Just because science "doesn't know" at the present point in time doesn't mean they won't figure it out in the future. It's not proof of an intelligent creator. It just illustrates our limited understanding. The fundamental problem here is using Genesis as the source text. Genesis is an allegory not to be taken literally. It's hard to understand why well educated intelligent people do this. The Vedas from India have much more sophisticated descriptions of creation stretching back millions and billions of years. And of course the limitations of the dating methods are well understood. That doesn't invalidate them. He just comes up with a bunch of hypotheses to try to invalidate the results to conform to his worldview.

​​@@charlo90952 Further study required....but I will say that IF God exists then He is the author of the laws of science and therefore presumably can manipulate them at will. There is much we don't know as recent observations from Webb telescope is demonstrating. Astrophysicists are telling us most of the universe is composed of "dark energy/dark matter" which no one really understands. We still are unraveling the staggering complexity of the cell and yet most textbooks assume the first one originated from a primordial mud puddle through random natural processes. I'm not ready to discard a supernatural explanation for some of these fundamental mysteries. After all, if there is no natural explanation, then the only alternative is a supernatural one. If that makes me delusional then so be it. I'm in good company with the likes of Newton, Pascal, Maxwell, Townes, Gauss, and many others. Of course, one who is solely committed to a naturalistic philosophy can always resort to "in time we will figure it out." So there's really no point in even having a discussion. Even if it's raising a dead person back to life, you can fall back to the "enough time" argument - which is the whole point of cryogenics which basically assumes we're just computers made of meat. As Shakespeare said in Hamlet, "there may be more in heaven and earth than is dreamt of in your philosophy Horatio." :))

@@rodneyspence7441 There's no need to conflate science with religious philosophy. They are completely unrelated. Religion teaches you how to live your life. Science seeks to determine how things work. We don't even need to know this. All we need to know is that the sun comes up every day. The actual mechanics of the universe are of no consequence. The biblical descriptions of creation are perfectly satisfactory. Just as American Indian myths of turtle diving to bring up dirt to build the land are perfectly satisfactory. It's this insistence that the biblical descriptions are the only correct ones that's the problem. The Vedic texts have much more detailed descriptions of creation, although they are pretty fanciful. But at least they are comfortable speaking of millions and billions of years.

@@charlo90952 Well I`m not entirely certain on the age of the earth - that's why I watched the video.. They thought the universe was about 14 billion years old for decades and now the theory is being revised to 33 billiion based on Webb telescope observations. I disagree - I believe science is the search for truth - and with that as a definition science and religion are inextricably linked. Like I said IF God exists then He is the creator of the universe which means He is the author of the laws of science. Humans didn't invent the laws of physics and chemistry - we merely uncovered them - they were there all along. And there may be many more we don't know about. God could also make the universe appear to us as being billions of years old by controlling time and light. A chemist at the wedding of Cana would have concluded the wine was at least several decades old when it was actually only a few hours old at most. I disagree religion is only about how to live your life. But your religion will guide you how to live your life. For example, a Bible believer the 10 commandments are the "laws" of life. But if I'm an atheist there is no good reason why I shouldn't just do whatever I want - including rape, rob, and murder - if I can get away with it. Why? Because from an atheistic worldview there is no absolute moral standard - morals are based on subjective opinion. And since humans are mere byproducts of evolution they have no more inherent worth than animals. We're just a conglomeration of molecules destined for nothingness. It doesn't matter in the end whether you live like Hitler or Mother Teresa. There is no final accountability. Of course you may find yourself in prison under human laws, but again humans are just random byproducts of evolution. It's not like an absolute moral standard worked its way into the evolutionary tree. That's why a large majority of the population is OK with the extermination of over a thousand unborn children in this country every day. Spare kids, spare cats. They're not "real peoples". But that's another issue. I don't believe in multiple truths. I believe there is THE truth. Truth is by its nature exclusionary - just as 1 + 1 = 2 and not any other number. Sorry if that offends people but that's the way it is I believe. You may as well be offended by mathematics- which some actually are! But people are free to believe whatever they want. Unfortunately, the truth may not be revealed until our expiration date, but that's where faith comes in. If we all knew the truth with absolute certainty then faith would be meaningless. I don't think there's any point in going back and forth on this any further. I have a lot of work to do as I'm sure you do. Suffice to say time will tell. Or perhaps there could be an inward supernatural revelation. Anyways, I would hope we are more than just meat computers struggling through life during our little time "at bat" and destined to the dust as the ages roll on. So long fellow human:))

​@@charlo90952 Well that's the whole point of the discussion. That the standard scientific assumptions when it comes to doing research on the age of the Eaeth could never be confirmed because we can't go back in time and confirm if those assumptions were true. It isn't just about religious philosophy. It is about thinking critically and understanding that the age if the Earth is more of a forensics matter rather than pure scientific conjecture. Btw, Einstein himself said that scientists don't make great philosophers. So how is it that people ask those who aren't scientists to let actual scientists do all the scientific research; yet not tell the scientists to let the philosophers and theologians do all the philosophical study? That's like telling a mathematician to mathematically recreate a Van Gogh painting. That's just not realistic or reasonable.

God's word declares that the earth is millions upon millions of years old. II Peter 3:5-7, is just one scripture. How could God have chosen His elect BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD? How could God hate Esau before he was even born? How could God say that Jeremiah was a prophet before he was born. When did Satan rebel and become prideful? IN THE FIRST EARTH AND HEAVEN AGE- Ezekiel chapter 28.

​@@billb3673This doesn't mean that the earth is millions of years old. All it means is that God knew everything before it ever happened which makes sense because he is God.

Thank you for your wonderful testimony brother 🙏🏼 May God, our Lord Jesus, bless you.

Thomas Have you taken the steps to be forgiven? See Jesus died on the cross for our sins and it's a free gift all we have to do is ask for forgiveness and turn form our sinful life. If you have great If not I would be happy to walk you through it. Jesus is my savior and Lord! What Quaker church did you go to, I grew up in a Quaker church in Ohio ? Where are you attending today?

