THEY are free masonic "Saints!" Stick to the actual Saints! St. Steven, Oro pro nobis DEO 🌹

Those Popes were canonized because they want you to believe in VII It is not possible that they could be canonized because of their disobedience To Heaven’s request What Price do these Pope pay for their continued disobedience ? Malachi Martin asked JP II why he did not do as Our Lady Requested JP II answered because we ( The Popes ) have lost sanctifying Grace. The truth is the N.O. Mass is not valid It can’t be It was written by 6 Protestants headed by a Mason Their goal was to Protestantize the Catholic Church They have succeeded Instead of the Solemn dignity of the Latin Mass The Mass of our Saints and Martyrs We now have Joking and Juggling Priests Dancing Nuns Disco strobes lights Blaring music All done to destroy The Holy Catholic Church We are on the verge of Bergoglio changing the laws on contraception And also declaring same sex relationships as valid They have emptied the Church of its divine content and Filled it with filth. I have no doubt the third secret talks about this. Fr. Gruner said the third secret must be released to the laity Before the consecration can be done Makes sense You want to know what it is you are praying for. We know it will be done even tho it will be done late Our Lady assures us of her victory. Surely there are chastisements that will come because of all this evil.

Several? Not just John Paul ll?

@@loreforone924 from John 23rd on

1960 is as important to world and Church history as 1884 with the vision of Pope Leo XIII. This willful rejection of the commands of Heaven unleashed the diabolic disorientation upon the world and the Church. 1960 is the bright line when the systemic apostasy entered in and the fruit of the Council that followed.

A good advice. Thanks, Sam. God bless you, and a Happy New Year to you.

Its obvious what the Third Secret is by now. A nullification of everything happening since 1960 (Post-Conciliar Church). We should focus more on our Spiritual lives.

Read the following mesage in reverse and follow the trace: ćivodivdeM madA rohtua yb seires "ćon aljovaĐ" daeR

It's okay to disobey God if you're highly placed clergy, but God help you if you disobey one of them when they order you to glorify sin.

You can’t simply “forget about it” as it’s prevalent in the hierarchy & its the Novus Ordo itself which Our Lady warned about

I never could understand that, back in the day when I was a naive Catholic and believed all clergymen were good and surely would do what Our Lady asks. I remember reading somewhere that the third secret involved the apostasy of priests, the evils of their sexual predatory patterns as well as the corruption of the Vatican bank (which Father eludes to). Perhaps this was why it was not revealed. Satan always tries to destroy from within as well as from without and now we know more about these evil men, wolves in sheep's clothing, we can pray for them, their victims and that their actions do not destroy the RCC and the saving of souls.

What if you are the pope and the secret is something you learned in seminary: The Catholic church is knowingly teaching a false truth, and is ignoring that teachings of Jesus that says WE are gods, like him. How quick would you be to advertise that?

@@gailg1458 Jesus was not an idiot and said nothing so stupid. In fact, self-worship is the definition of evil.

@@edwardbaker1331 You're right. Jesus was NOT an idiot. That why he said: "Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods"’ and in another case, "I am not asking on behalf of them alone, but also on behalf of those who will believe in Me through their message, that all of them may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I am in You. May they also be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me. I have given them the glory You gave Me, so that they may be one as We are one-… If we are doing as Jesus said to do, we are recognizing the divinity of every one of us.

@@gailg1458 You are not fit to make that blasphemous interpretation. Potential salvation, for which no one can be presumptuous, is not divinity numbskull.

Exactly right. And conflicts between prelates themselves.

God gives us everything. We pray to the mother of Jesus to pray to God for us. God said he'd send the Holy Ghost to the Vicar of Christ, the Pope. That's divine revelation. Catholics don't believe in personal revelations.

@@emmettbrown6418 Catholics most certainly do believe in authentic private revelations. Where do you think the rosary came from? Authentic revelations are the exact opposite of phony revelations, such as the ongoing idiocies of Medjugorje.

Truth dilutes the power and control of leaders. Today, little is discussed about the history of the Holy Roman Empire because it was so dark & in many ways is the foundation of modern day Christianity.

