Why No Weapons In Space?
Рет қаралды 1,054,166
5 жыл бұрынWhatever you need a website for, create yours today with Wix: www.wix.com/go/infographics
In war, the 'high ground' refers to the most strategic position available on a battlefield, and its occupation and exploitation gives the force occupying it major military advantages. With the dawn of the space age, it quickly became clear that the space around earth was the ultimate high ground, and whoever conquered it first would put all other militaries at a severe disadvantage. So why hasn't it happened yet? That’s what we’ll find out today, in this episode of The Infographics Show- why we can't put weapons on space stations.
SUBSCRIBE TO US -► bit.ly/TheInfographicsShow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEBSITE (SUGGEST A TOPIC):
theinfographicsshow.com
SUPPORT US:
Patreon.......► / theinfographicsshow
SOCIAL:
Twitter........► / theinfoshow
Subreddit...► / theinfographicsshow
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources for this episode:
pastebin.com/JRgAPWTj
@TheInfographicsShow 5 жыл бұрын
What is your preference when it comes to space? Weapons, colonization, cultivation, defense against 👽, something else? Let me know in the comments...
@srikanththallapally1793 5 жыл бұрын
The Infographics Show do alien need oxygen
@sahinyasar9119 5 жыл бұрын
The Infographics Show Should humanity try to evolve using 'CRISPR' to survive in out space? Which way should we evolve?
@hnys7976 5 жыл бұрын
I like space very much. I believe in aliens because we are only one tiny planet when there is billions of planets and galaxies which may be habitable
@dadsonworldwide3238 5 жыл бұрын
Simply launch the weapon opposite the orbit path .
@dadsonworldwide3238 5 жыл бұрын
Reagans star wars defense project with updated tech .
@ASLUHLUHCE 5 жыл бұрын
Saturn's moon Titan has 100 times more oil than Earth? Sounds like Titan needs some freedom.
@0fficerpimp 5 жыл бұрын
Why doesnt this have more likes
@mohamadhafidal-ahyar2253 5 жыл бұрын
Hamzah Patel hmm well you have to tell that fact to UN through US :)
@JamilKhan-hk1wl 5 жыл бұрын
Thanos would be angry
@scott5388 5 жыл бұрын
America: where is my OIL
@josephstalin9357 5 жыл бұрын
Hell yes
@LoganBarrettTriggerHappyGamez 5 жыл бұрын
*"It's over Anakin, I have the high ground"*
@cloroxbleach2615 5 жыл бұрын
"You underestimate my power!"
@silverhawk2718 5 жыл бұрын
Elo Veltix saw this one coming 😂
@angelaakhi7783 5 жыл бұрын
GENERAL KENOBI, YOU ARE A BOLD ONE
@philthethotdestroyer4194 5 жыл бұрын
I immeadiately thought of that when he said high ground
@fruit5003 5 жыл бұрын
Anuke
@MrMogi-zg2ud 5 жыл бұрын
Because the Death Star is too expensive.
@YamahaR12015 5 жыл бұрын
Shoulda said this single line and ended the video💀
@jenniferschmiege8976 5 жыл бұрын
Tie fighters will work
@jecos1966 5 жыл бұрын
yeah 800 Tillion dollars
@Richy076 5 жыл бұрын
"That's no moon"
@kevinsierra482 5 жыл бұрын
Mr. Moji Gaming 15 trillion aint that bad
@chrisdionela 3 жыл бұрын
US Space Force: Allow us to introduce ourselves.
@charleswilson7371 3 жыл бұрын
I can finish..."I am Darth Vader...we have a Death Star above Earth. If you refuse to do as told we Fry you."
@OhFuckItsOlkv 2 жыл бұрын
The USSC is the real Space Force.
@cartersdad615 2 жыл бұрын
@@OhFuckItsOlkv correction WAS (not is) because they haven't been in the lead since the 80s but your correct they were the first outside of the atmosphere.
@OhFuckItsOlkv 2 жыл бұрын
@@cartersdad615 well then, who is in the lead ?
