What police state?

@@wesleytaylor-rendal5648 I guess you must be too young to have watched police in this country become militarized, or too ill-informed to know that every phone call you make, every email you send, is recorded and permanently stored by the NSA, or that every location you have been to if you have a cell phone is recorded to within a few feet. The push is on now for an all-digital currency so every purchase you make is recorded, too, and they can lock you out of your account if you say the wrong thing. Obama's _Project Choke Point_ already started that by denying banking services to businesses they didn't like, primarily LEGAL firearms-related businesses. Censorship is at an all-time high. You can claim that the Big Tech companies are private, but they're really functioning as the Ministry of Propaganda and Ministry of Truth arms of the DNC.

@@hshs5756 As gangs have become more heavily armed, so to have the police. Regarding the tracking. I think companies like Google and Apple are complicit. I witnessed the censorship of Winston Churchill from a list of British prime ministers from Googles list of uk Prime ministers. The point being here is its not our country (or USA) doing this shit. It's ideological corporations, the same corporations that buy politicians (DNC). I'm of the opinion they are pissed that they aren't in complete control. Thus the chaos we are witnessing.

@@wesleytaylor-rendal5648 These "ideological corporations" couldn't do what they're doing without the full complicity of a certain faction in the government, or a government-corporate partnership -- which is part of the definition of fascism.

Costs folks like you and me.

"The only value men can offer a woman is their ability to support her and her children." Do you agree with this one? I'm just curious is all. Thanks. (;

@@rinalore9416 If you are implying that this is a quote from Rand, I would love to see it in context because - NO - that statement, by itself, is NOT something I would agree with. Please provide a source so I can see that quote in context.

@@johnnynick6179 No, I wasn't implying that.

Same

Yes,my son saw it on a neighbors car,down the rabbit hole I go.....see you on the other side.

Me too!!! Haha🤣🤣

ME TOO GOING DOWN I-95

Yes Meto that's hilarious

You do deserve it but only if you earned it

your imagination

Oh. ITS,.. in MaraLARDO crying his blotted ass off 😂

@@My-Pal-Hal he must have taught you to spell!

@@MrCountrycuz But didn't teach you to read between the lines. ...not that you can read 🤤

How is jon Galt

You're confusing reason with effect. Overall, it's the many who drive civilization forward and make few succesful. How succesful would a Henry Ford have been, if no one would've worked for him? How big a company would Ford be today, if it wasn't for the hundreds and thousands of poor factory workers, who had to take any work, no matter how dangerous or ill-paid the job was, just to barely feed their families? How big would Hugo Boss be, if they didn't use jewish slaves during WW2 and manufactured trenchcoats for the nazis? What you call "success" is what I call the result of exploitation. Kings, Queens, Emperors, the wealthiest people and the most successful business men, no one can be successful alone. We can't even survive alone. Without company, without someone who takes care of us, humans die. Pretty fast and pretty easily. We can't remove our own appendix, we can't protect ourselves when we are sick or asleep, we live in a permanent dependency from others. The second we're born we need someone to take care of us. "Individual freedom" is an illusion. There is no individual freedom as there is no individual life. There is no life without affecting or being affected by others. And even if it's only the place of your random birth, because well, that's where your mom was at the time, or someone who paved the road you walk on. We're born into dependency, and can never escape it. We need to eat, we need to drink, we get sick, we get old, there's no freedom in life. There is no "I can do whatever I want.". Well, actually, there is and you can. But it will have consequences, and those might severely inflict with your initial freedom.

Not tree fiddy?

@@lughlongarm653 - Your that gol danged Lock Ness Monster! I ain't givin' you no damned tree fitty!

No Liz - it's NOT the billionaires that have gone on strike. They billionaires are the ones YOU are supporting by giving power to the government, who then sells it to the highest bidder. The people who are "on strike" are people like me - small business owners who employed people with good-paying jobs until YOU allowed government to pass laws giving billionaires the ability to put the rest of us out of business. Now it's spreading to others who are "quiet quitting" because they don't see the value in working hard only to be FORCED to support those who don't work. There are now tens of thousands of us "on strike." Think of us every time you hear someone say they can't find a really good auto mechanic - or an honest Realtor - or a caring doctor - or an efficient business manager. People who are capable of THINKING are learning that WE DON'T NEED YOU. YOU NEED US.

