Also its called the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.

so much for the "good guys with guns" con-job the rightwing loves so much

@@merch_and_meme find a new talking point ...only a few politicians believe that not everyone.

Keep telling yourself that, nobody else believes your lies

@@merch_and_meme As a Conservative, I believe in law and order, so I want to fund the police, enforce the law, secure the border and prosecute criminals.

If you cared about kids you wouldn't support abortion which takes the lives of millions of small babies every year.

Children should be safe at school, so lets do that by making schools hard targets.

They don't, that's actually on the surrounding Community including Parents, Teachers, and School Administrators; but it'd be nice if that could be Guaranteed and Enforced as a Constitutional Right.

gun nuts are willing to sacrifice all of them in order to keep their ammosexual fantasies

From the GoP point of view that only true if the children is not born yet. After that they dont care.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n8uhp5yfvsvPm6s.html

most politicians are too old to have young children

This is why you need an ar kzfaq.info/get/bejne/isudg8xevZ-xhmg.html

@David Wang The second ammendment was created not for hunting, not for self defense, but to keep the public armed commensurate to that of the military incase if a tyrannical government. The founders were in favor of private citizens having artillery and any wepon available to the military.

@David Wang the founders were enthusiastic about the most new and modern weapons of the time there were guns that weren’t muskets that can shoot a decent amount of time in a minute. There were multibarreled guns, breech loading guns, and other types of weapons that the founder owned.

He also made open carry in California illegal because of the black panther party he is still anti 2a by his bigotry and hate🤷🏾‍♂️

protection from cnn

Vote them out 😠

The difference between "lawmakers" and the mob is that when you dealt with the mob you got your money's worth. You kept up your end of the deal, they kept up theirs.

Gun ownership is a constitutional right, they do a full background checks including the occasional conversation with the FBI for gun purchases! And I'm not paying somebody less qualified than me to certify me. If it requires a license then it's not a right! So borrowing the ridiculous stuff everything you ask for already exists.

Using your logic we should go ahead and require a full federal background check ID verification proof of address fill out a short form just a couple pages and don't worry if the FBI is going slow they'll get back to you within 3 days so you can vote. It's just the hurdles that someone goes through to buy a gun. Why not to vote? THAT'S YOUR LOGIC!

@@chain-breakingsageBackground checks and waiting periods are not required in all states. Oklahoma does not have a waiting period, nor are there mandatory background checks. The Oklahoma shooter purchased his 3 hours before the shooting. Each state has its own regulations. A waiting period may have given him some time to cool off, or given someone the opportunity to notice that something was wrong to stop him. If background checks were a requirement equally, why would lawmakers be discussing background checks right now? It is because it is not universal.

I agree with you 100%. I can’t buy a 22 without a back ground check in my republican state. I believe a waiting time for high powered rifles should be a law.

I agree with you , but when it comes to REPUBLICAN lawmakers it's comes down to them getting the money from the NRA. If the Republican politicians would stop getting paid off from the NRA , their votes and gun laws would make common sense. VOTE VOTE VOTE BLUE 💙💙💙🌊🌊🌊🌊

Just going to try and honestly answer your questions I'm not attacking you. First it should be said that AR15's have never been used in a war. The M16 is a similar looking weapon but it's not the same. So calling an AR a weapon of war is not accurate. 2nd the most common sporting event AR's are used in is called a "3 Gun" course where participants navigate and shoot three different guns those being a pistol, a shotgun and a rifle. The rifle used is usually an AR. As to varmint control the AR shoots the .223 caliber cartridge which is based on the .222 cartridge which was originally designed as a varmint cartridge. Today the .223 has taken over and is actually the most common cartridge used in varmint control.

It’s not about sporting. The 2nd amendment was specifically written to protect weapons of war.

@@growlikethewind5788 How many rounds can you shoot with a ar15 within a minute a serious question

@@jasonturner383 And you are still quite welcome to have an 18th century musket

@@growlikethewind5788 buddy with all due respect, because you are also respectful, my question is. Is it worth having guns so readily available, is it worth the lives that are taken by a gun. I agree it is not the guns. Here in Canada we are avid hunters, every one had a gun for shooting game, yet we do not have near the amount of violent gun crimes. The stats are clear. If you feel it's worth the lives of innocent children then I guess your going to have high gun crime and mass shootings.

