Why Achieving Light-speed Requires Infinite Energy: Matter-waves

  Рет қаралды 234,430

But Why?

But Why?

4 жыл бұрын

This topic has been done ad nauseam.
However, I feel of the videos I've seen, they either focus too much on relativity and just time and space ceasing to exist at such a speed. Or equations showing that you would require infinite energy or have infinite mass (which is an incorrect way of looking at it) without really explaining the intuition as to WHY this happens.
It's probably not necessary to need to know about quantum physics to understand this phenomenon, but hopefully it helps expand your view on the universe.

Пікірлер: 844
@neloysinha8098
@neloysinha8098 3 жыл бұрын
I'm done with all those big channels, they just keep saying the same thing,it takes infinite energy...The wavelength thing is now I know why it is so. Saw another guys awesome video of general relativity in 3D spacetime and it had only 10k views..Man you guys deserve to have millions more
@alirezanabavian771
@alirezanabavian771 3 жыл бұрын
U r so right
@shahbazansari2798
@shahbazansari2798 2 жыл бұрын
Watch Sabine hossenfielder video's on youtube.. According to me it is the best science channel
@jurgenkoks9142
@jurgenkoks9142 2 жыл бұрын
@@shahbazansari2798 according to me I agree with Shahbaz
@akejron1
@akejron1 2 жыл бұрын
Sabine, ScienceClic English, PBS Spacetime, and Perth imho are absolutely the best places to visit. Some come close, those these 4 are my fav. "But why" is probably going to be the 5th as i see that even though small mistakes are there, explanation of the topics is pretty much one of the best i have seen. As far as GR goes ScienceClic English has the best series about it hands down. Masterpiece to say the least.
@akejron1
@akejron1 2 жыл бұрын
@You are correct But No argument there, also they are kings of Dad jokes. I would not consider them Average Joe friendly though. I am one of those Joes and still watch all their vids, so you are right, worth mentioning.
@fugitive6549
@fugitive6549 2 жыл бұрын
I have been watching physics videos on KZfaq for as long as I can remember but no one has ever bothered to explain these stuff wuite like you. You literally ask why to the most generally accepted notions in Physics realising that most ppl actually don't even understand the concepts. This is now my favourite Physics channel. Thank you. Keep up the good work
@megusta9268
@megusta9268 2 жыл бұрын
you could watch an actual physics lecture, they are quite efficient
@danmoore3660
@danmoore3660 2 жыл бұрын
@@megusta9268 How are they different?
@jewishbunnyrabbits3963
@jewishbunnyrabbits3963 2 жыл бұрын
@@megusta9268 So u just shit on everything then?
@megusta9268
@megusta9268 2 жыл бұрын
@@jewishbunnyrabbits3963 dude I'm recommending something I watch to a guy who wants to watch that sort of stuff, whats wrong?
@danmoore3660
@danmoore3660 2 жыл бұрын
@@megusta9268 I'm not a potted plant. By ignoring me you are both shitting on me. Thanks for ruining my day.
@prestonthomas9684
@prestonthomas9684 2 жыл бұрын
*puts on double pocket protector* Theoretically, you could travel to the speed of light if you were able to get rid of higgs Boson particles out of the atoms. You wouldn't have mass therefore nothing to slow you down. Don't ask me how to remove it that isn't my job. My job was simply to cause chaos.
@judychurley6623
@judychurley6623 2 жыл бұрын
It's not the Higgs particle, but the field, which is ubiquitous like all fields, that is the issue.
@lightsab4675
@lightsab4675 2 жыл бұрын
Not the particle, the field which is just as impossible as going the speed of light
@crateer
@crateer 2 жыл бұрын
But.. we are travelling the speed of light.
@kloakovalimonada
@kloakovalimonada 2 жыл бұрын
I imagine quantum fields as kind of LCD screens. On those, lighting up tiny red, green and blue points can conjure any visible object. Quantum fields do that in 3D. Seems intuitive to me.
@Technicotop
@Technicotop 2 жыл бұрын
I would follow you on that way, there is just a little think that is hard to visualize : the space is not discrete, there is no "dot" like an LCD screen. As far as I know, space is continuous, and that's a pain to visualize !
@Infinite_0
@Infinite_0 2 жыл бұрын
i think they have made a 3D LED matrix, which all of the LED's can be individually controlled. I think that might do well explaining quantum feilds
@kloakovalimonada
@kloakovalimonada 2 жыл бұрын
@@Technicotop isn't that what quantum theory is ultimately about? That it is not in fact continuous, but divided into deterministic quantums?
@Technicotop
@Technicotop 2 жыл бұрын
@@kloakovalimonada I believe that quantum applies to energy levels, but not to spatial dimensions. Like having a 16 color tv with a magical pixelless screen
@kloakovalimonada
@kloakovalimonada 2 жыл бұрын
@@Technicotop you're probably right. What I was originally thinking is that the concept of quantum fields can be less abstract when you realize that you can get continuous image (or the illusion thereof, but it doesn't matter for our perception) with discrete units such as RGB pixels.
@muhamadarif1498
@muhamadarif1498 2 жыл бұрын
as my professor said before he started his semester class.."Physic is about WHY not WHAT"..keeping asking why,the physic will start explain it to you..i sub to ur channel for how easy to understand it and the topic really bring back memories from my Uni years..
@CounterRyu
@CounterRyu 2 жыл бұрын
If space has no gravity or resistance, can’t we keep applying thrust and it’ll continue to increase the speed up to the speed of light and beyond? The only problem is hitting space debre. I think I read once that there is very minimal resistance even in the vacuum of space, like the force that light from stars has upon objects floating in space. But even then, I feel like if a spaceship kept applying thrust, speed is boundless 😐
@markoshun
@markoshun 2 жыл бұрын
@@CounterRyu Check out the part about the Higgs field. All particles, except photons and gluons, are effected by, and interact with it, so there is resistance. The faster you go, the more the particle is effected until it reaches a point where infinite energy is required to accelerate further.
