True bro

Love the way u talk,ur logics. Where r u from? Would like to connect with you. How can I?

Jo hindu Upanishads hai usme guru aur shishya ke beech jo sawal jawab hua hai woh likha hai. Bad mai logo ko aasan language mai maz aaye iske liye story form banaya. log dharam follow kre issliye devo/god ki concept aaiye. Agar log adharam ke tare kese jiye tho accha nahi hoga.

🤣🤣🤣.

😂😂😂

Yes

😂😂😂

well, atheism is quite flexible so you don't have to be rigid about your thoughts and can be open about ideologies. So Hindu atheism makes sense to me

And Vedas have themselves raised a question on god haven't they 😅. Do Hindus today have the guts to do that . Can they question the narrative that society has set ? I guess no. In this case they should learn from their own text how to question lol

I've tried reading Hitchens's book. But his writing is not as good as his speeches

Who knows. Press bell icon maybe?

@@scienceisdope His writing is very reference laden. Maybe that is why.

@@scienceisdope I prefer Richard Dawkins to Hitchens but maybe its cause I found his work, especially The God Delusion, to be very accessible as a layman.

yea true but don't call them religious they are mostly anti god

Testo haina bhai Different scenarios,conditions hunxa Taile vaneko pani kunai case ma thik hola

Yes of course not everyone thinks like that but a lot of people do

Hindu atheists aren't people who give themselves that tag because they become atheist to look cool or hippie. That's a complete misunderstanding of the phenomenon.

Brother may you give me what arguments persuaded you most for atheism in points

​@@pauldirc.. middleman arguement

There will be another enlightenment in your journey once you will realize where hitchens was coming from. The arguments he made are not unique at all and can only make sense to a world confined by abhrahamic thought. You will know one day that that atheism isn’t necessarily the same

@@thepassingpawn I may not everything he said but his arguments of religion are very logical

@@rahul27668 absolutely. But those are simply “duh” arguments specially for those who are eastern religion followers. I dig sam harris more tho

do u vote for bjp?

@@DistantDreamer892 no

@@ApoorvSaurabh who do you vote then is it Congress?

@@kjaideep no CPI

How is that even a question?​@@DistantDreamer892

Can you define the word "Hindu"?

​@@spuriusscapula4829 hindu is not a religion, this is a geographical demarcation, this word coined by thousands of years a ago by Greeks who came to the Indian subcontinent for trade.

​@@spuriusscapula4829 bro read history, Aj ke londe cool banne ke liye santan deities ko gali dete hai disrespect karte hai

Nirishwarbaadi is Non theist not Atheist

And the brhmn that they talk about is definitely not the creator diety Brahma-dev that theistic Hindus talk about right ?

Thanks Deepankar!

Even druv rathi. I don't get who is an hindu atheist. Calling himself an Indian atheist makes more sense.

Who said he doesn't question vedas or karma or anything? I've followed him very long and he had clearly said many times he doesn't believe in any of them because they don't have scientific validity

@@ayushkumarsinha9959 Then why he calls himself as Hindu ?

Read more!

I know. This video, was about Charvak appropriation. I will get to the other schools one day. Stay tuned.

@@vimoh oh ok. Actually I found some more Atheistic schools. The Ajivika school, The Grammarian school, the Medicinal school.

they dont fit into his agenda ,thats why he hasnt talked about them

@@vardhanarya 😂😂 👌👌👌

You can call yourself a hindu athiest but in todays sense it is oxymoronic. Yes hinduism has athiestic school of thought. Also charvakas are also mentioned in bhirandikya upanishad.

Who are Pansare and Kalaburgi ?

Caste discrimination for the most part will die within the next few decades.

​@@arjyachatterjee6874Anti Kusongskar activists

Hindu athiesm means a person who don't believe in god but live his life with some moral ethics. So I revomment you that know before talk.

@@mr.anonymous7114 Moral ethics? What moral ethics?

@@mr.anonymous7114 Being a theist or atheist has no relation with having ethics or morals, it strictly relates to believe or disbelieve in the existence of God. The existence of god or following religion is not a measure for judging morals. If you read enough you'll understand the morality in religious books are more screwed.

