Coffee and tea can be sugary, though. I wonder if they just asked if the participants drank "coffee" or if they divvied it out to what kind, how much sugar, how much caffeine, etc.

@@brandonkrause7308 probably

This screams of selection bias to me too. One has to be extremely careful with claims of causality without proper controls or experiments. Sadly this kind of shallow analysis is all too prevalent today:/

Also people who drink 3 cups of coffee a DAY are probably doing it because they NEED to, they are likely highly active people resulting in good health.

@@brandonkrause7308 Yeah ... five cups a day seemed really high to me too. I'm sure plenty of people do it but I mean, damn, that's a lot of coffee...

Me too. It's been over 6 months since my last one. That's a great idea, I'm going to start doing it

That is a great shout, I started smoking again a few months ago after a family tragedy and the peace away from people is important to me. It's hard to replace that solace.

I used to meditate a lot on break. Now I smoke. I detect two correlations between the two

Just being able to take a step outside is all you really need. If you can swing it.

I drink coffee and smoke… those two are like my work rituals, can’t work without em. I’ve been meaning to stop smoking because I think it’s taking a toll on my lung health but it’s just so hard to do.

@Bohdan M but everybody knows (and most of us expected from the get go) that you tube premium is a rip off which only puts money in the pocket of one of the most powerful corporations on Earth.

Agreed about clearly delineating content from ads, this totally wouldn't fly on TV in my country and as much as I love Adam I legit was rolling my eyes every time he dropped in the companies name. I just watched a seven minute advert on a platform I pay not to see ads on 😩

@MonsterCraft not everywhere. But yeah, they could piss off a few jurisdictions if they don't admit it somewhere. Often the "paid promotion" alert is buried such that the casual user could miss it. Especially in the past.

Adam is really good at turning an advertisement into an interesting video. Most other content creators just shove raid shadow legends near the start or end of their video lol.

Adam Ragusea is a rare breed. Seriously. The guy has standards and a moral compass that is unbreakable. Nobody's perfect, but in a world where E-girls are selling small containers of their bath water for 30$ a container, its great to have people like Adam around.

This needs to be higher up. It's exactly what I was thinking during the video (and then after having read the study). I watched the entire thing, because I enjoy Adam's content and am happy for him being endorsed, but the video is very one-sided, especially compared to his regular content

Unrelated, but is that an anarcho-trans flag?

Hygiene Factors shouldn't impact the effect of coffee, so the study could be proven.

This is the kind of comment Adam Ragusea would read and mull over for months before mentioning in in a future video.

The actual conclusions of the study don't matter when you're getting paid big bucks to make a clickbait video to shill for a coffee company lol This is the exact type of thing he'd mention in the video if Trade wasn't sponsoring the whole thing.

Yes! I really love learning about tea, but there's not nearly enough videos out there covering that sort of stuff.

@Sida Saloma If you don't have that sweet bean juice, I'm not interested.

He will do it once a sponsor will pay him to do talk about it🤣

@@FlorenceFox I'm sick of porno bots, they're everywhere!

Good lord i'd love it!!

I loved going to Ediya when I lived in Korea!

Exactly, it's similar to the studies showing that people who drink a glass of red wine every day tend to live longer. It's not because of the wine, it's because people who can afford wine every night also tend to be able to afford better healthcare and be in a financial position where they don't have to stress as much.

That's super interesting! But where I'm at in North America (Midwest, USA) even the older folks don't drink instant coffee. At least from what I've seen, it's extremely uncommon.

@Bohdan M if you want good affordable coffee in europe you can go to the netherlands. They import tonnes of sumatera and bali coffee every year but typical dutch they keep all the good things for themselves. the Japanese import another indonesian coffee called toraja coffee, they even invested a lot of money here.

