The HMS Victory didn’t sink, it’s in Portsmouth drydock
@spooky9469 Жыл бұрын
ive heard that the one in the drydock is not the one that fought
@wyvern4248 Жыл бұрын
@@spooky9469 it is the one that fought There was an HMS Victory that sank in 1737, they're two different ships with the same name
@thedictationofallah Жыл бұрын
@@spooky9469 The one in drydock is the same ship that fought in 6-7 battles and nearly at all times was the flagship. Same ship who knocked out the french flagship at trafalgar out of action, same ship that scared away spanish 1st rate principe de austurias out of battle at capte st. vincent, same ship that sunk a boat at hyaeres islands, same ship that captured a frigate Embuscade, same ship that proved to be so legendary
@ebglqxcqwwwww3241 Жыл бұрын
Also it took 7 years to build her not 3, uploader clearly had no idea what he was talking about
@just_a_person692 Жыл бұрын
@@wyvern4248 There were six different HMS Victory's with Nelsons famous flagship at Portsmouth being the sixth. An earlier HMS Victory sank in the opening to the English Channel in 1744.
@jacobpeacock1026 Жыл бұрын
You didn't do much research did you
@tanjianyumoe5700 Жыл бұрын
He was talking abt a different HMS Victory
@ebglqxcqwwwww3241 Жыл бұрын
True
@Worship_Universe6 ай бұрын
The ENTIRE video is AI generated. No human efforts was involved. when will people understand most youtube shorts werent made or even uploaded by people? KZfaq IS 90% BOTS.
@Manwholikestrains Жыл бұрын
Him: the hms victory may have sunk Portsmouth drydock: am I a Fukin joke to you mate
@rafaelacielo3948 Жыл бұрын
He's talking about the 1737 hms victory not nelson's hms victory
@rileyblackwood7101 Жыл бұрын
ive been on the victory
@Upgraded_Titan_Speakerman204411 ай бұрын
@@rileyblackwood7101someone said hes refering to the 1737 hms victory not the one thats still around
@pickle44227 ай бұрын
@@Upgraded_Titan_Speakerman2044that’s the same bloody ship
@pickle44227 ай бұрын
@@rafaelacielo3948same ship
@No-dy3zk Жыл бұрын
I’m sorry which victory are we talking about? At first I thought you were talking about Nelson’s victory. Then you show a cut out image of a ship type that existed way before victory.
@West_Coast_Gang Жыл бұрын
1737
@No-dy3zk Жыл бұрын
@@West_Coast_Gang There was another victory before that one I heard about after I made the comment.
@Noreik395 Жыл бұрын
Theres been a lot of confusion over this video unfortunately due to the uploader not specifilying which hms victory was the subject of this video, due to this im not even sure if the creator knows which he is discussing. Hms victory in portsmouth was launched 1765 and saw much service through her career all the way up to around 1814 give or take. She did not sink, and yes she is genuin, the one refered to that dunk was the victory that was before her, she was made of untreated timber and due to vanity of the designer wanting to show off his prowess was given a very high centre of mass due to her having a 4 floor high stern gallery, she was a terrible sailor and very unstable and this lead to her being toppled and sunk in a storm.
@robertmaddox35155 күн бұрын
This video and its title is also a contradiction! 🤦🏻♂️
@mosquito-b4n2 ай бұрын
the Victory from 1765 never sunk, it was reserved and she became museum at Portsmouth, there is, actually, another shio with the name Victory that is sunk and that victory was found in 2008 in English Channel, so this video is 50/50 right
@hardalarboard8876 Жыл бұрын
She never sunk..
@adolfshitler Жыл бұрын
There have been a few HMS Victory's. This video is talking about the one that sank in 1737. Although it does show images of Nelson's flag ship at times. Misleading to say the least.
@hardalarboard8876 Жыл бұрын
@@adolfshitler Indeed.
@priorhen810511 ай бұрын
Different victory
@hardalarboard887611 ай бұрын
@@priorhen8105 Read the above.
