Hatur nuhun kang

Allah said in a Qudsi hadeeth : “All deeds are for the sons of Adam, except fasting it’s for me and i reward it” Narrator: abo huraira, (Bukhari and muslim)

❤️

Thank you. Happy fasting guys

How true and to the point, as reading the Qur'an in numerous places states clearly that it is only the Qur'an, the Revelation of Allah that the Messenger was to convey and that is why he left no Bukharian hadith. It is an act of shirk to associate the Bukharian writings with Allah in any shape or form as a part of our Deen, way of life and anyone doing so belongs to an ajami [Allama Iqbal] religion, not a submitting to Allah one, Islam. Some more verses to ponder over 7:28 (As an example,) when people commit an indecency they say, "We found our forefathers doing it and God has enjoined it upon us" (made it natural for us). Say (O Prophet), "God never enjoins indecency. Do you attribute to God that of which you have no knowledge?" 7:29 Say (O Messenger), "My Lord enjoins justice and to stand devoted to Him alone in complete submission at all time and place. Call unto Him, sincere in your faith in Him alone. As He brought you into being in the first place, so shall you return to Him.” 7:30 Some He has guided, others have deserved straying. They take satanic people as allies instead of God, and think that they are rightly guided. [7:3, 22:13. The straying ones take their religious leadership as their masters instead of God] 7:173 Nor will any excuse avail them such as, “It was our forefathers who took false gods and we inherited their belief system. Will you punish us for what falsehood others practiced?” [You will not be questioned what others used to do. No one will bear the load of another. 2:134, 39:7] 7:174 Thus We explain Our verses in all clarity so that people return (to the Book). 7:175 And tell them what happened to him whom Our messages were conveyed but he cast them off. Thus Satan (his selfish desires) overpowered him until he became of those who lost their way. 7:176 He could have raised himself in honor according to Our laws, but he clung to the earth and followed his own desires. Therefore his likeness is as the likeness of a dog. If you scold him, he pants, or if you leave him alone, he still pants. Such is the example of the nation that belies Our revelations. So, relate this narration that they may reflect. [If it had been Our will = If he chose Our laws of humiliation. God’s revelation lightens your burdens while manmade dogmas place burdens on you. 7:157] 7:177 Evil as an example are the people who reject Our verses, since they hurt their own ‘self’.

@@truehikma What's funny is that most sectarians call Qur'an-only followers as "Quranist" even though it's already mentioned in The Qur'an that: Say, "I am not something original among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner." (46:9) And when Our verses are recited to them as clear evidences, those who do not expect the meeting with Us say, "Bring us a Qur'an other than this or change it." Say, [O Muhammad], "It is not for me to change it on my own accord. I only follow what is revealed to me. Indeed I fear, if I should disobey my Lord, the punishment of a tremendous Day." (10:15)

@@michaelleroi8615 What I find funny and sad is that people like Paul and his Bukharian friends at speakers corner in Hyde park and elsewhere, can give a very credible answer against the atheists and Christians, no God, Trinity etc, quoting the Bible or showing no scriptural authority from it, yet they go blank where the Qur'an is concerned. The Qur'an has a trinity of verses saying that those who fail to judge everything they do by its Guidance are: 5:44 ..... And whoever fails to judge or rule by what God has revealed, such are the disbelievers (‘Kafiroon’). 5:47 Let the People of the Gospel judge by what God has revealed therein. And whoever fails to judge or rule by what God has revealed, are drifters from the right path (‘Faasiqoon’). 5:49 So judge between them by what God has revealed. And do not follow their vain desires. Beware of them, lest they divert you from some of what God has revealed to you. If they turn away from the truth, be assured that God has decided to chastise them for some of their crimes. A great many people drift away from the right path. As for going blank, the Qur'an also describes why this happens: 2:18 Deaf, dumb and blind of reason! They will not return to journey in the right direction (unless they use reason. 8:22, 16:76, 17:36). Paul comes across as a very logical and well read man, but when he cannot do basic cross-referencing of the Qur'an to remove the contradictions in Bukharianism beliefs, then having all those books is like: 62:5 (The Book of God is to be read and understood, and not placed in high niches.) The example of those who were entrusted with Torah and did not apply it in their daily lives, is that of the donkey that carries a load of books. Evil is the example of people who belie God’s revelations. God does not guide people who choose to do wrong (and displace the revelation from its rightful status). [Kizb = Belie = Give lie = Deny in practice. Kufr = Reject openly = Darkness = Denial = Ingratitude = Concealing. Zulm = Dislodge from the rightful place = Relegate the truth = Give preference to conjecture = Oppression = Wrongdoing = Violation of human rights]

