Support the channel and buy a shirt www.mishasguns.com/ Pedersoli's amazing products www.davide-pedersoli.com/en
Пікірлер: 276
@mishas_guns3 ай бұрын
Support the channel and buy a shirt - www.mishasguns.com/
@MihajlovicKS2 ай бұрын
❤❤❤😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉💕💞💓💗💖💝💘
@FR33B0AT2 ай бұрын
What do I get if I win the boxing match? 🤔
@Corndogvr12 ай бұрын
What song is that intro song🤔🤔
@andrewsims412324 күн бұрын
Typical American racist crap , no surprises there 😆
@ThePerfectRed2 ай бұрын
The French musket has a huge advantage that every soldier would honor during field duty - easily removable barrel bands. Today we tend to just run a few cleaning patches through the barrel, but back then the standard military procedure was to dismount the barrel.
@jeffreyrobinson3555Ай бұрын
You don’t need to disassemble a brown bess barrel to clean, it does take more care but not hard. All my black powder barrels are pinned and I only remove them to wax the barrel channel every few years
@druisteenАй бұрын
Soldier weren't alowed to , the barrel band gave advantage for the bayonet , less stress .
@jeffreyrobinson3555Ай бұрын
@@druisteen interesting pov All my ml are pinned. Has this been tested, I wonder if stabbing could exert enough force to dislocate a pin. Or four pins in this case. Your POV is going to give me some food for thought👍
@mathieushifera135Ай бұрын
The other big advantage was the way the stock was shaped made aiming down sights more ergonomic
@ro1-fles3 ай бұрын
A paper cartridge would be cooler and faster, but it is still cool
@gasmaskloner61802 ай бұрын
And more time period acquit
@ArtyfierАй бұрын
Turns out, it's more accurate the way they did it since the powder is finer (so better) and you can measure it a lot better
@Beuwen_The_Dragon2 ай бұрын
The Ball ‘bouncing down the barrel” is a myth. If your ball is bouncing down the barrel, you are shooting a much too small ball.. Muskets aren’t less accurate because the ‘ball bounces down the barrel”, but because the ball has no rotation.
@jeanladoire41412 ай бұрын
Yeah it's just about lack of stabilisation... Imagine if a bullet bounced around in a rifled barrel lmao
@ichibear43952 ай бұрын
@@jeanladoire4141 "Hey there is a 0.0000000000000001% chance the bullet might bounce, you sure you wanna kill a geese?" "Yea" "ok" "3, 2, 1 *Explodes*" best way to lose a hand
@aidenarkhamАй бұрын
And more drag
@imperialus1Ай бұрын
If we are picking nits, the technical definition of musket could include rifling. Hence the term "rifled musket" used to describe weapons like the Springfield 1861. It wasn't until we started seeing breach loaders with rifled barrels becoming commonplace that they started to drop the term 'musket'.
@Winaska28 күн бұрын
the british purposefully shot a smaller calibre ball that did indeed have wiggle room going down the barrel....
@jeffreyrobinson35552 ай бұрын
A British soldier was expected to load in fifteen seconds or less
@shawnsmith9512Ай бұрын
They were expected to be able to make 3 shots a minute under fire. I have practiced and it is only moderately difficult to do the 15 second standard. But 20 seconds while under fire is a bit more difficult I would believe, though I am not going to test it out.
@jeffreyrobinson3555Ай бұрын
@@shawnsmith9512 I watched Ted Spring historian and author of several books on the French and Indian wars, get off twenty three shots in three minutes forty five seconds. The last three his cartridge box was empty and friends beside him were handing him cartridges
@dsan8742Ай бұрын
@@jeffreyrobinson3555 Yeah on the range, when being shot at expect the average ROF to 2 rounds per minute
@Winaska28 күн бұрын
with a cartridge, yes
@nuancolar73042 ай бұрын
When they started rifling them in the early 1800s, the Enfield (from England) was considered one of the finest rifles in the world. Both the Union and Confederacy bought and imported them prior to and during the early years of the war. It wasn't until Springfield got cranked up that it became the standard issue for Union troops.
@druisteenАй бұрын
Actually we are not talking about the enfield musket
@skvader4187Ай бұрын
The Enfield was made in 1853.
