Well I should say congrats for winning!

they should be honored to have the #1 cedh player on their channel

It was hard to find all of them but I found some off them.

Awsome presentation form you and great work getting there.

Your welcome Zain. Thanks for helping with the video.

But eventually you will ... right :P

@@cedhtv I only play in person events, so it'll be slow. Eventually:)

your welcome! and GZ for being on the list. You did that not me.

Big congrats man. Well earned. I hope this helps your channel.

@@cedhtv that means a lot to me 🥹 thanks!

YES!

wow thank you!

Deep down I will say YES! hahaha

Your welcome! Or well you did that work.

your welcome!

Thank you glad you like it.

Thank you. There have been updates. We do have a new best player. But I think a lot of players might get into the list this year. A lot of players are close to 10 tournaments.

There is a P-value t-test in here if that is what your asking for? But it is just WINS vs LOSS and DRAWS = Winrate. Really simple math.

Gotcha. Overall I was just curious what stats you ran. I assumed you had performed a student's t-test (or one-way ANOVA) but wasn't sure if you had done any corrections for multiple comparisons. Love the video, thanks!

I did look at you. I don't remeber on top of my head but your close to enter into 10 tournaments I guess.

@@cedhtv yeah think im only on 4 / 5 entries. I'll be back next year XD. I expect an update next Christmas 😜

thank you!

Saddly no. But he will be happy to read this.

The biggest reason for the list being large us people is that the tournament scene is way more developed there. They have more events, online events don't end 4 in the morning for them etc. This affects them in a couple of ways. They have more events so making the 10 event threshold is way easier. Having more events also means that being good is more worthwhile since you have the events to go out and try to earn money basically encouraging grinders to go harder. I don't really think the skill gap is larger there but the scene is way more developed

What pontus said is the big reason why I don't play in many or any cEDH online tournaments. I don't like staying up that late.

I agree with both of you. The other reason I don't like online events is also the ways people cheat in them. And when the stakes are high, the incentive gets proportionally higher as well. It's a deep rabbit hole in terms of conversation, but I don't think online tournaments are to be evaluated same as in-person tournaments (and I could make a lot of arguments for that). Either way - I do agree that the disparity in skill is probably similar as in EU. I just made an assumption based on my experience. I would really love to see some of these players play in EU pools and see if it affects them at all. For me, just going to compete at Pirate Chest II was a surprising experience - the meta somewhat different from what I expected. But still - it feels surprising to me that people can perform so consistently (multiple back-to-back wins), especially as outlined above - I'd reckon they'd get at least prioritized in threat assesment. But who knows. I don't have many international in-person events under my belt, but for main event at PC2, I didn't do well (granted, lots of unlucky coincidences), but I won the side event (at 57? people - for some reason, the bracket is not available anywhere). Still - I think performing like this, consistently, would be very unlikely.

Thank you. That means a lot.

There was a lot of names to showcase.

@@cedhtv It's fine mate honestly, I'm just happy to make the list at all

Thank you!

Thank you! I will do my best.

Thank you! Glad you liked it.

Yeah haha I have a feeling some of the comments from that didn't watch it. But that is ok. It was fun to read their comments.

Sadly the 2 Wins last year were before the edhtop16 was created

He actually have a really long name. but it was just to long.

That will make him happy. but spoilers no :(

In the long list of 910?

How many tournaments have you played? Also what is your name on EDH TOP 16. I can look at your winrate. Or well TOP EDH !& letäs you do that on your own.

@@cedhtvoh I’m Larry hahah

Ofc. You deserv it.

I have some plans of interviews of with these players more or less. Or some of these players from this list.

@@cedhtv I assure you, if you can get these 2 Finnish guys in a videocall it's gonna be a wild ride. I am legit convinced that the only thing these guys do is play vs eachother and study the format.

Happy to read that!

You are correct. But the only player with a significant p-value was 3 players ... And we are more or less just making a rankings of players an how they have preformed. Yes we are kinda asking the question who is the best player in the world kinda. But the ranking order is still correct becous when you play a game the winner is the winner out of outcome. Even if the data dosen't suggest that this player is going to be the best player in the future again it is the player with the best winrate now.

Saddly no but he will be happy to read this.

You guys are EASILY the most fun to watch! I've been playing since '93 and you're the first channel to which I ever subscribed.@@cedhtv

lmao no

@@sPontusone day 😊

Ofc your relevent!

GZ!

Oh that will hurt. You will have 2 different players more or less. all touranemnts with 30+ players in them more or less. But not all commanders jet. There are a few commanders with only 3 games so to say.

I just went through my EDHTop16 results and found that I have 11 tournaments under "Dan Brooks" with a record of 16-29-12 and 4 tournaments under "Daniel Brooks" with a record of 7-13-1, for a total of 23-42-13. So I guess I would make the list but I'd be closer to the bottom.

No don't say that!

That's what I was thinking.

How often you get a draw in a game.

I will agree to somewhat of this. We can't say with like a 100% certainty. But I it showcasing a lot of who the really proven good players are. Like anyone can say I am winning at my LGS a lot. But these players have recorded wins vs a lot of global players and a lot of games in the track records. So I do think it is saying something. But over time a lot can change.

btw i made a mistake, this was only aplicable to the extended list. good video in all@@cedhtv

Great answer! I was hopping people would say this.

They’re interchangeable 😊

use them. them always is right

You mean flash?

I am not going to disagree. I personally do think banning thassa could have a potential positive effect on the format. I am not sold 100% on that but I am not against it. But looking at all the data that I have. I don't see thassa currently being the card that is a must play. And that is the statement. It is a good card but you can have goon winrate without it.

@@cedhtv Everyone with a BU colors play thassa 😅 and people complain about griselbrand? Griselbrand is very fair card. You can't win on turn 1 with it .

Close.

I thought it was proved they were real? There was a lawsuit, it was peak drama 🍿 I mean is anyone surprised a discord mod claimed screenshots of them saying bad shit are fake? Discord mods lol.

Yeah no. The screenshots were real and the mods tried to cover the asses/ get rid of someone they disliked lol

@@sPontus Except all the evidence that proved they were faked and the other side bullied them with legal threats

@@Bullseyewtf Except for that no they got the transcripts from discord and confirmed it with a third party and only used legal threats since they got death threats and people calling in to their places of work trying to get them fired

@@sPontus You mean that they STATED they had a 3rd party verify everything right? without naming the 3rd party/law firm or actually showing any evidence? I get that when youre an organization you might want to keep this kind of stuff close the the chest but all I can say is that there is a full google doc of evidence against eminence that looks VERY damning and eminence has given a statement that amounts to "yeah we looked into it and its actually all good".

He is on the list. Definatly up there.