@XavierAway Жыл бұрын
you could have specified which HMS Victory you are talking about... there are 6 of them 🤦
@rexquite5547 Жыл бұрын
Bruh no..... it didn't sink. And was one of the best ships made of it's time
@rafaelacielo3948 Жыл бұрын
He's talking about a different HMS victory the one Nelson's was named after
@priorhen810511 ай бұрын
Not the same ik very misleading but if you've been in hms victory in Portsmouth that layout in the video is different
@BrokenIET8 ай бұрын
@@priorhen8105Yeah, because he‘s lazy and didn’t do research. The diagram isn’t from any of the HMS Victories (Victorys?), its from the Mary Rose, which did sink, though not as a result of untreated timbers. It was raised and can be seen at Portsmouth historic Dockyard along with Victory. That being said, non of the 6 Royal Navy ships named Victory sank as a result of untreated timbers.
@priorhen81058 ай бұрын
@@BrokenIETaye didn't the one he is supposed to be talking about sink off the channel islands in a storm or something
@BrokenIET8 ай бұрын
@@priorhen8105 Yeah, it did.
@aliasunknown7476 Жыл бұрын
That's inaccurate regarding her speed. If Victory managed to achieve 12knots, she'd be unable to set all her sails or risk breaking and tearing the smaller ones. More sail does not necessarily mean more speed. The lighter the wind, the more sails required to harness the wind. Strong wind only requires the main sails to harness the power. Victory never sunk either.
@rafaelacielo3948 Жыл бұрын
He's talking about the 1772 victory not Nelson's victory but he shows nelson's victory in the video
@West_Coast_Gang Жыл бұрын
@@rafaelacielo3948 no, the 1737 one
@rafaelacielo3948 Жыл бұрын
@@West_Coast_Gang oh that one
@sandordula52076 ай бұрын
I have been onboard. One of my most precious memory ever. She is not sunken.
@filster1934 Жыл бұрын
Anyone notice the ensign at the end?
@johnnyhollis9977 Жыл бұрын
That is a shot of the USS Constitution! I think this whole clip is a mash up!
@anna-mariemerchant907710 ай бұрын
No ensign flying that I saw.
@helenbach18708 ай бұрын
Stars and Stripes at the end of video.
@gunsdonovan91836 ай бұрын
When Americans do British history, what a joke.
@IJN_Kongo15 күн бұрын
My man was trying to figure out how the fak did victiry fight at trafalgar if it was sunken: what
@GardenFootCreature Жыл бұрын
False info
@tanjianyumoe5700 Жыл бұрын
He was talking about a different HMS Victory
@GardenFootCreature Жыл бұрын
@@tanjianyumoe5700 but the victory that sunk could not achieve 12 knots right?
@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here11 ай бұрын
@@GardenFootCreatureyou are correct, it most likely wouldn’t have. The creator of this video probably confused the two and mushed the differing ships into one…
@Upgraded_Titan_Speakerman204411 ай бұрын
@@GardenFootCreaturehe may have been refering to an older one
@electrominded8372Ай бұрын
What is it with KZfaq Shorts makers where they are totally void of reality?
@SavageMonkeyJizzАй бұрын
Good ole captain Nelson
@ag0437Ай бұрын
This is misleading. HMS Victory is commonly understood to be Nelson's flagship that fought at Trafalgar and now at Portsmouth Royal Docks. There was an earlier ship of the same name that sank, but the most famous Victory is a museum piece and also, I believe, a commissioned (albeit unused) ship of the Royal Navy.
@RulgertGhostalker22 күн бұрын
I would book a cruise on a recreation built in relatively thin wood, with glass composite reinforcement, and a lead keel......well if I had any money I would; I am so poor, a cruise ship vacation is entirely beyond me.
@jamesleyda3652 ай бұрын
For being a little colonial power back in the day the US built some damn fine boats and ships.....and yes I know the HMS Victory is British, not American! I like them wooden cuties but love me a Iowa class Battleship💪🏴☠️
@MsCaleb79Ай бұрын
First it sank and then it came up again
@MayorMcheese12Ай бұрын
Id be more interested in going to a sink sight of this thing over the titanic
@RegisTraiterАй бұрын
What alternate reality was this video made in..?
@gjc21ful9 күн бұрын
I think he's confused mary rose with victory. A famous ship that did sink that is at portsmouth. Also the internal picture is of a tudor ship
@spymanlol356912 күн бұрын
britain had alot of HMS Victory, the Nelson HMS Victory is on Portsmouth drydock
@creativeamerican8811 Жыл бұрын
This video is nonsense. HMS Victory was never sunk. It is still afloat. Its frame was given 3 years to season rather than just one due to the Seven years war. This video really annoyed me.
@West_Coast_Gang Жыл бұрын
Hms victory (1737) sank
@paulfaruga11 ай бұрын
@@West_Coast_Gang Why dont you go down to Portsmouth and take the tour of the ship. By using the Term The HMS Victory the producer of this video is clearly referring to this ship. If he is not then he should make it clear.
@West_Coast_Gang7 ай бұрын
@@paulfaruga excuse me, Paul, but there were 6 HMS Victories
@michaelamos46512 ай бұрын
This is the Internet at its absolute worst. HMS Victory never sank she still sits in Portsmouth dry Dock. Bunkum
@user-wz3ts6ez2h2 ай бұрын
The HMS victory he is talking about is the 3rd ship to carry the name. It sank in 1744. 14 years later, in 1758, another ship was ordered, also called HMS victory. This 4th one is the one in Porthsmith. None of the images he shows are of the ship he is talking about. It is very misleading
@zaranski200927 күн бұрын
Imagine using knots in 2024
@andydporter513615 күн бұрын
What do you mean? Knots is still the standard unit of measurement of nautical speed. It's the stand unit of speed measurement in aviation, too.
@user-hv8wv1rz6m7 ай бұрын
She did not sink, she is still around today
@EllisJohnstone6 ай бұрын
There was one before Nelson’s HMS Victory
@MartinPotter-lj8zsАй бұрын
She didn't sink, actually her timbers were seasoned more than most as she laid covered during the delay in the need to complete her. Think your AI has the wrong ship.
@user-cb9je6oj7uКүн бұрын
For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. (Romans 10:13) Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. (Isaiah 55:7) When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. (Mark 2:17)
@jeffreyrobinson3555 Жыл бұрын
The cutaway is a sixteenth century ship and not victory. Right now victory is in Portsmouth harbor and never sank Was fleet flagship for years
@West_Coast_Gang7 ай бұрын
Wrong Victory The royal navy likes reusing named
@jeffreyrobinson35556 ай бұрын
Was just about to post that, As I recall there was a first or second rate the did sink around the napoleonic war that did sink from rotten timber when just a few years old
@bestbehaveАй бұрын
Well this is unclear. Nelson's Victory didn't sink, but her predecessor did in 1744. Nelson's flagship was floated out at Chatham in 1765
@davidjamesgillespie40026 күн бұрын
Miss information the HMS Victory still is in dock and still part of the naval fleet as today this year period. Hell just google it up the service history .gee's
@garywootton13228 күн бұрын
Think you mean Mary Rose as the victory is in pompey dockyard and still commisend .
@PappaFury13 күн бұрын
Aaaaaah think you may have the wrong victory there
@banditens90s4 ай бұрын
40 Lashes for this ”creator”. Generally there needs to be a lot more lashes for a lot more ”creators”. If there were, there wouldn’t be as much shit like this produced. Because of the lashes. 40 of them.
@SofiaGaming0064 ай бұрын
This is a different HMS Victory, there were 6 of them and the one in Portsmouth is the 6th one
@attewoode26 күн бұрын
1 - victory didn’t sink. 2 - that cross section is not victory. It looks like an Elizabethan race-built galleon.
@TBFI_BotswanaАй бұрын
Your AI generated video shows is flying the Stars & Stripes 🤔😂
@jinks9088 ай бұрын
Crazy how quickly I go from "Oh, this looks interesting" straight to clicking **Don't Recommend This Channel**
@erichammond9308Ай бұрын
Really? No ship named HMS Victory ever sank due to unseasoned timbers being used. One was wrecked in a storm after hitting rocks, one was burnt by accident, and the others were scrapped after service. In fact, the current HMS Victory owes her long service to the fact that she sat for an extra year or so on the stocks after completing due to lack of need for another 1st rate ship at the time, which allowed for additional seasoning/drying of her timbers.