@@JonathanMurrayhistory, philosophy and even science proof Christianity to be true. It takes more logical leaps to believe in evolution, naturalism /purely naturalistic reality, than to seek out the evidence we base our belief (conviction of the truth aka evidence) on. We don’t have blind faith, we test claims made… Funny thing is the guy who came up with the scientific method was an christian and used the method to proof that science can only work in a world with set parameters/rules/laws. Laws are written/given/created by something else than the laws themselves… Who wrote the laws of nature? Cannot be a something cause a thing doesn’t have a will to do anything. Only someone , a person has. And that person is beyond the laws of nature cause it is the writer of them… Time/space how they are connected yet different are a working construction as well and again they are part of creation too (yet intangible). So the writer ain’t governed by those laws either… Who is this writer? 🤧🤔 Bless you brother in humanity

​@@JonathanMurray What mental illness are you talking about? Please do explain.

​@@JonathanMurrayDid you miss reading the community guidelines? You must have bc they said to keep all comments respectful and your comment was shameful ...

1 Timothy says that Bodily Exersices profits us little, but godliness profiteth us much.. Thats why being led by the spirit is more benificial than being lead by man.. God bless us all..

😂😂😂😂 What confounds the wise is you claim a god exists that used magic to create our homeworld. Magic isnt real and planets are created thru natural causes. 🤪

Right, the wise are so confused! They somehow just don't buy all the miracles and magical fairytale claims in our imaginary sky wizard book. Imagine that? 🙄

God bless you and capitalize the G in God, I’ll be praying for you ❤️

@@coffeetalk924 The fool in his shallow little abscessed heart...

Wow, so one experiment done by one person destroyed all we learned about science. You sure are gullible.

So.. you are ignorant about how any of this works, and so was that "scientific guy". You cant use radiometric dating on living organisms. It literally works by comparing the radio of different carbon isotopes, one of which decays, the others dont. While alife you take them in constantly and these ratios stay more or less constant. All dating methods have a range of age they are viable for. You wouldnt try using tree rings to date a 1 month old tree either, right?

@@Yamyatos what is the half life, of carbon....

@@philipbuckley759 Ill expect this to be a catch question since you could have just google it, but it's 5730 years plus or minus a couple decades of accuracy. If we are talking about carbon 14 that is. If you are talking about, say, carbon 11, which we can produce in labs, its half life is just 20 minutes.

You're a liar!. Nobody who knows anything about science would do carbon dating on something still alive. You should stop lying now.

Really? If someone comes up to you and says "The sky is green" and 2 minutes later says "The sky is red", then you would stop believing them, right? So why aren't you doing the same to this YEC BS? They are taking their only evidence from Genesis, a book that is loaded to the brim with inaccuracies and contradictions!

What are some of the contradictions?

Totally false teaching. God's word declares that the earth is millions upon millions of years old in many places. II Peter 3:5-7 is just one. We are told in Genesis 1:28 that God told his creation of man to REPLENISH the earth. There are THREE earth and heaven ages.

I think you should either reconsider science or you don’t know what science actually is if this rings true with you.

It is called moronic pseudo-science.

Perhaps you should reconsider 😁

This isn’t science. At all. It’s simply him coming from a presupposed world view and trying to make what he sees fit with it. That’s the opposite of science.

​@@justinstewart3248which explains how we have the entire world clinging to radiometric dating shouting from the mountain tops that it's real and true and solid and yet it's validity false far short of the gold standard of the scientific method.

Brother I agree about 6,000 years ago give or take a few hundred years. It does not say anywhere in the Bible that the earth is 6,000 years old standing on that and putting words in your Lords mouth is not a good thing to to! if you were to change your statement to Estimated 6,000 years you would be better off yet never say Jesus said it is 6,000 years old because He never said that and leads to your testimony being pulled apart! Love you Brother Blessing to you!

@@norbertjendruschj9121 So that is what you want to believe with all the evidence I wish you well. Why do you choose to be a heckler on this site if you do not question your beliefs?

@@norbertjendruschj9121 Where have you been it's the Christians that show up at earth quakes, Wars, natural disasters it's Christian organization that help people build wells for fresh clean water when they don't have any. name me one ethicistic organization that helps people in time of need. Just one my friend? As for liars well you haven't proved Christians to be liars so that is mute. If you have substance tell us all. By the way congratulations on your education. That should make you want to prove or disprove what has been shown and stated. Anyone can hackle others that does not prove anything.

@@norbertjendruschj9121 praying for you

@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice What evidence? There is mountains of evidence for a 4.5 billion year old Earth.

God's word says that the earth is millions upon millions of years old. II Peter 3:5-7 is just one place in God's Word declaring it.

Which god? SO many to choose from. If there was a god you think that being would make it idiot proof as to which is the real one.

Job 38-40

@@mash9809 if xmyou will make such claims, be prepared to defend them.

Ironic that the evolutionary narrative falls outside the scientific method isn't it?

@@TheSaintFrenzy we have direct observations for evolution. To name a few: Salt and Pepper Moths, Chernobyl tree frogs, SuperBugs (antibiotic resistant bacteria) and many more if you use the handy device, that literally contains all human knowladge.

Truth I’m not entirely sure what to believe, there honestly evidence for both sides. And it’s entirely possible God created everything in its present state or at least similar. God created Adam and Eve fully grown adult who’s to say he didn’t create the universe with the appearance of age. Part of me also believes this is an irrelevant distraction to what really matters and that’s the fullness of God’s word, the wisdom he offers, and the Gospel. What really truly matters is believing and putting you faith in Jesus, surrendering, following. What’s important enough is know the fundamentals about creation. God made every thing according to their kind, no matter how old the universe is, it still stand that Hod made everything, can’t have something from nothing, and the complexity of creation no doubt is proof of God. The code of life: DNA is the best proof of intelligent design. Computers don’t code themselves, we humans do.

@@TheMillstone0 Yes, but a short creation timeframe requires that God created the evidence for massive events like colliding stars and asteroid impacts on Earth and the Moon, but none of these events ever actually happened. Why?

Lawney lying? Really So what are they lying about? Can you tell me what you believe, your theory of the beginning, the first "cause" that brought about the effect? I would love to hear your side.

Is it possible that you're actually this stupid?

Agree

Nothing lines up with biblical creation.

​@@JB-yb4wnExcept truth, which is apparently foreign to you.

@@kathleennorton7913 And what truth is that, Kathleen? That the Earth was created before the sun? That there is a firmament dome like structure covering the Earth? That there was a worldwide flood that every civilization at the time seemed to have missed? That I should buy slaves? Treat women like garbage? Commit mass murder in god's name? It's all there in the bible, along with murdering 42 children by bear mauling for calling someone "baldy". These are the truths you talking about?

@@kathleennorton7913 How so? Pretty sure there is a lot of unscientific nonsense in the creation story, if you dont read it through rose-red glasses.