If the age to carry arms is raised the age to marry, vote, and be drafted needs to be raised also.

It is 100% about taking guns from people. Learn history and stop trusting politicians.

Is renting a car constitutional right? we should also raise the voting age to 21 I think that's more important. And you shouldn't be able to join the military till you're 21.

Why do you have to be 25 ,to rent a car ,, because Thai what the people that own them want,it also makes Thier insurance premiums less, and 25 year olds are more experienced at driving , driving car ,and owning a gun has nothing to do with each other,car rental companies are out to may money, and need Thier cars return in good condition,

@@chasthanhburns123 completely agree! All those children dying from 19 year Olds getting married is a huge issue. All these other issues can by ALL means be discussed and debated at another time and place, but people have to be able to live to voting age to make it a worthwhile argument.

Guns don’t kill people. Psychos do. Run around with a Glock. No difference.

@@thomasjohn6041 You’re right. Both the AR-15 and the Glock only have one function, to kill people. It doesn’t matter who’s hands they are in, sane or psycho, that function doesn’t change.

@@georgenewlands9760 sane people don’t go around killing other people. So, yeah it does matter.

When the Constitution was penned private citizens could own a cannon, by law. Until 1938 felons could still own firearms. I think that's when they banned machine guns, as well, but that might have come a bit later. Whether they could afford it, or not, is an entirely different story. Furthermore, semi-automatic rifles are not weapons of war, or they are, depending upon what your definition of "weapon of war" is. For example, at one point on time weapons of war consisted of rocks and sticks and inn other times it was knives, swords, arrows and axes. During those times, citizens still had access to those same "weapons of war" for self-defense and hunting. Now, in today's time, no military on Earth uses the AR-15 in its arsenal, therefore the militaries of the world have deemed the AR-15 to not be a weapon good for waging war. I would say they're wrong, just on the fact that any weapon is better than no weapon, but that's just me. Lastly, to ban semi-automatic weapons would make every pistol, most revolvers and the majority of rifles illegal. Semi-automatic means the weapon, and yes it's a weapon, loads one round for every trigger pull and one round only. You can't just hold down the trigger and keep firing.

@@johnpatrick1647 actually no a regular Joe could not have weapons of war, these were designed for that specific, from swords to axes, to pikes it was illegal, but you could have hunting weapons and tools, these could be used for war, big difference. The AR 15 is the company name for the weapon, the military designation is M 16, their the same weapon.

It's illegal to hold such weapons in several countries, to have munitions in your possession is very serious by itself.

@@johnpatrick1647 So you are under the impression that 0 gun owners modify their AR-15? Ever heard of bump stocks? Hell, there are wheels you can put in the triggers to make them gattling guns.

@@JoaoSoares-rs6ecClose, but no cigar. The AR-15 is civilian model of the M-16 but they're fundamentally different in the fact that the M-16's lower receiver can be switched from semi-automatic to 3-round burst to full auto. The AR-15 has no such ability. It is semi- auto only.

Democrats support thugs having guns but not regular American citizens

No. No compassion, no morals, no ethics, no soul. All greed @GOP

No conscience

@Communication Failure7600 Why do you live in a black and white world--a zero sum game of multiple choice?

Are you forgetting he is a card carrying member of the gun party?

What about wild pigs that breed very fast.

no school shooting has ever occurred at a facility that allows teachers with CCWs to carry on campus. how about we try more of that?

if you want less guns in ppls hands this is what we need to do. Why do you need a assault rifle? If you don't, why do you need the right to own one? It's time for every registered Democrat to surrender their 2A rights and demand our Democrat leaders make it illegal for any registered Democrat not in law enforcement to own weapons of war. It will remove guns from half the nation saving countless lives. A step in the right direction, and in time the GOP will see it works and do the same. We must lead the way, we must do what we have been calling for, surrender your 2A rights, makes it illegal for our party members to own assault rifles and any weapon of war. Civilized ppl do not need archaic rights.

@@dude8223 its not called "THE BILL OF NEEDS" . its "THE BILL OF RIGHTS". so it doesnt matter what you think people need. their rights arent defined by your fears.

@Joel The democrats are voted against by the republicans everytime no matter how good it may be for us. For example why vote against the bill to have insulin cost only $35. No excuse. Pull your head out of the sand.