@cartersdad615 2 жыл бұрын
@@OhFuckItsOlkv unfortunately china due to nasa defunding in i believe it was 2011 but not 100% sure if thats the exact year.
@flawless_Cowboy 5 жыл бұрын
America: *Don't try it North Korea! I have the high ground!* North Korea: you underestim- America: *launches orbital nuke
@nothisispatrick4644 5 жыл бұрын
If sci fi movies has thought us about anything... Dont put a space ship sized hole in your giant anti planetary weapon
@zjs4021 5 жыл бұрын
Did you roll for Illiya?
@AR_Animates 5 жыл бұрын
No this is Patrick .I'm not a krusty krab
@nothisispatrick4644 5 жыл бұрын
Yes 320 sq. And I didnt get her
@heresthepork4220 5 жыл бұрын
Stupid emporer palpatine
@nochannel4601 5 жыл бұрын
Hrk StarWars
@barackobama6231 5 жыл бұрын
We dont wanna scare the aliens away now, do we?
@barackobama6231 5 жыл бұрын
@xmr7 pt95 No :/
@JoGyatto 5 жыл бұрын
Barack Obama Can we Buy British Columbia and Baja California
@Biotear 5 жыл бұрын
Barack Obama That depends. Are we talking aliens like Xenomorphs and the Covenant or aliens like E.T and the Asari?
@KangJangkrik 5 жыл бұрын
What if Donald trump isn't agree?
@vortexfury7197 5 жыл бұрын
American misses you sir
@deathlessgamer 5 жыл бұрын
Because after the cold war, everyone in the UN decided that it would be a good idea to only use space for science instead of war.
@roadtonever 5 жыл бұрын
Who cares about the cold war? What about asteroids? Screw you and your liberal media spin.
@augmenseke6131 5 жыл бұрын
Ha. UN.
@deathlessgamer 5 жыл бұрын
@@roadtonever Okay, during the Cold War the Soviets tried to put nuclear weapons into orbit. While that didn't happen, it was thought about, after the Cold War ended or shortly before it ended, I can't really remember, the outer space treaty was signed by all UN member nations. There's no liberal media here, this is all history, look it up. And what about asteroids? That's completely irrelevant to everything.
@roadtonever 5 жыл бұрын
The cold war ended 1991, who cares? Asteroid impact remains a concern. Are you that delusional that you want to dispute these facts?
@IsAcRafT 5 жыл бұрын
@@roadtonever using orbital nukes are NOT the best way to prevent an asteroid impact, it's alot better to deflect then using propulsion from rockets, you have to stop watching movies of science fiction and listen more to real Science. I don't want my part of the planet being screwed by your MURICA F YEAH mindset
@matthewlee8667 5 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in 3000 A.D. Pffft, can you believe we used to fight wars on land?
@darthflash6994 3 жыл бұрын
Sorry dude, we humans are too short term focused to do that.
@JohnDoe-dc7so 5 жыл бұрын
Oh but there are weapons in space: rod of god, direct energy weapons (dew), nuclear, and neutron. (And more that’s still classified)
@ultraman_99 3 жыл бұрын
Paranoia.
@IGNACY-fp8zo 3 жыл бұрын
The sun
@tonysmith2045 3 жыл бұрын
@@ultraman_99 close your eyes insert fingers in ears now follow me lalalalalala Lasers are also on Satellites as technology is catching prophecy as Revelation 13:13 is fulfilled....
@ultraman_99 3 жыл бұрын
@@tonysmith2045 yeah but lasers are not half as strong as they are in movies.
@ultraman_99 3 жыл бұрын
@@tonysmith2045 as a weapon they also are not that practical as weapons
@rogueace9897 5 жыл бұрын
Ok, I just want to point out that gravity wont simply pull an object down that's traveling at orbital speeds, you still need to slow the object down with things like rocket motors or tremendously strong monopropelant engines like the oms on the shuttle... as yes, gravity pulls you down but in orbit you are moving laterally at the same speed as gravity is pulling you down, you need to counteract that force before you can return to earth meaning thermal detection systems would be viable
@massineben7198 5 жыл бұрын
Too sad you can't reply with images. Too much chances to reply with memes to this video were lost :(
@cuzothelegend756 5 жыл бұрын
I know, but if you people could replay with images they would many innappropiate images.
