Go watch "WTF Happened to Nuclear Energy?" here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h-CEmr1n0LWpfWw.html
@MichaelKubler-kublermdk Жыл бұрын
Firstly, I'll say that we should use the most appropriate energy source. Wind and Solar are generally the best, but not always available. Geothermal and Hydro are generally 2nd best options. Nuclear being the 3rd best option in my mind. Great for places like Korea, Japan and England which just don't have enough space and access to sunlight. But Nuclear is a finite fuel. Fossil Fuels are obviously the worst option... Yet until recently had been the default because of price. I think Nuclear power will be INCREDIBLY important when we start colonising other planets out beyond Mars. We just can't get enough sunlight very easily. Although my hope is that Nuclear Fusion will be online by then. Beyond the issue of Nuclear Fission being based on Uranium which is a finite fuel, my biggest worry is nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants going hand in hand, helping create the mining and refinement processes which can be used as part of the military industrial complex. At least, that's the major worry. Nuclear weapons are still a major existential threat to humanity. The fear of their use in Ukraine being an example of that. Radiation is also obviously an issue. The whole thing of people saying it's safe... Yet they had to remove the topsoil from a large area around Fukushima and displace a large number of people. If we replaced all Coal plants with Nuclear plants, and ended up having a Chernobyl like event every couple of years then the results would be disastrous. Next gen power plants are obviously a lot safer, but are still a while away. I'm grateful we seem to be somewhat leapfrogging newer fission designs for more fusion technology which has a lot more benefits (like no radiation if we have H3) and less downsides. The cleanup from nuclear weapons testing has been a massive job. Checkout the Nuclear weapons tests in rural Australia as an example. Living in Adelaide, South Australia we used to joke about the radiation having travelled across to us and made people a little different.
@@MichaelKubler-kublermdk”geothermal and hydro 2nd best” There is no new geothermal of any size. There is no new hydroelectric esp in Australia. Everybody in Australia knows that, so to reference it sounds like you want to pretend away the need for nuclear. “Not always” Solar hits full power average of 20% of the day over the year, less in winter. The rest of the time we all know it’s gas and coal at the present, again an apparent attempt to either pretend gas and coal use don’t matter, or to pretend away the need for nuclear. What are you on about?
@Fuz3j10 ай бұрын
Make your hyperlinks work or fire your producer.
@Sun4Ewa7 ай бұрын
And see Nuclear Now - well done!
@josemorales5117 Жыл бұрын
Back when I was a kid, nuclear energy was the future...
@hakooplayplay3212 Жыл бұрын
It is still
@juppertan Жыл бұрын
Then Tchernobyl happened and everyone freaked out.
@masonfarnsworth1801 Жыл бұрын
18.2% of energy in the US is nuclear.
@ClaytonBigsby01 Жыл бұрын
We have two nuclear power plants in Georgia that power most of the state.
@EthanDCash Жыл бұрын
@@juppertanwhat American people don’t realize though is that that disaster happened because of incompetence and low regulations set up by the communist party. The USA still does have some corruption, yes, but we are much less corrupt than the USSR was when the disaster happened
@totally_not_a_bot Жыл бұрын
My uncle designs safety systems for nuclear reactors. He said once that the hardest part is proving that they're safe. That pretty much sums it up. Because of Chernobyl, Three-Mile Island and Fukushima, as well as the Cold War, people don't believe nuclear is safe, and proving it is seriously hard. I feel like you'd need to live under a rock to have missed that.
