I used to be VERY impressed with Russian military hardware but after their performance in Ukraine it is obvious that their capabilities were greatly exaggerated.
@lexburen5932 Жыл бұрын
or the mainstream media is very exaggerated
@locoman888 Жыл бұрын
Or what or where you getting your information is propagandized.
@nabobcisav918716 күн бұрын
True
@aestheticallyprottoy65883 жыл бұрын
Soviet ships are not that big but highly packed with complex weapon systems
@gagi11653 жыл бұрын
Yes
@gagi11653 жыл бұрын
Bat petar Veliki and admiral Nahimov are bigest ship's in the world today
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien15203 жыл бұрын
@@gagi1165 with modern systems and energy hungry sensors and requirement for long deployments we may see a return of CGNs in the USN It was the USN that built the first CGNs in the world
@CR1T1KaL7143 жыл бұрын
@@gagi1165 false
@X.Y.Z.073 жыл бұрын
@@gagi1165 to be specific.. Largest surface combat non-carrier ship... Its not the largest ship in the world, as many Cargo ships can easily be bigger than even an Aircraft Carrier..
@davidbridge56523 жыл бұрын
The Russians do seem to be able to pack on alot of weaponry
@cesaravegah37873 жыл бұрын
Yup, how reliable are such ships remains kind of dubious however.
@waterboi81973 жыл бұрын
Russian ships may be more armed than other ships of other country’s but that comes at a cost of dry dock repairs and rearm and refit time as it’ll take longer to get add on to the ship due to the tightly packed weapons and sensors.
@ruslankazimov6222 жыл бұрын
Because Russian ships lose edge on numbers, the quality of materials, high tech electronic and also also shipbuilding skills are lagging behind of those on western world. So they can't compete using same So they have to focus on slightly different doctrine, where they can use more ground/aviation tools like big auto-cannons, missiles (which Russia is good at and has capability to produce in sheer numbers). It's also about US and UK having a strong naval tradition that have passed from generations to generations. Russian sailors never really proved themselves in battles and never made name for themselves. The only CV Russia have is literally stuck in never ending loop of fires + dock collapsing and etc. Lot's guns means lot's of ammo and electric wiring spread all over ship and which is not really very safe. Also in cases if ship takes battle damage ... like a rocket lands on deck... there is high chance that guns packed tightly and not protected with thick armor will suffer damage as well. Not to mention that many guns also requires more crew, which increases other problems like not "enough man to fight fires" or help with repairs. If Russia reduces the number of guns... Then they won't be able to engage that many allied ships.
@sushilover13562 жыл бұрын
A lot of weapons are also hidden dangers, one malfunction may kill everyone and sunk these ship or 1 hit to one of these weapon may cause total destruction to the ship.
@wengelder92562 жыл бұрын
@@cesaravegah3787 since last week we know , albeit it was a different type of warship , that Russia s navy is not that impressive . Sunk by missiles or on board explosion …. Not much difference
@Krypton19963 жыл бұрын
It's still the beast for Russian Navy.
@drawingdead90252 жыл бұрын
25Km SAM, that's a big issue.
@bigbob16993 жыл бұрын
With so many weapon systems jammed all over the ship , I would hate to see a fire or battle damage get out of control .
@joem800033 жыл бұрын
When I was in the Navy Soviets packed a lot of weapons on their ship in the 1980's the disadvantage is the maintenance salt water and apathy can be unknown variables.
@T02myRu2 жыл бұрын
Did not know that Ireland was part of USSR.
@The_last_prime2 жыл бұрын
@@T02myRu 🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣
@johnknapp9523 жыл бұрын
We spent 3 weeks trailing the Minsk and her two escorts, a Sovremenny and Udaloy class ships in the western Pacific in '85. It seems like half the time the Minsk and Sovremenny ships were dead in the water with black smoke spewing from their stacks. The ages of these three ships combined was less than that of our Know class FF and they seemed to be in terrible shape.
@shoubhikvarman32283 жыл бұрын
Well sir in the 80's & 90's their economy was in a terrible condition so the concept of servicing was thrown to the wind due to which the Soviets & later Russian Navy had many issues and accidents think you know that
@johnknapp9523 жыл бұрын
@@shoubhikvarman3228 Makes you wonder about the state of the weapons systems also. Also with all those weapons and the men required to maintain and operate them, that doesn't leave much room for the crew. Then again, crew comfort was always low priority for the Soviet/Russian military.