@dontkwo6267 5 жыл бұрын
Ifunny pleb
@weebaverage3026 5 жыл бұрын
6:52 also, that's how COD Ghosts started
@a.feigenheimer8044 5 жыл бұрын
One of the best videos yet. Keep up the good work.
@mario27171 5 жыл бұрын
The Soviet Space Station Salyut 3 (in orbit 1974 - 1975) was equipped with an on-board gun, and they tested it.
@dewaldsteyn1306 3 жыл бұрын
True.
@charleswest6372 Ай бұрын
Yes...evil too
@floppydolphins4123 5 жыл бұрын
Short Answer: Because international treaties ban the use and launch of orbital weapons. (Though... it may be a good idea to put lasers on expensive satellites to shoot down debris that may otherwise collide with them. But you need to make sure it's not abused.)
@christopheremmett7238 5 жыл бұрын
I much prefer this narrator
@liliththeghost613 5 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@XenoflareBahamut 5 жыл бұрын
Dat deep sexy voice
@hihowareyou6122 5 жыл бұрын
He sound like he got diabetes .
@dixienormous9053 5 жыл бұрын
exactly
@savageassassin4741 5 жыл бұрын
Lolololol
@sonybai1087 5 жыл бұрын
i really love this kinda videos.
@TSELVIN 5 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best channels to learn new things.
@Billy-tc2bc 5 жыл бұрын
MY HIGHGROUND NOW BOI
@babyyoda7311 4 жыл бұрын
WIDE BOI
@Crazytrain2015 5 жыл бұрын
Now North Korea will use Space stations as weapons. Thx The Infographics Show.
@NishanthROCK 5 жыл бұрын
Crazytrain2015 ha!
@IsAcRafT 5 жыл бұрын
Just like the military base they have built in the sun ^^
@ofs5554 5 жыл бұрын
they did t build it in the sun they build the base then made the sun around it
@cadagerardo.8794 5 жыл бұрын
No they don't have fund yet
@martyzielinski2469 5 жыл бұрын
Did it at night to keep from burning up.....
@johnwang9914 4 жыл бұрын
Unlike low Earth orbit satellites, when geosynchronous satellites run out of thruster fuel, they do not deorbit, they drift into several stable orbital points and stay in those satellite graveyards forever. I wonder how many of these have a tungsten projectile and a solid fuel thruster in them as a covert orbital kinetic weapon...
@jbmarkowicz4967 5 жыл бұрын
My favourite information channel
@COD1st 5 жыл бұрын
first satellite in space: Russia first animal in space: Russia first man in space: Russia first woman in space: Russia first space walk: Russia first space station: Russia first man on the moon: USA winner of the space race: the USA....
@masonmartineau2304 5 жыл бұрын
Cause the whole point of the Space Race was to see who got to the moon first. The other stuff was irrelevant
@ausore9832 5 жыл бұрын
I believe the Soviets won the space race
@imnobodyanon9430 5 жыл бұрын
Except that if you just wanted to go to space, it'll just take you about a few miles upwards, not more than a trip from my place to some nearby city, the moon, however, is 300,000 kilometers away. And ofc, you don't judge the winner of the race just by who reaches the first checkpoints first, it's who crossed the finish line first, and so far nobody's done it, so there's no winner yet. Ease off commie.
@tententononce2570 5 жыл бұрын
we dont even know if first walk on moon was real
@Mikebrowski 5 жыл бұрын
the space race was more about the influence and whos left standing...at least in my opnion I bellive that would be US since Soviet Union is disolved. Otherwise the soviet won when it comes to whos in space
@warhammernerd52Daxx-Lorenzo898 5 жыл бұрын
Command and Conquer's Ion Cannon
@wolfleader2 5 жыл бұрын
warhammernerd52 omg lol i loved that game
@felixtemann1477 5 жыл бұрын
Pixel gun, orbital striking cannon.
