Why The Allies Couldn't Overcome German Trenches in Spring 1917 (WW1 Documentary)

Рет қаралды 1,947,872

2 жыл бұрын

Watch our WW2 Documentary series 16 Days in Berlin on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/16-days-in-b...
The Allied 1917 Spring Offensive masterminded by French general Robert Nivelle was supposed to end the stalemate on the Western Front and bring a decisive breakthrough. But the German Army also knew they couldn't win the war on the offensive and thus prepared a new type of defensive system: The Hindenburg Line and it would be tested in the Battles of Arras (Vimy Ridge, Bullecourt) and Chemins des Dames (Aisne).
» SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
Patreon: / thegreatwar
Nebula: www.nebula.tv/the-great-war
» THANKS TO OUR CO-PRODUCERS
John Ozment, James Darcangelo, Jacob Carter Landt, Thomas Brendan, Kurt Gillies, Scott Deederly, John Belland, Adam Smith, Taylor Allen, Rustem Sharipov, Christoph Wolf, Simen Røste, Marcus Bondura, Ramon Rijkhoek, Theodore Patrick Shannon, Philip Schoffman, Avi Woolf,
» SOURCES
Cook, Tim, “Storm Troops: Combat Effectiveness and the Canadian Corps in 1917” in Dennis, Jeffrey & Grey, Peter (eds), 1917: Tactics, Training and Technology: the 2007 Chief of Army's Military History Conference, (Canberra : Australian History Military Publications, 2007)
Coombes, David, Bloody Bullecourt, (Barnsley : Pen & Sword Military, 2016)
Doughty, Robert T, Pyrrhic Victory: French Strategy and Operations in the Great War, (Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2005)
Doughty, Robert A, “How did France Weather the Troubles of 1917?” in Dennis, Jeffrey & Grey, Peter (eds), 1917: Tactics, Training and Technology: the 2007 Chief of Army's Military History Conference, (Canberra : Australian History Military Publications, 2007)
Farr, Don, A Battle Too Far: Arras 1917, (Warwick ; Helion & Company, 2018)
Foley, Robert T, “The Other Side of the Wire: The German Army in 1917” in Dennis, Jeffrey & Grey, Peter (eds), 1917: Tactics, Training and Technology: the 2007 Chief of Army's Military History Conference, (Canberra : Australian History Military Publications, 2007)
Lupfer, Timothy T, “The Dynamics of Doctrine: The Changes in German Tactical Doctrine During the First World War” Leavenworth Papers, No. 4, Combat Studies Institute
U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, (Fort Leavenworth, KS : 1981)
Nicholls, Jonathan, Cheerful Sacrifice: The Battle of Arras 1917, (London : Leo Cooper, 1990)
» OUR SISTER CHANNEL
/ realtimehistory
»CREDITS
Presented by: Jesse Alexander
Written by: Jesse Alexander
Director: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
Director of Photography: Toni Steller
Sound: Toni Steller
Editing: Jose Gamez
Motion Design: Philipp Appelt
Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: above-zero.com
Research by: Jesse Alexander
Fact checking: Florian Wittig
Channel Design: Yves Thimian
Contains licensed material by getty images
Maps: MapTiler/OpenStreetMap Contributors & GEOlayers3
All rights reserved - Real Time History GmbH 2022

Пікірлер: 1 200

@matthewmallan1164 2 жыл бұрын

The more you learn about this conflict, the more utterly depressing it gets. What an amazingly sad war. What a waste of some of the finest men that ever lived.

@firingallcylinders2949 2 жыл бұрын

That's most wars unfortunately. We're seeing it right now. How many Russian and Ukrainian men that should be raising families, working jobs, advancing their societies instead are dying.

@strikeforce1500 2 жыл бұрын

But think of the poor generals/officers back at home, how else they gonna make it into history and glory?! /s

@kpl455 2 жыл бұрын

And it set the ground for an even worse war and time ahead.

@squamish4244 Жыл бұрын

It was a war started over nothing, fought over nothing, leaving a mess that could hardly be worse behind. Civilization is still dealing with the setbacks it caused.

@joeya6795 Жыл бұрын

Wars are a necessary evil, unfortunately. Men need to die in order for children to take their place.

@leonardusgroenendyk6027 Жыл бұрын

Yes the Germans were suffering from man power losses. My family lost seven of the eight brothers by 1916. The eighth was my grandfather who was to young for WW one. But served in the Luftwaffe in WW two. There the family also lost six relatives. May they rest in peace.

@Explorers_YT Жыл бұрын

its actually kinda cool to hear but sorry for your losses although u didnt know them

@reglisse42 Жыл бұрын

I have almost the same story with my French family, they lost four of the five boys in WW1, the fifth was my grandfather who was to young born in 1906 …peace for them

@securitycameras341 Жыл бұрын

My condolences.

@michaldurakiewicz3501 Жыл бұрын

Your ancestors probably killed my ancestors out of cold blood

@jupphainkas3070 Жыл бұрын

@@reglisse42 My condoloces. And I wish peace for US today aswell. I really cannot believe that our two peoples did this to each other; I spend all my holidays in France. Every year. I like the french people very much. Best wishes.

