So good to hear them described as content cameras and the benefits on leaner shoots! I picked up an FX6 for smaller productions so I didn't always need to hire, and it's been amazing to use on these. The image looks great for its price, it's light, has lower power and data consumption, built-in NDs, and good ergonomics for handheld and shoulder work and even the AF in a pinch (similar advantages to the Canon's). Whilst the image is important, it's just so easy to work with on the smaller content shoots where we don't have all the resources and crew available. I built my kit, so the rest of the accessories and camera support is pretty overkill for the FX6, and this means I only need to hire the camera body and lenses for larger shoots/TVCs, Alexa Mini etc.

I too run with 2 C70's and an R5c. Done. Finished. They cover all the bases. The images are stellar and that's what we sell so... yea. Happy.

Excellent real world advice, thank you!

Recently switched from Blackmagic cameras to Red Komodo for narrative work. Coupled with vintage Leica R lenses we’re blown away by the image. Thanks for a great video with lots of details

Fantastic video .. explained well with real life examples

Ah you did it. I remember commenting a while back after having a horror experience with multiple G2 bodies and had to return them. Ended up going A Cam / B Cam with C300iii and C70. I could not be happier with the combo and there’s really nothing I can’t do with that combo.

2:12 agreed! I've been using a BMP 6K pro and URSA 6k. Phenomenal image but more work than needed for most one/two man crew jobs.

Fantastic video. Great insight. cheers.

If you are an aspiring cinematographer who hopes to shoot a Hollywood level production one day as a Director of Photography (or just wants to reach that level), a Blackmagic can be an invaluable and unbeatable asset. This camera is a like a grand matured teacher and the first thing a Blackmagic teaches you is that you can make any type of film without the need of autofocus. Good DPs control what is outside the camera and just use the camera as a recording device. For example, lighting, framing, blocking, depth of field, camera movement etc. True, they need something which can do justice to their creativity while keeping things simple. But, it's mainly colour science, type of codec and the post production ecosystem. Blackmagic offers all of it. Also, pulling focus is not that tough. It is a skill which takes time to learn and master. But, once mastered, you get exceptional fulfilment while capturing life in front of the lens. I think Sony and Canon with their toys, which they release every other day at exorbitant prices, are lowering the bar. We are much capable whether as an artist or a creative professional. Don't lower the bar people. But, thank you for sharing your thoughts and making this video. It starts a conversation.

I have followed your camera journeys... I lean on the BM pocket series for my indep. cinema work, however you always point to the reasons to consider the features of the cameras as tools, in achieving multi-layered professional objectives.

Same story here, sold my BMPCC 6K and 4K to buy a C70 last year, and just bought a second one last week. The C70 fits all my needs and I'm still able to keep the RAW worlkflow I got used to with Blackmagic cameras

The image quality of the R5C is absolutely amazing.

Are you litterally answering every single comment... ...respect!

love the call for discussion. I am using the odd ball of the cinema world, the SIGMA fp. I just love the cine dng image in post and it is a way to get the large format look on a lower budget. I just got the 50mm t1.5 and LOVE it, so definitely look forward to see what you all do if you get the f1.4 HSM.

LOL was that hard green shift around @10:14 when talking about Sony color a subliminal diss? 😂 I love it

The green shift at 10:08 hahahahaha well played sir

I’m currently in between options. Just shot a doc in Africa with a Pocket 6k Pro and, for the weight restrictions of the airlines, it was great to have the portability. WHATEVER camera I go with next, I’ll be keeping the P6KPro because of its versatility.

Im with you. I didnt think i wanted or needed AF but Im realizing sometimes it would be pretty handy. Likely selling my BM6k soon.

You should check out the Phantom LUTs if you want to get "Arri like" colors out of the cameras. I've been using them on the C70 and R6 and love them!

Using R3, for video, does everything without rigging out, has clean shadows. No overheating.

Great video!

