When you see Spica's propellant tanks swelling on its launch platform in the future - don't worry, that's how they're supposed to look! 😄 You can roughly see how the Spica tanks will look like after deformation hardening in this blog post: copenhagensuborbitals.com/spica-tanks/
@tinldw4 жыл бұрын
So that post is what I've been missing for several months :/
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
@@tinldw Not sure how YOU missed it... ;)
@tinldw4 жыл бұрын
When you started to release lots of videos, I've got an impression that they contain the most important stuff and I stopped checking the blog unless mentioned in the video, description or comments. I guess, now I should read it.
@kanahn74024 жыл бұрын
Lol, same track as Munro Live
@partymstr44 жыл бұрын
[Preface... I'm not an engineer or qualified in any way on rockets and such.] After watching your interesting video on how the tank become stronger with deformation hardening as pressure is exerted on the inside, how will that be affected as it reaches closer to the vacuum of space or will the initial/static thickness of the tank(s) negate those pressure differences and keep it from either swelling further or crumpeling like a beer can?
@lewismassie4 жыл бұрын
That bit on the work hardened tanks was super interesting
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear!
@johnpepin53734 жыл бұрын
Did I hear you right? You reached 96 bar with that tank? If so why Can't Space X get to 9 bar? Their hull is far thicker.
@fragger564 жыл бұрын
@@johnpepin5373 Tank diameter, the larger the tank the more material is needed to contain the pressure as the inside surface area goes up and pressure is force x area.
@johnpepin53734 жыл бұрын
@@fragger56 ty
@AstroCharlie4 жыл бұрын
Deliberately work hardening pressure vessels is standard practice in the industry, typically called 'autofrettage' I love the depth of this video, and as always, I'm jealous of your shop!
@shhharas4 жыл бұрын
Is that common practice for propellant tanks as well? Curious since I've never seen any rockets with "swollen" propellant tank sections before.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
It's also not the first time we do it either, actually. The cooling jackets for our BPM5 engines were stretched into their required size and wall thickness using autofrettage. And thank you, Charlie! The workshop comes with its high rent, loud squeaking, and nail-biting cold temperatures during winter, unfortunately. :) Though we haven't found anything better yet.
@teamidris4 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals when all argued it is just a simple pressure vessel, so taking it beyond working pressure to stretch the structure is normal. On the specials we would add water to increase the pressure as it expanded. (Stretch) Once 1.5 working pressure had been achieved they would hold pressure at 1.5 without expanding more. Fascinating to stick a dti on the outside and watch it match the pressure gauge. (Designed cat2 CE pressure vessels in ally and steel)
@W1ldTangent4 жыл бұрын
@@shhharas This principal was used with early ballistic missiles to make them as light as possible. The Titan II had to be handled carefully in regards to loading and unloading propellant not just because it used hypergolic fuel, but because otherwise it was at risk of collapsing under its' own weight if you filled the upper tank or emptied the lower tank first.
@petertrei4 жыл бұрын
BIANCA: Please DONT use a drill press with your hair loose!
@glassbeads66514 жыл бұрын
Very important comment this one. Safety first.
@hucklo4 жыл бұрын
A friend got stuck with his clothes in the drill press he only had boxers on after the machine ripped his clothes. He was 150 kg muscle so he could resist being rolled around the chuck.
@poldiderbus33304 жыл бұрын
Yes, and don't drill with gloves on! The result if a finger gets caught in the drill can be really bad!
@marxug14 жыл бұрын
As an ex-machinist, I second that!!
@LaRdArms4 жыл бұрын
Yes, i rather have a smal cut on my hand, then have my whole finger or hand ripped of by the drill press when the glove got caught.
@kwandakekana98904 жыл бұрын
That tank landing in the ocean was something else 🤯
@RajKumar-hu4tk4 жыл бұрын
Your government should appreciate for your work.
@animatedzombie644 жыл бұрын
They are independent organisations. Government doesn't care at all. It's space Industry.
@BigCroca3 жыл бұрын
They will make Denmark one of the first 10 countries to make it to space
@THEFINPete2523 жыл бұрын
@@animatedzombie64 what do you even mean? most satellites in the early space age 1950-1990 had government backing. Aswell as Nasa Esa Roscosmos are government funded space programs.
