He only bring highschool droupout.

Just saw a 23 year old name Jackson Hinkle destroy a much older but not wise😅 Pierce Morgan in a interview.

@@SB-ct9mk Richard Dawkins, Neil deGrasse Tyson ?

You can't even spell the man's name...

Piers Morgan would just talk over and yell at him. "He saved Britain...". "You're being woke..." Etc. That's how the interview would go on TalkTV or GB news.

Thomas he sent a battle ship up the Mersey ready to fire on us , I still can’t believe that he was voted the greatest Briton not so long ago he was an absolute twat

Mind Begs the Question: Hitler - Jews unsafe to German Values,Identity If Politicians/Govts - Muslims unsafe to Western Values,Identity Practicing Hitlers mein kampf,no?

Many others from Liverpool would hate him too if they knew the truth of the sinking of the Lusitania. There is a good documentary film on youtube called 'Murder on the Atlantic' with good facts in it i believe from what i have researched (Churchill was first lord of the admiralty at the time and 'wanted' the sinking to get the US to join the war). My great grandfather lived on the Wirral, was one of the helmsmen and lost his life/was killed on the Lusitania.

Same here! My Gran (would now be 95 now but we lost her 7 years ago) hated the man! Thought of him as a great betrayer of the post war social reform project, an untrustworthy aristocrat, and if she’d been alive to see all the info on the Bengali stuff would have hated him for that too

They were in the end. Everyone was

What a nice story and comment.

Loved Dave Allen.😊❤

Thank you for having the moral courage to stand for the liberty of all people against tyranny. There are geniuses, luminaries and revolutionaries of all stripes and solidarity is of working people and kf liberation is where it starts. Don't let the flame of righteous indignation be snuffed by convenient bigotry. They keep us punching our neighbors instead of punching up.

♥️🙏👌🙏🙏♥️🙌🏽🙌🏽

Nor these fake churches

Because it is utter nonsense.

@@archiebald4717how?

Yes, I agree. I’ve stopped watching corporate media.

Corporate media is Marxist media.

The you realised it was the whiff of sulphur you'd smelt.

And the story your mum told you was utter bollocks - Churchill recalled the troops that someone else had sent.

​@@Pippins666You said similar under another comment re the Glasgow strikers. As home Secretary then, was Winston not in control, or was he always drunk down at the club whilst underlings ran the country, is that what you are suggesting?

@@onanysundrymule3144 link please to my comment about the Glasgow strikers

His favourite whiskey was Johnny Walker red label...very cheap whiskey...stop with ur cheap shots!

Good.

He was also a bankrupt drunk forever indebted to Jews...didn't he bother to mention that?

👍

Who gives a shit about your grandfather and what he thinks?

Your grandfather sounds like a loser.

Oh you forgot the new motto he was about to release when Germany was on the eve of winning the battle of Britain…. You can always take one with you Planning to give arms to women, children and elderly to do that. Same Hitler did in 45 and till today called despicable and it is indeed but what does it say about Churchill?

Wow😮 thanks for the input. History lessons in school don’t teach you anything of the sort, except that Churchill was a popular and charismatic leader.

@niccolamachiavelli8094 Wrong, my Grandfather was heavily involved in the evacuation plan. From the beginning of the war there was a RN ship docked at Scapa Flow which was ready to take the RF and the government to Canada. Like my Grandfather said he had no idea which beach etc Churchill would be fighting from, but it sure as hell wouldn't be in the UK.

Rubbish

My dad used to say that

Im Irish are you? We can speak for ourselves we dont need your patronising white liberal crap. Churchill was respected by Micheal Collins and vice versa. He didnt do us much harm he didnt get on with De' Valera many didnt in Eire a marmite Taosach. We dont need white English liberals help thank you Malcolm X was right about white liberals! They cannot be trusted and bite you from behind

Actually he was half American and part Irish. As for the Welsh? Churchill simply prefered the Jews to the Welsh because the Jews paid off his debts and elevated him to 'greatness'. That's why he happily sent the troops in to put down the Welsh uprisings against the Jews during the summer of 1911.