@@Yamyatos God is not bound by the laws of science. He created them and is over them. You can't argue against God's existence with the idea that He is limited to the natural order as you understand it, for He is not.

Paradigmbuster - good contention 👍 I like it . . Makes sense

Don't read much, do you?

you have to look at the way the Creationists answer this issue, and then make questions...

Stars are all sorts of distances from earth, from 4 light years to millions upon millions. Nothing fits with any biblical story.

If you were using the Demon Core plutonium sphere as a clock, and the day they placed the nickel casing over it, it would have instantly gone from counting seconds and minutes to millions of years, and that demon core clock would say we’re living in the year 300,000,000 AD. This stuff is actually quite a bit like the Matrix, or like Plato’s allegory of the cave… A global flood event explains petrified trees standing straight up through the so called “millions of years of sediment”… We all went to college, I went to college and studied the exact same stuff you did. The whole thing is I don’t necessarily believe that the purpose of getting an education is because this society just cares about you so very much that they want you to know the truth! They have a product to sell. That’s why you know so much about how to get that petroleum out f the ground to run the cars. Imagining a circumstance where this realm was created requires intelligence and imagination, and no professor is going to help their students imagine better. It’s a simulation. That’s why Jiffy turns into the Jif, and Addidas becomes adidas, reality is not stable, based on rational hard line nuts and bolts baseline reality, we live in a planet that’s more like a copy of some other reality. Specialization may not help you here, you may have to be generally able to understand many things, like a polymath or some autodidactic person…you may have to be like a child! A child who finds all things curious and worthy of investigation, and you need to also be suspicious.

It is blind leading the blind. Try looking through a difference lens and listen to the eye witness.

You gave NO evidence why, you just stated what you are.

@@2fast2block One needs far more space than I could use on here, even if I had the time. The scientific evidence for 4 billion years of earth history and the emergence of life about 800 million years ago and the gradual evolution is clear and anyone who will not accept it is deluded

@@user-ld6ot3pw1s In diamonds, c14 is found, that can't be with your 4 billion year earth. Life never has been shown to come about on its own. Life only comes from life. Your schooling didn't make you smarter.

Will keep that in mind; would be nice if it was free online!

They can definitely make diamonds in the lab. You can't tell the difference so these man made diamonds have a code etched on them so when a jeweller looks at them he knows they are man made. P.S. They can also make anthracite coal in the lab, but it's more expensive than getting out of the ground. They have also made coal outside placing wood underground and using pressure. It took 9 months.

@@Ariella-mx3xq4cw6n Gee Norma, my wife is a gemmologist, and I can tell you that it is dead easy to tell the difference between natural and lab diamonds. The natural diamonds have inclusions, impurities like nitrogen and boron that give natural diamonds a tint, you just need a decent stereo microscope, that is all. The FTC does not require diamonds to have a code etched on them Sec. 6, 5, 38 Stat. 721, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46, 45 but they require dealers to not sell lab diamonds as natural diamonds. Canadian diamonds are etched to differentiate them from conflict diamonds, so they may be purchased with the knowledge of where they came from and that children were not exploited in the mining of Canadian diamonds. Has nothing to do with lab diamonds at all. As to making coal, so what? It was made in a lab simulating thousands and thousands of years of a natural process. The process for making lab coal with sophisticated machinery doesn't exist in a natural environment. Or do you not know this?

​@@JB-yb4wnDon't you know, about the scientists who made coal in 9 months out side. Dr Grady McMurtry. Coal in lab in 3 days they are that good? As for diamonds when they first became viable as jewelry the science programmes were certainly saying this was worry. Maybe your wife is too young to remember. They said they would put codes for the safety of Joe public, Oh dear they don't?. Scientist know the earth is young. They won't admitted because of their religious faith in evolution, faith only, no science. They also know carbon 14, radiometric dating, dendrology and any other dating methods you can think of don't work. Scientist have known since the 70s C14 doesn't work There are 2 types of science 1) Knowledge of the present based observation. 5 senses. testing. 2) Knowledge in the past is historical science we weren't there. Present we can see Past we cannot see. Have you heard of the hamasaurus or the fedorasaurus both modern day fossils. Fossilised ham and fedora. Also a bell found in rocks supposedly millions of years old. How about poly-straight fossils going through so called millions of years of rock. Dinosaurs that still have pliable skin and Red Cells, impossible for them to be millions of years old. Dr Mary Schweitzer first discovered it. PS Man can make better diamonds?

C14 dating only works on something that was once alive. Diamonds were never alive. Coal can be contaminated by organic material seeping into the ground. Tho so-called dinosaur tissue does not contain any DNA. Snelling is feeding you BS and he knows it. I would like to see him debate a real geologist. He would get torn apart.

Nobel prize is about as meaningful as Hitler being man of the year on the cover of Time.

@baddoc69..God=The Father Son Spirit Was Is Always telling us to "Rest" in His Son Jesus Christ Alone not in man. And the Sabbath Day of Rest means just that and points out that He gave us The Sabbath Day to Rest in Him Who Is The Creator of all things!...does that make sense?..it does to me. Thank You Father Blessed and Holy Is Your Name Amen.

In the same verse it also says that 1000 years is as a day! People like to pick and choose what they like out of the Bible and ignore everything else

@@hollybooth6946 Genesis was never meant to be taken literally

Agreed. Given the intercontinental scale of various layers containing fossils throughout the strata would tell me something big happened, and it happened quickly.

complete bollocks. There is precisely zero evidence in the fossil record or elsewhere for a young Earth.

God lives outside of time and that is why God sees one day as a thousand years.

The chronology in the Septuagint is a few hundred years longer than in the Masoretic Text. Both are flawed: The imminent millennial reign of Christ on earth coincides with Yahweh's 2nd 'day' of rest - "and His rest shall be glorious" because His Son is ruling on earth for that 1000-year-day. So if Yahweh's first "day" of rest was ALSO a thousand-year-day, in which Adam died at 930 years old "in the same day" he sinned, and Adam was also made near the end of the previous 6th 'day', then we are currently near the end of the 13th thousand-year-day which actually ends on the "great and dreadful day of the Lord" on the 20th March 2031.

The context has nothing to do with explaining what a day is, it's about God not being bound by time. You still have to understand what a day means to understand what a 1000 years mean. It's your silly attempt to avoid the obvious meaning of what a day means.

