It's super useful for expanding the 9100!

Thanks for the kind words, we're glad you enjoyed the video!

Thanks Alejandro! It's our dream mixer too...

Thanks Mark, very kind of you! Hoping you get a chance to enjoy the 9100 soon...

Great minds Mark, I have those two mixers as well, would be good to know your thoughts on the latest addition after you’ve had a chance to put it to some use!

How do rate the 2015 Rane?

The Xone 96 is an analog path when you're not using it with a computer.

How do you rate the rane?

You're not alone!

Yeah not use woodworking screws, very ugly and not high end. Of course this whole video is just advertisement since they sell this mixer.

Isn't it just!

@@junodj8149 ...Just like a woman? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sM6gaLucnLmyZ6M.html

SSL Big Six is awesome and also costs $3k, at these prices high end studio mixers become relevant.

That's a good point! We had previously wanted to demonstrate both but were a bit strapped for time - perhaps something for a future feature...

Thanks Drew!

Thanks Ole! Yeah combining it with the Zen is certainly quite something...

kzfaq.info/love/img8K4JC9ykmPDT6LR3-fw

I noticed the video shows the audio being effected by the ISO EQ. See from 5:10. An audio recording device must have been used to pick it up.

@DoFunkk You Can use the RCA house o/p to record the Master Isolator

Hey Alan, thanks for the kind words! Yeah I would agree about the A&H being a strong comparison, I chose the Pioneer just as that's what most DJs would be familiar with!

@@junodj8149 Yeah you should have compared the 9100 with the Model 1 mixer. Of course this is just a marketing video for Alpha Recording and not really a good one at that..

@@ItsThatJahncke2 well don't buy it then. i think this thing looks top notch. if i ever got the cash i'm getting one. leave it up to the nit pickers to always find something to complain about. besides, comparing the model 1 to this is comparing apples to oranges. two machines built for entirely different purposes or ways of playing. if you don't understand that, are you even a dj?

@@XX-121 Why wouldn't he compare the two. It would make for a real interesting video to be honest. No I'm not a DJ. I only use mixers for studio use, instruments, analog gear, Etc.

@@ItsThatJahncke2 the answer to that is in my previous comment. and so you use dj mixers in your "studio"? why? they're so much more expensive than one built for what you say you are doing

We can't remember which track off this LP it is but the record is Maxim Wolzyn - Intercity Express!

Amazing! Thanks for the support...

We do not sadly, that's how they're supplied to us!

Would take too much space and not as portable.

you got to just play by ear. it's not really made for slamming in tracks. but if you actually look at it, there's a button you push to put the vu meters in cue/pgm mode so the left one shows the cue track and the right one shows the master

Hey there! We wanted to draw a comparison for people who may not have heard of rotary mixers and wondering why something like the ARS 9100 might cost so much in comparison to what they're used to. We'd love to take some time to compare it to its rotary counterparts, perhaps we'll get a chance at some point...

I wouldn't call this mixer hi end.

@@kamilkubik Thanks for sharing. That was an insightful comment.

@@kamilkubik and what you will call hi end?

​@@kamilkubik Right? Total garbage. My mixer is £50k and i only play unopened records

I think it’s porn

Mastersounds mk2

What model of turntables isn’t a “joke?”

@@coreyoliver3653 I think he means it should have been a Technics.

That’s all he can afford after dishing out 3k for a mixer.

Its one big advert.....

Our mistake there! Little slip of the tongue

@@junodj8149 No problem! Can happen. Just we are not that old 🤣

Also used a Soundcraft Urei pic and not an original.

@@secretsquirrel2 Hi Joseph! This was the highest quality image we could source, unfortunately not a lot of 2K images of the original Urei about sadly

Lol. Good catch. I was thinking the same thing.

Hey Alastair! Surprisingly there are not many clean HD images of the 1620 so we went with the LE as we had high resolution imagery for this version!

@@junodj8149 LOL terrible Soundcraft knockoff, what glue have you been sniffing? From a build quality point of view it's superior to the original.

This gossip, I have both, the OG 1620 and the limited edition. The original 1620 is a bit louder, and probably better in terms of the measured signal-to-noise ratio. Otherwise you can't go wrong with the Le Version. A very well done remake. Stereo depth and stage, sound signature and most importantly, the summation.

also i hope you haven't spent money on that vinyl 🥲 that would be a shame tbh

you are so wrong man LOL

Sorry but you’re wrong take a vinyl record and a lossless version of the same track and listen the difference is night and day the bottom end is much heavier and the overall sound will be louder and more dynamic through vinyl.

@@ravinderteji9059 Digital exceed any analog format in any metric , it’s quantitative and can be proven measured and with math . I love vinyl and analog gear , I own tape and vinyl players , but as engineer I know analog it’s imperfect , mechanical , degrades , and it’s why I love , the color added , and that some music it’s not available digital/streaming. However for clarity , high fidelity , if you can get the digital master in lossless format , can’t be beaten by analog . But won’t have character (color) added , I think it’s why this mixer may be very good, but won’t beat a DJM using coaxial digital .

The Ninja Tune delay is definitely worth the money in our opinion...

kzfaq.info/love/img8K4JC9ykmPDT6LR3-fw

Plenty of headroom on each channel though!

@@junodj8149 it’s not my way of playing. When I put on a record the first thing is to set the the track on 0 db so later when it’s in the mix it’s set correctly. With lots of these rotary mixers you have to be careful and gentle. It’s fine for slow styles but often I like to go hard and then it’s useless.

they are better options than masterSounds!!!