@Predated2
@Predated2 2 жыл бұрын
I mean, "why" implies intent, "how" seems the more accurate question to ask. An example: "Why did the apple fall off the tree?" Could be answered as "because it overslept" and it would be a logical answer to the question why. "How did the apple fall off the tree?" Can only be answered by an order of explanations. We can ask "why" those orders are the way the apple did fall off the tree, but there is no end to asking why, even though there could be an end to how something is done. Knowing when to ask "why" is when you get valid answers, otherwise, ask "how".
@_abdul
@_abdul 2 жыл бұрын
BW : Unfortunately, I'm going to change how you see the universe. Me : Jokes on you, I'm into that shit.
@calvinkeller
@calvinkeller 2 жыл бұрын
Haha I love this comment
@madisonbrown8851
@madisonbrown8851 2 жыл бұрын
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@orlandovazquez9662
@orlandovazquez9662 2 жыл бұрын
I love it, that's my plejaaahhh!!!
@yamatozhen
@yamatozhen 2 жыл бұрын
Whenever I keep asking why my teachers at some point can’t explain because they’re bad. This video is literally everything I asked for. That formula I don’t even need to remember in order to write because right now i know how waves and mass work
@shashankshastry8416
@shashankshastry8416 3 жыл бұрын
This has become my new favourite channel. Awesome visualizations. Looking forward for a complete series on quantum physics and relativity. Keep up the good work.
@Astrochronic
@Astrochronic 2 жыл бұрын
Lol. Raise your standards.
@FazedSoul
@FazedSoul 2 жыл бұрын
@@Astrochronic then why are you here? Just to act smart? Insecure enough?
@Astrochronic
@Astrochronic 2 жыл бұрын
@@FazedSoul Why are you triggered and virtue signaling? Insecure enough?
@claudiaarjangi4914
@claudiaarjangi4914 Жыл бұрын
​@@Astrochronic I don't know if you're trolling, having a bad day or just like/ need to prick holes in other people's balloons to get off on their disappointment.. You know the way you act & treat people physically and measurably affects the way the world, in turn, treats you.. Most intelligent people know this.. It's usually whiny, 'victims' of the world, who can't grow up/ man up / suck it up, who feel the need to be mean-spirited to pull everyone else down to their self caused depressing level ( cos doesn't matter what the world does to you, You choose whether you mend it or let it crumble) Maybe no one in your life who cares enough has made you face it, & since you don't know me I don't expect you to even read this, but I can tell you need something to make your life a little less depressed, so best wishes for making the rest of your life more than it is.. 🌏☮️♾️
@royfearn4345
@royfearn4345 2 жыл бұрын
Suddenly, this 79 y/old starts to understand the inter-relationship and inter-dependance of things (I think!)
@geriott609
@geriott609 2 жыл бұрын
Congrats Roy! Im 60 years younger and would love to say the same. The journey of understanding the world to a deeper degreee thanks to our technology and all the amazing scientists over the centuries. May Reason and Criticical thinking prevail
@spaceflight1019
@spaceflight1019 2 жыл бұрын
Don't forget, when you were younger it was canon that the speed of sound would never be exceeded.
@nameatrandom9234
@nameatrandom9234 2 жыл бұрын
I love this comment Roy👍✌️
@robbie8142
@robbie8142 2 жыл бұрын
How do you know what I'm thinking? 🤗🤗🤗
@socks2423
@socks2423 2 жыл бұрын
The weird part is, YOU can go as fast as you want. If you put in twice the energy, you can get to any speed as long as you measure from your frame of reference. If you want to get from point a to point b and the two points are a lightyear apart, there is no limit for how fast you can get there. This is due to the time dilation from moving this fast, if you want to go faster, you can. But from an outsiders perspective you are just getting closer to the speed of light and thus they see you slowing down in time.
@maciejzwolinski2381
@maciejzwolinski2381 2 жыл бұрын
~7:30 You are making huuuge mistake. "If you traveled at the speed of light particles in your body couldn't communicate, because they also abide the same speed limit". The problem in the R in SRT (special relativity theory). In the frame of reference of the object moving at the speed of light, all of it's internal processes remain consistent with it being at rest, thus from your own perspective you body would retain it's original shape and properties regardless of the speed you are traveling at (speed according to which reference frame?). In other words, as you approach the speed of light, you'd see the entire universe collapse along the axis of travel, but nothing noticeable would happen to you. You could go and make tea, look out the window, read a book and look out the window again, and except the universe looking quite differently to what we are used to on earth everything would seem completely normal. btw, ONLY if you stopped would you notice, that multiple lifetimes of the universe have passed while you were making tea :P
@joaquinbussio6733
@joaquinbussio6733 2 жыл бұрын
I thought the exact same thing, and that makes me wonder on the rest of the content, but it made sense to me considering the fact that the equations require m = 0 in order to go up to c, and the higgs field explains mass.
@maciejzwolinski2381
@maciejzwolinski2381 2 жыл бұрын
@@joaquinbussio6733 higgs field explains mass but only in case of elemental particles. Sure, we are made of these, but the higgs interaction is responsible for a tiny fraction of the mass of the human body. Rest of the mass comes from e=mc^2 and insane amount of energy bound in nuclear forces - in other words, if photons could interact with one another, and this interaction could store energy, then a pair of photons could have mass, while singular photons wouldn't.
@lokamigauti
@lokamigauti 2 жыл бұрын
It got me in the video also. Other question that came in mind was the how the Higgs field deals with the relativity, once the field position is not relative to the observer?
@sad.platypus
@sad.platypus 2 жыл бұрын
exactly! c is constant in every frame of reference, no matter your velocity
@jynxed66six54
@jynxed66six54 2 жыл бұрын
its not like flies in cars, what youre saying is that if you were moving at the speed of light, those sub atomic particles could exceed the speed of light in order to move in the direction youre going. this means you arent /0 anymore, youre /-1. you would need more than infinite energy to achieve this.