@THEFINPete2523 жыл бұрын
@@animatedzombie64 Aswell as spaceX and nasa co-operations with Commersial resupply and Commersial Crew programs
@nerdcm3554 жыл бұрын
You guys are partly the reason I’ve decided on aerospace for a career. Thanks for being such an inspiration :)
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Right back at you! It's amazing to hear and we wish you good luck finding your place in aerospace, but if you have been following or supporting our endeavor, then you are a big reason of us being here too. :)
@RajKumar-hu4tk4 жыл бұрын
Good job all of u guys, Love from India.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@TJ-up8vj4 жыл бұрын
It's at times like these that I wish I knew Danish and ran away to Denmark to join you guys
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
We have volunteers who don't speak Danish, so we use English a lot (just run away!). 😄
@waylontmccann4 жыл бұрын
"Hey google, translate: Take me with you into Danish"
@azerwhite88704 жыл бұрын
I want to!!! Would you take someone has very little experience? Learn on the job?😂
@petermaersk-moller30144 жыл бұрын
We have several nationalities represented in CS and communication is in english, when one or more present is/are not danish speaking. Language is not really a problem, Llving close enough to Copenhagen to show up usually is.
@azerwhite88704 жыл бұрын
I would move to Copenhagen 😂
@IneptOrange4 жыл бұрын
I love that the new generation of high-tech spacecraft is going to be the same stuff we've eaten with for decades; stainless steel. I know it's been in use since the 1950s for spacecraft, but nobody really could have seen it coming. It's kind of amazing that the very material we use on a day to day basis could eventually find its way into a rocket given enough time and recycling.
@davidk13084 жыл бұрын
@Samuel Shin SpaceX for example found that compared to carbon fiber, steel would actually be lighter because of reduced heatshield requirements, and it was better at cryo (among other things), they didn't choose steel for no reason you know.
@Whataboutit4 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation of your construction process! Thank you!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Hi, Felix. That's what we do here, bringing it all to the table. ;)
@pooounderscoreman4 жыл бұрын
Felix! Looking forward to seeing you report on CS more in future 😃
@free_spirit14 жыл бұрын
1:54 Sandy Munro suddenly walks in frame
@kennyg13584 жыл бұрын
"Hello boys and girls"
@alexinsomniac4 жыл бұрын
Just got a Mach2 membership. I've been thinking about it for a while now, as it's a lot of money for a student living on ramen, but it's well spent
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Alex, we really appreciate it!
@alexinsomniac4 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals :)
@RajKumar-hu4tk4 жыл бұрын
I always watch your videos. N u all inspire me to do great for humanity. Keep it up.
@Tonicwine9994 жыл бұрын
I had no idea this was happening - Thanks youtube suggestions
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Better late than never! Welcome aboard, if you are into rockets, we have a lot of content for you to catch up on. :)
@Tonicwine9994 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals Annoyed I am late, I thought that the internet would have guided me here quicker!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
@@Tonicwine999 You're still in time for some upcoming ethalox engine tests in the near future if that cheers you up. Which you can join via live stream or in person in case you live near Copenhagen.
@sokkasspacesword28914 жыл бұрын
Love your work as always.Thank you for doing videos like this👍👍👍
@mglmouser4 жыл бұрын
Wow! The splashdown came in like a tomahawk missile!
@ValExperimenter4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that info, I might try 304L the next time I hydroform some exhaust pipes. One advantage of causing yield on the tank is relieving stress concentrations. Stainless steel was good enough for the titan rocket tanks.
@zfilms48584 жыл бұрын
Nice to see you back!
@Civilsitis Жыл бұрын
How cool is University students drill ,screw and weld for their projects and not only solve equations . This is real engineering
@JamesMBC4 жыл бұрын
I love the creative aspect of using deformation as a feature, it's really clever. Definitively keeping my eye on CS from now on!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Glad to have you on board, James! Don't let your eyes off of us, haha.
@adrianwasawo4 жыл бұрын
And here I thought only Spacex were the quick and dirty ones! Keep it up!
