And 1.75 metres is 5'9", not 5'8". Could you clarify that? Are we seeing again the usual attention to detail that goes into forensic "science"? If I had to bet I'd bet on its being an unretouched photo, but this doesn't increase my confidence.

A much more important question is how is a photo of a similar rifle enough evidence to convict.....could another not be produced alike 🤔 . This would not work these days to prosecute indicates a corrupt justice system. Lastly I appreciate the documentaries but it is as if you are tip toeing to now tell anything critical....but just explain why we should believe our government and the system around us Would love to see a documentary on how jfk's first move was going to be to investigate 🔎 and possibly shut down the Cia? And then shot dead ?????

Hmmm, sounds like some kind of conspiracy...

First you say 70. Then you say 65. Just what are you covering up, Vox? (satire)

This is how conspiracies are fed...

He did

@@ahmedwaseem8097 Amazing

That's what I want to know too

Was thinking the same thing.

I guess Vox commented that he got to keep it.

bernadette banner has an interesting video about old photo editing, although that's more about really old photos

Vox did a video on that 2 years ago, look up "Vox Soviet doctored photo"

@@_Zaid thank you for saying that, i thought i wss the only one who remembered that!

⭕SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE VOX

That would be cool, but the conspiracy theorists would cry and moan over Soviet technology versus US tech of the era.

Marina Oswald said she took the photo

He probably took the picture because guns are cool and he likely didn't intend to perform an assassination when it was taken

1. His wife took'em. 2. Southerners have a thing for guns. 3. It's coincidential, he just wanted to be photographed with his reading material.

@@missdeejay Yeah, because it's so entirely usual for someone to want to be photographed with their gun in one hand and their reading material in the other.

@@debarshidas8072 it is usual for people to be photographed with their guns, especially in Texas. I'm not saying there wasn't a cover-up, but I think this picture is a diversion. There's real evidence out there that says Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy with a rifle, and it's the paraffin and nitrate test results, that came out on Nov 23. They were negative for firing a rifle. More than if a picture was doctored or not, the important fact is that Lee didn't shoot Kennedy, and there's a negative nitrate test that proves it.

Almost like someone was showing it too him. Was like hey go ahead it looks good in your hands. Hold it I'll take a picture for you

​@@UnPhAzD91And Oswald allegedly exclaimed that the photo was altered when it was shown to him by police. He had worked on high end, high resolution photography.

Right on. It was absolutely real. And taken for a reason and purpose

as if it's a set for a movie

Probably a home office.

That's a classroom..

nah, I had him as a teacher. Dude is actually just organized

how do we know he's not a 3D recreation of a professor at UCB who's an expert in forensics

I must know this too PLEASE TELL ME

My guess is no since there was an edit right afterward.

I mean ge bent it up. It must be his lol

@@TaylorIserman but maybe he put it in his bag or something during the cut

An even greater mystery

No cover up bro Oswald he was that good fr do you think the u.s Gov or any one military back then would be involved time proves there is no cover up why hasn't trump or Biden or Nixon been assassinated there was no point the u.s gov or cia risking this fr dude think bout it my father he would pull people up like that Oswald did it a top shooter can do that just like Bruce Lee was a freak of nature so was Oswald

Bingo

Oswald still doing what he was originally tasked to do - create doubt and confusion. Everyone knows the CIA organized and carried out the assassination of both Kennedy's. No doubt the cozy relationship between the CIA and Mafia suggest there were others involved.

Look at the sling swivels. The alleged rifle has them on the left side. The rifle in these photos has them on the bottom of the stock. Can't be the same rifle.

I genuinely cannot tell if you and everyone else replying are memeing or not.

I thought about your point, but then I remember all the people caught for their crimes after posting about it on social media.

I believe he took it to try and look cool and all like "yeah I'm about to make a change". Kinda edgy.

There's no reason to assume he's an intelligent person.

