Why NASA chose the Speedmaster - Best explanation you will hear

  Рет қаралды 34,360

Casual Watch Reviews

Casual Watch Reviews

4 ай бұрын

Have you ever wondered how the Omega Speedmaster became one of the most iconic watches ever? This is one of the best explanations you will find online thanks to Dave from www.scottishwatches.co.uk
Join this channel to get access to the perks:
/ @casualwatchreviews
⌚️ Amazon Watch Store: amzn.to/2Ld4Bzs
🎧 Podcast iTunes: apple.co/2KPBd0B
📷 Instagram: bit.ly/3OKK4za
Disclosures:
I use affiliate links when linking products in the video description. Casual Watch Reviews is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Пікірлер: 148
@ademyers2741
@ademyers2741 4 ай бұрын
One myth I used to repeat that turns out is wrong - That the manual wind Speedy was chosen because automatics dont work in zero gravity. The reality is that automatic chronographs didnt exist until the very late 1960s, so none were available in the early years of the Apollo program
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Yep I remember that one! The seiko pogue went to space and that was an auto chronograph I later found out.
@robertbarta4912
@robertbarta4912 4 ай бұрын
Also because automatics in most cases can still be wound and also they do work in zero gravity, they are powered by the motion of your arm.
@chronocommander007
@chronocommander007 4 ай бұрын
Inertia is perfectly capable of substituting for gravity in portering an automatic watch. They must have known this.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
The official NASA requirements for chronographs in the 1965 RFP was quote - “the chronographs may be electronically, manually or the self-winding type; however, it must be capable of being manually wound and re-set” end quote. Rolex launched the Oyster Perpetual automatic movement in 1931 so there were automatic watches for a long time by 1964 and Rolex submitted their test watches. The requirement was a chronograph which Rolex did not have an auto movement for. They submitted a Cosmograph with a manual Valjoux 72 movement (not a Daytona).
@patrickhopkinson1851
@patrickhopkinson1851 4 ай бұрын
There were no automatic chronographs in 1965 to choose from. The first automatic chronographs (Zenith, Seiko and the Breitling/ Heuer/ Buren one) came out in 1969, after NASA had chosen the Speedmaster.
@petemulhearn7787
@petemulhearn7787 4 ай бұрын
I bought a Speedmaster Professional in 1968. I was in the RAF and flying gliders at the time and needed a chrono for navigation because it was map, compass, watch and looking out the window at the time. I still have said watch, and the receipt from the NAAFI
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Well thats an awesome story in its own right.
@Redondo_dom
@Redondo_dom 4 ай бұрын
It's because there was a waitlist
@spittinvenom9843
@spittinvenom9843 4 ай бұрын
😂 i spit out my coffee, 😂
@mattkanfer7256
@mattkanfer7256 4 ай бұрын
Ha!
@giorgiodelpalatinato6718
@giorgiodelpalatinato6718 4 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 But no, the Daytona was in the race too.
@jtwu8931
@jtwu8931 4 ай бұрын
Because the AD wants to sell them Tudors.
@cqc2238
@cqc2238 4 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@ebgbass
@ebgbass 4 ай бұрын
Hi Sam- I first discovered the Speedmaster by watching your early videos including the paper clip clasp repair! Immediately loved that watch with the hesalite crystal and sapphire case back. I went on to purchase one and have never looked back, it is still my favorite and I will keep it forever; even the local Omeaga boutique staff find it to be a special model that stands out among the many other iterations. Keep up the great work!!
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Wow! Well I very much appreciate you watching for so long. Seems like a lifetime ago that first Omega video. Glad you love yours. That is the true grail I think in this hobby, finding a watch that you love year after year.
@a.j.e4349
@a.j.e4349 4 ай бұрын
... Amazing insight information. Thankyou!
@kellingtonlink956
@kellingtonlink956 4 ай бұрын
Great story. Thanks for the video.
@kronzprinz
@kronzprinz 4 ай бұрын
it's my understanding Omega didn't even know NASA had chosen them, because NASA just bought them from a local store, not from Switzerland HQ. such a great story! love it. Although it should be made clear, Casio, Rolex, Breitling, Tag Heuer, Sinn, and others have been to space and to the space station as well. not just omega. and the Omega X33 i think is the most advanced.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Yep, thats what we concluded here. Just bought it from a normal jeweller.