Nice thorough overview of your experiences and decisions. Helpful as I shop for a camera. C70 is high on my list. I have the same feeling about Sony. (funny that your slider shot has strong hints of Sony hues though) Too many choices! BM might just be the choice for my needs but this gives me great food for thought. Thanks!

I'm alone in virtually all my shoots. At most I'll have one extra person on set. I've chosen to go with the Sony FX3 - Bias af... I've always been into the sony camera world in one way or another. - Already had E-mount glass - Compact body with cinema look to the camera body itself. - Great codec with enough colors for my workflow. - Easy to throw on a gimble or rig out. But... if money wasn't a factor, I would have sold my glass and gone with the C70. Big fan of the image, built in NDs is just revolutionary for me. Great camera overall. At the end of the day the FX3 is a brilliant camera that does exactly what I need it to do and that's enough for me. I'll probably stick with it for at least another 3 years.

Did the same. Used to shoot m32 and eventually that led to the P4k. Great camera and format but having used other cameras it always felt like it was missing a few things. I protested AF for years because in my day there was no such thing as AF. When we did start getting AF it sucked. Then for fun and missing a photo camera I bought a Canon M6 mk2 to also see for myself what all the hype was over DPAF. Despite the line skipping and lack of log of the camera I was immediately blown away with the color and ability to focus insane;y well. I then sold it and bought a Canon R6. Absolutely loved the photos and video out of the box. C-log 3 was vastly better and easier to use than I ever experienced with m43 V-log L. Only problem is it didn’t have raw. Not a huge deal for content creation, or run/gun work but it was definitely a reason to need to keep both. I have since picked up R5 and I can’t believe how darn near perfect the camera is for me. 8k for over sampling, 8k true raw internal, 8k or 5k cropped ProRes raw external to a Ninja V. It really had it all plus amazing photos. Now I know it’s not a cinema camera and I recognize that and still like many aspects of the P4k but I think it’s time to move on. While slower the R5 has true raw video while BRAW is a debayered and partially processed in camera. Not a big deal but it’s enough of a deal that many P4k shooters are using really old firmware so they can keep using the true cdng raw format. It’s just nice knowing we can have true raw again. I also feel like C-log 3 gets a bad reputation because of the visible noise at ISO 800 but that’s by design. Canon packs a ton of stops above middle gray. 6.3 to be exact. ISO 800 is similar to ISO 800 or 1000 on the Pocket cameras with a ton of visible noise. It’s that level of ISO that gives you a similar over 6 stops above middle gray. When you compare the two that way it really puts into perspective how much C-log 3 does. We don’t get to remap the stops with ISO like we do on the Pockets but c-log 3 needs to be treated the same way. Shooting a stop over essentially gives the same cleaner look and 5.3 stops over of the P4k at its native ISO 400. Two stops over is like ISO 200 on the Pockets and 3 stops over is like ISO 100 or 1250 on the Pockets. Same limited highlight range but insanely clean shadows. C-log 3 is not a one size fits all log format. Much like the Pocket cameras you need to decide where you need the stops to be. Do you need to protect highlights or shadows? A low contrast green screen or dark house horror movie shoot could shoot 3 stops over since there is hardly any specular over 90% reflective anyway. Shooting outdoors you may want stronger highlights. Thing with Canon is since it starts higher at ISO 800 that about as worse as one may ever need the noise to be. 6.3 stops over is a ton and there is almost zero need to shoot under to gain more highlights. The dual native ISO on the R5 is amazing as well. While ISO800 may have the noise of ISO 800 on the Pocket cameras it’s ISO 3200 where the true strength of the R5 shines. It looks vastly cleaner than the P4k at ISO 3200 with the full amount of dynamic range. I trust ISO 3200 and even 6400 on the R5 a lot more than I do on the Pocket cameras. To me the second native ISO of the Pockets was always about having a cleaner ISO 1250 and 1600. Highlight detail was pretty crushed at that level however. Now I get the insane low light of ISO 3200 with the full dynamic range of the sensor. Even ISO 12,800 is usable on the R5 is some situations. Now keep in mind I believe light takes priority over sensor ISO. The reason we have dual native ISO however is so we don’t need as much light output. We still want to sculpt the shot with light but now we can do so with smaller LED lights that can run off a battery. This is where the ISO 3200 is pretty amazing on the R5.

