I prefer Wix cuz the German Ads are hilarious XD ~~Actually I don't need a website ~~

The question is will there be anything about the Empire of Japan? For example, sengoku

Vedio idea: why japanese didnt invade india after they captured burma in 1942. Can you do a vedio on that.

If anyone wants to see my HOI4 timelapse here is the link kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsVdrdhps96Wenk.html

محمد و ليس مكمان ؟؟؟؟؟؟

The HRE says hello if you do

It's hard enough to get the Balkans by 1500 without a Europe wide coalition ;).

Pope declaring Crusade goes BRRRRRRRRRR

you can beat the coalition though. If you let europe thrive for a good 200 years, you will never be able to invade all of it

@@shadowstar901 they didn't stay inside for long, or at least they were inside just by name

I read that in Zapp's voice

They learned everything from the Byzantines.

@@Samet-yy9sj why you are acting crazy?

@@firstlast9626 they learned everything and became better at it. cope

How did it fight in the Crusades It didn’t exist

they still conquered it

@@Cameron-qc7yk what

The city of Otranto, and only temporarily

Pour cela l’italienne que je suis sera toujours reconnaissante à ce sacré Comte 🧛‍♂️

Dracula wasn't a Count. He was the Voivode of Wallachia.

@@recepgurbuz245 you mean constantinople? Cause the city was not as important when turks came

​@@recepgurbuz245 one of the, but the most important remain Rome

@Steve Smith are Russians Catholic?

@@recepgurbuz245 Constantinople (Constano + polis = Constantin's city) wouldn't exist without the roman empire.

Romans where way ahead of there time , and there war Tatics where brutal .

yes

Failed because Croatia.

@@n.m.8802 bro I just watched an oversimplified video so yh I am pretty sure you know who the sponsor is 😏😏😏😂😂😂😅😅😅

i thought bcuz they cud not bring those war elephants... 😄😄.

💪🏻🇦🇱💪🏻🇦🇱💪🏻🇦🇱KING SKËNDERBEU🇦🇱💪🏻🇦🇱💪🏻🇦🇱💪🏻🇦🇱💪🏻🇦🇱

Hello brother, Pope Pius awarded Albania lands in southern Italy for their defense of Christendom. Many Albanians fled as the ottomans took over. We call them Arberesh :) cheers

Cool. where are you from exactly? I come from Martano but live in Zurich.

he was serb

He was serb

Nikola Bogosavljevic of course Gjergj Kastrioti was serb 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️ Barack Obama is serb too

Knowledgia: Ottomans. Me, a russian: punching bag.

Me an Italian who's bad in English: Eighthands

Knowledgia: Ottomans Me, a Turk: a total *ucking disaster

@@user-xw5xo3bv1n You know,..Russia was sometimes our punching bag too

@@ramyheykal6705 really? Russian-turkish war (1568-1570). Russia won. 1. Russo-Turkish War (1676-1681). Disputed result. Russo-Turkish War (1686-1700). Russia won. 2. Russo-Ottoman War of 1710-11 during Russian war against Sweden. Sure, here Ottomans one. 1. Russo-Turkish War of 1735-1739. Russia won. 3. Russo-Turkish War (1768-1774). Russia won. 4. Russo-Turkish War (1787-1792). Russia won. 5. Russo-Turkish War (1806-1812). Russia won. 6. Russo-Turkish War of (1828-1829). Russia won. 7. So-called Crimean War (1853 -1856). Formally Russia lost it, however Russia was forced just to retreat from territories taken on early stage of war. And only because of British and French intervention. Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878). Russia won. 8. And of course WWI which both states in the end lost. So, three disputable results of war, 1 Ottoman victory... 8 russian victories.

Please stop talking nonsense and propaganda, the Republic of Venice and the Republic of Genoa had conquered half Turkey, Greece up to Ukraine and half the Balkan territory, how could the Ottomans conquer Italy, skanderbeg had asylum in Naples from the king Ferdinand when the Ottomans had colonized Albania, how can you say that nonsense, Italy won against the Turks even during the First World War for your information. Try reading some history books please.

​@@paxetamor8276 Venice and Genoa never gained those Aegean islands from Turks, they took them from the Byzantines. Later Ottomans kicked both of their asses and kicked them out of the Aegean. Stop your nationalistic bs propaganda.

@@paxetamor8276 Before your excitement to teach history, be noticed that interval of history you mention was during the Macedonian- Roman wars BC. This subject we are talking about belongs to 14th century.

@@sleros7773 You are confusing dates and years, the Ottoman Empire was born in 1299, while the Morea War, also known as the Sixth Turkish-Venetian War, was the military campaign, which took place between 25 April 1684 and 1699, with which the The Republic of Venice disputed control of the Morea (Peloponnese) and the Aegean Sea to the Ottoman Empire. This conflict, the sixth between Turks and Venetians, was part of the wider scenario of the wars of the Holy League, which saw the formation of a coalition of Christian states (including the Austrian Empire, the State of the Church and the Knights of Malta) opposing to the Turkish expansion in the Balkan peninsula.

@@tristormbarbarossa8406 I think there are many different stories about this story on the internet, you keep believing in your version.

The Ottomans had many enemies, if their only enemy was Italy, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult.

@@CountryRaceN Any large empire has many enemies lol. Romans had many enemies too.

@@teemuvesala9575 agreed

@@CountryRaceN read the battle of lepanto in the 1571---where a combination of italian,spanish & austrian troops on ship wiped out the turkish navy in a brutal huge battle

@@Ahmed_Malrogi.750 read the battle of lepanto 1571---where italian,spanish & austrian trrops wiped out the turkish navy

siege of corfu had a bigger impact since that campaign was directed to rome itself

The Ottoman never alway had it their way. Battle of Ankara: July 20, 1402 the only time in the 500-year history of the empire that a Sultan was captured in battle (he died after three months in captivity). The Battle of Vienna 1683 was the end of Ottoman westward advances .

@The Guardian Monke The only country in the east mediterranean.

@The Guardian Monke small islands are harder than conquering land, invasion of crete in ww2 for example times are different nevertheless with better technology the germans lost more soldiers than a normal land invasion.

@The Guardian Monke *fanatical monks with swords and cannons supplied by the Christendom

yea right now all turkish city like that.. example all houses like castle big and strong.