@@henryb160 he was no friend to the English either; having put troops and armed the police on the streets of London in 1912.

Churchill Worst kind full stop

Black and tans again

Of course Johnson called it tripe. He belittles all and can't tell the truth.

Does the deaths of two men somehow overpower the saving of the lives of tens of millions and the stopping of facism?

What is that meant to say,, I live where there are thousands of graves of young men women and children killed by "Churchill's troops " I live in Germany, ...You make war you confront the State with violence you take the risk it will work out badly, Such claims as the ones made by Ali are just a load of bunkum, No context history by people seeking advantage, The short clip below tells the reality of the incident you refer to, But usually people prefer to stay with the myths to embrace their enmities,

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pdmXgdGYybDdhH0.html

Boring boris the commie puppet.

No, the only history taught in schools is about how evil Hitler was and that they won the second world war. The colonial men, African and Indians, who died in fighting the disgusting war are never mentioned.

Ireland is interesting as over the centuries it ebb and flow. The various dynasties such as Normans, Tudors and in the modern times the William periodic era saw Ireland being reinvaded or lost and reinvaded although a place called Ulster the plantations was particularly valuable for Anglo-Scotch settlers. To be fair British schools do not educate people about the working class here or social struggles in 19th century like Chartists. There is football and 'news; whilst oligarchs own everything. Education system began in industrial revolution, when instead of dragging coal from deep mines on their backs children needed to learn how to push buttons on mechanical machines making cotton. Hence the three Rs were not really education for British workers.

All super powers have colonial mindset. The new economic powers like India and China too are following the brutal nationalist rightwing ideas of the 20th century west. China in Tibet,xingiang,India in J&K and north west are text book cases of colonial oppressions.

I never once heard of this side of Churchill at school or whenever he is spoken about. He’s only ever praised to the highest honour by brits. This really says a lot, that he never seems to be criticised for this. It’s just never spoken about; it’s all hush hush.

it was normal to be racist back then, it still is, we just aren't open about it like before. I wouldn't judge people back then in the same manner as we do now in terms of racism. Moreover, we are just as racist today, we just pretend not to be to appear good. Every person of every race is a bit racist, some obviously more than others but it is in our DNA to distrust other groups and favour our own. It's partly why our species are still kicking around after all these years. We are all animals when it comes down to that.

And the Irish refuse to attend their own parliament?

@@dianamincher6479 What parliament are you referring to?

I mean it could be argued that up until that point England had been quite exceptional. Ireland and it's history would have fared no differently with any other powerful, successful neughbour regardless of it's culture. The only historical scenario in which Ireland didn't suffer colonialism would be if they had been the half of the islands of Britain to outpace their eastern neighbours, at this point they would become the colonisers.

What you are saying is unclear. "...outpace their eastern neighbours". What does thid mean? Do you mean "outpace" in terms of industrialism? Colonizing is not just conquering and dispossessing and appropriating the resources and setting English landlords as overlords for 300 years; it is also the denigration of language and culture. @@charliecatesby3346

Churchill thought that the Irish were crazy in not wanting to be British

He was also unpopular with the the political class and the king

My father was of the same generation and said exactly the same

@@tonyatthebeachThe King pissed in the same proverbial pot as Elitist Churchill

they did just after the war!

Certainly not the impression my Grandmother, born in 1920 gave, Or others I have come across of a similar generation.

No, its that history tends to judge people less harshly than those who hated them would like. Churchill was a man of his age, by our standards he was a terrible person, but thats the benefit of hindsight.

@ bipolarminddroppings A man of his age ? Giving the go ahead to use chemical warfare against the Iraqis in the 1930s ?? I don’t think any man in 2023 or 1923 would see that as an honourable or justified way of fighting a war. Churchill was a cruel evil man in his own right.

@@bipolarminddroppings 'Man of his age'?, what date is the cut-off point by which we accept murder, genocide, racism, sexism, imperialism, etc. I can assure you there were plenty of people who called all this out in the early part of 20th centuary.

