Botswana was not ruled by Mugabe and his fucked up ideas. Pol Pot v Mugabe.

Botswana is amazing for Africa but in the year 2000 they did have a 38% HIV rate

Zimbabwe was never an advanced economy, only better than neighbors.

@@1wun1 Rodesia was the most developed country in Africa

Rhodesia had a lower gdp per capita then brazil, it wasn't developed at all, seriously.

👏👏👏

Yes especially the “oldest” democracy in the world in the US has shown how fragile the concept is

@@kob2337 Switzerland has actually been a democracy for quite a few more centuries than the United States. On August 1, they will celebrate 731 years of independence and democracy. The main difference is that the USA is a representative democracy while Switzerland is a direct democracy.

@@marcrcbally that’s not really true since they have been vassal states of both the French and rome empire for quite some time. The way they are today has been established in the 19 century so after the American democracy

This idea of some sort of linear 'progressive' political system - from dictatorship to oligarchy to democracy - is nothing but wishful thinking. The world isn't and hasn't ever been so neat. Democracy is not inevitable, nor is it final. History doesn't 'end' with liberal democracy, as that hack Fukuyama claims, history marches on and change is the only constant. Rwanda isn't going to become a democracy in the fullness of time, or alternately it might become a democracy tomorrow. A thousand and one factors - political, social, economic, technological and environmental - will shape its future, and what form that future takes is impossible to predict. Also Rwanda's female majority parliament is largely for show. It's not a natural result of election, but an engineered one by Kagame for the purpose of the country's foreign image. Those female legislators have virtually no power but are beholden to whim of a man.

That's because they're French

Colonisation/imperialism is not charity, it's primarily to benefit the colonialists. These people are adults and once independent they are wholly responsible for their actions.

@@1wun1 wow you clearly have no idea what you're talking about

@@davisjalappat1425 feel free to correct me

@@1wun1 that literally has nothing to do with what the comment said 🤦

Err ... Rwanda.

Rwanda

Rwanda steals from DR Congo resources.

BECAUSE RUSSIA DEMON PROVOKED IT. IN 1984 YEAR. KANTANO HABLAMANA WHO WAS STUDING IN USSAR WHO GOT JOURNALIS. HE CAME BACK IN RWANDA 1989. HE WAS AGENT OF USSAR. IT RUSSIA DEMON COUNTRY. IT RUSSIA PROVOKED GENOCIDE BETWEEN TUTSI AND HUTU

Africans

What?

This is humanity without regulation

@---TylerDurden---Have you done any research regarding Rwanda under Kagame's Rule?

Your analysis fails on a single point - almost *all* of post colonial sub Sahara history is dominated by authoritarian Governments. It is interesting that you use a single data point (Rwanda) to extol the virtues of authoritarianism when a single glance at African history will tell you that 99% of dictatorships have been utter failures that ruined their countries. And most of the countries that are actually growing - Botswana, Ghana, Nigeria, Ethiopia etc started doing so when they liberalised. Ie they are certainly not perfect democracies but their growth came in a period where they moved towards liberalization.

​@@MA-go7ee I am not entirely sure where u got the idea that I was giving a full throated endorsement of authoritarianism, since that was not the point of my comment at all. It was to point out that simply flipping over to a democracy alone is not enough to bring prosperity because what drives growth and investments is the rule of law, security and economic liberalisation (as u had pointed out), things that sometimes come with, but are not always guaranteed with democratic reforms. Too many times a country flips into a democratic system in the hopes that things would improve, but in the whole euphoria ultimately don't really change anything else, creating what can sometimes be an even worse system than the one that came before, or at best a system that is crippled by its shackles to its past. Since we're on the topic of Africa, we can look at the current data to illustrate this. Investment Monitor's African investor guides lists only Botswana and Ghana as being the only truely free democracies as rated by the Freedom Index among their top 5 countries in Africa, with Egypt, Morocco and Tanzania occupying the remaining slots. Clearly, despite having more authoritarian tendencies, these countries have somehow managed to win over investors over their more liberal and democratic counterparts in the continent. Yes, authoritarian regimes general do worse than democracies in all except a few standout cases such as China, Rwanda and some would argue Singapore. In those rare cases they do better, far more so, because they provide a better overall package to the investment community than their neighbouring peers. In all of them, they initiated economic liberalisation without the accompanying democratic reforms that would usually be associated with them, and still somehow managed to win over the business community to become or initiate the process to become economic powerhouses.