Then why is it always the Democrat Politicians trying to pass Federally Mandated Background Checks on Intrastate Firearms sales when everyone knows it's unconstitutional, only the States have the power to regulate intrastate commerce. It's a sick kind of smoke and mirrors show, make a big deal about trying to do something you know can't be done. You do remember the 10th Amendment right? Protecting the powers of the State, limiting the power of the Federal Government? Funny thing is that many States have already passed such laws requiring background checks on private sales. If these Democrats put half as much time and effort into passing such laws at the State level, it's be a dome deal. I'd vote for it in my State, but it never seems to be on the ballot? Why is that? Heck, it's almost as if those darned Democrats don't really want to enforce background checks on all firearms sales. It would make a guy think that maybe they own stock in some of these firearm manufacturers. A lot of those darned gun makers make real military weapons, you know, machineguns, not just replicas like AR15s that only shoot 30 rounds in a minuet, the real shit man, they shoot 600. And don't those Democrats like selling guns to other countries, like Ukraine, Kuwait, Honduras ? And no one ever accused them of starting wars, you know, like Hilary, cause we all watched Obama bring the boys home right? While we sent an assload of guns to Afghanistan and Iraq? And who are all these people who think their Democrats are such saints?

Oh yes, and I'll add, why to these Democrats want to ban the sale of body armor? Wearing Body Armor while committing a crime while armed with a firearm is an additional felony offense. But why would a criminal care? Who are we keeping from owning body armor? Felons, or law abiding citizens?

No voting for people under 21 either.

Almost EVERY gun is semi auto.

Everyone in the household has to approve of the person and pass background checks for anyone getting firearms also. Must take a firearms class. Must register all weapons in state and federal database.

Then what happens when a 21 year old commits a mass shooting?

Because banning drugs was such a resounding success!

Where did you get your ballistics degree from?

Great comment ! I love USA , married American live in Melbourne , Australia but these shoutings get bigger in atrocity and younger in age the massacre ! It’s heartbreaking , I made my own shrine in honour of those 19 children , 2 teAchers . I teach ballet / jazz to 10 yrs and up so I put myself in that school , I would never recover if I survived . Sending ships filled with. Love , hugs , common sense in politics ! Bless you 🙏

300 Blackout/subsonic ammo Problem mitigated Also, it was only one person, so don't take away the rights of millions of other law abiding people.

Who the hell did he piss off that he needs to protect himself from someone in his apartment?

LOL? When you are so ignorant on firearms, you think you can shoot 3 buildings down! LOL!!!! You are an expert in ballistics!!! Seriously not even joking!!

The U.S. Military took a oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution as did the President and Vice President. Law Enforcement took the same oath too. Set down...get back in your seat!

Don’t let anyone buy a gun that would guarantee mentally I’ll people wouldn’t have one

@@blaineboyle5997 mentally ill people would just either make a gun or make a bomb. A lot of people that are mentally ill or not stupid their insanely smart.

@@jeffreyburney6161 great argument

Pure horse$hit right wing NRA talking points. The root of the problem in the United States is THE GUNS!! How do you not see this unless you're avoiding looking at the real issue or ignoring the real issue? Broken record time but every country in the world has mental health issues with their citizens but don't have mass shootings every other week. Let's say we take your advice and concentrate on the mental health avenue and devote resources to that problem. How long do you think it would be before studies are done and plans are implemented and we possibly see some results? 10 years? 20? We know the signs to look for and every law enforcement agency has a protocol for dealing with mass shooting incidents. Schools in this country educate and train their teachers constantly about teaching their kids what to do in mass shootings. They even have drills. The problem is that you're just not going to stop a determined person armed with a frickin AR-15 with hundreds of rounds of ammo. The one thing we KNOW for a FACT right NOW is that mass shooters have used semi automatic rifles (AR-15) in 63 mass shootings since 1982 in the United States. In fact, semi-automatic rifles were featured in four of the five deadliest mass shootings, being used in the Orlando nightclub massacre, the Stoneman Douglas Parkland shooting, Sandy Hook Elementary massacre and Texas First Baptist Church massacre. If we know what weapon these offenders typically use the most, doesn't it make sense that we ban these weapons of war from public use, at the very least, until we get the mental health aspect under control? This makes so much sense that it's grossly iresponsible and bordering on criminal that we haven't banned these weapons.

There were plenty of cannons and grenades and warships lmao thats got to be at least the same as an AR15

Focus on the problem and that would be the criminal, thanks

Uhhh, none?