@Keiranful4 жыл бұрын
Fascinating stuff. Just for reference, did you switch to 304L before or after SpaceX? Where they maybe inspired by you?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
We had settled on 304L probably before the (then) ITS, later BFR, now Starship was announced. Doubt we had much to do with them switching to 304L, although it would be a nice story. :)
@randyfox3644 жыл бұрын
@Copenhagen Suborbitals Why is 304L better than 301 stainless for building Starship? Isn’t 301 much stronger & pressure resistant than 304L? What’s the benefits of 304L>301 other than increased corrosion resistance?
@Keiranful4 жыл бұрын
@@randyfox364 Afaik, better performance cryogenic temperature. At least, that's what Musk said. There are very few steels that do not suffer from cryogenic embrittlement.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
@@randyfox364 We're not SpaceX, so can't answer you exactly. :) But 304L remains more ductile at cryogenic temperatures than 301. Welds might also be easier on 304L and stronger.
@randyfox3644 жыл бұрын
@ Copenhagen Suborbitals Thanks. I know you’re not Space X but I figured you’d know why they made the switch. 🚀
@archangeblandin6764 жыл бұрын
Stainless steel FTW ! It's great to see what high pressure you can reach with the tanks which is way higher than the required pressure.
@tinkmarshino4 жыл бұрын
Like I have always said.. when in doubt over build! stainless.. ask Elon... I almost just hit the "not interested" but then thought I would see what this was about... I found this very intriguing. Especially the part about deformation hardening. I had not thought of this before but it makes perfect sense.. I may hang around a bit and check out some more of your videos..
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching, glad to hear you found it interesting! And if rockets are your thing, do hang around. 😉
@etiennedud4 жыл бұрын
The workshop is re-open, hip hip hip hourra :)
@waylontmccann4 жыл бұрын
Did you guys just give us spoilers about future CS goals?! I love it! Reusability and high volume production/launches are a fantastic idea. So... when are you unveiling the CS Cubesat delivery stage adapter? Will that be Spica II? ;) Could Spica be used as a demonstration launch to provide proof of concept, then used in applications for additional support from your regional government? The future sure looks exciting for you and the team. Congratulations and keep up the great work!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! No orbital launch plans for the future yet. Getting a person safely to and back from suborbital space is enough work on our hands in our spare time at the moment. :) What Jacob meant by saying large scale reusable launchers was Spica. It's a large rocket for our terms.
@hopper1aoa154 жыл бұрын
Yeah I have worked with it....I used to work as a specialist welder in Aviation working on jet engine components...
@stocky92184 жыл бұрын
I hope your team is successful in your goals. I myself am trying to build a little liquid fuelled rocket for fun and I hope I can work on larger rockets one day. Also I would love to know what sort of tank pressures you are going for
@olsonspeed4 жыл бұрын
Excellent work, hard to believe this is a DIY project, very ambitious.
@funkengruven77734 жыл бұрын
Great discussion on material and tank design! We don't only want to see rockets fly; we want to know how they're built as well!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! And that's exactly what we do here thanks to our supporters.
@benwoodman65454 жыл бұрын
Is the plan to deformation harden the tanks before they're installed, or will they be deformed for the first time on the pad?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
They will be hardened right after they are finished welding.
@lorenwilson81284 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals Have you considered annealing the welds before stress-hardening the tanks?
@Chrisamic4 жыл бұрын
This comment from me, a certified welder: The attachments to the end caps are way over welded. You don't need fillets of that size on thin sheet metal - you only need fillets the same leg length as the thickness of the material to achieve the required strength. Also look at the strength requirements: do they actually need to be fully welded? I got my ass kicked for over welding stringers on a ship because of the extra and unnecessary weight (7cm beads instead of 5cm beads, on an 11,000 ton ship). Extra weight on a rocket is even more important. Also, why the heck would you not TIG (GMAW) weld this? The downsides of TIG are that it is slower and has a larger HAZ, however the control you have is far more important than both of those factors.
@linusnilsson91944 жыл бұрын
The IWS in me would like to see the WPS tbh 🤨
@michaelpatrick69504 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. As a chemical engineer in the food ingredients industry , I would never accept MIG welding on 304. Maybe if the heat treated post welding.