Believe that until you get a corrupt dictator that carts all your tax money to Switzerland and makes anyone who raises questions to disappear. The fact is Kagame is a good thing for Rwanda but he is also an outlier. African dictators are never benevolent.

Rwanda is just a puppet state small enough for the luxuries given to them by their overlords for doing the dirty work make the country look nice for the metrics and in the capital.

same case here in Indonesia, the government being more authoritarian but the people are more united and less sectarian. less freedom of speech so its gonna be no racism is the beginning key for a mid-low income multi ethnic country towards developement

Rwanda has received more international (financial and diplomatic) help than its neighbors, Burundi since 2005 has received the opposite.

wouldnt the negative connotations actually deter investors?

As a rwandese i agree with your statement

@@kazzz2765 initially yes, but it did attract a lot of aid. And this aid was used to create a better environment for investment.

The genocide had chased all business and none was interested in rwanda after the genocide and no financial aid could fix that so after that rwanda had to make a choice they made country one of the cleanest and safest in the world thats what attracts tourist and rwanda is known for using its aid very well since corruption is low in the country

There's plenty of violence for the entire rwandan history, but not enough on the Burundian one.

Yes, this idea that Rwanda was a peaceful country until the Belgians came is absolutely incorrect. If anything the colonial period marked a significant slow down of the violence.

@@ChilapaOfTheAmazons It didn’t. The colonial administration’s actions killed 300K in Rwanda in 1944, probably the same in Burundi. And it was the same administration that launched genocide for the very 1st time in Rwandan history (1959 - 1962). Such solid historical facts shouldn’t be fudged so casually.

@@ChilapaOfTheAmazons nah that's false. Before the Belgians there were violence but it would usually be about expanding the country (kingdom).

When you simplify this just think you're an agriculturalist and some guy comes around from no where with 50 cows to destroy your corn the simplest things can start wars it's turned into something completely different now obliviously because of the Belgiums but I'm sure this was the fight before the Belgiums 😂

The problem is that when leadership has to change the country may become unstable again. Everyone with ambition will be aspiring to be the next leader for life. I think most democracies do have a setup period but unless they lay the foundation and leave office to allow for an election it may be back to being a war torn country with poor prospects.

You got a point. The problem is if a dictatorship starves you there's no way of complaining, in a democracy you can. That's why there's almost never a starving democracy.

Rather be fed by a king than starve under a president… But I also think that african culture is more centred around monarchy than Europe…

@@NickSteffen Democracies are often unstable too. Look at how many govts. Israel has had in the last few years. Other democracies have gone through literal years without a govt. simply because they can't agree on one, stalling all policy (and sometimes even struggling to pass the annual budget!) until some sort of arrangement is reached. In advanced nations it's the (non-democratic) bureaucracy that keeps the state running during such times, but in less settled establishments it's just chaos

@@ArawnOfAnnwn Israel is one of the richest countries in the world, just because they have a coalition in power doesn’t mean it’s unstable. They are really rich, richer, than Finland, Belgium,Germany, France, Japan and the uk.

He fails to mention Rwanda is still poor by African standards too lol 🤣 You’d be much better off in a richer but less populated country like Botswana or Gabon or just a bigger and richer country like Kenya or Tanzania. Even Congo and Uganda which are poorer per capita so also poor by African standards have more general economic opportunities than Rwanda just by being bigger economies with a good amount of resources. The only resources Rwanda has are stolen from the Congo anyways.

Rwanda is so good many Rwandans don’t even want to live there 🤣

@@originalsal2141 🤡

And it’s still growing

Those peoples don’t want to evolve

That is what we call leadership, Kagame at first kicked out France because it was treating Rwanda as a colony and now Rwanda is leading francophone countries, in 2012 the west and uk withdrew all aid to Rwanda and now Rwanda is leading the commonwealth etc… a very wise and strategic leader is the one to pull strings for his country its not by western mercies.

Of coarse, these documentary rarely have the rigor to investigate the involvement of foreign countries in the ongoing military, geo-political and economical predation of the country. Stunting the industrial growth, freedom in trade and autonomous economy. It is too profitable make the mistake to let them develop by themselves. Especially when you can import fabricated problems with neighbour countries without lifting a finger and masking the true interest (minerals, trade, military control of regions close to the DRC).

