Italy?

Protestants have a problem: Martin Luther took it upon himself to remove several books from the Bible which is why a protestant bible has 66 books, and a Catholic bible 73 books...

Catholics are not Christians

I started reading Douy Rheims only in English

Not true the Christian Bible is the only truth

Catholicism is nonsense and untrue Jesus is the way and the truth and if a person doesn't know the Bible and Jesus as their Lord and savior then they don't know God your in my prayers only Jesus can save a persons soul not catholicism

@@Jesusislord4569 Dylan, Saw your comment. I, as a practicing Catholic, agree with you on the need to read the Bible often in order to be inspired with its taching. On the other hand, I must emphasize that our Lord Jesus Christ founded one Eklessia or Church to whom He asked to be perfectly one. Nowhere did our Lord hinted of division based on personal reading of inspired writings. Remember, our Lord setup a Magisterium with Peter as its head to feed and tend His flock in his absence. Moreover, our Lord prayed personally for Peter for the strengthening of his faith in order to guide His one Church. Ask yourself: Did our Lord's prayers for the leader of His Church stopped with Peter in the first century? The answer is NOT! Our Lord, as you know, went on to say in: Matthew 28:19-20 19. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit, 20. teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I AM WITH YOU ALWAYS, UNTIL THE END OF THE AGE.” Therefore, the promise given to Peter is carried forward to all his future successors for the benefit of all Christians down to the ages, in order to remain "perfectly one" just as Jesus wanted. My friend, even though I respect your personsl discernment regarding your beliefs and practices, I pray that one day we will all be one just as our Lord Jesus Christ asked. May God bless your discernment.

@@joecastillo8798 you can't know Jesus if your a Catholic because catholicism is completely different from Christianity only Christians such as myself can truly know Jesus so in reality catholicism is false

"The gospel according to Matthew" wouldn't have to mean he specifically wrote it but that his journey with Jesus and His teachings that Matthew passed on to others were written down and thus attributed to him.

The problem is there is absolutely no evidence of this. Every single full copy of Matthew we ever had attributes it to Matthew, who was one of the Apostles who could definitely write.

What church did Mathew found and start?

Catholics fight back against the Word of God and the Finished work of the cross.

How do Paul's letters conflict with the words of Jesus?

@@Henry-eh2jk Jesus tells believers to keep the Law of God. Paul tells believers to not keep the Law of God; therefore, the two conflict. Paul, who wrote 5% of the Bible, accounts for 95% of the issues.

@@KeenanModica Nope. Read the Bible.

No on what? Are you saying Paul taught the same thing as Jesus? @@Henry-eh2jk

@@KeenanModica You don't understand the Old Covenant made with Abraham and the New Covenant made with Jesus. The words of Jesus are in COMPLETE agreement with the letters of Paul. Keep reading from the Bible. Maybe you will understand. Regardless, you are making yourself look stupid with your ignorance. You don't understand and have no grounds or right to, wrongly, accuse Paul. The word satan literally means accuser. A false accuser. Why are you falsely accusing Paul?

Uhhhh it's not a 'Fact' dude.

Everything is either believed, made up, or perceived as first-hand as factual information, sometimes all three! Perhaps, Usually all three.... Who knows!

@@bethanienaylor Bethanie, You may want to visit "The Decree of Damasus" on line. There you will discover the entire Canon of Scripture as well as who, with full divine authority, designated it as "The Word of God" in 382AD. God bless.

@@joecastillo8798 thank you!

@@bethanienaylor You are welcome. God bless.

The New Testament was written by Jews. None of the Books of the Bible were written by catholics

The writers of the New Testament were Jews! The Bible is a Jewish book. The Catholic Church compiled it and purged it of its Jewishness.

Jesus Matt 16 18-19

@@geoffjs That passage says nothing about Jesus starting the catholic church. Paradoxically, Jesus destroys the catholic church in Revelation chapter 18

@@geoffjs Any other guesses?

Constantine the roman empire, council of nicaea. From paganism to Christianity later on become Roman catholic In this sign I will conquer

@@BikeyTheVlogger Distorted fact. Constantine LEGALIZED christianity, he did not found it.

No one uses his translation, because it was so full of errors.

the church compiled it and thru the holy spirit determind which books were canonical and approved the canon. not every book in the nt was immediatly recognized as inspired

@@wjm5972 Did catholics write the Bible?