The earth is 4 billion years old

Do you still practice blood sacrifice as well? Of course not, why is that? The reason God fearing people today no longer practice blood sacrifice is because that was the old Covenant. The same reason that God has suffered that the temple of Jerusalem has been destroyed for 2000 years. He no longer requires it, because the holy spirit is with us now. Jesus promised that. We are under a new Covenant with Jesus, the New Testament, the answer to your question is there. The atonement changed many things.

Interesting. Well done

Ah. So god created the universe, waited some 13 billion years, then made the planet and created life.. and everything else that tells us this is impossible is simply wrong. Such as no genetic bottlenecks existing, or the fact that there is individual organisms like trees and sponges older than that amount of time.

@Yamyatos If you have a tree that's 4000 years old a previous generation tree would be decomposed so one cannot compare ring widths to get 2 generations of trees. If you date a sponge by the rock surrounding it the rock particulates would have age before forming the fossil. With carbon 14 leaching can occur so the original carbon cannot be dated. Since God made the celestial bodies to be observed then it reasonable God waited till the light reached the earth from the most distant stars before placing life on it.

You are stupid and ignorant. How about you google up stuff first then you wouldn't say such inane things.

Dont forget flat. And hollow.

Where can we find this weird planet?

​@@Yamyatos Where does it say it's flat and hollow?

@@Hydroverse It was a joke. Earth is as little flat and hollow as it is fixed, immovable or young.

@@Yamyatos I gathered you're making a joke. Just wondering where exactly you got the idea of it being flat and hollow from.

Is science always 100% correct? Do they never err? Who taught the earth was flat, who practiced blood letting for centuries? Why do the : brianeacts tell us one thing on TV about what we should not eat or drink and how much, . then 6 months later recapiulate....:well upon futh er investigation, we have reconsidered our original findings." Yeah right!!! You just keep telling yourself that science has all the answers,

That you happened by chance, no plan, no purpose, no future vs you are priceless, created in the image of the Designer(God) with the purpose to help others and appreciate the wonder and beauty around you just as God has shown His love for you by creating you with a future of eternity with Him and unimaginable exploits of this awesome universe if you believe He exists.

What cult is that?

@@2fast2block The stupid cult that has zero understanding about how the laws of thermodynamics applies to a closed system.

The Darwinian cult is worse than sad, it is pathetic.

​@@2fast2blockyoung earth creationism

@@Doctorwhofan451 The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, energy can only change forms, energy creation/destruction can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point. Now you tell me how creation happened naturally, with science.

The chronology in the Septuagint is a few hundred years longer than in the Masoretic Text. Both are flawed: The imminent millennial reign of Christ on earth coincides with Yahweh's 2nd 'day' of rest - "and His rest shall be glorious" because His Son is ruling on earth for that 1000-year-day. So if Yahweh's first "day" of rest was ALSO a thousand-year-day, in which Adam died at 930 years old "in the same day" he sinned, and Adam was also made near the end of the previous 6th 'day', then we are currently near the end of the 13th thousand-year-day which actually ends on the "great and dreadful day of the Lord" on the 20th March 2031.

​@Michael-pn5lp um...you do know the Bible says no one except for the father knows the day...or maybe you're just trolling 😮

@@midnitglory what day ? ! Read again carefully.

As I read the comments I have 2 beloved dogs by my side and a beloved cat. They are wonderful company, but they are not conversant nor are they truly able to fulfill my human needs for companionship. I have been home from work a couple of hours as I write this and I would enjoy a conversation with my own species.

Another question for YEC is: "Why was Adam in a hurry to name all the animals in one day?"

In other words, when you read mythology, you can interpret it any way you like.

@@stevepierce6467 Exactly. And I was quoting St Augustine.

God rested on the 7th day, blessed it, sanctified it, and says why. I got that from the bible all about the 7th day that you say didn't occur.

No, it says they were done on that day.

​@@2fast2blockwoosh...

@@Fordry meaning what? Can you just speak?

@@2fast2block It's a joke. "Took all day..." That wasn't a serious comment.

​@@2fast2blockit was a joke saying that GOD took full 24 hour days to create rather than instantaneous

They talk about it briefly in the Global flood video but not really in enough detail

@@peterm707 thanks

I know thats a common argument that "water can form things quickly", but it's founded in scientific ignorance. The materials there were mostly mud and ash. We know water cuts through that quickly. You cannot compare something like that to the grand canyon, or other similar features, which it is oftentimes compared to. One does not follow the other.

look up Mt St Helens and the Young Earth Creationists...

@@philipbuckley759 👍 thanks Philip

this pope does not hold to Catholic doctrine....

Who cares what the Pope believes, althought he may believe himself a God-man, it don't mattter a bit. The Catholic church is full of pagan doctrines and have blood all over their hands. Study your Christian history! I'd like to buy the Pope for what he is worth and sell him for what he thinks he's worth.

