I❤ listening and learning from you! This is so great! Baruch HaShem!

True. Repeating what you learned at school. I was so fortunate to be attracted by Judaism ✡️. Eye opening experience for ever.

Thank you, William Hall, for level, fair, unbiased programing. Tovia is simply an emotional saint and mental genius.😇

I am not a Christian but everything that you have said connects to the teachings of my father and grandfather...More power to you Tovia Singer...

I’m brand new to this channel and I’m absolutely loving it. As a completely separate non religious question, what is the song at the end of each video. Thank you.

That was so very interesting: it is funny because christians have so much to learn - from you!! Thank You.

It is crystal clear that the gospel authors intended to give the Jews a very bad name and ultimately bring an end to Judaism but they failed woefully

Thanks to many of your messages on KZfaq quite truth revealing

Dear Tovia Singer. I'm an ex-muslim and I am very thankful for the content you are putting out. I'm curious about all religions and its very hard to find sources that explain Judaism without being polluted by Politics or History. I watched a lot of Rabbis talking trying to understand what Judaism is truly about but only you made it clear. You are truly pure and Universal and may God bless you.

Thanks!

Thank you Rabbi!

Thank you rabbi...true hero!

GOD say don't put trust in the flesh u will be curse! Jeremiah.

Thank you Rabbi

Hearing you speak really confirm my Jewish belief! ✡️

Very interesting. I will definitley be watching some more. I was a little surprised that in a discussion about Paul's views, there was no mention of the fact that about half of Paul's epistles are known to be pseudepigrapha.

Paul also wrote " Jumanji"

Todah Rabba!

I remember hearing Prof. Paula Fredriksen answer a question about Paul's character and she replied, "Put it this way, if he asked my daughter in marriage,the answer would be no" emphasis added. Much to what Rabbi Singer described.

Paul's Epistles were written prior to the Gospels! There are so many parallels between Paul and Jesus, particularly in Acts. He seems to believe himself as The Christ- As in Gal 6:17 I would not be surprised, if Jesus was constructed from Paul's writings 🧐

Book of Mark was the first book. Mark is a Roman name Marcus, which means consecrated to the god Mars the god of Rome…. Romans writers created Jesus

I’m no. 300 baby! You’re the man Rabbi Singer. We love ya!!!

This content is gold. As an x-moslem i try to read as much as i can about other religions. Sadly there is not much quality content, dialogues on Judaism. I'll appreciate if you can share some good sources like podcast, dislogues etc. I try to listen while i drive.

Merci beaucoup pour la vérité monsieur rabbi shalom

Paul the false prophet!😅

Hate to admit it but Rabbi has strong evidence and knowledge on this matter. I have to say that I have my doubt on Paul where the Rabbi explanation answers most of my own curiousities since many years ago.

You are right Rabbi.

I very much respect how well-read rabbi Tovia is. I'm a devout Christian who will never, ever apostatize BUT I respect anyone who has actually taken the time to read The Holy Bible and tried to make sense of it rather than seethe in utter contemptment of the faith and dismissing it outright.

What should current Christians do? Convert to Judaism????

Onto us a child is born and a son is given. The Lord has already granted forgiveness, but some remain unbelievers.

" " G d bless you Rabbi, Wil'liam... written to get people to believe in Jesus yes but also to condemn the Torah of Moses, the observant Rabbis and children of Israel and damn/destroy/malign Judaism.

Qur’an 2:113- The Jews say, "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the Scripture. Thus do those who know not [i.e., the polytheists] speak the same as their words. But Allāh will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that over which they used to differ.

Acretions, embelleshments, interpolations, in other words it was a case of playing broken telephone. But, who would or could figure that out in that period of history? Only the educated elites, privileged people, the social engineers of their day.

Why are there hundreds of variant versions of the Christian bibles none used match the earliest original koine Greek new testament or Hebrew sources? Bizarre

Thank you rabbi

Acts was written in Greek, presumably by St. Luke the Evangelist. The Gospel According to Luke concludes where Acts begins, namely, with Christ's Ascension into heaven. Acts was apparently written in Rome, perhaps between 70 and 90 ce, though some think a slightly earlier date is also possible.