Nope athiestm means you just don't believe in God that is it... Religion can also be based on athiesm Yes hindu athiest are fuelling radical hindutva which is problematic and dangerous for democracy you are right with this thing. I am non hindu by the way...

Wikipedia compiles the definition of religion as : Religion is usually defined as a social-cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that generally relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements; however, there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion. So, If Hinduism is a religion and religion is defined as such and If such socio-cultural and other elements from a wide spectrum of elements of the Hindu society of India are still a part of our lives then we may very well be a Hindu-Atheist/Hindu-Agnostic-Atheist

Bro there is no exact time they are just assuming 😂😂

Hindu word is farsi gali

@@sorenutpal6091 hindu has come from Word Sindhu it has no relation with farsi

@@himanshunagarwal1019 true

what?

No it's not that... Hinduism is a way of life not a philosophy... Hinduism is a culture not an ideology.... Hinduism supports polytheism, monotheism, atheism and agonism .... So you can be a Hindu atheist

@@shubhamswaraj1557 the most generic whitewashing

@@shubhamswaraj1557 so ur saying that hinduism is not a religion but a set of different cultures and religions?

@@hey0173 yeah , I think so . It's a cultural identity for me , not my faith

@@glkglkglkglk9193 read more!

The thing that protects me is India being secular. Not your religion. If the Constitution didn't grant me safety, you guys would have comitted the same kind of violence people in Islamic states do.

​@@vimoh Please sir make a video on Sharia-Bolshevism. I found a Reddit channel and found this interesting and want to know more about it. I think as an Atheists we should popularise this concept

​@@vimoh I know it will be little political but just for curiosity

@@vimoh Mocking your own religion seems like being immature lol

​@@vimohthats a lie. Many Indian muslims have been beheaded for being ex-muslims or announcing that they don belive in allah. So yeah its sanatan who keeps u alivs as an atheist not secularism

If you say Hindu.. you already believe in God. Cuz you come in varna system and your varna came from God itself

​@@y1.5 Varna system alone cannot define a person is Hindu or not. Philosophy of Indian subcontinent is Hinduism, previous generation changed the name of philosophy to "Hinduism", Current generation believes in scientists and disagrees with some part of religios practices but like to follow as a part of their forefather's culture and to maintain unique traditions for future generations Bcoz extreme Atheism is boring.

​@@y1.5 hindu philosophy predates varna.

​@@y1.5varna is in manusmriti wgivh we clearly know were written by brahmins under kings. It was given authority by saying its gods word even tho its not. This is why caste system was banned and was accepted by guru and rishi as well. Rishimunis whomwrote veds did not write about varna.

​@@y1.5varna system was a political move

It's fun but not very deep. And Dawkins doesn't really get philosophical positions.

@@vimoh lol im starting with it today

@@vimoh it was actually meant to be read by teens as said by Dawkins

@@Pinkparasite True. But why would someone assume teenagers won't understand philosophy?

@@vimoh perhaps to connect with a global audience which wants things in more simplified manner rather than intricate and deep.and he might have a bias that teens usually don't get the philosophical views !

None of the ones you mentioned are Hindu philosophies. They were Vedic philosophies. There was no Hinduism then. Hence, for Hinduism to claim them is appropriation.

@@vimoh That is an intriguing perspective. How do you define Hinduism?

@@vimoh by your logic why call it Hinduism, how did you gave it that name , hindu word is given by someone else , so don't play with terms we all know all those philosophies were there and it's funny how you are trying to abrahmize deliberately or I don't know, trying to prove a binary and separate ot from sanatan philosophy

@@rakeshbarman3486 Who cares where the name came from. All I care about is what it means now.

@@rakeshbarman3486 dont believe these goons forign funded delusional and propagandists person.

Advaita vedanta is more philosophical and rational and talks about the metaphysical nature of reality. Also has had a strong atheistic tradition. You should check that out.

God, you are disillusioned 😅

You're a casteist if you believe caste is an integral part of your identity.

@@amolkhobaragade he is nationalist too better than anti nationals like you

​Nationalist and anti national are not the only two options

Abrahmism was always against Atheism; how does it have roots in it?

Culture always changes see 100 yrs back and see now.