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien15203 жыл бұрын
@@johnknapp952 I was an Oliver Hazard Perry sailor and I can tell you surprisingly the soviet ships were actually better and more comfortable for the crew , none of this 64 guys sharing 3 toilets and 2 doorless showers like the frigates I served on
@johnknapp9523 жыл бұрын
@@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520 So how many Russian ships have you been aboard? I've served aboard my share of ships (with LAMPS Detachments) and know the good and bad of them. But the Soviet military has never been know for crew comfort. Just ask any tankman or infantry that had to squeeze into a BMP. And with all the weapons that they throw onto their ships doesn't leave a lot of room for the crew. Also Russian sailor says "You had showers!!" 😂
@iumbo12343 жыл бұрын
@@johnknapp952 Don't forget that the Typhoon submarines have a sauna and even a fucking swimming pool inside.
@austria58922 жыл бұрын
its an all purpose warship capable of maybe simultanously engage multiple types of threats in a single sortie or engage next target once the preceding target have been dealt of without using another dedicated warship to the job
@augustofernandez19993 жыл бұрын
i like it, i would got rid off the back cannons, make it space, and modernize it with vls för Kalibr. still is a fucking monster.
@georgeantabi60252 жыл бұрын
What an idea, this would definitely prolong the life of these legends, but the problem is that the shipyards are too busy modernizing other ships.
@vikingsmb Жыл бұрын
the guns are good for use as shore bombardment
@orphidian113 жыл бұрын
3:14 turret was pointing to the mast
@valamaas3 жыл бұрын
You need to make the video longer (or footer screen) because KZfaq overlays suggested videos while you are still presenting. ⭐⭐⭐
@lingth2 жыл бұрын
Russian vehicles tend to favor more firepower than their NATO counterparts . same for armed Helicopters like Mi-24 Hind, or Kirov cruisers or battle cruisers
@Jhay_073 жыл бұрын
I used this ship in cold waters 2 I liked it.
@SauceMaster21572 жыл бұрын
Maintenance is probably a nightmare
@S.Hunter2792 жыл бұрын
A model of ship design excellence, which modern Russia has not been able to properly replace. As of 2022, only 2 Sovremennyys remain in service, out of a total of 21. Russia has, of course, the powerful Kirov-class cruisers (1 in service), the 3 Slava-class cruisers and the 8 Udaloy-class destroyers, but they pale in comparison to the US Navy's surface fleet, comprised of 22 Ticonderoga-class cruisers and 70 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Even if we forget about aircraft carriers, this means that Russia is not ready to fight the Americans in a surface action. What made these Soviet designs so excellent, in my opinion, is that they were defensive weapons, conceived to counteract the strengths of the American fleet. But the new frigates and corvettes, besides being too small, are essentially offensive weapons, optimized for launching Kalibr missiles, although they can be equipped with Oniks and Zircons.
@audiquattros-rf1of2 жыл бұрын
Yea.... so strong that it got promoted to a submarine.... lol
@hoangcanhthanh17572 жыл бұрын
If u r playing morden warship, U will know that this ship is quite good
@richessery84752 жыл бұрын
Looks good but that is about it. Russian ships suffer from poor build quality, unreliable power plants, leaking hulls and most of all malfunctioning weapons. Add in a mainly conscript crew and you have inefficiency all round.
@barracuda70182 жыл бұрын
Russian weapons in general are hugely overrated propaganda assets.
@SKCCP2 жыл бұрын
Maybe 35-40 years ago, but not now.
@emielemiel2633 Жыл бұрын
Nice yacht for Fred Flinstone
@NSomchai2 жыл бұрын
What are they afraid? The floating steel?
@khanhonam71963 жыл бұрын
the soviet navy loved large ships
@victoreous6263 жыл бұрын
Then they must really like the 11 American Super Carriers.
@khanhonam71963 жыл бұрын
@@victoreous626 russian cruisers food are those 11 Super Carriers. Those cruisers were developed to destroy u.s carriers
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien15203 жыл бұрын
Soviet surface fleet was mostly small corvettes, fast attack craft and frigates Norman Polmars books on the soviet navy go into detail , off the top of my head I’m pretty sure Soviets had 2700 ships in the early 80s but side by side comparison with the USN the US had more tonnage
@maxt75253 жыл бұрын
I believe they are upgrading these ships with vls systems and new anti ship missiles right?
@6dvc3 жыл бұрын
No, they're updating the Udaloys
@elitedima96722 жыл бұрын
Modernized udaloy has total 24x missiles
@emilcoelho15363 жыл бұрын
what happen about my c130 hercules videos?