@@tonydeepdisco2417 don't say the urie 1620 coz that's outdated.... E&S isn't any better, nor is Condesa...and the Allen and heath Xone V6 isn't made any more and the rarest mixer out there....I kinda know my stuff.... Enlighten me fella

@@tonydeepdisco2417 lol...you use a condesa with bog standard RCA cables and balanced line to speakers....lol... If you want to play the hifi game....then game on...I hope what you use is more than 30 grand.... I have ATC speakers, mark Levinson amp and Audio research valve pre amp...etc....I kinda know my sounds mate...

@@djdeejdjay8669 that nice i know my stuff too i have a condesa lucia, super stereo dn78 and bozak ar-4 mistly i play in night clubs in nyc with good sound systems,, looking for my 4 rotary mixer now,, the important thing here is to understand what is under the hood and what is a discrete circuit vs a integrate circuit!!

@@djdeejdjay8669 that sounds good!! valve make a big difference

kzfaq.info/love/img8K4JC9ykmPDT6LR3-fw

@@javierezquerro8998 absolutely smashed it bud , superb video & tunes👍

Nonsense

@@s_9878 lololololol...are you ready to be proven wrong. I've just got a mastersounds 4V. I will do a video of my set up. I'm not boasting, I'm just a very keen audiophile and my set up is about 30 grand. Google ATC SCM 20 speakers...let's just say you don't put them on a £200 amp. The first thing I done when I got my Technics Mk5g decks was de-solder all of the cables and I put on Russ Andrew power cables and black rhodium RCA cables and also modded with an isolation platter and different slipmat and made my own record clamps...that's over £300 per deck of modifications. Epic fail fella lol. People do chat rubbish on KZfaq, but unfortunately this time fella you've met someone that isn't lolololol. I will do a video tonight and post you the link 😜

@@djdeejdjay8669 😆 I’ve got a radius 2 valve actually, lovely mixer, sounds great, a joy to play on and does some things brilliantly that lower quality rotaries struggle with (summing for example) I work for a company that designs and builds audio equipment. One of our head engineers was a consultant on a fairly (in)famous 100k + pair of audiophile speakers (I’m not going to name names here) he gave me the warts and all hard truth about super audiophile products and the long and short of it is it’s massively placebo and a great example of buyer confirmation and diminishing returns with your hard earned cash. What you are spunking your money on is slightly different flavas of sound, with pretty hard to define ‘improvements’! One thing I will say is the fact that we know the placebo effect is real, if it can literally heal the body it’s not that much of a stretch to see how it can make people believe they are hearing vast ‘improvements’ There’s a pretty fine line between getting the most out of a setup and being one of the poor fools who claim their 20k cables sound incredible (my Technics are also modified with the same upgrades you’ll find in big clubs like Fabric etc - ie sensible upgrades) You’ve clearly got the funds to afford it and I can see why so many people enjoy chasing chimeras but you’re being partly duped. I suggest you learn about building speakers and amps you’ll have a much better understanding about the physics of sound reproduction, what’s important and where it’s worth spending money. Also, I hope you’ve got adequate room treatment to go with those lovely speakers :)

​@@s_9878 RIP Dee J Djay

@@s_9878 lolololol...there's one thing being told and then another in the know! My father is a patent attorney and has specialised in hifi for for 40 years! Also I have mate that has worked for mission and sennheiser and now does satellite communication and I have also got extensive knowledge in this hifi... Yes you do get different variations in sound with things, but if you're experienced you will know when something is getting accurate. The money I have spent is sensible and it's also very technical and obviously something you know very little about...like RF contamination, vibration isolation, soundstage, passive pre amps, difference classes of power, phasing, delay, detail, punch, septation, timing colouration etc etc... Yes people can go too far with hifi and yes it think it's over the top...but you also must believe in hi end audio, otherwise you wouldn't be buying a mastersounds mixer lol...behave lol... I've set up and owned and heard more hifi then you can poke a stick at and I earned my stripes and cut my teeth mainly setting up car hifi systems and hearing the difference with different set ups and methods....yes there is a lot of snake oil going on but there is also a lot of development money to get back when inventing something. You've been watching KZfaq vids about room conditioning lol....it's acoustics mate and that's all down to sound which is variable in a room or setting...that can also be a bit snake oil....it's all about changing the sound and delay etc...hence it's preference and that's why most concert halls etc have panels in the roof which you can adjust... You contradicted your self in your retort after your short and rude and dismissive nonsense comment lol... I can see further than my nose and can see things from both sides and I make my own conclusions and don't listen to what others say without knowing my stuff and having conclusive evidence.

@E.F. R. Yes, all of the world’s problems can totally be placed on the market for boutique, handmade Japanese rotary mixers, I agree.

@E.F. R. it doesn't sound much better than a vestax/gemini/allen n heath/rane etc . A fool and their money is soon parted.

I can wait until rotary mixers cost the same as "regular" ones. I will then listen to comparatives.

A foolish statement , What mixers have you compared ?

@@user-rv8wb1nl1b exactly"🤔i still have an old vintage Vestax, and itz Fântastik,😁👌🔊dont get me wrong I love thiz mixer " the urei" Bozak"rane mp2015" im reaL old school 🤗🎼🎵🎶remember itz what you feel , in the Muzik we D.J. or make others Njoi,🤗👍not what you Spend on it...cheers

Why comment that if you aren't going to list your reasons? Worthless input otherwise.