@Human Being yes but that's the thing right, with hinduism you don't exactly know where the culture religion philosophy sciences that developed alongside begun and end, they are so interconnected that way

@@sqrt-1646 that is in the sense that neo atheism has the same idea of tolerance that the abrahmic religions had

@@ayushkumarsinha9959 Words can get confusing..A.medical doctor also writes Dr .same by a phd holder.. So one can't be used interchangeably. A muslim can also say he likes to celebrate eid and do fasting etc. But that would not make him muslim. Instead of Hindu culture you can call it Bharitiya sanskriti or Indian culture..

What a completely useless comment.

What if lecturing is your work What if you are a proffesor or a content creator on youtube or a parent 😅lol

@@vimoh and what a completely useless your videos are if you have your views about hinduism keep it with you don't just bark

@@skeptic2561 without working how can they become proffesor or a content creator on youtube or a parent lol think before replying

If u read basic hindu books then all these doubts wudnt even exist in u. Why not read ur own books with translation!!

Vimoh answer this question ❓

Already answered in video.

​@@vimohhow can you say upper cast hindu ?

​@@vimohJo hindu Upanishads hai usme guru aur shishya ke beech jo sawal jawab hua hai woh likha hai. Bad mai logo ko aasan language mai maz aaye iske liye story form banaya. log dharam follow kre issliye devo/god ki concept aaiye. Agar log adharam ke tare kese jiye tho accha nahi hoga.

Same reason you just used the word "ex". We are both using English. If I was speaking in Hindi, I would have said Nastik. These are commonly understood words that are used for convenience.

@@vimoh The epistomology used to reach this concept is different in Christian and Hindu perspectives. English might be used for convenience. but when an idea is being ironed out, Language and the culture its emerging out of is important. There is a reason why muslims use arabic terms to describe their concepts and don't used its English analogues officially.

I am using English. So are you. Case closed.

Just bcz the Hindu demography is divided into countless feuding sects doesn't make hinduism a "group of religions". It is still a single religion even if the followers may be spread across different incompatible castes. Those castes still follow the same books, gods and authority figures.

Absolutely.

A concept such as religion did not even exist before, calling Hinduism a group of religions is just wrong.

@@hiruzenmonofuke7344 fr fr

@@cauliflowerhead2735 yes you are right

It doesn't.

@@vimoh It does bro. You can do some research on it. I had literally went there 2 years ago along with my family. Not only the flag, but the entire wind within the temple was flowing in the opposite direction. Suppose outside the temple, the wind flows from east to west. But as soon as you enter, it starts flowing from west to east. Not only that, there are also many other mysteries associated with the temple.

And sun is pulled by horse chariot acc to Ved. Lot of science

​​@@sorenutpal6091not sun the god of sun like any other god ... Like indra and arjuna

@@sorenutpal6091 This is what happens when your English teacher forgets to teach you about Metaphors in Figures of Speech.

Adi shankaracharya has like no connection to charvaka, whatsoever except maybe some debates and discussions. Charvaka did not die because of him.

nice question

Like which shows

@@manyamishra6883 like TV Serials of every indian language

@@ShoshyDeolLonewolf03 Is that directly related to an atheism/philosophy/politics? Not so much really because then it will be more of a content review channel

@@manyamishra6883 no..... I was talking about a video I requested on TV Shows that promotes toxicity like Ideal women, Women misogyny etc.

But you are not in middle, you believe in god dont you?

@@gurnoorsingh2214 wait are you saying not believe is middle then? XD as i see being in middle means trying to discover if it is or not. There is "Yes" there is "No" and then there is "I don't know". But i do hope there's one tho, otherwise, this who life thing seems meaningless,i don't want to be more nihilistic then i already feel like sometimes XD

@@zupergut3015So you’re an agnostic theist.

All living beings are part of the greater soul and the greater soul sometimes sends full manifestations of itself(Krishna) to restore balance. They come to restore balance.

Exactly and hinduism (Sanatana Dharma) and Indian culture are deeply interwined. Say Diwali. Diwali is cultural pot of India but at the same it is religous. Now I want to be athiest. I don't believe in gods and also not in Rama . But I don't want to leave diwali because its my culture. I don't want to disbelieve in Rama perhaps I would still chose to worship him as a good human being of his time. I may also chant Hare Rama Hare Krishna. This is what my ancients have been doing for millenia. I don't want to abondon the kirtan bhajan because I like them. I don't want to stop listening to songs of Hindu gods because it gives me a peace of mind. And if I do all of those, I won't be called "athiest" by western standard anymore. So a Hindu athiest or Sanatani Nastik is one like me. And besides that as I said, There are many Sanatani Nastik sects. So Sanatani Nastik has every logic and rights to call her/himself as Sanatani Nastik.