@Bohdan M For some reason we do have too many brands and varieties of 3 in 1 type instant coffee mix in korea. Some are good, some aren’t. Super convenient for a quick cup. Most are quite sweet. Great for hiking and picnics. Most koreans are (theoretically) lactose intolerant, though in my case i can drink a cup of caffe latte without any issue (my brother can’t), but those instant mix usually comes with milk alternatives so a lot more people can enjoy them. Coffee-only instant coffee (powders or granules) normally comes in much bigger packages, for home use. 500g or in kgs. There are a few brands that sell individually made ones (kanu is my fav) but they aren’t cheap.

My old boss, a very nice but constantly stressed executive actuary, just kept a big thing of Folgers instant coffee under her desk. I worry for her sometimes.

More accurately, coffee drinkers are less likely to get various diseases.

There is the understood "less likely to die in a given timeframe" when talking about mortality.

@@pianoforte611 Yeah, I bet the study probably assumed that the reader would understand that the findings were directly connected to the time constraints within which the study took place. Just a hunch...

@@pianoforte611 but saying "Coffee drinkers are less likely to die" is not the same as "Coffee drinkers are less likely to die in a given timeframe".

@@JD-wu5pf Come on stay on topic and not go ad hominem

Just what i was saying... Well pretty much my point.... One of the problems i have with such reserches is just how many factors there are to account for... the idea that accounting for the sugars and other junk food people eat with their coffee is enought is insane... Becuse there's always another way.. another level of reasoning to add For example What if the kinds of people who drink coffe without sugar or cigarettes are the kinds of people who generally eat and live healthier... There are sooooo many factors and habits to consider What if the kinds of people that drink more cofee do so to wake up... becuee they're heavy sleeper/...love to sleep.... Which is extremly healthy... What if the people that drink more coffe correlates with more productivity aka make more emoney... (And we all knor the strong correlation of wealth and health...) And so on and on and on The point is that sure coffee could be beneficial but studies like that aren't perfect And it's good to consider everything If you want to live well snd grow old.. well then there are better alternatives such as for example snti oxident supplements... Turmeric fo give an example is an amazing spice with lots and lots and lots of heslth benefits... (But again there's sooo much to account for... The difference is that the effects are a lot more noricable quickly and most people don't consume all that much of the spice...)

It's probably the same as why vegans live longer than the avg person. There are other healthy behaviours that those type of people tend to have which allows them to live longer. Meanwhile the avg person don't pay much attention to their health.

Drinking coffee is generally more expensive habit than tea or water. It aslo not suitable for people with heart issues(even minor ones). There are plenty of other factors that seems more legitimate explanation than coffee is being good for health.

Honestly hearing that coffee drinkers live longer sounds like something that is probably related to economic reasons As you need to have the money to afford to buy coffee And people with more money tend to live longer I'd be really curious to see a study controlled for income levels

Coffee is obscenely cheap, what are people on about saying that only rich people drink it. People are acting like cancer deciding to back off if you have 5 digits in your bank account is more reasonable than antioxidants being helpful.

People need to be more like Robert, actually reading the study rather than the warrantless virtue signaling of op.