Canon R5C, Panasonic GH6 and BMPCC 6k here. Can't quite stretch to a C70 (yet), but the R5C is hands down one of the best hybrid shooters out there and the GH6 is actually a good B-cam to the R5C, especially when you adapt EF glass, which I also use on the R5C. I have not had the urge to upgrade to RF glass, as I can use the filter adapter on the R5C with EF glass and that means, I have sort of internal NDs.

Hi tere. Nice video and content. What is your power solution for the R5C?

Really great review. I am curious what slider you're using to film yourself? A Rhino? Or Edelkrone?

Awseome review. i saw what you did with the colors when you said SONY ! hahah.. subtle but effective. :)

Great video and interesting timing for myself. I have been in the Black Magic ecosystem for some time now and I am considering a move to an FX9 to fill the space of my G2. I am all Sony for stills so moving over to the Canon feels like it would be a double change up.... One additional concern for me personally is the lack of support from BMD on their older cameras. Not long after the G2 came out, BMD dropped support for the G1 and would no longer service it, meaning if anything broke it was a paperweight. That is something that certainly gives me pause from continuing to purchase from them as a full time professional who relies on my gear for work...

I have an R5 and a R5C. I was very close to getting the C70 over the R5C but ultimately settled on the R5C as the image quality is not that much worse than the C70 and kit size was an important factor. Also, down the road I could always sell my R5 and the R5C could become a true hybrid and I could move up to a newer C camera if one were to come out.

Thanks for this info. I’ve used canon since 1999. Since over 10 years I shoot video and photos. In 2018 I bought 2 bmpcc4k. I love them, and for a while I was happy with it. But i don’t shoot cine or anything close to it. I do live events, corporate and some low end commercials. So I have 3 concerns about them. 1- I miss autofocus. 2- Can make them look exactly the same when I’m doing live events. For corporate I don’t mine because I shoot in raw. For b-roll I found myself more comfortable with ProRes. 3-After you rig them, they are heavy and the monitor is extremely hard to see when outdoors. I’ve been looking at Sony Fx6 but as you said, there is something in Sony colors that doesn’t convince me. Now, people are saying that the r5c autofocus isn’t as good as the r5. I have an r5 at work and I love it. But it overheated. But video quality is amazing. I want to keep the bmpcc4k and add something like r5c or c70 but I’m not sure yet. Is an investment for the next 4 to 5 years.

I also use c70 and I personally prefer to shoot interview on manual focus, I don’t mind subject getting out of focus for a few seconds if they move, that tottering fine

I did the same thing about 7 months ago. Loved my 6K Pros, but decided to sell those and pick up two C70s for the autofocus and the ability to shoot in 8-bit for quick turnaround projects. Both Blackmagic and Canon make lovely cameras and I do miss the look of the 6k Pro at times, but the C70s can just do more with less effort.

The reason the UI on BM is so simple is there is not really a lot of things you can change compared to Sony and Canon. Still it is nice. I think you're starting to see Canon and Sony introduce menu systems that can be a bit of either.

I shot a concert with my c300 MK III a while ago. Image stabilization was enabled and when shooting that punk band pretty close i saw the stage and lights headbanging while the singer was standing still. That was super weird😂

Great video! One question, does digital IS work with an EF adapter / EF lens?

Former Red Dragon 6k (DSMC1) and Komodo Owner. I switch to Canon C70 and Im not looking back. For jobs that require a Red, I just charge the client rental fee's for Arri Alexa

Direction to talent with an AF system - ''please rock back and forth more''.