@@Dhruv-Kumar yeah this is not so called as hindu atheism,this is called as you didn't find any logic in believing in God at the same time you didn't want to leave your religion because it was your religion since birth(this is called childhood indoctrination)

@@blahblahanything there are many athiests in west who still have proper christmas and easter. Athiests may chose to do whatever they enjoy they are not bound.

@@Dhruv-Kumar celebrating religious festival, listening religious song,etc isn't a problem,but praying God even knowing he/she didn't exist is definately not atheism,you just don't want to leave your religion so you claim yourself hindu atheist. You said you don't believe in god's and in Rama,and then you said I could still worship him as he was a good human at his time,this clearly shows you finding no logic in worshipping God but still you don't want to leave your religion. You said atheists in west celebrate Christmas but do they worship God saying "I don't believe in God but still I worship him because I love the teachings of Jesus"?

@@blahblahanything its like bts fan girls who kind of admires bts. So yes makes sense here aswell. So I admire Rama and his team cooperation. Worshipping means to be like him or admiring him. Unless you say bts fans follow bts religion and other related things.

@@Aryan-gc6ze so what did the Hindu called themselves

@@RajeshPatel-fe8rn You can call Bharatiya Atheist, if you dont like "Indian" word.

Please see my video on Indian Atheism.

Then just say Indian. Why use a word that is widely understood to be a religious identity?

@@vimoh because it is wrongly understood to be so. Just like how you'd say Jupiter was a Roman god. It means he is a god from the pantheon of gods followed in the religion that existed in Ancient Rome. Also, when you say Hindu it's not just the religious affiliation one refers to, there's a whole civilization and set of philosophies, most of which aren't related to religion but are definitely in the grey area. Most of the time when people use the term Hindu atheists, they are people who would want to disassociate the term with religion, wanting to get the original intent more mainstream acknowledgement.

@@othmanempire5687 Again, all those philosophies don't have much in common. The only thing they have in common is that they came from this landmass. And a better descriptor for this landmass is India. Hindu means a religion. If you want to have a conversation about something, use commonly accepted words. Not meanings that existed thousands of years ago.

@@vimoh again, if the whole point is about terminology, then I think I agree with you. But all I'm trying to do here is point out to you that probably the "Hindu Atheists" also mean what you mean, atleast in spirit. Also, something that is commonly accepted might not be factually right. Another way to look at it: there are people who participate in rituals purely for the culture and fascination, not necessarily because they have any religious obligation. Just as you said, broader Hindu culture allows you to question the concept of God and a lot of other things.

@@othmanempire5687 The problem with using Hindu atheist the same way as Indian atheist is that people do it due to an attachment to their religion. And their religion is decidedly superstitious and irrational. Not to mention politically problematic in present times

Dayanand Saraswati destroyed this carvaka philosophy

This comment could have not existed. Just saying.

@@vimoh Exactly how I like the indian, rational, critical thinking youtube space to be; taking offence at criticism. Oh you will go far. Just saying.

@@secondwaveprod Learn to take a joke.

@@vimoh Ah OK got it now 😂

@@secondwaveprod fr fr

So here's the thing. Human beings try to find meaning in life. They either examine their own thinking and beliefs and come to the conclusion that they have a purpose in life. Or they don't do such examination or go for one of the readymade purpose packages available to them. These readymade packages are religions. So when you ask me who is a true Hindu, my answer would be to ask why that question is important. Because maybe there is something called a true Hindu and maybe there isn't. The answers to that question can be various. It does not matter. We can engage in "true meaning" conversations till the proverbial cows come home. But it's a futile conversation. Truth is, if you want to call yourself Hindu, you can. It's no different from calling yourself a leprechaun or a robot or a dinosaur. It's just a word about whose definition there may be some disagreement and some agreement. The purpose of this channel and my content is not to define religious identities and make it easier for people to belong or not belong to them. The purpose is to throw light on the fact that these labels don't matter.