@indianajones4321 2 жыл бұрын

Back to the First World War! This really takes me back to watching the weekly episodes… I was actually gonna be starting my seventh tour through the series soon. I like the recent content from this channel, but I’ve missed seeing WW1 content so much

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

we had a craving too and this won't be the last video this year

@indianajones4321 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGreatWar thank you so much Great War team for all of your hard work

@weltvonalex 2 жыл бұрын

Same here :) so much outstanding content it's amazing

@mammuchan8923 2 жыл бұрын

Back to the classic, FWW is still the most fascinating time in history for me. Indiana I have also done a few repeat viewings of the series from scratch, it never gets boring. Thanks Jesse loved the revisit, looking forward to seeing more🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

@shaider1982 2 жыл бұрын

I learned that the real dynamic duo was Hindenburg and Ludendorf while Cadorna and Holtzendorf were certified geniuses😂

@Cotswolds1913 2 жыл бұрын

More of this kind of content please! Don't be afraid to go back into the war years just because the chronological real-time episodes are done.

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

there will be more

@Cotswolds1913 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGreatWar Glad to hear it.

@alexamerling79 2 жыл бұрын

Agreed!

@royfairchild6895 9 ай бұрын

I could listen to this guy talk about war all day long. Perfect annunciation, his voice is a relief to hear.

@jessealexander2695 8 ай бұрын

Thanks!

@lexdunn4160 Жыл бұрын

My great uncle Charles O'Brien was part of a machine gun crew at Vimy. He was wounded, but not too badly. He never spoke of his experiences in that brutal, useless war when he returned to Nova Scotia.

@craigobrien31 Жыл бұрын

A lot did not ever speek of what they seen

@anananasyiyen Жыл бұрын

So u are irish?

@nicflatterie7772 Жыл бұрын

Nova Scotia is a Canadian province.

@lexdunn4160 Жыл бұрын

@@anananasyiyen Canadian

@steveburgess9180 Жыл бұрын

It's sad to say that hundreds of thousands of us, if we take a brief look into our ancestry, will find one if not more people who fought in that tragic war. Fortunately, my grandfather survived, one of five brothers. He joined in 1916 after his brothers Frank and Patrick were killed. John died six months later, and Cyril, at just 19, was killed in September 1918 at Looes two days after his birthday. A terrible waste of human life.

@Lokster 2 жыл бұрын

Never forgetting this channel, even without Indy you guys are supreme

@strikeone7803 2 жыл бұрын

what happened to him? haven't watched their videos in a while....their notifications stopped showing for me now that I think of it

@snapdragon6601 2 жыл бұрын

Same. I didn't know he was gone. This channel is still great.

@Tepic88 2 жыл бұрын

@@strikeone7803 Indy has moved to a World War Two channel, weekly covering that conflict.

@Lukastar1 2 жыл бұрын

Wow Lokster you’re here?!

@kensterknig177 2 жыл бұрын

What happened to Indy llydel ???

@benrlego 2 жыл бұрын

The Spring Offensive was my entry into this channel, already 5 years ago… Very glad to see a return to the war years, I believe there is still more that can be gained from covering parts of the war in this format. Some things get lost in the week-by-week coverage.

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

that was our thought too

@extrahistory8956 2 жыл бұрын

I love to see The Great War channel get more experimental this year, which has also benefited its viewership. While I miss the bimonthly chronological coverage of post WW1 content, I recognize that it wasn't getting that many views, and that a change of pace was necessary. Also, it's not like you outright abandoned it, so I'm excited to see TGW team rap up the Greco-Turkish War, the Irish Civil War, the Russian Revolution, and many other events by 2023/1923.

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

yeah on KZfaq you need to go with the times, probably the only hard rule there is

@extrahistory8956 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGreatWar Very true. That said, I'm curious about a couple of things: -Will guys continue the coverage of post-WW1 Central Asia? Y'all left it in a cliffhanger back in Oct 2020, so I'll be interested in seeing it's conclusion. -Will y'all make another post-WW1 video on South Africa? -Will you cover the Egyptian Revolution at some point?

@uioongbion2074 Жыл бұрын

@@extrahistory8956 Shut up. Do you manage this channel?

@mb-electricalservices Жыл бұрын

@@uioongbion2074 What a lovely human being you are......

@Dungeon_of_Regret Жыл бұрын

This is so freaking detailed. More please.

@praetorian3902 Жыл бұрын

The size of artilleries in WW1 will always impress me. It's something out of an alternate timeline sci-fi book.

@stephenconey4841 Жыл бұрын

Great video, very well done. As an aside, at the Battle of Arras a young Irish officer named Clive Staples Lewis was seriously wounded by friendly fire and the war ended for him. This was years before he even thought of writing the Chronicles of Narnia.