@asuka7309Ай бұрын
They didn't start rifling them until 1851, which isn't the early 1800s. And the Enfield rifle used in the civil war was the P53, which was a Belgian design that won in British trials. It had nothing to do with the older british muskets or their 1851 rifle-musket conversions.
@Dam_ramsa__3 ай бұрын
I prefer the Italian Carcano
@AntonioLucas-yz1de3 ай бұрын
J.k agree
@ParutoTH3 ай бұрын
I dont think they made a musket That's a Charleville
@user-je9ce1rn7t2 ай бұрын
Yea
@FalkyRocket22222 ай бұрын
same but its in a different class so the muskets are still really cool
@user-vh8ce2yr5c2 ай бұрын
German Kar98k much better =)
@YesUncleSam3 ай бұрын
great job Misha&Patrick!
@talleman1Ай бұрын
Shot both the Bess and Charleville and both are great, but I like how the Bess feels.
@tomservo5347Ай бұрын
I learned an important trick to flintlocks-use black powder in the priming pan, FFF. Pyrodex grains are too large. The finer grained black powder in FFF will rapidly increase ignition time. You'll go from a 'click, swish, boom' to an instantaneous 'swish/boom'. English black flints are the best along with tempering the frizzen to achieve stronger sparks. A well-tuned flintlock is almost as fast as percussion.
@matteoorlandi8562 ай бұрын
i own one brown bess made by pedersoli and had the opportunity to talk a lot with the pedersoli's. they craft only quality rifles, pistols and muskets and the accuracy you can squeeze out from those guns is amazing, you can hit man torso sized targets up to 80 meters with the right load with those muskets... and with a lot of skill, of curse.
@robertheywood25532 ай бұрын
In stubborn retreat or in stately advance, From the Portugal coast to the cork-woods of Spain, She had puzzled some excellent Marshals of France Till none of them wanted to meet her again: But later, near Brussels, Napoleon - no less - Arranged for a Waterloo ball with Brown Bess.
@wargey3431Ай бұрын
As Wellington said to a lady at a ball when French officers potentially Marshall’s of France turned their back to him as a slight the lady apologised and he said don’t worry Ma’am I have seen their backs before
@AllAboutSurvival3 ай бұрын
It's not just about firepower; it's about understanding the ingenuity behind each musket and how they played a crucial role in shaping military history
@user-jq5nw8vp1b3 ай бұрын
Too bad I thought you guys were gonna use correct authentic Paper Cartridges for the musket.
@guaporeturns94722 ай бұрын
Yep too bad. Now go to your room and cry about it.
@damianalaniz1118Ай бұрын
Y’all should try the traditional military loading method used in battle
@Bobbymaccys2 ай бұрын
Muskets may be old but the *tsss- boom* they make when fired will never get old ❤
@Richard280112 ай бұрын
Great video guys. I'd like to see your 1 minute test with paper cartridges instead of powder cans.
@MFbastian3 ай бұрын
Misha's sometimes looks like Roman, GTA IV
@johngulyas6953 ай бұрын
Charleville, please
@kennethquinnies6023Ай бұрын
the French musket had a cheek indent in the musket behind the sight so the soldier could better aim his weapon
@AlexisLKАй бұрын
I'm not an expert of weaponry (more a history addict) but I know a lot of guys around my friends circles who are doing reenactment of Napoleonic era and also periods a bit before, very popular in my country, and the majority of the time, these guys are telling me that French weapons of that era were the best in the world, that's one of the many (hundreds) complex reasons why the French Army kicked the ass of the rest of Europe during Napoleonic Wars. In this era and in the majority of the Renaissance, second after French weaponry, is usually Italian that is remembered as the second best one. But yeah, basically, France was the first world power from medieval times to the Waterloo battle. From the moment of the defeat at the Waterloo battle and the symbolic and concrete fall of France from the 1st place on the podium, things drastically went in the wrong direction for France and the Anglo-Saxon took the lead. Things changed very quickly in the industrial era, and England became the leader because they were the first to embrace industrialization. That's one of the reasons that made the British Empire so strong during the 19th century until WW1. Then came the Americans and the Russians a bit later, around half of the 19th century. They both became very good at producing, good and reliable weapons during the 20th and 21th century. And here we are today, at pretty much the same stage, where 80% of the best weapons in the world of many different types, are usually made by Americans and Russians and the rest is usually a few very specifc exceptions from sometimes Europeans or Asians.