Decentralization is the way of the future. Especially currency.

@@goatface6602 Yeah. The future full of civil wars and overpowered corporations. Like in Holy Roman Empire. Great idea!

@@konanpl8936 In my opinion it's all about the ebb and flow. When it's time too decentralize, decentralize, when it's time to centralize, centralize.

@@goatface6602 problem is that's what ch¡na wants, they will happily swoop in and take over a decentralized, fractured USA

Western historians and the English in particular generally ignore the sheer might of the Ottoman power because they never had rtoconfront it when it was at its height. It was the successor state of the Christian east Roman empire

Les Albanais ont ensuite collaboré avec les Ottomans au point de changer de religion ! Quel formidable "achievement "!

@@domjuancourtleciel742 Et alors ? Qu’est-ce que ça peut bien te foutre ? Débile va

What history ? They are muslims now even though they were occupied by the Soviet and believing in religion was considered as a crime at that time

@@12gmkk29 500 years of occupation!! 500 years... Many atrocities had taken place and many compromises had to be made in order to survive!! During them years schools with the Albanian language were banned, practising christianity meant death penalty. So you can sympathise and understand, I guess. Now Albania is one of the most religion tolerant country in the world . You are free to practise and believe where you want without the slightest undermining or mocking by anyone, there are churches, mosques everywhere and not everyone are muslims. So just think for a moment and appreciate their sacrifices and battles they made, keeping all that river of power (ottoman empire) occupied and not reaching Europe. If you have read history, some of Albanians fled to southern Italy and were aknowledged aa heros, they still live there and talk Albanian (Arberesh). Austria and other European countries acknowledged Skanderbeg and Albanians for their accomplishments during that time. So don't just come to conclusions without taking in consideration other factors...

@Henryk Gödel indeed but that said there is another group in America that tries to erase all history of European Americans so they feel bad for the deeds of their ancestors

If anyone wants to see my HOI4 timelapse here is the link kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsVdrdhps96Wenk.html

Same thing is happening in most countries, i can vouch for Russia and Estonia, the new generations are out of their freaking mind here...

@@edgarratsep3631 what's happening?

@@mbathroom1 More and more people are becoming too far tolerated towards something that was considered a mental illness just 10 years ago. Not long ago some male freak that looks like Golumn from Lord Of The Rings a "great Estonian writer" if i'm not mistaken. He, or it, whatever he considers himself, gave a speech against traditional family values, called them old fashioned and dangerous to society. A big argue boiled out against such "activist" and most people sided with that disgustingly looking freak. Can you imagine how ridicules that is. I might be old fashioned and conservative but when those people get noticed and awarded by the president of the state then you know that this country is screwed. The same goes with Russia, I have seen so many things on social media in the last 5 years or so. I just don't understand how those people come to be. These sjw's are extremists and push for the destruction of what we always held holy(family, tradition, culture and history) and nobody does anything about it.

Yeah sadly the riches write history...there are plenty of amazing old civilizations and people that are not even mentioned in books

don't expect good rating from people who overrate themselves

Just imagine, Skanderbeg won 24 battles against Ottomans (and their allies) while being 5 to 20 times less in number in soliders, he held them for around 30 years. Let me remind you just three of his best battles. "The First Siege of Kruja" Sultan Murad II & Prince Mehmed II had over 150.000 soliders, Skanderbeg had only 8.000 men, and ended with Albanian (Skanderbeg) victory. "Battle of Albulena" Isak Bey and Hamza Kastrioti (his nephew who betrayed him, and knew all his tactics) had over 80.000 soliders, Skanderbeg had 7.000 men, and it resulted with Albanian victory, casualties and losses: 30.000 killed Ottoman soliders. "Second Siege of Kruja" Sultan Mehmed II (who at that time had conqueror Constantinople) had over 100.000 men, Skanderbeg had only 12.000 men, and it ended with Albanian victory, casualties and losses were too heavy for Ottomans, and many many other extraordinary and very interesting battles of Skanderbeg. And still no Hollywood movie is about him? 😏

@@blockie9706 they dont want albania to rise in any case not even in a movie the records of history make us one of the most feared battle born population

@@anddyandii5857 Romanians, Albanians, Lithuanians and Poles developed some of the most ferocious and lethal armies through the 1500s to the 1800s. Massively underrated.

@پیاده نظام خان Yes they did, ships dont mean nothing, it was the loss of experienced seamen which was the real blow, ottomans never had same naval power as before lepanto

@پیاده نظام خان Yea they clashed at sea but not in a domineering manner. Turks never had the maritime domination of pre-lepanto era.

Not to mention Spain was shielding Italy. Spain being the most powerful nation at the time.

Thank you for watching and for the correction! 🙂

Invasi Ottoman ke Otranto italy

Question is that real or did we just find artifacts

@@comrade2303 lmfao you're a special kind of ignorant.

@@comrade2303 No it's not real it's just both sides lied about but actually never happened. Only an ottoman-venetian conspiracy

@PassionOfLifee The mongol army was as united as Italy at the time. The army was mostly independent from Khan's orders, and could focus on multiple fronts using hordes ( basically group of armies getting split and consolidating power in a specific region)

@@fuhrerjohnson5115 In medieval era horse where like tanks, imagine a country only with the best tanks in the world without any aircraft

Agreed..as in Latin saying: "Nec Hercules contra duos"

America did ww2.

America technically fought 2 fronts during WW2. In general though you are correct. Fighting 2 fronts is almost always gonna end bad for you.

Spanish fighters..

very agree bro

And Otranto

@@CFITOMAHAWK2 shhh it is supposed to ignore Spain contributions or talk bad about them dude

@@zamirroa The dam dirty British SPANISH LEGENDS AND LIES. For centuries they are doing that.

I heard it was between shah İsmail and sultan Selim

@@benjamindavidovichwaals2899 It is possible... as I said it is a story told by people, sort of like a myth really, and they often switch characters... but it fits the times... I have heard it about Skanderbeg and Sultan Murat. Since Skanderbeg is at least 60 years earlier than Selim's time, sorry, but I am going to go with Skanderbeg and Murat.

@Alex C Glad you liked it.

@Alex C Sorry, I might be a bit confused: what does "cope" means?