If i have a gun and pose with it, do I suddenly have superior motives? Stop trying to look into things.

Well he lived in the south and you know how much they love their guns. It's not the first photo to ever been taken with a guna and that's not unusual at all.

Yeah that's what I've been thinking the whole video. At the moment the photo was taken, there's for sure another witness besides Oswald -- the one who took the picture.

@@DapayTobias it was the first selfie LOL

@@achillestheant430 nope

His wife was coerced into implicating her husband.

@@danielyoungblood8525 it was a joke.

Lordy help us

We will never know!

"What is the threat to national security?"😂😂😂😂😂😂 It's themselves!!!!!!

_" What is the threat to national security?"_ The threat to national security is the person that actual shot JFK.

THE GOVERNMENT WAS IN ON IT, THAT'S WHY THEY CANNOT RELEASE MORE DOCUMENTS

Something like 95% of all files related to the Kennedy assassination have already been released.

If a government or individuals are going to murder a president, there would be no paper trail.

Well they were just curious about it if Lee H. Oswald was actually the person who murderered JFK and they did it for education so that people can know what happened to JFK unless they're not interested in it.

It's not a "random" snapshot

@@walter-st3fb But I think he didn’t expect it to go this viral. It may not be random but you get my point

What

@@elongatedalbatross9318 what „what“

That doesn't answer the question. Something is important as the rifle and they retouched it? There is something fishy about that

@@maniswolftoman yeah it's a little different airbrushing and model cellulite is just for Aesthetics. altering a photograph of a weapon that possibly murdered a president is interference and Criminal. I'm going to say it's not the same, but you go ahead and believing you right.

It fundamentally changes the photos in a way that serves no legitimate purpose

@@maniswolftoman because they're framing Lee Harvey Oswald

@@maniswolftoman pretty ignorant question! This is NOT just another photo, but what was being brought out as EVIDENCE of Oswalds´s guilt. You don´t "retouch" evidence" even if it is for some magazine. BTW - did Life include any reference to their "retouching" in the text or did they only ADMIT it after it was noticed by numerous people? Wanna bet what the answer is???

Nobody can stand like that

same... was golden.

That’s how he got payed .

I'm not the only one who made a mental note like that. Like, exactly what I was thinking, how do you say no to that? hahah

It's one of those um... yeah of course, mments

Yeah

The excitement was genuine

Also why would Oswald buy a rifle from a mail order company which would involve giving a name and address as well as providing his handwriting as evidence, when he could have just walked into any gun shop and purchased a rifle with a cash payment without giving any personal details leaving only the memory of the shop assistant to provide a description of him.

Oh yeahh, that’s definitely a great way of stacking up views i love these types of stuff

" Hany Farid is an American university professor who specializes in the analysis of digital images, Dean and Head of School for the UC Berkeley School of Information. In addition to teaching, writing, and conducting research, Farid acts as a consultant for non-profits, government agencies, and news organizations. Wikipedia " Does that sound like a person who has time to make KZfaq videos for us?

@@macforme maybe he should do vlogs for his every day life. I'd watch that

Agreed

Just to be clear... that means Oswald's face was taken from 1single photo, and that same 1 face was used in 3 different photos. Without question. And you don't need fancy equipment to see or prove it. A real expert would know it.

I've read six memes and three book jackets about photo retouching, so I know my stuff!

@@brianarbenz7206 You should be doing talk shows, such an expert! Don't get anything less than 10,000/show.

Hany Farid : Oh you can't do this to me.

What's so powerful about this video, is how they start it off by making the conspiracy seem plausible, likely even, showing all the arguments for the case. Then, they debunk all of it. For someone who's lost in the conspiracy, it's gonna be really hard to refute anything when they have presented all the evidence they would likely bring up, to begin with.

@@hejalll Go out and try it in the real sun and not on a computer and see what results you get...

Get a girlfriend that understands you.

