Well, if you ever need to be pushed into another book-buying spree, I'd be more than happy to oblige...
@saintdonoghue29 күн бұрын
Hah! Haven’t you done enough damage for one week?
@TheActiveMind129 күн бұрын
You're making me jealous with all these trips to the Brattle!
@saintdonoghue29 күн бұрын
When you visit, we’ll go together! You can head straight for the Dudebro section!
@TheBookedEscapePlan29 күн бұрын
I agree with you on revisionism; when a work of history or biography states at its beginning what the current consensus is and why there is good reason to dissent and disagree tend to be exciting projects to read, because even if one does not agree throughout the reading of the revision, the experience is at the very least exciting because it trusts that you have spent time in the subject and is leaving you, the reader, to wrestle with that shared base of information to decide what an adequate interpretation of a period, an event, a life, may be.
@StephaniePatterson-jb5it29 күн бұрын
Ah! Medical mysteries. I always enjoyed the Berton Rouche pieces in The New Yorker.
@saintdonoghue29 күн бұрын
You're dating yourself!
@StephaniePatterson-jb5it29 күн бұрын
@@saintdonoghue Alas, we can’t all be sexy 28 year old influencers.
@saintdonoghue28 күн бұрын
@@StephaniePatterson-jb5it That's true! I must remember to be patient with all your Oldie McOldersons!
@kevlee5729 күн бұрын
17K subscribers! Time for a Q & A?
@saintdonoghue29 күн бұрын
Maybe it’ll go back down?
@kevlee5728 күн бұрын
@@saintdonoghue Maybe take a few subscribers out to the gravel pit?
@barbaratarbell60622 күн бұрын
Brideshead Revisited ❤❤❤
@heathergregg997528 күн бұрын
Congrats on getting a book for Shaketember this early!
@gaildoughty679928 күн бұрын
Oooo, Auchincloss! Love his work. I think The Rector of Justin, The Education of Oscar Fairfax, and The Headmaster’s Dilemma would stand up to a careful reread. And yes, I do see the pattern there. I remember when I first read The Man Behind the Book and Love without Wings; I was beguiled by his elegant prose and his knowledge of the subjects. ETA: geez, could this possibly nerdier?
@saintdonoghue28 күн бұрын
Um, no - this couldn't possibly be nerdier!
@DavidPeacockChannel29 күн бұрын
Shakespeare is listed as an actor so he must have known how to read. Who is the actor listed in the playbill? Oxford or William from Stratford?
@saintdonoghue28 күн бұрын
Well, Shakespeare isn't listed or described as an actor during his lifetime - and plenty of actors in his lifetime couldn't read much more than the bare minimum!
@DavidPeacockChannel28 күн бұрын
@@saintdonoghue 🤔 still thinking
@ednorton4729 күн бұрын
As I recall, you can visit the schoolroom in Stratford where he went to school.
@saintdonoghue29 күн бұрын
You can indeed visit the local grammar school - but there's no evidence that Shakespeare ever even visited the place, much less enrolled there!
@battybibliophile-Clare28 күн бұрын
I bought the 1st edition of the Shakespeare controversy book in the UK for an arm and a leg. It was fun, but I am unconvinced. I tend to think we will never know unless some archive comes up with additional information. I had fun arguing with the book, but am unconvinced as to th authorship, however, I would read any reasonably written book on the subject. To be honest, the important thing is the body of plays and the way the playwright develops over his career. I love the plays and can live with the uncertainty of the identity and life of writer.
@B-RollBooks29 күн бұрын
Is that the same Charlton Ogburn who wrote The Winter Beach and The Adventure of Birds?! I discovered him here on your channel last year, and I've been delighted by his books. Now I've got to find a copy of The Mysterious William Shakespeare!
@saintdonoghue28 күн бұрын
It is indeed the same Charlton Ogburn! I wait patiently for a copy of "The Adventure of Birds" to re-appear at the Brattle -
@dtemple5429 күн бұрын
Try Elmer Kelton for June on the range
@saintdonoghue29 күн бұрын
I've very much liked the Elmer Kelton I've read for earlier versions of June on the Range! But it feels like I'm being pulled to L'Amour ...
@jordanparsons570329 күн бұрын
I have a hard time seeing how anti-Stratfordian theories are founded on anything except snobbery. Shakespeare does seem to have been a petty, middle-class businessman, but to suggest that means he was incapable of writing the plays seems presumptuous.
@saintdonoghue28 күн бұрын
Hah! Oh come now! Two things: a) is there another example in the Elizabethan period of a petty middle-class businessman writing great literature? and b) is there an example anywhere in human history of a petty middle-class businessman writing works like Henry IV Part 1 or Midsummer Night's Dream (much less King Lear)? A petty middle-class businessman - one with no schooling, no languages, and no travel that can be proven - COULDN'T have written the works of Shakespeare. Not for class reasons, but just for practical reasons!
@jordanparsons570328 күн бұрын
@@saintdonoghue Yes, but the only reason you're saying there's no proof that he had any schooling is because you're already assuming he didn't write the plays! The plays themselves, attributed to him by contemporaries, are direct evidence of his literacy and of at least some schooling. Also, there's nothing in the plays that make it necessary that their writer was well-traveled. Every historical and geographical detail could have been gleaned from books. In addition, Shakespeare makes significant errors in his writings about foreign lands- the famous mention of the "Bohemian coast" in Winter's Tale, for example. Finally, whatever more the plays may be (and they are of course infinitely more) they were clearly designed to entertain and make money. They respond to trends and capitalize on contemporary events. In other words, they were written by a shrewd businessman, not a financially secure man of leisure.