No. catholics did not write the Bible

No

jewish converts , the 1st catholics@@casey8726

For the first 300 years of Christianity, there was no Bible as we know it today. Christians had the Old Testament Septuagint, and literally hundreds of other books from which to choose. The Catholic Church realized early on that she had to decide which of these books were inspired and which ones weren't. The debates raged between theologians, Bishops, and Church Fathers, for several centuries as to which books were inspired and which ones weren't. In the meantime, several Church Councils or Synods, were convened to deal with the matter, notably, Rome in 382, Hippo in 393, and Carthage in 397 and 419. The debates sometimes became bitter on both sides. One of the most famous was between St. Jerome, who felt the seven books were not canonical, and St. Augustine who said they were. Protestants who write about this will invariably mention St. Jerome and his opposition, and conveniently omit the support of St. Augustine. I must point out here that Church Father's writings are not infallible statements, and their arguments are merely reflections of their own private opinions. When some say St. Jerome was against the inclusion of the seven books, they are merely showing his personal opinion of them. Everyone is entitled to his own opinion. However, A PERSONS PRIVATE OPINION DOES NOT CHANGE THE TRUTH AT ALL. There are always three sides to every story, this side, that side, and the side of truth. Whether Jerome's position, or Augustine's position was the correct position, had to be settled by a third party, and that third party was the Catholic Church. Now the story had a dramatic change, as the Pope stepped in to settle the matter. In concurrence with the opinion of St. Augustine, and being prompted by the Holy Spirit, Pope St. Damasus I, at the Council of Rome in 382, issued a decree appropriately called, "The Decree of Damasus", in which he listed the canonical books of both the Old and New Testaments. He then asked St. Jerome to use this canon and to write a new Bible translation which included an Old Testament of 46 books, which were all in the Septuagint, and a New Testament of 27 books. ROME HAD SPOKEN, THE ISSUE WAS SETTLED. "THE CHURCH RECOGNIZED ITS IMAGE IN THE INSPIRED BOOKS OF THE BIBLE. THAT IS HOW IT DETERMINED THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE🤦‍♀️

Bs you are so full of crap

@@lois2997 Prove it. You always have something rotten to say. Prove your point.

@@lois2997 Which books in the Bible are written by catholics? Which books in the Bible are written to catholics? Which books in the Bible talk about the catholics and the catholic church? What books in the Bible use the word Catholic?

@@lois2997 You are the one who is full of anger. Why are you so afraid?

@@casey8726Catholic just means “universal”. Is is the One, Holy, UNIVERSAL and Apostolic church founded by Jesus. When the Bible talks about the church such as “the church is the pillar and bulwark of truth” in 1Timothy 3:15 it is referring to the only church that existed at that time which is now called the Catholic Church. It’s an historical fact.

The holy spirit involved during the writing process, the gospel of mark even though it was written by mark, but the source of the story came from peter. So they can assure that it was the truth. The same goes with other gospels.

@@MyPoincare What documentation suggests this is the case?

You can find it in Eusebius' book, Historia Ecclesiastica (Book iii. No 39, verse 15), Eusebius of Caesarea provides both information about Papias and quotations from Papias. Papias (60 - 130 AD) was the bishop of Hierapolis, he was one of Apostle John's (15 - 100 AD) disciples along with Polycarp. This is also confirmed by Irenaeus (Polycarp's disciple) Meanwhile the Eusebius (260 - 339 AD) was bishop of Caesarea, he wrote several book related to Apostles, their disciples, and their teachings. "(15) “This also the presbyter said: Mark, having become the interpreter of Peter, wrote down accurately, though not in order, whatsoever he remembered of the things said or done by Christ. For he neither heard the Lord nor followed him, but afterward, as I said, he followed Peter, who adapted his teaching to the needs of his hearers, but with no intention of giving a connected account of the Lord’s discourses, so that Mark committed no error while he thus wrote some things as he remembered them. For he was careful of one thing, not to omit any of the things which he had heard, and not to state any of them falsely.” These things are related by Papias concerning Mark." (Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica, Book iii. No 39, verse 15) or in original text written as below : ‘ [15] τοῦθ̓ ὁ πρεσβύτερος ἔλεγεν: Μάρκος μὲν ἑρμηνευτὴς Πέτρου γενόμενος, ὅσα ἐμνημόνευσεν, ἀκριβῶς ἔγραψεν, οὐ μέντοι τάξει, τὰ ὑπὸ τοῦ κυρίου ἢ λεχθέντα ἢ πραχθέντα. οὔτε γὰρ ἤκουσεν τοῦ κυρίου οὔτε παρηκολούθησεν αὐτῷ, ὕστερον δέ, ὡς ἔφην, Πέτρῳ: ὃς πρὸς τὰς χρείας ἐποιεῖτο τὰς διδασκαλίας, ἀλλ̓ οὐχ ὥσπερ σύνταξιν τῶν κυριακῶν ποιούμενος λογίων, ὥστε οὐδὲν ἥμαρτεν Μάρκος οὕτως ἔνια γράψας ὡς ἀπεμνημόνευσεν. ἑνὸς γὰρ ἐποιήσατο πρόνοιαν, τοῦ μηδὲν ὧν ἤκουσεν παραλιπεῖν ἢ ψεύσασθαί τι ἐν αὐτοῖς.’

@@MyPoincare awesome. Thanks for the info! I will totally investigate. I read Eusebius in college but have forgotten the bulk of what I got from it.

@@cinnamondan4984 no problem

🤔

@@namaspetelo2144 Yes.