How's it going ?

@@covidenslavement8918 I am ready to move forward, but need public consent before I change the world. This is ironic, because I answered this message while viewing a song "i did not consent" lol I am the man who will win the 2024 US Presidential election by a landslide victory as a write in party free candidate, I guess things are going to keep getting better?

Keep smokin it​@@alexandrosfilth7042

@@alexandrosfilth7042 Good luck with that. Keep us posted on your progress.

@@johnnynick6179 if we do not organically unite no one will like the outcomes. This isn't debatable. I don't need luck. Everyone knows what will happen if you don't write in my name in Nov.

More like Rearden.

@@TheRak95 - More so then Galt? It is a good comparison but Readen created a metal alloy, but you are correct everything he does works. Musk is into everything.

Spread the word. We must

Tesla was real.

Different strokes for different folks. I greatly enjoyed her writing style. I find the serious Russian authors to be severe, pedantic and long winded, but Ayn was "Russian literature lite". The only aspect of her writing I didn't enjoy were the love scenes which are straight up actualized rape fantasies.

Dostoevsky, Nabokov & Tolstoy are easy reads IMO.

@@harrisonbergeron9119 - You're apparently a Kurt Vonnegut fan.

I am not shocked because she has always advanced the individual, the self and so on. Her end of life proved that we are a village, we are a tribe and we have to help each other. She disproves her own theory by living on social security until she died. Hypocrisy Much!!!

Baloney. Search the issue and you'lll find: in the last years of her life, Ayn Rand was able to afford an apartment in New York, a live-in maid, a personal secretary, and retained the services of a law firm. She was still paying enough in income taxes that any Social Security payments she received served only as a small income tax deduction. A small one. She was still earning an income from book royalties and speaking fees. People were still willing to pay money to hear her speak. When she contracted cancer in 1974 it was a few years before she was eligible for Medicare, yet she was able to pay for the surgery and treatments, and on top of that she paid for her brother-in-law’s heart surgery. When she died, she left $550K in her will. New York Times Article 024270 -- No Title (Published 1982) The novelist Ayn Rand left an estate estimated at $550,000 to a friend, Leonard Peikoff of Manhattan, according to a will filed for probate in Manhattan Surrogate's Court. Miss Rand, the author of ''The Foutainhead'' and ''Atlas Shrugged,'' died March 6 at the age of 77. www.nytimes.com/1982/03/28/nyregion/article-024270-no-title.html That she died poor is just a smear story spread by her haters.

@@onibioh wrong! Search the issue and you'lll find: in the last years of her life, Ayn Rand was able to afford an apartment in New York, a live-in maid, a personal secretary, and retained the services of a law firm. She was still paying enough in income taxes that any Social Security payments she received served only as a small income tax deduction. A small one. She was still earning an income from book royalties and speaking fees. People were still willing to pay money to hear her speak. When she contracted cancer in 1974 it was a few years before she was eligible for Medicare, yet she was able to pay for the surgery and treatments, and on top of that she paid for her brother-in-law’s heart surgery. When she died, she left $550K in her will. New York Times Article 024270 -- No Title (Published 1982) The novelist Ayn Rand left an estate estimated at $550,000 to a friend, Leonard Peikoff of Manhattan, according to a will filed for probate in Manhattan Surrogate's Court. Miss Rand, the author of ''The Foutainhead'' and ''Atlas Shrugged,'' died March 6 at the age of 77. www.nytimes.com/1982/03/28/nyregion/article-024270-no-title.html That she died poor is just a smear story spread by her haters.

Micheal Jackson

You are lost

Bro you just assumed me of something according to my race that is racist my friend

Classic chronic victimhood.

“you have to earn it yourself” yep sounds like white privilege. “they can earn it for us” wonder who that would be 🤔

@@joeyripswell "You have to Earn It Yourself". Most Ignorant, self obsessed Comment Ever 😂 ... precious ...