@semicharmedkindofguy3088
@semicharmedkindofguy3088 2 жыл бұрын
Your videos put such a different but intuitive spin to understanding concepts I've learned about many times in the past. Great work.
@bibleredpill
@bibleredpill 2 жыл бұрын
I love finding videos that explain these complicated physics and concepts in terms I can understand.
@Jaggerbush
@Jaggerbush Жыл бұрын
This hardly explained anything. He pretty much said you can’t bec you’ll blow up. Horrible.
@vvsPlatinum
@vvsPlatinum 2 жыл бұрын
Never seen it explained quite like this, thank you
@patinho5589
@patinho5589 2 жыл бұрын
I’m 43. When I was about 9 I read in a simple book the simple answer: that the faster things go the more massive they become.. so that you need more and more energy to accelerate the object…. eventually they get to infinite mass and you need infinite energy to accelerate it.
@joegagliardi3984
@joegagliardi3984 2 жыл бұрын
There is a certain reality to that.
@patinho5589
@patinho5589 2 жыл бұрын
@@joegagliardi3984 the book was for kids too! It had nice pictures of spaceships.
@Dragon-qt5zu
@Dragon-qt5zu 2 жыл бұрын
I'm 52 an the best books were from the book fair. I still have some in my collection. I bought a ton when the libraries started to close.
@Aguijon1982
@Aguijon1982 2 жыл бұрын
That is true but for particles with mass. Photons are massless
@theguywithone
@theguywithone 2 жыл бұрын
Speed doesn’t change the mass of an object. Friction as a result of speed at high enough levels can literally burn off part of that initial mass thus reducing mass.
@ryanatkinson2978
@ryanatkinson2978 2 жыл бұрын
I'm blown away by your content. You might be my new favorite channel
@user-ky5dy5hl4d
@user-ky5dy5hl4d 6 ай бұрын
Some of it is wrong.
@Bushheadmonster
@Bushheadmonster 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks to the algorithm I’ve been on a marathon of your videos, super informative and underrated !!
@peaguas629
@peaguas629 2 жыл бұрын
Your animations are so fun and intuitive, I love it
@pranavtripathi6336
@pranavtripathi6336 2 жыл бұрын
This was an amazing explanation. Most people know about the whole infinite energy thing etc but the way u explained about why infinite energy is required made it really good.
@minime9990
@minime9990 2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic explanation, illustration and production, will definitely be back for more
@docdoc
@docdoc 2 жыл бұрын
Finally someone who truly addresses the WHY properly! So appreciated!
@johnannan2506
@johnannan2506 2 жыл бұрын
Like some other people have written, I’ve watched LOTS of videos on physics subjects like this…. BUT, this is the FIRST one in a decade or more where it’s been taken beyond high school physics AND explained in a brilliant way that makes this understandable without making excuses about only REALLY being able to get the idea of you can think in mathematical equations. Love the graphics and the script is even better. Thank you. Please make more…. Like… what’s an electron volt, and what can you find out by smashing high velocity protons together?
@theclipreaper
@theclipreaper 3 жыл бұрын
This is the best explanation of this phenomenon I have ever seen on KZfaq, not even the great physics channels have explained it in this level of detail! You certainly got my subscription!
@Astrochronic
@Astrochronic 2 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@user-ky5dy5hl4d
@user-ky5dy5hl4d 6 ай бұрын
Some of it is wrong.
@theclipreaper
@theclipreaper 6 ай бұрын
@@user-ky5dy5hl4d Well good thing you stopped just short of being useful by not telling me what and why
@user-ky5dy5hl4d
@user-ky5dy5hl4d 6 ай бұрын
@@theclipreaper But Sir! I am the most useless individual in the whole World and I am glad you've noticed that. Everything is useless from my car to my dogs. Useless is asking why and what. Useless is going to work for it, too will be eaten by entropy. Useless is trying to live past your death. Useless is going to a doctor when you are sick because you will get sick again. Useless is eating because you will have to eat tomorrow. Usless is asking because you will not get it anyway. Useless is making a lot of money because the coffin has no pockets. Useless are the people around you because they don't give a hoot about you. Useless is the Universe because look how tiny you are compared to the vastness of it which seems like a lot of useless space. Uselessness is a very useful word to push you through useless life. Take care in this useless cosmos.
@leandromonteiro5098
@leandromonteiro5098 3 жыл бұрын
Man...you get right to the point in every vídeo. Amazing! You deserve much...much more subscribers!! Well done!
@imtrex521
@imtrex521 2 жыл бұрын
I watch science videos endlessly for years but I have learned new things here. Brovo!
@coreyhutchy6819
@coreyhutchy6819 2 жыл бұрын
Nothing can exceed the speed of light. That only applies to matter moving through space, but, according to general relativity, space itself has no boundaries to its upper limit and can do whatever it wants.
@eliashansen2168
@eliashansen2168 2 жыл бұрын
Yes that's why space it self is moving faster than the speed of light
@DonRoyalX
@DonRoyalX Жыл бұрын
@@eliashansen2168 moving, “Where”?
@eliashansen2168
@eliashansen2168 Жыл бұрын
@@DonRoyalX it's kinda expanding into itself. So it's not necessarily expanding into anything but it's expanding into itself
@DonRoyalX
@DonRoyalX Жыл бұрын
@@eliashansen2168 ha, u say that as if u know for certain. Truth is we have no idea and can only hypothesise fragile theories from fragmented evidence. Only thing I see expanding is my beer gut
@TrichordoKostas
@TrichordoKostas 2 жыл бұрын
best description of wave particle duality i've ever seen!
@jujufifi
@jujufifi 2 жыл бұрын
Oh my gosh I finally got it! Finally!!! Thanks! Keep up the good work!