Trust me this channel will find a way to antagonize him someone highlight this comment for another day.

Thank you for bringing up that Burundi has natural resources, unlike what was conveyed in the video.

I have been looking for someone who truly know what they are saying.

Compared to Burundi and Congo they're better, compared to Uganda Tanzania or Kenya they're doing bad.

@@1wun1 you're not wrong

True also we need to understand that, democracy is practiced differently around the world. Western democracy doesn't equate with African democracy

@@1wun1 bro am from uganda I know wat u mean by bad and it's getting worse .

@Plague Sentry you misread my comment

great idea

All dictatorships are not horrible and unpleasant But Rwanda is in-fact a dictatorship A good one that works for you I agree but nonetheless it is still a dictatorship

Yes it works And it’s not that bad but still it’s a dictatorship 😂😂😂

Regardless if it's a democracy or dictatorship, we hope for the continuation of the development of your country

I live in Rwanda and understand exactly why people call it a dictatorship. fact us many people know that the government isn't the best democratic one but that doesn't matter when you literally rise a country from the ashes. Rwandans are happy as conditions are better and don't really care about what the West call their precious country

if those labels dont matter to rwandans, why then you complain? 😂😂😂 I grew up in east germany, and I know how "democratic" those elections were when one party alone always got over 90% 😜

Cut the crap! Not much difference between you two

@@in.edieudonnesworld3167 well, there is.

@@animenation5324 The difference is that Rwandan poor are blocked from migrating outside while Burundians are not.

They will also get into the path of progress.Just a matter of time.

@@1wun1 sincerely, there is no factual basis to what you're saying. All borders of rwanda let all rwandans and foreigners pass, and sincerely, stop research before making such claims.

That's right!

Okay?

So has Ethiopia. And?

The ones who claim to be the most democratic are the ones who give the least freedoms. In some of these countries like USA, England and Australia we saw the real truth during the pandemic. We can't say religious beliefs, some religions are allowed to prosper while others are suppressed. We can't speak on basic biology. In the end, it's all just words. All the political parties go to work in the same office. All have it cosy and won't change anything to disturb that. A dictatorship with the right dictator would actually be more beneficial in most circumstances I'd say.

Rwanda is democratic, it has defined its own version that works well with its own fate which is "Consensual Democracy" where people have to sit together and agree on what to do instead of disagreeing in media and on streets of cause with building competitive public institutions that makes sure things are done correctly, that's why Rwanda ranks well in low corruption, good governance, security and service delivery not just in Africa but outperforms even developed countries like UK, US, Portugal, France, China, Russia, Turkey and more in some of those rankings. The issue is that the west doesn't want someone else to strive forward, or have a different working system not one dictated by them, so they use their media and power to sabotage anyone who tries to do differently.

Well said my brother As long as he is doing well for his people and his country. And his people love him Who cares if he takes more than 50 years in power. Can we compare rewanda to other Africa countries which democracy? They are far better than most African countries with democracy that full of currupt government

Aren't the human rights of dissidents not respected in Rwanda though?

@@marw9541 gotta crack a few eggs sometimes. If we were to clean up England you'd expect at least a million+ people in the shit.

No, the Rwandan monarchy was seen as bad for the defeated Hutu kings. The Burundian one was somewhat better.

@@1wun1 there weren't any Hutu Kings. never. the Tutsi, Hutu and Twa were just like social classes. Matter of fact, there are also clans which actually get passed from father to son. and it is not rare to find someone with different clans but different "ethnic" groups

@@angeloverlain king Mashira wasn't a hutu king?

@@1wun1 I don't know a king of such name. Please let me know his dynastic name and reign name.

@@angeloverlain king Mashira of Nduga. His capital city was Nyanza until he lost his life to his inlaw Mibambwe I who moved from his capital Kigali.

They also slaughtered thousands of west papuans

Lies and lies. Millions of the 1965 killing victims were mainly native Indonesians who were accused of communists, while the Chinese victims were about thousands in numbers. The USA was behind this and the general that ordered the killing was installed by USA as Indonesian most notorious dictator named Soeharto for 32 years, whose regime ended with another riot in 1998 that also killed both native Indonesians and Chinese. USA kept silent about their involvement until they revealed the story few years ago. The Papuans were also victims of Soeharto, who with the help of USA stole Papuan's natural resources by granting Freeport McMoran license to unfairly exploit Papua's resources. After Indonesia took over Freeport, the US gets angry so they armed Papuan liberation army, who also kill other native Papuans that disagree with them. Today's Indonesian government under democracy has replaced the situation and improved Papua's situation. West Papua is much more livable than PNG who is filled with crime and rape. 70% of PNG women are victims of rape.