@@vimoh But here it is vimoh. Ofc these labels don't matter but unlike other Abrahamic faiths, is Hinduism's basic premise based on god? if not, then it essentially provides room for flexibility. So, culturally we may identify as a Hindu as there are no fixed rules that we have to believe in God to be called as Hindu? or is it? As different schools within the fold of Hinduism have been atheistic. So, what do you think,is the word "Hindu atheist" (no specific association with any Lokayata philosophy) is an oxymoron?

@@Amankumar-mb6vk Let me get this straight. You're asking me "If there are no guidelines, then what guidelines am I opposing when I say the phrase "Hindu atheist" contradicts guidelines? Let me know if that's what you are asking.

I mean does hinduism provides space to not believe in the god?

@@Amankumar-mb6vk See the problem with that question is that why should one seek permission from Hinduism to not believe in god? What is the need to identify as a Hindu if one doesn't believe in god? I mean you are a cyclist and a cook. Do you have to call yourself a cycling cook?

I am a Jain but Jainism believe in Aatma and Moksh. Both these does not have any proof.

​@@ankitjain3760 moksh - absolute nothingness. Soul is chetna or consiousness. Logically both of these exist. What doesn't exist is rebirth and karma theory of Jainism. I think karma and rebirth were invented to keep the morality intact, so that the law and order could be easily maintained and the masses could be controlled in a better efficient way. Jainism could have been a perfect atheistic hub if it had compromised it's theory on rebirth. Even karma could maybe somehow justified, but rebirth is something which will never be proved and doesn't exist either. I'll come to my point of how karma could exist in a practical form, I will give a very very basic example for that. You eat non veg, you behave more violently, because of the tamas gun of meat. Which leads you to behave in a violent way, often it could eventually lead you to troubles as it plays with your temper, and concentration. So if the tamas, rajas and satva gunas can be proven, it is easy to prove that non veg can lead to a bad destiny in future. Same way, if you steal, you might get caught someday, atleast there will be a fear of getting caught, or fear of getting robbed or fear that someone else might steal something from you. And hence that constant state of fear, could lead to concurrent problems. These can be logical justifications which can be given for karma. Karma was also evolved in order to create more empathy in human beings, so that they behave more empathetically towards everyone. As non violence (ahimsa) was one of main part of Jainism, karma might have been used to promote ahimsa. Karma might be a partially correct or partially incorrect theory, but it does help in maintaining social good and social harmony, if practiced thoroughly.

​@@mr.hazamayukiterumiBuddha was agonistic atheist. He didn't accept existence of god, whereas Mahavira was pure atheist, who blatantly claimed non existence of a supreme God. But anywhich ways, if you claim to be a Buddhist, you need to accept agonistic atheism, that you don't know whether god exists or not, and it doesn't matter if he does or not.

Hindu atheist means agnostic Because Hindu become atheist and believe divine energy create this universe this means he is agnostic

The charvaks were materialists. Materialism includes atheism. Atheism is just a rejection of god. But materialism is rejection of all spiritual claims.

@@vimoh tell me if someone who believes in devas and devis (higher beings but not gods) and not gods is an athiest or not. If not then people who believe on spirituality are also not athiests And if yes then even hindus who worship ram, krishna, brahma etc can say that they think of their gods not as gods but some higher beings and therefore they are athiests.

Being at 9:28, I would clarify that I am not an "upper caste". I don't precisely know how one defines the upper caste here, but if I understand this term mathematically, I belong to the lower half of the four castes in Hinduism.

At 10:05, I will clarify: Yes, I have said that I don't believe in sacred Gurus, I don't believe in Karma, and I don't believe in caste system. I have not said I don't believe in Vedas, primarily because I have not read them in their entirety (or even partially), and with that comes my initial comment that "Somethings in Vedas are wrong." is the negation of the statement "Vedas are absolutely correct.". "Some" might contain the whole set of things in Vedas, but I am not going to say "Everything in Vedas is wrong." just yet.

At 11:05 : What is the problem if everyone accepts that I am atheistic? Why does someone need to "raise a brow"?

At 11:03 : Can anyone explain what Vimoh means by materialistic, does he mean atheists absolutely need be that, and if yes to previous question, then why?