@@shadow13151 My comment already pointed out a few confounding socioeconomic factors. Health education, diet, free time, work stress, exercise, occupational health hazards, sleep, and healthcare access are all impacted by income level. These factors are all potentially confounded with each other as well; for example, it’s likely that someone working two jobs would lack the free time during work hours to go see their doctor about something, even if they could afford to. While it is true that the developed world has coffee available in practically every grocery store, it’s far from the cheapest thing on my shopping list. It’s not inconceivable that it would be one of the first things to go if I needed to cut down on the weekly food budget. Alternatively, since I (along with many other regular coffee drinkers) am physically addicted to caffeine, I might purchase more junk food or bulk carbs than healthy foods to offset the cost, or I might purchase caffeinated soda to replace the coffee. Both of these are cheaper and decidedly unhealthier. Not to mention, this video seems to encourage quite a large consumption of coffee daily, which means that to see the purported benefits, you’d have to be able to afford to go through your bags of coffee faster. The UK study points out that instant coffee has a significantly weaker correlation with longevity than non-instant coffee. They reason that instant coffee has less of the antioxidants and other beneficial chemicals, but they fail to account for the demographics of instant coffee drinkers vs. non-instant, with the former being more likely to be older and/or poorer. They also report that non-instant coffee drinkers are more likely to have a university degree, which _is_ causally linked to higher income. However, this study does not report how it attempts to account for income level, if at all. The Korean study simply breaks up its sample (people over 40) into three different income levels. While this is a good start, it is unlikely to encompass the relationships between all of the variables I mentioned above. Additionally, the study only looked at the incidence of types of cancers - the result is a correlation between coffee consumption and decreased incidence of only a few types of cancers. They specifically say that they cannot establish a causal link based on their data. Furthermore, it’s improper to draw the conclusion “coffee makes you live longer” from a study that shows a slight preventative effect against just five types of cancer. My point to all of this is *not* that coffee is bad or classist or whatever. My point is that this video does not hold up to Adam’s usual standard of care given to scientific study. He might call it “journalistic integrity.” The conclusions you can and cannot draw from published data are usually quite nuanced, which is why we have the entire framework of statistics. It is, like, _the_ cardinal sin of statistics to equate correlation with causation, and in reading the studies, you should have seen that none of the language in any of them establishes a causal link between coffee consumption and longevity. The reality of the coffee-longevity link is probably a result of all of the factors mentioned in all of the studies, plus countless others that nobody has accounted for in their analysis yet. Such is the problem with studying something as vague as “longevity” - there’s so many different factors that go into everybody’s daily lives that it’s simply impossible to understand the cumulative health effects of everything we do. I’m curious about what was cleared up for you when you read the studies. Close reading of both the Korean and the UK studies doesn’t really support Adam’s conclusion here.

@@DracoOmnia I did read the studies. Could you tell me, based on the studies and their conclusions, which part of my comment is “warrantless virtue signaling?”

@@shadow13151 None of the studies establish causation. Read my whole comment for details; I’m not going to type it all out again.

@@shadow13151 he didn’t read the study but his ego tells him to comment anyway

12 cups a day?! Bloody hell, how are your hands not shaking like a Parkinson's patient?!

May I know what's the name of the James Hoffman's video?

@@itikuekuek I think it's the coffee and blood sugar vid, can't remember the title though

@@itikuekuek here is the link kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i55zfcJ1qMuldI0.html

@@jeffreyau9751 part of it is decaf, usually it's max 8 cups of regular coffee per day

bro I live in Serbia, make like 500 € a month and drink like 8 cups a day

@@lilveacky baahhahaha

@@castle467 coffee is cheap here tho

Yeah, I was thinking the same.

I've known a lot of poor folk, and I've never known someone too poor to drink coffee. It's pretty close to the start of the "basic needs" list for a LOT of people in all different classes.

shhh soon they will say drink coffee to make more money

This is my assumption as well but Id need to read the paper

This was also my understanding of it.

The adjust for income in the paper. It's pretty standard to adjust for income, sex, BMI, smoking status, drug use etc. in retrospective analyses like this.

In the first study he linked, it was accounted for.

Funny how nobody can remember anything like this during cold and flu season.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pMiohJenstmxp5s.html Yes...

Tbh most of his videos feel better slightly faster. My short attention span can't hand his meandering voice.

Great suggestion! I turned it down to 1.75x but adam was quite watchable at that speed in this particular video lmfao.😆

Using sponsorblock a bunch of this video was flagged.

Only if you don't drink enough, now get to drinking!

But the study was for chance to die of people over 40, over a period of 10years. Which is not 100%

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pMiohJenstmxp5s.html Yes...

@@SenorBigDong69 the joke police have arrived

Best comment ever

Was what you were told specifically vitamins/minerals? If so that would be interesting to learn, but we do know that humans can differentiate hunger/thirst. So I wonder if this can be broken down along the lines of how our body tells this to out brain?

