@Open Minded you're absolutely right

When we're in a prison without walls, there is zero escape, let alone to hope for it.

Yeah yeah it is like that cause it's trump the president.. if it was obama it would be ok.... lol

THIS A MAN??? Yes, it is important.

what do you have to hide? who are you going to assault? which store will you break in to, lazy person? 😎

100% innocent. Until proven.

Gregorius Giovanni most ppl (me) only think about the convenience, or how accurate it is. I never before now thought about how the technology could be used to potentially discriminate against me or target me. Then there are other ppl that feel this would only be a concern to terrorists and such but the speaker clearly indicated some opposing food for thought.

@@MiVidaBellisima Yeah, that's why it sad.

Wrong

It's even more sad that it won't be listened to either. I'm afraid the development is impossible to stop. Because a large majority of people don't care/understand

It is so sad cause the government is on right wing hands... if it was on the left.. it would be ok right?

Joshua Iwueze love scam i guess? 😬

CHINA IS A COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP, AMERICA IS A DEMOCRACY WHERE PEOPLE HAVE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. SURVEILLANCE CAMS ARE SIMPLY A TOOL. ACCORDING TO YOUR FLAWED LOGIC WE SHOULD DO AWAY WITH PRISONS, POLICE, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SIMPLY BECAUSE COMMIE CHINA ALSO HAS THEM

@China Expat : America has never been a democracy. That is a bold faced lie that has been told to us by our oppressors.

Many people do. The current Democratic platform, of which millions agree with, want our country to mirror China in many ways. We are in grave danger, but no one seems to care.

Lmao well said

Skynet.

Samaritan operatives

It's a nice sentiment, but the ship has already sailed. There's no putting this Genie back in the bottle.

Bootlickers

If I am disability I don’t have to pay 💰 tax + I don’t have much time in this life anyway? Maybe?

Twisted Humor / I don’t have to pay tax I Am on disability..

Brian Tunzi thats not a flex lol

@@nah3375 9:31 If one murders a baby in taxpayer funded privacy butcher shop, or does govt assisted kidnapping for control or money, it's still a crime that should result in prison. No immunity for feminists. Judgment Day will come.

Ben Franklin was smart that why put "essential" in that quote. Giving up non-essential liberty for safety is sometimes wise, and those who do not do might end up with neither liberty nor safety.

@@myothersoul1953 Not giving up non-essential liberty will never lead to a loss of liberty. It could lead to the loss of safety but at least you would have the ability to defend yourself in a hypothetical dangerous environment. Privacy rights are essential tho.

@@derrickg5612 Hypothetically many things could happen. That's why we should deal in reality and not some extreme imaginary slippery slope scenario. If the police were sometimes allowed to use face recognition doesn't mean they will put a camera outside of AA meetings to see who is attending. If they did people should start asking the police some hard questions and voting for different representatives.

@@myothersoul1953 You just posed a hypothetical scenario to me, but in that scenario, I could see police officials easily justifying cameras outside of AA meetings. We need to know where the alcoholics are... for your safety. Once a government attains a certain power it doesn't like to give it up. That's the reality of the nature of people in power.

@@derrickg5612 Just because the police could come us with a justification doesn't mean it would or should be accepted. They should need a warrant. We should not allow the state to put up cameras up without good cause. But we don't need to ban cameras to do that. We should not allow the police to track people without good cause. That's true whether they use credit cards, cell phones signals, face recognition software, face recognition brainware or any other technology. Banning face recognition software won't solve the bigger problem. Solve the bigger problem and face recognition software won't be a problem.

Just because different people talk about problems we, as humanity should solve responsibly, doesn't mean we're all doomed. The world is not all butterflies and rainbows. We have important topics to discuss and ignoring that becomes part of the problem.

@@TheKeule33 I agree. And it is important to discuss them in a reasonable and level headed way. We should make every effort to avoid things like confirmation bias and bad reasoning. For example logical fallacies, the slippery slope fallacy. See if you can spot it in the video above. I think it is around the ten minute mark.

But it can be killed. It may have 9 lives but god damn it, it can be killed.

It's already being implemented around the world! Thank God she gave this lecture to bring the topic more into the forefront, though. Social credit/conditioning is also much easier to pull off with this technology.

And we are paying them to do it.

There's no assumption of privacy on public property. If you want to stop it, you have to privatize all publicly owned property.

Yeah the government, especially the CIA, fund places like MIT in order to get them to develop technology strictly for them. And then over time, they allow this technology to be sold to the public from private companies. An they are very deliberate about what and when they choose to release. They have very specific goals in mind for allowing this tech out there. For example, the Navy creates the deep web,or dark web, so they could communicate without being traced. But they realized anyone who accesses the network would know anyone else on there was military. So they released it to the public so they could remain anonymous, but also to encourage other clandestine groups to use the technology, giving them a false sense of security using a system that they created. The same is true of smart phones and social media. They don't create everything themselves, but they do boost the things they want to be popular, like Google. Take a look into Google's creator and who he has ties to and how he got off the ground. It isn't organic at all. Many of those people involved have ties to intelligence and Israel. And KZfaq is linked directly from the same people. And once those people are turned into billionaires, if some technology does manage to organically pop up, they just buy it and adapt it to their needs. It's pretty sickening really.

@August Greig : I was thinking you had something valuable to say, until your antisemitism gave away your true intent.

@@augustgreig9420 your whole comment can be summarised into "i hate jews"

@@aylbdrmadison1051 Please tell me what I said that was antisemetic? I never even mentioned Jews.

@@abcdxx1059 Okay, this has to be trolling. Please tell me what I said that was antisemetic? I never even mentioned Jews.