As much as I respect Skanderbeg and his great tactical awareness on the battlefield , I have to call this story bollocks. An Ottoman Emperor of that era would never exchange the sword of a so called evil with the sword of God cast as justice. I respect Skanderbeg and Polish,Lithuanian Hussars as once enemies as they fought with their heart to defend their realm. If anyone would want to link someone to devil, there was no man on the earth of that era as vicious as Vlad the Impaler. The things that he has done to his own people let alone his enemies are beyond definition of hell.

on the bright side, I can finally enjoy "authentic" halal carbonara XD

LMAO

These things sound good tho

Panino e Ayran per la colazione...

İ want to try that dishes

I mean its not that bad today. Religious diversity has made Albanians not care about peoples religion and it has caused the country to have amazing dishes from many cultures. Visited it once and it was great to see Christians and Muslims have festivals together despite having a different religion.

Stop giving religious angle all the time 😡

It's still a half Catholic and half Orthodox split if you don't include the Muslim and irreligious.

It would be like a smaller version of Catholic Croatia vs Orthodox Serbia. Not that special. (Whatever that means) Au contraire local Muslims in the heart of Europe are even more interesting.

That would be interesting, but albanians have a better version coming. When religions will stop getting financed from muslim countries, albanians will return to their roots, paganism, where people would consider nature as god. The sun, the sky, the sea.

And thus through Austria.

How about the Ottoman base at Tunisia? Why they didn't launch their troops from there?

@@agailham8476, The Ottoman's didn't have a big enough navy to land a large enough army plus supplies to conquer Italy. Italy could have easily rushed a bigger army on foot to crush any landings by the Turks.

@@agailham8476 The Knights Hospitalar were viben in Malta (they still exist to this day). They were the biggest thorn in the Ottoman's side.

Hi my friend. Remember me?

Yes

@Military Comparison Videos You're probably Turkish aren't you? But let me just say that firstly i never said the Ottomans weren't also mighty. They were both the strongest empires of the time and it led to some grisly fights. Some won by the ottomans and their allies. Some won by the spanish and their allies. Secondly, in europe, spanish armies dominated the battlefield. With the Spanish Tercios able to defeat all challengers until improvements of artillery led to the formation becoming more vulnerable. Spanish armies were active in Germany and the Netherlands, so no it wasn't just native american cultures they were fighting, but well armed well equipped European principalities, especially during the protestant reformation movement. Most historians think that if the Spanish had actually managed to land the armada invasion force bound for England in 1588, they would have won. But most of it died at sea due to storms and the naval command ability of Francis Drake. Thirdly, why did the Ottomans never effectively invade southern Italy? It would have been an ideal stepping stone towards Rome itself, the heart of Christendom at the time. They could have done it before the defeat at sea in battle of lepanto. The reason was that there was a sizable spanish garrison defending southern italy and sicily, otherwise the italian cities of the south would have been extremely vulnerable.

Thats actually not totally right, spain went banktupt during late 16th century

@@aydnmesuttorun8397 It remained a powerful empire though. I think the loss of the Armada invasion fleet for England hurt it's economy a lot and made it's treasure fleet more vulnerable to pirates and english privateers. But some ships would still get through, gold was less and less but silver remained steady provided they weren't intercepted. Spain though in decline still hold a global spanning empire. But it lost the netherlands, lost what money there was in the 30 years war, and had a change of dynasty marking the end of the hapsburg alliance with Austria. And it's holding in southern Italy eventually evolved into the independent Kingdom of Naples. Turkey remained strong for another hundred years, culminating in the second siege of Vienna, after that it too went into decline. The age of enlightenment came, and both the Ottomans and Spain were very old fashioned and struggled to modernize and keep up with the west, northern europe in particular.

And of course, Don Juan of Austria, the great Hapsburg prince who led the West to victory at Lepanto. He dies young, some say because he was poisoned by King Phillip of Spain because he was so successful in the Netherlands.

The Pope had Spanish Soldiers placed all over the south regions of Italy all south of Vatican City to fight and stop the Muslims. It worked. Then the Muslims went to Eastern Europe to invade instead. But the could not win in Italy. Spain even defeated The French tryin to invade from the Milan area, and even captured a french king that in arrogance dared to set foot in Milan area. They brought that king to Spain Madrid as a prisoner. Shame for France too.

@@CFITOMAHAWK2 isn’t that the French king whom the ottomans were able to free by going to war? Lol

@@albak6552 THEN IT WAS CAPTURED AGAIN IN MILAN AREA.

​@@albak6552No, where do you get that nonsense from? Francis I was imprisoned in Madrid and was forced to sign a treaty in which he renounced his claims in Italy in exchange for his freedom. To guarantee his word, Francis himself ordered his two sons to be brought from France, and left them hostage. He still broke his word.

But we helped a lot of people

+Soul he didn't need help ; his realm diminished only after his death

@rvtrcr funding a single and comparably small kingdom against what was at the time the most powerful empire of the known world was only delaying the inevitable and not really helping to solve the problem they could have called for a crusade and evened the odds which would have been actual helpful. I know they called one but the pope died shortly after and albania was the only country that joined it while the rest of the european countries didnt bother due to not seeing it as a direct threat or being busy otherwise.

@Paolo Tanfoglio all of these battles occurred after the fall of the balkans i never said that albania somehow played an important role in these battles so dont try to spin words around. And all of these battles were fought by HOLY LEAGUES so joint forces, and my comment above says that if the western Countries would have formed an holy league earlier instead of just sending money, the lnvasion could have been delayed or completely stopped but they chose to not bother until the ottomans were at their doorstep.. And turkey was a dying empire at the beginning of ww1 so the independence movement would have succeeded anyway like most independence movements in the balkans during that time period

@@christermi he needed help because he was planning a crusade

They were sourounded by many powerfull sovereigns. So to preserve the territrories are more challenging than conquer a new one..

The Guardian Monke Lepanto happened much later even after Suleyman The Magnificent

He also forgot about the siege of Malta in which the Ottomans were trying to get Malta to use as a base of operations for an invasion of southern Italy. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Siege_of_Malta

@@arolemaprarath6615 anyone who knows History at the Most basic level does actualy.

@@arolemaprarath6615 wait and see , what happen in the next decade.