I‘m thinking about getting the R5C or BMPCC6K Pro. Autofocus and stills/video cam in one or better codecs, cheaper, built in nds? Smaller canon or bigger BM? It‘s such a hard choice and often it is the price that lets me tend towards the BM, but somehow I don‘t want to miss autofocus for gimbal work or interviews where you have to take care of 2 cameras at once. I had the Pocket6K in the past and of course often did not bring it with me on „smaller“ shoots or travels - but the 5c I could just take instead of my R6 and go everywhere and still get the best results…

I've had a C70 for about a year now and have loved it, though I'm thinking of switching to sony for ease of use, specifically autofocus, in body stabilisation, low light capability and form factor. Though I feel like I'll regret selling my C70. I own an R7 which I use as a B cam, it's ok but the image isn't quite there for me. Exposure has to be perfect or it looks a bit muddy, and even then it's only ok imo. However, using the R7 for handheld doco kind of stuff is a dream, the IBIS and form factor makes grabbing B roll really enjoyable. I'm hoping to have a similar experience with the fx3 but with better image quality than the r7.

Shooting on the Komodo + Canon R5. Great pairing. Would have gone with a C70 over the R5 but I need the ability to switch to stills. At one point I would've agreed with you on Blackmagic having the best UI in the industry but I think RED has overtaken them with the DSMC3 cameras.

I’m working for a private school in Gold Coast, and we’ve got a C70 on the way to pair up with our R6. Only just starting in shooting more talking heads, event coverage and micro stories for the school. Glad to hear you enjoy the 15-35 and 24-70 as those are on order! Will be subscribing and paying attention to anything I may find helpful! Thanks for the informative video!

Great upgrade 🤘 I have the pocket 4k and Fujifilm xh1 might sound ueehhhgg but is what I can afford and mostly invest in skills and light/gaffer. Once i get more jobs it will make sense to upgrade to better system specially with new cam coming with great autofocus.

We also just changed from Sony Equip (FX3's) to 2 x Canon C70's and love them! The range of projects we are able to shoot with the C70 is super useful and the image is amazing.

One thing to keep in mind with the 15-35 CanonF2.8 vs the Sigma 18-35 F1.8, since it's a full frame lens you can use it fully on the R5C its important to consider the crop factor effecting the effective aperture. The Sigma on the C70 would be equivalent to a fullframe f2.5 (because the crop factor of the C70 is 1.43) so the Canon lens on a full frame body will provide a very close look to the R5C in regards to background blur and similar fields of view. Also out of curiosity, did you discover the luminance (LCD backlight) setting in the C70 monitor settings? I found I needed it set to +2 for anything outdoors, but I've seen a lot of reviewers of the camera complain about the brightness of the screen not knowing you could increase it, since it's a poorly named setting. So just curious if you found that setting and what you send to run it in +1 or +2, thanks!

Great video! I' m leaning to c70 but scared of c90 or c70mk2, after all, it's almost 3 years "old" camera, do you recomend buying it in late 2022? :)

The autofocus and stabiliser functions as demonstrated by your Canons have really come a long-long way. My recall is that from go with its original XL1, the Canon color rendition was the best. My camera assets are distinctly low-budget. More recently I have been getting by with multiple copies of dead cameras and arriving at enough bits and pieces to build a goer. That tends to leave a person several generations behind the latest and greatest. Recently I have managed to upgrade to the Ursa Mini Pro G1. My previous camera is an Ursa Mini 4.6K which is also a bitzer put together with some Mini Pro pieces. BM must have sold lot of Mini Pro G1s or they might have had a high mortality rate as I have had a bountiful harvest. Sadly for me but good for BM and owners, the Ursa G2s and 12Ks seem to be staying together much better as distressed examples are not turning up on eBay. Your G2 experience seems to be an exception. I would like to have used the Mini Pro ND filter wheel assembly on the Ursa Mini 4.6K but there was too much difference between the two types for this to happen. Whilst essentially keeping the same form, BM does not seem to have sat on its hands. There have been many subtle changes, redesign work and generally the product seems to have matured. My compromise with the Ursa 4.6K was to add an internal IRND filter on the back of the anti-reflection cone in the camera throat and shim the mount forward to compensate for the change in flange to focal plane distance the filter introduces. I did this to bring the intensity of outdoors daylight down to sensible levels without having to cart matteboxes and filters around or use fast shutter and pinpoint apertures. It is as expected not so good in low light conditions but for my purposes I can live with that. The "new" Mini Pro has BRAW, so I shall have to come to grips with that in Resolve which I in my geriatricy have finally just managed to learn my way around.