The Sadducee Temple priests officiated the weekly Sabbaths and High Days at the time of Christ, who never contested their solar calendar. In 66AD the Pharisee Anti-Roman (Anti-Fasse/ANTIFA) Zealot rebels, seized control of the Temple. When contested for control, 20000 Judean 'Jewish' Edomites assisted the Zealots and murdered most of the Sadducee aristocracy, priests and hundreds of the Jerusalem populace. The ANTIFA Zealot rebels then appointed their own accursed lunar calendar high priest, who was the last to be seen standing in the Holy Place when THREE AND A HALF YEARS later, the prince of the Roman Empire arrived and desolated Jerusalem, Judea and the Jews in 70 AD - culminating in the taking of Masada another THREE AND A HALF YEARS AFTERWARDS. Most of the Christians, remembering Christ's words, escaped to Jordan between the two sieges of Jerusalem - the first siege by General Gallus who then strangely withdrew from Judea, and the second by "prince" Titus son of the new Emperor. These SEVEN YEARS are the fulfillment of Daniels prophesy. Surviving Pharisees continued to enforce their lunar calendar 'sabbaths and high days' in the Synagogues, which they controlled - hiding the Sadducee Temple calendar from the people. Constantine managed to establish the Resurrection day as Sunday in 30 AD on their Julian calendar, which actually overlapped the Biblical weekly Sabbath THAT year. Unable to establish the Biblical calendar, Constantine changed Sunday to the first day of his new Roman week, in honour of the Resurrection. Later Constantine's son Constantius ll, knowing the Pharisee's lunar interpretation of the Biblical calendar to be Babylonian and Canaanite, forbade them from signaling the start of their lunar months across the Empire from Jerusalem. As a concequence, Hillel ll was forced to choose a Roman day for their weekly 'sabbath', and he chose Saturday - the seventh day of Constantine's NEW Roman week. The rest of their lunar calendar they kept by Rabbinical calculation. Thus the true Biblical Temple calendar was lost until the discovery of the Dead Sea Scroll's. The Dead Sea Scroll's solar calendar, corrected to the Sadducee 19th Abib Omer Wave Sheaf, is the correct Biblical calendar, revealing the weekly Sabbaths and High Days - which is why the Zionist State of Israel suppressed them for 40 years before they were leaked out on micro fish copies. Saturday was only chosen as the Jewish 'sabbath' by Heliel II about 300 years after Christ. He standadised the Jewish calendar. Even before that, the weekly 'sabbath' they kept was the Babylonian lunar 'sabbath' that the Pharisees introduced and enforced in the Synagogues, after the Temple was destroyed in 70AD. The true weekly Sabbath was already hidden by the Pharisees in favour of the Babylonian lunar interpretation of the Biblical calendar. Knowing this, Constantine's son forbade them from signaling their pagan lunar calendar observations across the Roman Empire. However Constantine himself was unable to determine the true Biblical weekly Sabbath, but he was able to determine that Christ was resurrected in that year on the Roman solar calendars "Sunday". Therefore, in honour of the resurrection he changed Sunday to the first day of his NEW Roman week, and also made Sunday the day of rest. Without Roman authority to signal their Babylonian lunar 'sabbath' across the empire, Hillel II and other anti-Christ Jews were forced to choose a Roman weekday as their "new sabbath" and he chose the seventh day of Constantine's new Roman week - i.e. "Saturday" ! Rabbi 'Sages' don't tell you all this and most Rabbis don't even know this themselves ! Karaite Jews today still keep the Babylonial lunar calendar and many Christians have been seduced into doing the same. Jericho was an ancient lunar calendar observation city dedicated to and named after their moon god. The Bible called Jericho the "accursed city" and Joshua was commanded to totally destroy it and its inhabitants after marching around it once for six consecutive days, and seven times on the seventh day - i.e. 13 times in total ! I think that, as opposed to the Second Advent and the "Marriage of the Lamb" that nobody knows when, the preceding "great and dreadful day of the Lord" can actually be established as the 20th March 2031. The world will feel that ominous consuming fire approaching and will run around trying to hide, while Christians enter into their inner prayer "chambers". When the Christians come out, there will be no OTHER flesh and blood survivers - who will be burnt up and trodden "as ash under their feet." They will mourn for their friends and relatives who weren't "saved", but SOMETIME afterwards will witness the return of Christ coming from east to west. Raising their eyes they will be transformed in an instant, allowing them to rise up and meet His RETURN. Thereafter, they will be consoled when He "wipes the tears" from their eyes and takes care of them like as "calves of the stall". That's how I perceive these future Biblical events. Don't the dead in Christ rise "first" - a great multitude ? Then those living Christians that are "left" come safely out of their prayer chambers - AFTER the "wrath", to "tread upon the ashes of the wicked who have been removed from the earth" - "The righteous shall NEVER be removed but the wicked shall be cut off". These "saved" righteous remnant "lift up their eyes", and are then "changed in the twinkling of an eye", and able to rise up and meet Christ returning with this great host..... The chronology in the Septuagint is a few hundred years longer than in the Masoretic Text. Both are flawed: The imminent millennial reign of Christ on earth coincides with Yahweh's 2nd 'day' of rest - "and His rest shall be glorious" because His Son is ruling on earth for that 1000-year-day. So if Yahweh's first "day" of rest was ALSO a thousand-year-day, in which Adam died at 930 years old "in the same day" he sinned, and Adam was also made near the end of the previous 6th 'day', then we are currently near the end of the 13th thousand-year-day which actually ends on the "great and dreadful day of the Lord" on the 20th March 2031.

@@Michael-pn5lp So a thousand year day and not a literal day?

A day is LIKE a thousand years, not that a day is literally 1000 years to God. It just means God is not bound by time like we are. The context of that verse is that people were mocking that Christ has not returned yet and the earth has been the same since the creation. But Peter says that God is not slow to fulfil His promise, but is patient. To us it seems like He is slow to fulfil His promise, but to God, since He is not bound by time, it has not been long at all. But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance. - 2 Peter 3:8-9

