1541
@jasonbarnes1541 10 ай бұрын
I suspect the success of these Nshorns led to developing the Jagdpanther
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 10 ай бұрын
The hybrid Panzer IV/III chasis was also used for the Hummel 150mm howitzer. This vehicle received priority so Nashorn despite its success was produced sporadically. Hitler personally favored the Jagdpanzer IV with 7.5cm L70 to take over the role of the Nashorn. It had a lower profile, much heavier Armour but its mobility was less due to it being nose heavy and the 7.5cm L70 less powerful than the 8.8cm L71. However the 7.5cm L70 needed to be not much more than 500m to destroy an IS-2 so the 8.8cm L71 was essential in the long term hence I think you are right the JagdPanther gave a way of getting the 8.8cm L71 onto a chassis that was much cheaper than the King Tiger.
Rampaging Tiger of Villers-Bocage
11:52
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Пробую самое сладкое вещество во Вселенной
00:41
Always be more smart #shorts
00:32
Jin and Hattie
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
small vs big hoop #tiktok
00:12
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
Sigma Girl Past #funny #sigma #viral
00:20
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
D-Day | The 32 Men Who Unlocked Omaha Beach (WW2 Documentary)
19:11
Battle Guide
Рет қаралды 512 М.
When a Lone Panzer III Took on an Entire Soviet Battalion
14:20
FactBytes
Рет қаралды 123 М.
Tiger vs 50 Tanks!?
19:35
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
The reason Germany failed on D-Day (Ft. Jonathan Ferguson)
23:26
Imperial War Museums
Рет қаралды 858 М.
German Glass Cannon, the Nashorn | Cursed by Design
15:51
ConeOfArc
Рет қаралды 282 М.
D-Day Tanks: Operation Overlord's Strangest Tanks
31:18
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 502 М.
18. Egypt - Fall of the Pharaohs
3:58:24
Fall of Civilizations
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
Пробую самое сладкое вещество во Вселенной
00:41