Coming back to weddings and uits funny the C70 and the 6K pro are two cameras I am considering, depending how well it all goes but I am currently on a fuji. Though I know the mirrorless won't cut it forever, even if I do love the image.

I have the r5c Fuji xh2s and c70. im looking at replacing the xh2s as c cam with the bmcc6k full frame and using r5c as my new c cam content camera. Do you think the 6k would make a better production camera as a B cam or should I just keep the r5c/c70 combo for clients and xh2s for personal stuff?

Hi there, I’m considering going from my BMPCC4K to the Canon R5C, but I’m hesitating bc the image from the BM cams are so filmic, whereas much of what I’ve seen from the Canon cams looks a bit too digitally sharp and plastic-y, less organic to my eye. I prefer a softer film look. Any thoughts on this? I understand much can be achieved in post, but curious what you think, having worked with both cams? Thanks!

I currently have the pocket 6k pro, and as you said, the image is just too good for me to not want to shoot everything with it😂I'm also perfectly happy with pulling focus for video work. the only reason I'm still searching for cameras is that I really don't enjoy carrying a whole 2nd camera just for taking photos when I'm traveling, so I'm trying to decide if the r5c could be my perfect camera that bridges my video and photo needs. I think I might miss the awesome display on the 6k pro, internal nd, and a bit of dynamic range(highlight recovery, too) tho. What would you recommend?

about digital is, it's best to use with lenses without optical image stablization, otherwise you get stutter movement. the only exception is canon R7, which is quite good for stablization with lens is, almost no stutter, however the whole image is wobbling for wide lenses

I agree with you I switched from Sony a7siii to the Canon R5C, The Sony colors are manageable in good lighting conditions but in certain situations they are just downright disgusting. I film a lot of live performances and specifically stage lights or less than ideal lighting conditions the Sony colors just go haywire and you have to play absolute hell to wrangle them in.

Another 6k pro user here… I’m also invested in the Fuji system too as I like to shoot stills also. (Although the video on Fuji is no slouch…) 10 bit internal with beautiful colours 😮 Am I tempted to switch? Yeah, every time a manufacturer brings out a new feature which the 6kpro doesn’t have 😂 but seriously, value for money, it’s a cracking bit if kit. I’ve been using a c300 mk3 for a month and interestingly, I sent it back…, I mainly shoot on cine glass with the odd powered zoom on a photography / hybrid Len’s for run n hun. It’s all in the lens. I’m thinking of going the LiDAR route for the occasional bit of gimbal work (I hate gimbals most of the time as they’re overused. But, i do use sparingly when required while rack focusing on a dji rs3pro. It’s ok. I actually like this technique but perhaps im just a control freak? 😊

Do you have the speed booster? I’ve heard it has a purple spot in the centre? Has anyone found this?

I am doing the same thing actually, selling my g2 to stay with r5c , because i find my self filming 1 man band more often, and with r5c it is easier

I shoot with two C70 and one R5C because all what you said in the video

Ok, I'll bite on that question. Used to have the small form factor Sony's. Now I am rocking the BMPCC6K Pro, just sold my R5c and waiting to get a C70. In addition I have the R6ii for hybrid purposes. I truly like the BM but its unnecessarily cumbersome on some projects so the C70 is more than perfect for those.

I have c70, BM 6k Pro and R6 for stills and I'm super happy... BUT as much as I love c70 and believe also that there is no camera under 10k that can provide such an amazing image quality and all of these specs... my heart tends to be a little more on the 6k Pro! Can I explain it? No! P.S. That Arri Alexa Classic image is still above competition... so so beautiful!!!