@@brushnit9212 I've heard that it's cravings for certain foods specifically because they're rich in a certain vitamin or mineral. One of the better studied examples is people that are iron deficient getting cravings for dirt. The cravings go away once the deficiency is fixed. On the other hand, where I first heard this idea was from the account of a person stranded at sea. He mentioned it while talking about how he got a craving for fish eyeballs even though the idea disgusted him but he later learned that they he was deficient in at the time. What made me skeptical of his account is how his body would know that fish eyes had the exact nutrient he needed since it wasn't something he had eaten before.

I've heard that the stereotype of women craving chocolate on their periods is because chocolate is rich in magnesium and other minerals. Menstruating women become deficient in these minerals and thus crave chocolate.

Yeah, like geophagy in pregnant women.

Pink salt definitely tastes better the more dehydrated I am.

Unfortunately, there's still a never ending pool of potential bias in science. The comments are absolutely right to be skeptical, since most published studies are ultimately wrong.

@@puppieslovies where do we draw the line then?

@@JackGames212 it's a hard call. When we have fewer incentives for bias, and we can rule out enough factors that we think we're right at least most of the time, I'd say it's good enough Currently about 80% of published research is estimated to find false positives because of bias, so let's get that down to below 50%

@Fone dude said caffeine addiction not porn addiction

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pMiohJenstmxp5s.html Yes...

So thankful for antioxidants

Exactly, all though I drink it with sugar and cream😔😔

what a legend

Anecdotal evidence is no evidence.

my grandmother lived to be 98 and never drank coffee or tea :)

@@Lisa25219 Good for her. And I hope you experienced her love for those many years!

@@Lisa25219 Just think -- SHE COULD HAVE MADE IT ANOTHER 4 YEARS, JUST BY DRINKING COFFEE ALONE.

This is one of the most well documented correlations on the planet. The reason its so easy to say is because there's so much overwhelming evidence for it. Honestly I'm surprised anyone hasn't heard of this.

I agree with you. The moment he said "a small minority of studies" disagreed and started giving conjecture about what could have gone wrong, I got skeptical. If you like coffee and agree with the positive studies, fine, but you should look at them as rigorously as you easily dismiss the negative ones.

I agree with your comment, but I also feel like this is really not representative of Adam’s usual content. I’ve always gotten a sincere vibe of integrity, care, and intellectual rigor behind his videos, even his prior ads. This video’s departure from those values makes me believe that maybe Trade pushed him to make some misleading claims or otherwise wouldn’t approve of a script with appropriate qualifying statements. Pure speculation on my end, but I’ve watched a lot of this guy’s videos and was a touch disappointed by this one.

Issue is, if they didn’t control for smoking, the study is more or less worthless since we already know antioxidants seem to work negatively for smokers. In comparison, a study that controlled for most factors and can rule out their possible effect on the results is much more reliable.

One of Adam’s first sentences in this video said it is an ad. So this video pretended nothing. If you drink coffee ONLY I hopes of lengthening your life, you are to be pitied. If you enjoy coffee, drink it, and then “long life” could be a “perq”.

@@gerriebell2128 yes, he said this is an ad. But he also said immediately after that because it's an ad, he can't say anything that isn't a "rock solid scientific claim" and this is definitely not rock solid.

If you watched the video, Adam notes that the benefits are seemingly due to compounds found within the coffee itself - decaffeinated coffee would have the same effects.

Did you miss the part where he said decaf provides the same antioxidant benefits

@@dc8836 What bothers me is the way he poses the whole video obviously just to make a whole video based on a sponsor… if you really care about the topic why not inform us of the best foods pertaining to antioxidants instead of this

I’m willing to bet that the studies Adam references for his conclusions state the theoretical framework in more depth and likely more technically than would be popular on KZfaq. Also, I’m biased because I work for Starbucks, so I guess I too am selling coffee 🤣

exactly, maybe the people who drink coffee/more coffee or more likely to for ex. have higher incomes

Yeah, studies have shown a correlation between light alcohol drinking and longevity but the cause is likely that light drinking is so pervasive in society that the group that abstains entirely from alcohol has a disproportionate number of people with underlying health concerns that motivate not drinking. A similar relationship is feasible for coffee, plenty of people are advised to avoid caffeine by their doctors. The anti-oxidant hypothesis is also something we should be skeptical of, largely because claims of anti-oxidant benefits are greatly overexaggerated and excess anti-oxidant consumption may actually increase instances of some cancers. Like most things in health the answer is never simple.

