haha thanks man

I'm excited to see you get back on your content creation horse too

haha very much so, it's why I love it so much

In his creation, with a bit of blender!

yeah, he's still trying to make content though, I can't wait for him to get better

Dude this sucks. I cant eat real food for a few months :(

@@UncleVenz burger smoothies bro! haha

@@fillman86 its funny because i actually tried. never again.

@@UncleVenz XD HAHAHAHA

haha well he is american :P I'm surprised it didn't come with a v8 and a bench seat ;)

awesome! It'd be great if you could join us in the next one :)

@@fillman86 Will do!

we can hope :)

@@fillman86 Preach it my dude! Goddamn do I love your content as well as the content of other creators in the community. Seeing you all come together is like watching "The Expendables" where all those iconic action movie Actors were cast in the same movie. It's good stuff :) ALSO: I love the look of your car! It looks a lot like a Spyker C8 GT2-R with a Group C front end slapped on

Also I really hope things start getting better for Venz. His content is really great and from what little I've chatted with him in the comments on your videos he's genuinely a nice guy.

@@omar.alsharif lol I like the expendables likening XD I'm still trying to bring more together. wow I always thought the spiker was ugly with its bad proportions, but in this race trim (that I didn't know existed), I love it!

he's a good guy, and doesn't deserve what happened to him

Thank you

and it changed nothing :P

unfortunately beamng isn't really accurate to real life yet. I had loads more downforce, but found it still usable with less. It's also nearly impossible to stop a car from bottoming out if it wants to, without ruining handling. I did try a few times to find out how much downforce they created, but the information was sparse, because it changed often with new tech, and rules. We also can't get the same sort of rotation to reduce aero at top speeds like they did, because of the bottoming out issue haha So running less is kinda required

haha I like f1..... but I'm not going to lie, I only ever watch the highlights :P It's just so boring haha

@@fillman86 to be fair I haven't watched a full, live F1 face in almost 10 years. First corner was the highlight of the race! I'm guessing it's largely the same these days even though I don't watch, I sometimes hear the results on the sports news.

XD I need those clicks haha otherwise my growth will stay small

@@fillman86 same hehehehehehhehehe.... ;)

6 subs is enough right?

@@EkaiMin for me it is ;D jkjk

@@EkaiMin 8 so far, but I'm my growth is going at a snail's pace recently

yeah, I kept it a total secret :P I bet you could tell me your bank details, and I wouldn't tell anyone else HAHA

@@fillman86 alright bet 🤪 still ready waiting with my wallet at the ready for the channel memberships 😂

oh baby, there will be more

I'm glad you liked it, and yes! There will be more in the future :)

awwwwww shucks :P I'm glad you're as excited as I am

oh man this was my first big race event, and it was so much fun!!

lol race cars aren't his strong suit, but we're doing different things :)

lol what's lucky is that I didn't end up getting blown off as spam haha

@@fillman86 😂

of course you're going to hell, who violently abuses a dakimakura waifu?!?!?!!!!!!!

@@fillman86 XD

lol he's brutal :P

thanks man, though this is an old one :P

lol not a stream, a collab, but I'm thinking I'll put up an extended, less edited version

oh my god, this is one of the strangest cars I've ever seen.... and I don't think it's possible in automation

@@fillman86 Do you think it's possible to make the body in Blender? At the very least it shouldn't be too hard to make a replica of the engine.

@@EpicB my blender skills are very limited haha

@@fillman86 That's fine. At the minimum the car's engine should be easy to make.

We're not locking into anything just yet. Getting people to agree on this one day was tricky, and we had 2 drop outs already

Fair enough but I did comment on a couple of Jimmy's videos for you

@@kylestacks7197 hahaha awesome!

that is coming too :)

That was made by Tievskiy, and it was based on a ford I believe, but I believe you'd have to go ask him

@@fillman86 alright, i'd love to be able to drive it, looks incredible, massive step up from what you'd find on the in-game repository.

don't really know what that is. Isn't that just a car?

Sorry let me elaborate from my understanding the trans am racing series was an American Motorsport during the 60s and 70s mainly where muscle cars went racing on road courses the exact rules and specs of it I'm unsure of but if I'm correct no vehicles allowed in engine larger than 5L

Mustang, Camaro, Firebirds, and the AMC Javelin just to name a few. Also I believe that's where the Pontiac Firebird Trans-am got it's name from

@@kylestacks7197 oh okay, so just 5L muscle cars? I'll add it to the list

I'll do a bit of research right quick but I know that's the big thing

Haha he wasn’t even around then

@fillman86 I know but he would have brought an absolutely ridiculous car into the mix 😂

@@theminimancjb36 oh we do videos like that, but for these races I limit people to taking it seriously

@fillman86 fair enough I only found grogtv recently and as a fellow brit I can confirm we are that weird 😅

you can pop over to his channel if you want, he's just had his jaw unwired recently, so that's a plus

I will be holding viewer events, but this one was just a collab with other creators :)

Thank mate

My Group C Racecar would be APP (stand for Asura Performance Power) 670WER12 SPECS: 4.2 LT APP V12 : Turbo Charged : 670+HP : 0-60 in 3.2 seconds : Top Speed 360 KMH

haha this is a collab video

I'm so confused.....