@iirainey2 ай бұрын
If it means anything, the French design was copied wayyyyy more. Also, Belgian copies were made and traded very widely in the 18th and 19th centuries. Even the Ottomans bought tens of thousands of them and they were used by some nations late into the 19th century.
@KroM2342 ай бұрын
US Springfield are pretty much Charlevilles!
@applepie9786Ай бұрын
Thats to be expected though with the French being the strongest continental power for many years with a large production capacity, while the British mainly focused on overseas colonies.
@jeffreyrobinson3555Ай бұрын
But we should note that armies armed with bess type guns more often won over those with French style
@inhocsignovinces1327Ай бұрын
@@jeffreyrobinson3555 Oh you should have studied it for years with a lot of sources to affirm this. We are all waiting all this hard work.
@jeffreyrobinson3555Ай бұрын
@@inhocsignovinces1327 well in-depth research might reveal some surprises, but how about the war of Spanish succession war of Austrian succession the seven years war, in general Brit’s armed with besses defeated the American Charleville armed troops though the American Revolution, the Napoleonic wars the war of 1812, where Americans were useing a charly knock off and pretty consistently lost to the Brits until the battle of New Orleans where civilian arms were pretty important. The German Potsdam was basically a bess and in the hands of German troops did pretty well. The Spanish during the peninsula campaign fought a lot of Spanish style charlies Besses would be in the hands of Mexicans during the Texas Revolution, but the Texicans were mostly fighting with civilian arms. Besses would meet Americans again during the Mexican war, but by then Americans had technological advantage, and Mexicans had very poor generalship. But even at a disadvantage the bess in the hands of Mexicans preformed real well.
@herrtalman3079Ай бұрын
Underrated opinion but i think the swedes had one hell of a musket
@nohrii023Ай бұрын
I am for the Austrian M1798 model. Also in our manual in this time period, we didn't turn the ramrod - they just charge the cartridge with the bottom of the ramrod because it's designed for it. :) It is said, but not what I personally can approve, that the Austrian M1798 Musket could get out more shots than the French model, less misfire. Also our loading manual from 1806 is way more comfortable.
@QwerYT48192 ай бұрын
You should try again with paper cartridges, you could just about half your reload time with your skill
@altechelghanforever99062 ай бұрын
Whose selling authentic musket paper cartridges, these days?
@brickinthebag2 ай бұрын
@@altechelghanforever9906You make your own. They’re not difficult
@altechelghanforever99062 ай бұрын
@@brickinthebag Ah yes, lemme just get a musket ball from my dorm room closet. 😅
@brickinthebag2 ай бұрын
If you have anything lead in your closet you could in theory melt it down lol. I'm just saying that since they already got musket balls for the video (although I'm sure they aren't using the correctly undersized rounds), then it wouldn't take too much more time to prepare cartridges. Either way, fun video.@@altechelghanforever9906
@Beuwen_The_Dragon2 ай бұрын
@@altechelghanforever9906 … You mean you don’t?
@SmokeThatShits2 ай бұрын
Muskets being HIGHLY inaccurate is a myth. Ofcourse they are not as accurate as modern rifles but for the ranges they were intended, they were pretty good.
@pingpong-dz6tiАй бұрын
You’re reloading the musket incredibly slow 😭 But good vid
@user-ul5ku8gc6w2 ай бұрын
Great job
@passionscouteauxnature90193 ай бұрын
Perfect 😊👍
@davidgray3321Ай бұрын
I love the cattle , beautiful animals.
@BrettsCorner92Ай бұрын
I believe that the military used the same powder to prime as in the musket. They used paper cartridges.
@lespocos53892 ай бұрын
When doing a time comparaison, you should voth start at the same time
@gotsloco18103 ай бұрын
How much antique muzzle loading propellant are you using in each? On watching again I notice the touch hole is low . This is leading to longer lock time. Mike Beliveau showed this problems several years ago with a Pedersoli several years a ago. I have several Pedersoli percussion rifles.