Hey hadithers Does Buhkari Explain the Quran? The advocates of hadith are fond of saying that the hadith explains the Quran without which, they say the Quran cannot be understood. In other words without hadith they will have to reject the Quran or at least ignore it. The scholars also say that the hadith they call "Sahih Bukhary" is the best hadith. It can be easily proved that the hadith does not in any way explain the Quran and that the "Sahih Bukhari" is not worth the papers it is printed on. For evidence please refer to, and check all references of "Sahih Al-Bukhary" by Dr. Muhammed Muhsin Khan, Islamic University, Medina Al-Munawwara. Publisher "Kitab Bhavan, New Delhi, which is the Nine volume encyclopedia. Vol. 6 of "Sahih Al-Bukhary" is devoted to the explanation of the Quran (Tafsir). The other eight volumes prescribe things like drinking camels urine to cure fevers (vol 7, hadith no 590), burning people first and then their houses if they do not go the mosque on time, (vol.1, hadith no.626), dreaming of undressing women (vol 9, hadith no.139 and 140), using shoes to garland camels (Vol 2, hadith no 763), and other such non-sense. But let us focus on vol. 6: the explanation of the Quran by Imam Bukhary. Although the Quran has 114 suras or chapters, Bukhari does not explain all the verses in all the suras. Sura 2, Al Baqarah has 286 verses, but Bukhari only provides hadith for about 50 verses. This is slightly over 20% of Al Baqarah. Bukhari has left the Ulamma groping the dark over the remaining 80%. Sura AL Kauther (Sura 108) is the shortest sura in the Quran, only 3 verses. However Bukhari "attempts" to explain the meaning of just one word "Kauther" as sufficient to explain this whole Sura. Bukhari says; "Kauther" is a river in heaven. But simply, "Kauther" means "good in abundance". (Translation by President of Islamic research, IFAT, Saudi Arabia). This also suggests that Imam Bukhari did not know Arabic. It is a fact that Bukhari was a Persian from Bukhara and his mother tongue was Farsi. The scholars have no records to show when Bukhari learned Arabic. More about this later. The greatest surprise of all is that 28 suras of the Quran are NOT "explained" at all. The sura numbers are as follows; 23, 27, 29, 35, 51, 57, 58, 64, 67, 69, 70, 73, 76, 81, 82, 86, 88, 89, 90, 94, 100, 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, and 109. Bukhari explains this away as follows "no hadith were mentioned here." According to the scholars only the Prophet is supposed to be the source of the hadith. The hadith is supposed to explain the Quran. The BIG question is, "Who went on un authorized holiday for 28 WHOLE SURAS of the Quran ?!!! The scholars insist that the hadith explains the Quran. Hence the scholars have to do away with 28 SURAS of the Quran because Bukhari did not explain these 28 SURAS.. Therefore the boast by the scholars that those who uphold the QURAN ALONE and do NOT depend on the hadith at all, cannot understand the Quran, falls FLAT on its face. The scholars are in a far worse situation. 28 Suras are missing and none of the other suras are explained in full by Bukhari. To revert to the earlier point that the Persian Bukhari may not have known Arabic, this is suggested by the way Bukhari has changed the names of certain SURAS. By itself this is a strange phenomenon. The scholars themselves do NOT know why Bukhary did this. Non-Arabs sometimes refer to a Sura by its first verse. This is because they may not have known the Arabic name for the SURA because they are not scholars of the Quran or simply because they are not Arabs. Bukhari displays the same characteristics. Sura Al Naba (Sura 68) is labelled as Sura "Amma yatasa'alun", this is actually part of the first verse of the sura.. Sura Al Baiyina (Sura 98) is labelled as Sura "Lam Yakun". Again the beginning verses. Sura Al Takwir (Sura 81) is labelled Sura "Idhash Shamsu Kuwirat". This is the start of the first verse again. Sura Al Maarij (sura 70) is labelled Sura "Sa'ala Sa'ilun". Some SURAS have been given two names. Sura Al Insan (Sura 76) is labelled Sura "Hal-Ata-insani" or Sura "Dahr". But this is a revealing point because such labeling is more akin to reciters who are not Arabs, who do not know the Arabic language. Apart from the fact that Bukhari was Persian from Bukhara many scholars believe that he was also blind. The next question is "WHO WROTE the Sahih Bukhari?!" It will also be pertinent to see how Bukhari handles some of the explanations of the verses-if and when he cares to explain them. For example some explanations end with a blank space.: Vol 6, Hadith number 50 seeks to explain Sura 2:223. After some narration it continues like this; Nafi' added regarding the verse: "So go to your tilth when or how you will. Ibn Umar said; " It means one should approach his wife in........" The explanation ends with a blank space. But not to worry. A footnote completes the picture. The footnote says "Al Bukhary left a blank space here because he was not sure of what Ibn Umar had said !." And yet this called "Sahih Al Bukhary" Perhaps this is why some scholars have much problems in this department. There is also one of the most foolish and incredible explanation by Bukhari for Sura 11:5. The beautiful meaning of the verse is actually :11:4 "To God is your return and He has power over all things." 11:5 "Behold ! They fold up their hearts, that they may be hid from him. Ah! Even when they cover themselves with their garments. He knows what they conceal, and what they reveal. For He knows well the (innermost secrets) of the hearts." 11:6 There is no moving creature on earth but its substance depends on God; He knows its resting place and its temporary deposit. All is in a clear Record." Translation by Presidency of Islamic Research, IFTA, Saudi Arabia.. This meaning is crystal clear. We all answer to God. There is nothing we can conceal from God. Every single thing that we do is in a clear Record. "Kitaab-un Maubeen". So do not think you can hide anything from God. NOW, Here is Bukhari's ridiculous explanation of the same verse in 11:5. Vol. 6 Hadith no. 203: Narrated Muhammed bin Abbad bin Jaafar that he heard Ibn Abbas reciting: " No doubt! they fold up their breasts." 11:5 and asked him about the explanation. He said, "Some people used to hide themselves while answering the call of nature in an open space lest they be exposed to the sky, so the above revelation was sent down regarding them. According to Bukhari, the whole purpose of this narration was to tell the Sahaba that God could see them defecating and sleeping in the desert!. According to Bukhari's logic then, after this verse was revealed, the Sahaba who travelled with their wives in the desert lost all their inhibitions, since God could see them anyway. No need to hide anything. Similarly Bukhari twists sura 5:87. To explain "5:87" Bukhari first quotes it partially only, not in full, as follows : "O you who believe DO NOT make unlawful the good things which God has made for you" 5:87 The explanation by Bukhari (Vol.6 Hadith no. 139) is as follows : Narrated Abdullah "We used to participate in holy wars conducted by the prophet and we had no women with us. So, we said (to the prophet) "Shall we castrate ourselves "? But the prophet forbade us to do that and therefore he allowed us to marry a woman temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then the prophet recited. "O you who believe ! Do not make unlawful for you...."There is a footnote "Temporary marriage (Mut'a) was allowed in the early days of Islam., but later, at the time of the Khaibar Battle, it was prohibited (God knows it better)." The uncertainty in the footnote lends support to the fact that this is an evil lie against God and the prophet by Bukhari. Sura 5:87 is actually as follows : O you who believe, do not prohibit good things that are made lawful by God, and do not aggress; God dislikes the aggressors. Is prostitution an excess ? Worse than that it is an evil. Which Muslim scholar will allow his daughter to receive "even a garment" as a payment for temporarily servicing the lusts of some Sahaba ? Note how the Bukhari has the sahaba coolly suggesting "Shall we castrate ourselves ?" as though it is done every morning after breakfast. In Sura 24:33 God and the messenger told us: Those who cannot afford to get married shall maintain morality until God provides for them from His grace. Those among your servants who wish to be freed in order to marry, you shall grant them their wish, once you realize that they are honest. And give them from God's money that He has bestowed upon you. You shall not force your girls to commit prostitution, seeking the materials of this world, if they wish to be chaste. If anyone forces them, then God, seeing that they are forced, is Forgiver, Merciful.

