Elle van Veelen cous cous

1776

Lol, awwww at least you care to learn, I didn’t know what it was either and I’m an American 😅

isn't it weird that Rupert Murdoch owns The new york times that hates Trump and also owns Fox news that likes him ??? think abou that guys

Interesting suggestion

@@lukerinderknecht2982 I gotta say, I like this idea a lot. The only reason Iowa and other small States should be before larger States is so that candidates actually care and go out to smaller populations, if Iowa, NH, SC and NV didn't go first no candidate would go out to their state for their measly 3-5 delegates

Bernie was leading... then all of a sudden they had to stop sending out messages, now they are coming back saying maybe Mayor Pete is slightly ahead... are the establishment democrats cheating Bernie again?

@@ohoyohummered okay Bernie bro there's a delayed result in Iowa right now you don't know that, wait till tmo

@@BrustinNikolai .. I was watching live. Before the delay, Bernie was ahead, then they went behind doors and started giving Ami and Biden's people time to realign. then slow trickles of Pete leading started leaking. I am also not a Bro, 55year old Grandma here.

Of course not! That’s why Iowa doesn’t matter now lol so obvious

In all fairness, it's *still* unclear who the frontrunner is. Bernie and Buttigieg are nearly tied. They also likely made this video weeks in advance.

Hannibal Ben Barca Except we aren’t a democracy, but a Constitutional Republic, wherein we elect representatives to represent us, however in the American context of republicanism each individual state is a “representative” of the people within its borders. The United **States** of America is one country comprised of 50 semi-sovereign states each with its own unique perspectives, values, economy, and history. The Founding Fathers saw individual US states each individually which it’s own civil governments and electing representatives and electors to represent their own semi-sovereign state within our Union at the federal level. The United States of America was **never** meant to be a democracy.

Noob

@@DoveofHope2 ??? You know Republic (RES·PUBLICA the thing that is public) or Democracy (Δημοκρατία demos+kratos the people ruling) really means effectively the same, it merely depends on if you prefer Latin or Greek.

ᴅᴇᴀʀ ᴍʀ. ɪꜱᴀɪᴀʜ ᴅᴇʀɪɴɢᴇʀ; There are actually a few fundamental differences between the two in the American context historically going all the way back to the federalist papers, in which James Madison specifically lays out the differences between democracy and republic (or at the very least defined them clearly when using those terms in the American context going forward): According to Madison, “The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic, are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater the number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended.” In short, for Madison, democracy meant direct democracy, and republic meant representative government. Thus, by the end of the 18th century both the idea and the practice of democracy had been profoundly transformed. Political theorists and statesmen now recognized what the Levelers had seen earlier, that the nondemocratic practice of representation could be used to make democracy practicable in the large nation-states of the modern era. Representation, in other words, was the solution to the ancient dilemma between enhancing the ability of political associations to deal with large-scale problems and preserving the opportunity of citizens to participate in government. To some of those steeped in the older tradition, the union of representation and democracy seemed a marvelous and epochal invention. In the early 19th century the French author Destutt de Tracy, the inventor of the term idéologie (“ideology”), insisted that representation had rendered obsolete the doctrines of both Montesquieu and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, both of whom had denied that representative governments could be genuinely democratic (see below Montesquieu and Rousseau). “Representation, or representative government,” he wrote, “may be considered as a new invention, unknown in Montesquieu’s time.…**Representative democracy… (republicanism) is democracy rendered practicable for a long time and over a great extent of territory.” In 1820 the English philosopher James Mill proclaimed** “the system of representation” to be “the grand discovery of modern times” in which “the solution of all the difficulties, both speculative and practical, will perhaps be found.” One generation later Mill’s son, the philosopher John Stuart Mill, concluded in his Considerations on Representative Government (1861) that “the ideal type of a perfect government” would be both democratic and representative. Foreshadowing developments that would take place in the 20th century, the dēmos of Mill’s representative democracy included women.

@@DoveofHope2 Well you are a stone age Constitutional Republic then.... hope you are happy now with your preferred term...

Not you. Him. You just can't see it. Yet.

@@rosalindganymede7883 name one politician who this dosent apply

@@rosalindganymede7883 Why is that? Above all other choices do you think Bernie would not put America first? This is a guy that has stayed consistent in his Ideals since he has been a public figure. Why would he put himself first now? What is his scheme? Please elaborate for us.

@@StonedPriest No one has a good answer for that. I asked myself why Bernie, now I ask myself, why not?

Exactly. We learning today

SARAH Connors inform yourself troll

Bernie's MFA was already killed in the House by Ds. It costs too much, takes too long. Trillions in tax, thousands from Americans, with the promise if being cheaper than private insurance. Its a bandaid that shifts the burden to tax payers. I prefer Yang's Capitation Single-payer system more. Universal Healthcare for free, so nobody needs insurance.

@@TheMoBrother yeah it was killed by corporate Dems who were payed by the healthcare industry

SARAH Connors Judging by how Warren has been acting the past few weeks, she isnt president material

I think it’s honestly momentum and press coverage. Also, it’s a bit of a swing state. If you can do well in Iowa and NH you’re taken seriously and get more coverage (unless you’re Bernie. Then they don’t know the results).

@SARAH Connors Lol I htink this is the most bizarre and laughable argument I have read in a long time... Dont worry about Bernies balls, I dont think they will be in a high prominence during his term.

@SARAH Connors Oh ok, ur a troll... well I actually fell for that? lol

@SARAH Connors this is the argument that lost Hillary 2016

I like Yang a lot. I really do. Especially after seeing him on Rogan. But he won't win and wont shock anyone. Especially not without the DNC behind him. Sucks cus I like him a lot.

Your English is fine. Here’s a guide: www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/policy-2020/climate-change/nuclear-power/

X2

Andrew yang does NOT support Medicare for all, his healthcare plan is utter garbage and worse than bidens

Whoever wins Iowa almost always wins the nomination

You must be from Iowa. Not even you are quite sure what you're doing.

Why because you shove Ethanol in our throats

@@johndavis8669 no because we love reminding people that we're first

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” If you’re gonna quote that, at least also quote what your god emperor said