@gorilla1988 8 ай бұрын

Tolkien was at the Somme

@dosidicusgigas1376 2 жыл бұрын

Something Ive always found fascinating about world war 1, specifically the later years is the advent of combined arms warfare. Coordination between aircraft, infantry, armor and artillery quickly became vital to victory. It's a huge contrast to the back & forth attrition tactics of 1915-1916 (although attrition was still a primary strategy until the end of the war).

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

yeah that's the true evolution that took place towards the end of the war, that often gets glossed over when talking about trench warfare.

@christopherbell2091 2 жыл бұрын

All it took was 1 general with agood dose of common sense and command of his nations troops and he showed the world how to win the war late 1917 into 1918 with carefull planning and full co ordination of all forces in his command synchronized in a welllanned well led offensive ,the general , Sir John Monash

@wizofoz0605 2 жыл бұрын

@@christopherbell2091 Correct, it was Monash who finally put the pieces of the puzzle together, beginning at Hamel, and the after requesting the Canadians join the battle on the Australian right, (he didn't trust the French Provincial troops stationed there.) it was the Battle of Amien which finally broke German defences and to a lesser extent, morale. The black day of the German war had arrived

@modelrailwaynoob Жыл бұрын

WWI

@simonnachreiner8380 Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately like during the Napoleonic Wars when the importance of supporting Infantry with cavalry (To attack the flank) and cavalry with artillery (to break square formations) was pioneered the importance of combined arms was lost during the interwar period was each branch began to bicker about "Who really won the war"

@tillposer 2 жыл бұрын

My grandfather served as an infantry officer with the Grenadierregiment 10, right on the edge of the Army group Arras at St. Laurent Blangy on an island in the Scarpe. The positions were overrun very quickly on the morning of April 9 and he escaped by the skin of his teeth, being shot at and wounded by a Scottish soldier in the process. His memoirs are very vivid, describing the Semaine de Souffrance of the preliminary artillery bombardment and the helter-skelter flight in great detail.

@noreply-7069 Жыл бұрын

Very interesting! Thanks for sharing.

@cruelty6368 2 жыл бұрын

Really great presentation. I especially love that no cheap, phony sound effects were added to the footage, the first time I've seen anyone do that in a Great War documentary. Thank you.

@DotepenecPL 2 жыл бұрын

Man, I can't believe it's been five years already since this offensive was covered the first time at the channel, in the weekly episodes. I am glad you decided to get back to these events in more detail.

@TedJameson 2 жыл бұрын

And thank you for giving plenty of air time to the French perspective! So many English language sources (even high quality well researched ones) acts as though the Western Front was just Little Britain vs the Hun.

@jessealexander2695 2 жыл бұрын

That was an absolute priority for this episode!

@matthewwhitton5720 2 жыл бұрын

Yes ! That is so very true ! At times, watching other channels, one could be stupidly misled into the utterly spurious notion that France was ‘ merely ‘ a battleground for the British Empires forces to clash with the ‘ Hun ‘. Preposterous !

@celtspeaksgoth7251 2 жыл бұрын

@@matthewwhitton5720 I thought the French army imploded after Verdun - so it was solely British Empire forces after that

@vortex1603 2 жыл бұрын

@@celtspeaksgoth7251 Imploded ? I think the French soldiers were more numerous than the British troops on the Western Front, even after Verdun. They always defended a larger warfront than the British.

@Taurox220 2 жыл бұрын

@@celtspeaksgoth7251 not at all. Verdun was a French victory and the French were the main allied land force on the Western front

@kryts27 2 жыл бұрын

A bit dissappointed that the battle of Pashendale in Belgium (an allied offensive) was not canvassed in this discussion. I lost a relative in this battle. At this time, the weather gods were on the side of the Germans. Above normal early summer rains turned the battlefield into a quagmire, which made even the movements of troops, let alone supplies and equipment, that much more difficult than if the weather stayed normal for that season. Hundreds, if not thousands of men drowed in the churned-up boggy mire. Some of them were fit men, simply weighed down with the weight of munitions and supplies until they slipped and fell or dissappeared into the mire.

@lordgarion514 2 жыл бұрын

When you think you're having a bad day, keep in mind that those men we saw taking a nap in the dirt side of the trench, were most likely having one of the best parts of their day.

@firingallcylinders2949 2 жыл бұрын

I often remember when thinking about complaining, there are people in the world that would love to live your worst day.

@nebras__ 2 жыл бұрын

Truly appreciated comment. Whenever I think of how ugly were the years of war here in Syria or there in Ukraine I think of these men of fought and wasted their lives/years in these ugly wars. I feel sorry for them ,and think how meaningless life is, and how we are so privileged to live now rather than 60/100/200 years ago.

@Kruppt808 Жыл бұрын

all kinds of diseases spreading, lice, rats, raining up to your hips sometimes, bombardment for hours, days, not seeing daylight, watching friends die quickly if you were lucky, slowly if not or permanently injured, bad food, imo leadership that rated from ok, to negligent to criminal. Before the French Mutiny, not having the front line troops changed out enough, no R&R for burnt out shell shocked units...... Dante's Inferno imo.