@@kopimanisku5392 finally someone tell this story, most people don't know about the West Papuans and their fight for freedom

Exactly! I thought that was a pretty ignorant comment.

It’s a sad commentary. Unfortunately, using Africa as the yardstick for generalized backwardness works because the continent is very poor.

@@stevensmith2078 they don’t want to evolve

Same here I wish for the same I wouldn't care if he will take more than 50 years in power And long as he has his people and his country best in heart. And his country is doing fine who cares.

He arrests all presidential candidates who compete against him, look it up. Therefore he virtually contests elections against himself

One thing he didn't mention is that Rwanda already had a better economy than Burundi even before Kagame arrived, and there's more economic freedom in Burundi than in Rwanda.

Facts👍

Why?

Same kind of peoples don’t want to evolve

Very true.

There is another theory as well. Prices could be low due to lack of demand. And lack of demand is due to low income levels. Of course, the GDP per capita alone is not enough to decide the standard of living of the country. Its only one of the parameters.

@@infotainment7435 it's not another theory, it's the same theory haha

Umm no. Burundi is horrifically poor. 52% of the Children under 5 are stunted due to malnutrition. Its poverty rate is double that of Rwanda.

@@innosam123 they say that so you give moneys on charity, which they steal.

True, same case in my country also. Long ago during in dictator rule, our country were 2nd most developed in asia on that time next to japan until where the biggest manipulators and liars ruled the country. It became the exact opposite. Over democracy can be a hindrance to development.

Visual Politik seems not to understand that. It is evident in their tone

@@orvenpamonag2234 democracy itself is not a bad system just like autocracy isn’t a bad system. They all thrive under good leadership however what irks me is when people try to paint one as good and the other as evil. Democracy doesn’t work for every country Africa is a continent that is a perfect example of the failed system of democracy. Sometimes the right leader in cases like Paul Kagame and Gadafi are what’s best for a country.

No such thing as a good dictator, and political stability (and independance) can only happen with democracy, with the (temporary) leader taking power from the people which would stop coups and not allow foreign intervention.

@@samueldb684 Gadafi was a monster and the chaos happened because he wanted it to and opened the country to militias and spread weapons, just like Saleh in Yemen, peaceful transition wa perfectly possible in Libya but that loser couldn't let it happen and wanted to take revenge against his people for daring to go against him. Rwanda and Libya haven't tried democracy yet for you to say that a dictator is best for them, the same for the other countries you're implying I'm sure.

Well...maybe they don't and I hope they can eat pride because that's the only thing they have according to their economies. Rwanda did well pride is not worth starving for..

Well said

Rwanda is poor though. I'm a congolese but honestly, rwanda would be rich if that was the case but they are as poor as all the other countries in the region. Only southern Africa is somewhat developed.

@@oo--7714 Kagame and the army are very rich.

@@rafaelw8115 just because they're not going to be as rich as Singapore wealth is always relative. as far as I could tell, the current dictator relies on the productivity of his subjects to get his treasure, same as Singapore, to pay for the loyalty of his keys. For like a better term. I will say Singapore is an enlightened dictatorship or enlightened despotic government. Despite him saying that the land does no natural resources, I would argue it's a blessing, not a curse. If you look at all the oil-rich countries, they're all dictatorships because all the dictator needs to do is to take control of the oil and that is his way to raise a treasure.

@@rafaelw8115 as I said earlier, it's not to the subjects and leaders of Rwanda if they want a liberal democracy or if they went to emulate Singapore. If it's the letter case cool I am totally fine with that. That was their choice if they want to transition to a liberal republic, all dictatorships are democracies, Even better that will benefit them greatly.

@@rafaelw8115 to add it to my point, there is something called the resource curse. To oversimplify it. it is a situation where one economic resource, primarily oil, gold, and diamonds, overwhelm the economy so all a dictator has to do is take control of that to get the treasure to buy his keys loyalty. Now, let's compare that to places that don't precisely have a easily exploitable resource. They got to depend upon the productivity of their subjects, sometimes citizens, to generate the treasure to pay their keys. That is what is likely to forms a republic.