When the first amendment was passed were there any newspapers? Radio? Television? and Internet? Do the rights in the Constitution only apply to the 18th century?

In 1804 when Lewis and Clark came to Louisiana, they had a semi automatic rifle that held 47 rounds. The gun they had held alot more rounds than a 25 round AR15.

They'll oppose anything if it's going to mean losing money.

@@indio2935 and pissing off the insane and violent base they've cultivated.

Not only the well regulated militi, but that this was ratified in 1790 and the gun at the time was a MUSKET! Damn, I DESPISE Republicans who can't give a straight answer!! "It's their constitutional right to bear arms." This is getting OLD!

I love how when libs cannot effectively argue ..the RIGHT of the people....SHALL NOT be infringed....that they then try to make hay out of a meaningless preamble that changes NOTHING about the right of the people. Playing to their terminally ignorant base.

Oh look, another "constitutional scholar" parroting that same nonsense that they don't understand. Gosh, never seen THAT fault line of reasoning before.

if u look at the bigger picture, this is why republicans have been trying the hardest to defend school to keep Americans dumb af so they can be easily manipulated and vote republicans. also the dumber they are, the more guns they'll buy. grofit!

I dunno. I talked to several women who own a Firearm. They claim they are not giving up their firearms. They carry for protection when walking alone.

they "need" them BECAUSE they have mental health disorders, specifically paranoia and probably grandiose delusions with a god complex. They need to feel like they could be a hero one day.

I thought we kicked you Redcoats out in 1776 so we wouldn't have to hear your thoughts on anything any longer.

@Real Aiglon 😂😂😂😂😂 If Americans are so qualified in talking about guns. Why do you have the gun violence/deaths per capita than any other nations???

Oh geez another pog trying to ack like he knows something 😂

The 2nd Amendment wasn't made to protect hunters and you know that.

Weapons designed to kill humans are the reason the bill of rights exist in the first place. wtf are you talking about? *THAT* is the point. *To kill Tyrants!* Hunting is for people who like killing and has nothing to do with any rights discussed here.

@@sburgos9621 if the Russians or Chinese invade the U.S. They're dropping nukes not troops.

@@sburgos9621 The Second Amendment wasn't made to protect the people from the government or criminals. It was written as a way for the government to raise an army (militia) when they needed one as there was no standing army in the US when the Constitution was written. The 2nd was also a requirement by the southern states so that they could put together an armed militia to hunt down escaped slaves. Without the 2nd the slave states would not have signed onto the Constitution.

Are you still drunk? You actually think we haven’t been invaded by Russia or China because 32% of Americans own guns? I just erased half of what I typed because honestly it was just mean & I would probably be wasting my time because you are insane and/or wouldn’t know the meaning of most of the words I used. Unfreaking believable.

You just wish one of "who" ? could be honest ?

I guess over 60k defense uses a year of firearms is irrelevant to you...

that's literally just your opinion

The arguments have been made and SCOTUS has ruled on them. The second amendment is there for two reasons, as a safeguard against tyranny, and for personal self defense. Some people just don't like it but it seems many more do. The number of gun owners keeps growing and the number of States lifting restrictions keeps growing. No matter what you hear from the main stream media, no matter how doggedly the politicians try to pass unconstitutional laws, it's very clear. Gun control is dieing.

Maybe you want to vaporize the prairie dog lol

An ar isn’t really a high powered rifle. It’s made for killing small things like the prairie dogs you talk about, and rodents. Not that any of it matters cuz I don’t need a reason to own one.

@@Godlim17 Clearly you don’t know what a 5.56 round does. You’ll need something much more powerful to “vaporize” it. It’s crazy how people as ignorant to guns as you want to regulate them.

@@JustMaples You can kill a prairie dog with an airsoft gun I was making the point that it was overkill. I also was trying to be funny. My education or lack thereof has no bearing on the fact automatic and semi-automatic weapons were initially manufactured for war and they kill at rates meant to do so. If my not knowing everything about a gun makes you sleep better at night knowing harmless children have died more power to you.

@@JR3714 this logic of right to bear arms doesn’t make any sense and you are right.

Entirely correct. Although idk if you noticed, but there's a wacky interpretation of the 2A going around that says apparently, when it was written, it meant a civilian could own a cannon as well as a musket. Like ok Jimbo. I'm sure your average Continental enlistee could even afford that. The nerve of these ammosexuals...