@@centi50s Salaam brother, May Allah bless you and your family. I can completely relate to everything you just said in your comments. I to was indoctrinated to believe in these ridiculous hadeeth collections. Then it wasn't long until I noticed the absurdities and nonsensical rubbish in these hadeeths. Like Moses (as) chasing a stone that apparently ran away with his clothes! The reason for this was so that Allah can prove to the Children of Israel that Moses (as) had perfect looking testicles. Yes, this is Sahih hadeeth found in Bukhari!!! Another hadeeth tells us that Moses (as) slapped the angel of death while trying to collect his soul. We are then told that the angel of death informs Allah of this and then Allah tells the angel to go back and tell Moses to place his hand on the back of an Ox. And how ever many hairs he sees on his hand, he can live for that many more years. According to this hadeeth, not only does the angel fail to collect the soul of Moses, but apparently Allah leaves it to chance!! Yes, this is another Sahih hadeeth!!! Are we to believe this ridiculous nonsense??? I thought I was losing my mind because everyone is upholding these Sahih hadeeths. I then tossed all this rubbish aside and started focuses on the Qur'an. That's when the Verses made sense and became crystal clear! I thank our Lord for guiding me and it's a delight to see like minded individuals also waking up to the truth! Take care my brother! Peace

The Prophet liked Qamis. Its that long white robe. There is a Hadith for this

while you're at it wear it a khimar and jillaba and surma so you look most Arab like

louder plz they think if they ate like the prophet sleep like the prophet and be like the prophet in appearence that means they are following his sunnah !!! and when you tell him why you use cars to travel or planes that's not sunnah they will say you need to adapt to your own time !! they don't know what to say they are extremist i see the ones who associate growing a beard with the sunnah of the prophet ARE extremist

When you love someone, you want to emulate them and walk where they walked, do what they did. It's not compulsory but it's a passion and sunnah.