@dahawk8574
@dahawk8574 4 жыл бұрын
Also... 7:15 - The speed of light is One Planck Length divided by One Planck Time. So if spacetime were thought of as being granular, the speed of light is simply taking One Quantized Step.
@ButWhySci
@ButWhySci 4 жыл бұрын
You're right. That's an interesting way of thinking about it.
@Perririri
@Perririri 2 жыл бұрын
Similar to using radians for trigonometry or e for logarithms
@user-ky5dy5hl4d
@user-ky5dy5hl4d 6 ай бұрын
@@ButWhySci There is no such thing as contraction of object traveling at the speed of light. If it were the photons would do that. If one must say that contraction exists then it is not and object that contracts but relative to the stationary observer he would see the object contract but on its own without the reference of relativity the object does not contract one bit. Also, the saying that the speed of light is just what it is just does not jibe with the principle of cause and effect. Therefore, what causes the speed of light? There must be a cause for the speed of c. And if this speed is achieved by a photon it must accelerate detaching itself from the source. Nothing happens in zero second. Physics can always be revised.
@user-ky5dy5hl4d
@user-ky5dy5hl4d 6 ай бұрын
We have the definition of length. Give me the definition of time. But not Planck's time.
@alirezanabavian771
@alirezanabavian771 3 жыл бұрын
I'm an electronics engineer i have seen awesome engineers and professors..but sir you are it...a true master ...I salute 👏 you
@hertselcorech9680
@hertselcorech9680 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your thorough and lucid explanation of complex matters, I always enjoy listening to your lectures. Only one comment if may, I think it would be more effective to do away with the music in the background. It's a bit too loud and somewhat distracting. Thank you for all the good that you do, best of luck to you.
@garyalexander5686
@garyalexander5686 2 жыл бұрын
Finally. I've been looking at videos which provide an explanation of why the speed of light can't be exceeded. This one made it clear to me. Thank you.
@stephenviggiano1610
@stephenviggiano1610 2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic content. Thank you and keep it coming.
@astrofish6163
@astrofish6163 2 жыл бұрын
I think you can jump from the moon to the earth, you just need to train so hard your hair falls out.
@spaceflight1019
@spaceflight1019 2 жыл бұрын
That's how Vector got back home.
@stupidmemes3251
@stupidmemes3251 2 жыл бұрын
Underrated
@prime7042
@prime7042 2 жыл бұрын
One punch man
@Haraamcore13
@Haraamcore13 8 ай бұрын
That was explained beautifully. Thanks. Subbed.
@anteeko
@anteeko 3 жыл бұрын
07:00 I think it is not correct, photon speed within an atom at near speed of light still travel at speed of light between an electron and proton
@Jack__________
@Jack__________ 2 жыл бұрын
But doesn’t time have to slow all the way down to allow for this? Its why a light clock would tick slower when it is moving faster relative to another light clock.
@gumbilicious1
@gumbilicious1 2 жыл бұрын
the explanation for this is generally that the light is 'absorbed and reemitted', and this is ok for a cursory explanation. but the reason light slows through mediums has to due with the calculation of the quantum field. the wave of the light interacts with the waves of the particles and this is observed as a 'slowing' of the light through a medium. this is worded incredibly poorly due to desire to keep this short, but the basic concept still holds
@alhypo
@alhypo 2 жыл бұрын
I like to think that we can travel at the speed of light. Or rather, we already are. We just aren't traveling through space very fast. But we are traveling through time very, very fast. Our perception of time arises from all the subatomic interactions occurring within our nervous systems. Every particle interaction in your body is a tiny little clock ticking away and driving the narrative of your timeline and conciseness. And those interactions occur very, very fast. Of course, we only experience the total sum of those interactions and are completely oblivious to them. So while we are moving slowly through space and very quickly through time, photons are moving only through space. They don't move through time at all. We find it fascinating that light can move so fast. But if light could be conscious, it would probably be fascinated by us and our strange ability to move through both time and space.
@foreskinfairy8975
@foreskinfairy8975 2 жыл бұрын
For all the times I've heard both the good old Newtonian laws and some variation of the "you need infinite energy to reach light speed" now I realize I've never actually asked the simple question "But why?". Great video.
@ShutterbugVis
@ShutterbugVis 3 жыл бұрын
2:58 it all fun and games till someone gets pissed off
@asifhamid5742
@asifhamid5742 3 жыл бұрын
Haa ha 😂😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣 I was looking for this comment
@potawatomi100
@potawatomi100 2 жыл бұрын
Outstanding video and narration.
@brostelio
@brostelio 2 жыл бұрын
I can't say enough how great your gift is. Wow.
@dahawk8574
@dahawk8574 4 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video. You deserve millions of subscribers. I'm glad to be one of your early ones. I'm looking forward to watching your channel explode ...like you were jumping to the Moon.
@StrongWoodenDesigns
@StrongWoodenDesigns 2 жыл бұрын
Well done sir. Well done. 👏👏👏👏
@MarcoPollo77
@MarcoPollo77 2 жыл бұрын
I learned something today. Thank you.
@CyanStudios24
@CyanStudios24 Жыл бұрын
That visual at 1:33 just changed my whole conception of reality wow
@mjmulenga3
@mjmulenga3 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for a great video. Just one note: dividing by zero is NOT infinity, it's undefined and impossible. If 1/0 = ∞, then ∞ x 0 = 1 causing all sorts of nonsensical results and basically breaking maths. So 1/0 is undefined.
@sachinpatel9372
@sachinpatel9372 2 жыл бұрын
💯
@lescobrandon8443
@lescobrandon8443 2 жыл бұрын
Good point. Of course, that leads me more to believe the math is wrong. You can't go "undefined" number and just accept it as truth. Unfortunately, with our current level of mathematic understanding, this is the closest we have.