😆😂

I know that excitement, as I collect vintage magazines, etc., on Marilyn Monroe...so I can relate with obtaining sought after items!😊

The way he reacted when he said wow the “original“ I thought he had the actual original photograph. It was only the magazine.

It comes out of an interest in history, and wanting to see the stuff first-hand, the real originals. I feel a similar thrill watching uncut tv news footage from the hours just after the assassination, how the news items and rumours spread through the media, and how it snowballs from the first reports to the final, dire moment when Cronkite declares: "this just came in and it looks official: President Kennedy died around 1 p.m today at Parkland....".

Right

Yet even 60 years later,criminals still brag about the crimes they just committed,and post these online😳

How do you know Oswald's rifle was really the murder weapon.? Because the Dallas PD and the FBI said so? The magic bullet was conveniently found on a stretcher after going through two people.

Don't let national Inquirer get pics of your murder shoes either -o.j.

@@gortbot7748 2 people after changing direction mid air and creating like 7 different wounds.

Not just 3D artists....

Facts

Baloney.

Bro just stop, stop wasting time

Hi verified, buying a channel huh? Edit: That was like a month ago where it was difficult to identify between verified and bought channels

@@bumblebeegamerreal after looking through the channel they seem to upload pretty regularly

@@bumblebeegamerrealit’s probably just him posting a comment

It looks like it?

The government can’t fill pot holes how can the kelp this massive thing a secret?

*Ah, yes. The floor is made of floor.*

Except when it has been chem trailed :)

People STILL believe that Biden has won! ;-) [incredulous sarcasm]

Conspiracy theories are referred to as being "self sealing." The harder you try to disprove a thing, the more suspicious you appear, and this perceived intent is seen as proof of the conspiracy. You can't prove a negative, and these theories put the responsibility on the critic to disprove a thing. It's impossible to disprove that Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, and the harder you try, the more fuel you give the fire.

Another words if you touch water won’t be dry.

Wow that is definitely interesting! I know what hole I'm going down next 😆

@@bubblingbubztheklown5902 it’s fascinating stuff

@@bubblingbubztheklown5902 Vox did a video on it a few years ago. Soviet Photo Doctering or something

Not only that but a military or intelligence entity- as theorized- would definitely have more advanced equipments and resources that wouldn't be available for the public for at least 10y. We see that all the time

Exactly. People who think photo editing wasn’t possible the earlier part of the century are fools. There was clearly an ability there already.

if something looks obviously screwy does that mean it is genuine. ? We've all seen thousands of photos of everything under the sun and never think" Gee that looks phony".

And yet the photo is real; so all that shadow and "back and to the left" stuff evaporates into nothing. Just like Kennedy's "back and to the left" muscle spasm; there is real-life evidence that he was hit from behind - only - so who cares about a muscle spasm?

It could also easily be camera angles

it's the angle or light. my chin looks different too on photos

And the fact that A mob boss being tapped for another crime talked about his outfits hand in killing Kennedy.

Also ties with the mafia

No, it doesn't. No, he wasn't.

@@ejtattersall156 yes he was

@@paulmcgarrigle5531 Nope. No link, it didn't happen. "On March 11, 1959, Ruby was approached by FBI agent Charles W. Flynn, of the Dallas Office, to become a federal informant ...Ruby was ... subsequently contacted by the FBI eight times between March 11, 1959, and October 2, 1959, but provided no information to the Bureau, was not paid, and contact ceased." Conspiracy religion is full of liars.

Right you are. The FBI planted the Oswald print. Authorities have no verified evidence linking Oswald to the gun found in the school book depository.

yes, the funeral home director remembers washing the fingerprinting ink off Oz's hands

So there is no cow there in Texas...too bad for the texans...

LoL.

No proof either way on if he worked alone. It's best to stick to the verifiable facts.

@@bwood1234qwert 😆😆😆

@@bwood1234qwert Which show obvious conspiracy in every crucial area.