@@jimmy_x557 disagree

no stoning in quran. stoning only found in bible for adultery apostasy and gays. moe used this punishment from bible before related verses came down from the quran

Exactly thank you 👍

you are a disbeliever, you immediately reject the verse, deny the explanation from the Qur'an itself, disregard the verse. Reserve your place in the fire. I will trust Imam Bukhari who came 200 years after the Prophet and the Qur'an more than you who came after 1400 years after the Prophet Muhammad.

The li- in litubayyina here is referring to what? Where else does this word appear in surah 16? In reference to what?

@@zayn3134 from 570 to 810 is 240 years.

What is missing in this verse is that know about the prophet through books written some 200-250 years after the prophet? Why this selective reading of hadith then? For example, why shouldnt we accept shia collections of hadith?

Quran is not holy😂

No it doesn't. 😃😃.Even by a long shot

@@randomtravelsrandomthought8613 stay wandering, that's your limits. Have a great day 😊

🥰

⁠​⁠@@BloggingTheology​​⁠​⁠​⁠ Hi, you’ve explained the Sunni argument very well, almost as well as they have been doing for hundreds of years. In future before quoting a verse or sentence from a book make sure you do it in context. For example the Quran 4:59 is following 4:58 where Allah makes commandments. From my understanding the entire Surah Al-Nisa is dedicated to commandments and laws which was foreign to the Arab world. Allah wants these commandments obeyed. When we are asked to obey Allah and His Messenger (PBUH) we are asked to follow the Quran. If Allah had said obey Me that’s confusing as Allah has revealed other books with its own laws, so Allah refers to Mohamed (PBUH) too. As God says in Quran 4:58 He is All Hearing All Seeing and in 4:59 He refers to those that seek judgment from false judges. When one accepts Islam it’s best to follow the Quran with reasoning. It is Justice, Mercy and a reminder for mankind and Jinn.

​@Shkra The key word in your speech is "I think..." That explains everything!

Did prophet Muhammad (pbuh) taught something that Allah didn't teach Him? Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was called the walking Quran and He didn't teach anything other than what Allah revealed. In bukhari, muslim u will find some hadiths that directly contradicts Quranic basis of teachings. I am not saying u should reject all hadiths but u have to check hadiths with quranic basis and teachings. Its high time to recheck the word 'sahih'. Afterall it is men works and no man is above mistakes. On the otherhand Quran is divine. Btw i m not quranist.

@@user-si5eq1je3r i didn't say all hadiths are wrongs infact without hadiths we wouldn't have rules about how to pray, pilgrimage etc in details. At the same time people pray differently according to different madhabs!! Why is that??...prophet Muhammad sw definitely didn't pray differently at different times. Tell me how could all be sahih at the same time?? I just wanna say man are not above mistakes. Hadiths are not divine whether bukhari or muslims. Prophet Muhammad didn't order to compile his works at his lifetime. Similarly the 4 caliph's didn't compile hadiths. Imam Malik(ra)rejected thousands of hadiths while compiling hadiths for the first time almost 93 yrs after prophet Muhammad(pbuh).He was resident of madina!! Imagine thousands hadiths were rejected at that time in Medina as false in the name of prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Imam bukhari(may Allah be pleased with him)compiled hadiths centuries after prophet Muhammad(pbuh). He did an extraordinary job . There are thousands of hadiths in bukhari and Muslims but U will find some serious defects in some hadiths, even those directly contradicts Quranic teachings and even make our prophet laughable. Not all hadiths i repeat. I just wanna say calling all hadiths sahih is wrong. U have to cross check them with quranic principles. Remember men are not above mistakes.

@@user-si5eq1je3r it seems like u didn't properly read my comments or failed to understand what i tried to say. I never ever said hadits compiled by imam malik true or controversial. I just wanted to say he was the first compiler of hadiths and he rejected thousands of hadiths during his work. In just a century of prophet muhammad sw. died how could there be so many false hadiths in the name of prophet even in medina??? Imam malik didn't choose someone's narrated hadiths but it could be possible the same man's narrated hadiths have put in other hadiths books too. We can't even answer why praying rules differs from madhabs to madhabs. These praying rituals came from hadiths, right? Why Hanafi, shafi, maliki, hanbali,(left alone shia schools) differs about the singlemost important praying practice?? They were all right at the same time?? How come??

@@ghg12374 No. The Prophet did pray at different times. If a Hadith is mass-transmitted with an authentic chain, then we accept the Hadith. Hadith usually provide extra info on Quranic law.

