The new Raptor is a joke.

@@tree356 *in your opinion*

Why is the Raptor way better than the TRX? FCA reliability issues maybe?

@@metaljew4456 disregard his statement. I’m a raptor fan but it’s clear the Trx is better.

@@jmart5302 Context. The video and the comment are about MPG and the statements should be obvious. :D

My 14 srt 300 has gotten 28.3 mpg

My 2014 Chevy Cruze 2.0l turbo diesel averages around 37 mpg and I can get in the 50s on some trips.

I have a feeling the power to weight ratio overcomes some of the raw fuel consumption. Compared to, say, the 3.6L or the 5.7L... The 5.7 is pretty rough because imo it's inefficient AND a little underpowered for what it is, and the 3.6L is efficient but a little underpowered for something like a Ram 1500. Throw the 6.4L in there, you overcome the power:weight issue, and that offsets some of the consumption

@@coleG112 I thought the same thing about the ram 1500 why not put a 392 in it like trucks too heavy for the 5.7

I would call you a damn liar - but I owned a 300 w/ 5.7 and a Charger SRT 392 w/ 6.4 and BOTH blew me away on highway gas mileage if you set adaptive cruise and stay out of the throttle (and aren't climbing serious elevation). They are both really impressive platforms.

A Day with out a Jeep is like a day without the sun

@@jamesridoni Well there's a t-shirt right there.

I’m just glad Tommy didn’t back it into something

buddy,,if you know anything about co graphs.. a volkwagon combi,is more airodynamic,that an E type jag. why,?,cos it causes its own ramp turbulence front & rear to make it a hump ,not a box.. most 1940/50,s cars were better going backwards,than forwards for co..thats co,coaficience,for you dummies..

Yeah, what he said.

I had a '95 Wrangler with a 4.0L straight 6, and a 99 TJ with a 4cyl, and for the reason you describe above, I always got way better mileage out of the 4.0L. It simply didn't have to work as hard. And by comparison, there wasn't hardly a moment where that 4cyl wasn't under tremendous strain.

not really

Hoping it goes down by next year

Dollar is getting lighter

@@grindertacos yes really. Even with US dollars inflation vehicles are out pacing it in increasing cost. The average American can not afford a $70,000 dollar vehicle. American average vehicle debt is steadily on the rise.

Car poor America. You can still buy a house for that price in some parts of the country.

It took me a sec to realize you said weekly LOL. True !

I was on the site and I think it’s 1200 a month for finance, so your number isn’t far off

@@AverageReviewsYT only if you’re suckered into 84months or somthing! Will be close to $2k at 60mo

@@DirtE30 I could probably almost pay off my 30yr mortgage in 84mos if I sent them over $2K/mo.

@@RKmndo whatcha waitin for?!

392 is essentially a 3.2l v4 when cruising, so you are not doing too bad. did you installed a bed cover? that helps a lot.

My MPI 2.5L/5spd YJ on 31s could top 20MPG in the Rockies. My 1bbl 4.2L/T150 3spd CJ7 on 33s could do about 20MPG at 55-60MPH too.

Not going to happen. Jeep wanted the ICE Wrangler to go out with a bang, hence the 392 Hemi with a forged crankshaft.

@@GlennC789 Duralube, or similar, can be a very good friend.

Not always, but fairly often sure.

give her the raptor.. or get new gf..

The MDS feature can also potentially eat Hemi camshafts. Maybe try Duralube or similar.

Me neither. But anything is possible!!

@@Origin_Stories pit

I had a '78 CJ-5 Golden Eagle with the 304 back in the early 90's. Never tracked my mpg, but didnt care in high school, lol. Man I miss that thing.

That's like $25k in today's money

My brother bought his 1977 new for $4500.00

I bought mine for $1,500, sold it for $5,000 4 years later.

Lon Oh wait, everyone driving a new jeep this summer has 392

@@dankruger2890 going to be lots of repos over the next couple years lol

@@dankruger2890 a lot of ppl also jump off bridges, sure you wanna follow? A lot of smarter things can be done with 75k

392 stands for your new credit score after you default on your wrangler loan

@@thickheart28 for 75k you could buy a new Jeep for 35k (base model) spend 20k on a complete upgrade (lift, lockers, axles, sway bar, on-board air, dual battery, etc...) and pocket the other 20k lol

Mojave especially.

I'm sure it will be coming with it stuffed in the wrangler now

It'll come.

gladiators should be a work ute,2 door,with alloy/metal tray. & v8 5 lt cummins..

Here in Ontario it is $1.20/litre or $4.80/US gallon.

@@mikefoehr235 Gotta pay for all of that free health care some how.

@@dedalliance1 That comes into play. Imagine tho...1/3 of the price of our gas is tax of some.kimd or another. Liberals in Canada is spend and tax and tax and spend. Problem is they keep spending way too much.

@@mikefoehr235 Yeah that's what liberals love to do, spend other people's money and then tell them how it's going to be spent lol. In the US, at least when we first started the idea was supposed to be there's very few taxes except for the wealthy and corporations and then the Government leaves you alone to make your own mistakes and decisions. If you don't save enough to cover your own medical expenses that's your problem. If you don't save enough for retirement that's your problem, if you don't save enough incase you lose your job that's your problem. That was what apart of being 'free' meant, to be free in making your own decision and also to be free on what you decide to spend your money on. But too bad dumb people in the US think that the Government knows better about what's good for them than they know themselves. Maybe one day we'll realize that the Government doesn't know what's best, because they've obviously screwed everything up lol.

I concur. A pretty loaded V6 Rubicon will run around $66k another $15k gets you into an amazing 392 that will hold it s resale value over time.

Wish they had put the normal 5.7 in it, to be honest.

I had a 392 in my 2014. It was an AEV conversion kit. Maintenance isn't any more difficult than he V6 except the oil filter is a little harder to get out around the steering system. Plugs go in the top of the valve covers and anymore they last a long time. The 6.4 has more grunt than the 5.7 L and with 35" to 37" tires and some altitude the Jeep can use it. My road mileage was around 16.5. I rode in this Jeep and it's more refined than mine was. Jeep did a great job on these.

One does not work on a Hemi, one simply just drives it as hard as possible

whoa man you are going too fast in a box, any wrangler max out the speedo way too easily nowadays.

Easy fix don't buy them. Let them rot on the lot.

@@ecentballer1 If you don't buy it then somebody else will.

@@gasolinediesel972 yep, somehow there's lots of people who are able to lay those prices and even mark ups. That 1% seems to be all is needed to support high prices

Of course you can,of course it does,warranty case by case.

Selectrac offers 2Hi as well. This new Selectrac isn't the same, simple, viscous-coupling NV242 tcase that was used in the XJ, KJ, and ZJ. This Selectrac system uses electronics in FT 4WD.

@@RKmndo That's interesting. And I was actually thinking of the NV247 which came with the "Quadra-Drive I". Select Trac had them all I believe (2hi, 4hi part time, 4hi full-time, Neutral, and 4 lo). Do you know which transfer case the Rubi 392 is using?

so you cant drive.?. go buy a toyota..

I think they wanted a clear difference between the 4xe and 392 and also to be on top of competition with the Bronco in terms of power.

Just about anything can exceed Toyota trucks' mpg. Their cars are great on gas, but their trucks and SUVs are stuck in the '90s and get shit mpg for their size/displacement/power.