Oswald was most likely set up and the backyard photo was most likely Roscoe White.

@@swankybutters8371 Roscoe White, yes. Friend of Oswalds in the Marines, hired by Dallas PD as a photo expert. White's wife and Oswald's wife lived together.

@@nmarbletoe8210 I didn't know White's wife and Marina knew each other, I heard nothing about that, hummm. I'm also pretty sure that Roscoe was the knoll shooter, 70% to 80% sure... Same with the guy in the Records Building, I'm pretty sure he was the Oswald stand-in, in Mexico... 70% to 80% sure.

@@swankybutters8371 Oh I think I got Mrs. White confused with Mrs. Paine.

@@nmarbletoe8210 I have a feeling Roscoe knew Mrs Paine and most likely got her to get Oswald the job at the Book Depository... Paine might have even taken the back yard photos, maybe...

Oswald X)

oswald said he didn't do it,,,i believe him

@@silence-humility-calmness You do now that criminals lie right?

@@generalfred9426 but governments don't?

@@silence-humility-calmness Well whenever they try they get busted one way or another (looks at Watergate and Clinton affair)

Facts, it's a shame that I was this early.

There are?

One can say being first, may be a blessing and a curse 😉

@@asr4327 let me guess, that’s you

deep

Especially considering dozen of photographic experts have concluded the photos are genuine.. And Oswald gave an autographed copy to a friend.. AND Marina, to this very day, will tell you she took those photos.. lol, smh.. The loons went ‘round the bend long ago..

JamesBu11 Nice Sherlock Homes quote.

Yup. Not impossible. So he did it.

@@underwaterlaser1687 haha my bad I thought it was 1984

JFK to 9/11: Everything Is a Rich Man's Trick (Documentary /watch?v=9Wf3O93I4lI) September 11: The New Pearl Harbor (Documentary /watch?v=Rq9nUPs2RAk)

You underestimate your talents 😏

there were a few different peoples --not only Oswald---and they shoot target from different distances

@@nightmare-lw9sp i totally agree with you I couldnt get those shots off even though I trained and trained and trained more on bolt action rifles on static targets yet alone moving ones.

skill issue real talk

He was an expert marksman, and he had a near perfect vantage point. Maybe you couldn't have, but that doesn't mean he couldn't have.

@Pol Pot 2024 lots of practice studying and drawing light and shadow perhaps? Just something that seems vaguely related

Nah i am a kindergardener and i also find that image to be genuine. In my field of work, i am often faced with many people striking odd poses out on the field while carrying objects too heavy for their sizes. Once people believe what they imagine, they will proclaim them as facts.

@@Gquain a w h a t

Oh look im pretending to be an artist to make you think that my opinion counts more, while i try to confirm the official narrative.

Wow the actual conspiracy theorists have found this video!

That’s the point

All of the rest of the evidence does!

“The many faces of Oswald”is much better then this video

@@mikenorton632 really

One thing I'll never understand is this how did Oswald get from the second floor lunch room to the sixth floor do his deed and get back down again without being seen bear in mind the building would have been buzzing with people going to and grow with the president arriving and no one seen Oswald I find that hard to believe.

This is one of the biggest deceptions from the conspiracy people. They never quote Oswald's full statement, which was "They’ve taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union. I’m just a patsy."

🔴SERCH ADITYA RATHORE-HE ALSO MAKES INFORMATIVE CONTENT LIKE VOX

It avoided a nuclear holocaust... according to Red Dwarf episode, late 80's Twilight Zone, Stephen King book.

@@laartwork Why are you afraid of death

They killed a president of the United States!🤺

@JayNJayeTv: They did. She said she did take a photo of LHO with his weapons but not that photo.....she said the one she took showed LHO standing in another part of the yard.

Just ONE rifle was found. It was misidentified.