@Docmeff1
@Docmeff1 2 күн бұрын
Ragan goes into more detail and lists the multitude of tests used and the Omega was the only one that survived all tests and worked as it did prior to the tests. He even talks about how he serviced many kf the watches as well.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
Good dialogue and vid. I encourage people to check out the testing results of the watches, really fascinating to see how poorly some of the brands/watches fared in the tests. Granted it was the 1960’s but some of the failures with the Hamilton, Rolex and others were catastrophic. (edit: If memory serves me correctly the Speedmaster was the only one to actually “pass” all the grueling tests, not that they survived all tests since most rigorous testing goes beyond the “pass” limits. I heard that NASA was quite hopeful that the Hamilton watches would do well since it was an American watch company but alas it did not do well at all.
@patrickhopkinson1851
@patrickhopkinson1851 4 ай бұрын
Hamilton kept on trying and used Congress in an attempt to force the issue. The Omega Speedmaster kept winning though.
@jorgerobles628
@jorgerobles628 4 ай бұрын
Hamilton never got tested coz they sent a Pocket Chronograph, not a Wrist Chronograph, and that stuff that NASA was hoping for Hamilton to pass was some story that circulated at the time and was later debunked.
@jorgerobles628
@jorgerobles628 4 ай бұрын
@@patrickhopkinson1851 Sorry to say but Hamilton was not the watchmaker which insisted to have its watches tested, it was Bulova under the influence and request of General Bradley who was the President of Bulova at the time, and then Omega passed everything while the Bulova failed. And that was because Bulova was pushing the idea of Buying American Items.
@patrickhopkinson1851
@patrickhopkinson1851 4 ай бұрын
@@jorgerobles628 Thanks for the correction, it was indeed Bulova. I didn’t have the book to hand when writing the comment.
@Supercruze
@Supercruze 4 ай бұрын
I had heard that some of the early Mercury 7 astronauts; in particular Wally Schirra, wore his personal Omega Speedmaster into space on the early Mercury missions. Other astronauts caught on and purchased their own Speedmasters. I believe NASA then saw the need for a watch to endure the rigors of space travel and thus the testing program and selection process began. Ibn 1962 Scott Carpenter wore a Breitling Navitimer into space and when he exited the capsule upon splashdown the watch promptly flooded. I believe Breitling still has this watch in its museum. Not saying the Omega Speedmaster is any more water resistant.
@simonwright6882
@simonwright6882 4 ай бұрын
Fascinating information to me as an owner of a 1961 pre moon example.
@PhantomObserver
@PhantomObserver 4 ай бұрын
Fun fact: one of the problems NASA and Ragan ran into was that while the Apollo astronauts were issued the Omega watches for training on Earth, it wasn’t a permanent issue; they were expected to return the watches to NASA once the training was finished and the mission was over. A lot of them didn’t, until Ragan complained to Deke Slayton the head of the astronaut office. Slayton told the astronauts they wouldn’t be allowed to use NASA’s T38 aircraft (which they used to commute around NASA’s training sites cross-country) until the watches were returned.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
That is interesting! I didn’t know that.
@iggytse
@iggytse 4 ай бұрын
And I am guessing this is how a Bulova ended up on the moon. It was a personal watch that later got auctioned for $1.6 million.
@PhantomObserver
@PhantomObserver 4 ай бұрын
@@iggytse Not quite. Bulova was never on the original list of watchmakers NASA contacted for chronograph testing, because at the time Bulova didn’t make a chronograph that met NASA’s specifications. Once Bulova’s president Omar Bradley (yes, the former general) found out, Bulova began lobbying Congress to put NASA under a “Buy American” procurement policy so that Bulova could be put on the list of space watch providers during the next procurement cycle in the 1970s. As part of this, Bulova used their military connections to give Apollo 15 astronaut Dave Scott a prototype they developed for the next NASA set of trials. Bulova never got the prototype back because the Apollo 15 crew landed in a postal first cover scandal, and Scott was told not to return the watch to avoid giving Bulova an unfair advantage while competing for the contract.
@antonyreyn
@antonyreyn 4 ай бұрын
Great video, fun fact the first watch on the moon Buzz Aldrins Speedy was used because Armstrongs had to be left on the ship because the Bulova clock on board failed. Aldrin watch is now 'missing' after he posted it back to NASA. Then on Apollo 15 Dave Scott's Speedy 'failed' leading to him using his Bulova. So it's like a reverse. Cheers
@camarocarl7130
@camarocarl7130 4 ай бұрын
Scott's Speedy: first watch to break on the Moon.
