Which printer should you buy? The Canon Pro-300 or the Epson P700

Which printer should you buy? The Canon Pro-300 or the Epson P700 - Paper for Fine Art & Photography

Рет қаралды 3,532

Ай бұрын

In this weeks video Tim has tackled a subject that he has be meaning talk about for a while. Which printer should you buy, the Canon Pro-300 or the Epson P700?
This review of both printers will cover pros and cons for both printers mechanically as well as look at test prints.
It's a fairly long video and is a really world option and test, on measuring of colours and compare LAB numbers etc.
Both printers are avalible to buy from Fotospeed.com
Canon Pro-300: fotospeed.com/canon-pro-300.html
Epson SC-P700: fotospeed.com/epson-surecolou...
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fotospeed - Whatever your photographic requirements, let our passion for image-making provide the solution.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fotospeed, inspired by image makers around the world, Fotospeed began life manufacturing quality darkroom chemistry and specialist fine art printmaking processes.
With 35 years of the photo trade dealing with printing paper and chemicals. The wide selection of papers available range from the everyday photo glossy to the Fine Art textured paper that can turn a photo into a painting. Lots of research and development have helped Fotospeed to create the perfect paper no matter what final result is needed and the ability of the paper to receive the photo inks has been fine tuned to perfection, giving even coverage whatever the subject matter.
With a respected reputation for quality and service, Fotospeed is now an established distribution company for worldwide market leading brands such as Hahnemuhle Fine Art Papers, Kaiser Photographic equipment, Herma Adhesives and Canson Infinity Papers.
Whatever your photographic requirements, let our passion for image making provide the solution.
Meet the team. Everyone at Fotospeed is dedicated to ensuring that your requirements are met. From the moment your order is placed to the point it is dispatched. If you need technical support, advice or information we are available for help.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
► Whatever your photographic requirements check our website ➡️ fotospeed.com/
► Subscribe: / @fotospeeduk to see more videos.
► Find us on Twitter: / fotospeed
► Find us on Instagram: / fotospeed
► Find us on Facebook: / fotospeeduk
► Find us on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/fotospeed...

Пікірлер: 27

@tundrusphoto4312 Ай бұрын

A very interesting comparison. Thank you, Tim.

@leslielim890 12 күн бұрын

Thank you. Balanced and well presented comparison.

@JohnDoe1999-lg7mh 29 күн бұрын

I have owned the Epson 3880 and then then the 800.I did lots of research on both the Canon and Epson. There was one blaring thing that stood out that made me go with Epson. Never regretted going with the Epson. My only disappointment with the latest P900 was the size of the ink cartridges had become smaller. I could print so many images with a set. Of all the times that the print stopped because one of the inks ran out and had to replace it, never could spot the area where it happened. I got out of photography back in 2017 and sold off everything. Looking forward to get the P900 later this year. I really miss making prints. Was happy that Epson finally made the change so that you no longer needed to swap MK and PK inks when going from fine art papers to the other type of paper. I also use to have quite a variety of papers. This time will limit to two papers, Epson Hot Press Bright and Baryta II. I also had a target test print for each paper and adjusted black and white points of the image to match what the paper could do.

@mahdiali6732 Ай бұрын

I’d love to see a comparison video between the Epson P900 and the Canon Pro 1000

@womz8203 7 күн бұрын

Me too

@jaycee6996 Ай бұрын

My Canon Pro 300 eats ink every time you turn it on. This actually is significant and I believe the Epson does not have as bad a start up cost. I have started to batch up my printing to minimise the number of times I have to turn it on. This is a big pain. I would probably have chosen the Epson if I had known how much ink the Canon would consume just initialising after you turn it on.

@andyhoyle13 Ай бұрын

The recommendation is to leave the printer on at all times. The additional cost of electricity is very minimal in standby compared with ink used on startup or cleaning cycles.

@CarlosFaria-wy8rq Ай бұрын

Should be in standby all the time.