@henrichkaminski9674 5 жыл бұрын
i just say Temple of Nod or Rift Generator
@prajwalbasnet4461 5 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation💓💓
@AlexTrusk91 5 жыл бұрын
0:55 nice reference with the rocket in the background
@probably_seohyun 5 жыл бұрын
The weapon in space in G.I. Joe which is the Tungsten Rod Weapon is effective, and logically not banned in the treaty, therefore any nation could counter it and start building that said weapon. Also I feel like I already watch this days ago, weird.
@IsAcRafT 5 жыл бұрын
Unless the treaty becomes updated, seriously the only reason the humanity should put weapons in the space would be to deflect asteroids not for pathetic disputes over lands or other meaningless BS
@probably_seohyun 5 жыл бұрын
@@IsAcRafT Competition. To show who's powerful than others, why won't we just act like one country, I think it's better that way.
@Namkify 5 жыл бұрын
Ennush Sandoval so you are calling for more World Wars?
@probably_seohyun 5 жыл бұрын
@@Namkify No I'm not.
@Namkify 5 жыл бұрын
@@probably_seohyun But by the way things are It seems as the only real scenario where the nations would forfeit their souveragnty(*?) to one single entity.
@TheAviationistKhizr 5 жыл бұрын
why can't the world just live in peace and work to help humanity, thankfully the Earth has stopped war from reaching space but i hope that space doesn't get weaponized and should be for exploration and adventure! I still love star wars tho, its in a galaxy far far away. :)
@soldier50first 5 жыл бұрын
The Aviationist Khizr there’s simply no such thing as peace all things in the universe hold energy and are bringers of chaos
@TheAviationistKhizr 5 жыл бұрын
@@soldier50first I can accept that humanity will bring war to space, I know it will, it's inevitable. The universe full is energy but it's more beautiful kind, not the brutal violence of war with suffering and corruption.
@soldier50first 5 жыл бұрын
The Aviationist Khizr idk stuff hurling around in space and crashing into planets or stars expanding and consuming everything... I’d say the universe is more brutal then any lifeform and much more unforgiving, but that’s what I find so beautiful about it and life itself so what ever.
@TheAviationistKhizr 5 жыл бұрын
well, you have a point :)
@soldier50first 5 жыл бұрын
The Aviationist Khizr then again I love reading about war and people suffering so idk Imao
@photelegy 5 жыл бұрын
I really thought you'd talk about lasers and the possibility to use satellite who can accelerate a solar powered shuttle, also can be used as a weapon.
@declanbeardsley8413 5 жыл бұрын
Love your vids
@GrapeDaily 5 жыл бұрын
I upload *Sweet, Plump* Grapes everyday until, well I don’t really know how long! But for a really long time! *789 other people agree with this!* *-P.S. don’t reply to this comment I hate notifications-*
@yeetthatmeat3235 5 жыл бұрын
Grape Daily k stop promoting ur self
@edwin6284 5 жыл бұрын
Comment
@Welsh7133 5 жыл бұрын
Boink
@tlastknight 5 жыл бұрын
*749 other people agree with this!*
@GrapeDaily 5 жыл бұрын
Oh no
@InfiniteMindz 5 жыл бұрын
My high ground now
@y33t23 5 жыл бұрын
Easy solution for the reaction thing: Put the rocket on top of the space station (like a Spaceshuttle sits on its big fuel tank), disconnect the rocket from the station and fire the rockets engine. There won't be a force pushing again the space station.
@darthcreaper8173 5 жыл бұрын
May the Force be with y'all.
@rahulbl3h806 5 жыл бұрын
Thanos chose the best weapon
@jud1114 5 жыл бұрын
what about we just put the weapon on the moon and make a base in it?, like on independence day 2
@lachlan_bear2243 5 жыл бұрын
I was waiting for you to mention kinetic bombardments
@jacobbrown2683 5 жыл бұрын
I can’t seem to find the Obi-Wan reference to the high ground. The archives must be incomplete!