@Chrisamic4 жыл бұрын
@@linusnilsson9194 2020, endcap WPS: Jacob has a welder. I do understand, 100% volunteer projects are often very much like that. I worked in an industry where even (or especially) management didn't understand what I did or why I did things the way I did - it was always a constant battle and they hardly ever knew or acknowledged how many times I saved their bacon. In the realm of enthusiast projects it's sometimes a case of not knowing what you don't know until someone tells you (or it all goes wrong).
@Chrisamic4 жыл бұрын
@@michaelpatrick6950 As long as 308L filler is used, it should combat chromium migration and chromium carbide production to a large extent. Heat treatment is not really feasible in this case because it requires a heat soak at over 1000 C and a quench, and it's for normalisation/solution annealing primarily. For food grade applications you'd certainly want to see the weld and HAZ pickled to remove surface iron and carbides and in the case of the rocket it would improve the corrosion resistance of the welds and HAZ. I'd want to do some testing before I'd recommend an exact procedure.
@linusnilsson91944 жыл бұрын
@@michaelpatrick6950 care to elaborate a bit more on the reason why? Since I know a company that does pulse mig for just ur type of industry, they don't any post heat treatment, they do acid bath the whole thing after tho
@MrHichammohsen14 жыл бұрын
That metal balloon tank looks delicious
@VexChoccyMilk4 жыл бұрын
Calm down Uri Tuchman
@Thefreakyfreek4 жыл бұрын
You inspired me to start making a simple liquid feul rocket at home an some parts made at work already had some results cant wait I made my combustion chamber to short so I have to macine an extension from 316l steal good luck
@rjrfletcher23554 жыл бұрын
BPS Space on Steriods ! (although wonder if Joe's work on gimble control might be useful ?)
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Joe is awesome! We've already flown 3 thrust vector controlled rockets (via jet vanes) just so you know. :) Sapphire in 2013, Nexø I in 2016, and Nexø II in 2018. We've also made and static tested and engine gimbal with our ethalox BPM5 engine: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gNmYgZpy1NKtkok.html
@rjrfletcher23554 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals I have a lot of videos to catch up on !!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
@@rjrfletcher2355 Only a few hundred videos. ;) If this interests you, you can get a better project overview by checking our website www.copsub.com and then you can start picking topics apart which interest you the most.
@softb4 жыл бұрын
❤️ Nice
@jorehir4 жыл бұрын
Lots of interesting info and a nice workshop atmosphere. Subscribed.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Pleased to have you on board!
@JosePerez-cf1ow4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting
@debajyotimajumder26564 жыл бұрын
2:00 thats the intro music of MunroeLive channel
@dnlsndr4 жыл бұрын
Not to mention that stainless steel also has less thermal deformation that aluminium, making it more predictable during extreme temperatures.
@favesongslist4 жыл бұрын
That's why SpaceX are using it for their up coming Starships.
@fredpinczuk73524 жыл бұрын
Amazing presentation, couple of quick questions. What is the expected shrink after a 10% pressure stretch / volume expansion? Does the material shrink back? If so, at what ratio and it it gradual over X number of days/Hours/Minutes? Once in operation, will you be then monitoring its overall stretch dimension during a mission? Cheers
@jmspaceR4 жыл бұрын
Great work! Keep it up!
@2cool4u34124 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the informative video! Just curious, have you guys had to push back schedule milestones due to longer lead times on parts? Any idea of when the next test fire will be? Keep up the good work!
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! And yes, unfortunately we had to. No dates for test fires yet, as the new injectors need to pass waterflow and coldflow tests first, but those should start happening fairly soon.
@brianshivers47354 жыл бұрын
Cool stuff. Will you be passivating the tanks?
@alexinsomniac4 жыл бұрын
Very insightful video! Is your website down at the moment? Edit: all good now
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@shinjithenegotiator27954 жыл бұрын
more of these longer videos
@AirCommandRockets4 жыл бұрын
Awesome update. Thanks for taking the time to explain the reasoning behind using SS. Do you think the hardening will affect the welds differently? I had to close my eyes when the blade started cutting the vernier calipers. :) Good idea though.