@antonyreyn
@antonyreyn 4 ай бұрын
@@camarocarl7130 yeh but there is also the suspicion it was just a way to get an American brand watch on to the Moon. Cheers
@Bob.martens
@Bob.martens 4 ай бұрын
For the waterresistance of course:)
@paulwi57
@paulwi57 4 ай бұрын
I think Carpenters Breitling Cosmonaute was made at the request of NASA , Carpenter wanted a watch that had a 24 hour dial so one sweep in 24 hours instead of two to avoid confusion as to day or night. Also I believe Breitling was the first to have the slide rule bezel to calculate navigation. Please correct if I’m wrong
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I think we covered this is a show a long time ago. Yes very interesting story around the Breitling watch! Thanks for sending the photo!
@MadMax76er
@MadMax76er 4 ай бұрын
I cant be there for the live streams or always spare the time to rewatch at a later date so these excerpts of interesting discussions are a great idea
@davecorry7723
@davecorry7723 4 ай бұрын
Ooo, that was great!
@joshuam4614
@joshuam4614 4 ай бұрын
Wally Schirra was the first astronaut to wear a Speedmaster. He wore his own watch when he first went into space in 1962.
@lestercombs1871
@lestercombs1871 4 ай бұрын
My all time favorite Astronaut. RIP
@jorgerobles628
@jorgerobles628 4 ай бұрын
Yes, Schirra used the Omega Ref CK2998 Speedmaster.
@asleepzone5557
@asleepzone5557 4 ай бұрын
That’s the same reason I got from Omega!
@stephenoliver1437
@stephenoliver1437 4 ай бұрын
I’ve a x33 speedmaster which I believe is the official omega supply for the European Space Station for all current astronauts
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I know there was x-33 watches used for the dragon launches.
@dezinedude1417
@dezinedude1417 4 ай бұрын
So while I own a well working Seiko Pogue, the reason for choosing Omega is not nearly as intriguing as why NASA has lost all film footage of the Kubrick inspired pseudo-moon set.
@MrGrentch
@MrGrentch 4 ай бұрын
The "space watch" was pretty much an afterthought. As the chap pointed out they had a tiny budget. It was a tiny side project not considered essential for flight. If it had been they almost certainly would have approached a watch company(likely American) to build a watch specifically to their specs. Much like they had with the Bulova Accutron clocks fitted to their spacecraft NASA did consider mission critical. SR71 Blackbird pilots had already been issued Accutron watches, but Accutron didn't have a chronograph/stopwatch. An actual designed for purpose space watch would likely look nothing like a civilian chronograph. Indeed Omega prototyped an evolution of one; the "Alaska". Didn't have "Speedmaster" on the high contrast white dial, the movement was housed in a hefty squareish steel case, fitted within an anodised aluminium clamshell to protect against temperature extremes, with very large chrono pushers so an astronaut could actually operate the functions on an EVA. Something that would have been near impossible with a standard chronograph. It didn't look too dissimilar to the huge and very legible(and simple)wrist worn bomb timers of the 1920's and 30's, designed to be operated in often open cockpits of aircraft by someone wearing gloves. So similar enough operating conditions. They didn't test a multitude of watches either. They only bought four off the shelf; Omega, Longines-Wittnauer, Hamilton and Rolex. The Hamilton was a pocketwatch so was dropped as an option almost immediately. The Longines-Wittnauer and Rolex were running the same movement. Hardly a great spread of options.
@chronocommander007
@chronocommander007 4 ай бұрын
The crystal on David Scott's Speedmaster popped out during a mission.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
You mean Hesalite 😉
@chronocommander007
@chronocommander007 4 ай бұрын
@@WatchMeEDC Yes, the acrylic crystal.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
@@chronocommander007 seriously it’s just plastic… but “Hesalite” acrylic crystal sounds much better hehe.
@chronocommander007
@chronocommander007 4 ай бұрын
@@WatchMeEDC "It's not just plastic, it's Hesalite!" 😁
@ClubmanGT1971
@ClubmanGT1971 4 ай бұрын
Awesome. I finally bought mine in the 50th anniversary year of the moon landing.
