More videos like this plssss !! Nicely explained this .. btw

will do! and thanks :)

+Aidan Andrewson thank you for the kind words :) i'm happy you enjoyed it!

Clearing that up took up precious energy from the universe.

Entropy is not disorder. Just google entropy is not disorder. Love your videos though!!!

​@@upandatom E =mc•2 c = √E/m s = vt **** t=s/v ................................. s= d =dimention v=c =velocity t = time .................................. so... *** t = d/ √E/m ................................... Therefore, as long as the values ​​d ., E , m must always be positive, then t must be positive. It can never be zero or negative. Therefore. Time only moves forward in one direction, there is no stopping or going back because dimension/energy and mass must always be positive.

When Australian throws a banana, it comes back.

I have studied this all my life. One of the ideas of baryonic complexity increase is the same as a local plateau. In a graph we see the complexity increase thus decreasing entropy. We do not know the base line of the increase, and hence we can not see the entropy increase of complexity accelerating entropy. Think of it this way, baryonic complexity here on earth drives us to use more and more energy. The Dyson sphere of enclosing a star would be complex, however in a longer term does this not maximize entropy events? A forest is organized, a match can reduce it to a state of much greater entropy. We burn the forest in a complex stove, one tree at a time. Stars organize matter, and reduce molecules, atoms to plasma. What do you think of this idea?

@@charleediaven6278 I think the most important aspect is that any trends towards reduced entropy are always localized and do not represent the overall trend towards entropy. At the end of the day, no matter how much we see localized organization, heat death is inevitable and there is simply no escape from entropy as a whole. The localized regions of reduced entropy are interesting, however, because they would seem to coincide with regions of increased dark matter density that likewise create the nodes of increased baryonic density throughout the universe. As for the whole issue of "driving us to use more energy", I think that's nothing more than a management issue, to be brutally honest. We humans have decided, for the most part, to live as though there were no sustainability constraints. Were we to take on a fundamentally different approach, our consumption of resources and, therefore, energy would be dramatically reduced compared to current trends.

+Vishal Parmar thank you! I'm happy you like Time, it's a really cool topic and I have fun learning more about it :) How do you like Electronics? That's kind of physics right? I took an electronics subject during my undergrad and it had a lot to do with electrons and moving charges, which I really liked. Although I was never really good at the hands on stuff. And if it makes you feel better, I did a physics degree and it did have A LOT of math.

Yeah well what I am studying is a 3 year diploma course in Electronics & Telecommunications. We had Physics in the first year (2 Sems of 6 month each) but it had most of basic stuff. What I study now is mostly circuit designing of various communication equipment's, mobile phones, PLCs etc...

Nearly there!!

Three years later, she deservedly has more than 240 times that many.

And now 319K!

It's possible. But it's much more likely that the universe reaches maximum entropy before that. Once maximum entropy is reached, there is no way back.

Ya there is a theory that there could be 3 ways our universe end.

Keep it in your pants mate... she's married.

Keep it in your pants mate... she's married.

+Carboxysome haha yyyyyup

+Max Planck thank you! ps cool KZfaq name btw

Yes. To say "you'd have to roll the dice 46,656 times to get" all sixes is a complete misunderstanding of what probability is. The dice could all be six on the first roll or never. Every combination has exactly the same chance of coming up and the chance is 1:46,656.

It can’t be going down now. A cold cup of warms up at room temperature because the entropy of the universe increases. That of the cup sees its temperature increase and the rest of the universe, other than the cup, sees its entropy decrease. Overall though the entropy increases. A warm cup of coffee’s entropy decreases at room temperature, whereas that of the rest of the universe increases. Here too the overall entropy increases. It always does.

haha now you've got a scientific excuse for mum ;)

+Hassan Selim haha I'll make sure to check it out!

Thank you! I'm glad you enjoyed it :)

lol thanks mum

Time could be both a standing wave and a multidimensional particle.

Oh, and in case you're willing to devote more to the channel than you already do, might I suggest looking into better sound equipment? Good content is definitely the most important thing, but since you already checked that off the list, a better mic could do wonders for a more pleasant and more professional video. Now there's quite a lot of echo from the walls.

+OytheGreat thank you for the kind words! I'm just gonna keep making videos as best I can. Funny you should mention the sound, my new microphone just arrived in the mail yesterday! A few people were saying the audio wasn't great so I saved up and got a good quality mic. Hopefully you'll be able to tell the difference in the next video :)

What does it mean when the girls in the bar get younger and prettier with each drink you take?

Travell Criner

+Nuclear Punch thanks for the support :)

It means the same thing. The second law of thermodynamics is reversible in that sense. All it’s saying is that forwards in time means the same thing as increasing entropy so yes, backwards in time means decreasing entropy. It all still works.

+Hayden Payne thank you :) what else do you like to think about?

miss physics Space and the physics of it are always fun. Black holes, wormholes, the big bang and multiverse theories are some of my particular favorites. Thanks again!

First, the number that comes up on a dice roll has absolutely nothing to do with entropy. They are just plastic in the shape of a cube; the side that faces up is inconsequential in regards to entropy. The way they roll is in a chaotic way, which fits in directly with the second law as mentioned in the video. So, the game of Yahtzee is entirely unaffected by/unrelated to entropy (beyond how literally everything else in the universe is affected). Second, the chances of rolling all 6s shown in the video is not representative of the odds for getting a Yahtzee. To start with, there are only five dice in Yahtzee, not six (so, at worst, the odds would be 1/6^5, not 1/6^6). However, even that doesn't tell the full story, because you get to roll three times AND you are able to set aside numbers you want from each roll. These two aspects increase the odds dramatically. The end result I came up with is that the odds of getting a Yahtzee are roughly 0.7%. That is just on one turn, though. When looking at how many turns you get to attempt it (13 turns to fill in all the score slots), the odds go up even more for getting a Yahtzee in an entire game. So, if you attempt a Yahtzee every turn (unlikely if you are actually trying to win, since you need a couple straights on the scorecard), you will have over 9% chance to get Yahtzee in a game (clearly much better odds than 1/6^6). I don't intend to lay out all of the math to get that result, but the method is this: calculate the probability of every single eventuality that leads to a Yahtzee and add them all together. For instance, getting no 1s on the first two rolls then all 1s on the third roll, getting all 1s on the first roll, getting three 1s on the first roll then one on the second roll then one on the third roll, etc. Of course, this must be for every number (so after calculating all the possible variations for one number, multiply by 6).

+Aditya Khanna1) Yes it does affect the psychological arrow of time. I was actually going to make the video about this but the idea was pretty complicated and went into information theory and I didn't have time to fully comprehend it myself, much less make a video about it! I may make one in the future if it one day clicks because it's such a fascinating topic. I would love to do more videos on the Arrow of Time! Thanks for asking :)

Hawking radiation - its a whole chapter on blackhole thermodynamics. This has yet to have been elucidated, so if you're an aspiring theoretical physicist spend your life obsessing over this and earn yourself a Nobel prize.

blackholes are actually a result of entropy! clumpiness in the universe is actually entropy increasing because it's the opposite of a smooth, uniform density, which would be a very low entropic state.