Open your borders. Let young women n men flood in until White man is demea to 34% Then cause whity..only drops 1.4 kids, ( compared to migran).. repro rate 400%.. Gotz uz

Paulus was one of the generals who had to give up power after 1 week n get it back the next week, it made no progress.Get rid of the generals changing power every other week, that killed us n so many mercenaries turned on us

Rejoin with East. Better to keep Rome in Roman empire than lose whole west. But people like Ricimer would never allow that.

Complete overhaul, maybe a reversal to the societal collapse it experienced just before it well and truly collapsed geopolitically.

Roman empire fell due to wrong economic policy, corruption and greedy struggle for power among the wealthy caste. In it´s final few years, it was much too late to rescue the empire by some simple advises which could be easily fulfilled in short time. So my advise would have been: Run!

Absolutely nice joke. 😂

But the reason now is the islam.

​@@GARTENPARADIES-SACHSEN I don't get it

​@@GARTENPARADIES-SACHSEN the one who replaced other, will be replaced with another

​ @GARTENPARADIES-SACHSEN But at least if the Germans convert to Islam they get married a making alot of kids I know a white German man Muslim convert married a white German women convert and got 8 kids and he love and respect his wife so much and the same About her imagine if this German man his atheist and his wife she is a feminist they will never get married and they will never have kids Islam is allways the solution if you want the white Europeans make alot of kids with out Islam the white Europeans will get Extinction by red pill and feminism and lgbtq and atheism and liberal

Germanic Tribes: What did you say

Germanic tribes: and I took that personally

Yeah. Germanicus begged to Tiberius “One more campaign, they are weak, it would the very last attack, germania will be subjugated and tamed” Tiberius: No! I want germans to invade us one day!

Augustus was so smart in so many ways. He did a lot of things right. But he messed up his succession. Tiberius was a weird guy who governed like a weird guy. A pretty bad emperor all around.

@@davidwarburton2915 To be fair, Livia forced him to name Tiberius as his sucessor. Also, compared to Caligula and Nero, Tiberius was pretty decent

Quote from Trumpinius? 😀

@@oneshothunter9877 Trumpinius Maximus BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF MAXIMI!

So did Rome fall or not?

@@argylemanni280 they wouldn't have fallen if orangey was around :(

​@@mustafabarzanji9280They would have fallen even faster 😂

How much of a temperature drop?

The Huns did not use the stirrup - neither grave finds nor Roman writings show any. It's not until the Avars came in the late 500's that the stirrup arrived in Europe, after the Western half of the Roman Empire fell.

@@pbh81 Enough to make Scandinavia suck to live in That was likely the motivation for the Goths to move to what is now Poland

@@pbh81enormous. Ostia Antica, the port city of Ancient Rome is nowadays 4km inland.

yea the area of modern day spain, portugal, france, italy had around 30 million

did he say western specifically because he could have meant the entire empire

scholars generally accept the entire population of the empire never exceeded 75 million. So the Western half probably had 30-40 million. 120 million is 100% impossible.

i'm pretty sure they meant the whole Roman empire. so from Hadrian's wall to North Africa and from Morocco to Irak. and for all those territories 120 million sounds plausible.

@ChristiaanHW the world population at the time was around 180-200 million. China had 60-80 million at this time. So if Rome had 120 million then there would have to be almost nobody outside of Rome and China, which we know can't be true, seeing as India alone also had a very large population. Thus Rome couldn't have 120 million. Most academics say 75 million max.

Came to say the same

They had had waning populations for several generations

Mr Obvious CHINQ HAS LESS LAND AT THE TIME COMPARED TO GREAT ROMAN EMPIRE 😂

The Huns likely entered Western Asia shortly before 370, from Central Asia: they first conquered the Goths and the Alans, pushing a number of tribes to seek refuge within the Roman Empire. In the following years, the Huns conquered most of the Germanic and Scythian tribes outside of the borders of the Roman Empire.

@@TheLionFarmtotal bs. Never made it past the elbe, or to scandinavia

Especially after the Huns rode in and screamed “what up b*tches!?!?”

Wrong, this doesn’t explain why norse tribes came from scandinavia to southern europe, it can’t be the huns.

KZfaq historians are funny

I was curious and asked chatgpt, he answered that Han Dynasty exerted military pressure on the Xiongnu and the Xiongnu onto the Huns. Interesting.

They weren't running away from anything Xiongnu-Han wars had ended long before the migration period and Huns already had their own polity near the Altai that is the kingdom of Yueban

​@@nenenindonuThe Uighurs are allies of the Han Dynasty: they are free real estate 😂😂😂😂

Germany today is like Rome short before it´s fall.