@mjmulenga3
@mjmulenga3 2 жыл бұрын
@@lescobrandon8443 yes you absolutely can. That's exactly how maths works: you define the axioms and rules, and throw out anything that doesn't fit the rules. In maths you don't accept something as true, you define something as true. In the rules we have accepted, it's impossible to divide by zero. If you define other rules and they're logically consistent, you can divide by zero in that system... because you've defined it as such.
@lescobrandon8443
@lescobrandon8443 2 жыл бұрын
@@mjmulenga3 You obviously don't understand what I am saying. If something is "undefined", it isn't an answer. It's just shrugging and saying oh well. That said, because of our current level of understanding in mathematics, the closest we have is this. It doesn't necessarily mean that it is wrong, but that it is beyond our grasp currently, and thus left "undefined". Maybe, if people question the theory, like they should be doing, we might come up with something even closer to the truth. I don't see it happening soon, especially with so many people refusing to challenge their own little world view like it is right now, but maybe in a few generations. Remember, the scientific method is always an on going process. It is designed to be challenged. That is why they are "theories", not laws.
@user-uk6em4mv9l
@user-uk6em4mv9l 2 жыл бұрын
​@@lescobrandon8443 To divide you need some quantifiable value, division by zero just doesn't make any sense. Although there is infinitely small numbers which is like zero, but not exactly and you can throw them in any equation you like.
@user-uu7sk8bz5l
@user-uu7sk8bz5l 2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful explanation
@robbabcock_
@robbabcock_ 2 жыл бұрын
A great simple explanation!
@glidershower
@glidershower Жыл бұрын
As an amateur dabbling in physics, I've thought that lightspeed means the limit of _everything,_ given its wavelenght is the Planck lenght, or the smallest unit of timespace there can be. In order to be anything, that anything would have to give up being everything in that moment, and enter the arrow of time (aka follow causality). While it might not be the smallest unit/distance _possible,_ for all frames of reference in our current reality _it is._ A photon is not traveling anywhere, _it is everywhere that is crossing the path of the photon._ For its frame of reference, not a single second has passed from the Milky Way to Andromeda, but from ours it's been a mind-boggling 5 million years for a round travel. Anything (conceptually) faster would simply fail to be registered by our instruments as they fall outside our realm of causality, which is what I believe the realm of dark energy, an energy that is invisible to us by all means except on its effects of expanding timespace faster than its own speed. So chances are good the photon is not the limit per se, but it is for anything that can be observed. Hyperlight travel would forcibly need to bend timespace itself as it would be impossible to reach the finish line without ever moving from the start line. Tl;Dr: God needs to upgrade the ram on his Micro Center built computer he made while drunk.
@fancymcclean6210
@fancymcclean6210 2 жыл бұрын
On the basis of this vid I've subscribed. Good work. Flaxen Saxon.
@whydidyouresign
@whydidyouresign 2 жыл бұрын
Nice presentation! new sub.
@nicklaskowalski
@nicklaskowalski 2 жыл бұрын
You, Sir, are, officially, my, new, favourite, YT, channel!! Yes, I’m in a bit of a coma...
@alengunnery8311
@alengunnery8311 2 жыл бұрын
This channel is gonna explode.... I'm happy I found this
@siddharthkshatri668
@siddharthkshatri668 4 жыл бұрын
Nice videos buddy... Keep going👌👍
@LordRaven256
@LordRaven256 4 жыл бұрын
While watching your videos (which I really like btw) I was wondering which software you use to create your 3D animations. Since the screenshot you used in this video is from Blender 2.8 I suspect you use Blender. So my question: Do you actually use Blender or did you just plug in that screenshot randomly? (I use Blender myself so I was quite intrigued about your animations and was constantly thinking: How would I achieve this effect?).
@ButWhySci
@ButWhySci 4 жыл бұрын
Yup it's all blender! I've got a secondary channel where I'll periodically upload tutorials or explanations of some things. Any effect in particlar thats stumping you?
@LordRaven256
@LordRaven256 4 жыл бұрын
@@ButWhySci You got a 2nd channel with tutorials? Awesome! I'm gonna check it out. No there wasn't a particular effect. It's more when you understand more about something (in this case 3D rendering), I tend to see more than just the end result. I think stuff like: How would I achieve this effect or which shaders would I use to create this material. This even happens in the real world: I see something and I think: How much Roughness & Specular that material in Blender would have. So not only are your videos educational - I also get ideas for my own 3D scenes.
@sentientgoogleaccount8265
@sentientgoogleaccount8265 2 жыл бұрын
2:55 I laughed for 5 minutes straight when the red guy punched the blue dude... and it cut off before he made contact which multiplied the hilarity
@ANDROLOMA
@ANDROLOMA 2 жыл бұрын
"The Imagination Trap" by Colin Kapp. Excellent story illustrating infinite mass + infinite velocity.
@savannahparrish7261
@savannahparrish7261 3 жыл бұрын
Your content is excellent!
@RonBertrand
@RonBertrand 2 жыл бұрын
Light speed "c" and why it is that speed, was determined by Maxwell c=1/SQR(Mu x Eo) where Mu is the permeability of free space and Eo is the permittivity of free space both of which are easy to measure.
@danarrington2224
@danarrington2224 2 жыл бұрын
How can you measure free space when no human has ever been in free space. We are constantly affected by gravity among other things.
@gumbilicious1
@gumbilicious1 2 жыл бұрын
I would argue that while Maxwell certainly was aware of this fact, he didn't know how it applied. It was a speed, but in relation to what? the Earth, the Sun? At the time time a concept of a Luminiferous Aether was considered, the reference frame of light (an older concept that kept accumulating the baggage of newer observations). At the time it was not unreasonable to think you could obtain this speed, you just couldn't due to lack of means only. Work by Loorentz and Poincare resulting from experimentation by Michaelson/Morley is generally credited for bringing meaning to what the speed of c meant, at least before Einstein's 1905 paper On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies submited a more cohesive explanation free of the Luminiferous Aether. So c was old hat, the framework that better explained and predicted what c meant came a bit later.