@thomascretton8480 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear energy would be a great way to decarbonize our nations because it produces very little waste (including CO2). As you said, there was not so many incidents in 50 years, but yes it killed some people (and everytime there is an incident, we learn how to prevent those in other power plants, so it decreases the odds of incidents dramatically). I can assure you that the decarbonization of the society with nuclear energy will so many lives. Pollution kills so many people today or makes them ill, but people don't care, because it is hard to link pollution with a death (but scientists can). We also need to use less petrol and coal etc if we want to avoid many death and environmental disasters through climate change, and here again, nuclear is a non-carbon energy that could produce enough energy. Wind, water and the sun cannot provide enough energy alone and present other problems too. That's why nuclear might be interesting (if you believe in climate change and the rapid problems that are coming). Nuclear power kills less living beings (plants and animals included) than any other alternative for each kWh, even if we increase their quantity. We clearly tend to exaggerate the problems of nuclear, which exist, you are right, and greatly downplay the dangerousity and downsides of the alternatives that we work with. And it kills me, because I feel like we are shooting bullet in our own leg: it seems like the only option that rapidly decrease green gas effect, but we refuse to work with it because people saw on TV that's it's bad when you are too close to it
@Nill757 Жыл бұрын
Part of the reason “people don’t think nuclear is safe” is the misleading story about it. For example, Fukushima, nobody died from radiation. Big mess but nobody died. TMI nobody died. If the std is that nobody dies from modern day reactors is not enough, and “safer” is the only answer, then nuclear can never win. Oil gas coal can keep killing people via accidents and emissions everyday, and that’s life, but nuclear? Not safe.
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle5 ай бұрын
Crazy part was Fukushima took a effing tsunami to have any problems and even then, from what I read, it shut down using failsafe mechanisms the way it was supposed too, yet it is portrayed as this big disaster
@creestee08 Жыл бұрын
Didnt know Keira knightly is into nuclear stuff.
@harroldhenderson Жыл бұрын
Pretty sells!
@arghjayem Жыл бұрын
@@harroldhenderson I don’t know, pretty may get more views but I find it hard to take anything coming from someone as pretty as she or physics girl seriously! 😂 It’s like never trust a skinny cook, never believe a pretty face! 😂
@kurtsudheim825 Жыл бұрын
@@harroldhenderson tell me how so in writing?
@kurtsudheim825 Жыл бұрын
@@arghjayem she's not an actual physicist, she's a journalist, they find out did for us from smarter people
@beadmecreative9485 Жыл бұрын
@@arghjayemmisogynist … they have to be ugly in order for you to believe them 🤮
@Rijnswaand Жыл бұрын
And nobody is gonna look at the role of the fossil fuel industry in all of this, right? Right?
@lukegauci80158 ай бұрын
Good piont
@mc343 Жыл бұрын
Stupidity, greed, and immorality.
@masonfarnsworth1801 Жыл бұрын
I agree Johnny just goes for ckickbait and views to get a bigger sponsor payoff.
@chasejordan22 Жыл бұрын
Has nothing to do with all the cancer huh? Ever live near an atomic plant? Our local one shut down decades ago. Hundreds still work there dealing with waste. The local school had to close their building down and move miles away because of the highest rates of cancer in the state. Ive been offered a lot of money to work there, but I dont know a single person who has worked there and didnt get cancer. You think we can make magic energy from radioactive materials and there not be any consequences? Talk about stupidity....
@Dani_1012 Жыл бұрын
Also geography. Thinking about Fukushima I realised building a reactor practically on top of a fault line where tsunamis are common is not a good plan
@allergy5634 Жыл бұрын
@@Dani_1012Fukushima was an overhyped ‘catastrophe’ it killed a single individual and didn’t release that much nuclear radiation because of safety features. It happened because the company running it was corrupt and grossly mismanaged it
@boilol55156 ай бұрын
@@Dani_1012thank you kind stranger for that insight ( I might use it for my essay!)
@Nick-hi9gx Жыл бұрын
Long story short, people got BIG scared. Feels won. Feels are changing now as we kinda need cleaner energy. The answer is nuclear energy in places that are way, way the hell away from people, seismic activity, tidal waves, and Russian incompetence in every endeavor in Ukraine.
@tymondabrowski12 Жыл бұрын
If not forbthe fact Russia is there, Siberia would be actually a good place to do it.
@Nick-hi9gx Жыл бұрын
@@tymondabrowski12 As long as it is away from Kamchatka and the coast of the North Pacific there, yeah it would. Though the infrastructure required to then get the energy from Siberia, and to get workers and repairmen and stuff out tot he plants, might not be very feasible for awhile. 20-30 years may be a very different story though.