@steelbear2063 Жыл бұрын

"When you are sad think of a more sad thing to be double-sad"

@rikkithinn7258 Жыл бұрын

@@nebras__ Death is never meaningless.

@johnkevill470 2 жыл бұрын

I love this! This is a better full-scale analysis than the chronological episodes- more specifics on the tactical evolution here, which is what really fascinates me. Thanks for your work, Mr. Jesse Alexander and the Great War team

@WargamesTonight 2 жыл бұрын

Well done. Nice job showing the evolution of technique - especially the decentralization of command and the development of reverse slope and elastic defense tactics and their impact on the battlefield. Really well done.

@bozotro Жыл бұрын

There were Canadian battalions that were integrated with indigenous members. My Great Uncle (47th Battalion, CEF) fought alongside at least one at Vimy.

@jaredflurry937 Жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing. Even a “white” Canadian might have wanted to channel the First People part of his heritage.

@j2174 Жыл бұрын

@Graf von Losinj Why?

@j2174 Жыл бұрын

@@jaredflurry937 Why?

@jaredflurry937 Жыл бұрын

@@j2174 Before D-Day, many American paratroopers cut their hair into Mohawks and put on “native” war paint. It seems easy to imagine that a Canadian soldier, especially one with native ancestry, would do something similar to prepare a “warrior” persona for battle. There’s so much gravity and drama in a first-person narrative of WWI; it seems unusual that the author would fabricate something. Seems more likely that the “truth is stranger than fiction” and that he was truly encountering Canadian troops who had put on war paint to pump themselves up for going over the top.

@blakeskidmore523 Жыл бұрын

@@j2174 The same reason a Christian soldier might pray. Ritual is important to men in battle for many reasons. I imagine this soldier could have covered himself in the war paint of his ancestors as a soldiers ritual, a warriors ritual. Hoping it would intimidate his enemies and bring him success in battle. Maybe to honor his ancestors. Maybe just personal comfort to a nervous young man heading into mortal peril. This story doesn't sound like a fantasy at all. Nobody is going to discipline a soldier in the middle of an attack because he has some face paint on and isn't wearing proper cover.

@TedJameson 2 жыл бұрын

Hey!! I was just thinking to myself that i would love to see some more 1914-1918 content from you guys. Love it! :)

@rikterandersson3568 2 жыл бұрын

I would love a special on the ''what if's''. For example talk about the anti-ludendorff clique in German High Command who wanted to win in Italy and close all tertiary fronts down in 1918 rather than the Kaiserschlachts. Or talk about the potential plans for 1919! There were so many interesting things going on. Love these!

@ferdblu1946 2 жыл бұрын

Great idea!

@indianajones4321 2 жыл бұрын

That’s a really cool idea

@yolomanolo2601 2 жыл бұрын

Would have been a better timeline for Europe if CP somehow won :( The wrong side was victorious sadly.

@jakobrinsdorf7791 2 жыл бұрын

@@yolomanolo2601 how would it have been better, what do you think?

@Skewebjor 2 жыл бұрын

@@jakobrinsdorf7791 If the Germans hadn't lost maybe there where no Hitler and no USSR as a superpower. But this is not for sure. After all a victorious german Kaiserreich could have continued to democratize itself like the other monarchies in europe.

@rafeyos3396 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for making this! As someone who had multiple family members at vimy ridge during the battle, all of whom either refused to speak of the war or died during it or from later causes related to it, it is nice to understand more about what happened there.

@dclark142002 2 жыл бұрын

When you finally take your hard earned learnings into your offensive plans...and then discover that your enemy has ALSO adapted, and adapted better and more quickly than you have...

@jeremyd1869 Жыл бұрын

Excellent and fascinating! I've read quite a bit about WW1 over the years but have never seen such a detailed and clear explanation of the elastic defense. Well done!

@herptek Жыл бұрын

Depth of a defensive position may have decisive importance for the outcome of a decisive battle.

@linming5610 Жыл бұрын

This battle shows the importance of short but steady gains over mass breakthroughs in a very contested area. Thank you for your video.

@democratssuck8610 2 жыл бұрын

What an amazing video. Thank you. The pictures and videos were amazing

@E_T_ 2 жыл бұрын

This channel is by far my most favorite history channel.

@edmedlin2109 2 жыл бұрын

Such a terrific job you are doing! I’m totally hooked. Keep it up - please!

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

we will

@DanteTheAbyssalBeing Жыл бұрын

I can't imagine witnessing the soul-destroying death and devastation of WW1 at 17 years of age. Must have been horrendous for them.

@szabo50 2 жыл бұрын

this is the only time , I encountered, that tactics have been explained this clearly in such a concise manner

@johnadams5489 2 жыл бұрын

This is the BEST analysis of changes in tactics in WW1. Great Job.