@STho2052 ай бұрын
Fun. A "musket" is any military longarm that is designed specifically for military use. Rifled musket, Carbine musket, musketoon (short chase musket) and these smoothbore long pattern "muskets" As these were the fundamental non specialized mass infantry arms they weretypically given no modifier name and simple"musket". It is fun to watch people of no legit military training (of the period) shoot these firearms. Holding a lb can of power with a pourer in your hand over a hot barrel...what couldgo wrong. Loading them with individual hunting or marksman methods like they were a civilian rifle or fowler is always a joy to watch over an eternity of time. The French musket is mechanically and manufacturing the better piece as you can break it down without specialty tools or gun skills. The British muskettequires a pin press to remove the barrel and is a bear to get back together...so only sergeants were trusted with the tool to break it down. Both have similar accuracy when used by the same shooter. The Bess you used(if original) is heavier. These replicas have fairly thick barrel walls. The originals were quite thin (both). The 1777 French model is a much later era pattern musket than the Bess offered as comparison. The better comparing might be a French 7 Years War era, but DP doesn't make one anymore.
@wargey3431Ай бұрын
And even amongst ‘long Muskets’ you have 2 types land service pattern and Naval Muskets the naval musket being in length between a musketoon normally issued to artillery and engineers and the Land Service musket issued to infantry I believe the india pattern Brown Bess then went as an intermediate length between both the LSP and the Naval
@wargey3431Ай бұрын
The same class of Navy and Army existed with pistols as well hence the Colt London Navy which was a naval pistol firing a smaller calibre than the Colt Army
@andyf4292Ай бұрын
wonder what they do to ballistics gel or the Paul Harrel meat target?
@AngryCrackbear3 ай бұрын
Zero boxing experience, out of shape, and definitely too short for a fair fight. But i gotta start somewhere on my path to knocking out either Paul brother.
@andyf4292Ай бұрын
historically 4-5 rounds a minute for the Bess
@kryten392 ай бұрын
well this'll be interesting since its something i've always wondered about this era since all the weapons were incredibly similar not like today where we have more complex engineering/ weaponry types to think about
@TFD1231Ай бұрын
There are Flintlock Rifles btw.
@hdykjeve3 ай бұрын
Super vidéo ! 👍🏻
@thebrowneyesofmandalore65243 ай бұрын
You’re colonial videos and shirts are the best! I love the humor! 😂 “Muskets”
@razzaus15702 ай бұрын
Imagine loading this thing in battle with rain and wind.😮
@ChiefYeager25 күн бұрын
It’s shorter if you use a pipe cartridge to load a musket
@haevyjnrАй бұрын
You should try doing 3 rounds in a minute. A well trained British soldier was capable of firing 3 rounds in a minute.
@SteveAubrey1762Ай бұрын
😅😅😅omydog! Those reloads were painfully slow! Patches!? Someone give those men paper cartridges!Ty for the Vivaldi to ease the pain though!😅😅😅
@Real11BangBangАй бұрын
I'm glad someone else noticed this
@edwardloomis887Ай бұрын
A musket is quieter than modern rifles because the balls they fire don't break the sound barrier exiting the weapon. Shoot an M-16A2 without hearing protection and be prepared for your hearing to be replaced to a high-pitched scream.
@Maverick96629 күн бұрын
Actually a Brown Bess musket has a muzzle velocity of about 500 m/s, well enough to break the sound barrier
@andyf4292Ай бұрын
wondering what the muzzle velocity and energy are?
@willam199225 күн бұрын
around 1000fts depending on the ball,gun used,and its powder load,and type
@JaredKaiser242 ай бұрын
Bite, pour, spit, tap, aim, fire. -Sharpe
@WWIIREBELАй бұрын
I had an 1842 Springfield by them. The stock was seriously heavy and looked sort of fat.. I took it to someone who specialized in civil war arms and he re-contoured the stock to a more accurate size and finish. Now it weighs an accurate 10 pounds, not 15,lol.
@ltdan28092 ай бұрын
rematch with paper cartridges
@jean-charlesblanc84542 ай бұрын
they did not use patches, they used paper cartridges the lead ball was wrapped into it, the ball was smaller than the barrel caliber, like for the French 17.5 mm versus 15 mm ball - as those two muskets are made by Davide Pedersoli, the winner must be Italy
@AngeloSantos-jh7jx3 ай бұрын
Muito bom essa competição 😂😂😂
@craftnight21172 ай бұрын
POV u and all the friends and enemies fighting zombies and one British and one frunch fighting who got the better musket
@Winaska28 күн бұрын
i know a few old boy park rangers who do in fact hunt with smoothbore brown besses and or the american 1798 Springfield
@eyzmin2 ай бұрын
a musket is a muzzle loader, a musket can be rifled, like the springfield 1855, which is both a rifle and a musket
@cassianbarker44152 ай бұрын
Neither, I prefer the Japanese Tanegashima Teppo all the way! (Great video BTW)
@mufffinman42032 ай бұрын
could you trade muskets and see how the times and accuracy compare. so like a best and worse case solider to wield the weapon like how bad they could be to how good they could be, you guys can reload but can you carry your gear whilst cramped and shots going off as if you was in a firing line.