@linkkicksu8 ай бұрын
I feel like the Simpsons did irreparable damage to the public perception of nuclear waste, making them think it's some toxic glowing green sludge that gets pumped into rivers. No, that's what coal power plants do, just without the glowing part.
@satori9928 Жыл бұрын
Here in Italy we voted agaist nuclear energy... Twice. And now we pay twice the price for electricity from nuclear power plants made litteraly 30km away from our borders...
@frazansbaet Жыл бұрын
Awesome collab from two of my favorites, and on a topic near and dear to my heart.
@Supercharger86 Жыл бұрын
In europe Tjernobyl was a big contributer to the fear of nuclear power
@FacterinoCommenterino Жыл бұрын
Today's Fact: In 2021, a team of scientists created a 'living concrete' material, made with bacteria that can grow and heal cracks on their own.
@arsondude___ Жыл бұрын
Its a ancient roman cement mixture. Im pretty sure
@@arsondude___ no. We already discovered what that was that Romans developed to have their cement heal itself but it would not work today. Today we reinforce our concrete with metal and anciet Roman technique would corrode our metal
@ammaargotgame Жыл бұрын
@@ObliviouslyAware Moral of the story. Crack heals!
@SomeDumbRandomUser Жыл бұрын
this Video worked great. But i wonder whats about the economical problems. Stuff like: - Uran resource depletion - High cost of building the Plantation - cost of managing the waste (potentially forever) - Rivers and cooling running dry because of global warming in the future (like in france last year) i miss this information
@DrZhuBaJie Жыл бұрын
This is all one-sided pro nuclear. Paid?
@DamienWilpitzEDC Жыл бұрын
Yay!!! I love that Johnny & Cleo are teaming up!!! My two favorite KZfaq independent journalists!!! This is so good!🫶🏾🗞️☢️
@LilRofl Жыл бұрын
Reminiscent of Pandora's Promise which I really enjoyed. I look forward to a modern take on this 😊
@tufftimesbc Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@giorgos4574 Жыл бұрын
Just ask a university professor. Many reasons one is that it provides stable energy while the demand changes so you need to the energy and many other reasons ...
@yeezuschrist420 Жыл бұрын
Johnny harris collabing with cleo abram is a crossover i never thought i’d see.
@georgepapatheofilou6118 Жыл бұрын
They both did a good on their videos . Ain't easy involving word nuclear and coming up with positive video .
@darronpreston2098 Жыл бұрын
Perfectly possible to be positive about nuclear, especially looking at current and next gen.
@georgepapatheofilou6118 Жыл бұрын
@@darronpreston2098 Not half wrong. Feared it I did as a kid , way back when . Anyhow , have a good weekend
@timanaky9473 Жыл бұрын
I want to build nuclear reactor at my yard, but my neigbours werent happy about that.
@giorgos4574 Жыл бұрын
Just asking a university proffesor and getting the answer maybe its not so entertaining so i guess it will take a half and hour video of sauces and barber shop talk 😂
@bo1341 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear energy in a world where few individuals have so much power is dramatically scaring in so many ways. Perhaps it is still the future but not in the current phase of humanity.
@Ayd1th Жыл бұрын
what do you mean by phase of humanity?
@zedrhyx1788 Жыл бұрын
if we stop war maybe nuclear power is a mist but in today society war is still rampant and nuclear energy plant is one big target also nuclear energy is still dangerous even theirs a 1 percent chance it to fail like Chernobyl that one fail could destroy a city and deem in inhospitable to life for 50 years or more
@ante5544 Жыл бұрын
@@zedrhyx1788 History is a cycle and war is an eternal part of that cycle; it will never end.
@matthewmcclain1316 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, but that dynamic exists anyway. Now it's just oil producers that have that power. I get what you're saying, but whether it's nuclear or not makes no difference.
@bo1341 Жыл бұрын
@@matthewmcclain1316 that why renewable energy such as wind, solar and geothermal are better in my opinion. Renewable have to be spread out to be efficient and can’t depend on a precise location such as Oil or Uranium. In my view renewables have an opportunity to limit the power of few old man around the globe by limiting the influence of a strategic area that normally would fuels the world energy demands.
