You can’t have rust in your domain name it’s against rust policies 😂😂

Anywhere to get the cheat sheet without signing up for spam?

Im actually stil using the app i made using angularjs(v1) and ionic 😂. Wasn't fun but got the job done.

@@lufenmartofilia5804 angular sucks

What have you built since then?

@@binaryum mainly backend APIs

Did the same, really got productive when C# came out. It just clicked more than anything else I was using at the time.

As a hobby coder I lived (and love) C#, compared to MFC and C++ and what not. I could do stuff with that in an instant, first with Forms and then with WPF. And too bad Silverlight went away, that was better than ASP NET. In a two-tier DBMS with C# in the backend using Linq-to-SQL and Silverlight in the front end, that I used as a promo to attract business (I'm in legal services not programming) I got compliments from even experienced developers. I hope Rust also takes off but, like Silverlight, it could fizzle. It all depends on what devs like and these days I think, given so many inexperienced programmers, it might not take off, we'll see. Having programmed in Pascal and C I'm ok with 'borrowing' / pass by reference and using structures / enums as 'objects'. OOP is overhyped (I never used the "Gang of Four" OOP patterns much, I pretty much stuck to just using composite types as objects and once in a while writing an interface).

Exactly!

If c++ removed raw pointer and broke all bounds with c then it might have been a safe language but the impossibility of keeping raw pointers safe breaks everything and the moment something calls malloc or new outside smart_ptr you are done for.

It's always another developer right? ;)

I'll let you in on a secret. Those c++ programs you worked on yourself weren't as safe as you thought they were and you ended up spending more time late in projects chasing down crash stacks than time you would have spent fighting with the borrow checker. ;-)

@@redcrafterlppa303 "If c++ removed raw pointer and broke all bounds with c" It would be safer, but you still have problems with multiple mutable references to something being out. Without the borrow checker std::string_view (aka &str in rust) is a landmine.

And? Whats your experience with rust after 4 months?

@@kidmosey I would highly reccomend the book Rust Web Programming by 'maxwell flitton'. If you come at that book with a clear head it should take care of most of the bits you mentioned. Its covered in the rust book but this book goes about things a little differently, but coming from writing in MERN to this has definitely pushed me on so would highly reccomend! But it does of course depend on what you were writing with c#. Kinda felt like express in reverse in areas for me, you dont really end up with a lot of code repetition. That being said hopefully that book can help. Definitely got me on the right track.

@@martynclarke8400Thanks! This is helpful for a newbie like me too.

Agree with this and in the same note think an engineer should never be married to specific tools to be an engineer. 💯

​@@meetthereqs But dam... I want to marry rust. ❤ F*kin love it.

Poem has everything included, but it's not that talked about

I've spent some time. There are jobs but they're pretty hard to get into, even if you're experienced in something else. Easier if you're already in the systems programming space.

Angular and all Javascript framework are a regression and make you type a lot of html, css and Javascript and before that was automated in frameworks, things like prime faces still exists thanks god

just because rust can do mostly everything, it doesn't mean it should be used for everything. there's a nice site with a list of companies which adopted rust, and they use it for infrastructure, low level stuff and tools. not microservices or frontend, even though it can do that.

@@minciNashu can you share the site url?

Difficult to say. It depends on what you think you might want to do. For example, one of Rust's sweet spots is WebAssembly, so it's easy to script a Rust WA component from JS/TS. Rust does have a steeper learning curve than Go, but it also has very good documentation and tooling, with excellent help messages.

I'd recommend C#. As you mentioned you already have a background in C#.

@@bity-bite Thanks, but C# is not an option in our backend, maybe not even Golang. Now it's mostly C/C++.

i didn’t make the video but personally i (maybe like low-intermediate level of knowledge) messed around with the language and tried to write things in it and also just read the manual sometimes and used chatgpt when i got stuck

@@Blaineworld yea am kinda doing the same thing now.... solving leetcode questions that I have done before and trying to do them with rust and if I get stuck using chat gpt for help. Also, do u have any experience with Rocket the rust webframework for apis?

@@brownboyintokyo7368 no

Typescript adds more boilerplate for useless reasons

@@degenyakuza Making your code more stable and reducing testing and debugging time aren't useless reasons.

@@johnforde7735 increasing more boilerplate code is use WASM if you really care about this

tomorrow a video with the reverse title will be posted, i can smell it

Why not?

exactly my doubt

its rusty not just r*st

Leptos, Yew, Dioxus, Sycamore, etc.

With difficulty

you don't find a job. jobs find you 😆

I don't think so. If anything you can use ChatGPT to accelerate your learning. You can use it to translate a language you're comfortable in into rust, and not only will chatGPT translate it for you but it will tell you how the two languages are different and give you little tips. ChatGPT is going to replace developers that don't adapt and use it, but developers that learn it and get very comfortable with it will literally 100x their productivity. ChatGPT can spit out code, but you still need someone to take that code and build a fully functional application. That person will still need a good grasp of software development to do that.

@@thequestion3953 I think that this is indeed where we go. But ChatGPT currently is still very useless for most application development. I tested it for my last video writing Game Genie code encoder, which is a simple problem that has been documented well but not a lot of code is written so it couldn’t have learned it from copying someone else code on github. But it didn’t do anything useful, it gave a valiant attempt, but it shows that it’s just a copy and paste bot. And most of my engineering is creating things that have not been done before. And my design time is always 80% of the project. The development is merely an after thought. And I hate having to explain it to junior devs because explaining it takes longer than writing it myself. And ChatGPT is dumber than people who only need half a word. As it did a massive 6 step case statement to get the corresponding number to character conversion. I had to fucking tell it to use a straightforward array because the eventual response would be a nibble that can be indexed immediately into that array. Only a moron would code something like that… I guess there’s a lot of morons since it steals code from others and obviously demonstrates this way to not think as a developer. It also cracked me up when I gave it my Zig code and said: “make it more efficient”. And it added ternary statements with ? and : which Zig doesn’t have. I said that ternary statements in this format aren’t supported. “Oh sorry let me fix that” And it reverted the code 🤣 I did want to explain it could actually use the more verbose ternary but hey… I had enough of Mr Jippity by then 🤣 I am sure it gets better and gets away of the grunt work. But like I said the coding is more like an after thought for me and a breather. And I think now ChatGPT is just nowhere near a senior developer level and probably never will be because it has no domain knowledge. The hardest part for me as a freelancer is, getting to grips with the domain specified environments at a customer. And even at this bank where I’m now at the 4th different department, their workflows and domain specifieks are different than at CISO again. I can actually translate the domain specifics more easily because CISO is far more strict than controlling so I can take that strictness and let it go in certain cases. But I can also tell them that they are not compliant in other cases because they don’t adhere to CISO requirements.

Like RPC ?