Yes the government had jfk killed how had the most to gain from JFK's death Johnson and big business all the weapon and war material from a 10 long war they didn't want to win Johnson wife own a construction company that did a whole lot of work in Vietnam

And the select committee.

@@banjohombre7252 So they say

“there were 2 rifles found on the 6th floor.” Wrong. Only one rifle was found. You have no evidence for another one. “an employee working at the time said she was standing near the bottom of the stairs that lead to the 6th floor of the school book depository and said Oswald never went up or came down the stairs anytime before or after the assassination.” Victoria Adams was mistaken in her estimate of the time and must have used the back staircase a few minutes after Oswald’s descent (as well as Truly and Baker’s ascension), based on the fact that she saw Depository foreman William Shelley and employee Billy Lovelady as soon as she reached the first floor. Both men told authorities in 1964 that they were outside the Depository at the time of the shots, ran to the railroad yards immediately thereafter, and didn’t reenter the building until a few minutes later. Adams testified she left the building by the rear loading dock (after encountering Shelley and Lovelady), made her way around to the front of the building, and heard a report (later proved incorrect) over a nearby police radio that shots were thought to have been fired from the second or fourth floor of the Depository (6 H 391). The two earliest such reports were made over channel 2, one at 12:39 and the other at 12:40 p.m.-nine to ten minutes after the shooting (NAS-CBA DPD tapes, C2, 12:39-40 p.m.)-which is not only consistent with the statements of Shelley and Lovelady, but also strongly suggestive, all by itself, that Adams didn’t come down the back stairs immediately after the shooting, as she claimed. Eddie Piper told the Commission that he was standing near the back elevators when Truly and Baker ran over, unsuccessfully tried to call one of the elevators down, and dashed up the stairs. Piper stated that “nobody” came down the stairs before Truly and Baker went up, which Adams and Styles would have done if they had come down the stairs immediately. When Piper was specifically asked, “Did you see Vicky Adams come down the steps . . . before Truly and the man [Baker] went up the steps?” he responded, “No, sir, no, sir. She didn’t do it”

Ok, how do those figures change when we go ask Marina if she took the photos, and she answers yes?!.. Like she has always maintained?.. lol..

Good catch! Thanks, we added a correction.

@@jacobjones5269 you accept it as fact, because she said it ?

@@xrizbira I accept it because literally dozens of forensic photographic experts say they’re genuine.. And I believe Marina for a few reasons.. One, she’s never wavered from that statement, and she’ll tell you today, if you ask her, that she took the pics… Even though she’s a conspiracy believer.. And secondly, if they are genuine, which they are, then who is the most likely person to have taken the pics?..

@@jacobjones5269 now tell me why he killed JFK ? This is like the umbrella man, he just protesting why he had a black umbrella. A protest that he is the only one who understand it, but accepted as valid and fact. Too many coincid3nce for it not to be a conspiracy

Yes

…Kennedys

@@TheTwick yes

@@TheTwick his brother was going to run for president but was also shot

@@abrahamlincoln8037 typical Kennedy’s graciousness

Interesting piece! I think the last point the guy makes is particularly important - how on earth could any entity alter photos so perfectly using early 60's optical techniques, to the point that they would stand up to scrutiny from technology that wouldn't even be invented for decades?

Either way it’s evidence of nothing from dealy plaza

Your question is so easy to google.

Hahahhaaaaaa! Yeh he explained everything too thoroughly... hmmm... must be on on it. (I can't say I didn't have this thought 😬)

@@bubblingbubztheklown5902 haha. Yep. “Plausible, huh? A little _too_ plausible.”

@@Yellowsnow69420 that's exactly what I said to my husband!

Shut up and stop posting this eveywhwre

Why is someone's murder funny?

Ever see the movie JFK? It overemphasized parts of the case, and that’s a famous line from it. Became so popular it was even parodied in a Seinfeld episode

Lol 😂

@@longfield0023 If you've never seen Seinfeld, just say you missed out on a cultural touchstone and go away.