The better and more relevant question is who wrote the Quran? That is the question. Please answer that I would like to hear your response.

1:51 Codex Vaticanus is, as the name implies, a Codex. _"Julius Caesar may have been the first Roman to reduce scrolls to bound pages in the form of a note-book, possibly even as a papyrus codex.[17] At the turn of the 1st century AD, a kind of folded parchment notebook called pugillares membranei in Latin became commonly used for writing in the Roman Empire.[18] Theodore Cressy Skeat theorized that this form of notebook was invented in Rome and then spread rapidly to the Near East.[19]"_ _"Codices are described in certain works by the Classical Latin poet, Martial. He wrote a series of five couplets meant to accompany gifts of literature that Romans exchanged during the festival of Saturnalia. Three of these books are specifically described by Martial as being in the form of a codex; the poet praises the compendiousness of the form (as opposed to the scroll), as well as the convenience with which such a book can be read on a journey. In another poem by Martial, the poet advertises a new edition of his works, specifically noting that it is produced as a codex, taking less space than a scroll and being more comfortable to hold in one hand. According to Theodore Cressy Skeat, this might be the first recorded known case of an entire edition of a literary work (not just a single copy) being published in codex form, though it was likely an isolated case and was not a common practice until a much later time.[20]"_ _"As early as the early 2nd century, there is evidence that a codex-usually of papyrus-was the preferred format among Christians. In the library of the Villa of the Papyri, Herculaneum (buried in AD 79), all the texts (of Greek literature) are scrolls (see Herculaneum papyri). However, in the Nag Hammadi library, hidden about AD 390, all texts (Gnostic) are codices. Despite this comparison, a fragment of a non-Christian parchment codex of Demosthenes' De Falsa Legatione from Oxyrhynchus in Egypt demonstrates that the surviving evidence is insufficient to conclude whether Christians played a major or central role in the development of early codices-or if they simply adopted the format to distinguish themselves from Jews.[25]"_

In the new testament era, 'Israel' is actually all the nations settled by all 12 tribes, not just the country known as Israel. We see the 'western' nations, including Israel, being brought down a few notches as of late. The debt banking system along with banking controlled politicians, etc . has weakened those nations and the rival nations, Russia, China have pushed the issue and will continue to do so.

You need to include Marcion in any discussion of New Testament origins, Marcion's Evangelion and Mark were probably late first century and are synoptic and Matthew and Luke were early second century. Luke is a highly interpolated version of the Evangelion might be a response to Marcion, but the writer of Luke and Marcion might have used a common text, with Marcion preserving it closer to its original form and Luke, possibly using material from Matthew and other sources to embellish it. These texts are also the ones we have access to due to their preservation. There is evidence for other early writings that are now lost to us which have echos or inclusions in the surviving texts, and there were other later attempts at Gospels that have been recovered.

5:01 Joseph had died before Jesus took disciples. St. James the Theadelph obviously knew St. Joseph and who was his father as well as Our Lord's fosterfather, but he became a believer only later after the Resurrection, at least an open one. So, no reason why either Mark or John should mention him. In Luke he's mentioned in connexion with the supposal that in Mark 6 is voiced so Peter heard it. However, the guys were not mentioning Joseph who had already died.

Flavian Imperial Court intrigue sponsored the beginnings of the gospels.

what is amazing is how we read the new testament and then want to tell you about it. your so well educated, you need to teach us. We have no idea about anything other than, it makes me feel good when I am afraid or in my room, I feel like god is talking to me. maybe as a relaxing book.

4:52 There is no childhood narrative in either Mark or John. Because Peter and John both became disciples when Jesus was already an adult, and because His older fosterbrother St. James' account of the childhood was already taken in patches by Matthew and Luke, not much to go for a third or fourth Gospel taken different ones.

Never have read Paul and am quite surprised by the arrogance in the excerpt🤔 Often am curious how/why Hashem permitted Paul's destructive work!🤔

Its a crime scene.....But Rabbi Tovia is on the case!