Actually there's no any British accent at all.None

Adam Kaczmarek Greeks : Hold my Ouzo.

And centuries later the same France liked it's demise.

@@girdharsingh4287 damn what a way to describe Frances involvement in the middle east during ww1 😂😂😂

Wow that is funny. Even funnier when multiple people post roughly the same comment. I just couldn't stop laughing every time I saw it.

You know that Ottoman was in alliance with England against Napoleon right?

Huzzah! A man of culture!

The whole empire designed for expansion. I think your words are a joke about eu4, right?

Our aggressive expansion like towards 250... :) Because of it, all Europa sent crusades entire century xd. Greetings from Turkey :)

@Gökgün Tandoğan you mean democracy?

@@ibrahimkaplan5875 turkey and the ottomans are a different thing. It's not you

True ! It was the center of roman-german Empire

rome

if they had managed to conquer it, most of europe would be turkish

@@esramnor6734 German

@precizion_ i like when cultured people write in the comments. Salute sir!

The Ottoman never alway had it their way. Battle of Ankara: July 20, 1402 the only time in the 500-year history of the empire that a Sultan was captured in battle (he died after three months in captivity). The Battle of Vienna 1683 was the end of Ottoman westward advances . WW1 was the complete defeat of the ottomans.

@پیاده نظام خان shut up arab. He is right..

@@Crashed131963 ne alaka

Chad Uzun Hasan 🇦🇿

Fatih isterse Akkoyunluyu bitirirdi otlukbeli savaşında akkoyunlunun belini kırdı osmanlı 1000 kayıp verirken akkoyunlu 40000-50000 kayıp verdi akkoyunlu türk ve müslüman olduğu için saldırmadı

Yes but actually yes 😂

In that period of history seems so

Aldion Canaj Skenderbeu shpetoj Europen po skujtohet aq sa duhet

@@vllai5785 esht sarkazem x ata qe s'japin as nje pike x kete vend

Here a short movie clip on how Skanderbeg crushed the Ottomans. This shows the Ottoman siege of the Albanian city of Kroja - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rdmfdK2g2b2om58.html

yeah, looks pretty shocking in our contemporary eyes but history has its crazy episodes.

And for us Turks, first we learn about Atatürk and Fatih as second.

Think about what he did... Small country and small troops against the biggest empire of that era. As long he lived Albania never fold or fallen off. Amazing warrior

@@robertomasserut2804 Truly a charismatic leader and great warrior

@@memduhyalcner4584 ottoman empire was the strongest in the world for centuries...

İ dont know what they teach things about ottoman but you should know ottoman dont chance your grand grand father's religion and race you look to greece ottoman hold greece 400 years but thet are cristian and greek and you can look near of greece . Ottoman just want to provide equal condition for humankind

*laughs in Latin* 🤣🤣🤣 ..

ottomans succesfully landed on italy, he just died before he could invade.

Venni, vetti, no vicci. -Mehmet

well played... **laughed in etruscan slang

*cries in turkish*

The sultan who planned to conquer Italy ( mehmet II) lived way before than those events

@Sultan Abdulhameed II Maybe in your dreams

Yeah thanks to Albanians..

@Fantaclaus, I am from Pozzallo, yes the Cabrera Tower was build against the Saracence and pirates

Literally every map and Paradox game : *makes Venice pinkish purple* Those guys :yellow

To be honest all games portray them as purple

@@alexeptop Pinkish purple? Dude, venice is light blue

@@kagtkalem7115 tell me what game

Shame on u

@@runaakter1020 lmao look at yourself

Saved? Rather doomed

Italians let Albanians come and form some towns in southern italy 500 years ago. Puglia Lucania Calabria Sicily

@@joefresh6050 Molise too

The turkish İ

Then comes Selim and they poop

@@schizokal9563 and ? Like so what ? 😂

@@comradekenobi6908 🤨

@@kasadam85 nvm

France allied the Turks though.

France were called the Turks of Europe lmao. u good ?

@@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser SHAME ON French

@@iuiu8831 Austria and Habsburgs were worse. That's why they needed to ally against them

​@@cs0345Worse why?? Spain or the Habsburgs didn´t threat the existance of France never, but Ottomans in fact were trying to destroy all the west. If it wasn´t because the aeternal european wars Constantinopla could have been recovered in the XVI century.

Haha. Veoma jadno.

Yes praise the white Europeans ❤

If it wasn't for the colonialism and the slave trade, you'd all be celebrating eid today.

@@bostonluyasar7045 the biggest slave market in history of humanity was the Muslim Ottoman Empire. And, the biggest colonial empire, before England grabbed India, was also Ottoman Empire (followed by the Persian Empire). So, glass houses there. Also, Europe's colonialism was a product of its dominance, not vice versa. It's better ships, better guns, more industrialization based on scientific revolution that made it all possible. So you are making a circular argument.

Albania is overrated

TDH bruh no ones even heard of Albania 💀 tf you talking about?

@@rolandlimani4503 lmao no but every single Albanian thinks theyre some god nation

@@tdh2044 We'll take your word for it if you say so

TDH cause we are. Our Latin name “Albanian” translates to white man. We are the literal definition of European

In Skanderberg Romanian is called wrestling

@@dlalwon1 stjupid,,

@@dlalwon1 the more you know

@@horner385 do you know the reason why?

really? wow, how?

They warred with both with both the British empire and the Roman empire

@@colterwebb6382 haha they can't save themselves by Islamisation image attila 🇧🇬 If he was lived no ottoman empire anymore

İlber, kadında bir bacak var.

Bullshit, he got his ass kicked at Otranto. Watch the siege of Otranto

@@Tortellobello45 He wasnt even in Otranto, and the invasion was called off after he died.

