Okays Bhai

(Quran 58:14): "Have you not seen those who ally themselves with a people with whom Allah is displeased? They are neither with you nor with them. And they swear to lies knowingly."

Haq or batil mai jeet haq ki hoti hai Best of luck sir

Sir, I have good knowledge about KZfaq video SEO. And I will do it for the sake of Allah, if you can allow me to show my SEO skills on your channel.

Walaikum Salam:)

O Bhai Dua se kuch nhi hota it's all fake 🤥

@@theabstudios3174 if u are not Muslim whatever u say for me it’s worthless But if u are Muslim dua se sahi rasta nazar ata hai u will not understand Jab tak kr k nahi dekho ge I experience lots of time in my life Alhamdullila

@@abdulwahab9932 bro it's all fluke

@@theabstudios3174 Your existence is not dua. Get a life before you become a fertilizer for the soil.

@the AB studios who told you this???? Is there any science principles that give rise to this conclusion.

That guy is a nihilist scum who just wants to look good by uttering imported bs in a pseudo confident manner.

Same situation

You guys believe him bcoz she is Pakistani...it you accept her as terrorist...it makes your country bad.... Pakistani are known as terrorist sympathiser

سید مزمل کہتا اپنے آپ سید ہے لیکن میں نے اسے کافی دفعہ سنا ہے لیکن یہ شخص الحاد پسند ہے اور زیادہ اپنے ویلاگز میں مغرب کی تعریف کرے اور اسلام کو ایک تنگ نظر ،ظالم دیکھنے کر کوشش کرے گا

How come his views are reality based and Muzammil's views are false? Do you have some vieowometer to measure the sanctity of views?😅

Better to not watch these type of videos, so there views remain minimum and report such content.

1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

​@@Saarimul_masloolUnapologetic Who?

@@mizoid Muzamil guy

Reply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

@@awaisahmed8095 You've been spamming the comments section with this same copy paste comment. What's your issue? Go and post a video on your channel.

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Ameen

Ameen.

Lol bibble? According to scholars of bibble they dont even know who wrote bibble secondly bibble has tones of contradictions. So keep your bibble to yourself plz as its a man made religion. Jesus(PBUH) never even once said what christians today claim. Thanks

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

I agree with youu.

@@musawerkhan1259 thanks 👍

​@@ISknowledge7299 I Agree With You Brother/Sister

No he use a technique where he tells 70 to 80 percent truth and between the lines he promote his liberal sh*t. This phenomenon called hallucination. It often happen when you talking to a AI chat bot or model .

​@@prowest6715 agree

NO people agree with him because of his big mouth and his empty noise. Liberal jerks will drop to any extent to please their masters of europe.

True

Yar jab syed muzamal sahab jb baat karta hai to mujhe lagta hai jese bacha bol raha hai pori video dekhta he nhi band kardeta hoon haha

@@AbuBakar-oe9so ۔۔میرا لوڈا سید

No, people agree with him because he is a landay ka liberal.

Reply from muzzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

@@awaisahmed8095 Where did he reply this?

​@@shahjahan2108Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Reply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

@@Logicalsane both men and women should be helped. Why discriminate?

Ameen may Allah destroy Criminals of europe and their ideological prostitutes here.

​@STRONG Exodus 21:7 “If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do." Leviticus 25:44 “’Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves." 1 Samuel 15:3 "Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Ye jihadi ort ab ameriki fojiyo ke niche lety hogy

True 😀

Spot on!

Oo bhai kedi attractive vocabulary😂😂.. Word power made easy padlaay... Sabhki vocabulary muzamil say bhi achi hojaye ghi.

9 bands nhi ae unky ajj tak

have u ever tried to litsen to hum even?

litsen to Muzammil for once atleast before you take your side and think rationally

​@@xherii You assume he didn't listen to muzamil?

​@@xheriienjoy the jahalat that's visible in most of the comments as ziada tar ko tu samjhnay ke capacity tk nai

Truth and sensible are the opposite of muzammil..he is puppet just like desi liberals of sub-continent

​​@@xherii I watched his video and he presented the narrative of America in his video by quoting Declan wash...I read two of Hamid mir columns and he wrote in his columns that I went to her family they showed me proofs that Dr aafia was never an American Citizen nor he married twice....Hamid mir is doing journalism even before the birth of syed muzamil...

Thanks brother Zamrood ❤ It was necessary

Reply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Dalle our antim dalal ki gulami ke karn tum nich janvaro ka bran dad ho chuka hai isi lia is jihadi ort ko support kr rahe ho wo to ab American fojiyo ke niche lety hogy

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

@@awaisahmed8095 3rd vedio ka reoly bi unone diya he 3 din pehle

@@prowest6715 no not at all.