I'm a Christian and I occasionally watch one of these videos. It might take some time, but I frequently come to realize some problem withwhat Rabbi Singer is saying. I think this is the video where he says that the gospels of the New Testament are always saying that the Jews are bad. I think that is both false and misleading. The gospels don't say that all Jews are bad. I think they point out particular Jews who do evil. For example, there is the account of Jesus chasing the "money changers" out of the Temple. The gospel does portray that as an evil thing in itself, suggesting that it may have been dishonest as well. On the other hand, various Jewish people in the New Testament are portrayed favorably. Singer describes John and Paul as people who want to persuade people, particularly Jewish people, to become followers of Christ. In much the same way, Singer is trying to persuade people to drop out of Christianity and to persuade Jews to stay Jewish. Does Singer not try to convince that all Christians are ignorant and foolish, at the least?

The Screams of the wicked like Tovia Singer will find no rest in the torment off hell!

Very simple. Look at the context. Who would have an interest in villifying the Jews when they are at a time of war against the Jews? Class? Very simple answer class.........

The funny thing about all of this is, Jesus worship the Lord God of the ark of the covenant at the second temple on the temple mount. That’s who Jesus worshipped even stated the father is greater than I meaning the Lord God of the ark of the covenant. even the Muslims, although they deny it, they worship the god of Abraham father of the Jews. and worship the god of Moses, the God that helped the Israelites and Moses cross. The Red Sea parted it in fact, so the Israelites could escape. same. God gave Moses and the Israelites, the land of Israel, the same God of Noah, the same God that king David was given the ability by to kill goliath, so how could there be a different God? There is only the Lord God of the ark of the covenant. That’s who God actually is in the whole world. Is going to find out simply a matter of time the Meshia will show up the third temple on the temple mount will be built and the ark of the covenant will be returned. All of the world will know that is God, and we as one world, and one people will have him to worship in his actual presence. That’s the future of this world, and many other great things not so far away, in fact.❤DALE. I AM WHO I AM. Is The Lord GOD. Simple truth

Totally misunderstood dear Rabbi. If you accuse Paul, the highly literate Jew of first century, if you don't understand Paul, you don't understand anything.

I will liken paul to the pharaoh of Egypt.paul changed from prosecuting followers of jesus to a follower of jesus.after the pharaoh suffered the greatest defeat of his life he went all over in his kingdom and beyond telling people what happened to him and the mighty army urged people to serve and believe in the God of israel.

I think when we are talking about the NT, we should not assume that what we see today is the 1st century originals. We don’t know what the original 1st copies said. What we have today as the NT, is of earliest the fourth century, or even later, well in the age of the Roman Church. So what we factually have is a product of the Roman Church, and to understand the purpose of this NT, it must be understood in de context and purpose of the Roman Church, which is in all means a political-religious institution/instrument. Scholars shouldn’t just see the NT in the lens of archeology and history, but also in the lens of politics.

Herzog poses with his fancy watch many times. Many of them do.

through the Noahide covenant this ex- Christian learned to love the Jews. You are right about Paul. He was a megalomaniacal mystic and gnostic looking to start his own religion and live on in history. He succeeded.

I had a pastor told me that we are to follow Paul's teachings and not jesus's Paul was an occultist himself just like these Freemasons today "the same people"

All are created in HIS image. We all should love HIM with our heart, soul, mind, body. HE is HOLY GHOST, incarnate in the body as GSUS, immutable forever. may GSUS quicken your dead spirit & make it holy. Joshua tells us of meeting GSUS before Jericho was conquered. GSUS brings hope the world can't give & the world can't take away

The observance of the Jewish religious laws was an important issue in the first century when Paul was writing to the churches. I believe that the second coming of Jesus was also expected to happen imminently, like, say, the first century. Jesus still hasn't returned bodily. I don't understand why it is taking so long, unless Jesus was misquoted, or something terrible happened to him in Heaven after his ascension or Jesus was mistaken.

Repent Rabbi Jesus is Lord

❤

Yo my bro, the ice cream man is not so happy and if he don’t get what he wants, he will back down. I’d advise don’t trust in the US but trust in God. The time is ticking. It’s going to be painful for my fellow Jews, but fear not stay strong and believe. This is one wicked world, and we all need to come back to the Almighty!!