@rexbarron48732 ай бұрын
Musket comes rom the Itialian word Mochetto which in old Italian is is a sort of Sparrowhawk. Arquebuses and muskets are really the same.
@benjaminjarrett9816Ай бұрын
No historic loading with paper cartridges?! How leisurely of you…
@victorwaddell6530Ай бұрын
Yes . In the 18th Century musketsmen carried boxes with pre-loaded paper cartriges . They bit off the bottom of the cartrige , dumped a few grains of powder into the flash pan , then rammed the rest of the cartrige down the barell . A well trained musketman could load and fire as many as six rounds per minute in ideal conditions , maybe three while in combat . I'm from South Carolina where there was a lot of fighting among the Redcoats , Continental soldiers, Loyalalist Militia , and Patriot Militia forces .
@scottyjordan9023Ай бұрын
If you pre loaded paper cartridges it would go quicker
@johngamba4823Ай бұрын
Americans who don’t know the difference between England and Britain! Clearly a well educated pair full of knowledge 😂
@user-pg2kj7ps7oАй бұрын
At least they got the flag correct! How many Times do you see the UJ and “England”.
@gregorpeters2 ай бұрын
Nice video, but unrealistic. Please take guns, black powder and in field made papier amunition in quality from 1806-1815 and you will see real differences. Old statistic and reports say that french "1777" have to be cleaned every 5-7 shots - Brown Bess was during fire fight much better and fired more that 10-12 shots well. The quality of french black powder was very bad. Britisch and allied troops didn't want to use captured french black powder for Brown-Bess, or preussian, so called "Kuhfuß" (cow feet) guns. Good trained infrantry man fired one shot in 20-25 sec. But you need paper cartriges ;-) And nobody could be so powerfull like infrantry of Alter Fritz. They fired as first all 3 lines in 5-7 sec. and started to reloade and when enemy french, austrian or russian take place to fire, the next preussian salvos came after 10-12 sec. No wonder that after this massive fire first lines in front of army of Friedrich der Große away. The inventor of this tactic was "der alter Dessauer". (Wikipedia). Napoleon Bonaparte die known how problematic "1777" was, so he changed tactic from attacks in lines to attacks in colons with 10-12 ore more lines. So french troops could fire faster, one salvo every 5 sec. with slow reloading. And cleaning of 1777 was not so problematic.
@charlesburgoyne-probyn60442 ай бұрын
Most reconstructions are a bit wide of the mark, the subtle issues such the powder quality although persons then would have been accomplished at doing this all on the quick
@DidierDidier-kc4nm2 ай бұрын
very interresting post 👍but in fact i read the quite opposite about the quality of prussian rifle compared to the 1777 the source is osprey and is from wesphalians oder saxons under french service , testified that the 1777 was better than the 1740 pattern Potzdam Musket, and even the prussian was the worst of all !and it s not mentionning why ! maybe you ve got some point about the powder quality ! but you ve got a channel called'' survive history ''where british reanectors mentioning that the 1777 is better than brown bess !however Im not myself a big expert in black powder gun and i never shot with the 1777 or 1740 one ,I just answer what i read ..About colonne tactic it is not not from Napoleon ,French used it many years before , even Maurice de saxe had it used by french infantry ! French always focused on elan and shock than fire for better and for worse.
@gregorpeters2 ай бұрын
@@DidierDidier-kc4nm Please don't forgett that Potsdam Arsenal ( building is still existing ) made better types of Potsdam Musket with many changes in style of 1777 . But production was Not so high. And many regiments used still very old Potsdam 1740, or got english Brawn Bess. Yes, handling of french 1777 is better as other guns from 1720-1850 era. But please fire 50-60 shots with bullets and black powder in quality of napoleonic wars from all types of guns. I believe that old reports of napoleonic veterans about troubles with french 1777 are right. Maximilian von Sachsen was great general. I saw many black powder weapons in KZfaq , but all people are using much better amunition like in old times !