@@prowest6715 But if somebody claims to be an intellectual he should support his claims through the evidence

@@prowest6715 if he doesn't fulfill these conditions but he is credible with his arguments. He has intellectual ownership but a little.

مزمل صاحب کا یہ دوغلہ پن صرف ان لوگوں کے لئے ہوتا ہے جو اسلام کو فالو کرتے ہیں اور یہ شخص یہ بھی بھول گیا کہ سارا دن عورتوں کے حقوق کے لئے بولنے والا بھول گیا یہ آفیہ صدیقی ایک عورت ہے اور اسی طرح ملالہ کا نکاح کے خلاف بولنے کے بعد مطیرہ اور وینا ملک نے اس کے بارے میں ٹویٹ کیا تو اس نے وہ طنز و اور عزت کی دھجیاں اڑائی ان دونوں کی ۔تب بھی یہ بھول گئے تھے دونوں عورتیں اور اسی طرح جب رابی پیرزادہ اسلام کی تبلیغ کی تو تب بھی یہ اس کو پاگل اور سعیکو کہہ رہا تھا کہ اس کا دماغ خراب ہے اس لئے اسلام کو فالو کرتی ہے تب آزادی رائے اور عورت کہاں چلی جاتی ہے ان کی۔ یہ دوگلا پن نہیں ہے کیا آپ کو اس بات کی سمجھ نہیں آتی کہ کس قدر اس کی باتیں گول مول کر کے یہ صرف اسلام اسلام کے خلاف استعمال کرتا ہے

Why you don't support raja?

Believe raja

@@aurangzeb866 Because wo mainstream Islam se hatkar modern touch Dene ki koshish karte hai...from what i saw

My request to you is liberals frequently lie , just don't follow them , they are poisoning our minds

Reply from muzzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

raja is ready to have a debate but shah is scared.

​@@Servant_0f_Allah.shah never debates because all his false arguments come from west

Not few books ,only books of west

Not even books just material on internet

Thanks god even he don't read arabic books😂😂😂

Syed Muzamil Shah take side of USA because USA is a rich country and he likes USA. RIP honesty of Syed Muzamil Shah 👎.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

​@@awaisahmed8095 bro....I really respect and appreciate his analysation as well. Love his research... I'm only saying that Syed muzamil should not avoid from a healthy debate. It would be more informative and mind boggling.

@@khawandbakhsh792 To jo Qasair bol reacher bhai aur fbi ka agent aisi batain kernay walay healthy disscussion ho sekti hai kya?

Watch video again on the topic of her husband and uncle.

Good sir. I think your condemnation or protest won't make any difference in world. This is a 21st century lolly pop given to you guys that make 0 difference.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

Muzammil is dishonest. He is a puppet of those western based ngos and western based literature who thinks that only west created all the tech etc when thats not the truth, even today many things that you enjoy were discovered by the muslims, even the scientific method was discovered by the muslims!

He is not young and he is not learning ,His intellect comes from west

You’re so naive Muzammil is not that young learner

@@maryammati5511 exactly always giving examples of west

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Who are you and what??

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

​@@awaisahmed8095 I love his detailed reply.

Many men are in much worse conditions but no one cares...why should she be helped just because she's a woman?? Men should be helped and she should be ignored

You guys host Osama bindlem and groomed ajmal kashab...what more evidence you need Pakistan military support terrorist

Rich USA: + Syed Muzamil: I think + Rich USA: 1 + 1 = 5 Syed Muzamil: I think 5 Rich USA: Dr Afia is terrorist Syed Muzamil: I think terrorist

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

Response: kzfaq.infoProp18fE8dw?feature=share

I noticed when he called Yvonne an Islamist. Shows what he was trying to do

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

You are baloch man. Muzammil speak for balochistan. Think again .

​@@SamyakHinge I speak for Balochs too, does it mean I'm allowed to lie about other things!? Seriously 😒

@Sehr J I don't know the case of Dr. Aafiya. But I think muzzamil speaks balanced. There are some points we can disagree about. Overall Muzammil is good personality to follow rather than this dumb kaiser raja.