@Wolfeay Жыл бұрын
Seriously thought, are people un-ironically scared of nuclear?
@balmorrablue3130 Жыл бұрын
Yes they’re stupid
@tymondabrowski12 Жыл бұрын
Yes. Look at Chernobyl, normal people learned about it after the radioactive material went from Ukraine to Norway or Sweden. There are still parts of Europe in surprising places like Germany or some north countries where you can't gather mushrooms (which is a cultural thing to do) because the radioactive material fell down in that specific region. Lots of lives were altered and shortened (way more than the official number of casualties). And thing is, you can't really eliminate human error (not with current technology) or "freaky accidents", so whatever you do will at some point go wrong. And with nuclear the impact is bigger. Just looking at Chernobyl, some places there won't be hospitable for thousands of years. I'm not saying it's better to not do any nuclear or it's not worth the risk, but just explaining why people are afraid.
@chasejordan22 Жыл бұрын
Here in ohio our local atomic plant in Piketon has caused more cancer than anything I could ever think of. Whole schools have moved their building miles because the cancer rates were 4x the norm. Dont know a single person who worked there and didnt get cancer. But let me guess you dont live near an atomic plant huh? Dont have any experiance with them at all but you have some loud opinions huh? Makes since.
@invisalats841 Жыл бұрын
@chasejordan22 That's odd. That would mean the containment of the reactor was flawed. Did they ever fix it or just shut it down? Either that or they were dumping waste illegally.
@chasejordan22 Жыл бұрын
@@invisalats841 During its nearly 60 years of operation, the cleaning, maintenance and change-out of process equipment at the site generated radionuclide contamination, spent solvents and other chemical contaminants that were disposed of in onsite landfills and surface storage buildings. thats just from wikipedia. heres more A DOE air monitor adjacent to Zahn's Corner Middle School - which is located in Piketon, Ohio, just two miles (3.2 kilometers) from the plant - detected airborne Neptunium-237 and Americium-241 in 2017 and 2018, respectively. On May 13, 2019, a report by Dr. Michael Ketterer of Northern Arizona University indicated the presence of enriched uranium and transuranic radionuclides within the school, resulting in the Scioto Valley Local School District Board choosing to close the school for the rest of the 2018-2019 school year I litetally cant find a shut down date, or reason, but I dont see where anything was illegal or mismanaged.
@suspendedtwice4sayingrasis261 Жыл бұрын
I keep getting distracted by Cleo’s extreme levels of cuteness..
@drankFoD Жыл бұрын
She’s too fine to process what she’s saying
@LoftyBaghdadProject Жыл бұрын
Love the collaboration! Already followed both. Both are smart, articulate, clearly very well educated. Keep going, we need more of you!
@MaxwellNaradd Жыл бұрын
Natalie Portman does know science after all
@chan_for Жыл бұрын
answer: oil lobbies
@NarutoUzumaki-vc4wy Жыл бұрын
Wrong, the incentive is misplaced in his video he displays a chart that looks at government subsidies towards these sources of energy… Green energy companies got the most governments subsidies. That’s pretty good incentive.. I’ve also never understood the reason why lobbyists always lobby to ban something that gonna compete against them… like JUST GO IN THAT BUSINESS. Like when cigarette companies lobby against weed, like you have the infrastructure, just go into the weed business and release weed cigarettes.
@sheepketchup9059 Жыл бұрын
@@NarutoUzumaki-vc4wy wrong, it's just the oil lobbies
@alixante7437 Жыл бұрын
@@NarutoUzumaki-vc4wy Like if it was easy to use trillions in development of nuclear plants, for then having a low margin of cost. It's much better for them to just say its bad. Thye get a lot more money from that
@NarutoUzumaki-vc4wy Жыл бұрын
@@alixante7437 idk man, thats very short sighted.... Its a long term game, unless the point is they cant play a long term game, cause its obviously the future, why not get a headstart and corner the market before anyone gets there.