@RonBertrand
@RonBertrand 2 жыл бұрын
@@gumbilicious1 All good. I was making the point that we know why light (and all other EM waves) have the velocity they have i.e. approx 300,000 kms/s and not some other velocity. Maxwell could not measure the permeability and permittivity in freespace but the difference between those measurements in earths atmosphere and freespace are insignificant. So Maxwell knew he had hit on something really big when he did his calculations for light velocity of the waves in my earlier comment. Thank you for your comments. Best wishes
@RonBertrand
@RonBertrand 2 жыл бұрын
@@danarrington2224 Hi Dan the difference between the permeability and permittivity in free space and earth's atmosphere is insignificant.
@xmon82
@xmon82 2 жыл бұрын
Great videos! Love the channel. Do you use Blender for all your animations?
@asmaar566
@asmaar566 2 жыл бұрын
holy how are you so good at explaining
@cartoonsong193
@cartoonsong193 2 жыл бұрын
you just gained a sub good work though I knew it beforehand i liked how you beak it into simple pieces that a common man can fit together
@antonydandrea
@antonydandrea 2 жыл бұрын
This is the first time I have seen the concept of wave/particle duality and the quantum fields explained and illustrated to a point that I get it. It's amazing to think we are all just made up of these. Vibrations in a field
@joegagliardi3984
@joegagliardi3984 2 жыл бұрын
Impressive visuals!
@doktormcnasty
@doktormcnasty 2 жыл бұрын
In the future we'll probably be able to buy infinite energy at the local 7/11.
@Jaggerbush
@Jaggerbush 2 жыл бұрын
Great channel. Im on board.
@RagingGeekazoid
@RagingGeekazoid 2 жыл бұрын
The deBroglie equation describes the problem mathematically but doesn't explain it physically. The simplest explanation is that (a) the vacuum is responsible for both macroscopic motion and the quantum time-evolution of matter, and (b) the vacuum's capacity or activity level is a constant. So time slows down inside moving objects because their motion uses up some of the vacuum's processing power. At the speed of light, the vacuum is maxxed out by the object's motion, so the object doesn't evolve internally at all, i.e. time slows down all the way to a complete halt. And it's impossible for matter to go faster than the speed of light, for the same reason that it's impossible for sound waves to go faster than the speed of sound: the speed limit is based on the medium's capacity to support the wave phenomenon.
@flyingllama87
@flyingllama87 3 жыл бұрын
Great video. I learned a lot. The concept of a particle/wave's wavelength approaching 0 is great and very intuitive. That said, there is a lot of requisite knowledge needed to follow along with this video. Perhaps a video(s) going over the knowledge dependencies would be good?
@redwhiteblustripe5490
@redwhiteblustripe5490 2 жыл бұрын
My inquiring mind thanks you!
@ceph5794
@ceph5794 2 жыл бұрын
You sir, have just earned a subscriber
@marksIItimewarps
@marksIItimewarps 2 жыл бұрын
Speed of light travel and beyond is possible via "Lense-Thirring" Effect or "Frame dragging". (look this up). If an object gets close to the speed of light, it gets really massive, that gained mass (through gen relativity) and speed will drag space-time around it. The object may appear or even traverse space at the speed of light but because it's "dragging" the local space, it's relative speed against its local space would still be below the speed of light (and the energy demand is still *not* infinite). Eventually, it would even permit faster than light travel. It's likely the same mechanism how some galaxies might be flying through space very close or even beyond the speed of light.
@superlambmilkshake4904
@superlambmilkshake4904 2 жыл бұрын
Thats relavistic mass it gains when travelling at the speed of light and it is only used as a tool for the mathematics to be easier, it is not real. The video literally explains as an object goes faster the frequency of the quantum matter - wave increases, and energy is the frequency of those waves, as it reaches the speed of light, special relativity says that space should contract so much that the space between the waves would be impossibly small
@jknyphausen
@jknyphausen 2 жыл бұрын
Yes I will definitely retain all this information
@ministerofjoy
@ministerofjoy 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Kenshin6321
@Kenshin6321 2 жыл бұрын
The sad part is, even if the speed of light was attainable, the universe is so big we still wouldn't be able to see even 1% of it.
@DiegoOrtiz-nf9fk
@DiegoOrtiz-nf9fk 2 жыл бұрын
Universe is actually expanding faster than lightspeed, space is not bound to "our" physics laws, there is a possibility of traveling way faster than light, some scientist are working on that, it is complicated and we don't have the technology yet, but basically is bend the space, shrink it in front of you and expand it behind, technically you are not moving, is the space who does it.
@cobrachannel100
@cobrachannel100 2 жыл бұрын
@@DiegoOrtiz-nf9fk for that, I think the energy requirements are that of the entire universe :D I guess they need to come up with some antimatter related energy generation or something like that.
@VaibhavKrGupta-xo8fu
@VaibhavKrGupta-xo8fu 4 жыл бұрын
Someday I will mention you in my speech in Switzerland
@starship4282
@starship4282 3 жыл бұрын
You mean Sweden?
@73THUNDERDOME73
@73THUNDERDOME73 2 жыл бұрын
You mean Nigeria?
@ahmedmukhtar9121
@ahmedmukhtar9121 2 жыл бұрын
@@73THUNDERDOME73 why Nigeria?
@muazzamhaynes1780
@muazzamhaynes1780 2 жыл бұрын
You mean Poland?
@setspeed
@setspeed 2 жыл бұрын
you live in India
@tony.h321
@tony.h321 2 жыл бұрын
Good video and explanation 👍👍 With all this talk of quantum communication via entanglement going around, though, I've been wondering. Could "quantum speed" be "faster than light"? The information online is very mixed when it comes to this, and I'm trying to find out if there's truth to it, if its being considered at least in theory, or if the public/media is once again just misinterpreting scientific matters?