I’d draw the line at Indiscriminate weaponry. something like nuclear, biological or chemical weaponry can’t be controlled. Mortars, artillery, rockets. Sounds awesome. Could never afford such, but would be a blast to use.

When the Gov Stood down in 2020 riots and allowed cities to burn, and police did nothing, you think the peple did not have the right to have arms to protect them selves. We stood as angry mobs headed towards our neighborhood, police did nothing, no militartry called, buildings cars destroyed... are we supposed to allow our gov to do nothing and accept it and remain defenseless... No.. we had at least 40 people armed with ar-15's, assault pepperball weapons surrounding our homes.... We needed them... The large invading hostile mob decided it was not worth the risk to enter out residential area and businesses because they saw the firepower and knew we could shoot more than 10 rounds at a time.... The second ammendment gives us that right... If we put our faith in our gov to protect us in 2020, we would have lost everything... but we have a second ammendment that kept us safe... Not 1 Rifle was raised.. we stood, guns pointed down.... I am glad you think the gov will protect you... but wait for the day when a mob is headed towards your family and home... you will wish you and your neighbors were trained and had weapons to take care of the situation !

@@robertwadas pretty sad state of affairs when you believe you need military weapons to live a peaceful life.......U S A! U S A!🤪👍

1799 was a long time ago. Do you need more targets, because outlawing abortion will have that side effect?

@@douglemay7989 🤣 you a mindless bot

@@ArizonaGuerrilla What part of the militia are you? DUH!

@@douglemay7989 why did u delete your other comment

Let's be Honest we knew kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8xkdt150dyyZWQ.html

I didn’t realize grifting off the right wing mentally challenged required an AR 15

Watch them on youtube fool!

He’s a goofball

Nobody 'needs' an AR-15

@@jools2323 THANK YOU!!!

I'm not 18, but I want one... I like the way some of them look.

I was given an M-60, M-16 A2, .45 ACP, and fragmentation grenades by the U.S. government when I was 17 years old. So.....

@@warrengoss7547 did the Army train you on responsibility with those weapons? Yes. Can't say the same for an 18 yr old purchasing an AR can you pal?

With the number of firearms in America it's a wonder there's any wild life left.

Prarie dogs are a problem if building townships on your land they destroy the grasses attract rattlesnakes and cattle and other livestock break their legs in the holes also prairiedogs carry the black plague. Their is a need to control populations but weapons for murdering in war is not necessary to control populations there is alot easier ways to handle the situation

@Jebus Hypocristos I agree and that's what I said also

Wild Hogs

They are available stupid!

Sounds good to me

.....RPG's are available to the general public

Somebody needs round up these loons , lock them up and throw away the key. Democrat = Domestic terrorist and National threat!

Without guns, it would be like South Korea In South Korea, the police are the king Men should bring money to the police Women should give a body to the police

Food shortage is coming this Fall as planned. Check out the following site

operation

disclosure

official

Lol yeah live under Trudeau's tyranny

Brilliant. In summary, America’s right is bat-shit crazy and has zero respect for human life when it doesn’t keep their pockets lined and power full filled.

@@Grimoire933 please give one example of living under tyranny

Good for you but I think I’ll pass martial law could be introduced at any moment and you’d be screwed. I don’t think it’s smart to put my safety in the government’s hands.

@@Chris-iv7pk No. They don't run our government. They put their hand in the back pocket of lawmakers so that they can subvert, twist our government.

🤣🤣🤣

@Teutonic Nordwind How did that work out when tRump was causing an insurrection? I didn't see many fighting his tyranny!

So....You can't do all that with a bolt action or pump or lever? You must be a terrible shot.

@@TJ-fe7rr it's easier to use a semi automatic rifle to do it than a fucking bolt action rifle

And they had threat of war on all sides. Now the threat is crime

So it should be weapons with less than 10 bullets.chemical weapons,electric stun guns, surprisingly sniper rifles, knives ,hatchets . Everything else banned unless they are against a foreign enemy such as Puerto Rico,American Samoa, Okinawa, Iraqui bases

No, the 2A was made for tyrants and the ones who enforce their laws

Seriously! Ar 15s that shoot multiple rounds needed to kill a small, 10 inch long rodent, … or small children.