@alixante7437 Жыл бұрын
@@NarutoUzumaki-vc4wy because they will need to invest billions into a lot of things that will have a very long term few returns. It isn't good for them. And they aren't sure that they will succeed. So it's better to feed the already bad reputation of nuclear energy and they will keep getting a lot of money from oil, without spending that much
@divinity1079 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear is clearly the best energy source that we aren’t using enough of. Nuclear energy is safer, cheaper in the long run, and doesn’t pollute. The fear of nuclear is overblown or misplaced
@thegooseluci Жыл бұрын
I thought the fear was not nuclear energy but more the fear of the irreversible damages to ourselves and nature (…not that they’re separate) caused by natural disasters damaging nuclear reactors / plants
@lumina11511 ай бұрын
three huge reasons: it's non-renewable, it's expensive, and it's high-risk
@Authaire110 ай бұрын
Its really not high risk.
@SkydivingChiken10 ай бұрын
It is Extremely safe, 200 times more than oil
@Authaire110 ай бұрын
@@SkydivingChiken it saves the trees
@mavrospanayiotis8 ай бұрын
I can't explain why a bunch of people looking for the less expensive way to make us pay the most as possible for an energy bill doesn't invest they money in such a convenient and safe thing as nuclear energy without the certainty that they are not paying the money to build the plants and taking responsability for eventual safety problems.
@TheMarkster2459 ай бұрын
Number one answer: stigma
@ianheasman783Ай бұрын
Cleo,you look so much like Keira Knightly.Have just started watching Your nuclear video information,I'm sold on the idea of using the waste to get it used up.Makes sense,so why did they stop using it in the first place when they already had the means to use it.
@briandowers851 Жыл бұрын
Excellent tag team
@mr99percent10 ай бұрын
This is exciting
@lotgc Жыл бұрын
While we're at it, what happened to hydrogen power? That was a hit topic for a minute.
@2ndexplosivebullet11 ай бұрын
Vivek Ramaswamy. He’s breaks it down pretty well.
@amlesion9142 Жыл бұрын
This woman had no idea what happened in 2011 that resulted in the decline of Nuclear optimism shown on a graph.
@sheepketchup9059 Жыл бұрын
Why ignoring the man here?
@ante5544 Жыл бұрын
Neither do I. Could you please explain?
@amlesion9142 Жыл бұрын
Not sure why I'm not seeing my comment responses. But Fukushima happened in 2011 that impacted the Nuclear power industry as Johnny has shown to Cleo in the full video of this short.
@ante5544 Жыл бұрын
@@amlesion9142 Oh right, Fukushima.
@mifphilip Жыл бұрын
no one died from radiation at fukushima and the explosion in the power plant was due to hydrogen build up. and the area is safe today.
@mattmoses1877 Жыл бұрын
Fusion is the future
@pyotrberia9741 Жыл бұрын
From memory, safely dealing with nuclear waste and the potential danger of accidents was the main reason people did not want it. And that was when there was no viable alternative.
@DrZhuBaJie Жыл бұрын
The nuclear lobby has climbed back from its hole and corrupted a generation of KZfaqrs.
@thatrandomguy8567 Жыл бұрын
"Nuclear lobby" 😂 okay
@feuerwerkisttoll2935 Жыл бұрын
Yeah lets co continue to use Trumps green coal
@tishaak280010 ай бұрын
@@thatrandomguy8567usa is a corporate playground That's why we have regulations for workers with fair pay and not the mess of a car city in europe
@geroldy45469 ай бұрын
For real man how dare they discover nuclear is the safest energy source ever
@FuzDoesStuff8 ай бұрын
Better than spewing coal ash with radioactive particles into the atmosphere.
@xybety2 ай бұрын
Fallout lore
@a-j.2002 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear is not the future not because people are afraid but because the cost of building the plant makes it a bad investment. Renewable prices have gone down like crazy, they're safe and still improving in energy production and price. You don't need nuclear as base energy because enough renewables make it unnecessary. You will need quick, responsive, variable energy production and storage is the answer for that. For now, it's natural gas (though it's oil and coal in a lot of places). So, short answer is money. Today, it's a bad investment. In 30 years it's burning money away. Unless.... There's a breakthrough on fusion (so far, disappointing).