@petermaersk-moller30144 жыл бұрын
@Air Command Rockets. Yes we tested various weld methods to destruction which includes deformation. You can see our video on weld testing in the video "Are Our Welds Space Worthy? | INSIDE THE ROCKETSHOP : Episode 20" here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h62CopqYtKeYhnk.html
@ryanrising22374 жыл бұрын
So have you decided who it is you’re sending into space on one of these things, or is the company-wide gladiator tournament that determines that still to come?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
We have three astronaut candidates/volunteers at the moment, but the first Spica flights won't be crewed, so there's still time before we let out those gladiators.
@c.miller16714 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals where do I go to apply for the program?
@otheraccount52524 жыл бұрын
@@c.miller1671 Do you have a Danish gladiator's license?
@c.miller16714 жыл бұрын
@@otheraccount5252 I am learning how to fly Gliders if that counts.
@johndododoe14114 жыл бұрын
@@c.miller1671 They already disqualified an enthusiast that took flying lessons and was completely mad.
@vicroc44 жыл бұрын
Nowadays stainless steel may be a controversial choice for building rockets, but that wasn't so during the early days of the American space program. The Atlas Launch Vehicle, derived from the SM-65 Atlas ICBM, was almost entirely constructed from stainless steel. Though it got around the structural weight penalties by not having much structure to begin with - the fuel tanks were the fuselage, and it used pressure in the tanks to keep them in shape.
@destroyer29733 жыл бұрын
Try a nuclear salt water rocket. The only high thrust high efficiency rocket. I recommend a chemical first stage and a nuclear second stage.
@olivergledhill86684 жыл бұрын
If you are able to create higher pressure tanks. Is there ever a temptation to increase the chamber pressure by 5 or 10 bar extra ? Would this require an engine geometry change?
@robbiejames15404 жыл бұрын
To take advantage of the extra chamber pressure, almost certainly.
@basbekjenl4 жыл бұрын
correct me if I'm wrong but 96 bars would be water pressure at 1km depth right it's amazing the steel tank could contain that level of stress. Hydraulics are terrifying my grandfather worked with hydrolics and told me stories of 400 bars it's now years later that I can appreciate what that meant.
@garyknight86164 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant. Wish I'd known about this a long time ago. Need any help with CFD?
@Bluuplanet4 жыл бұрын
Soft aluminum extrusions on a long pallet will work-harden just bouncing down the road on a flat-bed trailer. If hardening the stainless beyond reaching an acceptable balloon distortion is desired, I would imagine that can be achieved with sonic vibratory treatment.
@jogajens3 жыл бұрын
96 bar :-) sejt og stærkt gået, CS !
@craiga20024 жыл бұрын
This American says - Heck of a good job!!
@SimonAmazingClarke4 жыл бұрын
I am an Aircraft Design Weights engineer. I used to have a boss who was a Stress Engineer. His moto was, Thick an strong can't be wrong. For battleships yes. My moto is, Thin and light must he right. Especially for rockets. Building battleships loses you a tremendous amount of height. Use the minimum thickness that you can to satisfy your load requirements ot come up with alternative construction methods.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Hello Simon, we are not trying to achieve the highest apogee possible. We just need to cross the Karman line for now. And we want to make sure we need to build as few rockets as possible while we test it out sufficiently in flight, where we can then take and optimize the structure if needed.
@gmeast4 жыл бұрын
You are 'smart' people!! ... right on target. I am starting 2 projects right now: a Stainless Steel Alloy hydrogen-filled 'balloon' and a Vacuum 'balloon' ... both of which require 'special' mechanical design and materials processing.
@pooounderscoreman4 жыл бұрын
WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN? So many quotation marks...
@GRIZZ3574 жыл бұрын
F/A master wielder you guys ROCK!
@aplacefaraway4 жыл бұрын
one important property of 304 is spacex uses it
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
That's only a very recent property of it, however.
@c.miller16714 жыл бұрын
When do you think you will acheive the first crewed launch?