@@martinkupka3575 EU

Imagine if Germany stopped using telex and telefax machines. 😀

@@martinkupka3575 It already Fell / The HRE broke up in the 1600s .

@@jaimendaniel5578 Thanks

yeah and half of them were slaves.. think about that. no one had to do any work,, well except for the slaves obviously.

40 millions people at it's best.

Better governed and more human and Christian.

​@@jaimendaniel5578ew

The greeks will not like this comment

Then the former Western Roman Empire got its revenge during the 4th Crusade, which permanently crippled the Eastern Empire, thus enabling the Ottoman conquest in 1453

It's really hard for know precisely. It's estimated so.

You're right. The roman empire at its peak is estimated to have reached between 60 and 100 million people. That's the entirety of the empire. And some of the most populated regions were in the east (Egypt, Greece)

@@padinspi11 the area of modern day spain, portugal, france, italy had a population around 30 million at the time, compared to the modern day area of egypt, levant, anatolia had almost 20 million people

Yeah he pulled that number out of his ass. Not even in Rome's golden age did the population reach anything near that

@@padinspi11 There was no Greece in that period...however, the most numerous peoples were the Thracians and the Illyrians

Market was saturated. They'd do better learning to repair elevators, but try getting a young person to want that!

@@YarPirates-vy7iv The odious Otis job?

It depends on how you define Germany. Some define it as a nation state, others as a cultural region or as a historical one. And even that differs among countries. The Germans themselves think of it differently than some others. They identify with the land far more than with the state, unlike the French for example. It is complex

​@@suchendnachwahrheit9143 Well in this context I agree with his comment, as Frisians we were part of those Germanic settlements but in no way were we part of 'Germany' till maybe the HRE.

@@TMTFT Sure. In the end Germany is a nation of nations and each component, each nation so to speak, such as Friesland, Bavaria, etc. is a solid amount older than Germany itself. But Germany is quite old as well. Thus, I do believe that Germany is the oldest or one of the country of Germanic heritage. Compared to the Scandinavian nations and the low countries as well as England, Germany did exist in a more modern way before the others did, which is why that assessment in his comment is a bit wrong. There was no unified nation state, but there was a Kaiser, there was a common Religion, as well as common laws and language, albeit with many regional differences. In 955 at the latest, the Germans also had a common identity against the East, namely the Magyars and the Slavs, who had been invading in the centuries prior. To me that seems earlier than what Scandinavia or the British Isles had. One should not underestimate the age of Germany. The history of Germany is simply quite different compared to other European nations.

There is a problem in the English language at this point: It uses the same name for the ancient peoples called germani by the Romans and the modern day peoples living in the Federal Republic of Germany. Other European languages don't have this problem, using different names for the current Germans (allemands, tedescos, etc) while they use the Roman name just for the old peoples (germain, germano, etc).

🤓

They needed to plant their wine somewhere warm...

Neeerd

​@@daylight3325Nerdy is good.

Even though its citizens would have called themselves Roman, Byzantium is not really considered as Rome due to major greek influence and differences in culture but also because of the different capital.

Still to this day not conquered but divided

A city cant be an empire. In the beginning the roman empire was called the roman repuplic. But dont surprise me you wanna take credit for that.

It is funny how the slavs that took over ended up being orthodox just like the Eastern Romans. What a coincidence.....

Thank you, I was looking for years for this kind of stuff

Me too

Oh Sh*t

Yeah, that is why i wanna be like conan.

A Spanish philosopher, Ortega y Gasset said that the fascination with culture and all things culture is a barbarian trait.

Sort of, Vikings were gently Norse Germanic. Tribes that remained in the North while the Germanic invaders were 400 years earlier.

@@germanshepherd2701 well some other 'tribes' tried to do the same en masse not quite a long time ago, using aerial means, if you know what i mean.

What did they call themselves?

@@Alsayid They had various tribal confederations. The Thurvingi were one of them.

The ancient Romans called them those and said it deprives from their native names which in the Gothic Language apparently meant “Western Goth” and “Eastern Goth” respectively. So what were those native names in the gothic language? Well those names are “Wistragutan” and “Austragutan” which sound similar anyways.

Haha so why are southern europeans poorer and want to migrate to northern europe?

Very important question. The forge of Europe in the Middle Ages owes a lot to the ideals and culture of the Germans.

Probably similar by that time most romans were non Italians anyway. When the Germanic tribes took over they sometimes did not change how things were run that much. Same language, religion and the roman aristocracy was mostly kept intact.