I question anyone who so blatantly refuses to elaborate. So unless you care to do so, your comment carries no weight.

Aylbdr Madison I question anyone who doesn’t care to Google yet questions.

@@aylbdrmadison1051 Well I had to search it because I had no idea. I found that it is lingo associated with "elite" and hackers.

Allen Bao Ever heard of DuckDuckGoing it (a Privacy Based Browser) as an alternative to Googling it?

Nova Cynthia Arts yes I have and.....?

Hahaha!

You Funny Funny ;)

Thanking you now, ...and later.

2x is way too fast but 1.5 is perfect

This is true however the pauses allow you to abosorb what the person is saying amd think about all of the important parts. Its important to stay captovating to keep the attention so the listener gets all of the information. Its a psychological thing and its just good public speaking. This is just me but I much rather the speaking to be dramatic as you put it than a bland reading of all the info. At that point I might as well just read the script that they provide myself

Adella Malbrough, AND I’m trying to fight the modern pressure to hurry, hurry, hurry. Slowing down to listen has been a good discipline for me. I gotta admit though, I do like to fast forward and hit 2 podcast in the space of one!

It's a lady..lol

it's a woman

It's a non-binary female...I guess!

Check out Fight for the Future call your Congressman.

Don't willingly give up your privacy. Boycott companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, etc. Inform your friends and family about what's going on. The other commenter here said to write your Congressman. But Ralph Nader taught me that doesn't really work. What we have to do is band together. Find a group of about 1,000 or more people in your district and get them organized. Organize online, spread the word, get people informed. Then you start holding rallies in real life and recruit from there. You only need to start with about 25 people in order to grow to 1,000. Once you have the real physical numbers, then you go to your local Congressman's office and confront him there. Don't be hostile. Explain to him or her that these issues are extremely important to you, and if they are unwilling to do anything about it, then you will be forced to vote for someone who might actually listen. Record the interaction and upload it to social media. Use their own weapons against them. Get the word out. Writing letters is fine, but it rarely changes anything. Some intern is reading them and throwing most of them away, or sending a generic response letter with a signature which may or may not be basically rubber stamped on. But when 1,000 voters show up at the Congressman's office, that gets their attention. Remember that most of these people are whores. Yes, they love money, and that's why lobbyists have so much pull. But what're all of those campaign contributions for? To get votes. See, we have the power to cut out the middle man. We are the voters. We are the reason they raise all of that money, in hopes of persuading US. So when they see 1,000 people willing to show up and confront them, they assume there are many more who feel the same way who didn't show up. When they know they're being filmed, they're going to be very careful with what they say. And when they know you are coming back again next week, I can promise you that they're going to do their homework so they can have a better answer for you next time. This has always been Nader's strategy, and he's gotten more accomplished for the American citizen than any other private citizen in history, and arguably more than most politicians. From safety regulations for workers, seat belts in cars and the single most important thing he ever achieved, the freedom of information act or FOIA, and many more which are too numerous to mention. Nader's strategy just works. So if you're serious about wanting change, that's the best way I've ever seen it done. And I'm more than willing to help. I live in Louisville, Ky.

Not possible unless you're willing to throw your cell phone in a lake.

Bearly Listening I’ve done that ! 😂

@Bearly Listening : I use DuckDuckGo with little to no problem as a search engine. It is our laziness and apathy that got us here in the first place. As far as cell phones go: 25 years ago things were generally much better, and in no small part due to the fact that very very few people even had cell phones.

Weekend Warrior OMG your right lmao

I think you will find it is 2020. How was the coma? We taped it for you.

@@angrytedtalks Lol! You do know they are referring to George Orwell, right?

@@angrytedtalks wooosh Sorry, I just had to do it in this case

@@viktorg6823You know "We taped it for you" was also a reference to Big Brother?

I'm 100% positive my GPS is never on except when I choose. Admittedly there's a lot of menus/apps and settings you must go through in your phone and in Google system settings themselves multi tier no less😐 (takes me over an hour on a new device).. so I understand where yr coming from.

Yes! Finally an issue we can all agree on! Thanks, Kade. Good talk.

The power seekers of the world will _"say"_ anything to keep and gain even more control over us.

@@aylbdrmadison1051 It isn't power seekers in this case, it is paranoid protectionism, endorsed by authoritarian judgemental self righteous folk. We all want a degree of protection, to prevent crime and catch criminals. The paranoia that AI is flawed is justified up to a point, but it should be a part of reasonable law enforcement. That's the balance, though, isn't it? Reasonable...

.. and I am leaving opposing it.

Okay... So the person giving the talk says the government won't work according to their own rules? I live in central Europe and here it very much works like that - the government wants to use information they have on someone, so they have to ask a judge to be allowed to do it. The success rate of such a petition is nearly 100 percent because the agencies involved know exactly in which cases they are allowed to use it.

there's a difference between you have it on your private property (with no connection to the internet, or at least not uploading to the government) and government have it everywhere. Sure, when the government turns totalitarian, it will install the cameras anyway, but the extremes aren't the only possibilities.

I imagine our corporation/government had a hand in removing that.

Google wants to sell your facial information or other visual data. Then Bic will have pop-up ads for razors when it looks like you need to shave [without telling you that you are scruffy looking], Flintstones Vitamins will announce hang-over strength Gummies because the bags under your eyes are ALWAYS worse on Saturday and Sunday morning. And the pizza & beer special you ordered via delivery the night before confirms a lot... After a bit, clothing ads, tailored to how you look for each season start showing up. Funny how Ross always knows your color in the adverts! Just by some careful examination of trends over time, a persons life could be easy to read.

Y u assume there's only two genders :v

She