@OriginalMergatroid Жыл бұрын

Those new tactics for Vimy Ridge were designed by Canadian Arthur Currie. He believed it was smart to learn lessons from earlier attacks that had failed and cost so many lives. He had the men practice the attack in Britain, evn going so far as having the layout of the practice area similar to the actual battlefield, and having them practice the timing of advancing under a creeping barrage of artilary. The changes he recommended at a lecture

@colinhunt4057 7 ай бұрын

Quite right. Arthur Currie is by far the most brilliant soldier and commander ever to emerge from the Canadian army. He managed the epic stand of the Canadians in 1915 at 2nd Ypres. In 1918, his was the leadership of the Canadian corps during the epic Hundred Days offensive. He won a string of victories including the incredible crossing of the Canal Du Nord as the Canadians were among the principal formations in routing the German army out of France and back into Belgium. During that time, Currie showed that he could handle battles of maneuvre rather than only set-piece battles like Vimy. HIs recognition by Canadians should be far larger than it is. That can be blamed on the spite and hatred of Prime Minister McKenzie King for anything connected to the military in Canada. King was a despicable man who refused to attend the commissioning of the Vimy Memorial in1936. He was quite rightly despised by all WW1 veterans.

@moss8702 Жыл бұрын

Nivelle makes me so angry. Years into the war and he learned nothing. Discarding the German defenses as a whole despite the war being one of endemic stalemate shows how disgusting most WW1 commanders were with lives of their men. I don't understand why they thought it was too hard to observe the line thoroughly, reissue and design a plan based off of the newly formed line, and then keep your mouth shut about it. It bewilders me.

@ledoynier3694 Жыл бұрын

You basically summarized one of the main causes of the french defeat in 1940. Old commanders stuck in their obsolete beliefs, misusing an army that could have fought with success otherwise.

@anthonyeaton5153 Жыл бұрын

Gentlemen, the French and British and Canadian and Aussie generals were the winners, the German generals were the losers. Keep your perspective.

@anthonyeaton5153 Жыл бұрын

General Pershing had watched WW1 for three years and on the first big action by the Americans they charged headlong into m/gun fire without artillery support. He didn’t learn either.

@moss8702 Жыл бұрын

@@anthonyeaton5153 We won the Battle of Cantigny with very few losses compared to the French and British. The next major battles were Belleau Wood and Chateu. We didn't have the artillery or air support at the time. But almost all of our offenses were highly successful

@josephahner3031 Жыл бұрын

@@ledoynier3694 the French doctrine of the second world war was a modern, developed doctrine. It was not at all dated or obsolete. It was the French reliance on obsolete communication methods that doomed them in 1940. Their combat doctrine was fine and where the French communication system did work, the French Army took quite a toll on the attacking Wehrmacht. The problem was that the German Panzer and motorized forces spearheading the attack were faster than the French communication runners once the telephone wires were cut.

@HippoPete Жыл бұрын

great channel, this is very well presented and put together. thank you for the hard work!

@rodgerjohnson3375 2 жыл бұрын

I thoroughly enjoyed The Great War series. It was so interesting I traveled to Europe in the summers of 2018 and 2019 to visit the many war zones. However. TGW was fast paced and only highlighted the many battles. The in depth review today was great. More of this please.

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

thanks, there will be more soon

@jay_kay709 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGreatWar Bring Reciepts, biblography and open sourced historian nerd scrutiny... fakes go silent quickly. knowign aint endorsement.

@sacredxgeometry Жыл бұрын

The mere fact that you pronounce all their names properly in their own language proves that this is the best channel on this topic to me.

@Carolinian4372 Жыл бұрын

My Great Grandfather was wounded fighting on the western front in WWI. RIP George Patrick Coppedge 1894-1988 ✝️

@davem5308 Жыл бұрын

What branch was he serving in?

@samarkand1585 2 жыл бұрын

Awesome, would love to get one like that for the spring 1918 German offensives too

@charleskobold115 2 жыл бұрын

They failed to break the deadlock but the British army did hone their tactics to the point that on the offensive they were no longer suffering a ridiculous ratio of casualties compared to the Germans in defense, which differed greatly from 1915 and 1916. A serious improvement in artillery (both quality and coordination) was one of the main reasons. I think at 3rd Ypres the casualties were roughly 5:4 in favor of the Germans, which they certainly could not sustain. It was a serious step in the right direction.

@FuzzYSrb Жыл бұрын

History should be taught this way in schools! I enjoy every single second of the video! Great content, as expected!

@Aryathehound Жыл бұрын

Thank you for sharing old beautiful history film!

@normanthedoorman205 2 жыл бұрын

Extremely high quality video, best history on youtube

@somewhereelse000 9 ай бұрын

My grandfather fought in the 15th Btn. A.I.F. at Bullecourt! He was captured when his section ran out of ammunition after being cut off by the Germans, just as you stated. Thank you so much for this video, as it illustrates his war diary.

@ianjay4596 2 жыл бұрын

I love these vids. Keep it up!!

@ernieengineer3462 Жыл бұрын

Great video. Thanks for posting.

@akramgimmini8165 2 жыл бұрын

Love this Channel! WW1 is one of my personal Favorite Themes in History

@omarreyes5023 2 жыл бұрын

This was a great video, thank you

@mnpd3 Жыл бұрын

I once wondered the purpose of the pair of studs on the side of the German helmet. I found out decades ago while touring a war museum.... those studs mate to a bulletproof plate that fits to the front of the helmet... nice for peering over the top of the trench.