Glaswegians hate everybody. 🤢

He was a politician, that goes with the territory. He has been singled out in the common memory because of his leadership in WW2, without this there would be no confusion in him being railed against for his shortcomings. What has happened is that this wartime leadership has served to negate all of his failures, ironically in much the same way as this video tries to use his racism to negate any of his successes.

He convinced the Allies to invade Italy before the Normandy landings not because he thought it was easier but to protect the British Empire shipping routes in the Mediterranean. The Americans didn't realise this until the invasion was in full force

hang on calm down there's several flaws with what you were saying Churchill was was super racist but he is not as stupid as you are making it out to be 1. the invasion of Italy was because war support was declining and there was elements of rebellion the invasion finally made the rest stop sitting on the fence and depose Mussolini which happened the Mediterranean being secured for allied shipping was always at the forefront of planning no one was tricked or deceived 2. the disaster of Gallipoli was mostly actually the UK media's fault they are the ones that bragged about it in the news paper the invasion of Turkey was also an ANZAC battle not a British one the British did very little fighting as they sat on the beaches "resting" waiting for Australia and New Zealand to do all the work Gallipoli was so horrific that Churchill developed PTSD from it and tried to postpone D day and even forget about it entirely instead trying to secure Italy and move men into Austria and France he was more supportive of the invasion of Italy because it was going to be primarily airborne invasion of Turkey affected him more than you seem to realize two nations treated like shit so few returned sent to slaughter irreversibly damaging both nations close ties to the UK and will to support future war efforts and he knew it

@@indeed8211 According to eminent historians, Churchill had his own agenda from the start of the war and pushed hard for the invsasion of Italy to suit his plans: The “Soft Underbelly” US and British objectives were not the same. The British wanted to restore and protect the prewar empire, including the routes through Gibraltar and Suez to their colonies and possessions in Africa and Asia. The Americans regarded the Mediterranean and Middle East as a distraction from the main task of taking on the Germans. They were not interested in preservation of the British Empire. The Americans did find the operation harder than envisaged, thus the quoted 'tough old gut'

He sank the entire French navy which was waiting to fight on the Allied side.

But the British reelected him the next time around. Your mother clearly knows some history but not enough to make such sweeping statements.

As GHANDI lay dying by his body guards bullet, he was heard saying, " Churchill was right." India was not ready for Independence. Churchill tried to delay Independence for India. To PREVENT MASS MURDER HINDU AND MUSLIM CIVIL WAR.

@@lorenzo6mm I thought only Modi Lunatics in India get to know crazy stories.

I understand, an Irishman

Churchill was warning that the entire time and now people say it's evil colonialism, but Churchill was right about the coming bloodshed between Hindus and Muslims. And if he actually said then why isn't Gandhi dead- during a famine when millions of Indians starved (because of the typhoon and WW2) but Gandhi was on a perpetual hunger strike - how did he manage to eat enough - while hunger striking for politics while his fellows actually starved in earnest? @@lorenzo6mm

@@lorenzo6mmno he wasn’t

as compared to whom?

If you search hard enough you will always find someone to support your narrative. Twat

His alcoholism was a national embarrassment

Compared to Stalin? Roosevelt?

Nope! Every nation in British Empire joined because they wanted they're dinner. Fact.

@@Darren-fm3pewhy are so many people of all backgrounds clambering over each other to get into Britain 🇬🇧?? 🧐

@@P.H.888 To take it over😂

To get there stolen wealth back

Too fn bad.

Really great comment for a more balanced and less sensationalistic perspective!

would you say the same about Hitler

@@arunjetli7909 would you?

@@PhillipHilton no i eould not and neither eould i say anything positive about Churchill he was an accidental prime minister intellectually snd ethically challenged

i meant would sorry for the typo

But why does that really change anything? The point is the privileged layer of the working class ultimately sold out the working class as a whole

​@@Left_it That was especially true with Thatcherite policies. Divide and rule, always a good tactic for the ruling class.

Nothing has changed. Capitalism only comes to kill, steal, and destroy, yet workers keep themselves enslaved too it. They’ll die for it. That’s some damn good brainwashing.