The word from Our Lord (or the Blessed Virgin) was “it will be revealed VERY late” NOT “TOO late”

@James Boanerges - Thank you for your comment. Actually, it is the Consecration of Russia, not the publication of the Third Secret, which Our Lady promised would be the definitive act bringing an end to the punishments of God upon our sinful world. And truly it is now too late to prevent World War II, the spread of Russia's errors to the extent that they have thus far been spread, and the wars, persecutions, and incalculable human suffering which has followed. With further delay, it may also soon be too late to prevent the annihilation of whole nations. But we have Our Lady's unconditional promise that the requested Consecration will someday take place, and that it will then bring about its full miraculous effects of conversion and peace: "In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, it will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world." In the meantime, a very unfortunate English mistranslation was published in a collection of Sister Lucy’s Memoirs and Letters, where she recounted Our Lord's words in a letter of May 1936 to her spiritual director Father Goncalves, putting “too late” where the original Portuguese clearly states simply “late”: "They did not want to heed My request. Like the King of France, they will repent and do it, but IT WILL BE LATE [mas sera tarde]. Russia will have already spread its errors throughout the world, provoking wars and persecutions against the Church: the Holy Father will have much to suffer." There was never any instance in which Our Lord or Our Lady said that it would be too late for us to heed the Fatima requests. Let us remember too Our Lord's admonition given in the same communication above: "It will never be too late to have recourse to Jesus and Mary." God bless you.

Thank you for making that distinction. God bless you and your awesome work.

Thank you! Yes, Our Lady will see us through these dark times. Her Fatima Message is crucial to the salvation of our souls no less than to the preservation of our lives! God bless you.

Thank you for your comment. It is clear that the text published on June 26, 2000 is not part of the document that we were expecting, but it does appear to be an authentic part of the Third Secret. Obviously, though, we still await and desperately need to hear the still concealed part -- the continuation of Our Lady’s words beginning “In Portugal the dogma of the faith will always be preserved”. This discovery that the Third Secret itself consists of both a vision and Our Lady’s explanatory words (just as the previously known portion of the Secret consists of the Vision of Hell and Our Lady’s accompanying words, “You have seen Hell where the souls of poor sinners go...”) explains a host of puzzling discrepancies, and possibly also sheds light on several partially misunderstood references. It would be tedious to list here all of these details, but in general terms we can now understand the lapse of time between the first occasion in which Sister Lucy was finally enabled to begin writing and her notification to Bishop da Silva that the task was complete; why Sister Lucy spoke of having initially placed the text(s) in two places; what Father Schweigl meant in describing the Third Secret as consisting of two parts; why there are two different dates given for the transfer of the Third Secret from Lisbon to Rome; why it is said to have been stored thereafter in two different places (the papal apartment and the Holy Office archives); why several Popes (John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II) are each reported to have read the Secret for the first time on two different dates; and why the Secret is described sometimes as being easy to read, and at other times as too difficult to read without the help of a translator. It is not far-fetched to acknowledge the possibility that the Third Secret was committed to writing in two separate texts. God bless you.

The seed of the woman will crush the head of the serpent.

The 2000 is just a ruse. The real secret is still silenced. It's obviously referring to vatican II as an evil council if you ask me. The heads are the ones promoting this abomination.

I trust in the Bible and the divine revelations of the true Popes.

Yes, but not in Vatican obdience to the Holy Mother

Be assured that you and all of our supporters are in our daily prayers! God bless you.

Thank you! At minute 14, Mr. Rodriguez discusses Fr. Augustin Fuentes' interview with Sister Lucia, which can be found on our website at fatima.org/silencing-of-the-messengers-father-fuentes-1959-1965/ God bless you.

With the canonization of Paul IV being the most dubious.

Third secret is about "Satan in the Vatican" written by Fr. Luigi Villa

@@WT-Sherman I think you mean, Paul VI not IV

he's dead

Since 1960. When the Secret is revealed Our Lady will say what every Traditional Catholic has been saying all along that's wrong with the Conciliar Church. Beginning with Vatican 2, the New Mass, New Sacraments, false Ecumenism and maybe even actions/inactions of the Conciliar Popes.