@@rafaelw8115 here's my answer to that. Why should we force a republic on a location which has no historical history of a Republic even working? The United States tried that with the Middle East and the Middle East has no functional right to have a republic due to how tribal the region is. So as I said earlier, it is in the prerogative of both the rulers and the ruled to decide what form a governance they want. Again what form of governance they choose. I don't care. It could be a dictatorship, an oligarchy, or a republic. Short version is some places just can't have a republic due to history and culture. I'm not sure if Africa, The continent, is even ready for the foundations of a republic. Never mind the actual governmental form.

@@rafaelw8115 I'm not saying it's intelligence or anything like that. I'm saying it's more cultural. The Middle East is a good example due to how tribal those societies are. Oftentimes to the point where people are more loyal to their tribe than the state. When it comes to the Africans they were too busy killing and enslaving each other. Oftentimes to a hilarious degree and you're telling me these tribes can unite to make a Republic even functional. There are several preconditions for a Republic to even exist. One of them is a strong middle class of which Africa, or the vast majority of it, Is severely lacking. Oversimplified version is I don't see any of the preconditions for a republic to form.

Low standard

you herd know

Drought is Somalia problem not Easy Africa as for Kenya the problem is corruption in distributing food in Northern parts

@@martinchege6256 no it’s the whole of east Africa

England gives far more money to the congo every year.

Same with the USA: Way more money poured into the congo every year.

@@mitchmazamez1989 Rwanda’s stolen mineral exports namely gold and coltan alone for example are worth more than any aid either country receives. And that estimate doesn’t include diamonds, tin, tungsten, cassiterite, tantalum, coffee, cacao, wood, ivory, gorillas etc. Those are the reason why people started killing in Congo after your guys’ genocide. Nothing else.

Agree 💯. I feel like if both countries start trading and cooperating with each other more, economically and politically, it will trigger be a mindset change and force things to move positively in Burundi like they have been moving in Rwanda.

Why do you think we have to learn from others? One strategy does not yield the same results, unless you have the same mindset, same goals,.. remember that our resources are not equal.

I'm also Burundian. It's true that Burundi is poor, but this guy lied on multiple occasions up in this video. Ndadaye died in 1994? Burundi has no resources? Really? How about Gold, Nickel, Uranium, Cassiterite, etc?

They also look for work in Congo which is supposed to be poorer than Rwanda 🤔

@@originalsal2141 that's even more surprising

Really?

@@2dope227 100% sure

Burundi mostly just has untapped rare earths that are waiting for the SGR train from Dar Es Salaam

A wise man he is; you should not have the right to incite mass genocide, by the way as alluded to Singapore is the poster child for this type of system and its working tremendously well, economic freedom should be the only freedom people strive for, anything else is chaos.

Yeah, but maybe not all that others need to know

@@melvinbarnett1910 did u really just say that?

My trading mentor :Mr Johnson Williams, runs an investment platform like that

Wow, that's really impressive I got Mr Johnson Williams info, how good is he?

Thanks ,I will get to him right away.

:stayhome:

:stayhome: 2222 :stayhome:

Burundi, Tanzania and Congo signed a deal to partner on a SGR train that is being built to connect everyone to the port of Dar Es Salaam. The train is about halfway built through Tanzanian but once it reaches the capital of Burundi, Bujumbura, all 3 countries will benefit since the Congolese city of Uvira is 30 minutes away. Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda and South Sudan also have a similar plan that might connect up to Ethiopia, and the Tanzanian and half built Kenyan lines are supposed to meet in Rwanda