@adolfshitler2 жыл бұрын
"feared" as in past tense? Means they no longer fear them!
@loyalist57362 жыл бұрын
How the Hell do they keep up with the maintenance on all these systems ?
@gamm89392 жыл бұрын
they don't. They scrap a lot of ships or let systems unused. Packing that many weapons on a ship is awful for reliability, rearmament, and a security hazard, because if a fire happens on one of these ships, its basically a write-off
@belikumari68932 жыл бұрын
It's called "Ushakov" in modern warships if y want to fully experienced this ships and it's capabilities then i will recommend y to try 🔥🔥Modern warships 🔥🔥 it's a versatile and dangerous both. But in this vids, where is russian kashtan AA defense sytem 🙏🙏 more capable then AK-130. 🔥🔥. That's for now 👋👋
@nikosifantis95262 жыл бұрын
Τελικά ένας πυραυλος χρειάστηκε.. .... Τώρα έγινε υποβρύχιο
@darthvodder74262 жыл бұрын
The Moskva has reached its final destination! The bottom of the Black Sea!😀
@user-co4ky8fe4l2 жыл бұрын
動力に蒸気タービンを採用しているせいで稼働率がウダロイ級よりも低くなってて不憫な艦
@user-dq6yk5fd8c3 жыл бұрын
【现代级】当年中国也把他当个宝,现在不配给052d洗个澡
@jurgenmuller1432 жыл бұрын
LOl, outdated ship with a huge radar silhouette, would be spammed with missiles without even knowing from whom.
@user-xj3ve7wt8k2 жыл бұрын
And now... he is under the sea :)
@ronaldmarcks18423 жыл бұрын
One EMP weapon would knock this legacy class out of the park. I respect the Russian military, but it is completely underfunded.
@duurnamets96783 жыл бұрын
The problem of NATO & US is always they underestimate the Russian Army.
@riptide91262 жыл бұрын
The thing is do you think you can get so close to such a warship for an emp attack? its defenses can spot you hundred of kms away
@riptide91262 жыл бұрын
Emp attack is the last thing that a ship has to worry about, AShM launched from other warships, subs an jets are a much bigger threat
@duurnamets96782 жыл бұрын
You talk about a country that can destroy the whole world 100 times with his Nukes.
@duurnamets96782 жыл бұрын
You totally wrong Russia has one of best radars. If it comes to a war between Nato&US then is over for mankind. They will destroy eachother. So many Nukes and a Chain Reaction of wars world wide.
@curtiscarpenter98812 жыл бұрын
Krakatoa a device smaller then a can of cola can sink a ship invented by Sidney Alfred would be the UK's leading line of defence against this showpiece/centrepiece.🎋
@danigreatprogresslana5703 жыл бұрын
Nice
@kempmt13 ай бұрын
Was a VLS made for the SA-N-7 Gadfly?
@jerzkos13012 жыл бұрын
Ja też się obawiam. Mianowicie tego, że rozpadnie się w pierwszym lepszym sztormie, bo to w końcu stara, by nie powiedzieć, przestarzała konstrukcja....
@MrCetirizina2 жыл бұрын
with "buksir" escorting this miracle
@BossModeGod2 жыл бұрын
I’m gonna need one of those ALL NEW 100% WEATHERPROOF BearSkin brand hoodies, to try out & see if I’d like to infact purchase☝️🤤
@TriXelOne2 жыл бұрын
three em eighty 3M80 is the designation, not Em three eighty M380
@dataman67442 жыл бұрын
It's a beast
@mohammedines61822 жыл бұрын
Je peu vous aidez à le perfectionner et le moderniser pour qu'il soit un destroyer porte hélicoptères d'attaques et de soutiens opérationnel efficace .
@MrCetirizina2 жыл бұрын
even the RF submarines are escortoded by "bucsires" ))
@henryvacal74022 жыл бұрын
It's still a beast.
@gamm89392 жыл бұрын
that goes down if its hit by basically anything and has an incredible chance of failure. One little fire and you can scrap the ship
@ENGBriseB2 жыл бұрын
40 years old.
@tasarasgoku3 жыл бұрын
Armed to the teeth!
@moffgideon22133 жыл бұрын
Lots of mistakes
@josedurin11252 жыл бұрын
My god, it's so much heavy armament, 😐🐻🐻🚀🚁
@mydearcod96392 жыл бұрын
Old school shit.