@@Tortellobello45 Source: Trust me bro i was there

@@stormcloaks1042 🤡🤡imagine not accepting defeat

​@The Wheel dud I don't know why but i think you never where in Albania ! and if there is some hate is because of WW2 1939 when they launched there attack against us for obviously no reason ! But i think your just Islamophobic ! just a quick remider ! You do know that our forFathers where the Illyrians ! By a fact you should know that Constantine was born in the province of Dardania(Kosovo) next to Dacia in the village of Nissus ! By a fact you should know that Constantine the Great was Illyrian the one who founded the Capital of the believers ! By a fact you should know that justinian the Great was from the same province of Dardania ! by a fact you should know what they did for the Roman Empire and the Eastern Empire ! And our Capital was Constantinople ! It was for us the capital of the believers ! Those who believed in Christ in europe before anyone else ! Now let me ask you this if a other Relgions conquers it ? what would be your duty ? You as a believer ? The answers is there in the video you should do the same thing as Skenderbeek ! now let me tell you this the salvs aren't believers and where never really part of the Roman empire ! the Germans neither !So obviously for them its nota Big deal ! But for us ! who stayed somewhat 1500 years in the Roman empire ! what do you think we would feel like if Constantinople feel ? We would have feel bad ! Bad in a way where whe ask our self is Islam the reall religion since it conquered constantinople and is it possible that we have erred !? The answer is go retake it and deffend it again! Lets see If GOD the Almighty gives us victory !because only Allah gives victory and He gives it to Whom He Wills ! Well what happend !? We tried By God we tried it harder then every other country and its people ! the truth is We couldn't retake our Honor Our Glory Back !! 25 years of Hard work ! Was yet not enough ! And the only thing you the Barbarians where after was Money ! you didn't give dame thing about Honor and Valor ! So know our beloeved city was conquered by Islam ! What other choice did we have ? No other choice was left ! Islam conquered Constantine ! It was but a sign for the Romans ! that Prophet Muhammad (saws) was indeed the true Last Prophet ! Soon after in the late 16 century we accepted Islam ! especially Dardania whom the serbs called Kosovo ! God is a witness of our bravery and sacrifice !and the Whole World !

@olsi pajo loo even 10%

@rvtrcr hey heu hey watch your mounth to speak our Balkan people . WE WILL BE UNION ONE DAY UNDER THE GLORY NATION OF TURKS .

No we don't lol

many emperors of ROMA were Albanians (illyrians) dont forget that

I mean the european union is a joke.

Ehhh Bitter Truth 😒

Well last year official talks started about Albania joining the EU. But I guess you understand that Albanian 15th century warfare will not be a factor?

Unfortunately, most Albanians converted to Islam. Today, 60% of the Albanian population is muslim. To make matters worse, recently the Albanian government has made a deal with the Turkish government to upgrade/improve the Albanian Armed forces. Partly in response to this and the recent Turkish aggression towards Greece, Italy and France have recently signed a treaty to collaborate and help each others in case of Turkish aggression. Albania is now seen as "sleeping with the enemy". So, nope. We don't want Albania to join the EU. We don't trust Albania. I say this with sorrow. But, it's the reality.

@@scipio1010 bro analbania have no history they exist from 1444-1479 wtf is this neither twenty years history

I think that it is more like Skanderbeg than Italian defense. Italy has been all the time the first country which get collapsed (for example WW1 or WW2). I hardly think that Italy would be an Ottoman province than unoccupied country. At all Skenderbeg defended directly Albania (that time as Arberia), but in indirectly way Italy too. He won 25 battles in row, but none of Christian world countries help him, but also Venice supported Ottomans to occupied any Arberia land for themselves. I am not blaming anyone, but Skanderbeg was also a main factor, who avoid Italy occupation by Ottomans.

​@Carmine Paola So WTF are Turkish in this case? Gjergj Kastrioti (Scanderbeg) was Albanian commander which fought with Albanian against ottomans. In this case Gjergj Kastriot beside the defense of Albania from ottomans, he indirectly in same time save the Europe from the mutual enemy, Ottomans. There was Albanian lives who fought against Turkish. Might you have a good army, but the war against Austro-Hungary (also Austro hungary was about to collapse that time) wasn't in the same time when had been placed that war against ottomans. For further, Albanian Army won 25 battles in row against Ottomans when the turkish was at glorious times, all alone. (Because Europe was making dirty bussiness with Ottomans)😉Don't underestimate our force too!

Buffon Baresi Maldini Nesta Chiellini Cannavaro...best defenders...forza azzurri 💙

İf mehmed didn't dead italy will conquer.

@@cihanozel4344 English grammar man, Do you know it?

Is it spaghetti?

Then you should rethink your history interests.

@@thehistoryenthusiast4956 I also love alternatives

@@surriyajabeen2646 like what?

@@thehistoryenthusiast4956 you know like alternate history

Nope 🤣🤣

@@blockie9706 and they still failed conquer italy 🤣

@@blockie9706 Yeah

Skanderbeg*

@@_iustin_n8960 Dracula was just a wannabe vampire, he more killed his people than ottomans, you know that Skanderbeg won 25 battles without any lose, right ? How many your dracula won ? 🤦‍♂️

The Pope had Spanish Soldiers placed all over the south regions of Italy all south of Vatican City to fight and stop the Muslims. It worked. Then the Muslims went to Eastern Europe to invade instead. But they could not win in Italy. Spain even defeated The French tryin to invade from the north, the Milan area, and even captured a french king that in arrogance dared to set foot in Milan area. They brought that king to Spain Madrid as a prisoner. Shame for France too. The Spanish won in South and North Italy.

Yeah, my city (Pisa) he rebelled against the Florentine oppression and with the support of Charles the Eighth we founded the second Pisan republic which lasted until 1512. it did not have an army but rather it was the same citizens who fought all together. venice gave us six supplies because in the past we were great allies

@@CFITOMAHAWK2 yeah, exactly, but the singular Italian states wasn't the decadent states of the later centuries, Venice, the duchy of Florence, the viceroyames of Naples and Sardinia (under Spanish control) was very powerful at the time (in lepanto only the venetian new galeazze, a proto Galeon, destroyed 108 Turkish galleys). It wasn't so easy to attack Italy even in xv century before the Spanish conquest. Look the Otranto siege. But also the battle of Fornovo against france. In renaissance The Italian states when united and with the help of a foreign power or even the pope was a difficult enemy in homeland.

@@oskareriksson2202 With the help of that foreigh power" ? . Yes, the Aragon , then all of Spain united from 1492. The Muslims then went away to conquer eastern europe instead.

Now Skanderbeg was a man of Honor and true warrior - that can't be said for Vlad the Impaler he is the true personification of Dracula since it's all around his character though fiction of course but gives you an idea who he was...