@@fillman86 your Chanel creations are historical legends for automation

@@fuscaazul4283 haha it was only a little faster, and the other 2 cars were finomially designed! but thanks, I was quite happy with how it turned out :)

@@fillman86 if i were in the competition you would have to run against my 1000hp group c Porsche knock off

@@fuscaazul4283 but not for long, as you'd be out of fuel

I've driven both, and neither are sims :P I will admit that motorsport is less arcade like, but I'd only be willing to go as far as a sim-cade like people call gran turismo sport, and project cars 3

@@fillman86 No...I have to take a stand on this. Motorsport has over 800 physics calculations for all aspects of the car refreshed at 360 times a second...it is the most accurate simulation out there and those are facts you can look up! The fact that they made it more entertaining than BeamNG in it's implementation is the real engineering miracle...but someone calling it "Arcade" is just pure ignorance.The heavy disinformation campaign by PlayStation types didn't help matters, yelling lies about the brand because it threatened GT, imagine of some dickhead with a Gran Turismo avatar pic started saying "BeamNG is crap because it has no physics & damage modelling".

@@alexandriabrangwin you know, I've never looked much into fm7, just occasional game play, and by the way the cars semi slide at high speed, the off feel of speed, and breaking ... it's a sim-cade... Don't get me wrong, lots of people like sim cade. GT sport is a sim-cade... which is why I didn't like it when I played it (and may never play it again) I'm comparing it to true-er sims like assetto corsa competizione, which I play in my spare time. Also R-Factor 2 (which I'm going to be getting into soon too) is what I'd consider a realistic sim. How many calculations it does is not the point :P I'm not telling you to not like it, but to realise there's different types of games

@@fillman86 I think I see the core of the discussion...the "feel". FM7 is accurate, but tied to a more accessible handling model....Assetto (got it too) is beyond sloppy on the math but tied to a less forgiving & weighty control.....Horizon is drunk fireworks sex in a bonfire!

@@alexandriabrangwin a "more accessible handling model" is what we call arcade like :P Comparing assetto coras, to assetto corsa competizione is like comparing fh4 to fm7 :P

why hello there ;)

general kenobi

YOU ARE A BOLD ONE

they didn't break any rules, they.... found a way around, and the governing body banned it because it was against the spirit of the rules :P what they could have done is.... any kind of research, and made a capacity limitation specifically for rotaries instead. But I suppose banning was just easier haha

@@fillman86 They never really banned rotaries from C2 category I belive. They just banned all engines from C1 and made everyone use 3.5 NA engines of any cylinder number and arrangement type (like F1 in those years). Problems was - it became too expensive (I mean F1 engines duh), so no manufacturer really wanted to invest (only Jaguar, Toyota and Peugeot took it seriously with Mercedes doing some tests, but never racing and Mazda took a Judd engine for their Jaguar-XJR-14-based effort). Of course there was no way for privateers to even compete in C1 at that time. Cars like Porsche 962 (2.8-3.2 flat 6 TT) which, prior to 1991, used to be C1 were put in C2 from 1991 to 1993 and heavily nerfed (more weight for example).

@@DonatProdanSimRacing yeah, motorsport bodies make some odd decisions... I feel it's an ego thing :P

@@fillman86 Can't comment on that, but it was some fishy stuff definitely. There are theories saying they purposely killed Group C so that it wouldn't steal F1's glory or something. I'm mean, it's maFIA afterall.

there was many work arounds to get the rules to line up with the map that we'd planned to use (but had to switch to spa), so that's why the year was off. As for mazda, they were sooooo cheating, but not breaking the rules :P It's like the people with the first flexible f1 wings.... the rules were there, but were ill defined haha much like the lack of regulation on rotaries (though I don't think banning them was the right idea) as for specifics, I couldn't read every single article in the whole entire world. Whilst skimming, it seemed that the FIA, with a few manufacturers wanted to make racing more affordable/safe, and going with 3.5L engines was their solution. (it may or may not have been the best choice, but they felt something needed to be done) :) I wish I knew everything, but I have limitations on time, I'm dyslexic, and I'm always freaking editing a video, so I'm usually tired XD

@@fillman86 Once again, Mazda wasn't cheating. Their engine was perfectly legal for pre-1991 C1 and in 1991 it got put in C2 category due to rule changes. Yes it was heavily illegal for C1 in 1991, but it never raced in C1 anyway.

​@@DonatProdanSimRacing they didn't break the rules no.... they broke the spirit of the rules. And that's just as good as the real thing. people like to argue that they didn't, but I'm forever going to be un-budging on this haha. If they had have seen the rotary's potential incoming long enough away, they would have banned it before

@@fillman86 Common misconception. Mazda 787B was actually dogshit. It was super slow and rotary engine was only reliable compared to F1 engines (which obviously weren't designed to lap at Le Mans for 24h). So new rules didn't ban rotary because it was good. It just banned all engines that weren't 3.5 NA, that meant godly Porsche 3.0 flat 6, Jaguar 7.0 V12 and Mercedes-Sauber, all of which, of course, won at Le Mans before 1991.