@@SamyakHinge I'm neither a blind fan of Muzzamil Shah nor Qaiser. I have been following him from 5 years and I agree 💯 with him in some points but it's fact he is biased and many times he made one sided videos lacking the full knowledge of the other side and blame Islam for an individual act when it has nothing to do with it. This "dumb" Qaiser Ahmed Raja is at least honest, he doesn't pretend to be "fake neural" and especially this video does make a lot of sense and answers to Muzummil Shah recent videos. Muzummil is blaming the woman who was sold by Generals (like many phaktuns and Balochs) while referring to the article written by an American but also ignoring a lot of points which goes against his stance and there's no proof against her as she and her kids were kidnapped and later sold by Mushraff, she was sexually assaulted by American soldiers and this was exposed by her lawyer and the other witnesses. Even American human rights Agencies are protesting for Afia because everyone can see the missing information about her case and is she actually a criminal!? you can study this case yourself, I can send you the link of one articlewww.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/21/us-pakistan-protests-release-neuroscientist-aafia-siddiqui well this is not his first time making one sided videos. This man is so focused about one man's party whether they are in government or opposition and will make indirect Islamophobic videos but won't say anything about journalists that are murdered or kidnapped journalists!! I don't care if he is atheist (it's his personal Matter) but he is biased and manipulative. You can't just reject someone's factual arguments by just calling him dumb, Qaiser did reply to his video by points and references. You can criticise Qaiser Ahmed Raja if he's making a false statement or you don't agree with his idea.

@@sehrj1144 🤝🤝

Aap jaisay logo ka bus chalay tou ghade ko bhi intellectual kaha doo

Har bnda jo confidently baat krta h wo. Intelligent nahi hota Kuch log soch smjh kr b bolte hain... 😂 ​@@osamarehman3120

Rply from muzamil 1. Thrice in the video, you said that I called Dr. Aafia a terr0rist. Your own rebuttal is more based on lies. Find me 1 instance in my video where I have called her a terrorist. In fact I’ve called out the Americans for k!lling half a million people in Iraq and human rights abuses (illegal extradition of 4000 Pakistanis to America under Musharraf). 2. You mentioned that i am oblivious to the charges against Aafia. I condemned the fact that Aafia was taken to America and said it twice in my video that a case could only be pursued either in the country where the alleged crime was committed or her home country (which is the same conclusion you have reached). 3. I didn’t say she was making b0mbs. AlJazeera reported that whilst interviewing the Governor of Ghazni. Another false accusation on me (which you’re pretty accustomed to). 4. I myself mentioned Yuvon Ridley’s statement that Aafia was in Bagram and I didn’t say that all the evidence suggests that she was on the lose. This particular nuance in the case is so murky that you can find evidence to support any of the assertions (her being in Bagram or Pakistan). If her husband lied, why did we never hear him on the media and you also avoided replying to the absence of her son who accompanied her to Afghanistan and could be visibly seen in the video in Ghazni reported by AlJazeera. 5. Nowhere in the video I mentioned that she was a scientist who could make b0mbs. My video starts with the fact that she was a neuroscientist. Guess you skipped that part. 6. Please present evidence of Al-Baluchi’s family’s denial that the marriage took place. 7. I did not even mention that Khalid Sheikh gave Aafia’s name up so how could I mention that he was waterboarded? I completely ignored that fact because I know of the t0rture that took place in jail. You replied to something I didn’t even say. 8. The only thing you found which was worthy of a retort is the affidavit of Aafia’s uncle. The entire premise of your video is that Declan Walsh peddled the narrative of FBI and his entire report is wrong and a blatant lie. Well here’s my answer, the day Declan Walsh will be sued and the day he fails to present the interview recordings of Aafia’s uncle and the day he will lose the case will be the day I’d take down my video and apologise. You yourself said that the evidence Aafia wasn’t involved in making expl0sives was that she wasn’t convicted of that crime (which I agree with). By using the same principle you set, just because Walsh was never sued for his report by anyone (or his other works like 9 Lives of Pakistan which you didn’t even mention), I can quote him and it stands a fact. This principle is used globally that a report which is never challenged by any party could stand as a fact. Hence, I disagree there. Walsh wasn’t even challenged by Aafia’s family. So what Qaisar Raja says about him is irrelevant. 9. Lastly, you got personal and hit below the belt by calling me a propagandist for Western Powers. Could you prove it? You keep saying that I get personal but here, everyone could see who got personal. That happens when frustration becomes evident. It’s not difficult to see who is a propagandist for the parties who were in power (MMA) when Aafia was taken away by the Americans. Keep using it for political mileage only (how cunningly you skipped the data is quoted for honour killings and your silence on it). All of you aren’t doing this for a cause of a woman’s sanctity. Otherwise, Pakistani women come first. American later.

YOU CAN CALL IT *LIBERALENCEPHALY* A MENTAL DISORDER WHERE LIBERALS HAVE ONLY A PART OF A BRAIN BECAUSE OF THE IDEOLOGICAL PROSTITUTION THAT THESE GUYS ARE INVOLVED IN.