Brilliant video! Kudos to Vimoh. He explains his points brilliantly.

See episode 54 of my live stream

Oh that "way of life" card 😂. They keep throwing it as if other religions are not ways of life ! For that matter , even tapeworms' life is a way of life 😝.

Wtf does 'way of life' even means? I mean anything can be a 'way of life'. Eating shit can be a way of life. How and why tf does it even matter?

What nail in the head! 😂 He said if you don't believe everything in the Vedas are lies you cannot call yourselves a charvak. That is the stupidest thing I've heard today, the day is still young though. No book is full of lies! Every book has something right in it especially if it's popular. This guy doesn't want to give credit to the tradition that accepts atheism. Also why is he so protective of the category of 'atheists' as if they're important. Atheists are some of the most useless people in the history of humanity. Most of the great scientists are straight up believers in God or believers in some kind of God. Nobody inteligent who has done something with their inteligence looks at the Universe an says, "I am 100% sure there's no inteligence involved in the design of the universe" Because that is plain stupid to make such a claim knowing the things we know about our universe. And no one will make such a claim except these guys who want grab attention by saying things that seem intellectual.

​@@sumit92artistno where in the religion it says that we must eat shit. And if ppl around u are doing that than it is a you problem.

​@@vishwakumar2864well is it not ? Do atheists not like the teachings and culture ? Just asking

Many muslim-family-borned athiests are also there, so free thinking can't be in a special community,, how can family or community stop someone from thinking

​@@VishalYadav00003I don't understand the point you are trying to make with regards to my original comment. Can you clarify your intent?

Many did. Many didn't. I never said every single person did that. Please don't misrepresent my views or you will get banned.

@@vimoh The desire for banning people who disagree with you indicates a very high level of intolerance, something that a rational atheist should desist from doing. However, feel free to ban me whenever you want. I will take it sportingly. But when doing so ask yourself if you are feeling triggered by simple questions. How then will you present unbiased opinions to the outside world? Only small immature kids talk about "cancel culture" and "bans"! The best atheist channels on YT (should I recommend some to you?) are very openminded and allow others to challenge the host's opinions.

Thanks for the generic "be open minded" advice. But my point was about you lying about my views. You want open-minded discussion? Ask open-minded questions. Don't just outright lie and then expect a discussion. I do a live stream twice a week where I talk face to face with people who agree as well as disagree with me. So there is no question of being not open minded. That you would make that a point without addressing the fact that you lied about my views, says more about you than me.

@@vimoh I did not lie about your views. It is you who lie about my views about you. But you are finding it hard to accept it now given that I have explained the importance of not banning people who disagree. But you go ahead and do whatever you like. Its a free world.

I did not say that every Indian teenager started calling themselves an atheist because of books by Dawkins and others. You said that I did say so. Therefore, you lied. And now you are running away because I called you out on it. That's the summary of what happened. And I think it is plainly visible that you have not been banned. But you will be, if you continue to lie. And thanks for informing me that this is a free world where I can do whatever I want. I was thinking till now that I need your permission to do things.

कूल

@@scroll.withmohit after 9 months

It is definitely good. Bcoz i was also atheist but now a sanatani. But I wud recommend you to read vedas , upnishad nd geets with translation

There was probably no slaughtering, but yes, most of what we know about them comes from religious rhetoric and not their actual writings.

​@@vimohare you sure they weren't slaughtered? When charvaka school started challenging the establishments across bharatha, Jainas, boudhas and Brahmanas with the help of monarchs, crushed those materialists. Jainas, boudhas and Brahmanas have always been pro-establishment. They have always supported the monarchs, where as charvakas and ajivikas have always been anarchial in nature. That is a big reason charvakas and ajivikas faced persecution and hatred from the other sister school of thoughts and other Indian philosophies.

​@@hemishshah6666no slaughter happened

@@lovelle263 genocide deniers are similiar to genocide justifiers.

@@hemishshah6666 i dont deny but as much as i know i haven't found much on them being killed. Maybe i am unaware and maybe you are misinformed that they were slaughtered. To say genocide denyer is a justified of it is harsh. We can talk on moderate grounds

Not a huge fan of any Hindu atheist.