@@hollybooth6946 The Sadducee Temple priests officiated the weekly Sabbaths and High Days at the time of Christ, who never contested their solar calendar. In 66AD the Pharisee Anti-Roman (Anti-Fasse/ANTIFA) Zealot rebels, seized control of the Temple. When contested for control, 20000 Judean 'Jewish' Edomites assisted the Zealots and murdered most of the Sadducee aristocracy, priests and hundreds of the Jerusalem populace. The ANTIFA Zealot rebels then appointed their own accursed lunar calendar high priest, who was the last to be seen standing in the Holy Place when THREE AND A HALF YEARS later, the prince of the Roman Empire arrived and desolated Jerusalem, Judea and the Jews in 70 AD - culminating in the taking of Masada another THREE AND A HALF YEARS AFTERWARDS. Most of the Christians, remembering Christ's words, escaped to Jordan between the two sieges of Jerusalem - the first siege by General Gallus who then strangely withdrew from Judea, and the second by "prince" Titus son of the new Emperor. These SEVEN YEARS are the fulfillment of Daniels prophesy. Surviving Pharisees continued to enforce their lunar calendar 'sabbaths and high days' in the Synagogues, which they controlled - hiding the Sadducee Temple calendar from the people. Constantine managed to establish the Resurrection day as Sunday in 30 AD on their Julian calendar, which actually overlapped the Biblical weekly Sabbath THAT year. Unable to establish the Biblical calendar, Constantine changed Sunday to the first day of his new Roman week, in honour of the Resurrection. Later Constantine's son Constantius ll, knowing the Pharisee's lunar interpretation of the Biblical calendar to be Babylonian and Canaanite, forbade them from signaling the start of their lunar months across the Empire from Jerusalem. As a concequence, Hillel ll was forced to choose a Roman day for their weekly 'sabbath', and he chose Saturday - the seventh day of Constantine's NEW Roman week. The rest of their lunar calendar they kept by Rabbinical calculation. Thus the true Biblical Temple calendar was lost until the discovery of the Dead Sea Scroll's. The Dead Sea Scroll's solar calendar, corrected to the Sadducee 19th Abib Omer Wave Sheaf, is the correct Biblical calendar, revealing the weekly Sabbaths and High Days - which is why the Zionist State of Israel suppressed them for 40 years before they were leaked out on micro fish copies. Saturday was only chosen as the Jewish 'sabbath' by Heliel II about 300 years after Christ. He standadised the Jewish calendar. Even before that, the weekly 'sabbath' they kept was the Babylonian lunar 'sabbath' that the Pharisees introduced and enforced in the Synagogues, after the Temple was destroyed in 70AD. The true weekly Sabbath was already hidden by the Pharisees in favour of the Babylonian lunar interpretation of the Biblical calendar. Knowing this, Constantine's son forbade them from signaling their pagan lunar calendar observations across the Roman Empire. However Constantine himself was unable to determine the true Biblical weekly Sabbath, but he was able to determine that Christ was resurrected in that year on the Roman solar calendars "Sunday". Therefore, in honour of the resurrection he changed Sunday to the first day of his NEW Roman week, and also made Sunday the day of rest. Without Roman authority to signal their Babylonian lunar 'sabbath' across the empire, Hillel II and other anti-Christ Jews were forced to choose a Roman weekday as their "new sabbath" and he chose the seventh day of Constantine's new Roman week - i.e. "Saturday" ! Rabbi 'Sages' don't tell you all this and most Rabbis don't even know this themselves ! Karaite Jews today still keep the Babylonial lunar calendar and many Christians have been seduced into doing the same. Jericho was an ancient lunar calendar observation city dedicated to and named after their moon god. The Bible called Jericho the "accursed city" and Joshua was commanded to totally destroy it and its inhabitants after marching around it once for six consecutive days, and seven times on the seventh day - i.e. 13 times in total ! I think that, as opposed to the Second Advent and the "Marriage of the Lamb" that nobody knows when, the preceding "great and dreadful day of the Lord" can actually be established as the 20th March 2031. The world will feel that ominous consuming fire approaching and will run around trying to hide, while Christians enter into their inner prayer "chambers". When the Christians come out, there will be no OTHER flesh and blood survivers - who will be burnt up and trodden "as ash under their feet." They will mourn for their friends and relatives who weren't "saved", but SOMETIME afterwards will witness the return of Christ coming from east to west. Raising their eyes they will be transformed in an instant, allowing them to rise up and meet His RETURN. Thereafter, they will be consoled when He "wipes the tears" from their eyes and takes care of them like as "calves of the stall". That's how I perceive these future Biblical events. Don't the dead in Christ rise "first" - a great multitude ? Then those living Christians that are "left" come safely out of their prayer chambers - AFTER the "wrath", to "tread upon the ashes of the wicked who have been removed from the earth" - "The righteous shall NEVER be removed but the wicked shall be cut off". These "saved" righteous remnant "lift up their eyes", and are then "changed in the twinkling of an eye", and able to rise up and meet Christ returning with this great host..... The chronology in the Septuagint is a few hundred years longer than in the Masoretic Text. Both are flawed: The imminent millennial reign of Christ on earth coincides with Yahweh's 2nd 'day' of rest - "and His rest shall be glorious" because His Son is ruling on earth for that 1000-year-day. So if Yahweh's first "day" of rest was ALSO a thousand-year-day, in which Adam died at 930 years old "in the same day" he sinned, and Adam was also made near the end of the previous 6th 'day', then we are currently near the end of the 13th thousand-year-day which actually ends on the "great and dreadful day of the Lord" on the 20th March 2031. There is no doubt that Christ spent three full nights and three full days in the tomb, but how long did He hang on the tree/stake/cross ? Surely even in death Yahshua fulfilled every law of His Father ! i.e. Christ could not have been left on the cross overnight for nearly 12 hours before a “morning start of day”, or 18 hours before a “mid- day start of day” ! The day therefore does indeed start at sunset ! John 19:31 supports the view that Christ was crucified and died on the afternoon of the 14th Abib preparation day, was taken down from the cross and placed in the tomb at eventide/sunset demarcating the days. The 15th Abib Passover High Day Sabbath then commenced at sunset. Christ had to be off the cross by sunset. He was in the tomb for three full nights and three full days before His 4th day resurrection - as Lord of the Sabbath Day on the next WEEKLY Sabbath, which was the “First of the Sabbaths” after the Passover, initiating the Feast of Weeks count to Pentecost.

This is all bunk! God's word declares that the earth is millions upon millions of years old. II Peter 3:5-7 is just one place. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth PERIOD. It doesn't say when.

conjecture......end of story....

​@@philipbuckley759you dont understand what it means

Wish I had said that!

You're too easily impressed.

No kidding?!

YEC is a cult, they couldn't care less about your arguments Btw, Chicago Statement classified YEC as bad hermeneutics. So I agree with you 100%

The Septuagint is a Greek translation of the Old Testament from its original language, Hebrew, the Masoretic text.

@@rubiks6 the hebrew today is rabbinic

I dunno, because I would use a book on geology.

The chronology in the Septuagint is a few hundred years longer than in the Masoretic Text. Both are flawed: The imminent millennial reign of Christ on earth coincides with Yahweh's 2nd 'day' of rest - "and His rest shall be glorious" because His Son is ruling on earth for that 1000-year-day. So if Yahweh's first "day" of rest was ALSO a thousand-year-day, in which Adam died at 930 years old "in the same day" he sinned, and Adam was also made near the end of the previous 6th 'day', then we are currently near the end of the 13th thousand-year-day which actually ends on the "great and dreadful day of the Lord" on the 20th March 2031.

@@Michael-pn5lp The bible is not a science book. If you really want to know what the age of the planet is, then read a geology textbook. If you want to live in blessed ignorance, then carry on.

conjecture......

Fair point, but why stop there? If everything had to be explained naturally, then you have no God as God's abilities become indistinguishable from an ordinary human's. The only argument for the supernatural is the miraculous, which cannot be tested within the confinement of the scientific method.

If only the book had been dictated and written by someone with perfect knowledge who could know the confusion these words and terms would cause, and who could then make sure to write everything clearly so there'd be no confusion. Especially since, from what I've been told, getting that book wrong because of confusion gets you put on the naughty list.

@@mrastin821 According to the wise, God takes the wise in their own foolishness. Science cannot eliminate God and have any hope of being ultimately correct.

@@mrastin821 God has perfect knowledge of how he created the universe. People do not have perfect knowledge of how God created the universe. Like Paul says and scientists agree, for now we understand "in part". Nobody except God knows everything.