Them prairie dogs don’t stand a chance 🙄

"Need" LOL... it's not about "Need". It's called the Bill of Rights... not the Bill of Needs.

@@chrismacdonald102 Nor do the kids those things shoot.

Let's be Honest we knew kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8xkdt150dyyZWQ.html

maybe.... it is possible.... but I think they still arent sure and need more that...

no civilian needs a car that goes faster then 75...that also seems to be a problem...also theres no need for a civilian to decide their diet and die from health related issues...thats also a problem...y dont u care about crash victims or over weight people? are they not people who deserve justice as well and do these people not die just as frequently as gun violence victims...seems like theres just as equally bad issues out there and ur not calling for reform on...why?? not informed? dont care? just forgot?

It is not a military weapon. Even if it were your comment makes no since when the right to a gun is to fight against an invading military.

AR-15 is a civilian rifle not military. Learn the difference

And if politicians use dead children to push their agenda they need to be out

A better education system, promotiong of family values, and more rigourous mental health help for kids 1-18 AND adults, could bring down shootings significantly. Every kid that shot up their school was not mentally okay.

which sports requires automatic assault weapons? is it basketball or baseball that requires it?

@@TheAllMightyGodofCod maybe that’s a question to ask Josh not me.

@I Am Retired don’t be so hard on yourself.

@@TheAllMightyGodofCod The right to a gun isnt for shooting as a sport or hunting it is to shoot humans in an invading army.

You can vote at 18 and RUIN a Country by your ignorant and careless mistake!

Probably because the Supreme Court ruled some time ago that the right to bear arms is not connected to militia service.

@@mr.bisley2748 Read the text: it's for people in the militia.

A bunch of half-cocked yahoo's running around with AR-15's shooting anything that moves does not constitute a well regulated militia.

The right according to the founding fathers was invested in the individual because in times of need the militia is the people. It only comes into play from people trying to ban guns who don't understand what the term means. In general, as you sort of show, liberals should have no say on guns.

That's because the founding fathers mentioned that specifically. At the time there wasn't a standing army. Now there is which is why the NRA only count the part after the comma. That's why cannons aren't in there as well. Constitutionalist will agree, however that doesn't play well for the gun lobbyists peace

So now you know what 150 million people think?

So Biden says a 9mm blows the lung out the body but he endorses shotguns for self defense? You know how much more devastating a shotgun blast is to a 9mm? These people try to make these laws and have no idea what they are talking about

That's rly all you need. ARs are over powered and too high capacity for "legitimate hunting purposes"💀

@diveunder neither does my DDM4V7 Pro.

@@isaaccuster4329 Only you mentioned hunting. the constitution mentions standing against a government.

YES.

No. Anyone can do 3 gun events. Pistols, AR, shotgun.

@@jaymass1178 are yoou serious? can anyone just say "bring your gun to the event"? thats just stupid i wouldnt feel safe as an obserer especially in the US with those loose gun laws

@@Maxcraft-1000 What? It's a gun competition! If you don't want to go don't. I could care less how you "feel". I carry everywhere I go. I feel perfectly safe.

Can we ask about the REAL payola from Big Pharma while were at it?

All 2 million that was divided between the Senate and House. The NRA is dead, we former members moved to other gun rights groups dedicated to the removal of all Federal firearms laws.

No they aren't. It's a single shot weapon, same as any handgun.

Why is traitor ...bunker baby seditionist #hitler ...josh holly still making laws for humans?? Just GO through the NRA donations to these Monsters!! And whats with #manchin and the coal donations??

Lol dude you are too ignorant to have a say. It's not a military weapon. Nor is it hard core.

@L Macdonald Stop spreading misinformation. If it is a military weapon then why doesn't the military use single shot AR's?

Keep this divisive culture war crap going and there's going to be an untrained civilian army on our streets real soon. Well, perhaps not so much an army as roving bands of maruaders.

Long gun

In what year was that?

@@jaymass1178 1939🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@12_3__i8 Haha. I think before that even. Lever action rifles started around 1837, pump action around 1887. Sure you can use a single shot still to this day, but who would?

@@jaymass1178 Of course! But I think it seems logical to offer a special Varmint permit to those who really need an AR to blow apart prairie dogs. Maybe they are useful to cull feral hogs, but not necessary for smaller critters.

The Supreme Court has already decided that the right does apply to private citizens

And even if it didn't what are you going to do with the millions of people that already have guns?