@majorianus8055 Жыл бұрын

Thanks for keeping up the videos!

@blueduck9409 Жыл бұрын

Excellent video! I enjoyed it. Thank you!

@OneofInfinity. 2 жыл бұрын

The 120k + French casualties paid the price of inability to adapt at the front, a hard lesson for their loved ones.

@ledoynier3694 Жыл бұрын

a hard lesson for military command.. a tragedy for their loved ones.

@keithyork7691 2 жыл бұрын

You mentioned the Battle of Bullicourt. the were two battles fought at that time he first in April by the 4th Aust. Div, which you cover...the second battle was in May and fought by the 2nd Aust Div. It too was a very bloody affair but Bullicourt was taken, and remain in Allied hands until lost during the German Spring Offensive in March 1918. during those two battles the AIF lost 10,000 casualties. Australian troop again fought in the area on 29 Sept 1918 as the Australian Army Corpes including 2 US div(under Australian command).

@Ashtoni001 2 жыл бұрын

Just discovered your superb channel in the last week. I’m finding the post war Central and Eastern European most interesting. Thank you.

@TheHololo1234 Жыл бұрын

I just watched the movie on Netflix 'All quiet on the western front' Went on a WW1 history tour on KZfaq. Glad I found this channel. This war was insane.

@Corristo89 2 жыл бұрын

How often have these "battles to win the war" ever worked? Yes, eventually a battle will become the last battle, but I can't really think of any which had the humble goal of ending an entire war in one fell swoop. The result is always the same: Thousands of dead, an embarrassed high command, morale in the gutter and valuable equipment lost. The Germans understood that they were most likely not going to go on the offensive again like in 1914, but they were masters of defense and dug in, essentially forcing the Entente to go on the offensive and attack them from weaker positions.

@joeyjohnson4826 2 жыл бұрын

I suppose they figured if they could blow a hole in the line big enough they could get to the enemy's flank and rear which would put them in a check position. Now you can either destroy the enemy's army or the enemy will sue for peace. That's what they were hoping for. 😁

@joeya6795 Жыл бұрын

Winning enough battles will win the war, but only if you're annihilating troops with each win.

@joeyjohnson4826 Жыл бұрын

@@joeya6795 there is always the hope that one striking blow will in the war. In the 19th and 20th century early 20th century warfare you hear this. It is more of a hope than anything. But had they been able to spearhead the line and turn the enemy's flank it would have put the Germans in perilous position. Unfortunately, the insane charging into machine gun fire never worked out much for them. 🤷‍♂️

@ommsterlitz1805 Жыл бұрын

It only worked for Napoleon but he is on an other league of Genius among geniuses

@joeyjohnson4826 Жыл бұрын

@@ommsterlitz1805 if he was such a genius he would have been able to adapt as his enemy learned his own tactics and used them against him. He was not able to find a new bag of tricks. And Wellington knew him better than he knew himself he ended him 😁

@jayfelsberg1931 2 жыл бұрын

The Lewis gun was a game changer in many ways. The British finally had mobile firepower to attack German Maims. And, they were finally realizing Mills bombs were better that bayonets in trench warfare. The Germans learned this much sooner, as their operation in the Argonne in 1915-16 showed.

@alganhar1 2 жыл бұрын

The British had learned it, the problem was not the lesson but production of the equipment. People forget that the British were not only supplying their troops already in place but rapidly expanding their army in the first 2 years of the war. It took time to set up all the various factory lines to build the Lewis guns and produce the grenades in the truly staggering quantities required.

@tomt373 Жыл бұрын

The real "game changer" was the tank, as initiated by Winston Churchill, the "First Lord of the Admiralty", not the typical Army type, bound by their limited training and resources. The best the Lewis gun could do was support the tanks as they advanced through the German trenches from German counter-attacks.

@markprange2430 Жыл бұрын

Maims?

@rebekahlikesmusic2723 Жыл бұрын

Really interesting 💯 Great video, well done

@Zygmunt-Zen Жыл бұрын

Just discovered this channel. Great episode! (Subscribed!)

@yoda5565 2 жыл бұрын

"In battle, the enemy gets a vote". Well put.

@crazygrainger2006 2 жыл бұрын

16:35 - The battalion Jesse mentions (16th Battalion, AIF) is from Perth, Western Australia. I have seen the Drake-Brockman name appear all over the place.

@alexamerling79 2 жыл бұрын

Great stuff like always!

@micahistory 2 жыл бұрын

Wow this was a throwback I wasn't expected

@DraftTheHippies 2 жыл бұрын

“There is only 1 way this war ends, last man standing”

@MrChaostheorie13 2 жыл бұрын

You have no idea how happy I am to see the First World War on this channel again and that's saying something, considering the terrible mess that it was

@adambrorson1751 Жыл бұрын

The intros to your intros are fantastic, they're great man, chefs kiss!