@lukamtc9188 5 жыл бұрын
**General Kenobi is triggered**
@foughtstatue1023 5 жыл бұрын
“Soviet Union” *Highlights Russia* Oh yes I also know that they are almost the same thing but they forgot Belarus, Ukraine, etc.
@flomietv5960 4 жыл бұрын
You know, or you could just significantly lower the mass of the projectile being shot. (Hence why blasters shoot plasma/light beams ect) little to no weight, but lots of energy.
@toxicwolf3038 5 жыл бұрын
ohhh cool we can put an wix weapon at space .. i got it alright , thanks for the info
@jmmldave5543 5 жыл бұрын
so countries that arent part of UN can make space rockets assuming they have the resources?
@GaviRG1 5 жыл бұрын
Every country even north korea is part of the UN....
@jmmldave5543 5 жыл бұрын
There are observer countries though that are technically non-members.
@canary6215 5 жыл бұрын
They can make it, but it will get destroyed by those who did sign it.
@Mrscumbucket 5 жыл бұрын
Orbital cannon Only gta V players will know
@NishanthROCK 5 жыл бұрын
Mr. scumbucket ...
@Mrscumbucket 5 жыл бұрын
Nishanth ROCK am I right or am I right ?
@NishanthROCK 5 жыл бұрын
Mr. scumbucket u confusing me boi
@user-lone 5 жыл бұрын
You are right lad
@Jakedasake 5 жыл бұрын
What about the Ion Cannon...? Only Command and Conquer players will know.
@quellem7 5 жыл бұрын
“Space force” is upon us!!
@Obsidian369 4 жыл бұрын
what music is playing in the backround please?
@yourbiggestfan2593 5 жыл бұрын
What about super powerful lasers
@jacksontan9117 5 жыл бұрын
Nope due to diffraction the laser would be too weak
@XenoflareBahamut 5 жыл бұрын
How about using multiple mirrors and make them focus on a single point to burn something
@TriplekilzTk1 5 жыл бұрын
Exaflare Bahamut That... is what a laser is.
@XenoflareBahamut 5 жыл бұрын
@@TriplekilzTk1 Oh....... well at least I learned something new
@theawakeningofjohnnynewsom9072 5 жыл бұрын
Exaflare Bahamut THEY PROTECC THEY ATTACC BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY EMPIRE STRIKES BACC
@yatharthpandey7056 5 жыл бұрын
To avoid Star Wars
@Richy076 5 жыл бұрын
It's "I have the high ground"
@silencia08 5 жыл бұрын
0:09 Obi-Wan Kenobi: I Have the High Ground!
@DiamondBackProject 5 жыл бұрын
I love it how other youtubers blast they’re sponsors so blatantly but I adore how the infogrsphics show always crowbars the sponsor right at the end Thanks for not ejaculating it in our face throughout the video but saving it for 5 seconds at the end credits
@deaundrejohnson487 5 жыл бұрын
Because Russia and China are already trying to
@hendrayudhapratama1027 5 жыл бұрын
dont forget USA, "rods of god".
@bprogressive 5 жыл бұрын
imagination of conservative mindsets
@deaundrejohnson487 5 жыл бұрын
@@bprogressive you don't think Russia and China are trying to put weapons in space?
@bprogressive 5 жыл бұрын
@@deaundrejohnson487 yes they could.. but usa clear the way...
@deaundrejohnson487 5 жыл бұрын
@@bprogressive what? There's no could they are and if we don't do it first it won't matter how much we spend on our defense
@internetexplorer2498 5 жыл бұрын
Why don't we end war?
@nosteponsnek2846 5 жыл бұрын
Were it so easy.
@Richy076 5 жыл бұрын
Because America keeps finding oil
@user-mw1cm1kl3s 5 жыл бұрын
Pacifists always become subjugated by force. A world of no conflict lives in your dream only.
@ethan2guns 5 жыл бұрын
The rate at which you can push these out is astounding.
@glittersoop 5 жыл бұрын
your segues are amazing
@djwakademikz 5 жыл бұрын
Don't give Russia ideas!