Agreed, it's a State right, not an individual right "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

@@AmericanpatriotforTrump Money trumps Constitution, eh?

@@AmericanpatriotforTrump The supreme court is wrong just like they are on alot of things are you for over turning Roe vs Wade?

Sadly, Will Joe hold this view tomorrow??? He flips and disappoints so frequently that you just can't take him at his word.

He won't support filibuster reform to make it happen, so he just lied to you.

Manchin is a two faced prick. He doesn't give af about anything except his mining business.

Like there's a buttload to choose from...

Let's be Honest we knew kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8xkdt150dyyZWQ.html

The govt is becoming more controlling and oppressive. Citizens have the right to bear arms because one day they will come for us

If they wanted “right to bear muskets” they could have said such. They said arms, pretty generic. They like us understand technology advances. There were already prototype weapons that could fire without needing to reload in between each shot. Expensive but they existed

Do you honestly think that “right for the free speech” was intended for the likes of Internet and Twitter when the free speech they refer was no where near the global level of today.

Yes.

@@The_SmorgMan yeah, they also thought coke was medicine and that children should work and eat radon. Grow up.

Same point I made too. So to those puzzling over it. Why is this?

Exactly, what are all these people so afraid of that they think they have to have guns, especially rapid-fire ones.

When you need a gun to defend your own home, you are living in a broken culture. In a war zone, yes. If not, you live in fear and that's sick.

Um 2020 Chicago, Police ordered not to stop hundreds burning cars and buildings heading towards us as police watched... Yea.. it sucked knowing our own gov would not help, it sucks that we do need these weapons to survive, it sucked it took 40 of us with ar-15's to deter an angry mob from entering our area... but that was our only option.. Sucks but it is a reality in Chicago ! The gov let them destroy anything they wanted... Us armed citizens didn't

@@Madmen604 sad truth but reality none the less. Its better to have the means to defend yourself and what’s important to you than to be at the mercy of those who intend to do you harm. It’s been that way for the longest.

u sound like a complete goofy.

Leave you don't need to be here move to Canada or something

It's the militia that should be regulated, not the people.

@@jpm5243 anyone that claims the right to bear arms.

Oh, it's not all what you think. Most of the laws proposed by the House and being drafted and voted on, they are not even constitutional, they won't fly. They are just doing tap dances playing stupid games for the ignorant. I'm not attacking you or your ideas Jennifer, but the Constitution limits the Federal Government's Power, and the 10th Amendment makes sure it's clear, the Federal Government does not have the power/authority to regulate the private sale of anything, firearms included, between citizens of the same State, Intrastate Commerce is a State power. And while all other forms of firearms purchase require a background check, and while many States require it even for Private Sales, the Feds can't do it, so why do they keep trying? They could easily spend the money to encourage the States to make it happen. So while I see opportunities to legalize pot, same sex marriage, etc, on the Ballot every few years, I never see background checks for private sales in my State. Could it be that the Democrats don't really want it, that the status quo suits them just fine? Keep taking money from the NRA and Firearms Lobby, and Money from big Pharma for all the mental health issues related to substance abuse, homelessness, all of our woes. Talk big about the terrible AR15 and do nothing.

@@jpm5243 The people are the militia. Ukraine had mostly civilians, after they were attacked, everyone fit to fight was fighting the enemy. They became the militia.

@Stuck ‘n’ Stoned 1828 Websters Dictionary. REG'ULATED, participle passive Adjusted by rule, method or forms; put in good order; _subjected to rules or restrictions_

@@merch_and_meme As he mentioned: Which advantage would an AR15 give you over a, say bol-action rifle?

Right? Why would anyone even need a firearm with more than 1 round?

Didn't matter. The AR15 is not the problem. You can do just as much damage with a 22 handgun. Control is the issue. Control and the stupidity of voters that keep voting in idiots like Cruz, Greene, and Trump.

@@boost77071 if you knew anything you would know that ar style rifles are used in self-defense more than any other firearm. That's why we need more than one shot

@@MistedMind ar 15 style rifles is the most common rifle used in self-defense. Tell me what you would rather have in a home invasion situation a bolt action or a semi auto rifle?

With our failings in the educational system in the US, we don't have as many citizens here that understand statistics. Good try, though.

@diveunder If his name is an indication: Australia - 1997

What country?