@rael54693 жыл бұрын
With so many different weapon systems they must not have much ammo for any each of them. I would think that their ...how would you say it?....battle duration wouldn't be that long. I would think that they would run out of ammo faster than a US ship. No?
@adrianotaylor72302 жыл бұрын
i think they would be in a fleet with replenisment ships with food and extra munitions also the russian navy is to protect the shores not to really go out far in the ocean
@Nothing_._Here2 жыл бұрын
Each AK 630 has 2000 rounds. with 8 belts of 2000 rounds stored internally in the ship for reloading the turrets. Each AK 130 has 340 rounds Each RBU-1000 has 24 rockets. It's more than enough.
@rael54692 жыл бұрын
@@Nothing_._Here Totally fascinating N.H. Thanks.
@dureteheiral17932 жыл бұрын
@@Nothing_._Here i wish that NATO warship capable of hunting submarine also equipped with similar ASW mortar as good as RBU-6000, but apparently most NATO ASW ships relies mostly to ASROC..
@williamhutchinson72 жыл бұрын
In reality it not much different from others, just looks crammed with evrything on
@stormtrooperanimations32412 жыл бұрын
1:52 tanjung perak :)
@4rct1c9Ic3m4n3 жыл бұрын
1:21 Smoke belcher
@saworieza3 жыл бұрын
The AK630 suspiciously looks like Daleks ... well .. sort of
@drawingdead90252 жыл бұрын
Very short range SAM system.
@Grogag6842 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣no need nato warship to turn it to submarine.......remake of this video is require after 9 months...
@gergelylovaszi94532 жыл бұрын
zumwalt class ?
@000pete92 жыл бұрын
Top sea dog? really?.you are the expert.
@MrShrog3 жыл бұрын
Hello there
@xdboiii48333 жыл бұрын
General Kenobi
@marklinsdell75272 жыл бұрын
Why don't we build them then
@Trojan03042 жыл бұрын
Why can’t the aircraft carrier go to sea, just saying.
@ahmadmersarani37672 жыл бұрын
Russian developed most advanced electronic weapons inspire slow electronic production of Russia.
@user-xb2eq1cg6l2 жыл бұрын
Aren't you afraid the Chinese 052D will think it's made of paper?
@winbear74232 жыл бұрын
What do you mean?
@fredsaga37082 жыл бұрын
And Sovremenny is the most outdated warship in today's Chinese navy. (4 active in China, 2 active in Russia)
@winbear74232 жыл бұрын
In fact, the Chinese navy has upgraded the Sovremenny destroyers it has by installing the YJ-12 with a 250km range instead of the 120km Moskit like the original Russian.
@ayane72832 жыл бұрын
Hmmm
@gweltuz34453 жыл бұрын
The best ship of wargame red dragon
@johnekk15602 жыл бұрын
จรวดร่อนไม่เคยกลัวเรือ.
@user-xx6hg1eo8m2 жыл бұрын
اي نوع من العلف تأكله انت؟،العلف الروسي ،او العلف الفرنسي.
@lustrousmetal36772 жыл бұрын
Dang!
@danialshazly75472 жыл бұрын
so why nato feared this ship? nothing said about that
@marcwitt85072 жыл бұрын
All top heavy …
@quymaitv77552 жыл бұрын
Tầu nè của Nga có nhiều hỏa pháo và tên lửa mạnh nó bắn vỡ đầu thì Nát to sơ chứ sao
@halgaci3 жыл бұрын
The anti aircraft missile's maximum range is just 25km. Can it survive the antiship missiles equipped by western navies?
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien15203 жыл бұрын
That’s the surface variant the naval variant is just over 30km ( still piss poor ) This destroyer isn’t an AA ship its design was more so an ASUW ship with a strong NGS capability for amphibious operations , their Self defence systems are really good but they’re definitely not an air warfare platform , I hope this helps with your question
@pikapikacool3 жыл бұрын
There are also 4 ciws system..
@gamm89392 жыл бұрын
@@pikapikacool which are old and unreliable, and their ability to shoot down modern missiles is doubted a lot. Gun based CIWS is far worse than things like Rim-116
@pikapikacool2 жыл бұрын
@@gamm8939 still better than nothing.. and how gun based ciws works, they don't need good accuracy, they just need to create screen of bullets to protect the ship..