Luke 24:44-48 Then he (God=Jesus) said, “When I was with you before, I told you (His disciples , eye witnesses) that everything written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and in the Psalms must be fulfilled.” Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures. And he said, “Yes, it was written long ago that the Messiah would suffer and die and rise from the dead on the third day. It was also written that this message would be proclaimed in the authority of his name to all the nations, beginning in Jerusalem: ‘There is forgiveness of sins for all who repent.’ You are witnesses of all these things.

Peter Paul Luke John and Matthew Mark plus a few other Apostles they wrote it so Jews and Rabbis can accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior so they don't go to hell and live life more abundantly!! AMEN!!

The New Teatament is letters and documentary of the Apostle and decilples. I believe that they chose what they wanted to be in those books to accommodate the Greek customs of that Day. The TORAH is the only written document given to Moses from Hashem at Mt Siani.

Baruch HaShem 🙏🏽✡️🌈

The book of Revelations was written by a Greek called John having visions in a cave a bit like Mohammed was Paul still considered himself a Pharisee but I guess what we would call these days a woke one cause he had done away with all the rituals

5:54 There are two candidates, if you look at early tradition. St. Irenaeus, who left Asia Minor at 16, affirms the Gospeller was the Son of Zebedee, one of the Twelve. Those left back in Asia Minor do not seem to think so. One of them, defending 14th of Nisan, refers to a John "who wore the golden headband" meaning he probably served as Cohen Gadol one of the years in the Temple.

I would like to know what is the song at the end of the videos

Mr. Tovia why is Christianity worshiping idols, it is forbidden of Moses law?

The gospel prototypes were written after '"paul's" early prototypes.

Looking at some of the ways paul wrote Christianity it seams like paul isn't just talking to Christians but also to jews. While jews don't believe in hell they can believe that christians contribute to good character. Paul explains why the idea of hell is useful even though it's nonsense. Like for example the idea of hell gets rid of the idea of richuals and the purpose behind it. It also helps us think that Gods word can be spread through words rather then metaphors or creation. And when we leave Christianity to become jews we have more value in the thought of no hell and no war.

What role (influence) did the Jewish War of 66 to 70/73ACE and its aftermath have in a possible late first and early second century Christian desire to disassociate themselves from the Jews in the greater Roman world as well as cause the formation of the various canonical Gospels (there are others)?

A minute you tell me these things were authored by highly literate people at the end of the first century . In the next second, Mark did not know of the virgin birth. What I get from you is inconsistency. Secondly, failure to mention is not a proof of anything. I've been trying to find a true religion but when it comes to new testament, I get a lot of inconsistencies. you use it to justify your cause and completely disregard when it doesn't. Maybe all religions are just the same

Who wrote and how the books of the New Testament were written continues to be a matter of debate between secular modernist scholars and traditionalist scholars. How each group views the documents depends on that group's underlying assumptions. They are using exactly the same documents and archaeological findings regarding the early Jesus community, as well as the context of Greco-Roman culture and Second Temple Judaism, yet coming up with different conclusions. Since none of the scholars were actually there at the time, such disagreement is entirely foreseeable.

The Christian Apostle Paul never existed as he was really none other than the great Apollonius of Tyana, whom Paul was modeled after. Apollonius established churches around the Mediterranean to the Hindu god Chrishna. In Greece he was called Christos, and morphed into the Christian Jesus Christ. For the complete story read Antiquity Unveiled and portions of Oahspe.

John and Matthew were with Jesus- what are you talking about??. John said " We've SEEN his glory, the glory of the One and Only who came from the Father full of grace and truth" (John 1:14)

3:39 That's like saying "we have no way of knowing Moses was the son of Amram" We know that because of the Hebrew tradition, 2000 years ago common to those who were already Samaritans, those who became what we now call Jews and those who became Christians. We know the authors were Hebrews, except St. Luke. For Hebrews, two suggestions involve Sts Paul and Barnabas, both disciples to Gamaliel. For the Johannine corpus, the majority position in tradition says "the son of Zebedee" while Fr. Jean Colson has made an argument the author is not one of the twelve, but instead a Cohen.

The Apostles, all of whom were Jewish and adherents to Judaism.

Paul 1st century televangelist

3:06 It's years since I went through St. Paul's letters, but if your impression is "the big issue is if Christians have to keep the commandments" this gives a very huge impression that St. Paul's followers were in a big part of Jewish ethnicity.