@@ghg12374 Abu Bakr compiled Ahadith. Imam Malik may have rejected some Hadith but did not reject all. We believe that Hadith aren't all Sahih. That's why we believe that Hadith fall into the categories of Sahih, Hasan, Daif and Mawdu'. To see whether a Hadith is true, we have to check the chain. Hadith are reported through chains of transmission e.g. X heard from Y who heard from Z that the Prophet said this. If there are defects in the chain, then they are rejected if there is no Sahih Hadith/corroborating evidence to back what the Hadith said.

Was not the Quran narrated to us by the same people , where is your logic ?

@@shahkhan4347 - urang is saying both are pertinent, but the Qur'an takes precedence where appropriate.

How did you come to this outstanding discovery?

@@sajO5754 who ?

@@stephenconnolly1830 no I'm not supposing he is !

❤️

His* servants

Sorry for the wake up call he's got it all wrong

@wim develder We have Kitab as well as Hikam taught by Muhammad (saw).. It's absurd to skip the wisdom of the sayings of Prophet Muhammad (saw), You can reject those hadiths which go against Quran. The Sunnah and Hadith are also protected by the Islamic community, Quran is pure, we do not claim all hadiths are sahih. If you leave sunnah, hadith - you are missing the wisdom and only will have Kitab, my dear Quranist.

@wim develder of course my friend, the qur'an is and always be an authority above the hadiths

@@HaidirGhani meanwhile hadith is explanation of quran, how did you do your prayer without hadith? ... i mean people confuse between hadith sahih and fabricated , hence they generalize that all hadith cannot be trusted Quranist is new sect of islam , you never see them in early era of islam.

@wim develder No Muslim will say worship Bukhari, that you added right? We never claimed anyone apart from Prophets are infallible. Hadith isn't a second revelation, but are the wisdom, the sayings of Muhammad (pbuh) if you miss it, you miss a great knowledge and without Hikam what will you achieve? No Muslim will ask you to follow the hadith over Quran, the Quran is our first preference. Please stop lying like that we worship Bukhari, Bukhari (r) himself taught us to reject hadith which comes against Quran. He did the work of collecting the sayings of Muhammad (saw), now what's the point in accusing his works?

@wim develder "obey Allah and obey the messenger". I know how to obey Allah, but how do we obey "The Messenger"?

Many thanks!

❤️

أذكرني و إخوتك في اللّه في الجامعة الٱسلامية في سجودكم أن يُيسّر اللّه لي و لأسرتي العودة من بلاد الغرب إلى وطننا ... يا ربّ...آمين

@@ikmal8416 thanks for the advice. Though of doin the same but after reading ur comment, i think it suffice. Salam fr Gombak.

@@StProto Who is the old man suffering and being tortured and cruxified in ur profile photo? Did the old man died? Pity him.

@@norama3998 اسأل الله عزوجل ان يردكم الى بلدكم سالمين غانمين

thank you

Please pray with him to keep his western critical way of thinking and not sink in the medieval none sense that Britain got a rid of years ago.

Many many thanks

Like he brought something new. I wish he was more fair in his research. Instead of just relying on the most comment sect. He didn’t mention the reasoning behind why we claim we should only follow Quran. It’s like he used a book of a sunni. Of course he is ganna say what pleases his sunnies

@@adelseddouki3375 I can discuss with you this topic on messenger or some other platform. Leave the way to contact you, and discuss it in a respectful and friendly manner. Salam

@Anam Alia How would you know. At least I put my trust in Allah’ s words. Who do you put your trust on ? He said someone said that someone said that he said someone said. Good luck 👍🍀

@Anam Alia learn Arabic first then discuss Islam fundamentals 👍

Glad you like them!

It’s not fair that Paul can’t understand Arabic so he relies solely on the dominant sect books. Sunna. That’s not Islam it’s a sect of Islam.

@@adelseddouki3375 bruhhhhhh Quran and sunnah is islam

❤️

@Eremias Ranwolf There is obligatory sunnah and optional sunnah. Eg. Walking into bathroom with left foot is optional. Beard for men is obligatory. With optional sunnah if you do it, you are rewarded if you don't do it, you are not punished for it.

We were entrusted with the Qur'an but follow 'scholars', Bukhari, Hamafi madhab etc which is what the Jews did, they neglected the true Taurat of Allah for their rabbinical teachings, and this is how the Qur'an addresses those who do this and follow numerous scholars and their numerous interpretations, rulings etc> 62:5 (The Book of God is to be read and understood, and not placed in high niches.) The example of those who were entrusted with Torah and did not apply it in their daily lives, is that of the donkey that carries a load of books. Evil is the example of people who belie God’s revelations. God does not guide people who choose to do wrong (and displace the revelation from its rightful status). [Kizb = Belie = Give lie = Deny in practice. Kufr = Reject openly = Darkness = Denial = Ingratitude = Concealing. Zulm = Dislodge from the rightful place = Relegate the truth = Give preference to conjecture = Oppression = Wrongdoing = Violation of human rights] Qur'an alone or shirk idolatry!