Is there a big difference in video quality between the r5c and r5 considering they have the same sensor? Specially 4k hq and raw modes.

You should try the Phantom Luts for the sony cameras, its really the only lut you should use for slog3

now canon needs to make a r5c with internal NDs. Would be a dream device for me.

Nice video… I’m a Ursa 12k shooter. I feel that BMD isn’t releasing the camera that most of us want. I’ve been waiting on a B-cam to my Ursa 12k for a while now. I am not interested in their older sensors (pocket 6k, Broadcast G2, Ursa Mini Pro G2); I do not like investing in old tech. They have released cam’s BUT I do not care about the Pocket 6k G2/Broadcast G2. This isn’t what I want at all! I’m looking for a smaller form factor that has my 12k sensor or a newer sensor (that can possible record in other codecs). & a coupe of other upgrades. Another camera that I think about purchasing is an Arri Mini LF or 35; but yeah that’s very pricy lmao For certain gigs, I find myself renting out 3-4 Sony’s (Sony Fx6, Sony Fx3…etc). I just can’t see myself totally investing in them though.

got the same setup.. But i found that the c70 works even better with the speedbooster also from canon and EF glas. The R5C simply doesent work without the battery grib, its just how it is.. (i have an fx lion for backup battery also since it thews trough battery lige crazy) and then with the canon ND adaptor you have "build in" ish and can use the same EF mount glas for both cameras. together with two tentacles track E that has 32-bit float together with three timecode generators (the new one) is brilliant. Just saying :) and get an buttom plate for the c70 that is centeret it will make you go crazy working with tripods.

Hey, could you please tell me if the footage of the c70 and R5c is similar or quite different ? I always hear the c70 looks more filmic, while the R5c looks kinda digital like the R5. Also, is the CLOG 3 on the R5c as noisy as the R5 or has it been improved on R5c ? Thanks again!!

I switched to the c70 this year too! Still have my 6kpro but soooo many problems with it.

Hello there, for shooting a feature film on a budget, i am doubting. The c70 can do RAW, IS and auto focus, wich I would love to use since I'm on a budget. But of course, the image is very important. So can i Color grade c70 raw looking like BMPCC? Very curious to your answer, because you make the image cinematic! Thanks, nicolaas

Did you ever use the r5c with the bmpcc 6k?

How does the Highlight rolloff compare between the Canon C70 and Black Magic Pocket Pro or Ursa?

I shoot with a canon C70 and R3. Honestly really happy with the combo though my wallet was not 🤢🤣 I do both photo and video work for brands and businesses locally and shoot weddings. personally I love the c70 for many of the reasons you mentioned. It's been a dream camera for me! the few things I wanted in a b cam to compliment the c70 were Ibis, a Raw option, and ability to take photos! Also I really wanted something more rugged and weather sealed for shooting in the PNW weather as I've always felt the c70 really lacked in that area. The R3, while expensive, check all those boxes and has great battery life. Miss some of the video features(false color, etc) but I've been working around it. Might eventually add an R5c as my C cam. Would make a great photo compliment to my r3 when I need more resolution, and a great 3rd camera when needed.

Agree about Canon color. There's something wrong with the Sony image.

I have the URSA 12K and I sometimes think maybe I need a bit of a lighter camera with also great quality for run&gun

I shoot with 2 R5's and they are amazing. Planning on getting a C70 in the future and hoping canon releases an update to remove the 30 minute limit on the R5. RF lenses are just beasts!

What are your thoughts on the Canon c100 mark ii camera.... your thoughts ?

I'm considering getting FX30 for B cam to my Pocket 6k, mainly to get AF for some dance videos etc. I'm not a fan of Canon cameras, and their color science is overrated for me personally.

Thanks for the video! Some random thoughts as I was watching it.... -- I've got two C70s + one r5c, and currently considering a third C70. Wouldn't get a C500 ii or C300 iii (or another r5c -- just not as reliable as C70, especially for long recordings -- it still has limited record time, and still overheats). And I'm also still using 1DC and 5D3 cameras for particular jobs. So, that tells you what I think of Canon. But, that said.... -- Autofocus. So, you emphasised that you like autofocus during interviews, especially for shallow depth of field. It gives you peace of mind, etc. Personally, and maybe it's just me, I switch off autofocus during interviews, and I wouldn't recommend it for this use case. The thing is, if the talent leans forwards or backwards, and you're using a photography lens, well... Maybe the talent stays in focus, but you also get this obvious, artificial-looking, shot-destroying lens breathing, especially for shallow depth of field. Not only does this breathing make the shot ugly, but it makes it difficult to do any sort of "replacement" work (if you need to cover up something in the background of the interview -- like signage outside a window or a power outlet on a wall). And if your interview subject is a leaner and does this all the freaking time, then it's not the sort of thing you can cover up with a bit of overlay. Perhaps that's down to my settings, though.... Maybe you could set the camera to not adjust focus so quickly.... But, then, does that defeat the purpose of leaving autofocus on at all? But, yep, autofocus is indispensable for gimbal work. Don't leave home without it! And it's also great for initially acquiring focus; none of us is getting any younger, and everyone's eyes succumb to age-related myopia in the end. The green box that assists manual focus is great on the C70, by the way. -- Digital IS. I wouldn't recommend this either!! Maybe if you're doing a macro shot and want a bit of extra smoothness. The problem, as long-haired you mentioned, is the jumping. Particularly if you're using a close-up lens, you're going to get this all the time... And definitely if you're on some other form of stabiliser, like a tripod or a gimbal, turn that damn thing off. Even with cameras from 20 years ago, it wasn't recommended to have IS on with tripods. -- Cheers for mentioning that 50p to 25p in post doesn't have the same motion blur. A lot of people I know simply shoot in 50p as a matter of course for the option of slow-down in post, but, yup, it doesn't look quite the same. -- Three negatives with RF lenses.... Firstly, cost, when compared with EF. Secondly, with the C70, you get the extra stop when using EF + speedbooster. That's a big deal to many people; I guess it depends what you're shooting. Thirdly, the RF 70-200 can't be used with a doubler (again, your mileage will of course vary as to whether this is a turn-off). Otherwise, the reduction in weight with the 70-200 is welcome.... -- Your Arri Alexa Classic -- gorgeous images. Better than everything else in this video! Thanks for sharing.

10:01 You're prob going to get a lot of flack for this comment but I completely agree. And I shot exclusively on Sony for 10yrs.

I have the C70 and leave the image stabilisation off. It ruins your shot with lots of jitter.

I actually left Canon for Blackmagic. Canon has a very high end video camera look where Blackmagic has a very filmic look imho. I’ll probably Aquire some Sony FX cameras later on to compliment my BM cameras for documentary or Events. All cameras are just tools. There is no perfect camera.

Red cameras also use rf so you wouldn't be locked in

it's a bit of a bugger canon have banned any 3rd party rf lenses.

I don't think I have the money for r5c, I am going to buy bmpcc 6kg2 in 2 3 months

i´m an happy gopro youser becos of cep

Funny how the color changes when you mention the Sony color!

R5C the best

Definitely a downgrade in image as far as narrative work goes but needed if you're doing wedding/docu work that requires quick setups.

C70 is more practical but in terms of image, P6K is in much higher league

cant agree - i own fx3 and fx6 love canon colors but now i can use internal lut with both and with the right lut it looks better then canon in every situation and fx6 is ff with better af and better connections also auto nd is amazing if colors is what you want i hope you didnt used the sh***t s-cinatone bad colors and you loose tone of DR for sure it dosent look like venice

Why i switched from Pizza to Burger... Mostly

I see what you did there at 10:00 lol, leave sony colour ALONE!