@juniorjohnson5961
@juniorjohnson5961 4 ай бұрын
Did you know that Omega coined the name Hesalite for the crystal ?
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I didn't but I totally believe that!
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
Specifically because it’s not crystal… NASA didn’t want glass shattering in zero gravity then cutting/puncturing the Astronauts suits or other things… and calling it polycarbonate or plastic probably wouldn’t have helped sales much 😉
@ChrisM-lb8xw
@ChrisM-lb8xw 4 ай бұрын
Because rolex AD tried to convince nasa how exclusive daytona was. Failed 🙃
@geo8rge
@geo8rge 4 ай бұрын
Why did they need watches? They had clocks on the instrument panels, they were in contact with mission control, they could take astronomical measurements.😊
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I would encourage you to look into the moon landings a bit more. The clock on the lander actually broke. Neil Armstrong left his speedmaster behind so they could time the departure. If they didn't have that watch they could have mistimed it and missed the departure time and been stuck on the moon. Astronomical measurements wouldn't have helped them time the departure. Also, when you investigate you will find there was a delay in the commands coming from mission control and when they receive the transmissions. The Watches were actually vital to the mission.
@dad_jokes_4ever226
@dad_jokes_4ever226 4 ай бұрын
I'm guessing because money ?
@christianklein5774
@christianklein5774 4 ай бұрын
I gues i know whay omrga done that or nasa without fwien that ; might its intresting tofindout what Timex say about and iff they had off a produkt delicate tothe spaceprogram .
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
The Timex NASA used was not till the 1990s I made an upload on it here The Most Influential Timex Watch of the '90s: A Nostalgic Gem kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7yfpcZy0tTLfJc.html
@spittinvenom9843
@spittinvenom9843 4 ай бұрын
Omega been milking it ever since but I still love’em
@thecrypto3662
@thecrypto3662 4 ай бұрын
Didn't Bullova "gift" a watch to one of the astronauts?
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
Bulova was a part of the original test batch of watches. NASA was hopeful it would do well since it’s an American company but I believe it failed catastrophically during early testing.
@stuartanderws5705
@stuartanderws5705 4 ай бұрын
I thought the watches were submitted by the watchmakers for NASA to bid for the contract. Omega was the winners by a long way. There were hoping that Rolex would win. I got my Speed Master as a present to myself for getting a first in my Horology degree. Neil Armstrong's watch from the moon landing has been lost. Buz has his because he bort it from NASA. Omega still make a speed Master for NASA today but it's a bit different. I think Omega gave Buz one, I know he has one.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Hey Stuart, interested to hear more about your degree. the watches were bought from a normal jeweller, Dave discusses it in depth in this upload. Buzz's watch was the one that got lost on its way to the Smithsonian.
@stuartanderws5705
@stuartanderws5705 4 ай бұрын
@@CasualWatchReviews I guess if NASA got whatever they are selling at a store it can only get better if they improve it for space use. My Horology degree was at Birmingham School of Jewellery in England. First year is basics, second year you have repair some many clocks of each type (It would be watches but i focus on clocks) and make a platform cock and plate, balance wheel, staph and jewel mountings with jewels. 3rd year is more clocks for me and them make a clock of your desigme. Out of the 12 students in my year 10 went from Uni to work in London's large watch service centres. I like to make clock parts like 0.3Mx8 leaf pinions for carriage clocks and deadbeat escape wheels for platform escapements. But i do get a lot of Smiths striking clock types from the 20's and the 60's. My Speed Master had been back to Omega twic but still keeps worse time than a watch a fraction of its price. As soon as I find the time i'm just going to strip it myself. Something is bent inside I think, which is causing the timing trace to wonder up and down. Its loosing about 2 min a day. My 2892 looses about 5 min a month.
@i60r14
@i60r14 4 ай бұрын
Love my Hesalite Moonwatch. Just want to remind to you all that Omega is official timekeeper of the olympic games since, well forever. Omega is Omega not because of the moonwatch. The monwatch is the moonwatch because it is an Omega.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Hi! We covered the Olympics in the livestream this clip was taken from. An important part, you’re right. I would argue the moon watch is the moon watch because of NASA, who took it to the moon? As mentioned in this clip the speedmaster was designed for Italian car racing drivers.
@artkingofwholefoods74
@artkingofwholefoods74 4 ай бұрын
Should’ve have went with Seiko.