@@livinia296 beard for men is obligatory? maybe you should use a blunt blade or.knofe for shaving instead of razor.

​@truehikma Brother such a strong word you used here and I quote 'Quran alone or face shirk' can you explain a little detail

Thanks a lot 😊

Glad it was helpful!

Wow

وَفَوْقَ كُلِّ ذِى عِلْمٍ عَلِيم and above every one possessed of knowledge is the All-knowing one.

@@BloggingTheology This hit me hard...

@@StProto I mean if he is, he’s clearly still against homosexuality and the LGBT community, he’s made videos about it and community posts too.

@@StProto I know people have different choices about many things... Some people feel attracted to what their God forbade them... Some people get attracted to neighbour's wife or daughter I got attracted today towards eating a dish that my mom prepared which was forbade by my God during Ramadan Some people want to burn every thing Some want to kill everyone We will not be held accountable for the crimes we didn't act on... A person who has such attractions and yet prevents himself from crime will get the greatest reward... If he is acting on what he is attracted to then I will try to be away from his channel...

To make matters easier in case you can’t read the Arabic text: These are God's signs that We recite to you with truth. So, in which hadith, after God and His signs, do they acknowledge

Hope this is helpful

Welcome aboard!

What is an ex Quranist?

لا يوجد هذا اللّفظ في ديننا الإسلامي أبدا... نحن مسلمون ..

Nope, I’ve refuted many if not most of his claims, especially around Qur’an 2:143. The truth is-Jake used to be part of a Quranist 19-obsessed cult, and was then bamboozled by some sunnis who used these loose isolated verses to support brand Islam’s second scripture (i.e the Hadith).

@@StProto Having homosexual urges is not sinful-it is ACTING upon those sexual urges that is sinful. But do you know what IS “haram”? To serve & worship anything other than God, including Jesus Christ the son of Mary, who was no more than a messenger who commanded you to serve God alone-his Lord and your Lord. So will you not take heed?

@@StProto You’re spreading the same message everywhere and I’m not sure what your agenda is. What a sad act this is you’re doing. Btw being gay isn’t haram in and of itself by the consensus of the scholars, it’s the act that is a sin. God doesn’t punish you for your thoughts and feelings according to our Islamic teachings and Paul acknowledges this teaching, in one video I saw he mentions that struggles and doesn’t indulge in the sin. Just like people who love to drink but actively fight the urge. There is an immense reward in that as that is Jihad Ul Nafs (the struggle against one’s desires) which is a great deed in the eyes of God Almighty. Therefore, he has my utmost respect and adoration for that alone. What do you aim to achieve here? Clearly the people who are subscribed to Paul’s channel respect him and he has one of the most interactive audiences I’ve seen on KZfaq so whatever it is you’re trying to achieve, just move on, it’s not going to work.

they won't listen brother, they're top invested in their imams and shaikhs

Thank you brother this is significant

@wim develder Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Ibn majah, ahmed, Nis'ai, Abi dawood, etc all these are people who *collected* the sayings of the prophet(saws) in one place by proving the chains of narrations, hadiths which was already written & memorized by 1000s of other major scholars of that time.. they did by as much as they can travel, argue, cross-verified by others' testimonies, and gain knowledge from the most reliable scholars who saved authentic knowledge with them, they were whole schools.. starting from Prophet(saws) to sahaba, then taba'in & taba taba'in.. They are not laymen who transferred the knowledge but the hadith sciences are so strict which makes the hadith collections more authentic than any other historical records. That's what Allah swt is saying to follow the Prophet.. Rejecting the life & sayings of the prophet certainly makes you munafiq if not kafir.

@wim develder Imām Bukhari didn't make up hadīth. There was hadīth written during the time of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. The hadīth were also memorised (the two ways in which the hadīth were preserved was memorisation and being written in scribes), and transmitted generation to generation. Imām Bukhari compiled hadīth into a book, making it easy to access hadīth.

@wim develder how does him being a persian makes him unreliable????? All of his contemporaries have testified for his honesty and faith, the man has done an immense job in compiling the hadiths and done his best in ensuring they were authentic.

@wim develderCompiled and collected by Persians doesn’t make the hadiths unauthentic. Have respect for people.

@wim develder all of the arabs and the non arabs have sought his works because they know him to be truthful, he didn't make up the hadith, they're all hadiths which were famously propagated since the time of the prophet.

I agree with you 100% But say that in a muslim country and they would jail/kill you. It's silly how they made Muhammed in some way over God and other way next to God.

@@ibrahim-qk7ii Absolutely and that’s why their sect is dominant, because it’s backed by governments since day 1.