Thats true, Skanderberg defended,m Vlad was just stauing behind his castle and putting everyone who is muslim on top the spikes. He didnt win a battle. He lost immediately when Mehmet sent some troops.

@Dusk Spawn He killed his own people and was even disliked by his own barons wtf you on about? the only Turks he impaled were 2000 scouts army caught off guard Mehmed cut of his head and hung it on the gates of Constantinople and if it wasn't for his brother Radu pleading with Mehmed, Romania might have not even existed

@@theturkish1373 Hahaha you're spitting nothing but facts my boy 💯💯💯💯 😜

@@agentopaque3776 wrong!!!!!!!! Romania would have been a Muslim country if Vlad didn’t do his thing thing ! Vlad killed his enemies who were plotting against him. They were deceptive and he spotted them out. Off with their heads.

I agree, i'd wonder if the Ottomans succeeded in conquoring Morocco, they would've probably launched a few exploration journeys into the atlantic just like Carthage did thousands of years ago.

@@mouath_14 Why? Unlike the Europeans, Ottomans already were in India no need for further exploration. Instead they would have recaptured lost Muslim land in Spain.

I'm Turkish and everything you say is wrong

@@padredemishijos12 "lost Muslim lands" lol! How are they lost if they were stolen and never belonged to you in the first place? By your logic, then iraq, Afghanistan and iran belongs to the Mongols who lost it later on. Spain never belonged to the Muslim invaders in the first place.

@@padredemishijos12 "lost Muslim lands" lol! How are they lost if they were stolen and never belonged to you in the first place? By your logic, then iraq, Afghanistan and iran belongs to the Mongols who lost it later on.

No way 🥺 And why analbania is the only fake islamic state in Europe?

@@denkapeneva2018 because i say so !

*Europe has Lost there Shield

@@agonv7812 *Their* not There!

@@user-sx2jx6yn3j yes

@Texas Iboa Very true!

Well I never heard he said such thing lmao

Iberia always gets little positive media attention due to the Black Legend.

Battle of Lepanto didn't break the naval power of Ottomans at all. Just a year after the battle Ottomans had the same fleet size.

@@precursors ended the ottoman superiority of Mediterranean sea and saved up Italy. Thank you Spain, it's a shame the world see you as a monster like the Nazi Germany.

@@zamirroa What? Italian states completely lost naval power after discovery of new world. And nobody sees Spain as Nazi Germany! What are you talking about??

@@precursors much people trash talk about the Spain's past

Just shtp weak shit

And he was Serbian

@@dejangamingytgameszaramoth1852 🤣🤣 Sure he was, so is Alexandervić the greatvić, Napoleonvić Bonapartvić, Genghisvić Khanvić, and many others.

Mehmed the Conqueror was the Kaiser of Rome, but the others were Ottoman kaisers.

Mehmed the Conqueror could speak Turkish, Italian, Latin, Greek and Arabic very well, the reason why I mentioned Turkish is bc many Ottoman sultans actually couldn't speak it, the language royal family spoke was a mix of Persian, Arabic and Turkish. So, only people in Anatolia spoke Turkish at the time.

Oh and also, Venice and Genoa ruled the Mediterrean at the time. So the Ottomans surely had many problems trying to conquer Italy.

@@islamisthetruth3402 Yeah, but Venice and Genoa never fell under Ottoman rule, meaning the Ottomans never conquered any area of the Italian Peninsula, that's what I intended to say.

Asmoh and after a few years a lethal defeat was inflicted by Venetians to Ottomans, that victory by the Ottomans was really nothing

@carmine paola You are the only one I can find who mentions LePonto. This history is utterly incomplete without LePonto--and the Seige of Belgrade.

@@xtusvincit5230 Lepanto

The Pope had Spanish Soldiers placed all over the south regions of Italy all south of Vatican City to fight and stop the Muslims. It worked. Then the Muslims went to Eastern Europe to invade instead. But they could not win in Italy. Spain even defeated The French tryin to invade from the north, the Milan area, and even captured a french king that in arrogance dared to set foot in Milan area. They brought that king to Spain Madrid as a prisoner. Shame for France too. The Spanish won in South and North Italy.

Yes.

Amen

Matthew 16:22-23 KJV Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. [23] But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men. Also 1 Corinthians 1:11-17 KJV For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. [12] Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. [13] Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul? [14] I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius; [15] Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name. [16] And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other. [17] For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. And yes while it is true Cephas means a stone and is Peter. You were never supposed to follow Peter or a man but Jesus Christ. And that "rock" in reality is Jesus Christ, Deuteronomy 32:15-21 KJV But Jeshurun waxed fat, and kicked: thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered with fatness ; then he forsook God which made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation. [16] They provoked him to jealousy with strange gods, with abominations provoked they him to anger. [17] They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not. [18] Of the Rock that begat thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee. [19] And when the Lord saw it, he abhorred them, because of the provoking of his sons, and of his daughters. [20] And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be : for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith. [21] They have moved me to jealousy with that which is not God; they have provoked me to anger with their vanities: and I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation. Also please cite your verses Matthew 16:18 KJV And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And use a King James. Also the covid pandemic prevailed awfully well....

@@Victor-iq5rd this train is never late

Sponsor 😂😂😂😂😂😂

If I remember correctly, the Ottomans were still using Angelfire.

Actually Ottoman Empire had everything they were one of the most powerful state in the world in that time, Mehmed had just conquered the Istanbul, so the army was tired. Even a really big Empire like Ottoman should stop because there were really different nations and religious in there it is hard to control. Ottoman was giving its people what they need people were live in peace and wealth but still sometimes it wasn't enough

@@emirerkanemiroglu2813 europe would never stay unter ottoman for long even if they had been conquered. look how long wallachia prevailed and defied the turks because they never allowed their culture to be dominated by muslims and at the end they always had problems with european territories and revolts.

@@emirerkanemiroglu2813 I still don't think they had Squarespace, tho 🤔

I wouldn't say that they didn't have adequate resources, at least not on land. They attacked and besieged Vienna in both 1529 and 1683, even though they suffered defeats on both occasions.

Broke where in Italy ?

But Ottomans didn't exist as a strong Anatholic State in thirteenth century. And the Kingdom of Sicily lost almost of its African possessions at the end of the twelfth century.