@johnopp-re5wmАй бұрын
I need a musket
@maxk420Ай бұрын
1:47 ifykyk
@roberteastwood9886Ай бұрын
My understanding was that the Brown Bess used a bigger ball, so if the Brits captured French ammunition, they could still use it but if the French captured British ammunition it was no good to them. This may be from Sharpe!
@user-ul5ku8gc6w2 ай бұрын
Greag job
@user-et7rr6tu3hАй бұрын
U should alternate guns to see if there is an operator bias.
@zafbaydal9729Ай бұрын
i think its the same musket fire power if u put many gun powder inside the gun barrel and put 1 ball and shoot it maybe the fire range are longer and stronger penetration
@hammerofmariotos2 ай бұрын
The Prussian 1740 Potzdam or the 1770's era Brown Bess for my money are the best. Both used broad brass pipes as the returning slot for the rammer. You can return the rammer on a slight bend and the pipes will actually straighten it out and slide it back. The Charleville has this teeny little pinhole slot for the rammer, this makes it 100X harder to return rammers quickly during firing. Brown Bess is also noticeably lighter and the swell on the stock makes it very easy to handle and cast about when loading.
@adammessina61822 ай бұрын
How fast do those heavy balls travel in fps ya think 🤔 🤷♂️
@Beuwen_The_Dragon2 ай бұрын
Depending on how good your powder is and how much you use. Assuming a standard charge of 70-90 grains, your velocity could be as good as 17-1800 FPS, as ‘Meh” as 12-1400 FPS, or as absolutely lousy as 800-1100 FPS. Use good powder in a consistent measured charge.
@adammessina61822 ай бұрын
@@Beuwen_The_Dragon wow much faster then I thought 💭 thanks for the info man 👍🏻
@jeffreyrobinson35552 ай бұрын
Musket was specifically a military arm. Smoothbore civilian arms were called fowling pieces or fusils. Rifles had been built before muskets and were used in America during the Revolution
@wargey3431Ай бұрын
Fusils were an archaic name for the flintlock fusiliers carried Fusils to protect the artillery as carrying a matchlock near lots of loose powder was considered dangerous
@jeffreyrobinson3555Ай бұрын
@@wargey3431 early on. By mid eighteen century fusil was a light smoothbore such as the fusil de chase and trade fusil. Some times spelled fuze or fuzee Even today fusil is French term for civilian shotgun
@Corndogvr12 ай бұрын
What song is the song when you show the cows🤔😍🙂🥰😘
@FelixLaw-vm2siАй бұрын
British Grenadiers fife and drum
@Corndogvr1Ай бұрын
Thanks ❤
@afisto6647Ай бұрын
The Charleville who conquered Europe against the one who....who... was only dropped once.
@martyshane78682 ай бұрын
Коров от мух обрабатываете?
@guaporeturns94722 ай бұрын
Speed doesn’t matter if you can’t hit your target.
@helpmehelp3009Ай бұрын
Should have bought a Whitworth 6 sided cartridge RIFLE! Look it up boys!
@5jjt3 ай бұрын
How do you have over 5 million subs in under 11 months as a gun channel?
@user-et7rr6tu3hАй бұрын
A musket is essentially a shotgun.
@liukane91982 ай бұрын
Boo Cow: this happens all the times moo
@user-vl5wx4ji8n2 ай бұрын
The British could reload in about thirteen seconds……..
@Eham962 ай бұрын
Historically the charlivile was better than the brown bess
@BrokenIET2 ай бұрын
Depends on how you look at it. I think overall probably, they were a lot easier to maintain at least.
@Mmjk_122 ай бұрын
no it wasn't, the british one had a higher calibre, did more damage and because of that, could also use the French musketballs, the reverse isn't possible. The BB is also lighter and can fire more shots before needing to be cleaned.