I have to wonder did she request that it be released in 1960 , which would have been two years before Vatican II, correct? If the pope of 1960 had obeyed, our lady’s request, maybe we would not have had the Vatican 2 council and we would still have Latin mass available in every city , in every state, in every country in the world. We would not have the abuse of receiving in the hand, we would not have the abuse of laypeople distributing the Eucharist. And Most important of all Satanists would not be able to easily steal the Eucharist because of the Eucharist not being allowed in the hand. The Saint Michael prayer would be said after every Low mass As part of the leonine prayers. Every Catholic would know what the last four things are and what the seven deadly sins are. I would be able to go to my childhood parish on first Saturdays, and do the five first Saturdays devotion, because they would still have a high altar there. Unfortunately, like most of the Catholic churches, they do not have a high altar anymore. They do have a restored communion rail, but because they do the new mass only and they allow communion the hand I do not go there for first Saturday. If my situation with transportation for Saturday morning to the Latin mass chapel changes, then I might be able to start doing the first five Saturdays maybe in February.

@@femaleKCRoyalsFan Thank you for your comment. You do well to adhere to the traditional rite of Holy Mass, and to avoid having part in the sacrileges and desecration involved in the practice of "Communion in the hand." But with the permission of a priest, it is still possible for you to make the First Saturday devotions in spite of not having access to a suitable Mass on Saturdays. Sister Lucia put this very question to Our Lord on May 29, 1930, regarding people who for some reason (such as being in remote areas where there is no Mass on Saturdays) cannot perform the requested reparatory devotions on the First Saturday. Our Lord's answer was that a priest may allow the faithful to make their First Saturday devotions on the Sunday following the First Saturday. "The practice of this devotion," He said, "will be equally acceptable on the Sunday following the first Saturday when My priests, for a just cause, allow it to souls." Remember also please that it is important -- even essential to this devotion -- to formulate an intention when you make each of the four acts as an offering in reparation for sins committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary. God bless you.

Christ never said the church would be run by his mother issuing private revelations

@@femaleKCRoyalsFan The best post I've read yet! Exactly what various friends and I have been doing since 1959. Thanks, femaleKCRoyalsFan! I was in an all-girls Catholic school when the Sisters told us about the Fatima secret that was supposed to be unveiled in 1960. So we prayed Rosaries after Rosaries, a holy "cramming" so to speak, before the deadline. We did the First Saturday devotions, were invested with the Brown scapulars, and took our turns at adoration of the Blessed Sacrament during school hours. We memorized the Angels' prayers at Fatima. We learned everything we could about Fatima. We made little sacrifices, not quite as stringent as Jacinta's and Francisco's heroic sacrifices, but we did our best. Then 1960 came around and - nothing! We were very young then, and were very disappointed. A priest told us that it didn't matter what the secret was - we should continue what we've been doing. Pray the Morning Offering and the Rosary every day. If possible, go to daily Mass and receive Holy Communion. Go to confession on First Friday/First Saturday every month, etc. New friends came into my life and old friends left, but we continued what we were doing. Vatican II struck us dumb when we saw the church sanctuary gutted and the altar rails gone, and Latin disappeared from the Mass. Still we went on. And on, and on, up to now. The least we can do. Thanks again, femaleKC. God bless you. Have a great New Year!

@@RPlavo Correct. But Christ never stopped his mother from caring for people, especially those near various dangers. Okay, so the would-be embarrassment of the newlyweds at Cana, if they had ran out of wine before the wedding festivities were over, was just a small danger on the face of it. Still, Our Blessed Mother cared enough to save them from the embarrassment, by telling her Son, "Do something!" And He did. Jesus was obedient to His mother's initiatives.