Many viewers in this comments section have theorized that daily coffee drinkers, for a variety of reasons, tend to be wealthier and enjoy a more comfortable standard of living than the average person. This is probably a pretty important factor in determining one’s lifespan. I’ve also seen people guess that caffeine helps people avoid preventable accidents by increasing one’s alertness, and another guess that the diuretic effect of coffee makes people pee out more sodium, which, when consumed in excess, is a risk factor for heart disease. There is probably a grain of truth to many of these theories, including the one Adam posits, but I think it would be really difficult to test every single hypothesis for this kind of thing - the different variables are just too entangled with one another.

It’s the antioxidants if you watched the video

PORN COLLECTION 👇 ▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE Megan: "Hotter" Hopi: "Sweeter" Joonie: "Cooler" Yoongi: "Butter Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy . Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım'' Erinder: ''Sezimdüü'' Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak'' Dene: ''Muzdak'' Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis. Aç köz arstan Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon. Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan. Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾 Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente 💗❤️💌💘💟

We don't have creamer here in the UK, we just add milk.

Electric Kettles are super simple devices. I doubt there is much to review honestly.

@@EarthB00 Electric kettles, or regular kettles, are very important for pour over coffee. The spout makes a big difference to flow rate and the like, and having things like temperature control is pretty nice.

I have seen Americans who boil water in a microwave....... disgusting.

@@burhanbudak6041 I have an electric kettle, but I have to ask.. why does it matter? hot water is hot water

@@oxybrightdark8765 needs a good boil and you get some of the iron from the kettle. I can't think of anywhere in the world where microwave water is accepted. Have you seen the american tea viral video?

I've heard that in the US, kettles take quite a lot longer to boil than the UK, because of something to do with power usage limits. So I think part of the reason it isn't so common is that it's not a whole lot faster in a kettle than on the stove. It still seems strange not to have one though. Especially when US houses are generally so much larger that they aren't as concerned with saving counter space.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pMiohJenstmxp5s.html Yes...

@@thegrinderman1090 The main reason people in the US don't own as many kettles is that few in the US drink real tea. Most tea consumed in the us is sweet tea which is usually sold pre-made in bottles. Coffee is by far the more popular choice in the country, and is usually made through a drip pot.

@@Katrik3571 I don't drink tea either, and only drink 3 or 4 cups of coffee a week (kettle into aeropress), but I still use a kettle at least once a day. Boiling water for cooking pasta or rice mainly - which is going to be cooked in a pan on the stove anyway, but it's much faster to use the kettle for the initial boil. Other members of the household, none of whom drink much tea, also use the kettle several times a day. You save probably 4 minutes for 1 litre boiled in comparison to a pan. That 4 minutes once a day, multiplied for a year, you've saved an entire 24 hours for a small device which cost £15. And you save on energy costs too. Imagine how it is for households who all drink 6 cups of tea a day...

Most Americans do not make coffee like that, drip or cup maker is the standard.

I think it's two sides of the same coin. The water-soluble compounds will leach out of the beans but the compounds in the water will also diffuse into the beans. The end result is and equilibrium where the flavours lost are replaced by the ones diffusing into the beans.

Yeah I wasn't a fan of the pitch of this being a health advertisement. That said I checked out the website he advertised and rather than doing their subscription service I just bought a coffee it recommended for me lol

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pMiohJenstmxp5s.html Yes...

Nope the Devs will Nerf Coffee and Tea the next life update so that we can't live longer and by Devs I mean God

@Fone bruh

please more tears

Classic correlation is not causation.