History will look back on us just as unkindly. The moral goalposts are a moving target and we will be judged to have missed it just as much as anyone else.

@@dogboy5398 You must be off your rocker, you twit lol. The guy stood up and fought against racism and oppression, in his own land, and you label him a murderer?? Anyway, it's a marvellous idea to rename it Mandela Town so I'll credit you with that lol.

Black children everywhere are only presented with flattering views of Churchill and other historical figures while our own heroes are minimized. Thank God for the internet and social media. We can learn the truth.

​@@dogboy5398He is absolutely 100% a hero!

@@dogboy5398 Well, the entire world sees and recognizes him as a hero except you 😂😂

Wow this was never taught in history class in fact the opposite. Portrayed as a charismatic leader who was loved by all.

​@@rosem5041Maybe it's BS.

90% sure that moment you are talking about is the Siege of Sidney in which two armed gun men were in there apartment that was on fire (more than likly set by the police themselves) after hours of shooting at the police, all the people in the apartment below them and in the sounding houses were all evacuated only the two gun men died in the fire one of them was shot in the head when he put his head out the window a few firemen died from clearing the builden after it was put out buy no others died in the fire

It "sticks out to you" but you never bothered to look it up, even before commenting. Good job!

@@apexpsycho666 Ask yourself, Why did the firemen risk their lives ? The trouble with official stories is how much gets covered up.

Excellent comment.

Yes, distorted history, but history. The sort of history that we shouldn’t repeat. Good example of what Japan was doing until this last year - forgetting it’s past and revisiting it with different eyes. Statues allow us to be disgusted every day to not forget the type of countries we have developed, ingrained in those figures and wars. It’s my opinion that we would probably forget the nasty past we have if we didn’t have those statues. Do most people know about this nasty past? No, but that’s where the type of stuff Tariq Ali is talking about is effective. Would be a great moment for our countries if we had, like the example he gave, the current plaque showing how we used to portray that person in the statue and another one showing how we now see that person. That would be very enlightening! It can’t forget that we need to, above all, learn about all these people from the past because nowadays new statues and monuments alike are being built for modern figures that are doing very similar things that the ones on old statues did…

I agree. It also depends on the reason for why those statues were put up. A lot of the confederate statues (you know, the guys who wanted to continue the practice of slavery) were put up a decent chunk of time after the civil war as a way of putting POC in their "place". If the statue was put up in such circumstances, then I think it should be taken down and those that say otherwise are only doing so because they support what those abborant people believe. Free speech can and is used as a shield for critisism. You can freely use your free speech to say racist things, and I can use mine to call you a racist. That isn't shutting down debate, that is describing your views my dude.

​@@Suddenly175Or, better idea, we remove the statues and improve our history curriculum.

