I know that your comment is old, but that is what I try to make atheists understand. If they're going to appeal to things like an "infinite multi-verse" or some such thing, where every physical potential is actualized, then there exists, by necessity things like teapots, and anything else that's not physically impossible.

That is such a stupid statement. Everything has a beginning

@@horsehung9471 How far back do those beginnings go? If everything has a cause, you must think about what caused each thing and the thing before it, etc. etc.. It goes back in time infinitely. There must be something eternal, something that was not created, that made the first domino fall. That thing is God, and He has the ability to reveal himself to us.

Things that atheist put their trust in like evolution has been disproved by evolution but yet people believed this demonic theory without proof, but yet they want evidence for GOD!? m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mr2ieMarq8fdl58.html

bullshit

It's literally the exact opposite. They're inferring God as an explanation for things they do understand. These are called the logical rules of inference, maybe look them up sometime. If we know that X can't exist eternally for example, and X cannot create itself, and X cannot come from absolutely nothing, then we can infer that X has a cause, and if X is equal to all physical reality, then we can infer that its cause is from a non-physical reality. It's nothing to do with not understanding things, it's that we understand them extremely well. The things that atheist scientists, and atheists in general don't understand are subjects like logic, philosophy etc, so the arguments make no sense to them. Atheism is literally usually a result of lake of understanding.