Yes, there's no such thing as how to do ruku how to do sujud, which one comes first ruku or sujud. The explanation only in Hadith.

who prays three times a day?? are you sure she's a Muslim, not a jew?

@@NadDew I don't want to offend you but I think that God gave me enough intelligence to make the difference between a Muslim and a Jew. There are different types of Quranist; some pray five times a day, some three times, there are those who believe the Salaat is not a ritual prayer which Muslims must preform daily.

@@Matt-kf4ec I didn't mean to be rude, I was being sarcastic about how absurd their logic was, never had been in Islamic history a sect that made "a discount" on prayers...

@@ahmadfaruk8562 Birds and all in the heavens do sujood and ruku, do they bow down physically or are in complete obedience to the way Allah has programmed into them? By following and submitting to Allah 24/7, you are 'bowing down' to Him, mentally as well as physically, and this explanation is only in the Qur'an for those who submit to Allah.

What you claim as best way it’s actually hell way. Shirk way. Quran is the first and last. The rest is culture or part of history take it or leave it, won’t effect your deen.

@@adelseddouki3375 no he's right, The best people are my generation, then the people who come after them, then the people who come after them." [Al-Bukhari, and Muslim] In another very important hadith, the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said: "The tribes of Israel broke up into seventy-two sects. My ummah shall break up into seventy-three sects. All of them will be in the Fire except for one: [That group] which follows what I and my Companions are following." [At-Tirmidhi]

Wow, thank you!

I second that!! Soothing to the ears and mind. Like the favorite teacher in the Uni, who's classes you wouldn't wanna miss!

Thank you and well said! I differ with Paul’s stance on this one. He does quote hadiths in his videos but I hope that no matter how eloquent they are and spot on the topic, they are not laws rather just words of wisdom. It amazes me how Muslims are so easily falling for the same scheme: Jews have their Talmud that deviated them from the Thora, Christians have their “Gospels according to this and that” that became the New Testament with all the contradictions it brought vs the Injeel and now… Guess what… we have Hadiths that contradict the Quran yet are blindly followed by a majority of Muslims. History is repeating itself yet we can’t see it and are very eager to point our finger at other people’s issues. I am not a Quranist or wear any label. Not a au min or Shia or whatever just a person who believes in Allah and His message as ordained in His Quran.

@@BaniAadama Thank you! I indeed appreciate your comments.

@JurrassicBombastic cry cry cry

@JurrassicBombastic no, Allah knows what is best for us.

@JurrassicBombastic whats wrong with obeying ? See we obey prophet ... hence obeying God , cause God told so ... im not even obeying you when you told people dont obey lol

@JurrassicBombastic Yes obey, obey, obey. Are you prefer rebel, rebel, rebel? What can you do to rebel from the creator of the universes?

@JurrassicBombastic Well, decision back to everyone. I'm not responsible for your sins, and neither you are responsible for my sins.

always take quran as highest authority in islam

i agree with you ,, i would say rather i am humbled and thankful to be guided and thanks to Allah swt to guide me to the right path and protect us from the shaytan and increase our knowledge inshAllah

@@danmanny6083 Unfortunately you would be considered a rebel according to most sects. And what great and brave rebel you are. You would be closer to Allah than soudaissi make prayers on kaaba.👍

You're looking for a Mishnah. 2:68 & 18:54-8.

👍👍👍👏👆

Excellent. Add 25:30 and 6:114 to these.

@@gobbledygook99 What a fun game! 50:45!!!!! 25:33!!! 50:45 We know best whatever they say, and you (O Messenger) are *not* one to compel them (to faith). So remind and warn *by the Qur’an* him who fears My threat. 25:33 [The Haqq] [Best Tafsīran تَفْسِيرًا ] Wa laa yaatoonaka bimasainn illaa ji'naaka *bilhaqqi* wa *ahsana tafseeraa* And they do not come to you with an argument except that We bring you *the* truth and *the* best explanation. - following on from 25:30

Brilliantly said, absolutely amazing comment. May God bless you for taking the time to write this.

How do you know what he did or didn't say if you reject Hadith? You wouldn;'t even be able to understand the Quran without the Sunnah to explain many of the legal rulings within it, or the context of the verses and why they were revealed. And the Quran also shows the Prophet sallahu alayhi wassalam received revelation and commands outside of the Quran. 1 of the clear examples being the Qibla being in Jerusalem. Allah says in Surah Al Baqarah he appointed that Qibla for the Muslims before changing it to Mecca, yet there is no verse of the Quran that commands praying towards Jerusalem. The Prophet sallahu aalayih wassalam came to explain the Quran, implement it and teach people the religion. That is what the Sunnah is. If we follow the "Quranist" way, we would have to figure it out for ourselves and there would be a 1000 diffeerent sects and groups all trying to interpret things for themselves. Allah has said we are the best of Ummahs raised for mankind, so unless you're claiming Allah allowed the entire Ummah to go astray from the very beginning of Islam, and only you hadith rejectors who are a recent group are the right ones, then you are with all due respect, very dellusional.