@abrahamlevi3556
@abrahamlevi3556 4 ай бұрын
Seiko came out with the 7T92 quartz movement chronograph in the 90s that nowadays can be bought on Chrono24 or eBay for 150 bucks. No other chronograph movement be it mechanical, quartz, or Meca-Quartz can surpass it in terms of its functionality and reliability. It would have been the dream chronograph watch for the low flying fast fighter pilot who flew fast dead-reckoning. It has a 60/12 totalizer with split-time capability and a build-in flyback capability. All that the pilot, wearing his watch on the right hand that holds stick on the facing him and his left hand on the throttle, had to do is to push pusher A once before takeoff and then just push and re-push bottom B to check his ATA to checkpoints along the route throughout the duration of the sortie. The chronograph would catch up automatically after every split-time measurement. No other chronograph watch is capable of that, not even the most modern ones.
@petemulhearn7787
@petemulhearn7787 4 ай бұрын
@@abrahamlevi3556 A quartz watch would be problematic if used for EVAs first because the battery would not withstand the extreme heat and cold on the outside of a space suit and secondly the electronics would be susceptible to damage by high energy particles and radiation from the sun.
@tracywilliams7929
@tracywilliams7929 4 ай бұрын
Personally I would have chosen a different watch. Ball Watches are a well respected old American brand. The Engineer II is incredibly rugged. Lives up to the motto: Accuracy under adverse conditions.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
Well it wasn’t about personal choices, the watches selected were put through extremely rigorous testing. The watch that performed the best and passed the test criteria ended up being the watch that was selected.
@Avto28
@Avto28 4 ай бұрын
Not that it matters to the legend but why does the narrative comes off as to somehow diminish the achievement of Omega if a random selection at a random jeweler performed better (broke less) than all other brands.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Hey! Thanks for watching. I’m not sure I follow what you’re asking. Are you saying that omega are making too much of the history?
@trisinogy
@trisinogy 4 ай бұрын
It’s even more amazing that modern tech fails at repeating moon landing… We’ve barely managed to land a few rovers over there, while in the 60s we sent dozens of people who spend days (!!!) on the Moon. Ain’t that unbelievable?
@tracywilliams7929
@tracywilliams7929 4 ай бұрын
That is not the original photo from the 1960s. The original shows Aldrin wearing a different watch probabl from his personal collection. To me it looks like a Bell pressurized but I am not saying it actually is one. It has more of a super elliptical face. This omega was doctored in as part of an advertising campaign. I assume Aldrin was compensated for it. I noticed the difference right away because Aldrin is my favorite astronaut and I always admired the original photo.
@dreamtube3433
@dreamtube3433 4 ай бұрын
Well, I had 3 Speedys ( Day-Date, steel with 9300 movement and the current one with the 3861 movement). After owning Panerai, Breitling, Tudor over the years I have to say Omega was the worst brand by far. Only the one with the 9300 movement ran pretty much without issues. The worst was the 3861 caliber (chrono got stuck or didn't run properly, whole watch stopped being almost full wound.etc..A nightmare and it spend 4 months in repair. My opinion, never ever Omega. And the Speedmaster on the moon had a Lemania movement, obviously a quite good one...
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I had a speedy for 10 years without issue. The service only took 6 weeks. I also know a fair few omega collectors, some you can see on my livestreams (and ask directly) I have never heard of someone having that many issues, very sorry to hear that.
@dreamtube3433
@dreamtube3433 4 ай бұрын
@@CasualWatchReviews Hi, well I know some watchmakers in Prague and Vienna that say the same thing. Omega is trying to keep the historical movement but also simultaneously innovating and changing the caliber. Which leads to problems. It seems to me that the issue is the same like with the " Land Rover Defender" A so called legendary car. But it is a piece of s... People love to spend money on stories (moon landing) packaged in products.....That is called marketing after all. I will write you a list of what keeps in breaking in the 1861 movement the most, for example.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Yep, I will mention it on the livestream if we cover the subject again if you do. Thanks for watching.
@TheStefmcd
@TheStefmcd 4 ай бұрын
I was told Bulova had submitted a new model that was designed for the moon missions but it failed NASA's tests, prompting them to grab existing models from other btands off jewellers shelves for testing. Is this nonsense?
@jonjanson8021
@jonjanson8021 4 ай бұрын
The Omega failed so he had to use a Bulova. Bulova had been given the contract for the spacecraft timing modules and it's government policy to distribute contracts over a range of manufacturers.