@smellycat2494 жыл бұрын
Those rollers on that sheet metal roller are mild steel. They will impregnate your stainless with metal and it will rust. Putting painters tape on the rollers will help keep your stainless pretty
@VoltageLP4 жыл бұрын
Didn't expect to see MIG welding
@ZeroCool-vn9bd4 жыл бұрын
Hi I love what you are doing, have donated, been to one of your tests though it was the one with the oxygen valve issue, but if you don't try, nothing will ever happen. So props to you and if it was not for one damn chemistry class I'd probably be at DTU now, but you never know what the future holds. I am interested in "simple" amateur model rocketry (biggest rocket I have is 70cm in DK, that can take 2 D, E, F motors with telemetry, camera, gps tracking, etc. under 400g loaded) but I cannot find any Danish regulations on the topic other than that it seems like rockets are considered drones now in Denmark. DARK "Dansk Amatør Raket Klub" seems to have stopped existing after 2016. I grew up making lots of "Estes" rockets in the US, and of course the laws are completely different. Since I live in Odense, we have quite a bit of military airspace, and I don't want to get into huge trouble. I do have access to the flight website for DK that shows the current airspace flights, and restricted zones though, and obviously check.I have a much smaller rocket, that I've just launched once, that does not have all the gismos, but uses the same dia. motors as a testbed since I'm making the motors from scratch. Any idea's where to look or who to contact if it's possible to do this hobby in Denmark? MvH -Eric
@keys724 жыл бұрын
Pressure fed? No open cycle turbo pumps? Does it lose thrust at the end because the pressure would be lower? Did you work it out so that it lowers it’s thrust as it loses mass so that the total acceleration would remain more constant?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Yes, no open cycle. Keep in mind we are a cowdfunded, all-volunteer project doing this all in our spare time. Making turbo pumps in house is rather difficult (although there are some skunkworks gas turbine projects on the backburner, but nothing substantial yet). One could argue pressure fed is also a bit safer whilevstill offering enough performance for our needs. Pressure fed is not pressure blowdown, so you can keep feeding the engine constant pressure throughout the whole flight. But yes, to keep G loads on our astronaut at comfortable levels we will "switch" to pressure blowdown in the latter end of the flight to throttle down. However, we also have a collaboration going with a startup that is making electric pumps for small lanchers and we will be testing and perhaps even flying their first pumps with Spica's BPM100 engine. There's a video on that: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y9uFZdpj0N--mXk.html
@keys724 жыл бұрын
Copenhagen Suborbitals You guys are incredible... too much cool to describe in words! I bet with an electric turbo pump, the ability to reignite and that insane gimbal you got on your rocket you’d be able to develop one that lands just like space x... but mini :-)
@TimBox4 жыл бұрын
I'm amazed that a tri-clamp could hold that pressure.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
I guess that is one of our special ingredients, but we've successful flown 4 hybrid and 2 liquid rockets on tri-clamps. Not to mention the probably hundreds of engine tests we ran with no issues, so they can hold quite a bit.
@Bluuplanet4 жыл бұрын
I suppose the vertex point on the right side of the ballooned ruptured tank is the initial point of rupture.
@BC-wj8fx4 жыл бұрын
Nice use of the humble 304L. P.S. at 14:00 those are digital calipers not verneir scale calipers.
@realexivus9504 жыл бұрын
The welds at 2:22 look like the kind of shit i'd put down when i was first learning to weld.
@peachtrees274 жыл бұрын
Heaven = working on rockets among the most beautiful women on Earth #CopenhagenSuborbitals Thanks for the excellent vid everyone!
@simontanguay36194 жыл бұрын
About SS304... from what I have read, it does not like saltwater or chloride-rich environments. Which is why the recovery from sea has me worried. Wouldn't SS316 be a better choice, recovery-wise? (take this with a literal grain of salt, as I am no expert)
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Both 304 and 316 series stainless steels are strongly corrosion resistant, 316 being just a bit more so. The 304L that we use has less carbon than the standard 304, which also improves its corrosion resistance further. For the amount of time Spica will be subjected to salt water we are not worried. :)
@matthewf19794 жыл бұрын
Strength vs heat is also very good in 304L SS.
@randyfox3644 жыл бұрын
304L has a lower melting point than 301 I believe, are you sure about that?
@charletonzimmerman42054 жыл бұрын
I did work, for US Navy, Mid-80's , on ,1,200 psi, steam Catapult, piping on aircraft carriers, "Heat treating" Pre-heat welding, & after, "STRESS Relief" do you "Heat Treat" you're tanks.?
@allenlong14454 жыл бұрын
So cool good luck
@aidanlacey99884 жыл бұрын
How can I get involved with you guys? Do you need any design engineers?