Actually Ottoman Empire Made Conquering Papa Plan too But Fatih Sultan Mehmet died before plan started.

You have your timelines really messed up.

I was just about to say that, the battle of Lepanto halted the Ottomans from making any more forays into the Italian states, it proved their unity when faced with a common treat!

The ottomans got enemies From the eas and north,... Not just albania

It’s all about unity I guess skenderbeg United Albanian lords and formed a strong small army with great strategy that won every battles against ottomans one was a draw and the one when skenderbeg went to Italy to fight ottomans king Alfonso asked him to ,

@Carozon 93 Sure, But On The North All The Principates Were Connected, It Was Easy For The Principates Up North To Join Their Powers, While Albania Was Surrounded From The Ottomans From All Sides, Not to Mention Albanian Population At The Time Was Only 200.000 Thousand, While Ottoman Empire Had A Population Of 15.000.000 Million (Thats 75 Ottomans For Every One Albanian) Yet Greeks, Serbians, Bulgarians, While; Much Larger In Population, Didn't Achieved What Albania Did, Holding Back The Ottoman Empire At Its >>>Prime Time

@ITS FACTZ "If Suleiman Was Still Alive"??? I Respond To That With: If George Kastrioti Was Still Alive...!!!! I'm Sorry Turkey Wasn't Able To Produce Heroes Like Europe Did. All Turkey Had Going For Them Was Sheer Numbers, And Stealing European Boys, With The Hope Of Turning Them Into Turkish Fighters, Since The Turks Knew They Lack Of Real Men!

@ITS FACTZ All I'm Hearing Is Just A Bunch Of Muslim Names; That The World Does Not Recognize Of! PS: Turkey Tried To Hard With Hungary, Never Got Anything Though! Hungarians Don't Budge Easy Either

@پیاده نظام خان The Republic of Venice had since the beginning of its 15 centuries of Life as " city state" a leader called the " Doge" . It was a form of leader with strong Powers in His hands , not exactly like the modern democratic republics as We mean today . And It had dominions from the italian mainland such Lombardy ( Brescia and Bergamo towns) , through the whole Veneto region , the Friuli , the Istrian peninsula , the Dalmatian islands ( today's Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia) , the Albanian and Montenegro coasts harbours , Cyprus and many others Greek islands . That's why It was equal to a " kindom" with the Doge playing the role of a King even if He was elected by a restricted line of whealthy traders and not the whole people of Venice ,like a modern Democracy would mean today for instance .

@پیاده نظام خان Not exactly , closer to what today Is the Pope election rather than a Presidential Republic of a democratic state . It Is a system of the past not represented today , at least in any EU countries other than the Vatican city . However the past Doge owned also religion head role in opposition to the past popes . In such a manner that there was the Venetian Patriarch not totally depending by the Roman Pope .

@@piersp38 Montenegro coasts was called veneta Albania until 18 century

De no ser por España, hoy toda Italia rezaba mirando a la Meca!

@@tombellum6815 Spain invaded Italy like the Turks would . Yes They fought , with Us against Them but from here saying " thanks " , better You study History few more times , starting from the composition of the fleets Who won the Lepanto battle and the admirals who led it . I finish saying never Spain won against Venice , which the Republic last for more than 13 centuries , against French , Spanish , German and several Italians , Popes included .

He already did

He won cuz he served the ottomans. He knew Turkish tactics and used it to his advance.

@Albo Bad he was a Ottoman governor and bannerlord. WİKİPEDİA=Skanderbeg's display of military merit in several Ottoman campaigns, that Murad II (r. 1421-51) had given him the title of vali. At that time, Skanderbeg was leading a cavalry unit of 5,000 men.---he had a military education from the Enderun school(Ottoman Military School).

@Albo Bad the Ottoman Empire never used all of their troops in the Balkan if the ottoman used all of their troops Albania had not even a little chance not even 1% the ottomans thought they are weak as the Serbians or other Balkan states

@Albo Bad .Yes but they aren't grand ottoman army (ordu-yi hümayun). the sultan only sent his pashas on them.

That’s true

Why did they then jump into bed with the Turks

But he wasn't Albanian

@@UnleashedDaemon genocide huh? GENOCIDE? excuse me sir but if ottomans genocide people of where it conquered, probably there will be no more greeks, arabs , bulgarians more and more. And remember it no one forget african, american , asian colonises of england france or any western power.

@@OhioluAntitiKum What about Armenian genocide

Nice rebuttal. It really shows a thoroughly researched and informed position on the subject. No doubt you came to your conclusion after years of study and dedication. Not really.

@پیاده نظام خان Goes to show that just because you have a keyboard and are a muslim, that doesn't mean you can be trusted with historical accuracy-"grand daughter".

@پیاده نظام خان History never repeat itself, so of course you can never make a comparison between Carthage/Rome and Ottomans/Italy. BUT, there are some similarities.

Woow? You mean woe ?

Skenderbeg was Serbian

Niko Belic so is milos obilic , karadordevic all of them albanian

Niko Belic yeah I know so is my toilet!

@@RealAlbo4life i don't know about that

Spain wasn't there in late 1400

@@NoName-hg6cc 1469 castile and aragon United. The reconquesta was practically over as granada had become a vassal of castile for 100 years. In the 1400s Western countries with Atlantic coasts were becoming very powerful and advanced. France and England. The holy roman empire at the time was very strong and was heavily involved in Italy. Before the capture the Portuguese under John the navigator who was a member of the knights of christ (Templars) had invaded muslim North Africa