@armandogomez2677
@armandogomez2677 4 ай бұрын
I heard the bulova accutron was the best one for the job but omega paid nasa more money so they won. Despite it not the best one. In an attempt to still go into space they created a custom one off model and gave it to one of the astronauts whose omega broke and he had to use his bulova
@jonjanson8021
@jonjanson8021 4 ай бұрын
I guess Omega can claim to be the first watch to malfunction on the moon.@@armandogomez2677
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
Bulova was not one of the 4 brands that entered into the final NASA testing. They were Rolex, Hamilton, Longines and Omega.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
@@armandogomez2677 it was his personal Bulova. Astronaut Dave Scott on Apollo 15 wore it along with his Speedmaster as a back up and good thing because the Hesalite “crystal” popped off so he used his backup watch at his timekeeping device.
@alvarocoutinho3103
@alvarocoutinho3103 4 ай бұрын
Hehehe… except for the fact that none of those guys ever set foot on the Moon.
@muds1123
@muds1123 4 ай бұрын
They paid for it. Which is the Omega strategy. Doesn’t have the brand value of Rolex.
@jackthompson8377
@jackthompson8377 4 ай бұрын
If only this was in English
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
You should be able to activate the subtitles if you struggled at any of the parts. I will go back in and double check they are correctly worded.
@HansZarkovPhD
@HansZarkovPhD 4 ай бұрын
Lowest bidder, like every government contract.
@QatarVegan
@QatarVegan 4 ай бұрын
So Omega cheaper than Timex then?
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
That is not how the watches were selected. It was solely based on which model passed the rigorous test requirements.
@denbo74
@denbo74 4 ай бұрын
The Daytona failed yet that models seems to have done just fine over time
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Yes, good point!
@jamesbastian3826
@jamesbastian3826 4 ай бұрын
You don’t have to deal with 250°F temperature on earth. Rolex couldn’t take the heat.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
The Daytona was not the chronograph submitted by Rolex though. The Daytona came out in 1963 and was probably brand new or not yet even available at the time of NASA requisition to Rolex USA to submit test pieces.
@denbo74
@denbo74 4 ай бұрын
@@WatchMeEDC no one submitted any models. NASA purchased several brands on their own at Jeremy stores and tested them. The Daytona was tested and failed. The Speedmaster did the best and was chosen.
@WatchMeEDC
@WatchMeEDC 4 ай бұрын
@@denbo74 the Daytona was NOT submitted by Rolex. It was a Cosmograph with a Valjoux 72 movement. It failed multiple test but the hands melted during high temp test causing the watch to be inoperable. And Rolex was officially asked to submit watches along with 10 other manufacturers. 4 agreed to participate in the official NASA RFP.
@diego646464
@diego646464 4 ай бұрын
So Rolex didn’t go to the moon, and is still a very successful brand, for other reasons. So if Omega had not been chosen, it would still exist… without the moonwatch !!! 😊
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I think this is a hard one because a lot of brands died off or got bought, Heuer for example. Omega lean so heavily into the Space connection it’s hard to imagine where they would be without it.
@luckypennynumber7207
@luckypennynumber7207 4 ай бұрын
Casio g-shock! Is the best 😤
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
A lot of them are used in space but the G-Shock was released in 1983, the moon landing was 1969
@diego646464
@diego646464 4 ай бұрын
What’s new about this? This has always been the official story. Thank you for the time waste. 😂
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
Your welcome and thanks for watching!
@petersullivan3012
@petersullivan3012 4 ай бұрын
Because Omega gave NASA a load of money to use them, it's called promotion. Same as Fisher with the Space pen, totally unesessary but NASA went with it for some reason, whereas the Russians just used pencils.
@illyth63
@illyth63 4 ай бұрын
Sorry, but almost everything in your comment is incorrect. Omega didn't pay NASA, nor did Fisher. If companies could simply pay NASA to use their products, NASA would be WAY better funded than it is. NASA doesn't even get money from the sale of products which use their logo (of which there are MANY, globally). The "for some reason" that NASA used the Fisher space pen is simply because it DOES actually work better than other ballpoint pens in microgravity. NASA also used pencils, especially mechanical pencils. Soviet cosmonauts used ballpoint pens and grease pencils -- the latter is extremely preferable to wooden pencils. Graphite can conduct electricity and create hazards in a spacecraft.