Then what does it mean???

@@priscillajervey8345 The word translated day in Genesis is "yom". Like many English words, many Hebrew and Greek words also have multiple meanings. Yom has several meanings, including day, time itself and a lengthy period of time. It is used in all three ways in the Old Testament. Thus, the idea that the earth was created in six days is no more valid than saying it was created in 6 lengthy periods of time. Especially, since the sun isn't mentioned until the 4th yom.

That's a fair point, but then the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics eventually conflicts with the first law because it states that the total available energy is being depleted. To get what we have today requires one compromises one of those two laws. To do so requires something beyond what's natural. This is where people get the idea that it must be supernatural.

@@Hydroverse not depleted just being used to which it cycles back into. Energy cycles as it expands, which is the universe and everything within it and of it. Planets form over eons of time and eventually go supernova only to have newer planets reform over eons of time, several million years or more, and the flowers and plants that die in the fall come back in the spring. Everything is energy and it cannot be destroyed nor created, it only cycles. The first and second laws are compatible with each other, not conflicting. Restudy that. Research it further, but not with misinterpreted apologetic and religious biases. Not saying that you I'm just saying there is a lot of misinformation out there. So be careful

@@Hydroverse not being depleted just used until it goes back into. Energy cycles and everything is energy, everything, it cannot be destroyed nor created it only cycles as it expands. The first and second laws complete each as one ends and the other begins and so on. Planets go supernova and new ones reform over eons of time, flowers that die in the fall grow back in the spring. Cycles. Research this further without any apologetic religion twisted biases of misinformation. Not saying that you are just there's a lot of misinterpreted misinformation out there. Try quantum mechanics application studies.

@@allanlee9520 Interesting thought I guess. However, planets don't go supernova. Stars go supernova.

@@Hydroverse like the sun. What we see as points of light called stars is the light from galaxies. Our Milky Way from millions of light years would look like a star. And is a star. Our Sun ( what I mean by planet) will eventually go supernova.

I loved this comment.

What does that statement mean? God said it would be best that we copy his working testimony work 6 days and rest on the seventh. After studying human health that has been proven that we need rest of one day out of the week. Now if you choose to work 7 days a week that is your choice but know your health will be compromised.

Sun was made on day four. Prove to us differently Were you there to see it millions of years ago? Do you know someone who was? What peer reviewed papers do you have to back up this non scientific claim? And if you have one was the author here millions of years ago to document it? You know you know no human lived millions of years ago

@@ianmonk6211 The problem you have is that the leprechaun at the bottom of my garden created everything but he does not want the fame and so created god to take the credit so your god is just my leprechauns invention and does not really exist. The leprechaun told me lots of things he even told me the lottery numbers once.

@@ianmonk6211 I do know someone who was there and they assure me sun was formed long before the earth and not by some creature you call god.

@@truthgiver8286 you know that's a lie. Even your own evolution experts tell you no people were around millions of years ago.

@@truthgiver8286 creature means created being. God is not a created being. Satan however is. He is the father of lies and is behind every thought and actions behind denying the f Father and Son God head

It was to demonstrate that the Israelites had broken God’s moral law.

@@domblack6288 By the Israelites, do you mean everybody, or just the Israelites?

@@ClementGreen I’m confused by your question.

@@domblack6288 Well if we are all descended from Adam and Eve, then we have all broken God's moral law, so why did Moses smash the tablets just to demonstrate this to the Israelites?

He was angrey. If you read the scriptures of this incidence, you will know why he did!!

Snelling is a poor excuse for a scientist. He admittedly starts with the Bible and invents evidence to fit his belief. That’s not how scientific investigations work.

The bible say there was light before stars. The bible says bats are birds. The bible says pi is 3. The list goes on. Unless you read it through rose-red glasses there is a lot of nonsense in the bible. Certainly not science.

@@Yamyatos That's true light did come before stars. Light actually exists independently of its source if you think about it. Light is energy but stars are matter.

@@ezekielfenstermaker6435 There is two possible interpretations. Either it meant the suns light, in which case light would have to come after the stars. Given the context this makes more sense. But if you argue it means "light itself", nothing should come before that, and genesis starts by creating the heavens and the earth, and then talks about water, before light gets created. So either way is not backed by science.

Science cannot prove or disprove it because science deals with what we can observe in the present which we neither can do with a young earth or an old earth history. The Bible tells us that God creates things in a way that may not make sense to us at first but we need to remember to let the past guide how we view the present, not the other way around. God doesn’t need stars to have light, He created light before He made the stars.

No it doesn't

Believing in someone no one's ever seen, that's just stupid

You don't need the Sun for the day. All that is necessary is a light source as Earth rotates on its axis, which was made on the first day.

The Bible IS a work of man. Just because it claims to be the "word of god" doesn't make it so. It's full of unprovable myths and scientific errors, and all the evidence points to the universe being 13 billion years old.

Unless you have a Christian who doesn't think their beliefs through in order to conclude that they are knowingly calling God a liar.

When you prove there's a god, which no one's ever did,

So you tune in to ridicule everything you don’t believe or do you reserve that for my brother in Christ? Maybe think why you would..🤷🏽‍♂️🙋🏽‍♂️

@@karakuri100p Why do _you_ think I would?

@@cardcounter21 cause I’m genuinely wondering why you tuned in and what you base your belief/ideology in life on. It’s probably gonna include folk who were fallible but we shouldn’t pay attention to that right? On the other hand we have a “man” of someone could call Him that , who existence fascinated and fascinates people around the globe. If we would go by majority through out time, believers in a god ain’t so far fetched. Loads of nobel prize winning scientists are theists too so given their field , they shouldn’t have… Science btw only works if the parameters are consistent and if we find laws of nature, it implies a lawgiver who ain’t bound by the laws of nature/physiques. Time and space are created non tangible concepts too and they are laws too so it must be what ever it is , ain’t bound by time or space. And lastly, only a person has a will, to make the decision to do a thing, so whoever created everything is a personal entity that ain’t bound by the created universe or it’s rules/laws and it’s unseen too. Can you give me someone who fits the description? Otherwise use your reasoning ability , let’s not attack each other and think this through, we ain’t just fleshy machines…and creation didn’t always exist, so what caused all of this?