@masonm1124 5 жыл бұрын
Doge They actually got rid of Russia’s ideas. They used, cons, not pros.
@thedodob1rd 5 жыл бұрын
The Soviets did it with potato technology. We should be able to do it no problem.
@thedodob1rd 5 жыл бұрын
@Hasoni Mustafa too bad we dont have the technology for that yet. We are still stuck on coke and mentos.
@pantiespending 4 жыл бұрын
This is dope
@ltkcrimson8135 5 жыл бұрын
Me:It's over Drift , I have the highground
@alexanderrad3458 5 жыл бұрын
You forget that as a deterrent , it’s cheaper to have subs that can’t be tracked. MAD means mutually assured destruction, thus space weapons wouldn’t prevent retaliation from icbm subs.
@Gryflir 5 жыл бұрын
6:05 little confusion there. "because F=ma, by etc..." You meant "because E=mv²/2" (for kinetic). The gravity isn't gonna accelerate more that it does already when it is in orbit (you just fall and miss the Earth).
@allofthiswasanexperimentlo9641 5 жыл бұрын
this comment is the ultimate weapon. science is a no no for me and my brain just exploded harder than all the nukes in the world combined...
@Gryflir 5 жыл бұрын
LOL
@sparrow69420 5 жыл бұрын
Ur great from does you ger these ideas Nice video well done men😙
@databanks 5 жыл бұрын
You forgot plain old kinetic weapons. Dropping a mass from orbit that's capable of getting through without burning up would have a LOT of kinetic energy. Some calculations rate them on the scale of a megaton nuke, just from sheer momentum. I've even heard them described of "The Hammer of God" edit: Never mind, you got there towards the end
@jasonsweeney890 5 жыл бұрын
i remember that scene in that one movie i forgotten the name of where the many countries are like "how do we shoot down this thing, well need some sort of space laser... does anyone have one?" and everyone but canada raises their hand. i forgot how exactly it went but i remember a scene like that. i think it was dr strangelove.
@alexbuss3377 5 жыл бұрын
We can’t put radar absorbent material on vehicles, weapons, that are coming towards earth, the said material would burn off, the f-22’s radar absorbing material has a temperature limit of around Mach 3, the faster it goes the more air it hits, which means friction, and if they go past a certain speed Mach 3-4(estimates). So if someone where to put radar absorbing materials on a weapon going from space to earth, the heat signature would point it out, also the radar material would burn up upon re-entry. As re-entry speeds are around Mach 25
@cykalandon8635 5 жыл бұрын
A surprise to be sure but a welcome one
@Batmanderp38 4 жыл бұрын
What about the weapon station that launches rods made out of some materiel that has a pointed end or just a rod basically like the one from call of duty ghost and its non nuclear
@liliththeghost613 5 жыл бұрын
Mind blown 😱
@i0nlz 4 жыл бұрын
Whenever I hear about weapons in space I remember the -deathstar- orbital cannon
@stampybird742 5 жыл бұрын
1:19. You could ignore the Newton’s 3rd law if you have ICBM type weapons with their own propulsion. Because they would propel themselves, they would only need a small push to clear the mothership.
@razgrizadler 5 жыл бұрын
nice bgm
@jamesdean0885 4 жыл бұрын
Kinetic weapons would work lovely, built from Tungston they wouldn't melt and the speed would create a explosion equlivant to that of a sub orbital nuke.
@jamesdean0885 4 жыл бұрын
Ok, so I clearly typed this comment early on in the video. My bad.
@Manu-qf8bs 5 жыл бұрын
06:20, does it imply Meteoren-Blitzkrieg? :o
@nguyentnhoang 4 жыл бұрын
What is the background song of this video?
@carrotylemons1190 4 жыл бұрын
At 3:35 it says you could just release the missile orient it and have it pulled down to earth by gravity, but it would still have all the velocity of the space station; therefore needing a rocket engine.
@nickc.4381 5 жыл бұрын
It might also be possible to make something like the satellites that Cobra used in the live-action G.I. Joe mobie...