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
You heard from Dave who spoke with James Raegan. He is the guy who did all the testing for NASA. He bought the watches and tested them himself. Omega didn’t pay him or NASA to select the watch. These watch companies were not the massive companies they are today back than. The truth is the watches did perform well, in fact one speedmaster made sure they didn’t die up there when the onboard mission clock failed.
@miabeatz80
@miabeatz80 4 ай бұрын
Funny that some folks get tired of a brand celebrating it's achievements while other brands come up with cool nicknames instead 😂
@ALL-il1sw
@ALL-il1sw 4 ай бұрын
If paying was all it would take, they would have ended up with Rolex
@illyth63
@illyth63 4 ай бұрын
@@ALL-il1sw I'm not sure Rolex was the richest watch company in the 1960s. They were well regarded, but nothing like the market dominators they are today. I couldn't quickly find any data, but I'd bet other major brands probably had more cash to spend on something like that. If it was just a matter of marketing budget, it probably would have been Timex or someone like that.
@markgiles8527
@markgiles8527 4 ай бұрын
No one went to the moon, so who cares. Great watch but. 😂
@CasualWatchReviews
@CasualWatchReviews 4 ай бұрын
I clearly watched a documentary series where Wallace and Grommet had a picnic on the moon.
@spittinvenom9843
@spittinvenom9843 4 ай бұрын
A few did and the earth 🌍 is ….. no flat
@jorgerobles628
@jorgerobles628 4 ай бұрын
Yeah, and some people still believe that earth is flat, and the sun revolves around the Earth, and humans come from spontaneous generation.....
@jorgerobles628
@jorgerobles628 4 ай бұрын
@@CasualWatchReviews What a coincidence, I too watched it!!! Great documentary and the best proof Armstrong and Aldrin and the rest went to the Moon!!!!!
@antonyreyn
@antonyreyn 4 ай бұрын
So the Russians were Americas biggest enemies at the time and also trying to get to the Moon but they didn't call it fake despite having the spying ability to steal all our Nuclear secrets! Unyet we should believe Internet rumours Cheers from Mars
@WilliamInternational
@WilliamInternational 4 ай бұрын
Nobody ever walked on the moon, so Omega should remove that stupid writing on the back of the watch.
@phill.2924
@phill.2924 4 ай бұрын
Yes, and all the hundreds of pounds of moon rock that were returned from the moon missions that have no earth origin were a collection of meteorites. The same for the "faked" photos of the lunar reconnaissance orbiter that photographed each Apollo landing site. Maybe you should look into which scientists, even today, use the laser bounce experiment that is still activated on the surface of the moon.
@petemulhearn7787
@petemulhearn7787 4 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
How are they getting away with this? IFL Steamboat Willie Watch
6:22
Casual Watch Reviews
Рет қаралды 8 М.
1❤️#thankyou #shorts
00:21
あみか部
Рет қаралды 88 МЛН
Stupid Barry Find Mellstroy in Escape From Prison Challenge
00:29
Garri Creative
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Why field watches are the only real tool watches left
14:43
This Watch, That Watch
Рет қаралды 207 М.
Luxury Fashion Is For Broke People
11:22
RAISED
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
10 Watches Used In Space
16:25
Wrist Action
Рет қаралды 60 М.
The Surprising Psychological Effects of Wearing a Watch
8:16
Rampley & Co
Рет қаралды 472 М.
Which Omega Speedmaster Should You Buy???
9:05
Federico Talks Watches
Рет қаралды 30 М.
Cosmic Timekeeping: Digital Watches in Space
10:01
Illuminating Watches
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Parents' Breakfast Rescue Mission for Laptops
0:28
123 GO! CHALLENGE
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ С БОМБОЧКАМИ ДЛЯ ВАННЫ
0:28
Homemade Professional Spy Trick To Unlock A Phone 🔍
0:55
Crafty Champions
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН
Kashvi gir gayi 🥲 (she is fine now)
0:25
Cute Krashiv
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
Ela pulou em uma banheira cheia de coca?!😱 #shorts #challenge
0:22
Gabrielmiranda_ofc
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
king fish hunting in see #fish#fishingvideo #
0:59
PRINCE NIAZ ALAM
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
A AMIZADE DAS GÊMEAS É MUITO ENGRAÇADO
0:10
Teen House
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН