Why the Beechcraft Bonanza is Excellent - The best Family Airplane?

Рет қаралды 134,380

2 жыл бұрын

If you are looking for unmatched craftsmanship, this piston-engine powerhouse is designed and built to be certified in the rugged utility category. With first-class technology, comfort, and world-class quality, this plane is ready for any adventure you might want to embark on. Power comes from a 300hp Continental IO-550 engine, with 3 bladed propellers in front. This variant was introduced in 2006 and is the latest variant since 1947. The price starts at $777,000. Speaking of performance, the maximum climb rate is 1,230 ft/min, with a cruise speed of 196 knots and a 900 nautical mile range. The bonanza can carry six occupants and 70 lbs of baggage. Just like many other light planes, the Bonanza G36 is equipped with the GARMIN G1000 Nxi, which is one of the best out there.
#Beechcraft #BeechcraftBonanza
_________________________________________________
The Team:
Oscar Obierefu (Creative Executive)
Nneji Valentine (Video Editor)
Voiceover by Tomislav Krevzelj
_________________________________________________
You can Support us on Patreon here: / dwaynesaviation
_________________________________________________
To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
_________________________________________________
Our channel is about Aviation.
We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.

Пікірлер: 68

@n3307v 2 жыл бұрын

75 years later and the Bonanza is still an amazing design. Beechcraft got it Right the First Time.

@pirep777 2 жыл бұрын

I think all Bonanza design engineers should be driving cars with no driver side door.

@stillwater1277 Жыл бұрын

Gotm

@mtadc1545 9 ай бұрын

Yeah, it’s ridiculous how it STILL doesn’t have a pilot door.

@n3307v 2 жыл бұрын

The early Bonanzas were not subject to the AD. Only a one-time skin thickness test. Mine has been flying 75 trouble-free years. An amazing design and hard to fly without a smile on your face.

@es330td 6 ай бұрын

My flight instructor was a friend of the family and let me sit left seat in his A36 Bonanza one day. Takeoffs and landings from three different airports. After doing all my time in C172 & C182, best 1.5 hours of flying time I've ever had. I still love that I have that line in my pilot logbook.

@billmastin7007 2 жыл бұрын

I enjoy flying my 1989 B36TC now for 2 years. Great for the 3 hour trip from DFW to AXX and handles the mountain altitude just fine on takeoff. I appreciate the gear over the 210 and my wife likes the convenience of getting in through the cargo doors. Great upgrade from my Tiger.

@bradyoder5899 2 жыл бұрын

What did the insurance company require for the upgrade as far as dual and solo time? Thanks

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

If I had the opportunity to getting into a G36 to fly on a Cross country flight with my family members it would be great

@rodolfocastro3222 2 жыл бұрын

Enjoyed the video! Thank you. Please do one for the Mooney M20J!

@jphoyost 2 жыл бұрын

Impecable video about Bonanza!!! Thanks for being a reliable source of info to make wise decisions when buying a plane!!

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

A lot of A-36 buyers are going turbo alley now so I remember seeing the B36TC model that had more gills for engine cooling

@anthonycyr9657 Жыл бұрын

Just an all around great aircraft, my favorite next to the 182, another textron product..

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

The C195 on some had the cross wind landing gear and I’ve flown the V-35 and loved it and now the ruddervators on alert for spots of corrosion and this is a problem but unfortunately there are companies that can take care of this and the cost is very expensive

@mikentx57 2 жыл бұрын

The Cessna 195 looks like it is right out of 1936. But the Bonanza coming out right after the end the war must have seemed like it was a plane delivered by aliens from outer space. It was far more modern than any non-fighter created during the war. As a reference of how much of a leap this was for Beechcraft. Keep in mind that their single engine plane before the Bonanza was the Staggerwing.

@MTBAviator 2 жыл бұрын

I’m surprised it doesn’t come standard with landing lights in the wingtips. Or have the option for a composite prop.

@timmholzhauer3342 2 жыл бұрын

I can confirm that post 1984 A36 Bonanza’s are the best! ;-))

@truthful3777 2 жыл бұрын

1 would prefer the Cessna 195, the radial sound, sounds Great. What more better view below due to high wing.

@UnusualPilot 2 жыл бұрын

OMG THAT BROWN AND WHITE BONANZA IS OURS lol where did you find that video hahaha N404v

@UnusualPilot 2 жыл бұрын

Well as my family calls it cream and beige color

@paulbrouyere1735 2 жыл бұрын

Can you help me find some building plans for a 1949 twin bonanza? The one Jacques Brel was flying(French-Flemish singer-songwriter)

@pettsnjam 2 жыл бұрын

I love my A36

@user-vi2ue6nf8c 3 ай бұрын

I owned a v-tail. One better be proficient flying one, as it can get away from those not trained and current

@cfinstr 2 жыл бұрын

The early V tail 35’s Bonanzas had a 35 pound slug of lead I it’s nose to help out its “Balance issues.” It seems a better alternative should have been a small fundamental design change. I love how it flies and earned my Commercial License in a K-35. As a purist you have to wonder how it could have been improved, sans 35 pound dead weight in the nose.

@n3307v 2 жыл бұрын

No. My 1947 (D-766) doesn't have a weight in the nose.