@steve_ancell
@steve_ancell 2 жыл бұрын
The speed of light is attainable, light has been doing it for billions of years.
@steve_ancell
@steve_ancell 2 жыл бұрын
@@syaralemyar1077 I know, I was just taking the piss.
@fractai.
@fractai. 2 жыл бұрын
This channel is so underrated
@monaxp606
@monaxp606 2 жыл бұрын
One day we'll acheive not only light speed but beyond that limit.
@billyclacky8836
@billyclacky8836 2 жыл бұрын
Definitely Not me watching a mind boggling and fascinating video yet laughing and totally getting distracted by the Orange figure getting ready to knock out his “playfully” pushing friend at 3:00 😂😅
@shootdaj
@shootdaj Жыл бұрын
I agree with everything except the last part. Light always travels the same speed regardless of what speed you're traveling, because of time dilation. When you get to light speed, time freezes. So essentially nothing will happen anymore.
@davidabdollahi7906
@davidabdollahi7906 2 жыл бұрын
From what you say and visualized about matter moving through higgs field this comes to mind that there is some sort of friction with higgs field that resists change in momentum. But what if we increase speed gradually? Also when you say you can't jump to the moon since the force of such a jump will rip you apart, again what if we apply this force slowly to reduce the resistance of inertia as much as possible?
@verycoldhardybles790
@verycoldhardybles790 2 жыл бұрын
Or , another scenario. Two objects travelling in oposite directions at 1/2 of speed of light. It doesn't require infinite energy to achive that.
@manuell3505
@manuell3505 2 жыл бұрын
Opposite outer visible area's of the universe seem to move away from eachother with much more speed than light...
@verycoldhardybles790
@verycoldhardybles790 2 жыл бұрын
@@manuell3505 no, they don't. Red shift can be explained by the age of the objects
@manuell3505
@manuell3505 2 жыл бұрын
@@verycoldhardybles790 Spacetime expands. Redshift / Doppler Effect indicates that a star or galaxy is moving away from us.
@tiggy7777
@tiggy7777 2 жыл бұрын
It doesnt require infinte energy in this scenario because no physical object is actually traveling at the speed of light. the objects are still travelling at 1/2 the speed of light. instead the distance between the 2 objects is changing at the speed of light.
@verycoldhardybles790
@verycoldhardybles790 2 жыл бұрын
@@tiggy7777 the same tging - they trsvrl away from each other or relative to each other at a speed of light :D
@Lunaticusius
@Lunaticusius 2 жыл бұрын
I began with some of the black hole videos and now I'm here. For reference, I had Astrophysics, Quantum (Field) Theory lectures and a part of my work is related to Particle Physics, however I went more into Materials Physics. Your display of stuff seems unmatched to me. Not a single textbook or lecture delivers the knowledge of these topics that easy. I had the hard way going by foot like so many others. I'm really enjoying your explanations/lectures :) ... sometimes I asked this particular question. "But why?". To my professors. After I saw I started to embarras them I stopped that. Now I'm on the other side of the table and I'm really happy if one or another of the students is asking questions about how stuff works and we can discuss more deeply. But sadly, it seems to be increasingly rare as the time goes forward ...
@BluesyBor
@BluesyBor 2 жыл бұрын
The answer to why the speed of light is around 300000km/s and not anything else is also simple in itself - light speed is defined by electric and magnetic permeability of the considered environment, and in pure vacuum those constants make us almost 300000km/s. They're different in various gases and liquids, which reduce the speed of light in those places and that's what causes light refraction in them. Those quantities simply define how quickly the electric field can transfer vibrations in itself. Now the question is why those two quantities have such values. :P
@fctoashton
@fctoashton 2 жыл бұрын
This video should have a huge caveat that says: *based on our current mathematical observations*
@judychurley6623
@judychurley6623 2 жыл бұрын
True of all science, which is why it is science and not faith or feeling.
@arsenic1987
@arsenic1987 2 жыл бұрын
One question I had when watching this. Can you call the fields "static"? And thus infer an absolute velocity from things? I know your graphics are trying to visualize the impossibly small, but from one Planck distance to another, could they be described as "static in the universe"? Or is this just my 3D mind not getting what the field is. Thank you =)
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 2 жыл бұрын
it's your 3d mind thinking of the fields like an aether. All known fields transform (read: move) as some representation of the Lorentz group, meaning: they have no absolute rest frame.
@arsenic1987
@arsenic1987 2 жыл бұрын
@@DrDeuteron That "kinda" makes sense. It's just hard to wrap my head around the fields when we have established a "absolute minimum" distance. I am a programmer, so you're very right in my mind doesn't yet allow me to think outside 3D, even tough I try =) Thank you for the answer. But I still cannot fully comprehend it. (Isn't that one of the things about the quantum world. Hehe. If you claim to understand it, you don't understand it).
@marz8386
@marz8386 2 жыл бұрын
“It’s an interesting thing to think about, but also impossible and unnecessary.”
@superdoofy
@superdoofy 2 жыл бұрын
Same thing I said to my parents when they asked when I'm giving them grandkids lol
@Jurassic_Sazria
@Jurassic_Sazria 3 жыл бұрын
Wow,awesome
@tamish3551
@tamish3551 2 жыл бұрын
When you said that at infinity a wave length is 0 that reminds me of the man who took a school hostage and passed out his book “infinity=0”. I doubt his book would entail anything relevant to this but it is weird to think about.
@martingeerars9640
@martingeerars9640 2 жыл бұрын
Light isn't just moving, it's expanding, that's why it behaves both like a particle and a wave
@matthewwells4171
@matthewwells4171 2 жыл бұрын
At this current time and date it's not possible but in a couple of hundred years let's revisit this.