@@karakuri100p _"whoever created everything is a personal entity that ain’t bound by the created universe or it’s rules/laws and it’s unseen too. Can you give me someone who fits the description?"_ Zeus, Odin, Osiris, Brahma, Shiva, Apollo, Jupiter, Vishnu, Diana, Minerva, Poseidon, Hades, Amen Ra, Ganesha, Guanyin... And quite a few more! And why should 'whoever created everything' be a _personal_ entity? Why not a mystical, unknowable, force? _"I’m genuinely wondering why you tuned in"_ Anthropological and intellectual curiosity!

@@cardcounter21 we got any proof for them , witnesses and even hostile witnesses? No , for Yeshua yes. Ancient historians know better than us what happened in their times right? Check Flavius Josephus antiquette of the jews for that history and same with writings from Suetonius , Tacitus, Pliny the Elder , Pliny the younger , check History of the Latter Han dynasty for even a super natural claim to be attested to. They even testify to the claims made in the gospel accounts and the early church testify to their environment as well. On the other thing, every civilization had references to a god or gods trying to explain nature and the meta physique, the unseen reality like emotions , moral and the like. But like you implied, if god or the gods are truly like the creation even being flawed , god ain’t transcendently and would be dependent on creation for its attributes. Check all of them you mentioned for their moral character and see for yourself why they shouldn’t be followed.. Rather we have Yeshua who history attests to and His moral teachings and general life teachings are everywhere. Stolen out of the Bible books, in self help books , used in business strategies in the wrong way sometimes etc. Again, any of them “gods” life teachings that great? “Treat others like you wanna be treated “ is a teaching straight from the lips of Yeshua. How come it’s a global thing that solely originated from this one arbitrary dude from ages ago? Must be something special that this carpenter inspired the lives of so many decades, hundreds, thousands of years later. Check the sources I mentioned referring back to Yeshua or the early christians and don’t be shy, hit me up again if you got more questions. Again, we are told not to fight each other but to reason with each other.

The only issue with that is that Christ is called the father of eternity.

Is a supernatural creation a joke? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

God creating, is that false? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

Keep telling yourself that.

@priscillajervey8345 I shall. The Earth is about 4.5 billions of years old.

@@klouis1886 YT loves shadow banning my comments, so I'll try again. God creating, is that false? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

As an atheist, you accept that it happened all on its own, do tell how. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

@@2fast2block Please read my comment.

Creationism is not about science, it's about theology. And a theology that is faulty in any real logic and reasoning by its structure. True evident facts and proven knowledge do not require beliefs to support it at all. Undeniable facts can withstand any and all harsh scrutiny and examination, whereas beliefs need to rearrange and reinterpret facts to support a belief. Beliefs are not facts, just beliefs. Any faith is not evidence to anything factual.

Ultimately, there really is no such thing as supernatural, it's just natural. What makes it "super" is that it can't be explained yet or we haven't evolved up to that level of knowledge to make that discovery, but there indeed is a viable explanation in this real reality. "Supernatural" is a word to describe what we see as something apart from nature, but there's no such thing. We are learning and discovering answers to deeper questions of life and our universe. There is more to discover and uncover. We will get there. Miracles do happen daily but they are not "magic", nor "supernatural" by any means. We need to look, study, and observe on the quantum level of physics and more.

@@1984Kojot so you do believe God created but where did the bible say earth took 5 days to create? You do believe in God but not the God of the bible because God it wrong about literal days. You do believe but not what the bile says about the genealogies of time. About Adam and Eve, etc. What book do you believe in?

Who wrote bible??Humans or God?

@@1984Kojot God inspired humans what to write. It's made clear in the bible but you still want to ask your silly question.

@@2fast2block It was inspired but everything is inspired by source of creation. Those are not his words. He did not write any book. Bible could get it all wrong.

@@1984Kojot you ask a question, I showed what the bible says how God inspired people to write what God wanted, and you simply ignore it. The bible does say how it was written and you ignore it. How is the bible all wrong? You clearly don't even know what it says!

@@2fast2block We do not know to what extend it was inspired and what ppl put into it by themselfs. Bible message is very open to interpretation and inconsistent. Influenced by many cultures adopting their myths.

Day is defined by a light source, which includes the Sun, but doesn't require it.

@@Hydroverse no. Day is define by period of time. Like in the north pole, no light for 6 months. What is a day there? But Genesis 1 is a song. It should not be refer to as one literal day in reading it. It does not have to be refer as sequencial also. 🙏 🙏 Just the meaning. God created earth. God created stars and sun. God created human. Etc.

@@Jocky8807 I'm defining day as God did. He called the light 'day' and the darkness 'night'. That aside, one would have to assume Earth's axial tilt was at 23.5° at the time of creation in order for the North or South Pole to have been in total darkness or light.

YEC is a cult. It's not Bible nor Science

Sounds like the religion of atheism

@@erasmus6121 Do humans have a "religion instinct" naturally? Dr. Andrew Newburg, a neuroscientist who studies the brain in light of religious experiences, has spent his career following this very hunch. In his studies Dr. Newburg addresses that if you contemplate God long enough something surprising happens in the brain. Neural functioning begins to change. New synaptic connections are made, new dendrites are formed, perception alters. If God has meaning for you then God becomes neurologically real to you. Of course, this goes for any religious faith as well. He has written in his studies and lectures that religious experience satisfies two basic functions of the brain: self-maintenence and self-transcendence. Dr. Newburg and his team take brain scans of people participating in religious experiences. His studies and findings are still continuing, only thus far concluding, it is in how the human brain works through behavioral patterns of the parietal lobe located in the upper back part of the cortex. It is suspected we may have evolved this way according to his studies. To believe is to be human. Tell me the reasons why you don't believe in the other God's or any of the other religions of this world? Because THAT is the same reason why I don't believe in yours. Myths and fairy tales.

@@erasmus6121 Religion: a system of organized beliefs and practices typically centered around the worship of supernatural forces or being(s). Science: the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence, experimentation, information gathering, observation, as benchmarks for testing a hypothesis. Magical creation by a supernatural deity will always get contradicted by real facts and experienced educational knowledge. Beliefs are not science, just theology. Science is not bias at all, people are, science is just a methology of study, it proves or disproves---period! The scientific methods are purposefully designed to eliminate bias because every study must be objectively verified and there must be a way to prove it wrong if indeed it is. Accuracy and accountability are the hallmarks of study in science, no exception. Inaccuracies are put to the test constantly until obvious evidence bears accurate findings that are factually true indisputably.

Read Genesis the earth is not young. Really read it and think.

@@danielswartz6818 I've read Genesis. I agree the Earth is not young.