@@mikk3150 I never reject hadith ,what I took to it is the important message from the prophet not his tradition alone but the teaching way of life.

@@mikk3150 and I forgot nowhere in quran says that quibla is in mecca of saudi arabia but later tradtionalist.

@@rassb3427 Ok so what is the true Qibla than referenced in the Quran?

@Hamza Akram I'm not interested in anything he has to say. I want answers from you. what is the Qibla if not Mecca? Clearly you know this religion better than te sahaba who spread Islam all over the world and taught the people.

Your right path is the wrong path for someone else. Vs versa. You can’t ever go wrong if you say I only follow Quran. If you tell Allah I only trust you and I can’t trust people. You will never be asked for anything other than what’s in the Quran.

wow!

You are so kind

I've been wondering the same thing. I'm a very slow reader.

Wich one? his commentary on "al waraqat"?

@@user-fl1cr7ro2p the book mentioned in this video

with "inheritence' I mean the will of the inherrited.

thank you!

All turd books, massive excretement against Islam

@@oceanmachine1906 Or so you believe...

Hold on to the sentiments that brought you to Islam, they will help guide you within Islam as well. _"And those who strive in Us, We will surely guide to our paths ..."_

bukhari is just the compiler lol, he just compiles the hadiths, the hadith are where the sunnah and actions are

We are not following him, we're following the hadith he compiled.

@@bensirach3586 9:101 Among the Arabs around you, there are hypocrites. Also, among the city dwellers, there are those who are accustomed to hypocrisy. You do not know them, but we know them. We will double the retribution for them, then they end up committed to a terrible retribution. So, the prophet doesn't know who are hypocrites among the people whom he knows personally, but Bukhari, knows for sure, over the course of 200 years, who is telling the truth, and who isn't "trustworthy". How do you reason?

@@tideturns4811 Again, the words that Bukhari compiled in his book aren't his words, but the words of companions of the Prophet(PBUH) that heard it from Muhammad(PBUH) himself. Muhammad, being a only a human, wouldn't have superhuman knowledge of every believer's faith. However, given that he is a prophet of God, it would be Reveled by Allah what what is a hypocrite and what to do with them, and he would explain it to muslims so that they know also. I don't why you'd think that Allah would revel these verses and yet also not enlighten the Prophet(PBUH) about the finer details.

@@bensirach3586 Wrong! Bukhari never met any of the "companions", nor the "tabi'in", all he heard (maybe) were some random Arabs. He allegedly collected 600 000 hadith (maybe he was using internet), rejected 99% of hadith and included about 7 000 with repetitions. But there are no originals of Bukhari...actually search for it... hadith are pretty much an equivalent of Talmud (actually they contain same things) ... And, most important, they are SHIRK! If you truly believe, do a long and detailed search.

Learn to make paragraphs lol

@wim develder where else will you get authentic sunnah of the prophet???

@wim develder May Allah guv you hidayat

@wim develder you can't extinguish the light of God and His Rasool saw. May Allah Subhawatalah give you hidayat

@wim develder The companions of the prophet s.a.w, practiced the sunnah or ahadith and transmitted orally to later generations. untill the reign of Abdul Malik bin Marwan ( 685 AD ) who gave order for the compilation or collection of the ahadith of the Prphet. Later writers also compiled and collected to the best of their knowledge. The bukhari and Muslim are foremost of those true authectic form of the Sunnah, agreed upon by Sunni Muslims. If u are not Sunni you may have different story. Thats upto you.

@wim develder if the hadith forbids sth we forbid it and if it orders sth we do it. Thats how to practice. You sound like you know little about Islam bro. Goodbye

best innovators of their time

@@user-jc3zt9dx2b saw a you tube video of Imam hanbali n the Mu'tazila were causing fitnah by saying the Quran was created by Allaah n Imam Hanbal gave them proof that it was the word of Allaah

And what should we think about every Muslim nation issuing currency with interest?

@SalafiDawah It seems the Quran's prohibition on riba is not 🤔

How do you know that you have the Quran that was given to the prophet Muhammad historically?

@@cissejr7695 Hi Cisse If you are seeking the truth .. then read more books and watch more videos . Paul is doing good if you want to know Have a nice day 😊

Hello there!

It is, but is that the Islam of the Quran?

@@astroflyinsights of course. The Quran and Sunnah compliment each other.

@@astroflyinsights yes

My brother don't talk to them, they (quranists) are confused people. Talking to them, will rubb off onto you

ترجمة بالعربية موجودة