Thank you for this important question. Just as there are limits to the proper use of authority, so too are there limits to the contexts of true obedience. We cannot be lawfully forbidden to discharge the duties of our state in life, which include above all our religious duties of correct belief and worship. True obedience is a virtue, but false obedience (which St. Thomas calls indiscreet obedience: www.newadvent.org/summa/3104.htm ) is a sinful matter. "We ought to obey God, rather than men." (Acts 5:29) Catholic theologians are unanimous on this, that even legitimate authority, including ecclesiastical authority, is to be resisted if it acts in opposition to the Faith or to the law of God. remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/6240-the-priestly-impasse-when-obedience-becomes-a-sin onepeterfive.com/obedience-disobedience-rash/

We need God the Father, God the Son Jesus and God the Holy Spirit 🕊️ ✝️

@@jamesmedina6015 yep! The Holy Spirit is the One within me! I Know all three..but Jesus Most!

He also said, "He who has ears, let him hear." Presumably, he who does not want to listen, let him remain deaf.

Dr Taylor Marshall has done a whole podcast on this.

Sister lucy truth

@@fukofutube22 a former Episcopal telling the truth while wolves in sheep’s clothing terrified and submissive to their father of lies. However, The Catholic Church will stand against their father and all his vicious attacks, no matter what, as warned in The Holy Bible.

Which one, the original or the one the Church came up with?

@Therese sends roses - Thank you for your interest. At minute 14, Mr. Rodriguez discusses Fr. Augustin Fuentes' interview with Sister Lucia, which can be found on our website at fatima.org/silencing-of-the-messengers-father-fuentes-1959-1965/

Thank you for your question. Our Lady of Fatima's requests, in this as well as in other matters, calls for the obedience of the Church's hierarchy to the commands of Heaven. There is no short-cut or substitute for this long-overdue obedience. God bless you.

Thank you for your comment. First, it must be noted that there does not exist in the history of the Church an apparition of Our Lady which is more thoroughly authenticated by Heaven or endorsed by the Church than the Fatima apparitions. Consider please that Our Lady of Fatima worked an unprecedented public miracle, the time and place of which She had announced three months in advance in order to assure an unimpeachable body of eye-witness testimony of the fact, precisely so that everyone both then and for generations to come would have ample reason to believe in the authenticity of Her apparitions and Message. This Miracle of the Sun, witnessed by an estimated 70-100 thousand people, was far more stupendous even than the miracle by which the Prophet Elias called down fire from Heaven (3 Kings 18), which the Pharisees of Our Lord’s day challenged Him to repeat (Mt. 16; Lk. 11) - which grace He refused to them. It is no small matter that He granted such a miracle to authenticate His Mother’s witness in our own day. Theologians have long distinguished private revelations, binding only the visionaries themselves to believe, from General Revelation (the Deposit of Faith) demanding of all mankind the assent of supernatural faith. In our own time, the Message of Fatima has been recognized as truly unique and in a class of its own, “sui generis” - neither a private revelation, nor a part of General Revelation (unless it is someday determined that Our Lady of Fatima is the fulfillment of the biblical prophecy of the Woman of Revelation in Apocalypse 12). Drawing from the writings of Bishop (Dr.) Rudolph Graber of Regensburg, Germany and the Carmelite theologian, Fr. Joseph de Sainte-Marie (both theologians of international renown), Father Gruner described Fatima as a “public prophetic revelation.” Public, that is, in that as Pope John Paul II himself acknowledged in his homily at Fatima on May 13, 1982, it is addressed to all mankind, to the extent that it imposes an obligation of belief and obedience upon the whole Church. Recall please this injunction from God: "Despise not prophecies. But prove all things; hold fast that which is good." (1 Thess. 5: 20-21) The Church has thoroughly tested this Message and found it to be from Heaven. Therefore we have a moral religious duty to docilely receive and obey it. And if the Church further rules someday that Our Lady of Fatima is the "Great Sign" prophesied by St. John (Apoc. 12: 1), then belief in Fatima will be found to be required even with the assent of divine faith. In the meantime, too, since Our Lady has removed all reasonable occasion for disbelief in Her Message (as announced by the visionaries) by sealing their testimony with the Miracle of the Sun, we can also speak of an existential need to believe. Here we have a warning from an unquestionably knowledgeable and good-willed source, alerting us to imminent dangers to our lives and souls. Only a sinful rashness and temerity could dismiss such a supernatural warning. And in this regard, we would agree with Bishop Graber in saying that any Pope or bishop who refuses to comply with this request from Heaven, given the dire consequences sure to follow, would be guilty of a crime against humanity. Those who have chosen to pay no attention to Our Lady's Message - besides being the cause of great sadness to Our Lady, as Sister Lucia affirmed to Father Fuentes - should consider whether their salvation is at grave risk through their impious resistance to the designs of Heaven. Truly, what safety has anyone, whether Catholic or not, found in ignoring Our Lady's warnings and requests? As we look around, in the world and in the Church, we see the very disaster which She spoke of at Fatima unfolding, worst of all in the diabolically disoriented minds of modern men, Catholics included. Our Lady of Fatima spoke of souls falling into hell, in large part due to sins which directly blaspheme the Immaculate Heart of Mary, for which reason She came to ask for our prayers and sacrifices in reparation on their behalf. The loss incurred by ignoring such a plea is incalculable. Meanwhile, too, knowing that there is absolutely no other way open to mankind to avoid the terrible punishments which the sins of the world deserve than for us to call upon the Immaculate Heart of Mary by means of the Consecration of Russia, we see the how foolish and tragic an attitude of disbelief and indifference toward this Message is. Possibly all of Our Lady's dire prophecies, including the annihilation of whole nations, will have come to pass before the Consecration is performed, or perhaps our prayers and sacrifices will bring about the fulfillment of Our Lady's request in time to prevent any further unfolding of the present wars, persecutions, and spreading errors. In either scenario, Our Lady's words of 1952 hold true that only She can help us, and that this help can only be secured through the Consecration of Russia. "Without this Consecration, Russia will not be able to convert, nor can the world have peace." Finally, regarding the appropriateness of requiring the visionaries to keep part of Her Message secret for a time, consider please how manifestly prudent is now appears to have reserved a warning of betrayal and apostasy for the time in which it directly applied. How could the Catholics of the first half of the 20th Century have understood a warning that was not for them to act upon, but for the faithful of the latter half, beginning about 1960: that they would not be able to trust the guidance or integrity of Church leaders, even down to the level of the Catholic school systems? That - as is reliably known of the contents of the still-hidden Third Secret - from the highest levels of the Church there would come a movement leading the faithful into heresy and false worship, even apostasy? The Fatima Message is crucial to the salvation of our souls no less than to the preservation of our lives. God bless you.