If you want someone you do not get to select which part(s) of them you like and cast the rest off. Take people as a whole. Oliver Cromwell is the symbol of the Parliamentarians not just a symbol of himself. The people I mostly agree with from that era are Charles I and John Milton. Charles' trial was also a legal absurdity. Anyway, I am drifting off the point. Did not the LORD men of one mold? Well, we are apparently all descendants of Adam and Noah. Genesis 1:27 is not as obviously about human equality as I first thought. I think that the value of moral equality comes more from 'You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbour and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect' (Matthew 5:43-48). Why then should there be honour and respect to some men above others? Hierarchy means Holy Order. St Paul urged the Jews (Christianity is closer to the initial fulfillment of Biblical Judaism as well as not every Hebrew is a Jew and not every Jew is a Hebrew) in Rome to obey the civil authorities and to give honour to whom honour is due as God ordained the princes of this world (although I doubt this honour to whom honour is not just about Charles I et al). Israel had ordained kings and judges (earls by role if not earls by name). Early Israel had no kings, but was led by the Prophet Moses, Joshua, the Judges (Samson et al) and the kings (Saul, David, Solomon et al). The Levites were the highest ranking of the tribes being of the Priestly order and consequently being subject to moral purity as only Levites could perform the Holy duties in the temples. The Book of Leviticus is about the duties of Priests and laws for moral purity. The Prophets (people like Elijah and Isaiah) were higher (as Moses was to his brother Aaron - Exodus Seven) than the Levites. Prophet means Holy messenger - Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Nathan, Elijah, Isaiah, John the Baptist et al. Angels (Holy messengers from Heaven - St Michael, Gabriel et al), being heavenly spirits, are higher still. Then God the Holy Spirit, then God the Son, then God the Father. This is not God and everyone being on the same plain. That is simply absurd to suggest an Angel or a Prophet should be as low as even a king. In Anglicanism and Catholicism the saints are somewhere between clergy and Prophet. I suppose we are equal in the sense that we are all beneath God the Father, but we humans are still beneath and have local hierarchies within the larger hierarchy as the clergy have hierarchies (Pope, Cardinal, Archbishop etc) above that of the king who has his hierarchy (king, prince, duke, marquess, earl/count, viscount, baron, lord, baronet - a king makes a prince who makes a duke ad nauseum). Charity (or whatever the PC term for charity is - in the Abrahamic faiths, charity is really love: willing the good of the other as other given that is what the Hebrew word for love means), as shown by the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-34) is given and received by the individual, so just as Hester Biddle is asking what is to be done, one apt question is what are you doing, Hester? A lot of people complain about the state of the world and complain about other people, but forget Genesis 4:6-7. Biddle might well be doing something, but the only relief to the poor the king is expected to make is loans without interest to fellow Christians (for a Christian ruler, different for an Islamic or Jewish ruler). The rest of relief (say for someone who had a different faith or someone who had no faith) would be down to the individual to be the Good Samaritan rather than having Dennis Healy rates of taxation. The king could give money to whoever, but was not supposed to charge interest on loans to poor members of the congregation.

A very impressive man blessed with integrity and wisdom. I agree that, where it is warranted, statues should have two plaques and not knocked down although some times statue bashing can have unexpected consequences. In Victoria, BC, Canada a statue of Captain James Cook was knocked down by protesters. It didn't need much knocking because it was made of fibreglass. Many local people were appalled by the stinginesses of the city council that put it up.

This is the type of human that I can respect. Would love to meet him.

​@@peterreston6478 Literally a hero with fiberglass feet ... 😂

I am glad he is a lonely figure -he should leave here and take all his self hating followers and move somewhere that history suits him. Mars perhaps.

If he had strangled Bolshevism in its cradle Bolshevism wouldnt have genocided millions of Slavs in Ukraine (part of the Marx Engels plan was to genocide the Slavs, they wrote about it) without the communist genocide in Ukraine the Ukranians wouldn't be nazis and we wouldn't be facing world war 3 right now

we can have racist written under every statue and portrait - then they'll voluntarily remove them! 😅

Agreed. To piggy back, his solution is SUPER hopeful. People aren't walking around researching everything they see. Having a statue of a US president, then walking around the corner and seeing the status of his slave doesn't automatically cause someone to go out of their way to do research. I do agree with his take on cancel culture but I don't agree on the statue remark. Honestly, it's rare that I agree with putting up a statue in the first place.

The powers that be don't want change, worse still nor do most people. The majority of the public don't want to hear the truth, regardless of the subject, ignorance is bliss, how else does a white supremacist war criminal like Churchill end up being voted 'greatest Briton'?

Yaaaaay, Bang on the nail head, with a GIANT HAMMER.

Canada is an European settler state. Little wonder why Winston Churchill would be admired there.

wow, i am sure Cruela would like to deport him to Rwanda!

​@@Arltratlogrow up

The interview shews just how much he doesn't know or understand about historical events like the recurring famine in Bengal, which suits his narrative.

Which is what? Please elaborate.

He would be invited to Rwanda by Paul kagame. Kagame would agree with him.

Yes, His-Story

Tariq Ali couldnt lie straight in bed and im a RMT member

They teach lies in school they teach you what they want you to believe, it is indoctrination and programming, they did the same with Thatcher with the minors strike

Sorry but which lies about history do you feel you have been spoon fed? Do you think the UK is particularly egregious in the way it presents its history?