The best explanation I've ever read for the authorship of the New Testament is in Joseph Atwill's book 'Caesar's Messiah'. Jesus was a creation of the Emperor Titus (gathering Jewish intellectuals together in his court) in the wake of the Jewish Wars to give the Jews a peace-loving messiah instead of a warlike one.

Out of the Ten commandments ( leave aside the whole law), how many do you follow -- one? Two?

I believe that the writers of the books of the New Testament did not in any way conspire with each other. They also had no intention of writing a "New Testament" meaning a new Bible. It only became "The NT" when all books selected to be included were canonized in the 4th Cent. I believe that the Jewish authors that wrote accounts about Jesus' life and teachings, wrote them along the lines of the Jewish Agadata or Medrash, never intending that the books be considered holy.

The messiah to the Essenes did commit spiritual warfare on Mt. Hermon, once home of the giant king Og of Bashan. Proclaimed to be the gates of hell. This mountain in Israel is closest to the Euphrates and Tigris. It homes a NATO base that is closest to Heaven, Prince William once served there. Why is this mountain so peculiar? Bashan is said over 50 times in Tanach, Moses called King Og a spiritual concubine in Deuteronomy 3:11. Christians are accused of Gnosticism, their only right half the time because Hebrews 2:16 runs very contradictory to any sect of Gnosticism who have a tendency to worship angels. The resurrection is for the salvation of all mankind, NOT angels or elohim. Is it just coincidence that the war of Genesis 14 was against the giants by none of Abraham’s sons? Jesus definitely was militant, just not against people.

YES,ALL KINGS SHALL FALL DOWN BEFORE HIM; ALL NATIONS SHALL SERVE HIM ✝️🩸 { psalm 72-11}

Although Jesus is THE greatest philosopher and Teholigist, He tasks in simple terms so everybody would understand Him. If Jesus says: Your fathers ate the manna and quail in the desert and died, I AM the bread from heaven, and whoever eats the bread will have ETERNAL LIFE, John 6:38-66, the same in John 6:31-66 WHOEVER eats my flesh and drinks my blood will eternal life and I will raise Him on the last day", Jesus says this OVER AND OVER AND OVER, to the point that unbelievers grumbled and said "Who is going to eat His flesh and drinks His blood, and in John 6:66. This is why Jesus COMMANDED US to do THIS in MEMOry OF hIM, luke 22:19. Because God lives in THE Eternal Present and outside of time, it was done once and for all, so instead of evangelizing, these jews are trying to chase people away from the TRUTH. God already made it very simple for people to be saved, and since we cannot be circumcized; all we have to do is receive the spirit of God by getting baptized, and the devil HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH Jesus or God, and our souls are protected forever. Matthew 3:16.

Dear Rabbi, I need your help understanding this! I have a stone edition tanach because others said it was best, but I just found a verse that is truly disturbing to me… The more I read it the more I’m hoping it’s a bad translation… Isaiah: 52:13 & 53:10 Behold, my servant will succeed; he will be exalted and become high and exceedingly lofty. Hashem desired to oppress him and he afflicted him; if his soul would acknowledge guilt, he would see offspring and live long days and the desire of Hashem would succeed in his hand. ---------- Does this mean that the servant will be very good and that God is hurting him for amusement (desired to attack) and wants him to acknowledge his guilt? Like, is God wanting him to see him as pure evil for knowingly and intentionally hurting good for amusement? And once he sees God as pure evil he starts doing God’s will of hurting good beings too (desire of Hashem would succeed in his hand)? Am I understanding this properly? Is this a bad translation? Does God want his people to harm good beings with him?

Paul and the widow Mary of Magdala were like Will and Grace, and Peter and Matthew were like Seinfeld and Costanza, and that's why we have two religions.