Erik, you said it perfectly! Socioeconomic disparities obviously have an impact among other factors which is why topics like this are infuriating when they are simplified bc they are not so easy.

They do adjust for income: "Crude and adjusted models (adjusted for age, sex, income group, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, stroke, ischemic heart disease histories, nutritional intake (total calories, protein, fat, and carbohydrate intake), and coffee consumption or physical exercise) were used".

They do. Try reading it before you make your little knee jerk comment.

you really need to take time out of your gated community to see what the actual socio-economical issues of poor people are lol, coffee is COVERED under fucking food subsidies in most 1st world countries, but im glad you can use my situation to posture

I’m with you pal, our hatred of coffee unites us! If you still need a caffeine kick try loose leaf teas like gunpowder tea(the rolled leave pellets resemble black powder no gunpowder is actually used) the tea itself is pretty tasty with a little bit of sugar or use honey. Or try a nice black tea like chai.

If I have to face my mornings uncaffeinated, I don't really want to live all that long.

Nothing can beat Trade™ coffee. I suggest you throw all the tea you have and get some Trade™ coffee. White you're at it, also get some Ritual™ vitamins.

Are you talking about caffeinated? Because, as the video stated, you get the same benefits from decaf. At 2 mg vs. 95 mg of caffeine per cup, I'm sure it won't exacerbate heart, stomach, and blood pressure issues.

Well i mena 5 is nothing... When i was a bit younger... In my teenage years that is I nearly "od'd" on coffe.... I mean Ever since i remeber my self i had insomnia and heslth issues Sleep issues.... So not the bezt example... But 4+ cups of string coffe in a hour wss nothing

Say it louder!

There are also foods that we find to be healthy, and end up actually just being healthy. It's best to look at the scientific literature and not just "what people say."

Yeah and they say water is also healthy but drink enough glasses and you'll go bye bye.

Not really. The food science behind those three things is fairly well established in favor of them being healthy. The reason things like that happen is because, like Adam said, a minority of studies with poor controls get published, and then news networks pick it up because they know it'll get clicks. This is why it's important for people to look at the actual literature on something as opposed to whatever their favorite news source says.

@@Thuazabi I will say though that if you do not know the field very well, interpreting the findings might not always be feasible. Sometimes you need to understand the findings in the context of the field. My field of study is math and linguistics, so when a new study comes out I can understand the context and what the findings imply and mean, but if I were to read a nutrition paper, I might misinterpret. I do think there's value in science being abstracted to something someone can apply into their own life (for nutrition at least), but of course there are many potential problems there too, considering as it stands the education system doesn't do a good job of explaining academia, hence the anti-intellectual movement currently in the US. I'm just glad I know a good amount of people that cover a good variety of fields, so I can always ask for their unbiased opinion.

Also insanely useful when cooking pasta, don't have to wait for water to boil on the job when you can just do it in the kettle. I've heard it saves money? That's what my dad told me but I'm ready to hear that's not true lmao

You could make the same argument for cigarettes, but we all know smokers don't live longer

..so in a way, the internet is healty for you! Because people who can get access to internet can definately get access to better healthcare.. alright

Yeh, would be interesting to see the income of those who participated in the trial to see if there’s a correlation or a causation

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pMiohJenstmxp5s.html Yes...

Baseless

Sleeping less than 8 hours per night is proven to increase risk of cardiovascular disease, stress, Alzheimer’s, concentration, memory and a whole host of other pretty bad things :( Take a look into the research - or there’s a great popular best selling research book on the topic. “why we sleep”. Black Coffee is great for you as long as your not in taking the coffee past around 4pm - then it starts to affect sleep (sleep quality too).