I am most grateful for your scholarly and heartfelt reply. I of course do not or dare not speak ill of Our Lady in any way and fully accept the authenticity of the "miracle of the sun." Who could reasonably deny a phenomenon witnessed by so many? Moral and intellectual corruption within the Church at high levels is most saddenning. My queries were put in good faith and not cynically or mockingly. In future, I shall be more vigilant, prudent and circumspect. I shall also pray for you and your work.

@@daviddecelles8714 Thank you for your reply. Our Lady is surely very pleased by your devotion to Her! God bless you.

There was also visions from Our Lady of Akita. Japanese nun saying the same exact things.

@@MareRS357 Yep and someone that seeing the third secret said that it’s basically the same thing as Akita message.

The Garabandal message revealed nothing. It is completely false and has been condemned time and time again. When will the penny drop?

Thank you for your question. It was assumed that there was only one text of the Third part of the Secret of Fatima until June 26, 2000 when Vatican authorities published an account of a Vision given to the seers. This 4-page text contained 64 lines, and in other ways as well did not correspond to what is reliably known about the still-hidden text (comprising 25-30 lines on a single page, being the words of Our Lady beginning, "In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved." This discovery that the Third Secret itself consists of both a vision and Our Lady’s explanatory words (just as the previously known portion of the Secret consists of the Vision of Hell and Our Lady’s accompanying words, “You have seen Hell where the souls of poor sinners go...”) explains a host of puzzling discrepancies, and possibly also sheds light on several partially misunderstood references. It would be tedious to list here all of these details, but in general terms we can now understand the lapse of time between the first occasion in which Sister Lucy was finally enabled to begin writing and her notification to Bishop da Silva that the task was complete; why Sister Lucy spoke of having initially placed the text(s) in two places; what Father Schweigl meant in describing the Third Secret as consisting of two parts; why there are two different dates given for the transfer of the Third Secret from Lisbon to Rome; why it is said to have been stored thereafter in two different places (the papal apartment and the Holy Office archives); why several Popes (John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II) are each reported to have read the Secret for the first time on two different dates; and why the Secret is described sometimes as being easy to read, and at other times as too difficult to read without the help of a translator. All of these anomalies were suddenly understood when it became apparent that the Third Secret had been committed to writing in two separate texts. God bless you.