I know, when taking a random photo I often get my lights out during the day to better light a photo.

Same, I wasn’t even aware of it. To throw more gas on this fire, it’s interesting that only the flimsiest aspects of the conspiracy are mentioned and hyper-analyzed in popular media. Me and the House Select Committee on Assassinations who concluded that JFK’s death was probably the result of a conspiracy are just weirdos I guess.

@@jonathandelossantos9332 The House Committee's evidence of "conspiracy" were based on audio recordings taken by Dallas Policeman that didn't synchronize properly. Those findings were refuted with the House Committee not finding any evidence that any group was part of conspiracy which meant that Oswald acted alone.

That's the point. They produce a large amount of very small details that don't match up to corroborate their hypothesis and it takes time and effort to debunk each one. At which point they jump to the next one and say "despite that being false, the rest checks out!"

@@jonathandelossantos9332 Not really, you're not. The weird ones are those who believe what the WC report says. Your conclusions are right.

@@generalfred9426 He did not because he couldn't. Go back and see what JFK did. His actions made some people angry.

Lyndon, he got to become president, Texas is his place and the Mafia helped

Ah yes, dear sirs, I have thoroughly investigated all the accusations against me, and in doing so I found no wrongdoing on my behalf. Believe me ...I really tried to find it but sadly I did not. It seems it was a simple misunderstanding ... a witch hunt if you will.

Technically the Warren commission was entirely separate, however that doesn't prevent agencies from interfering still

@@idek6585 Exactly. And agencies like the FBI & CIA withhold information & evidence which is a form obstruction

@@idek6585 Appointed by one of the conspirators, the commission was not independent.

Never ,ever shod it be investigated by the same agencies. Reminds me of too much about the FBI And President Biden's associations with the LEFT WING and the FBI. ooooh Too Creepy.

Mirror image of the 1st rifle photo? It would switch hands and sides for the rifle.

1. You can't see the wedding ring because the image is grainy, doesn't mean it's not there. 2. The other hand has his Marine ring on it.

possibly michael paine, although i think it was actually Oswald's head on someone else's body, maybe roscoe white fairly good chance paine was the Oswald who shot Tippit

thats awesome. i love original cool stuff like that

I hear that Life was going to run a story that month on corruption of LBJ, but the other events obviously took precedence.

nice

@@nmarbletoe8210 Correct.

you got it

I'm fully on board on something very fishy happening with the JFK murder, including the possibility that Oswald didn't shoot him at all. It does seem like the picture is real but that is hardly evidence of him killing the president. It doesn't change my views on the JFK murder being something different than what we were told.

Nobody can put the rifle in Oswald’s hands while it’s being fired, so I don’t think anyone who believes in a conspiracy can ever be convinced it wasn’t.. However, there’s no doubt Lee was a cop killer.. Theres witnesses and evidence strewn across 6 city blocks.. The most damaging being the jacket the alleged killer discarded under a car 3 blocks from the murder scene.. And the reason is, nobody can reasonably claim the jacket was planted, because nobody knew a cop would be murdered right there and right then.. And they certainly wouldn’t know an escape route that didn’t exist until the killer stopped shooting.. And consequently, conspiracy believers have no answer for why the jacket is there.. The alleged killer’s movement were tracked by 14 witnesses at the scene, or along Patton St.. 11 of them said it was Oswald.. 2said it looked a lot like Oswald, and one said he didn’t get a good enough look to ID anyone.. 2of these witnesses followed the killer when he turned on Jefferson St.. At a distance, because he was armed.. And they lost him near a Texaco gas station/ used car lot.. Another witness see the same man in the Texaco parking lot.. All 3 said the alleged killer was wearing a light colored jacket, and all 3 said it was Oswald they saw.. And remember, WE KNOW this person murdered the officer, because he was never out of sight from witnesses along his escape route, until Reynolds and Patterson lose him at the Texaco.. And immediately after, Mary Brock sees him in the Texaco parking lot, wasp king briskly towards the back of the parking lot… Where a light colored jacket is found.. The jacket, itself, is IDed by Marina Oswald as Lee Oswald’s jacket.. And fibers on the inside lining matched the shirt Oswald was arrested in.. And this was an unusual shirt, with a spectrum of 75 colors, per thread, ranging from brown to yellow.. And of course, Oswald is arrested without his jacket, which we know he was wearing.. A light colored Eisenhower jacket.. Now, there’s only one reason why Lee would be discarding his jacket in that parking lot.. The jacket is devastating evidence.. It buttresses the shells and proves they weren’t switched, and it buttresses the IDs, which conspiracy believes always gripe about.. Most definitely a cop killer.. How that effects your thought on JFK is up to you..