There is more than one way to teach Scripture: Passion plays, drama, song, poetry, hymns, story-telling, high crosses with biblical scenes embellishing them, paintings, stained glass windows... These tools were used when people were illiterate or unable to afford a bible. They are still used.

@@m.forrestal5893 out of the list you have given by which or what way you are taught scriptures? Jesus took the way to give gospel by the word of mouth.

People are so brainwashed by religion and they need to repent and come to Jesus because Christianity isn't a religion Christianity is the truth and catholicism is a religion it's completely false you need to repent and come to Jesus before it's too late

@@Jesusislord4569 LOL

@@brentbrandon1062 it's not funny

@@brentbrandon1062 I'm being serious religion is evil and people need to stay away from it and they need to come to Jesus and I hope that you do too friend God bless you

Mercy rose Jesus will never be silenced

Jesus is believed to have spoken both Aramaic along with Hebrew. It is thought he may have known several languages because he worked in a cosmopolitan city.

@@karincoll5581 Jesus is God. Language is never an issue.

@@francissweeney7318 Yes. Jesus is God.

give us examples, oh great seer....

​@@glennlanham6309How are you getting to Heaven?

​@@casey8726No one gets to Heaven except through Christ's blood. Acts 2:38-Repent AND BE BAPTIZED, every one of you, for the forgiveness of your sins, in Jesus' name.

@@casey8726 Through the Blood of Christ, did you find another way?

@@casey8726 Acts 2:38 is very clear: repent and be baptized.

Because they are religious, not spiritual

Jesus founded One True Church Matt 16 18-19 Early followers were Christian. No other churches, they are sects ie pretenders lacking the fullness of the CC

4TH CENTURY THE FIRST USE OF THE WORD "BIBLE": It came from the Greek word "biblos" which means the inner bark of the papyrus, paper-reed, from which paper was originally made, in Egypt. The Latin form "Biblia" spelled with a capital letter, came to mean "the Book of Books," "The Book" by way of pre-eminence, the inspired Book, etc. The Holy Scriptures were first called the Bible by St. Chrysostom, the Catholic Archbishop of Constantinople, in the 4th century. (12)😎😎

@@biblealone9201 finally some that knows I've asked a few pastors and they can't tell me ,so why was Jesus missing for 18 years ? And is Divine , Divinity and Divination not the same? And why don't people believe in reincarnation if Jesus said Elijah returned as John the Baptist, (Luke 1:17) we are all spirit living in a human body or was Jesus lying? And why go and pray in a church or a temple if out body is a temple, did Jesus not say don't be like the hypocrites who love to pray standing so others can see them , but go in your room and pray to the father so that he can see you, what did Jesus mean in (John 8:42-46) and why would God allow a girl that's gets raped to marry her rapists? And if the Bible God is loving and forgiving, why did he have innocent woman and children kill (Numbers 31:17-18) and they were to keep all virgin girls for themselves, when the 10 commandments say you shall not kill and why is there slavery in the Bible ? Does the Bible not contradict itself? I was a Christian man but the spirit of God showed me things that are not of God in the Bible now I am a spiritual person

@@JoseSanchez-zq8kg Read the bible with the context that God's revelation of Himself is progressive. If God in the OT is vengeful and punishing is that because God is unloving? OR is it because humankind (collective consciousness) is slow and dim witted?

@@tco13v what did Jesus say in (John 8:42-46) or is Jesus lying about this it is written and Jesus does not want humans to worship him it is written in (John 5:41) in (Rev 19:10) and in (Rev 22:9) and what God would be ok with rape of a woman (Deuteronomy 22:28-29) is that your god ? The real God is a loving and forgiving God , and he is not a jealous punishing God that puts fear in us , fear is of the devil not from God

@@tco13v with all respect I believe in Jesus but he was not this religious figure religion makes him to be , why did the pharisees hated him ? For speak the truth he got killed he was teaching spirituality not religion, listen if Jesus was a divine being he had to have used divinity and divination is it not the same thing ? But religion wants us blinded to the truth , the old testament did the Angel Raphael not show tobit how to do a ritual using the fish's heart, liver and gallbladders, to get rid of an evil spirit, and to heal tobias from blindness that sound like divination to me

Bs you are so jealous you whiny prot trolls . Oh yes we gave you the New Testament

@@lois2997 Yes catholics did not start the Bible. Why are you so afraid? Catholics had nothing to do with the writing of the New Testament.

Did you not watch the video?

​@@lois2997 Jesus loves the devil mocks, insults and attacks

Jesus gave us the One True Church Matt 16 18-19 Plenty of evidence that the CC codified the Bible in 382 at Council of Rome

Worth nothing? you said?

@blwtheblue - I'd like some of that whatever you're smokin' Holmes!!! You can't discern what he's educating you on?? You can only think of dog feces??? @@#$%^&* 🤣😆🤣🤣

So you clearly are not a Christian.

Wah but Catholics wah wah I love my heretic Luther wah

The rosary and Mary are catholic symbols that contradict what the Word of God teaches.

catholics do not teach that she is