@SpaceDude7567Ай бұрын
I literally boarded on HMS victory itself yesterday in Portsmouth and it is the original one
@ITALY7894 ай бұрын
She never sunk. She was only in one battle at the battle of tralger in the 1800’s and was never used again.The one ur talking about was from 1737
@themadmechanic1964 Жыл бұрын
i think they have mixed up with the Mary Rose
@West_Coast_Gang Жыл бұрын
No, hms victory (1737) sunk
@siredwardpellew5929Ай бұрын
My guy is talking about HMS Victory of 1744, but it wasnt bad timbers that sunk her is was the fact that the ship was built to short and narrow whilst being built too high, she sailed into a storm after a battle and sank
@JerseyAirАй бұрын
Wdym it sank its still here to this day 😅
@robertphillips51812 ай бұрын
this is deffo a chat gbt thing
@chrissouthgate455419 күн бұрын
Is he mixing up Victory & Mary Rose?
@tay1903Ай бұрын
There was 2 hms victory the first one disappeared in 1744 due to it sinking and was washing up on the channel islands the HMS victory we know was nelson flagship and current sits in drydock
@pvp_plays33777 ай бұрын
Just imagine duke of kent built
@edwardpellew98529 ай бұрын
This video is the reason why deleting dislike button was a bad idea.
@allmodcons610 ай бұрын
she weighed around 3500 tons fully loaded so how the fuck is she supposed to be made from 12000 tons of oak?
@nahmend698726 күн бұрын
Do Botafogo ship next
@will-i-am-not14 күн бұрын
First state which HMS Victory, and at keast show pictures of such, as you have taken so many different ships, oh dear
@Alexandros.Mograine2 ай бұрын
Bro i have literally been inside this ship😂it didnt sink.
@Arrgh56514 күн бұрын
If the HMS victory sunk then how was I with it in Portsmouth get your facts right
@goofiegoofball28 күн бұрын
Best example of misinformation
@gravyboat237015 күн бұрын
I've been on it and it wasn't under the water
@flipperpitstudio6 ай бұрын
The HMS Victory NEVER sank! wtf?
@Tank333815 ай бұрын
Bruh she’s not even in the water.
@thatfellafrazer12 күн бұрын
Bro is talking out of his arse
@peeweemax1002 ай бұрын
How does one treated wood ?
@ViertzRaszenskiАй бұрын
People saying French Navy never had strong 118c ships, need to watch this: -Le Friedland -Trocadéro -Souverain -L'Orient -L'Océan -L'invincible -Impérial -Royal Louis -Commerce De Marseille -La Ville De Paris And many others that are probably unknow or not listed.
@Cobber.5 ай бұрын
AI is still clueless 👍
@ErectkyleDysfunction6 ай бұрын
HMS Victory NEVER used all her sails for speed. Sailing Large (which is what the practice is called) was never meant for maintaining speed. In fact if it got too windy the crew would have to remove some of them from getting torn up.
@Lumberzach19834 күн бұрын
This vid needs to sink
@gunsdonovan91836 ай бұрын
The cut away isnt HMS Victory either, whem Americans do British history, go home.....
@JoeS-bu3vi8 ай бұрын
It hasn’t sunken
@user-bw9pr2ho5i3 ай бұрын
Wait wait what about hms Prince or hms Queen Elizabeth or hms echo
@murphyxxxx8699 ай бұрын
Unfortunately KZfaq is not showing how many dislike this video got
@viruschoccymilkgang10 ай бұрын
I believe that the Victory he’s talking about did sink. Look at the Victory from 1737 on Wikipedia. It’s called “The Loss of the Victory”.
@daniel-leejones83967 ай бұрын
Sunk!?!
@Pink.andahalf2 ай бұрын
Is this one of those intentionally wrong AI videos that try to farm engagement?
@johnny-p Жыл бұрын
Wrong, in so many ways.