@mobspeak4 жыл бұрын
Space Vikings incoming!
@gerhardkutt17483 жыл бұрын
Ah same music as Munro live = the car guy who takes apart EV's including TESLA's and comments on their build strategies from component level. Might want to change your music? Great shot of 'spash down' - I would call it a dive entry - I gave it a 10 as there was no 'splash' as the rocket ripped the entry like a great dive, so I would call it a 'rip entry' instead of a splash down. C'mon guys - be original. Splash downs are with parachutes and splash. Rip entry is so much cooler! Fantastic presentation btw. I am subscribed. You guys are inspirational!! Well done. Problem with aluminium is you can start off with high hardness aluminium (strong) but once you apply heat, that hardness and strength is reduced significantly. Also you need thicker Aluminium so volume of material needed is higher. Stainless steel is 3x stronger, so you can go a lot thinner. 96 bar is great for 2mm plate for that size !!
@mishapatapovich39964 жыл бұрын
approximately how long would it take to finish the full rocket?
@TheImmortuary4 жыл бұрын
Could you shot blast the outer surface to gain extra strength as well?
@danahebdon68104 жыл бұрын
That could actually weaken the material
@TheImmortuary4 жыл бұрын
@@danahebdon6810 Shh be quiet, the adults are talking.
@danahebdon68104 жыл бұрын
@@TheImmortuary - I am an adult, and have worked in the nuclear industry, was certified w/heat treatments. So, please don't tell me to shush or shut up.
@TheImmortuary4 жыл бұрын
@@danahebdon6810 I told you to shut up because you are embarrassing yourself, but you decided to just double down Ok Mrs. Nuclear, please enlighten us all, how increasing the surface area will weaken the steel?
@pooounderscoreman4 жыл бұрын
LOUD NOISES
@Skunkhunt_423 жыл бұрын
Triclamps for compressed liquid service? Or are they temporary?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals3 жыл бұрын
We've used tri-clamps on 6 rocket launches and 100's of static engine tests.
@Skunkhunt_423 жыл бұрын
@@CopenhagenSuborbitals cool, well they obviously work well for your app. Just curious- What pressure vessel codes/standards are your tanks required to be built to? I'm not from your industry but in mine, triclamps are technically not allowed for services using compressed/liquidfied gasses as process fluid. Alfa Laval only intended for the triclamp design to be used in processes for things like beer/milk. Clearly triclamps are working well for your application and maybe less of a safety concern than in my industry (separation/purification processes that- uses LPG as the process fluid)
@Microbex4 жыл бұрын
Is there any commercial interest in launching the rocket? Like sending small satellites in orbit?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
Spica will be a sub-orbital launch vehicle. There are some research and commercial hardware testing business opportunities for suborbital rockets, but we are a 100% crowdfunded project with hundreds of supporters from around the world donating a small amount each month to see this project develop and fly.
@petermaersk-moller30144 жыл бұрын
The Spica rocket is designed for suborbital jumps to space only. So orbital for now remains out of reach. That said, when the BPM100 is working, who knows what can be imagined. Multiple engines like Rocketlab, second stage, additional minor solid boosters etc. perhaps. But orbital launches from the Baltic Sea is not an option, so there will be challenges beyond the technical part.
@AzizBike4 жыл бұрын
You guys should invest in a GTAW machine and some classes.
@jeremytravis3604 жыл бұрын
The British used stainless steel in it space program which they launched from bases in Woomera Australia.
@frankyhall12714 жыл бұрын
I think the editor is an Alec Steele fan...
@CopenhagenSuborbitals4 жыл бұрын
I can't wait until we start forging rocket engines from etched damascus steel! 😁 Best, Sarunas K.
@Eo_Tunun4 жыл бұрын
Did you consider inflatable floats for Spica's recovery, in order to shorten the time it's in salt water? Such a thing ought to be reasonably cheap and my prevent damage to the electronics.
@MrDannyd94 жыл бұрын
9:05 But after the deformation hardening there is a loss of the ductility... There is a trade off.
@XeTylerr Жыл бұрын
Are you planning on having the booster come back down and land for reuse?