@@NoName-hg6cc ARAGON IS SPAIN. CASTELNUOVO, MALTA, LEPANTO... SPAIN

Indeed. You are right. Spain. Constantinople was captured by the Ottoman Empire on 29 May 1453. Otranto (in Italy) was captured in 1480 by an Ottoman army under Gedik Ahmed Pasha who main goal were using Otranto as a base camp to invade Italy (I repeat in 1480). This is the last quarter of the 1400s (XV centuries). Do you think was that enough to avoid the fall of the whole Italian peninsula during the 16th and 17th centuries, at the height of its power, under the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent? The presence of the Spanish Empire in the Eastern Mediterranean (due to the South of Italy was ruled by the Spanish kings) was concerned the Ottoman sultans like Suleiman, who saw it as an early indication of Spanish's intention to rival Ottoman dominance in the region. You can check several defeats of the Ottoman Empire due to the Spanish Empire during the 1500s:The Siege of Castelnuovo in 1538,the Great Siege of Malta occurred in 1565 or the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. Regarding the Siege of Castelnuovo despite the failure of Spanish forces to retain the fortress, Castelnuovo's defense was sung by numerous contemporaneous poets and praised all over Christian Europe. The Spanish soldiers who participated in the unequal engagement were compared with mythological and classical history heroes like Leonidas in The Battle of Thermopylae, being considered immortal due to the magnitude of their Spanish feat. Regarding the Great Siege of Malta, the Ottomans invaded Malta in 1565, undertaking the Great Siege of Malta, which began on 18 May and lasted until 8 September. At first it seemed that this would be a repeat of the battle on Rhodes, with most of Malta's cities destroyed and half the Knights killed in battle; but a relief force from Spain entered the battle, resulting in the loss of 10,000 Ottoman troops. This victory became one of the most celebrated events of sixteenth-century Europe, to the point that Voltaire said: "Nothing is better known than the siege of Malta." It undoubtedly contributed to the eventual erosion of the European perception of Ottoman invincibility, although the Mediterranean continued to be contested between Christian coalitions and the Turks for many years. Regarding the Battle of Lepanto, in the history of naval warfare, Lepanto marks the last major engagement in the Western world to be fought almost entirely between rowing vessels, namely the galleys and galeasses. The battle was in essence an "infantry battle on floating platforms". It was the largest naval battle in Western history since classical antiquity, involving more than 400 warships. The victory of the Spanish Empire was of great importance in the history of Europe and of the Ottoman Empire, marking the turning-point of Ottoman military expansion into the Mediterranean, although the Ottoman wars in Europe would continue for another century but by land wars. It has long been compared to the Battle of Salamis, both for tactical parallels and for its crucial importance in the defense of Europe against imperial expansion. It was also of great symbolic importance in a period when Europe was torn by its own wars of religion following the Protestant Reformation. Pope Pius V instituted the feast of Our Lady of Victory and Philip II of Spain used the victory to strengthen his position as the "Most Catholic King" and defender of Christendom against Muslim incursion. Regarding the Battle of Lepanto, the historian Paul K. Davis writes that: "More than a military victory, Lepanto was a moral one. For decades, the Ottoman Turks had terrified Europe, and the victories of Suleiman the Magnificent caused Christian Europe serious concern. The defeat at Lepanto further exemplified the rapid deterioration of Ottoman might under Selim II, and Christians rejoiced at this setback for the Ottomans. The mystique of Ottoman power was tarnished significantly by this battle, and Christian Europe was heartened." The engagement was a significant defeat for the Ottomans, who had not lost a major naval battle since the fifteenth century. The Ottoman defeat has often been cited as the historical turning-point initiating the eventual stagnation of Ottoman territorial expansion. The Spanish Christian victory at Lepanto confirmed the de facto division of the Mediterranean, with the eastern half under firm Ottoman control and the western under the Spanish Empire, halting the Ottoman encroachment on Italian territories. The historian Paul K. Davis synopsizes the importance of Lepanto this way: "This Turkish defeat stopped Ottomans' expansion into the Mediterranean, thus maintaining western dominance, and confidence grew in the west that Turks, previously unstoppable, could be beaten".

The siege was lifted because the Ottoman Captain Turgut Reis was martyred in the siege of Malta. Leaders are important in eastern societies. If the leader dies, the war ends and the army disperses. In all wars, the westerners tried to kill the ottoman sultans, they attacked the center directly because they knew that the army would disperse when the leader dies. This happened in Malta and in many wars.

@@yusufklc2962 aggressors aren't martyrs

@@jonm1418 If you look at the Maltese-Ottoman relations before the war, you will see that the Ottomans were not the aggressor. Your dead go to hell, our dead go to heaven.

@@yusufklc2962 lol, the strongest army in Europe repelled by a few hospital guards. Seethe, mald and cope harder. It is not your place to say who goes to hell or heaven. Learn your own religion.

@@jonm1418 The indigenous people of Malta are Arabs. Their religion is Catholic. Strong army is useless in island wars. I do not belittle the victory of the Maltese. The Turks lost 80,000 soldiers for the Aegean Islands alone. The reasons for these wars are the attacks of the island states or the state that dominates the island against the Turks. The reason for lifting the siege of Malta is because of the martyrdom of Turgut chief who made the siege. If the commander had not been martyred, the island would have been taken. Truth hurts, you'll learn.

Imagine Bayezid as a child being tutored into mathematics and ending up hating math class so much that he swore to execute this mathematition.

I think his son poisoned him because he killed molla lutfi

Well said but one thing, sacking constantinople, people hating him? That's not right.

The cannons still didnt work. They had to sneak boats across a neighboring city into a harbor behind constantinople. Also they had a lot of infantry including slave soldiers (eunuchs) i forget the proper name. Constantinople didnt get reinforcements in time from Rome .

@@petej7002 The fact that the Byzantines no longer were Catholic, but Ortodox Christians probably were the main reason no one really wanted comeaid them in their hour of need. (Limited help came from smaller sources.)

don't worry, you will be forgotten. But Skanderbeg will live on. btw you spelled his name wrong, deuchbag

It wasn't in continuous wars they had peaceful times where they can rest

@Jordi Barcelona sí Jordi. Sí. Y de 25.000 soldados, sólo 5000 era italianos. The fact is that 1/3 of the fleet did not join the fight till the end. The Galeazas were inmediatly surpased , and the main factor of the victory was the spanish marine infantry, both in the center of the fleet, and in the venetian galleis.

Meglio gli spagnoli dei francesi

@@Chaiserzose aquí en Palma tenemos un barrio que se llama Génova ... se fundó en la eda Media. Otro es Son Sardin(i)a ha perdido la i... yo diría que casi somos familia.

this is before the tercios though.

@@magnusyarbrough5527 well, in fact to write " tercios" is shorter than write " the troops that later became the migthy tercios with brilliant commander like Fernando González de Córdoba who proved his value in tha war to take Granda when he started to master the arms combination of pikes, guns and artillery."