@@themadmage924 plus your effectiveness and quality of life is diminished if you skimp on sleep. If you went from sleeping 8 hours a night to only 4, your days are "25% longer." And if your life is only 75% as long as a result, that means you die at 55 instead of 74. And all lives are not the same. Diminished sleep is associated with health problems, so you might think "ah the years from 55 to 74 suck anyway," if you short yourself on sleep, the "poor health years" just get shifted to before you die.

this guy marxes

no we should not

Its defense mechanism backfired big time

PORN COLLECTION 👇 ▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE Megan: "Hotter" Hopi: "Sweeter" Joonie: "Cooler" Yoongi: "Butter Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy . Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım'' Erinder: ''Sezimdüü'' Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak'' Dene: ''Muzdak'' Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis. Aç köz arstan Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon. Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan. Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾 Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente 💗❤️💌💘💟

So is the hotness of spice and the coolness of mint. That’s the stupidest reasoning I’ve ever heard.

@@stephi7260 Not forgetting garlic

@@stephi7260 The joke is that it was *intended* as a defense mechanism. Key word, intended. As you can see by how much we use mint, coffee, and spicy stuff, it backfired in a way, as they all ended up being desirable to a group of hairless apes. Though overall a positive actually, since we actively grow and protect all those plants. A lot. So the defense mechanism failed at its intended purpose (the joke being made by Emircan), AKA keeping things from eating the seeds and such, but then it looped around to failing so hard, us hairless apes started growing a ton of those plants.

Yeah there is not nearly enough criticism over this video. I think it's pretty easy to see how this video manipulates the science to sell product. Kinda scummy ngl

Tell that to 90% of Dunkin’ Donuts customers.

you are very confident XD

hmm seems to make sense, but that only qualifies if they compared wealthy coffee drinkers to poor non cofee drinkers. i would never want to drink 3 cups of coffee let alone 1.

Lol, I saw that there was an answer to your comment and really wanted to see whether someone found what you were looking for or not. And then it was just a bot. KZfaq in a nutshell.

@@bravado2809 I saw 2 replies to his comment and really wanted to see whether someone found what he was looking for or not. And then it was just a bot and a guy talking about the bot. KZfaq in a nutshell.

@@daroaminggnome The Korean study from 2021 linked in the description didn't draw any conclusion about tea, didn't survey on tea and wasn't containing information about tea consumption or any effects of it at all, only coffee. Among the references of this study were other (including Korean/Asian) studies/surveys/analyses (5 to be exact, dates ranging from 2018 - 2021) that were about both tea and coffee. If you want to read more, please open the first link in the description, press Ctrl+F to search the sites content and type in "tea". Then you can read through one of the multiple sources that was kindly linked for each of these 5 references below their research.

@@bravado2809 Ah, I didn’t look at the sources, great point, thanks!

@ethereal ? Clowned myself because I was looking through the study itself, since Adam said it dealt with both tea and coffee? Guess I should have assumed the study he said dealt with tea had nothing to do with tea.

Trade doesn't sell tea

Probably would, but as he said literally at the very start of the video, it's an ad for Trade coffee. If they sold tea, I'm sure he'd mention that. But it's also important to note that the studies he references are about coffee, not tea.

He did mention that tea is associated with the same benefits as coffee. As he just before that talked about how antioxidants play a part in it, most normal people would automatically assume that tea has those same components that bring the similar benefits.

Video wasn't sponsored by a tea vendor though.

This isn't a tea video. You could have remembered that.

Most studies try to account for income and lifestyle biases

the study linked accounts for income already, and coffee is relatively cheap as well, most people can afford coffee (made themselves, not from a coffee shop) unless they are complelty destitute

Exactly

Also, we have something to look forward to right away as we wake up.

Thats the whole point, people often don't drink coffee and will die sooner for the same reason - being poor )

@@Acid31337 haha I guess, I’m currently also quite poor. But i just love coffe, so I would rather spend 50€ a month on coffee than 50€ on medical bills

170 is cheap in the coffee enthusiast world?? i knew i was just sucking down caffeine compared to the serious people, but fuck me that's more than half of my kitchen tools combined

@@jakeb6703 Yeah, the deeper you get into coffee the deeper the hole in your wallet gets... $100-$500 grinders would be considered entry-level for enthusiasts, but a good endgame pick for most people. Good high-end grinders for enthusiasts these days could start at as low as $500 but can go up to the thousands...

@@jakeb6703 You could go for a hand grinder like the timemore c2 which is about $50, pretty much the minimum amount of money you need to spend to get a "good" burr grinder.

Get a moccamaster as well. Best machine I ever bought.

It doesn’t say anything about caffeine

Should probably watch the video before commenting, friend. Adam mentions that the studies he's referencing indicate that the effects aren't related to caffeine - you get the same results from decaf. The effects appear to be from chemical compounds in the coffee itself. It's not due to the caffeine. If anything, excess caffeine consumption is likely linked to negative outcomes. There's nothing wrong with a small amount of caffeine, even consumed habitually, but modern westerners probably consume far too much. But how else are we supposed to remain effective when we're worked too many hours for too many days?

then I could simply drink a lot of water

@@franciscofigari6171 could do that too. Should probably do that. These studies are usually comparing non-coffee drinkers to coffee drinkers. So the unanswered question is what are these people drinking instead of coffee? Usually nothing. Or something else other than water. I.e. Coke, sprite, vitamin water, tea, juice etc. Nothing wrong with tea but considering how often people brew tea. They are not drinking their recommended 3liters per day via tea. Fact is that most people are also chronically dehydrated. So please prioritise drinking water before coffee or anything else.

Might be an ad, but the cited sources are real.

they did control for income in the study linked, and I'm Dominican and back home literally everyone drinks coffee, now DR isn't a third world country (at least not anymore) but even very poor people still drink coffee everyday, it's just that affordable, it's basically nearly as important as food and water. I think people who have this idea about coffee being expensive are thinking that people are going out and buying coffee at coffee shops or something, when that's just not the case in a lot of places, they just buy ground coffee in bulk and make it themselves.

If you check the description, you’ll see the top study did control for those factors. The poorest people I know are the heaviest coffee drinkers, the richest never drink a cup. If you’re poor, working long hours to get by, you’re much more likely to be drinking 5 cups of coffee a day than someone who’s living the easy life. I can get a several month supply of cheap instant coffee that doesn’t require any machines for less than $5. Food stamps and the like cover coffee as well.

Source? Multiple things can be healthy.

Adam claims in the video that decaf coffee also has the same benefit as the caffeinated variety. I would contend that if you want the proposed benefits without the coffee you could either get your antioxidants from other sources or find another 15 minute activity you really enjoy.

Decaf coffee should provide all the same antioxidants. Also consider other sources like green tea for drinks, or just many vegetables that contain antioxidants. One thing to consider though, is that antioxidants have shown negative effects for smokers, or people with a history of smoking, so best to avoid if that applies to you.

It's complete bullshit. Some teas have more antioxidants. Don't get a caffeine addiction my friends all need coffee to function i can function just fine.

I can’t even begin to imagine how there are people that drink 5+ cups, do they just get used to it like a drug, dependent on it?

@@swiggityswoogity8085 It is literally a drug, so yes, eventually people don't even feel it but still need it to function like normal.

Consuming less than 400mg of caffeine/day won't make you feel anxious or any of the bad effects. Caffeine in safe amounts is good. It just depends on your tolerance, I guess. Maybe give coffee another shot, but in small amounts, and see how your body would react to it.

I’m in the exact opposite camp, I can literally down 4 cups of coffee and go to sleep 30 minutes later, does nothing for me.

Same sentiment here; he pushed the advertising well over a handful of times throughout an equal greater-than-a-handful amount of minutes. Plus, the antioxidant approach is something that the USDA, for example, has removed a database for, citing: "...mounting evidence that the values indicating antioxidant capacity have no relevance to the effects of specific bioactive compounds, including polyphenols on human health…[antioxidant] values are routinely misused by food and dietary supplement manufacturing companies to promote their products and by consumers to guide their food and dietary supplement choices."