@elmojackson6621 Жыл бұрын
You are so uninformed, it is hard to even know where to start. You are embarrassing yourself. Just wanted to point that out, in case you are not just pretending to believe what you just said.
@ram-my6fl Жыл бұрын
Everything is an investment
@ErezElene Жыл бұрын
Yeah, except the only reason why renewables are cheap rn is because of massive, billion dollar government subsidies
@divinity1079 Жыл бұрын
Renewables are “cheaper” because they he government is footing the bill and using your tax money to pay for it. The actual cost of solar and wind is far larger than nuclear for the same energy produced. Nuclear can produce far more energy than any renewable, and even fossil fuel
@thesaint840010 ай бұрын
Renewables are bullshit. They're ugly, expensive and break. Nuclear is the best option.
@juri8723 Жыл бұрын
they dont want cheap energy
@ViktorVonfuling Жыл бұрын
Here in Sweden we’re having an energy crisis because the previous government decommissioned many of our nuclear reactors, in favour of renewables. Sounds great on paper, but our renewable energy isn’t enough to replace the reactors that they decommissioned. Which is why we have an energy crisis.
@crappozappo7 ай бұрын
What happened is right wing swedish politicians derailed climate policy, allowing people you like you to (inadvertantly? purposefully?) spread misinformation about how expensive renewables are and tout nuclear. Same thing happened with france and their "crisis"
@JayM- Жыл бұрын
Billionaires and corporations propaganda that’s why
@christopherg2347 Жыл бұрын
Because it is still a limited resource we have to dig up and nobody wants to have the toxic waste near their land or water sources.
@Ormathon Жыл бұрын
The toxic waste is handled more securely then pretty much anything else on this planet because its so bad. How is the waste from coal and oil plants handled in comparison, hmmm? Coal and oil can crap the bed at anytime because "meh its just a tiny fine".
@deerhawk7788 Жыл бұрын
But they don't, waste is stored on site
@fliporhold10 ай бұрын
Thorium dude.
@danmueller4021 Жыл бұрын
Short answer: government lobbying by investors of other energy sources. Primarily oil
@fancraze5218 Жыл бұрын
Preserve the nuclear energy for the days when there's no sun to oight your homes!.. maybe after a 500 million years from now😅
@chesterunited96 Жыл бұрын
Well, I'd say nuclear energy is safe but it can also be used as a target. Other forms of energy can also be attacked for example by missiles or anything else to weaken a population but the lasting damage isn't millions of years or however long the half life is of nuclear materials used today. If however there is a significant discovery of a way to reduce this radiation life of nuclear fuel/material and waste to zero or non significant then it can possibly be seen as viable. In case of being attacked the effects can still be mitigated.
@ante5544 Жыл бұрын
I understand what you're saying, and you make an interesting strategic argument. But I don't believe nuclear energy is that much of a threat. Reactor fuel is typically pretty weak compared to stuff used in nuclear carriers and especially weapons. Along with that, the more dangerous the isotope, the quicker that isotope decays. Most of the dangerous stuff at Fukushima released in the meltdown decayed within 2-10 years of the disaster, depending on the element and isotope. It's the same reason Chernobyl, the site of one of the worst kinds of reactor meltdowns you could conceivably have, is one of the most thriving nature preserves in Europe now, with the only remnant of the radioactive fallout being elevated cancer rates in the animal populations. The only credible danger I can think of with nuclear power is that the centrifuges you build to get reactor fuel can be pretty easily built upon to help make nuclear weapons. The solution to this is usually just to have countries that already have nukes make the fuel, then sell the fuel to non-nuclear powers who want it.
@robertpearson6760 Жыл бұрын
I loved this video. Johnny Harris nailing it as usual.
@masonfarnsworth1801 Жыл бұрын
Try googling anything he says. Lol
@divinity1079 Жыл бұрын
He was wrong on so much though
@kirankumareagleeye Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the interview with Natalie portman
@texasgunslinger8060 Жыл бұрын
"What happened to Nuclear Power?" Jane Fonda
@yacine778 Жыл бұрын
The best youtubers making a video 🎉
@songsbydaniel Жыл бұрын
Energy companies run the show... Nuclear is a threat to their bottom line.