@Rohilla313 2 жыл бұрын

Excellent presentation!

@leeetchells609 Жыл бұрын

My great uncle was killed in this action 1917. He is buried in Morley France. He was just 24 years old.

@NoMoreCrumbs 2 жыл бұрын

Never thought I'd be nostalgic for a war. These actions were first covered half a decade ago. Where has all the time gone?

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

yeah, hard to believe we're soon entering the 9th year of production

@Kaiju-Driver Жыл бұрын

I'm amazing contact it was a very enjoyable listen while at my work today keep up the great work

@Jaxxy-tu7wy Жыл бұрын

Just came across you’re channel and its absolutely incredible

@TheGreatWar Жыл бұрын

welcome to the show

@Jaxxy-tu7wy Жыл бұрын

@@TheGreatWar my Great grandad was a medic at Vimy ridge one of the rare English soldiers there. He was gassed in the 3rd ypres and sadly died a few days before armistice day . His name was Thomas Tudor which i have his middle name .

@vksasdgaming9472 2 жыл бұрын

So it was this offensive which during it's early moments claimed lives of these four British servicemen: - Blackadder, Edmund, Captain - Darling, Kevin, Captain - St Barleigh, George Colthurst, Lieutenant - Baldrick, S. Private Notable detail is that Blackadder Family which could trace it's unbroken lineage back to Richard IV of England through Prince Edmund Plantagenet ended on that day.

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

could be yes. Haig definitely moved his drinking cabinet 6 inch closer to Berlin with this one.

@bustersanderson9727 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGreatWar A herculean effort indeed. *Wibble

@taesonslane2513 Жыл бұрын

Looks like only the bankers lending money to both sides were the real winners of WW1. This is what gave birth to the Jewish conspiracy because some of the bankers happened to be Jewish, but obviously that is irrelevant. You would be surprised just how many wars are conspired by bankers who then lend money to both sides.

@thomasandrewo 2 жыл бұрын

"Even if you won, you lost" Modern warfare in a nut shell

@AJ-et3vf Жыл бұрын

awesome video! THank you!

@oliversherman2414 2 жыл бұрын

I love your channel keep up the great stuff!

@johnapple6646 2 жыл бұрын

wow this channel is still around! Thank you for putting out this content

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

not going anywhere 😉

@xalleem8117 Жыл бұрын

Canada's contributions to WWI AND II are often overlooked..from battles in no man's land to D-day they had a lot of success amd contributed to overall victory for the allies in a lot of way....thank you O 🍁!

@wpankey57 Жыл бұрын

Another great video. Thanks!

@leothecat9609 2 жыл бұрын

Yessssss exactly the sort of content we need

@derarbeitslosehaider203 2 жыл бұрын

This is what ive been waiting for♡

@joelmcarthur6074 Жыл бұрын

I also enjoy videos on ww1. My question is why you think the young German comments on his experience being captured was a figment of his imagination. You weren’t there. They were native Canadians in the armed forces and therefore quite likely not a figment of his imagination.

@carthy29 Жыл бұрын

My great grandfather, from waterford joined the british army in aug 1914 and served the whole war in france returning in 1919, i still dont know exactly what battles he fought in etc but he survived and had a few daughters, was hard as nails by all accounts

@mohammedsaysrashid3587 2 жыл бұрын

Most wonderful history coverage

@johnpoole3871 2 жыл бұрын

Man we go from 1870 to 1812 to 1917. Tough era for the French Army for this channel.

@TheGreatWar 2 жыл бұрын

don't worry, they will get their time

@effinjamieTT Жыл бұрын

It became obvious to the germans that this was going to become a war of attrition that they couldn't win, so their plan became hold on to any gains they'd made that would make their position that much stronger at the negotiation table. Hence their bunkers were built deep and built to last, rather than the allies which were only ever viewed as temporary.

@DontKnow-hr5my Жыл бұрын

I honestly think if Germany would have realized how bad the Treaty of Versailles really was, they'd not have signed it but fought further. Even if the allies would have managed to push into Germany itself they'd have bled many more thousands which would have also urged them for a more balanced peace treaty (and may have spared us from Hitler)

@GodKitty677 Жыл бұрын

Without the USA the allies would likely been fought to a stand still and lost. Lost, “defined as having to make a compromise peace with the Germans largely on German terms.” Even with the U.S. entry, the British in late 1917 were seriously contemplating peace feelers from the Germans under which the Germans would have kept all their gains on the Eastern Front and pulled back in the west. If the Americans hadn’t entered the war, the British would have done that deal. The Allies were not only exhausted emotionally and militarily but financially as well. They were in serious financial trouble in early 1917 and they depended heavily on American banks to finance their purchases of war supplies and their ability to get those loans was becoming harder and harder. One of the immediate benefits after the United States enters is that Wilson gets Congress to pass legislation to allow the U.S. government to loan money to the Allies. Those government-to-government loans give them the money to fund their purchases of crucial supplies.

@MN-vz8qm Жыл бұрын

@@DontKnow-hr5my the fact that people call vrrsailles harsh is bonker... It really shows how much nearly a century after the facts people have swallowed goebel propaganda.