@erichboese7209 2 жыл бұрын

@@n3307v correct...the ballast in the nose was to help compensate for aft CG issues in later models when the baggage area was extended.

@anthonycyr9657 Жыл бұрын

A bigger engine..

@evanbarr9270 2 жыл бұрын

Ok so does the straight tail (Debonair ) fly better than the same equipment v tail ?Strictly the 2 smaller planes not the big a-36.

@brentfranklin3557 2 жыл бұрын

I want one

@backcountyrpilot Жыл бұрын

At 4:23 you mention the G1000 display, but show a 530/430 combo. At 4:53 you begin showing the G1000

@Gryphon_19 2 жыл бұрын

This video helped me decide the bonanza is not for me. Thanks for the info

@robh4671 Жыл бұрын

Me too 👍

@Dan_C604 9 ай бұрын

Why? Interested to know

@coniacman 2 жыл бұрын

As a licensed aircraft mechanic, I've worked on many general aviation aircraft. Different brands all have their pros and cons. To me, Beech parts were always way overpriced. Having that non-removable lower engine cowling was a pain in the a$$ too. Of course, all retractable gear planes have their maintenance issues.

@skeleguns10oooooo10 2 жыл бұрын

Baron 58 has similar parts but with 2 engines

@brentfranklin3557 2 жыл бұрын

I would transport any where

@samuelgiesbrecht9450 2 жыл бұрын

8:55 range 716 or 920 nm?

@joesteffe6155 2 жыл бұрын

can the banoza G36 come with Pressure cabins ??

@performancespecialties2756 Жыл бұрын

Navion video?

@arthurbrumagem3844 2 жыл бұрын

I’ll stick to my Piper as I can afford it and parts.

@owencarey2954 2 жыл бұрын

Beechcraft after this video aired: *STONKS*

@skipgetelman3418 2 жыл бұрын

Expensive but you get quality

@TOMVUTHEPIMP 5 ай бұрын

SR22 is the "Doctor killer". Not the Bonanza,

@RealSerie26 2 жыл бұрын

Beautiful airplane. Useful load of 1,076 lbs…for 6 passengers. More like 4 if Americans.

@user-jw5nw4db7m 5 ай бұрын

Could have bought any six place aircraft I wanted and the Cessna 210 Centurion is better. Center of gravity limits Bonanzas, dislike climbing on wing to enter, etc, etc, Could make a whole list of ways Centurion beats Bonanza performance. Bonanzas do have much nicer interior, Cessna could do so much better …

@brentfranklin3557 2 жыл бұрын

Ok I need 2 y’all yell when you send the first one I’ll need to get a license

@BrettsCorner92 10 ай бұрын

I don't know, you would have to Ask Buddy Holly

@stevec6455 2 ай бұрын

I had a 1978 A36. Best airplane I had. But there is no such thing as a best family small airplane. Instead take your family on a scheduled airline. It is much safer and more likely to not kill your family.

@waynesilva3129 2 жыл бұрын

The beech is the pitty of single engine pistons. Everything else is just basic transportation.

@normanmarino7285 2 жыл бұрын

@rocket862 2 жыл бұрын

Fun video,but the narrator sounds like like a joke.

@flyboykfpr Жыл бұрын

The Beech is a fine airplane, the Cadillac of planes, but if you stall in one it is almost impossible to recover unless you have over 5 k altitude.

@robh4671 Жыл бұрын

Are you serious???

@smark1180 10 ай бұрын

Nonsense.

@danmoriarty1278 Жыл бұрын

That is one highly irritating voice!

@sailboatbob3969 2 жыл бұрын

are they out of their fucking minds????????? $800,000 for a single engine piston plane? you can buy a lot of airline tickets just for the selling price. never mind the yearly costs

@mikentx57 2 жыл бұрын

Beech planes were always more expensive. They have been basically the ‘Mercedes-Benz’ of of aircraft. Also what is making them so expensive and Cessna’s too is that they are owned by the same company, Textron. It very much is a monopoly at work here.

@williamrmcintosh4343 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah but airline tickets don't have v-tails

@user-xw3sw8gg3y 5 ай бұрын

It's not for everyone...

@HEMIdouglas 2 жыл бұрын

This design should be decommissioned and grounded by the FAA as having too many accidents.

@tropicthndr 2 жыл бұрын

Does everybody who just wants to believe, have their heads in the sand. See a dreamy picture and it’s all heaven. Better go to Katherynreport get your head out of your butt and look at how many Continental engine failures have occurred in this plane and the Cirrus just lately, with the same garbage power plant. Recently N67CH, N1HH, N5093C, N654HR, only to name a few. There’s more but those are just dumb pilots flying Bonanza’s that shouldn’t be pilots.

@williamrmcintosh4343 2 жыл бұрын

The only good troll...

@jeremykemp3782 11 ай бұрын

but passed all their exams, so they cannot be that dumb

@flyinbry 2 жыл бұрын

Bonanza is a dog. It’s not really an excellent plane.

@erichboese7209 2 жыл бұрын

A "dog" by what standards? Compared to an F16...sure. Compared to other aircraft in the same category/class...classifying it as a "dog" is more than a little disingenuous. Does it meet any/all mission profiles....NO. No such airplane exists.