@viktor8316 Жыл бұрын
how to make nuclear viable: cut safty features. nuclear is no longer competitiv. But another point is the lack of specialized workers for construction and maintanance of those power plants. No one is going to specialize in a craft that might no longer be needed in some years. Thus increasing the price further.
@marleymars2223 Жыл бұрын
I feel like you're gonna get a target on your back for doing that lol
@juangamez2883 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear waste
@opossumboyo11 ай бұрын
Nuclear energy takes a very long time to return any sort of profit, especially with massive inflation and interest. No modern corporate entity is willing to build something that produces next to no profit for the first decade of its life. Plus, the climate crisis is happening now and will likely compound into something far worse in the next decade. We’re approaching the point where it is far too late for nuclear.
@stephenbrickwood1602 Жыл бұрын
Framing the energy problem the wrong way means you solve the wrong problem. From ignorance they created a frame to work within. This is so stupid. They are actually better than this.
@Exodlus Жыл бұрын
Nuclear is better than everything we have watch "Nuclear Now" it explains ALOT. Using facts.
@jessicas.6235 Жыл бұрын
And I’m gonna…watch the outcome. 🍿😯
@davidhouseman4328 Жыл бұрын
Cost
@mifphilip Жыл бұрын
it is cheaper than ever.
@davidhouseman4328 Жыл бұрын
@mifphilip it's whether it's cheaper than the alternative. It wasn't against gas, and isn't against renewable (though it has other advantages like consistency).
@MountainLWolf Жыл бұрын
Never in this conversations do people bring up nuclear waste.
@divinity1079 Жыл бұрын
Nuclear waste is extremely dense and not nearly as dangerous as you think. The last 60 years of nuclear waste can fit in the size of one football field. Nuclear waste can even be recycled. We solved the waste “problem” many years ago, and it’s literally a non-issue
@irlshrek Жыл бұрын
goodness gracious shes gorgeous
@TheRealJakeRyanMusic Жыл бұрын
I love her face 🤷♂️
@DavidRamirez-tp1dj Жыл бұрын
Crazy question Batman ! What happens if china shoots a missile to a an operational nuclear plant ?
@daithonbrown7645 Жыл бұрын
wouldnt happen, promise you. now even if it heppened we simply retaliate like we’ve historically done for terrorist events
@kylerBD Жыл бұрын
Who gives a f uck? If china shoots a missle into an operational nuclear power plant the world is over no matter what. They could shoot a missle into the middle of the fucking desert and the world is over, doesnt matter either way.
@gainaxc2 Жыл бұрын
Even way more likely,what happens if it wear itself out due to poor American maintenance
@HB-gj7gd Жыл бұрын
Nothing
@ctgx7735 Жыл бұрын
Lmao, this comment is so American 😂
@snuggiebear01 Жыл бұрын
OMG you guys are girlfriends, sharing recipes….!😂
@natvis Жыл бұрын
we didnt
@sheikh3605 Жыл бұрын
Cuz oil need to be sold
@namesarecliche3850 Жыл бұрын
Oil does not produce commercial electricity. What kinda sheikh does not know that
@sheikh3605 Жыл бұрын
@@namesarecliche3850 sheikh is my surname. My name is. Sheikh Noman Uddin Ahamed Biddut
@sheikh3605 Жыл бұрын
@@namesarecliche3850 i guess the "me" kind of sheikh
@443MoneyTrees6 ай бұрын
I think it’s cuz nukes and nuclear waste maybe
@joshsinglefooter Жыл бұрын
What about the nuclear family? Talk about that.
@marshallmom1962 Жыл бұрын
CHERNOBYL
@JayM- Жыл бұрын
Is that the girl version of Johnny Harris 😂.
@paulbrouyere1735 Жыл бұрын
I am not afraid. I am telling you this is not the way to have a future. Please first have a full course on nuclear physics. That implies also chemistry. Now, even Einstein said this could be used wrong and he didn’t feel at ease with it, now you are trying to make people at ease without knowing anything about it? Please go back to your toys.