@Eham962 ай бұрын
@@Mmjk_12 more damage 😂, no it didn’t-the brown bess ball might of been a little bigger but the French used better powder so the French musket balls travelled a lot faster and accurately and even then it DOESINT MATTER both will preform around the exact same when it comes to power and damage!!!, as for using French musket balls, you need a really tight fit for the gun to fire the musket ball-a French musket ball in a brown Bess is not a REALLY tight fit, so therefore I don’t think it would be all that possible and the British probably never did that, as for cleaning the musket the brown Bess MAY of not had to be cleaned as much but it would still take a TON of rounds for it to even start to affect the charlivile accuracy or reloading speed for battlefield standards it would still take a TON of rounds for that to even start to affect the accuracy or reloading speed of the charlivile therefore it wouldn’t matter and besides nobody is gonna stop in the middle of the battlefield to clean there musket especially when cleaning your charlivile/musket wouldn’t change anything endless you fired a ton of rounds
@ogukuo72Ай бұрын
Is it enough difference to make a difference? You decide.
@unangwatataro7215Ай бұрын
almost Sharpe 4 shots a minute
@SUMM3RYАй бұрын
Fun fact French Musket were used during the secession war by the confederate
@cunningwoodworksАй бұрын
Neither the French or British military of that era loaded patched round ball. They used paper cartridges.
@guaporeturns94722 ай бұрын
Charleville all day
@syborgcat3830Ай бұрын
This video really doesn’t do a great job of breaking the stigma that muskets are slow and inaccurate 😂
@elijahtidswell845715 күн бұрын
I prefer the m1 garand rifle
@Artyfier2 ай бұрын
Honestly, are paper cartridges more expensive or is there some hidden reason to why everybody uses a powder measurer, patch, and bullet separately?
@wargey3431Ай бұрын
More accurate to use your own hand measured powder and you can use finer power in the pan to spark up quicket
@ArtyfierАй бұрын
@@wargey3431 now that I that I think about it I guess paper cartridges are used more by reenactors and the powder and bullet are bought separately more by gun review channels
@gijoe508Ай бұрын
Clearly England, because unlike the French, they can speak with an English accent.
@matthewarkell3029Ай бұрын
They don't bounce down the barrel 🙄 also use paper cartridges you'll have a better time
@stevekay5486Ай бұрын
I would sooner you compare two original guns than copies.
@andyf4292Ай бұрын
french muskets and soldiers and Spanish powder- thats how the treasonous rebellion succeded!
@radoslavkosil7450Ай бұрын
Wdym? Muskets are firearms. Just antique/old.
@bryce43593 ай бұрын
American flintlock rifles are better because they are homemade and the person builds it for himself and knows how to make it so it works better for himself
@althesmith2 ай бұрын
In a military sense though they did not work well for large bodies of troops- they were far slower to load and fouled quickly.
@Sirjuiceski2 ай бұрын
im so pissed i dont know the name of that british anthem i think...
@davidbell16192 ай бұрын
March of British Grenaderes.
@leonardosantuario33463 ай бұрын
*What happened to the vietnam m16 video?*
@mishas_guns3 ай бұрын
We recently released it off our Patreon, enjoy! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gceilriKrrWyoGw.htmlsi=3V9XPYrEA3PAcLZW
@arronjameshook3 ай бұрын
How far away was the steel target? If it was under 200 yards, a musket can easily hit targets at that range.
@BrokenIET2 ай бұрын
Yeah, no. Muskets have a maximum effective range of no more than 100yds (in combat maybe 75). A rifle of the time such as the baker rifle had a maximum effective range of about 300yds (in combat maybe 200, could be stretched as far as 500 if clean, a good rifleman, properly loaded etc). Your estimates are very far off the mark, no idea where you‘ve pulled your figures from.
@arronjameshook2 ай бұрын
@@BrokenIET From Brett Gibbons of Paper Cartridges. People greatly underestimate the accuracy of muskets, because they weren’t as accurate as rifles.
@BrokenIET2 ай бұрын
@@arronjameshook It kinda depends on the musket realistically. But for the 7 years war to the end of the Napoleonic wars you really couldn’t coax much more than 100yds out of one. If people could fire from further away they would. But the fact is, they didn’t and there was a reason for it, namely that they just aren’t at all accurate. Countless studies, and sources from the time contradict what you say. Also, just a reminder that these muskets weren’t made for private hunters, but mass produced for the military. You almost certainly could get 150-200yds with a civilian one, but definitely with these.
@arronjameshook2 ай бұрын
@@BrokenIET That’s largely inaccurate conventional wisdom. If you search Paper Cartridges Musket 100 yards, you find a video where Brett Gibbons disproves the idea about muskets being highly inaccurate.