I think your numbers are inflated. Take out suicides and crimes with handguns. Then what do you get? No one in the US cares about foreign opinions on our constitutional rights. Sorry you have none

The relationship between gun deaths and mass gun ownership in a population has been proved statistically. There is no other explanation for Americas totally excessive deaths by gun.

Yes, the NRA lobbyists who give them piles of money.

The militia is the people

@@dick8997 in defense of their state or their country

@@dick8997 and this isn't about honorable well-trained responsible gun owners. It's about everyone who isn't.

Why do people think that just because an AR5 can have a 30 round mag, that they can't also have a 5 round mag? And why do you think a hunting rifle that normally has a 4 or 5 round mag, can't also have a 30 round mag? The only difference between AR15s and other semiautomatic firearms is that they are modular, configurable. You can change out an AR15 from .223cal to .300 Blackout or 350 Legend or several other calibers in a minute without tools, many use the same magazine. And no you have a rifle with very different ballistics. You can change your rifle from a plinker shooting .22LR, to a varmint rifle shooting .233, to a deer rifle shooting .350 Legend, to a defense rifle in .300 Blackout. Furthermore, our State National Guard and Reserve Component forces are not militias, the people are militias. If the thinking of the framers was that only our Military, controlled by the Government, needed a right to keep and bare arms, then what was the point of a Right being laid down to begin with? Explain how you think that was the logic behind it, that only Government "well regulated" militias should have firearms, so we need to enshrine that in the Bill of Rights, which protects the rights of the citizenry? But while I can easily speak to why people like the AR15 so much, and why you are completely off base about the meaning of the 2A, I must also explain more of the obvious. That the 2A was written to ensure that the People would be able to resist an oppressive government, our government, not just foreign governments. The fact that our government continues to try to disarm our people is proof of exactly why the 2A exists. There is nothing nefarious about the bill of rights, or the nd Amendment. Guns don't kill people, people kill people, with or without guns. And long ago people figured out better ways to kill large numbers of innocent people without using guns, so exactly what are you thinking you will accomplish? If you really want to fix this problem, then actually deal with it, and help keep families together and strong, make sure children grow up with good values in safe secure homes, learning how to treat other people. Do this and you'll have fewer young people going off the rails and doing these things. And keep thinking that getting rid of firearms or restricting their ownership is going to fix the problem because as soon as firearms are no longer available, they'll rediscover just how easy it is to just use fire or some simple chemical combinations for a toxic gas and then you'll see a scale of tragedy that makes these shootings pale in comparison. You really need to stop thinking that an inanimate object is the problem or that eliminating it is the solution.

you don't spray and pray with a semi auto. One trigger pull one shot. The vast majority of ARs are .223 caliber. It's a big 22. They are light weight, low recoil and a small round that can reach out 200 yrds. Perfect for varmints.

AR15s aren't a "automatic rifle'.....U.S. Military M16/M4s are.

Lewis and Clark had 25 shot repeating rifles back 300 years ago. Look it up in the history books

Well trained it means, not limited. It means good working order.

@@cajunstacker1376 The expedition was in 1804, that's 216 years ago, and those repeating rifles were lever action repeating rifles, not semiautomatics.

Owning a gun is a privilege not a right 2nd amendment is outdated!

Nothing is absolute, especially the 2nd Amendment!

Read James Madison. He was a Virginian who wrote the Amendments. The well regulated militias were to run down escaped slaves besides, our 18th century ancestors were using muzzle loaders

Hahaha --- Keep coping, it's not going to change in this lifetime or the next.

@@indianapublicland7429 Your 1st is outdated. Goodbye.

They have a very limited amount of time w/ them. Usually moving. Also if you aren’t too hateful you gain lots of inside tips & off the record insights which are very valuable. Nothing “these journalists” inside government buildings are going to be able to beat coherent answers from those who choose not to give them. Meanwhile the montage of ridiculousness is enough for everyone out there who get the ridiculousness. I don’t expect a reasonable answer from the Hawley’s or Thunes of the world cuz it’s never going to happen BUT I absolutely enjoy what I get which is perpetual BS.

That's a false.

How is a Stricter Law going to PHYSICALLY stop anyone? A Criminal is a person caught AFTER they committed the crime. They already did what they wanted to do.

Ar 15's shoot 556 which is a 22lr bullet with a point and more powder behind it