@kurtsudheim825 Жыл бұрын
Idk if it's got anything to do with male & female, the way we generally think, but only briefly knowing Johnny & more so cleo from theor previous collaboration, I find it so funny that he takes the cynical route & she the positive one
@p0elaha566 Жыл бұрын
First off nuclear fusion isn't a thing yet
@ThomasWayne4312Ай бұрын
Why? Bc NIMBY
@user-cx6rg6mr7d Жыл бұрын
fossil fuel company and nuclear weapon fear related to the nuclear power???????
@TheRustyLM8 ай бұрын
I’ll do a tag team with anyone as long as SHE is IT!
@Oi-mj6dv9 ай бұрын
Its incredibly doable. Im going to be very blunt. If it hasnt been done its because of public opinion being as dumb as ever, if thats even a possibility. China has planned the construction of more than a few reactors and france is thriving on its 56 plants. People shouldnt be given an option to choose on technical and strategical decisions such as energy national plans. It never made sense, it will never do.
@crappozappo8 ай бұрын
I like how you're just openly against democracy. That is logical. After all, Chernobyl came from that famously democratic country, the ussr
@uzu_maki_san7205 ай бұрын
We need to master this energy no matter what in at least 100 years orelse it would be difficult for us to survive on this planet n there's no PLANET B
@penio78 Жыл бұрын
Its just way to expensive and take so long to build a new NPP. Its not because of peoples fears, if it was just the fear the goverment has tools to overcome it.
@accountforcommenting Жыл бұрын
Fear is a tool, people are not rational and emotion cloud judgement
@Laroling Жыл бұрын
Well, absolute lack of fear and a 'god complex' isn't always great either.
@crappozappo8 ай бұрын
"People are scared of nuclear because they're just misinformed" This is such a great false talking point. Gleefully repeated to discredit anyone, usually successful because nuke people clap like seals.
@SecretLier Жыл бұрын
She is look like Natalie portman
@laughternights Жыл бұрын
Good collaboration🎉
@magua73 Жыл бұрын
You are both awesome!
@john38825 Жыл бұрын
The sheep thought it was scary
@GroundZero_US Жыл бұрын
The French just cut through all the BS and did it lol.
@gabriellupisan7003 Жыл бұрын
I subscribed for the love of knowledge, yet took a second to appreciate her beauty.
@-Turtl3_ Жыл бұрын
Please.
@Dexthesaga Жыл бұрын
Who is this girl??
@Sailed_away Жыл бұрын
Cleo Abram, she's also a content creator
@broteinsheikh Жыл бұрын
Of ig models
@AlmostEli Жыл бұрын
Oil propaganda and lobbying like everything else it ain’t hard
@fw1421 Жыл бұрын
One word…..Chernobyl. Then if that’s not good for you…nuclear waste. Where is a safe and secure place to put it after the nuclear rods are used up?
@SPEBM255 Жыл бұрын
Hanford Vit Plant
@chrishayes1660 Жыл бұрын
The sexual tension is too high here
@kittymervine6115 Жыл бұрын
let's say if Japan can't do it safely, no one can. Also from people that were in the industry, it's about PROFIT. Something so dangerous should not be run as a "for profit" by owners that live far away from where the plant is located. But Japan, making a bad mistake but they could not by culture GET THEIR CONCERNS HEARD, as it's all about status and respect...a lot of people changed their minds. Culture is what happened. In the US profit is king, Japan, you can't tell a mistake and be heard... and so so many other issues.
@garmr2512 Жыл бұрын
Dude this comment is so wrong and uneducated. Japan has announced this year they are getting back into nuclear energy. The reason they got it wrong the first time with fukushima was they cut costs and it was easily preventable. Also japan the same country that works it workers to suicide caring about safety that's laughable.
@anishshrestha8146 Жыл бұрын
Chernobyl
@josemorales5117 Жыл бұрын
Human error
@anishshrestha8146 Жыл бұрын
@@josemorales5117 duh
@eldadmastermind9356 Жыл бұрын
It's all politics.....there a future but politics took it away
@boser_ketchup3101 Жыл бұрын
Because everything else is cheaper. Solar is by far the cheapest one