@tanjianyumoe5700 Жыл бұрын
He was talking abt the different HMS Victory
@tomslade3365Ай бұрын
What I love the inter nett full of non facts and trash
@oliverqadarihogg45946 ай бұрын
The HMS Victory never sunk you donut
@oliverqadarihogg45946 ай бұрын
I literally walked along the decks and stepped on the place where Lord Nelson was killed on the ship man
@RelaxedPixel5 ай бұрын
@@oliverqadarihogg4594different victory
@robertmaddox35155 күн бұрын
This video and its title is a contradiction! 🤦🏻♂️
@bluegek6 ай бұрын
The Victory was still commissioned up until the early 1900s (i think)
@RelaxedPixel5 ай бұрын
The Victory he is saying did sink in 1737
@garfielf_- Жыл бұрын
Got destroyed In pirates of the Caribbean in that movie where they stab Davy Jones heart I forgot the name of it
@rafaelacielo3948 Жыл бұрын
Thats the fictional hms endeavour
@cbships5550 Жыл бұрын
12000 tons of timber. that’s more than big heavy cruisers in ww2 i’m sorry what
@user-nh9ii5ru4r5 ай бұрын
HMS victory did not sink its in Portsmouth dockyard
@RelaxedPixel5 ай бұрын
Different HMS Victory, the one hes refering to is from the 1737 which sank
@chuckwieser7622 Жыл бұрын
Man your putting out bad info! I appreciate your Enthusiasm for history and age of sale ships, but you have 2 HMS victories conflated. Fixture video, or I'll have to report it!
@DARisse-ji1yw2 ай бұрын
Sunk ???
@tylerresler69955 ай бұрын
Lmao what
@orcbuster70609 ай бұрын
The victory didn’t sink she is sitting in Portsmouth
@West_Coast_Gang7 ай бұрын
She sank in 1737
@orcbuster70607 ай бұрын
@@West_Coast_Gang the Hms victory lord Nelsons flagship is sitting in Portsmouth
@manicmechanic4489 ай бұрын
Dude. Wood rots. A shocker, I know.
@janbotha571Ай бұрын
Where did this guy study history. Victory did not sink. Or is he from an ulternate universe where the Victory sank. 😂
@paulstreesofwalthamabbey20076 ай бұрын
😂 utter bollocks!
@marcariotto1709Ай бұрын
70k foot boards! HOLY SHITE MAN! Whered they get boards that long?
@KeithJohnson.Ай бұрын
What in the name of AI nonsense is this all about?!! Victory didn’t sink, I was onboard her recently lol 😂
@AverageAlien9 ай бұрын
How do we get Mary Rose and Victory so confused 😂😂😂😂😂
@Tony2438 Жыл бұрын
Are you talking about 1744 Victory trying to be smart as far as I know a storm and a navigational error was the cause the 1744 couldn't do 12 knots? What are you talking about? 1765 Victory could do 12 knots and never sink
@Lad7575 ай бұрын
I didn’t sink you need to research your history😊
@RelaxedPixel5 ай бұрын
I think you do as there was a HMS Victory in early 1700s that sank, not the one Nelson was on
@Lad7575 ай бұрын
I was talking about HMS victory Nelson built
@RelaxedPixel5 ай бұрын
@@Lad757 ok well thats not the one in the video that hes talking about
@Lad7575 ай бұрын
Okay sorry mate, I didn’t know
@Datsunz-fr2nw11 күн бұрын
Ai generated video
@SailorGerry2 ай бұрын
Very poor YT short; a waste of my time.
@thegooddonut1 Жыл бұрын
HMS Victory literally hasnt sunk its in London irl rn
@adolfshitler Жыл бұрын
The first HMS Victory did sink in 1737. The second more famous ship "Nelson's flag ship" is actually alive and well, living in the naval dockyards at Portsmouth
@shelbyseelbach9568Ай бұрын
Don't recommend channel.
@mac70406 ай бұрын
Another useless content maker is too lazy to give proper information.
@RelaxedPixel5 ай бұрын
I do agree some information was done properly but the sinking part was true