@@vimoh why don't you do a podcast with him ? That would be interesting. I'm looking to that.

yeah but they don't call themselves 'Christian Atheist', do they? You don't need to be a 'Hindu Atheist' to celebrate Diwali or other cultural festivals.

@@Nishxnt_Y bro that istn the point i couldnt careless what they call themselves i was just stating that hindu and india come from the same word indus so it is linked either way they are fixated on saying why we shouldnt be called hindu atheist and proceed to name indian atheist also about the christian thing because no country is named after the culture or to be more specific religion as mush as i know Ingnore the grammar and mistakes This is not my mother toungue

I am now convinced that atheists who insist against hindu atheism, have just as little idea of indian history and religion as the hindu nationalists they condemn. Or rather it is willful ignorance due to a sort of identity tribalism.

Atheist who celebrates Hindu festivals.

So what I'm atheist who celebrate hindu Muslim Christmas festivals whenever I feels like

lol most hindu celebrate christmas here in the uk doesn't mean they are christian hindu. Why are you mixing your religious identity with cultural identity. If you light firecrackers and not pray to Ram on diwali doesn't mean youre an hindu atheist. The burning crackers are a cultural event. Shia Muslims in india celebrate navroz because of their past in persia. Now navroz being a religious festival of parsi was also a cultural festival for people of persia back in the time.

India mein rehne waale Indian hote hain.

@@vimoh इंडिया शब्द इंग्लिश का है अंग्रेजो का दिया और हिन्दू शब्द अरबियों का दिया है असल शब्द तो सिंधू ही है We are sindhusthani or bharatvanshi

@@Nobita_hi_khalnayak I am talking about common words and definitions that we use every day. Everyone knows what Indian means and everyone knows what Hindu means and everyone knows Sindhu is a river valley civilisation. No need to rely on ancient definitions in order to have a conversation in 2022.

@@vimoh koyi kisi cheez ka uchcharan galat kar raha hai to iska ye katayi matlab nahi ho sakta ki uska sahi uchcharan galat hai

@@Nobita_hi_khalnayak Kaun kya galat kar raha hai? Kya ye galat hai ki India ke log Indian hain? Ya ye galat hai ki Hindu ek religion hai?

Or a civics lesson.

Firstly hinduism not a real name it is called sanatan dhrama means enternal course of actions, the theory of karma, the theory world is maya {world is pain and struggle of materialistic things}, theory of continuous cycle of birth, theory recreations, theory of leaving the cycle of birth {moksha} are origonated from south asia, in sanatan dhrama there are 33 gods and there different forms but if u follow one god then u only called religion like buddhism, hare krishna. That's why u never called hinduism a religion or cult like other abhramic religions. always believed for one god but in Hinduism there is one main things which itself not an god is called brahmaan. Abhramic religion are very different from. Dharamic religions

@@jiraiyasensei902 yea right. 1 out of 10 'real' people might agree with you on that. Hinduism is a religion in reality. Don't delude yourself otherwise. Every religion (even the abrahamic religions think and brand themselves as a 'way of life'. Please look up what the characteristics of cults are. Almost all religions fulfill them. And as a fun exercise the time you fill up a form, look for Sanatan Dharma :) Perception is reality. Edit: Way of life or School of thought.

@@BenNeedsATheme4aDream Define religion, please .

@@BenNeedsATheme4aDream hinduism is more a culture. And any Indian with Indianness (someone who has Indian culture) will be called a Hindu.

What is enlightenment?

@@vimoh you speak so well but you don't know enlightenment

@@Raja-ff9ks context

You are just a regular human being who likes something and wants to do it..

Buddhism came before vedangas and upanishads ?🤣🤣🤣🤣🙏 Man gye guru ,it's proven you have not read any shrutis / smritis

@@rajababu42010 saying the same lines what u r arguing against with some lol emojis ,thats some next level argument. go do worshipping in ur temples dont use rational part of ur brain bc u have not used that for a long time ,reactionary cuck larn scietific heiranchy,peer reviewed researches,excavation findings ,some not fairy tales ,its like believing in marvel comics ,at best they r entertaining thats it

Sources?

Refference ? Source ? Proof ? How u know budhism came b4 sanatan ? Gauam was gborn in sanatan. 😂