The jacket was found about the same time Oswald was arrested.. And he was arrested without a jacket.. What did he do with HIS JACKET, if the one found wasn’t his?.. Did 2 people toss their jackets that afternoon?.. Both light colored?.. Both looking enough like Oswald that 14 witnesses, none of whom said it wasn’t Oswald, got it wrong?!.. lol.. And we know it wasn’t switched in police custody, because Capt Westbrook took possession of the jacket at the scene, from under a car, and he later IDed the jacket to the Warren Commission as the jacket he found.. Lol.. Do you really make excuses for cop killers?.. Just so you can feel smart?..

The man in that parking lot was the killer of Officer Tippit.. And the 3 witnesses who place the killer in or around that parking lot said it was Oswald.. He’s arrested with the pistol that matched the shells at the scene.. He was arrested with extra shells OF BOTH TYPES the killer used to murder Officer Tippit, Remington and Winchester.. lol.. And 11 of 14 witnesses of this event, or it’s aftermath, said Oswald was the man they saw.. And of the remaining 3?.. 2 said it looked a lot like Oswald, and the final guy said he didn’t get a good enough look to ID anyone.. NONE OF THEM said it wasn’t Oswald.. He woulda got sent to the chair after 15 minutes jury deliberation with evidence like that against him.. He’s guilty..

Maybe this is what they want you to think

Throw the picture out. Go ahead, throw it out. Now let’s talk about the mountain of other evidence that says Oswald did indeed do it, and the non existence of anything substantial that says he didn’t. Thats where it gets real for you guys, and you just won’t admit it.

no , but its supposed to be.

It's supporting evidence for the overwhelming case against Oswald.

@@robertromero8692 There is no "overwhelming case" against LHO and never was. Firstly, we seem to keep forgetting that the official position of the US government is that there probably WAS a conspiracy. AS found by the HSCA in 1979. The next official body to look into the JFK assassination was the AARB. Its chief council would be one of the world's leading experts on the case having taken hundreds of witness depositions and seen documents few others have. I would think his opinion would be definitive. He stated: “I am convinced that Oswald would have been found ‘not guilty’. Beyond a reasonable doubt, to me there is no question, he is "not guilty" beyond a reasonable doubt.” - Jeremy Gunn, Chief Council for the Assassination Records Review Board . And dont get me started on the "JFK challenge" created by Barry Kursch to settle the matter in front of a neutral , profesional arbitration board. No person claiming an "overwhelming case" against LHO has taken the challange-NOT one. Considering that the winner gets from 55,000$ to a Million dollars you would think such an easy case would have some takers......

@@JohnJohnson-pq4qz “Jeremy Gunn, Chief Council for the Assassination Records Review Board” Spare me the argument from authority. Plenty of other legal experts have declared Oswald guilty. In fact, he WAS found guilty in London with a real Dallas judge and jury, a real prosecutor, a real defense attorney, and real witnesses.

@@robertromero8692 that was not a real trial. It was a show trial for TV.

Yes let's spin this and pretend Oswald Acted Alone which is impossible.