@@TheFatimaCenter Wow, Okay alot of info to ingest but I am so intrigued as so many probably are in knowing this 3rd secret from our beloved blessed virgin🙏 Mary and pray our Shepards of christ soon reveal it! Thank you so much for such in depth knowledge and research of Fatima and keep pushing out these great videos, GOD BLESS YOU ALL🙏🙏🙏💗

Thank you for this important question. Father Rodriguez spoke about this topic in a recent video here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sJqbjZOjzKqphIU.html God bless you.

Which country does the Lebanese priest come from?

Those two names alone, through their positive association with Medjugorje (and other false apparitions and locutionists) can be discounted as reasonable or reliable sources right away.

Curious about this- can you paste a link to this? Edit- it’s okay I found it. Utter trash.

Vatican 1 said that St Peter would have perpetual successors. There will be no end of the Pope's until the Second Coming. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the alleged prophecies of St Malachy are spurious and cannot be attributed to St Malachy.

Also, they probably didn't want to upset the Russian Orthodox heirarchy, especially since they have been invited to the Vatican II council.

Very Long. But Vatican 2 with its Documents will be reduced to Ashes by the publication of the Secret.

Thank you for your question. The vision of the "Bishop dressed in White" published by the Vatican in the year 2000 is undoubtedly a part of the Third Secret, but we have not yet seen the words of Our Lady explaining that vision. Sr. Lucia told us in her Fourth Memoir that Our Lady began Her explanation with the words, "In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved." God bless you.

Thank you for your question. Saint John the Baptist was conceived in a state of Original Sin, from which he was cleansed while still in the womb at about six months gestation. Thus, like Our Lord and Our Lady, he was born in the state of sanctifying grace. Theirs are the only three birthdays commemorated in the Church's liturgical calendar. God bless you.

St. John the Baptist was not immaculately conceived. He was born without sin because on the sixth month of his mother's (Elizabeth) pregnancy, Mary (herself pregnant with Jesus) visited her and he (John) lifted in the womb of his mother. That amounted to John's baptism and freedom from original sin. That was why John the Baptist was born without sin, but he was not conceived without sin.

The prophecies of Malachy 😂 good grief.

Thank you for this important question. Father Gruner spoke directly about this possibility on various occasions, declaring that it is a completely believable scenario. See minutes 102-107 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nNpympaept6zgKc.html

@@TheFatimaCenter Sister Lucy Truth is not only believable, it's 100% proven, as their website presents, and it goes hand in hand with the Great Apostasy in the Church, and I believe the vitiated 1958 papal conclave after many years of enemy infiltration.

@@TheFatimaCenter you are being dishonest. It’s clear Gruner rejected the idea as an urban legend. And did so on more than one occasion. Why do you not cite his interview with John Vennari? It was produced by your own channel. Sadly I suspect you are jumping on the same bandwagon as it grows in popularity. You should be a witness to the truth. What a position to box yourself into. Sad.