@DontKnow-hr5my Жыл бұрын

@@MN-vz8qm It was crazy harsh and that has nothing to do with "Goebbels Propaganda", i recommend you to read more into the impact it actually had. If the french would not have kept pushing for the treaty to be as it was, we may have been spared a second war.

@GodKitty677 Жыл бұрын

@@alskjlskaj Large amounts of money was needed to finance the war-to buy food and munitions for the soldiers, to pay them, and to loan $7 billion to the Allies for their purchasing needs. The GDP in 1917 plus 1918 was $124 billion. Since the dollar then was worth about $20 in 2021, that is about $2.5 trillion in 2021 dollars. The foreign loans stabilized the Allied economies and strengthened their ability to fight and to produce weapons, and thus helped the American war effort. By the end of the war, the United States had become a creditor nation for the first time in its history. But the loans caused no end of diplomatic problems when Washington in the 1920s demanded (and did not get) full repayment. In 1932, 90% was written off because of the Great Depression; after that the issue was largely forgotten and the loans were finally repaid in 1951.

@gamedevyoutube3.030 Жыл бұрын

Great video!!!

@michaelfugate2404 9 ай бұрын

Brilliant breakdown!

@suxcawks 2 жыл бұрын

Sweet, Great War video.

@acosorimaxconto5610 2 жыл бұрын

Verdun was Petain's triumph, not nivelle's. It was Petain who turned the French army around into a winning army. nivelle just inherited it and claimed it as his.

@tibsky1396 2 жыл бұрын

There was Noël de Castelnau who is considered the most underrated General of the Great War.

@bustersanderson9727 2 жыл бұрын

@@tibsky1396 De Castelnau was then promptly fired by the bellend Nivelle but recalled by Foch.

@adamneville1809 Жыл бұрын

Great as always.

@andrewsoboeiro6979 2 ай бұрын

the part about the beer bottles being "unfortunately empty" makes me imagine a weary British officer entering a German trench, excitedly reaching for a beer bottle, finding it empty, and shouting "confound this humbuggery!!"

@SwineBuster 2 жыл бұрын

This channel deserves more subs for its authenticity creativity and accuracy.

@SamuelJamesNary 2 жыл бұрын

The hard part in a lot of this... is that in many ways, the Spring Offensive wasn't a complete failure. It wasn't a complete victory, but neither was it a complete failure. The French and British both gained ground, and with LIGHTER losses than what the French had taken at Verdun in 1916 or what the British had suffered on the Somme. In this, despite the errors noted here, they actually did better when compared to previous operations, all things considered. The problem that hit the Entente, I think is just as with Joffre in 1914 at Champagne, Artois and Champagne in 1915, at the Somme in 1916, a lot of Nivelle's plan was looking for a massed breakthrough. That the German line would break and once through, the line could be rolled up in a way that wouldn't require a massive broad front advance but would have the same results... forcing the Germans out and inflicting heavy loss, particularly when they start to retreat. Something that after the first month of the war would not be truly repeated. The Entente enjoyed localized successes, but these were often on a small scale and due to a particular set of circumstances, which likely couldn't be easily replicated with the technology they had at the time. Yet, Nivelle promised a major breakthrough and didn't get it. His forces advanced, and with lighter casualties than suffered the previous year, and over a wider area of ground than the previous year. In this, it could be counted as a "victory," but it wasn't the breakthrough victory that Nivelle had hoped for and advertised. Which then stressed French morale, which probably wasn't all that high to begin with, to the point where they mutinied against Nivelle's offensive and how they were treated behind the lines.

@poussincasoar7741 Жыл бұрын

Nivelle did indeed have the same strategy than Joffre of breaking through with a massive attack but he believed that the now better equipped and better trained french army would have made what wasn't possible in 1915 possible in 1917. The battles of the Somme and Verdun are often cited as examples of "man grinders" but the losses of the french army during the whole war is a deceasing curve with the highest death toll being the first months of the war and 1915.

@SamuelJamesNary Жыл бұрын

@@poussincasoar7741 - Agreed... it is one of the things that is interesting and shows a lot of progression in how the Entente, and particularly the French, conducted the war. There was a lot of actual improvement on their part... BUT at the same time, the perception of how they were treated really didn't change for the average French soldiers and that fed into what the mutiny came out of after the Nivelle offensive.

@williamkolina3988 2 жыл бұрын

Jesse another great presentation

@johnharrington1800 Жыл бұрын

Masterfully done

@martynpage1794 2 жыл бұрын

I know it’s a counter factual, but what would have happened if the ANZACs had delayed their attack at Bullecourt and waited for better placed artillery support. That may have given the German Army a chance to use it’s reserves at Vimy Ridge and defeat the Canadian Corps and thus undermine trust between the Canadians and ANZACs. The two Corps could not have been used at Amiens in 1918 and Germany could have, if not won not lost in 1918. But it’s a counter factual just a reason to look more sympathetically at Gough’s decision in 1917.