@josephisrael8959 5 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on bio weapons
@martinx3450 4 жыл бұрын
This one was prepared BADLY. 1) Wepons on orbit. a) automatic canon was actually used on one soviet station. When not too big, not to heavy ammunition and when made as recoilless as possible (say centrifugal force powered gun), you can freely use it as point defence of sorts, with mitigated cons you mentioned. b) not only nukes, but also kinetic rods and lasers can be used quite easily. Not to mention unmanned space vehicles, like the boeing X-37, wich can be used for attacks on enemy space structures (like satelites, sensors, etc). 2) correction engines. There are such types of engines, wich does require either small(er) amount of fuel, or energy only to work. One of such devices are the movement correcting gyroscopes on spacestation Alpha on our orbit right now.
@glorytoarstotzka330 5 жыл бұрын
i wish these episodes would have 2 parts , 1. at the start saying a straightforward answer | 2. long answer which contains explaining [without these 2 elements, every video is 50% clickbait]
@florianaseifert 5 жыл бұрын
0:10 It's over Anakin! I have the highground!
@Ronbonbon7 4 жыл бұрын
The same kinds of weapons outlined in COD: Ghosts and GI Joe Retaliation.
@putins_hemmy8974 5 жыл бұрын
I suggest you look up the weapon Rods From God. It's a weapon that shoots a huge rod and has a blast radius of a nuclear bomb. It's actually very fascinating.
@nerfmaniac6760 4 жыл бұрын
There was a gun on most USSR missions to protect the crew once they landed, and one time they did bring a machine gun up. This could be wrong but I’m pretty sure it is true, this is just from memory
@IamLegendaryguy1998 5 жыл бұрын
Space greatness
@Barri2410 5 жыл бұрын
5:51 SOLG, ODIN, Project Zeus... Anymore?
@mihir1700 5 жыл бұрын
Because of the space treaty
@priyojitsarkar3638 5 жыл бұрын
*best channel for knowledge*
@nathnathn 5 жыл бұрын
Technically there have been acknowledged weapons in space in the cold war era one of the space stations the soviets put up had a mini-gun installed to repel potential boarders. i cant remember the exact gun they used.
@Sebanoe 5 жыл бұрын
The problem with the spaceship firing rockets can easily be counteracted, all you have to do is simply release the rocket from the space craft with minor force like air jets and when the missile is clear of the space craft it will propel itself to its target.
@massv953 5 жыл бұрын
What about a laser or energy based weapon? it would not produce the counter forces and can have very great range in a vacuum
@itzdaman 5 жыл бұрын
3:34 no, that's not how orbits work. You need thrust to reduce orbital speeds for re-entry, and the faster you want to de-orbit, the stronger the thrust has to be.
@pravanshwalia3225 5 жыл бұрын
Space: *has highground Obi Wan Kenobi:😏😏
@timur5241 4 жыл бұрын
Weapons in space Most people: space strike Me: guns for shooting in space
@rock-uu7qr 5 жыл бұрын
Yes
@dr.snowman4883 5 жыл бұрын
Russia: "it's over America, I have the high ground!" America: "you underestimate my power."
@gabewilliamson6230 5 жыл бұрын
The impacted is like the rods from call of duty ghosts
@joshuaghozeil8061 5 жыл бұрын
I hate to be that guy, but there is a weapons design that applies the theory at [1:40] called kenetic bombardment it was calculated to produce the power of a nucular bomb without the fallout, and harded to intercpt as its traveling at mach 6. All with a single tongston rod shapped like a missile no warhead required.
@gauravmunde9537 2 жыл бұрын
Good
@larrywoodward3982 4 жыл бұрын
A huge rod of a metal I can't remember the name of from space would be big a nukelier or however you spell it would be a nightmare but a tarsa bamba from space will be overkill
Neil deGrasse Tyson: modern hydrogen nuclear weapons don’t have the radiation fallout problem of WW2
Interstellar1977
Рет қаралды 41 М.
Why Space Weapons Are USELESS Relative To Earth's Surface Neil DeGrasse Tyson #shorts #joerogan #jre
Universe University
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
The Infographics Show
Рет қаралды 681 М.