@leslielim890 12 күн бұрын

Even on full-time standby, if you don't print for 4 days, the Canon 300 will do an "ink agitation" before starting a print job. And that chews up a lot of ink! I have taken to printing a thumbnail pic every 2-3 days to avoid the ink agitation. Not a printer for a hobbyist who prints once a week. Must admit the prints are really good though. Wouldn't by the printer again.

@churchill378 Ай бұрын

I’ve owned the Epson P900 since start of this year and couldn’t be happier with my choice. Absolutely stunning prints and I’ve had zero issues with the printer. Plus the ink seems to last forever im on the original inks since February and I’ve done a lot of printing and test prints.

@anthonygardham4573 Ай бұрын

Tim I am devastated to learn that when the Canon Pro 300 ink waste pads fill up, it’s as cheap to buy a new printer, rather than being able to change the pads. It’s not lost on me that Canon make no mention of this fact in any of the promotional material.

@johnrambo4934 14 күн бұрын

Wow....

@photoventureselp Ай бұрын

Excellent review! Thank you for that! I wonder if there is a possibility that we have a comparison between Pro-200 and ET-8550. That would also be interesting.

@ramestica123 Ай бұрын

Many thanks for comparing and providing insights of the results. At 18m12s you mention that perhaps profiling would take care of the minor magenta cast of the canon prints. But at least for epson printing b&w with the printer's b&w mode works without a profile. Did I get wrongly?

@hansformat Ай бұрын

What about the gloss optimizer spray on the canon? Isn’t that a big advantage to eliminate gloss differential? Why didn’t you discuss this?

@dexon555 Ай бұрын

I can get a full suite of PRO300 inks for $124.00. Individual ink tanks are about $12.00 each. For my moderate use (1-3 prints a week), the lower replacement cost is easier to manage financially. I believe the Epson P700 ink carts are about $40.00 each (if memory serves me). An entire set is very costly for my budget. Just my $0.02.

@rpmorrisjr 28 күн бұрын

More video of the pictures and less video of you looking at them would be nice for future comparisons.

@johnvaleanbaily246 Ай бұрын

Interesting discussion - thank you. I own a 300 which has served me well for 2+ years now. My one complaint on the 300 is the small cartridge size, I would prefer larger, purely for the logistical purposes. Picking the type of black required on the Epsom seems from my perspective is a significant drawback. The major niggle for me on the Canon at setup time was the system automatically defaults to WiFi. I don't use WiFi for printing I prefer wired ethernet. Setting up for wired ethernet was an unnecessary and complex process. Black mark.

@andyhoyle13 Ай бұрын

On the Epson P700/900 the black switching is automatic and does not waste any ink. This was one of the major updates on the latest Epson printers.

@Totidev Ай бұрын

When I was researching these two printers, I came across an interesting detail - which may explain the sharpness issue. When you have a photo to print you should ensure it is set to 360 (or 720, 1440, 2880, 5760) DPI for Epson and 300 for Canon (or 600, 1200, 2400, 4800) - as these are the optimal sizes for the print head. If you don’t, the printer then tries it’s own calculation to compensate. For example, if your image DPI is 315 on the Epson it will try convert it to 360, which can result in loss of detail.

@chriscrowhurst Ай бұрын

it seems that the differentiation is in the detail. Everything else you describe seems to be fixable using a custom profile. Did you create profiles for both prior to your test? If so did you recheck to remove the magenta?

@kazdiller2114 Ай бұрын

I seem to get better results with the Canon printer using the Canon print software rather than printing directly from Lightroom. Have you noticed any difference between the two printing methods? If so, could this explain the marginal difference in sharpness?

@kaneclements7761 Ай бұрын

I've got the older Canon Pro 10S and I struggled using the Canon software. After watching Tim demonstrate printing from Lightroom my hit rate improved enormously. I do regularly calibrate my Apple monitor using a Spyder thingy which helps a lot.

@demiguel Ай бұрын

I have the 300 and the P900. Canon has VERY visible ink drop pattern... :(

@andyhoyle13 Ай бұрын

Tim, your comment about black switching on the latest P700/P900 is misleading. They have ten channels so there is no black switching as there used to be on the P600/P800 and earlier Epson printers.

@FotospeedUK Ай бұрын

Thought that is what I said?