Not so sure on that analysis ,Rabbi. Seems to me that the opposite could be true that what ever conversion he had was so profound that he felt he was absolutely correct. That Jesus rose from the dead, he saw him and therefore was a true believer. He believed it was therefore not nescessary to follow the old Jewish customs which put him at great odds with the Jewish people and hierarchy. That is a tough story to tell to sell people on a “new religion”. I believe that is why he started telling his story to the gentiles. Enjoying your scholarship

Paul was a Jewish rabbi in the days of Jesus

4:40 St. Peter reads alternatively from the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, skipping some, inserting some, and his secretary Mark takes notes, and this happened before St. Peter was killed by Nero and also before St. Mark came to Alexandria, as the first bishop there. This is obviously not exactly the version of the tradition given by St. Augustine, but it is the one of Clement the Stromatist, who lived, precisely, in Alexandria. _"The Stromata (Greek: Στρώματα), a mistake for Stromateis (Στρωματεῖς, "Patchwork," i.e., Miscellanies), attributed to Clement of Alexandria (c. 150 - c. 215), is the third of a trilogy of works regarding the Christian life."_ This means his life spans the following popes of Alexandria or patriarchs, or less anachronistically bishops: (8) Markianos (142-152) (9) Celadion (152-166) (10) Agrippinus (167-178) (11) Julian (178-189) (12) Demetrius I (189-232) He died after all of the following had died, the first being the Gospeller: (1) Mark the Evangelist (43-68) (2) Anianus (68-85) (3) Avilius (85-98) (4) Kedron (98-109) (5) Primus (109-121) (6) Justus (121-131) (7) Eumenes (131-141) To pretend Clement or Celadion and Agrippinus to name bishops from his youth didn't know what they were talking about won't fly.

You are confused Rabbi...the major controversy in the early Church was whether Gentiles could be admitted to the Church as Gentiles! The first council of the Church in the year 50 is recorded in Acts 15 which decided that you didn't have to be Jewish to be Christian! And the specific meaning of Catholic is...Jews first and then also the Gentiles

10:39 There is a totally different reading of Galatians 2 in Clement. The Cephas that St. Paul opposed was _not_ the Apostle Peter. Paul was simply exposing frauds, which at first he had taken for people from Jerusalem, which they then weren't. *And when they had known the grace that was given to me, James and Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars, gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship: that we should go unto the Gentiles, and they unto the circumcision:* In other words, three men pretended to be chief apostles, weren't, but as Paul didn't see the real men all that often, he was at first taken in.

I actually would say all the gospels are written in the 2md century.

The christian text is the religious fiction genre in it best form to promote its corporation. SHALOM. PAUL is a good example of a bi -polar disorder with delusions of grandeur. Also, he was very arrogant 😮.

Peace be with you, I think not all Christian or believer of Jesus hate Jews people.

So the original Gospel was not in Greek, it was in the language Jesus and his people spoke and understood. We have no record or evidence to indicate that; this original Gospel was written down by scribes under Jesus’s own supervision. I repeat: We have no original Gospel existing now as a single volume, in the original language. Every educated Christian must know this fact! (Those who are in doubt can go to the Jerome Biblical Commentary, or any authentic book by genuine scholars that deal with the subject. Nevertheless, missionaries give the impression that this is only a baseless charge by Muslims. Still, Muslims believe that the Gospels in the bible contain some teachings of Jesus, as well as the interpretations of the writers of those books, whoever they might have been. Also Muslims believe that in the words quoted from Jesus in these gospels, you come across certain ideas, which he received from God too. So the New Testament (particularly the Gospels) is valuable to the Muslims. It is valuable in that there is the word of God in it, exactly as the Old Testament (particularly the Pentateuch) is valuable to Muslims in that it contains also the word of God in it.

Paul also lied in Acts when he said that he was being arrested because of the resurrection. A flat out lie. It was about teaching against the law. Acts 21:28 ESV crying out, “Men of Israel, help! This is the man who is teaching everyone everywhere against the people and the law and this place.” Paul’s lying words: Acts 23:6 ESV - “It is with respect to the hope and the resurrection of the dead that I am on trial.”

5:27 St. Mark is also not denying He was the Son of God who became Man at His conception. It's just that he's not telling the story of that.

_"__5:52__ it's very unlikely that John 21 was __5:56__ written by whoever wrote John 20"_ What's the exact problem? _"it's __5:58__ very unlikely that whoever wrote John 6:01 1-8 mean chapter 1 verse 1 through Verse 6:04 18 also __-orth-__ [wrote the] other part it's possible __6:07__ it's just unlikely"_ Again, what is the exact problem?