@@hastekulvaati9681 Well, the UK has done a corker of a job recently and now the government has 'bought' the papers, there are no holes barred on the lies they feed us.

"not a single English person....." not true

good comment

Indians = Racist to flood other continents 🙄

We need to apply and teach the historical critical method. We should see where the facts take us and not rely on myths, prejudices but rigorous scholarship.

The didn't literally build Britain tho did they 🙄

@@tom4381 yea they literally did. If you're up for it do a video chat I'll give you a free history lesson from the white folk's of this country. We'll start with the 45 trillion stolen and the cheap abused labour used to build literally everything in this country which continues to this day.

Remarkably and clearly against all modern intuition the people who "Literally built Britain" were the British ! I'm sure you'd be horrified to learn that outside of Western Europe most people in the world are racist to this day, though not sure that knowledge would do much to advance your political ideas. It's meaningless to use a modern value created to accomodate a changing population to try and measure historical figures. I could easily go after Nelson Mandela for not supporting Gay or Trans rights.

​@@tom4381Indirectly yes because the 43 Trillion the British Empire looted from India was used to build Britain. Churchill hated Indians!

Chrisum

In 50 years time we will measure Tariq agaibst the new modern moral standards and he too will be deemed evil and used as a pawn to engender an opposing ideology. Long lives the heros of hindsight !!

Churchill is not celebrated for his 'unpleasantness' and I think that's a key thing to remember.

It is the sort if thing taught at Eton I would have thought. The good stuff but gloss over the bad! Boris seemed to have racist views himself. Not good when running a country.

@@janetmalcolm6191 Boris? What's he got to do with it?

@@MrDamiansimor Churchill ran this country but with racist views didn't he?? Boris wanted to emulate Churchill. That is why I wrote that...Churchill was HIS idol.

@@MrDamiansimor also peoples unpleasantness is kept quiet.....otherwise they might not get to rule. Nobody sees that side of them at least at first.

Never knew that. Interesting. Got to know more of that

I feel also unhappy you are a Slum Dog with no pedigree. Know your place 🙈

He still didn't clear his club bills if I am right?

@@sudipshettynoojjis7851 Most probably yes,but not very sure.

As GHANDI lay dying by his body guards bullet, he was heard saying, " Churchill was right." India was not ready for Independence. Churchill tried to delay Independence for India. To PREVENT MASS MURDER HINDU AND MUSLIM CIVIL WAR.

Wrong Gandhi!! Brush up on history, mate.

Ghandi was also a racist. Statues are not the best way to remember people or adulate them. Some statues sit for centuries until activists find something that doesn’t fit in with changing society. Soon there will be new statues going up that future people will tear down. It’s a cycle. The Roman’s pulled down most statues of the Pharos and gods in Egypt. It’s life.

Great company since Gandhi was a racist too who supported castes and apartheid in South Africa

Why?

@@vm5954 because, for me, the purpose of an interview is to receive a response to a question in its entirety, and have the interviewer genuinely wait for the full answer. Oli did that here, and there was no ambiguity in the answers given by Mr Ali. Most interviewers are just waiting for their chance to jump back in and listen to the answer on playback, rather than being present.

Well as a lefty who had to run from his own country where they don't like left wing revolutionaries he's made a good living in Britain telling the natives what complete **** they were. I wonder what he could have achieved if he'd used his talents to bring democracy and human rights to his homeland Pakistan?

I fully believe the British atoning for their crimes is currently one of the few things that can save the current polity from descent into eternally worsening mismanagement.

I understand, an Irishman.

whataboutery.

The vast majority of nations have their share of racists and fascists. More love between nations is out of fashion but is a much needed quality if we are ever to achieve enlightenment and world peace!

gandhi didn't starve 10 million people to death out of racism; churchill did.

They sound like my parents. I remember the old man chasing one of the local racists down the street. After they'd had the temerity to knock on the door and try and co-opt him into chasing a South Asian family out of the village. He was incandescent!