@CopenhagenSuborbitals Жыл бұрын
Yes, under parachutes
@RogerGarrett4 жыл бұрын
Can you get the same properties (thinner/stronger) simply by stretching the flat plates of stainless steel before curving it into the tank shape?
@eighteenbit54284 жыл бұрын
Interesting video, and a great project! I'd like to say that 304L is not the best choice as far as corrosion protection in water with high NaCl content. 316L is a better alternative on my opinion as it has a slightly different chemical (Cr/Ni/Mo) content which improves it's resistance to chlorinated solutions. Also I am curious as far as increasing strength in order to reduce weight have you considered duplex or even super duplex stainless steels?
@justinw62874 жыл бұрын
They probably aren’t worried about corrosion/PRN in seawater for the short time it’s in the cold ocean. Bring it to shore, and rinse with some low chloride water. I believe duplex strain hardens in the same 125ksi range yield strength. The whole point of 304L is weldability and cost of the raw material. If I had to choose between aluminum and duplex at that point I’d go for aluminum. Just my thoughts, would love to hear what they say.
@arcdragon69064 жыл бұрын
Really interesting video! Does the deformation hardening effect the performance at cryogenic temperature?
@petermaersk-moller30144 жыл бұрын
I am not the expert here, but it is my understanding that the 304L hardens at cryogenic temperature. But I am not sure about if the weldings will do the same ... and testing to rupture at cryogenic temperatures is both dangerous and difficult.
@arcdragon69064 жыл бұрын
@@petermaersk-moller3014 that's cool. Hopefully not too much hardening going on then. Will be interesting to see how it turns out!
@mrmonkeboy4 жыл бұрын
Could you post some videos that dive in detail about the control and gimbaling software and sensors. I'm sure there are plenty of coders who are fascinated about this. SpaceX never answer questions on this, so I'm very interested in how much is classical algorithms and how much trained AI is used.
@yeahright73394 жыл бұрын
SpaceX is not that silly.
@jaypearce67434 жыл бұрын
You misled me to believe that the short stainless steel cylinder had been expanded to the half tank size you showed ( btw, I find the tank shape appealing as a tank and as a part of the exterior of a rocket). In reality, you're just showing the type of steel used to expand a fully formed rank.
@petermaersk-moller30144 жыл бұрын
@Jay. Actually the inner short cylinder shows the exact size the outer half had before deformation/expansion. As a consequence the outer half went from a 2mm thickness to around 1.5mm. So "the short stainless steel cylinder had been expanded to the half tank size you showed" is actually precise what happened.
@hopper1aoa154 жыл бұрын
Yeah I understand the cost constraints of titanium but there are also some excellent aluminum alloys out there that would save a lot of weight and is far cheaper than titanium ....just a thought....anyway best of luck in your endeavours....looking forward to further updates ....
@robbiejames15404 жыл бұрын
I think lox dosent like aluminum much - could be fine though.
@hmidasliman65044 жыл бұрын
As far as I know ss 304 is banned in use in many offshore and even offshore oil and gas application /specifications. All the best.
@bagheadbaby4 жыл бұрын
have you thought of using metric true bore piping systems? rather than rolling your own steel. not sure if this is an option for you
@MarsOzzie3 жыл бұрын
why starship thickness is 4mm but they not become ballons. dont you only need 8 bar pressure so why you guys using 30 bar? sorry i dont know much but seems strange that you need such big and thick tanks. you could use thinner stainless steel if you vent when reachs certain presssure.
@CopenhagenSuborbitals3 жыл бұрын
We actually give answers to all of your questions in our recent video where we pressure tested the Spica rocket tanks: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eNaKosaHurLYm3U.html
@leonplestenjak11364 жыл бұрын
Why don't you use allready hardened sheet metal (feed it trough some rollers)?
@richardvonbrecht33983 жыл бұрын
Dropping stressed austenitic stainless steel in salt water is not a good idea. Chloride stress cracking can happen leading to catastrophic failure. We take special precautions when shipping stainless pressure vessels by ocean transport. This failure has occurred at relatively low temperatures, 60 deg C.
@Spikeydelic4 жыл бұрын
Protip for Bianca... NEVER EVER wear gloves when using a strong drillpress like that.. Just imagen what would break first. bones or gears?!