@gamm89392 жыл бұрын
@@pikapikacool which is a highly debated tactic. what do they do if they fly in low? It doesn't seem like they can shoot that low. If you come from the front or the back it's literally impossible for them to shoot down the missile. A RIM-116 and Seas Sparrows in VLS are far more capable, and the west is far closer on laser CIWS than Russia. Also, you guys are missing my point. My point is that packing that many different systems on a ship like in a sandbox game makes the ship unreliable, hard to work on and dangerous
@Onesweettone Жыл бұрын
We all know today they are not dangerous at all.. and easly sinks
@jbhk79773 жыл бұрын
Look outside, look at the world . . . maybe the army should start concerning about the const*tut*on and the people instead of showing off what the tax payer payed for.
@66Falko2 жыл бұрын
Deutscher Untertitel-englische gesprochen?!
@miodragvesovic23912 жыл бұрын
Rusija je zakon.
@worldoftancraft3 жыл бұрын
Learn to use transcriptions, and look to the stressings, because right now you sound as a typical English speaker - not a narrator/speaker.
@Military-TV3 жыл бұрын
Well get to work making your own video and talk about it all you want.... It takes a special kinda whineyass person to complain about a completely free video that you watched on a completely free app... 😭
@victoreous6263 жыл бұрын
@@Military-TV Better to ignore criticism if you can't receive it graciously. You see, I took his critique as being constructive, albeit crude in delivery. PEACE
@dkhang72743 жыл бұрын
Great video. But now I gotta convert kilometers and kilograms into pounds and feet so I can have better context to the many sizes and weights I love learning new things. Thanks for the vid.
@worldoftancraft3 жыл бұрын
@@victoreous626 The problem is that 3 replies of greatly explained and elaborated criticism... they did disappear.
@victoreous6263 жыл бұрын
@@worldoftancraft But of course. Welcome to 2021 censored communications. Perhaps I should have kept out of the comms here.
@user-qo8jn9re7o2 жыл бұрын
لا الاه الا الله محمد رسول الله
@olihsv40472 жыл бұрын
Scared? This is a old battel ship
@pocholokhan77182 жыл бұрын
Russia created Titanium Submarine
@robertosovietunion75673 жыл бұрын
Now Sovermeny have been refurbished by the CHINA PLA NAVY
@paulsteaven3 жыл бұрын
PLA-Navy has better destroyers now compared to this Soviet relic.
@frankwong73912 жыл бұрын
Just fly a drone and sink it
@rahmatsyahnusfi69462 жыл бұрын
As Yg TAKUT dgn RUSSIA, sehingga As Seret ANGGOTA NATO UTUK SERANG RUSSIA
@isakhanofbengal59363 жыл бұрын
Only 4 Anti-Ship missile?!??!?
@enhancedutility2663 жыл бұрын
8 total
@isakhanofbengal59363 жыл бұрын
@@enhancedutility266 no air defence system?
@enhancedutility2663 жыл бұрын
@@isakhanofbengal5936 it does the SA-8 gadfly
@isakhanofbengal59363 жыл бұрын
@@enhancedutility266 range?
@mosesgoldbergshekelstien15203 жыл бұрын
8 x AShMs ( normal for a destroyer ) 2 x GMLS with a magazine total of 48 SAM missiles 2 x 130mm dual main guns 4 x CIWs ( most destroyers of 80s only had 1 CIWs ) It’s a heavily armed ship for that size
@gregophilip68582 жыл бұрын
just take the ship out with planes
@MrCetirizina2 жыл бұрын
that
@joeshaji46032 жыл бұрын
XB 70 will destroy this ship without any trace
@squidysnose692 жыл бұрын
It dosent exist
@K-Kratos3 жыл бұрын
ok
@Brunovieira20113 жыл бұрын
Cadê a tradução para português do Brasil
@mariuszm80652 жыл бұрын
czemu tylko tytuł jest po polsku ktoś tu w ch..a leci
@aseptzy32422 жыл бұрын
Sulit Dimengerti
@markgiannorberte12 жыл бұрын
Ushakov
@andrewlambert72462 жыл бұрын
Believe it or not but Nato has reason to fear every Russian ship if they have hypersonic missiles.
I want to see Russia war vs NATO & America at European Land, i hope America give permission for F22 join that war, so we can see SU-57 vs F22 & F35 Submarine Fighter Jet
@abhishekbhat93702 жыл бұрын
In modern warships it's varyag 😂
@robertoaseremo41632 жыл бұрын
Number of these Russian Navy Soviet era Soveremeny Class Destroyer have been Refurbished by the Chinese PLA Navy just like Liaoning Class Aircraft Carrier Chinese PLA Navy first Aircraft Carrier that they have refurbished from the Russian Navy