Yes bc/ad are christian terminology And BCE/CE is academic terminology for the educated people

@@Trickaz94 Thank you for the answer. What is the reason for CE to begin, I mean what happened and BCE ended and CE started 2024 years ago?

@@azazeln CE stands for common era, in other words when we started counting the years in the new calendar the romans introduced, BCE stands for before common era, before the new year count The christians use their own system which is basically the same but have given their own meaning to it, this was decided on with the Council of Nicea in 325 CE when the roman Catholic church tried to unify all christian cults and reform solely under the roman Catholic church

@@Trickaz94 Are you serious? The romans just happened to introduce a new calendar in the exact birth year of Jesus Christ? Stop spreading misinformation. The calendar we use today is the gregorian calendar based on Jesus Christs birth, and the atheists just want to use BCE and CE instead of the actual terminology which is BC and Anno Domini. Youre just straight up lying about the Council of Nicaea thing too, there was no roman catholic and eastern orthdoox church back then, there was one united insitution

@@Trickaz94 Please, get boosted. It is so necessary. You've been educated, you know the score. Believe in the science. The booster waits for you. You need it.

Because the heart land of the culture is Jutland, the Danish islands and Skåne. If you take a look at Beowulf and the locations of Nordic bronze age cult finds.

Sure, it could be a sort of heart land. Beowulf likely originating from the Geats(Götar) in what is nowadays Sweden. Yes, I know he traveled to the Danish King

Amen!

Not everyone believes the same book as you do, it is nonsensical to let some people's religion impact how we calculate time.

@@kryzzan7039 it’s not about a book. It’s about how we all measure time and that’s not gonna change. Making the words different doesn’t change the fact that it is all based on Jesus Christ and nomatter what you say , the proof is in the pudding

I have never heard before that the Slavs pushed anyone. It was always my understanding that it was the Huns who pushed the Germanic tribes, and when those tribes began moving west during the chaos of the Huns and the Roman Empire crumbling the Slavs filled the vacuum and settled the emptied lands. But that doesn't explain everything, because the Slavs also conquered some lands in the Balkans and further east. And I also don't know why we never heard about the Slavs during the time of the Huns. Many questions.

Blame the ancient Chinese for the Huns travelling west.

Steppe tribes usually migrate when they're being displaced from their land by another tribal confederation or when their steppe neighbours are weak and easy to conquer. The Alans on the Ponto-Caspian steppe were weaker than the Huns and were ripe for conquest

They were forced to move go the west by the Ancient Chinese during Han Dynasty that defeated the Huns back in late BC times and made them moved the West centuries later

Exactly.

Potentially, we don't know. The Romans called most of Netherlands above the Rhine Frisii, then there is a gap in the historical record and in 600 we speak of the Frisians. They are likely connected but nobody knows how. Frisians may have assimilated with the Anglo-Saxon migrants. One key element here is the lack of a Frisian kingdom in Britain.

It wouldn't have been sustainable, the roman empire had gotten too big for its own boots, especially with the inner turmoil that the christians caused in the later years of the empire

​@@Trickaz94You mean civil wars happen every minute, literally everyone wants to be an emperor 😂😂😂😂😂

How Western Roman Empire?

@@manjushagongale Huns are one of the oldest known ancestors of Turkic people. They split into Western Huns and Eastern Huns in Europe and Asia. Atilla led the western branch.

AD or anno domini by default.

More like 3 million to the east, thousand years later...

How so? The dynamics of warfare in our age is radically different from 400 AD, people from impoverished lands cannot just take a piece of metal and invade their rich neighbours, you need some very sophisticated technology, organization and military discipline in order to carry out such a feat which these impoverished people from africa or ME will never ever possess

@@b89976 They use our technology though, people from the Middle East, Africa and Asia are crazy for western technology. What do you mean they will never possess it, that's not the case. So word spreads easily now about where there are the best pickings, and how to shame locals into silence. They also play the long game, having many of their people working in our government departments now, both at local and national level. Plus they have a 5th column of - knowing or unknowing - traitors amongst the indigenous populations.

That is the correct term, deal with it

​@@Trickaz94No.

@@1685Violin go cry

Didnt they get defeated and driven out by the Arabs? The guy thought he was related to Hans, turns out it was Ahmed.

@@zjeee The achilles heel of the Visigoths was internecine strife. Still reconquest was led by Visigoth nobles and, to this day, Spain is the heir of a Visigothic kingdom,

“Visigoth” comes from the gothic name “Wistragutan” meaning “Western Goth” and and “Ostrogoth” comes from the gothic name “Austragutan” meaning “Eastern Goth”