@@otisbdriftwood6520 Thank you for your reply. On the contrary, Father Gruner's expressed opinion on the question of an imposter was that it was a completely believable tactic of the enemies of Fatima in the Vatican, and that it was highly likely that this had occurred on at least a number of occasions. See minutes 102-107 of the Mystery of Iniquity Q&A session, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nNpympaept6zgKc.html You will notice as well that when Father Gruner and John Vennari discussed the matter in the Your Questions Answered episode which you mention, Father's view differed strikingly from Mr. Vennari's. See kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b7OKi5tz0pPFl5c.html Father Gruner did not find it difficult to believe that Vatican authorities would resort to using an impostor to foist a misrepresentation of the Fatima message on the faithful (see 7:00 - 7:30), and in fact he had already published an article to that effect in a 1993 issue of The Fatima Crusader, concluding that if the woman with whom Carlos Evaristos and others met did indeed make the statements which they attributed to her, then that woman must have been someone other than the real Sister Lucy. See “A False Lucy Substituted for the True?” by Frere François, web.archive.org/web/20130319080946/www.fatimacrusader.com/cr44/cr44pg36.asp Father's main point in the Your Questions Answered episode was to insist that there are many indications that the real Sister Lucy was still alive well after 1960, and among these indications are some very important official testimonies of the fact that Heaven is still awaiting the Consecration of Russia. John Vennari pointed out in the above video that at that time the speculations of a longstanding imposture had no credible basis, being based only on amateurish comparisons of a smattering of photographs, and at 8:40 he mentions that what is needed to settle the question is a true and proper investigation. Clearly we must agree that it would be a tremendous grace for the entire Church if such an investigation were to establish the truth in this matter, particularly because if is irrefutably demonstrated that that woman was an impostor, the whole “Sister Lucy said the Consecration was done” canard will immediately collapse. God bless you.

@@TheFatimaCenter on the contrary you are (wilfully?) misrepresenting what Vennari and Gruner say in this interview. Gruner calls the idea of a fake Sister Lucia stemming from around the 1960s as “utterly ridiculous”. What he does concede is that people in the ecclesiastical hierarchy were falsely attributing quotes on the consecration (some typed) to Lucia in the 80s, but he rigorously maintains Lucia is speaking consistently up to July 1989 when she is physically meeting people. He even cites her elder sister visiting her in the 80s - her closest blood relative - to make precisely the point that Lucia could not be dead and replaced. That is a fact. Vennari moreover correctly cites the need for use of primary sources - of which Lucia’s immediate family are the most obvious. Her family members look like her. As Vennari says, this stuff that is being propagated is not scholarly nor objective, but “shallow” rubbish. As he said go Coimbra and talk to the local community. They would laugh at you. This is a cultural dead end and it so sad that the Fatima Center has headed this way. Embarrassing.

I know nothing and in any case all these Marion apparitions are such poor manifestations of messages from heaven I cannot take them seriously. It does not compute in my mind how or why Heavens miracles are so poorly executed leaving so much to impressions of the imagination. Cecile B. DeMille really would do them so much better.

PS.I will state this that John Paul 2 was the most beloved Pope in history and actually reached across the great divide of Christians world wide (which to my mind is really the biggest scandal in regards to the Catholic Church starting with Henry the eighth. and many contradicting sectors.)How who or what was behind the attempted assassination of John Paul which badly affected his overall health . has been left unsolved is another scandal .Dare to undermine his canonization at your peril. .While you look at what has been allowed to propagate within the Vatican today.🙏

David Rodriguez and Father Michael Rodriguez are brothers. God bless you.

Not a good idea !,

I thought so too.I think their voices are similair as well.

They are biological brothers from the same parents.

Mr80jb, No, the Church does not become illegal if it does not reveal the full secret. The trouble is, it seemed Lucia had changed the subject of who can access the third secret. First, she said it should be revealed to the world by 1960, or if she died before 1960. Then, years later, she said the third secret was meant only for the pope. With that, it's either the third secret's intended audience was changed; or that Sr. Lucia has been changed by someone else, i.e., another Sister who pretended to be Sr. Lucia.

the third seacert is both pope will be shot by anti christ who are the wef because they want control of and enslave all of us give the nformation to us we all ready know what it is tell the truth

It only surprises the Apostates. Traditionalists are not surprised.

Pray for truth🙏🙏🙏

They are brothers.

The biblical and historical descriptions of Jesus tell us that He was Jewish.

Thank you for your comment. In her Third Memoir, Sister Lucia wrote, "The secret is made up of three distinct parts, two of which I am now going to reveal." God bless you.