That's not true Racism has always existed, yes, but not at the level of Europeans. You have to think that the British East India companies soldiers were in majority Indian, more than 90% & this had a lot to do with the Hindu cast system. Can you imagine a brown black empire coming to a European nation & the white majority fighting for them? Churchill was just as evil as Hitler.

@@capt.bart.roberts4975 Hah, nice. Yeah, my Grampa wasn't a neighbourhood watch kinda lad, but he just made sure he wasn't going to raise a bad person in his eyes. Tbf, they just always came out with very modern takes on things before they were considered good takes. His only bug bear was religion, but that's because he was raised Catholic (Irish mum), and the church was not good to his mum. Other than that...he basically was a live let live hippy...who's still a roll-up sleeves, boxing loving sailor xD.

@@lionroar26 That makes little sense. Churchill aside, (I need no convincing as to his downsides) you mentioned the caste system. This is just further proof that the wolves in any society need little persuasion to rule with an iron fist and that the roughly 70% of sheep will follow them over a cliff if it means they get left alone. History is littered with examples of this. Granted, Churchill lit the touch paper and the UK benefitted, but there were those in India just waiting for such an opportunity and proffitted a lot more than the lower classes in the UK.

Include Starling as well@@lionroar26

Brilliant? Please! That word has become too abused. Another boring safe underwhelming windy nothing if a long lecture. Hasn't changed in years. Waste of time. Yes Churchill is a lot like Hitles and Dulles. And?? Focus time on what matters today. Worse things in real time are upon us and this winbag doesn't explore THAT meaningfully either.

@@Madasin_Paine kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aJdzf5CC1rjLo2Q.html

​@@Madasin_Painehistory telling is always slow and boring but it's important to hear the other side of the story and not the only side. I presume you are not a big fan of the bashing the british image gets in this interview.

@@kurdaali Out of respect for the audience, the editor and speaker lack. Why on Earth would you presume so incorrect yet likely to appease your POV? Think and research first then asking obvious self serving questions will become unnecessary.

The far left are worse

Like Mark Corrigan.

Tariq Ali's books are Marxist drivel for the most part. But to really insult history they would need to be historic books first. Which is definitely not the case with them or other opinion pieces that cherry-pick and ignore Historic data.

Simon Heffer is an extreme right wing journalist, very similar to Sebastian Gorka in the US.

Or doctrine. Propaganda.

Tariq Ali lives in a parallel dimension. If Hitler had won over Churchill, there would be absolutely zero racial diversity in Britain.

Very cool and wise in your comments! We have to get away from the madness that is going on here and around the world in general. We must come to the realization that we are all one Human Family and that religion or ethnicity does not affect our lives or our humanity as a species!! Thank you for your openness! The world desperately needs people like you, to make us think, reflect on what is happening now! Blessings to you and your family 🙏

How is our country defeating the Nazis being “idealised”? Should we no longer be proud of this achievement? Did all of our ancestors who fought die in vein? They would be ashamed of your comment

Yes ..he's a mythology of the past ...a story book larger than our lives character as we cower in the bunkers.

@@dogboy5398 Don't be silly.

@@dogboy5398 Wow, look at all that murder lol

@@dogboy5398 Keep posting irrelevant whataboutism with no basis in reality 🤣

@@MissBlennerhassett876 he was heavily involved in the Church Street bombing.

@@stevenicol1 While he was in jail? lol

I agree - Tariq is evil

yes those very same proddies who've held Scotland (and N Ireland ) back for decades

He is a complete buffoon who never did an honest day's work in his life.

Well said and spot on.

Americans are raving ecstatically about 'Oppenheimer' who wasn't the leading physicist of the Manhattan Project but the coordinator of its highly secret programme. Not sure if the film even mentions the role of Enrico Fermi, Bohr, Heisenberg, Planck, Einstein in developing nuclear research.

Myself knowing so many crimes by our elite and their protection of reality I would be deeply skeptical about that and any film , the mainstream is purely propaganda for the masses , entertainment at best but will be far from the truth . For that reason I have no interest to watch .