The problems facing Africa is that we have KNOWLEDGE DEPENDENCY on people who have SUPREMACY COMPLEX mentality, to them they think Africa ASSIMILATING to the so called 'WESTERN WAYS' is the ultimate solution but actually they are our biggest hurdle since it only ensures Africans are trapped in a state I term as COLONIAL MINDSET, Let me give an example; Kenya is one of the most liberal democratic countries in Africa and as a Kenyan I have come to despise it, we are currently having an election today, people who I used to call brothers have become adversaries because politicians are using populist politics to campaign (us verses them) and this has been happening after every 5 years, The 'Supremacist' claim that division and sometimes civil war (2007 elections violence) happened because we are a young democracy but in reality it's no difference from what US experienced in 2020, Politicians started using racial politics, Democrats painted themselves as party for the oppressed while Republicans painted themselves as party for patriots and defenders of the American identity, Americans became more divided and aligned to their political parties more than to their nation to the point of destruction of businesses (BLM) and invasion of the capitol building (proud boys), The reason US never collapsed is because they have MATURED INSTITUTIONS like FBI and the US National Guards that could ensure polarization to the point of armed conflict doesn't happen unlike us who lack the budget finance and sustain such institutions, Africans we need to decolonize our minds, Firstly, their is nothing such as North and sub Saharan African case studies, our problems are actually related and simple, we all suffer from POVERTY, IGNORANCE and DISEASE that we inherited from colonization, East Asians realized it and decided to prioritize on them, for example; Kenya used to have higher living standards than Indonesia and China till 1980s when we stated to over rely on WASHINGTON CENSUS and British expatriates for policy making, while the Asian Tigers were busy building transport systems, fighting POVERTY by building factories, and defeating IGNORANCE and DISEASE by coping and to some extent stealing technological advances from western countries we were busy recolonizing ourselves, Liberal democracy, respect of property rights and restrains to immediate satisfaction are not the root cause of development but actually they are the fruits of the later. China knows this and is investing billions on the road and belt project in Africa to ensure we are connected to the global economy by reducing transactional cost of regional trade, when i see Africans getting hyptonized by WESTERN PROPAGANDA i see people who never learn from history, Kagame realized it and he stopped trying to appease WESTERN SUPREMACIST and learn from Singapore's development miracle, i do believe Burundi can learn from Rwanda, with or without a Dictator, if only they adopt a LOOK EAST POLICY, AFRICA needs to learn and ally itself with ASIA (China and India) if they want to escape the vicious cycle of underdevelopment.

Sanctions Against Burundi were minimal.

@@oirereomanga7936 What would be the point of putting them in place if they were minimal?

On the paper almost every country is a democracy, even North Korea that has literally the name "democratic" in it's official name. You have to look at what happen in the country

Even Russia it's a democracy on paper but the political opponents disappear, die or go to jail, the freedom of press it's almost non existent, the courts are controlled by the government, etc...

@@Assadar5402 means UK is dictatorship? They haven’t changed their queen. They should change their queen before calling other people dictatorship. The people of Rwanda are not complaining. Solve ur own problems, stop looking at other people problems when u haven’t solved urs.

@@vulughovalentine2020 You do realize that the Queen doesnt have any power, right?

@@vulughovalentine2020 The queen doesn't have any power

You are right...I too was disgusted by those yellow teeth,now he has good teeth

If it were that easy, my country would be richer than the middle East! 😂

That's a lot of cash please can you explain how you can make so much cash in 14 days

Please ma can you explain to me my financial is in bad situation

@@allenreyjames3796 It great time to buy and trading crypto because they will be a huge pump soon in bitcoin it will be as a dream, just whatch.

Bitcoin is being endorsed by more and more politicians, billionaires, banks and institutional investors every month.

@@anabelleavillarreal8768 Very true. Just recently fidelity said they have been accumulating bitcoin since 2014, then again, it was announced that the SEC will be approving BTC spot ETF come 2023.

Given that many of their colonies still have a wealth of resources, they still would be just as poor - only that the richest and most powerful would be richer (Equatorial Guinea is a great example of this)

@@Solo-vh9fm That doesn't justify the genocide and loot by the imperialistic barbarians. What so ever it may be, it wasn't theirs to loot to begin with.

the africans will steal the money

@@rahularya4719 you said you wondered what would happen if colonists paid reparations and I answered.

It's not about what was stolen, it's about what is done with what is left. When people say stuff like "Belgium looted Congo and that is why it is broke", I wonder whether Belgium took all the minerals in the ground. Foreigners can pay us billions in reparations but with the disorganization and corruption we still have in Africa, much of those billions will end in private offshore accounts. I see Europeans and other people say Ukraine is corrupt, you ain't seen nothing baby you ain't seen nothing before stepping somewhere in Sub-Saharan Africa where a military ammunition warehouse gets emptied by ghosts only to find the ammo in the hands of tens of rebel groups the military is dealing with.