@jaybabe7767
@jaybabe7767 2 жыл бұрын
You should do a video about riding a gravity wave as a theoretical way to travel faster or as fast as light in space like with some sort of gravity field bending space its self.
@sarahturgeon462
@sarahturgeon462 2 жыл бұрын
Exactly like UFOs
@paulfoss5385
@paulfoss5385 2 жыл бұрын
"Why is the speed of light 300000 km/s?" I think isn't the best phrasing given the speed of light being a fundamental whatchamacallit. Perhaps a better wording would be "Why do we experience a second when light moves 300000 kilometers?" And then the answer would be down to how many interactions can happen between our particles mediated by an electromagnetic field that sends information at that speed. Or I could be wrong. I don't know.
@dovos8572
@dovos8572 2 жыл бұрын
the reason why we experience the time like we do is most likely because of the speed our brain can computate informations without killing itself in a few months or years. and we do have an evolutional reason to it too. it is a good speed in there the things in our world change. it wouldn't make sense to have a fast brain but our body can't move fast enough to keep up. the next thing about that is that it takes more energy to think and move faster. that is the reason why small animals are thinking and moving faster than big animals. they are small enough to only need a bit of energy to "think" faster and so experiance the time faster. we as humans are technological so far that we already have cameras that can shoot so fast that it stretches a second to an hour or more with a relative good resolution. that is so fast that we can follow the breaking line of glas or let a bullet freez in space while the frames are running.
@abebuckingham8198
@abebuckingham8198 2 жыл бұрын
The answer is even more mundane. It's because the meter is defined by the distance light travels in a vacuum for exactly the amount of time necessary to make it this way. The meter was defined earlier by an arbitrary measurement but now we use the speed light to define what that distance is since it's invariant and observable but it was kept around the same size so we didn't have to redo the metric system.
@cobrachannel100
@cobrachannel100 2 жыл бұрын
I think I heard somewhere where they explained how c was calculated and the conclusion was - the one that was the easiest to understand for mere mortals - it is the max in the universe. Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and that is because it is the limit for our universe.
@dovos8572
@dovos8572 2 жыл бұрын
@@cobrachannel100 well that it is the "limit" is easy to understand. but WHY is it the limit? and why there?
@cobrachannel100
@cobrachannel100 2 жыл бұрын
@@dovos8572 I dont think we can answer that question. It is the constraint of this particular universe. There is much we dont understand about the universe, how big it is, why it is expanding, why big bang happened, and so on. I dont think we will ever be able to explain and answer those questions. Thus why we just need to take the c being limited at 300 thousand km/s and stop questioning it :)
@Galaktican1
@Galaktican1 2 жыл бұрын
When considering the vastness of space the speed of light is really, really slow.
@phitc4242
@phitc4242 2 жыл бұрын
fun fact: the speed of light defines the meter, NOT the other way round! edit: That is why the speed of light is exactly 299'792'458m/s and thus has no fraction whatsoever. And one more thing: Out of the seven base units (SI base units), time (seconds) is also one of those. The more accurate we can define (measure) a second, the more accurate a meter becomes (see above). Luckily for us, atomic clocks achieve just that!
@LastManYea
@LastManYea 2 жыл бұрын
Brain got denser, thank you
@phitc4242
@phitc4242 2 жыл бұрын
@@LastManYea you're welcome
@alexanderturok2306
@alexanderturok2306 2 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know where the music comes from?
@charleschastain829
@charleschastain829 2 жыл бұрын
This type of teaching is like watching toddlers feel around crawling in the dark opening your mind open your mind
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 3 жыл бұрын
You could have gotten into Louis de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony: "Universal coherence" - a "mind boggling outlook." Phase harmony in de Broglie theory relates a local periodic phenomenon (the 'particle clock') to a periodic propagating field in such a way that relativistic invariance is satisfied. If a similar phenomenon in the cell is relevant it should couple the global oscillation pattern locally with periodic (mechanic, electric, biochemical ???) processes. Coherence as consciousness. "Ghost Tones" Manfred Euler is a Professor Emeritus of Physics at the University of Kiel.
@milesjsandifer
@milesjsandifer 2 жыл бұрын
Refraction is not about light traveling slower, it’s information propagating at different speeds as the phase velocity becomes different from the group velocity. Light always travels at full speed by definition.
@ted1990
@ted1990 2 жыл бұрын
The quoted speed of light is for in a vacuum however
@milesjsandifer
@milesjsandifer 2 жыл бұрын
@@ted1990 correct, and it still goes the speed of light through other materials. The information it carries goes slower. Group v phase velocity
A Detailed Breakdown of Core Collapse Supernovae
14:28
But Why?
Рет қаралды 498 М.
How I prepare to meet the brothers Mbappé.. 🙈 @KylianMbappe
00:17
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
Joven bailarín noquea a ladrón de un golpe #nmas #shorts
00:17
100❤️ #shorts #construction #mizumayuuki
00:18
MY💝No War🤝
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
OMG 😨 Era o tênis dela 🤬
00:19
Polar em português
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
The Incomprehensible Scale of 52!
7:44
But Why?
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Fixing the Flaw in Photosynthesis
8:32
But Why?
Рет қаралды 206 М.
What Do You Mean Mass is Energy?
11:38
But Why?
Рет қаралды 330 М.
Can Anything Travel Faster Than Light?
9:08
StarTalk
Рет қаралды 403 М.
Why Do We Have Two Brains?
7:06
But Why?
Рет қаралды 146 М.
What is Gravity? The Illusion of Force by a Curved Dimension
8:41
But Why?
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
When Do Black Holes Form?
12:56
But Why?
Рет қаралды 398 М.
Energy Free Cooling through Physics
11:36
But Why?
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Your Brain on Marijuana
10:08
But Why?
Рет қаралды 22 М.
How I prepare to meet the brothers Mbappé.. 🙈 @KylianMbappe
00:17
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН